BMAL 500 Projects Grading Rubric Criteria Levels of Achievement Content 70% Advanced (92–100%) Proficient (84–91%) Developing (1–83%) Not Present Points Earned Abstract 14 to 15 points There is an abstract statement with topic selection to provide a clear overview of the paper’s contents. The statement adheres to APA and is in depth to properly introduce the paper. 13 points An abstract statement is provided, there is a somewhat clear overview of the paper’s contents and topic selection. The statement somewhat adheres to APA with some depth. 1 to 12 points A brief overview of the paper is provided but it is not clear of the paper’s contents and topic selection. The statement does not adhere to APA and is not in depth enough to properly introduce the paper. 0 points No abstract statement is provided. Content 69 to 75 points Each step is completed with clear, distinct sections (separate headings for each), and all the content is properly addressed in a thorough manner from the outlined steps. Each of the main points for the subsections of the steps are thoroughly addressed with a specific discussion and examples applied. A thorough, specific discussion of the personality tests exists with a clear application to the results, using statistical/percentage scores for support, along with professional and/or personal life examples. Each of the steps are clearly supported with examples and research. 63 to 68 points Each step is completed with somewhat clear, somewhat distinct sections (separate headings for each), and some of the content is properly addressed in a thorough manner from the outlined steps. Each of the main points for the subsections of the steps are somewhat addressed with some discussion and examples applied. A somewhat thorough, discussion of the personality tests exists with an application to the results, using statistical/percentage scores for support, along with professional and/or personal life examples. Each of the steps are somewhat supported. 1 to 62 points Each step is completed but not as clear, no distinct sections, and some of the content is not as properly addressed in a thorough manner from the outlined steps. Some of the main points for the subsections of the steps are addressed with little discussion and examples applied. A brief discussion of the personality tests exists with little to no application to the results in each step with little to no statistical/percentage, or professional/ personal life examples. Some areas are vaguely supported with examples and research. 0 points Each step is not completed properly or addressed in the manner from the outlined steps. The main points for the subsections of the steps are not addressed with discussion and examples applied. There is no discussion of the personality tests with appropriate results correlation to include professional/personal life examples. No research or examples were used. Conclusion 14 to 15 points The conclusion offers a well-rounded summa.

1. BMAL 500
Projects Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced (92–100%)
Proficient (84–91%)
Developing (1–83%)
Not Present
Points Earned
Abstract
14 to 15 points
There is an abstract statement with topic selection to provide a
clear overview of the paper’s contents. The statement adheres to
APA and is in depth to properly introduce the paper.
13 points
An abstract statement is provided, there is a somewhat clear
overview of the paper’s contents and topic selection. The
statement somewhat adheres to APA with some depth.
1 to 12 points
A brief overview of the paper is provided but it is not clear of
the paper’s contents and topic selection. The statement does not
adhere to APA and is not in depth enough to properly introduce
the paper.
0 points
No abstract statement is provided.
Content
69 to 75 points
Each step is completed with clear, distinct sections (separate
headings for each), and all the content is properly addressed in
a thorough manner from the outlined steps.

2. Each of the main points for the subsections of the steps are
thoroughly addressed with a specific discussion and examples
applied.
A thorough, specific discussion of the personality tests exists
with a clear application to the results, using
statistical/percentage scores for support, along with
professional and/or personal life examples.
Each of the steps are clearly supported with examples and
research.
63 to 68 points
Each step is completed with somewhat clear, somewhat distinct
sections (separate headings for each), and some of the content is
properly addressed in a thorough manner from the outlined
steps.
Each of the main points for the subsections of the steps are
somewhat addressed with some discussion and examples
applied.
A somewhat thorough, discussion of the personality tests exists
with an application to the results, using statistical/percentage
scores for support, along with professional and/or personal life
examples.
Each of the steps are somewhat supported.
1 to 62 points
Each step is completed but not as clear, no distinct sections, and
some of the content is not as properly addressed in a thorough
manner from the outlined steps.
Some of the main points for the subsections of the steps are
addressed with little discussion and examples applied.
A brief discussion of the personality tests exists with little to no

