SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 16
Job Evaluation
How the company fix salary to their
employees?
• It is through job evaluation !
• Job evaluation is the outcome of job analysis.
• Each job is analyzed in terms of specific
dimensions like educational level, responsibility
level, discretion level, relationship with other
impact level. These are then evaluated and few
levels are fixed so that these can be used to
determine compensations to the job holder like
salary and other financial and non-financial
rewards
• Job evaluation is the process of analysis and
assessment of jobs to ascertain relatively their
relative worth, using the assessment as the
basis for a balanced wage structure.
• The techniques of job evaluation: Job analysis
has two techniques:
• Non quantitative technique
• Quantitative technique
Non quantitative technique
• Non-Quantitative techniques:
• This has
• Simple ranking method
• Paired comparison method
• Grading method
• Simple ranking method:
• This method compares one job with other job
based on duties, responsibility, and the degree
of importance to the organization. This mostly
used in small organization.
• Paired comparison method:
• The evaluator ranks each job in turn against all other
jobs to be appraised so that a series of paired ranking is
produced. In other words each job is paired with every
other job in turn, and the more difficult job of the pair
is indicated by the assessor.
• They are ranked according to the number of times they
are more judged as more difficult.
• It is usual to distribute the pairs of jobs among several
judges and collect the results on a computer.
• Grading method:
• Major job classes are established. Various jobs
are assigned by ranking to these grades based
on their personal interpretations of relative
difficulty of tasks, responsility
involved, knowledge and experience
required, authority level etc. This grading
method mostly followed in public sector
undertakings.
• Quantitative techniques:
• This has three techniques. They are
• Pont method
• Factor comparison method
• Hay method(For executives)
• Point method:
• The point method break the job in to
components and evaluate each of the job
elements against specially construed scales.
There are four steps in the point method. They
are
• Selection of compensable factors
• Establishment of factor scales
• Assignment of points to degrees and
• Application to organizational jobs
• Factor comparison method:
• The factor comparison method is a method of
quantifying the job versus the job comparison. It
is the least commonly used method of job
evaluation. There are three steps in this method.
• The first step is to select key jobs to help anchor
the system. Key jobs are those jobs that are found
many organizations that have relatively stable job
content ; they also have to be jobs for which the
prevailing wage rates are known.
• The second step is to rank the key jobson a few
compensable factors, such as
skill, effort, responsibility and job conditions.
• The third step is to determine for each key job
the amount of the present pay rate that is
attributable to each of the factors. Suppose the
trotal rate of a job is say $7.75, $1.75 is allocated
for its level of skill, $1.75 for effort, $1.25 for
responsibility and n$3.00 for working condition
• Problem solving is the amount of original thinking
required by the job for arriving decisions; it
includes the sub factors of degree of freedom and
type of mental activity. Accountability is defined
as being answerable for actions taken on the job;
its three sub factors are freedom to act, dollar
magnitude and impact.
• The hay guide chart allows the evaluator to
assign a point for each factor. The total of the
points across all factors is the value of the job
Computerized job evaluation
• This the recent trend in job evaluation. Here after
some training, incumbents complete the
structured questionnaires such as job position
analysis questionnaire or task oriented
questionnaire for the jobs they supervise.
• Responses about time spent on and importance
of various tasks are then incorporated into a
statistical regression technique to calculate job
points and the appropriate location of a job in the
salary structure.
• Services that score the position analysis
questionnaire also provide job evaluation
information.
• Other computer based procedure operate in
similar fashions. That is they facilitate, a survey of
jobs, evaluation of jobs, and the aggregation of
market data for comparisons.
• More and more computers are playing an
important role in removing the drudgery from
salary determination
• The end

More Related Content

What's hot

Job analysis and design
Job analysis and designJob analysis and design
Job analysis and designMrinmoy Sarma
 
Job evaluation - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
Job evaluation -  compensation management - Manu Melwin JoyJob evaluation -  compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
Job evaluation - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joymanumelwin
 
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and ToolsJob Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and ToolsCharles Cotter, PhD
 
Job Evaluation and Salary Design
Job Evaluation and Salary DesignJob Evaluation and Salary Design
Job Evaluation and Salary DesignSonnie Santos
 
Compensation Management 1
Compensation Management 1Compensation Management 1
Compensation Management 1rajeevgupta
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluationAnkit Sand
 
