SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 9
Descargar para leer sin conexión
TERMS OF THE CONTRACT


1a. THE PAROL EVIDENCE RULE

The parol evidence rule is that where the record of a transaction is embodied in a document,
extrinsic evidence is not generally admissible to vary or interpret the document or as a substitute
for it.

According to GH Treitel, The Law of Contract, 9th ed. p176, there are obvious grounds of
convenience for the application of the parol evidence rule to contracts: certainty is promoted by
holding that parties who have reduced a contract to writing should be bound by the writing and
by the writing alone. On the other hand, the parol evidence rule will commonly be invoked
where a dispute arises after the time of contracting as to what was actually said at that time; and
in such cases one of the parties could feel aggrieved if evidence on the point were excluded
merely because the disputed term was not set out in the contractual document. Evidence extrinsic
to the document is therefore admitted in a number of situations which fall outside the scope of
the rule.




1b. EXCEPTIONS TO THE PAROL EVIDENCE RULE:

(A) WRITTEN AGREEMENT NOT THE WHOLE AGREEMENT

If the written agreement was not intended to be the whole contract on which the parties had
actually agreed, parol evidence is admissible. See:

       Evans v Andrea Merzario [1976] 2 All ER 930.

(B) VALIDITY

Parol evidence may be given about the validity of the contract, eg to establish the presence or
absence of consideration or of contractual intention, or some invalidating cause such as
incapacity, misrepresentation, mistake or non est factum.

(C) IMPLIED TERMS

Where the contract is silent on a matter on which a term is normally implied by law, parol
evidence may be given to support, or to rebut, the usual implication. See:

       Burges v Wickham (1836) 3 B & S 669

                                                                                        Page 1 of 9
(D) OPERATION           OF THE CONTRACT
Parol evidence can be used to show that the contract does not yet operate, or that it has ceased to
operate. See:

       Pym v Campbell (1856) 6 E & B 370.

(E) EVIDENCE AS TO PARTIES
Parol evidence can be used to show in what capacities the parties contracted, eg where a person
contracts ostensibly as principal, evidence is admissible to prove that he really acted as another's
agent so as to entitle the latter to sue (Humfrey v Dale (1857) 7 E & B 266).

(F) AID TO CONSTRUCTION
Where the words of the contract are clear, parol evidence cannot be used to explain their
meaning, unless they have a special meaning by custom. Parol evidence can, on the other hand,
be used to explain words or phrases which are ambiguous, or which, if taken literally, make no
sense, as well as technical terms.

(G) TO PROVE CUSTOM
Evidence of custom is admissible "to annex incidents to written contracts in matters with respect
to which they are silent." (Hutton v Warren (1836). Custom can also be used as an aid to
construction, eg in Smith v Wilson (1832) evidence was admitted of a local custom to show that
"1,000 rabbits" meant "1,200 rabbits."

(H) RECTIFICATION
A document may fail in accurately recording the true agreement. Equity allows such a written
contract to be rectified by parol evidence. (See handout on Mistake)

(I) COLLATERAL CONTRACT
Even though parol evidence cannot be used to vary or add to the terms of a written contract, it
may be possible to show that the parties made two related contracts, one written and the other
oral, ie a collateral contract. See:

       City & Westminster Properties v Mudd [1959] Ch 129.

The Law Commission (1976) recommended that the rule should be abolished, but by 1986
concluded that it did not stop the courts accepting parol evidence if this was consistent with the
intention of the parties.

                                                                                         Page 2 of 9
2a. REPRESENTATIONS AND TERMS

The first step in determining the terms of a contract is to establish what the parties said or wrote.
Statements made during the course of negotiations may traditionally be classed as
representations or terms and if one turns out to be wrong, the plaintiff's remedy will depend on
how the statement is classified:

A representation is a statement of fact made by one party which induces the other to enter into
the contract. If it turns out to be incorrect the innocent party may sue for misrepresentation.
Breach of a term of the contract entitles the injured party to claim damages and, if he has been
deprived substantially what he bargained for, he will also be able to repudiate the contract.
If a statement is not a term of the principal contract, it is possible that it may be enforced as a
collateral contract (which has developed rapidly in the twentieth century as a significant means
by which the difficulties of fixing a statement with contractual force may be circumvented).

How can the courts decide whether a statement is a term or a mere representation? It was
established in Heilbut, Symons & Co v Buckleton [1913] AC 30, that intention is the overall
guide as to whether a statement is a term of the contract. In seeking to implement the parties'
intentions and decide whether a statement is a term or a mere representation, the courts will
consider the following four factors:

(A) TIMING
The court will consider the lapse of time between the making of the statement and the contract's
conclusion: if the interval is short the statement is more likely to be a term. See:

       Routledge v McKay [1954] 1 WLR 615
       Schawel v Reade [1913] 2 IR 64.