3. application to the results in each step with little to no
statistical/percentage, or professional/ personal life examples.
Some areas are vaguely supported with examples and research.
0 points
Each step is not completed properly or addressed in the manner
from the outlined steps.
The main points for the subsections of the steps are not
addressed with discussion and examples applied.
There is no discussion of the personality tests with appropriate
results correlation to include professional/personal life
examples.
No research or examples were used.
Conclusion
14 to 15 points
The conclusion offers a well-rounded summary of topics in the
paper and suggests a variety of opportunities for future use of
topics/relevance/purpose.
13 points
The conclusion offers a good summary of topics in the paper
and suggests some opportunities for future use of topics/
relevance/ purpose.
1 to 12 points
The conclusion offers a summary of the topics in the paper.
0 points
No conclusion was provided.
Criteria

4. Levels of Achievement
Structure 30%
Advanced (92–100%)
Proficient (84–91%)
Developing (1–83%)
Not Present
Points Earned
Materials/Source
14 to 15 points
The reference page contains at least 5 scholarly sources within
the last 5 years, and are evident within the paper.
The materials are properly cited and quoted in current APA
style.
The SafeAssign originality score is within a proper range.
13 points
There reference page contains scholarly sources but not within
the last 5 years, and are somewhat evident within the paper.
The materials are somewhat properly cited and quoted in current
APA style.
The SafeAssign originality score is somewhat within a proper
range.
1 to 12 points
The reference page lacks enough scholarly sources within the
last 5 years, and are not all evident within the paper.
The materials are not all properly cited and quoted in the
current APA style.
The SafeAssign originality score is somewhat within a proper
range.
0 points
The reference page does not include the appropriate scholarly
sources.
The materials were not properly cited and quoted in current
APA style.
The SafeAssign originality score is not within a proper range.

5. Structure
14 to 15 points
The transitions between paragraphs and sections are clear with
the use of proper headings and treated with logical order.
The required length (6 pages- does not include title, abstract, or
reference page) is met.
13 points
The transitions between paragraphs and sections are somewhat
clear with the use of headings and treated with a somewhat
logical order.
The required length (6 pages- does not include title, abstract, or
reference page) is somewhat met.
1 to 12 points
The transitions between paragraphs and sections are not clear
with the use of headings and treated with a logical order.
The required length (6 pages- does not include a title, abstract,
or reference page) is not fully met.
0 points
The transitions between paragraphs and sections are not
attempted and no logical order exists.
The required length (6 pages- does not include title, abstract, or
reference page) is not met.
Style
14 to 15 points
The paper has current APA formatted correctly, and the paper is
without spelling and grammatical errors.
13 points
The paper has current APA format with minor errors and the
paper has minor spelling and grammatical errors.
1 to 12 points
The paper has somewhat current APA format with multiple
errors and the paper has multiple spelling and grammatical

6. errors.
0 points
The paper does not comply with current APA format and has
numerous spelling and grammatical errors.
Total
/150
Instructor's Comments:
Page 1 of 1
BMAL 500
Project 1 Instructions
This project requires that you complete the Myers-Briggs
Personality Test online, and then apply your results. The links
and details are in Steps 1 and 2 (see below). Read all of the
instructions for this assignment before beginning any of your
work.
Step 1
1. Open the following website to complete the assessment: Jung
Typology Test.
2. Once complete, click on “Score it” to retrieve your four-letter
type.
3. Next, you will need to investigate your Temperament through
researching the topic, however the various sites below are
suggestions for descriptions of your Type and data on
relationships, careers, etc.
a. Personality Page-Four Temperaments: This site allows you to
explore the Temperaments by traits
b. Keirsey Overview: This site gives an overview of the
Temperaments and Keirsey but doesn't lend itself to a great deal
of information. You might find it has some other items of
interest for your traits though.
c. Personality Club: This site has a nice visual graphic on the
Temperaments for each trait.