All you need to know about implementing the Paterson Job Grading system
All you need to know about implementing the Paterson Job Grading systemAll you need to know about implementing the Paterson Job Grading system
All you need to know about implementing the Paterson Job Grading systemGeorge Vorster
 
Job Analysis & Job Design
Job Analysis & Job DesignJob Analysis & Job Design
Job Analysis & Job DesignRebekahSamuel2
 
Presentation on job design
Presentation on job designPresentation on job design
Presentation on job designSANDEEP KUMAR
 
Job evaluation its methods and advantages & dis-advatages
Job evaluation its methods and advantages & dis-advatagesJob evaluation its methods and advantages & dis-advatages
Job evaluation its methods and advantages & dis-advatagesuniversity of education
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluationMahesh Sah
 
Compensation and benefits
Compensation and benefitsCompensation and benefits
Compensation and benefitsSublaxmi Gupta
 
Pay structure decisions presentation
Pay structure decisions presentationPay structure decisions presentation
Pay structure decisions presentationEdchel Sorianosos
 
Performance management
Performance management Performance management
Performance management Preeti Bhaskar
 
Job analysis - Principles of Human Resource Management
Job analysis - Principles of Human Resource ManagementJob analysis - Principles of Human Resource Management
Job analysis - Principles of Human Resource ManagementRai University Ahmedabad
 
Job description vs job specification
Job description vs job specificationJob description vs job specification
Job description vs job specificationMalik Awan
 

What's hot (20)

Job analysis and design
Job analysis and designJob analysis and design
Job analysis and design
 
Job evaluation - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
Job evaluation -  compensation management - Manu Melwin JoyJob evaluation -  compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
Job evaluation - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joy
 
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and ToolsJob Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
 
Job Evaluation and Salary Design
Job Evaluation and Salary DesignJob Evaluation and Salary Design
Job Evaluation and Salary Design
 
Compensation Management 1
Compensation Management 1Compensation Management 1
Compensation Management 1
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluation
 
All you need to know about implementing the Paterson Job Grading system
All you need to know about implementing the Paterson Job Grading systemAll you need to know about implementing the Paterson Job Grading system
All you need to know about implementing the Paterson Job Grading system
 
Job Analysis & Job Design
Job Analysis & Job DesignJob Analysis & Job Design
Job Analysis & Job Design
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluation
 
HR - Job Analysis
HR - Job AnalysisHR - Job Analysis
HR - Job Analysis
 
Presentation on job design
Presentation on job designPresentation on job design
Presentation on job design
 
Job evaluation its methods and advantages & dis-advatages
Job evaluation its methods and advantages & dis-advatagesJob evaluation its methods and advantages & dis-advatages
Job evaluation its methods and advantages & dis-advatages
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluation
 
Compensation and benefits
Compensation and benefitsCompensation and benefits
Compensation and benefits
 
Job analysis HRM
Job analysis HRMJob analysis HRM
Job analysis HRM
 
Pay structure decisions presentation
Pay structure decisions presentationPay structure decisions presentation
Pay structure decisions presentation
 
Performance management
Performance management Performance management
Performance management
 
Job analysis
Job analysisJob analysis
Job analysis
 
Job analysis - Principles of Human Resource Management
Job analysis - Principles of Human Resource ManagementJob analysis - Principles of Human Resource Management
Job analysis - Principles of Human Resource Management
 
Job description vs job specification
Job description vs job specificationJob description vs job specification
Job description vs job specification
 

Viewers also liked

Hay guide chart.pptx [autosaved]
Hay guide chart.pptx [autosaved]Hay guide chart.pptx [autosaved]
Hay guide chart.pptx [autosaved]Shivam Srivastava
 
Hrm job evaluation
Hrm job evaluationHrm job evaluation
Hrm job evaluationvickey21
 
JOB EVALUATION
JOB EVALUATIONJOB EVALUATION
JOB EVALUATIONHRM751
 

Viewers also liked (6)

Job evaluation ppt
Job evaluation pptJob evaluation ppt
Job evaluation ppt
 
Job Evaluation
Job EvaluationJob Evaluation
Job Evaluation
 
Hay guide chart.pptx [autosaved]
Hay guide chart.pptx [autosaved]Hay guide chart.pptx [autosaved]
Hay guide chart.pptx [autosaved]
 
Hay jobs evaluation
Hay jobs evaluationHay jobs evaluation
Hay jobs evaluation
 
Hrm job evaluation
Hrm job evaluationHrm job evaluation
Hrm job evaluation
 
JOB EVALUATION
JOB EVALUATIONJOB EVALUATION
JOB EVALUATION
 

Similar to How Companies Determine Employee Salaries

Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluationHR Spot
 
hrm-jobevaluation-130310080142-phpapp01.pdf
hrm-jobevaluation-130310080142-phpapp01.pdfhrm-jobevaluation-130310080142-phpapp01.pdf
hrm-jobevaluation-130310080142-phpapp01.pdfssuser112f91
 
Job evaluation - Module 2 - MG University - Manu Melwin Joy
Job evaluation -  Module 2 - MG University - Manu Melwin JoyJob evaluation -  Module 2 - MG University - Manu Melwin Joy
Job evaluation - Module 2 - MG University - Manu Melwin Joymanumelwin
 
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENTHUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENTDoshi Ravi
 
KMB202 (HRM) unit 4 job evaluation
KMB202 (HRM) unit 4 job evaluationKMB202 (HRM) unit 4 job evaluation
KMB202 (HRM) unit 4 job evaluationPooja Tiwari
 
Job evaluation l 11
Job evaluation  l 11Job evaluation  l 11
Job evaluation l 11prannoy2392
 
Job Evaluation.pptx
Job Evaluation.pptxJob Evaluation.pptx
Job Evaluation.pptxLeel Asok
 
Job evaluation & merit rating
Job evaluation & merit ratingJob evaluation & merit rating
Job evaluation & merit ratingBibin Ssb
 
Job evaluation bb
Job evaluation  bbJob evaluation  bb
Job evaluation bbMona Singh
 
Reward Management
Reward ManagementReward Management
Reward ManagementAnia Ania
 
Job Evaluation
Job Evaluation Job Evaluation
Job Evaluation KiritKene
 
Compensation
CompensationCompensation
CompensationjoduModhu
 

Similar to How Companies Determine Employee Salaries (20)

Job evaluation.pptx
Job evaluation.pptxJob evaluation.pptx
Job evaluation.pptx
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluation
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluation
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluation
 
hrm-jobevaluation-130310080142-phpapp01.pdf
hrm-jobevaluation-130310080142-phpapp01.pdfhrm-jobevaluation-130310080142-phpapp01.pdf
hrm-jobevaluation-130310080142-phpapp01.pdf
 
Job evaluation - Module 2 - MG University - Manu Melwin Joy
Job evaluation -  Module 2 - MG University - Manu Melwin JoyJob evaluation -  Module 2 - MG University - Manu Melwin Joy
Job evaluation - Module 2 - MG University - Manu Melwin Joy
 
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENTHUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 
Chapter 3- Performance Management
Chapter 3- Performance ManagementChapter 3- Performance Management
Chapter 3- Performance Management
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluation
 
KMB202 (HRM) unit 4 job evaluation
KMB202 (HRM) unit 4 job evaluationKMB202 (HRM) unit 4 job evaluation
KMB202 (HRM) unit 4 job evaluation
 
Job evaluation l 11
Job evaluation  l 11Job evaluation  l 11
Job evaluation l 11
 
Job Evaluation.pptx
Job Evaluation.pptxJob Evaluation.pptx
Job Evaluation.pptx
 
Job evolution ppt
Job evolution pptJob evolution ppt
Job evolution ppt
 
Job evaluation & merit rating
Job evaluation & merit ratingJob evaluation & merit rating
Job evaluation & merit rating
 
Job evaluation bb
Job evaluation  bbJob evaluation  bb
Job evaluation bb
 
Reward Management
Reward ManagementReward Management
Reward Management
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluation
 
nothing else
nothing elsenothing else
nothing else
 
Job Evaluation
Job Evaluation Job Evaluation
Job Evaluation
 
Compensation
CompensationCompensation
Compensation
 

More from Ambalam Subarao Mohanram (12)

New Microsoft Word Document.docx
New Microsoft Word Document.docxNew Microsoft Word Document.docx
New Microsoft Word Document.docx
 
Ob 1(importance, nature and framework)
Ob 1(importance, nature and framework)Ob 1(importance, nature and framework)
Ob 1(importance, nature and framework)
 
3. mission and purpose
3. mission and purpose3. mission and purpose
3. mission and purpose
 