7. 4. Using Temperaments links, explore Keirsey’s Temperaments
and go back to the Jung Typology test site to explore the
Sixteen Personality Types using the tabs at the top to locate the
description of your type. You may also research beyond these
suggested links as long as you cite them properly.
5. Once there, click on links for The Four Preferences,
Keirsey’s Temperaments, and Overview of the Sixteen
Personality Types to locate the description of your type. If you
cannot locate them within the Jung site, explore them through
the other links.
6. The personality test will reveal your 4-letter type and your 2-
letter temperament. In this step, you will discuss the validity of
each letter of your type and temperament. Provide your
statistical/percentage results for comparison of letters within
your discussion. Any adverse personal opinions on the
assessment tools must be respectful and scholarly with
supportive research.
7. Include a separate section for each letter of your personality
type, as well as a section for discussing how the different
aspects of your personality (represented by the letters) work
together. For example, if you scored with the letter “I,” then
that letter with your type will be a heading: I-Introverted.
· You must have separate sub-headings for each section.
· Give specific examples from your life—especially your work
life—and discuss the weaknesses of your personality type as
well. Refer to the Presentation: “Lesson 1–A Worldview
Perspective on Organizational Behavior,” found in the
Module/Week 1 Reading & Study folder.
Step 2
1. Apply the Type Talk at Work textbook, which focuses on
how various personality types relate at work. The book must be
evident within the discussion, not simply cited, with specific,
applied topics.
2. Using the Type Talk at Work textbook as your guide, discuss

8. the things you have learned about yourself that will help you
understand your organization and your role within it. In a new
section in your paper (labeled Step 2), answer the following
questions with specific correlation to the book:
· In general, what have you learned from these personality tests
about organizational behavior that will help you be a better
employee, coworker, and/or manager?
· In particular, what have you learned about yourself from this
personality test that will help you be a better employee,
coworker, and/or manager? Provide specific examples.
Formatting
1. Use current APA format for every element of the paper. Be
sure to include the current APA-formatted cover page, abstract,
and reference page. Refer to your APA manual for help or this
site for assistance:
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/18/
2. Write in first person—this is allowed due to the personal
nature of the assignment.
3. To facilitate the Instructor’s grading of these assignments,
you must have major headings for Steps 1 and 2. Additionally,
under the major heading of Step 1, you must have subheadings
for each separate letter of your Meyers-Briggs type. There must
also be a subheading describing your entire Meyers-Briggs
personality to round out the discussion with your Temperament.
You will need a total of 5 subheadings for Step 1.
4. The exact number of paragraphs that you include in each
section is your decision; your Instructor will not be grading you
on how many paragraphs you used per section, but rather the
extent to which you specifically addressed each of the areas
above.
5. The minimum of 6 required pages of content does not include
the title page, abstract page, or reference page. Those must be
counted as additional pages. You will likely find that it will be
difficult to address all of these things in only 6 pages, but that
constraint is part of the exercise itself. Learning to write
succinctly and efficiently will improve your communication

9. skills, regardless of the setting. Because you only have 6 pages
to discuss all these components, be concise.
6. Be sure to double-space, using Times New Roman 12-point
font only; use 1-inch margins, and avoid bold font (except for
headlines, per current APA format), underlining, and
contractions.
7. The reference page must include a minimum of the 5
following references in current APA format (all sources must be
evident within the paper and less than 5 years old):
· Presentation: Lesson 1 – A Worldview Perspective on
Organizational Behavior (in Module/Week 1),
· Type Talk at Work textbook,
· Organizational Behavior textbook,
· Jung Typology Test, and
· www.personalitypage.com.
Note: For further questions regarding current APA format, visit
Liberty University’s Online Writing Center.
Students may, although not required, submit Project 1 to the
appropriately labeled SafeAssign draft link first to review your
percentage of originality.
Submit Project 1 to the appropriate link for grading by 11:59
p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 2.
Page 2 of 2