2 a the stake holders in business
2 a the stake holders in business2 a the stake holders in business
2 a the stake holders in business
 
1 introduction to strategy 2-a
1 introduction to strategy 2-a1 introduction to strategy 2-a
1 introduction to strategy 2-a
 
Induction
InductionInduction
Induction
 
Validity of tests
Validity of testsValidity of tests
Validity of tests
 
Job analysis
Job analysisJob analysis
Job analysis
 
Motivation
MotivationMotivation
Motivation
 
Managing technology and innovation
Managing technology and innovationManaging technology and innovation
Managing technology and innovation
 
1 introduction to strategy
1 introduction to strategy1 introduction to strategy
1 introduction to strategy
 
Mohanram publication
Mohanram publicationMohanram publication
Mohanram publication
 

How Companies Determine Employee Salaries

  • 1. Job Evaluation How the company fix salary to their employees?
  • 2. • It is through job evaluation ! • Job evaluation is the outcome of job analysis. • Each job is analyzed in terms of specific dimensions like educational level, responsibility level, discretion level, relationship with other impact level. These are then evaluated and few levels are fixed so that these can be used to determine compensations to the job holder like salary and other financial and non-financial rewards
  • 3. • Job evaluation is the process of analysis and assessment of jobs to ascertain relatively their relative worth, using the assessment as the basis for a balanced wage structure. • The techniques of job evaluation: Job analysis has two techniques: • Non quantitative technique • Quantitative technique
  • 4. Non quantitative technique • Non-Quantitative techniques: • This has • Simple ranking method • Paired comparison method • Grading method
  • 5. • Simple ranking method: • This method compares one job with other job based on duties, responsibility, and the degree of importance to the organization. This mostly used in small organization.
  • 6. • Paired comparison method: • The evaluator ranks each job in turn against all other jobs to be appraised so that a series of paired ranking is produced. In other words each job is paired with every other job in turn, and the more difficult job of the pair is indicated by the assessor. • They are ranked according to the number of times they are more judged as more difficult. • It is usual to distribute the pairs of jobs among several judges and collect the results on a computer.
  • 7. • Grading method: • Major job classes are established. Various jobs are assigned by ranking to these grades based on their personal interpretations of relative difficulty of tasks, responsility involved, knowledge and experience required, authority level etc. This grading method mostly followed in public sector undertakings.
  • 8. • Quantitative techniques: • This has three techniques. They are • Pont method • Factor comparison method • Hay method(For executives)
  • 9. • Point method: • The point method break the job in to components and evaluate each of the job elements against specially construed scales. There are four steps in the point method. They are • Selection of compensable factors • Establishment of factor scales • Assignment of points to degrees and • Application to organizational jobs
  • 10. • Factor comparison method: • The factor comparison method is a method of quantifying the job versus the job comparison. It is the least commonly used method of job evaluation. There are three steps in this method. • The first step is to select key jobs to help anchor the system. Key jobs are those jobs that are found many organizations that have relatively stable job content ; they also have to be jobs for which the prevailing wage rates are known.
  • 11. • The second step is to rank the key jobson a few compensable factors, such as skill, effort, responsibility and job conditions. • The third step is to determine for each key job the amount of the present pay rate that is attributable to each of the factors. Suppose the trotal rate of a job is say $7.75, $1.75 is allocated for its level of skill, $1.75 for effort, $1.25 for responsibility and n$3.00 for working condition
  • 12.
  • 13. • Problem solving is the amount of original thinking required by the job for arriving decisions; it includes the sub factors of degree of freedom and type of mental activity. Accountability is defined as being answerable for actions taken on the job; its three sub factors are freedom to act, dollar magnitude and impact. • The hay guide chart allows the evaluator to assign a point for each factor. The total of the points across all factors is the value of the job
  • 14. Computerized job evaluation • This the recent trend in job evaluation. Here after some training, incumbents complete the structured questionnaires such as job position analysis questionnaire or task oriented questionnaire for the jobs they supervise. • Responses about time spent on and importance of various tasks are then incorporated into a statistical regression technique to calculate job points and the appropriate location of a job in the salary structure.
  • 15. • Services that score the position analysis questionnaire also provide job evaluation information. • Other computer based procedure operate in similar fashions. That is they facilitate, a survey of jobs, evaluation of jobs, and the aggregation of market data for comparisons. • More and more computers are playing an important role in removing the drudgery from salary determination