(B) IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT
The court will consider the importance of the truth of the statement as a pivotal factor in
finalising the contract. The statement may be of such importance that if it had not been made the
injured party would not have entered into the contract at all. See:

       Bannerman v White (1861) CB(NS) 844
       Couchman v Hill [1947] 1 All ER 103.




                                                                                          Page 3 of 9
(C) REDUCTION OF TERMS TO WRITING
The court will consider whether the statement was omitted in a later, formal contract in writing.
If the written contract does not incorporate the statement, this would suggest that the parties did
not intend the statement to be a contractual term. See:

       Routledge v McKay [1954] 1 WLR 615
       Birch v Paramount Estates (1956) 167.

(D) SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE/SKILLS
The court will consider whether the maker of the statement had specialist knowledge or was in a
better position than the other party to verify the statement's accuracy. See:

       Harling v Eddy [1951] 2 KB 739
       Oscar Chess v Williams [1957] 1 All ER 325
       Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith Motors [1965] 2 All ER 65.

2b. CONDITIONS AND WARRANTIES

Traditionally terms have been divided into two categories: conditions and warranties.

(A) CONDITIONS
A condition is a major term which is vital to the main purpose of the contract. A breach of
condition will entitle the injured party to repudiate the contract and claim damages. The injured
party may also choose to go on with the contract, despite the breach, and recover damages
instead. See:

       Poussard v Spiers (1876) 1 QBD 410

(Note: The word 'condition' also has another meaning. It may mean a stipulation that a contract
should not be enforceable except on the happening of a given event, or should be brought to an
end on the happening of a given event. The condition is then properly called a 'condition
precedent', or a 'condition subsequent' respectively. See Cheshire &Fifoot, p153-4).


(B) WARRANTIES

A warranty is a less important term: it does not go to the root of the contract. A breach of
warranty will only give the injured party the right to claim damages; he cannot repudiate the
contract. See:


                                                                                        Page 4 of 9
Bettini v Gye (1876) 1 QBD 183.

(C) INTERMEDIATE TERMS
It may be impossible to classify a term neatly in advance as either a condition or a warranty.
Some undertakings may occupy an intermediate position, in that the term can be assessed only in
the light of the consequences of a breach. If a breach of the term results in severe loss and
damage, the injured party will be entitled to repudiate the contract; where the breach involves
minor loss, the injured party's remedies will be restricted to damages. These intermediate terms
have also become known as innominate terms. See:

       Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha [1962] 1 All ER 474
       The MihalisAngelos [1971] 1 QB 164
       The Hansa Nord [1976] QB 44
       Reardon Smith Line v Hansen-Tangen [1976] 3 All ER 570
       Bunge Corporation v Tradax Export [1981] 2 All ER 513.

(D) NOTE
If the term is described in the contract as a 'condition' that will not be conclusive. See:

       Schuler v Wickman Machine Tools [1974] AC 235.

3. IMPLIED TERMS
In most contracts the primary obligations of the parties are contained in express terms. In
addition there are various circumstances in which extra terms may be implied into the agreement.

A) TERMS IMPLIED BY CUSTOM
The terms of a contract may have been negotiated against the background of the customs of a
particular locality or trade. The parties automatically assume that their contract will be subject to
such customs and so do not deal specifically with the matter in their contract. See:

       Hutton v Warren (1836) 1 M&W 466.

B) TERMS IMPLIED BY THE COURT
(i) Intention of the Parties/Terms Implied as Fact

The courts will be prepared to imply a term into a contract in order to give effect to the obvious
intentions of the parties. Sometimes the point at issue has been overlooked or the parties have


                                                                                              Page 5 of 9
failed to express their intention clearly. In these circumstances, the court will supply a term in the
interests of 'business efficacy' so that the contract makes commercial sense. See:

       The Moorcock (1889) 14 PD 64.

A more recent test is the 'officious bystander test' used to incorporate implied obvious terms
(Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1940] AC 701). If while the parties were making their contract,
an officious bystander were to suggest some express provision, they would both reply, "oh, of
course." See, eg:

       Wilson v Best Travel [1993] 1 All ER 353.

(ii) Relationship Between the Parties/Terms Implied by Law

In certain relationships and contracts the law seeks to impose a model or standardised set of
terms as a form of regulation. Such terms arising from the relationship between the parties will
be implied as of law. See:

       Liverpool City Council v Irwin [1976] 2 All ER 39.




(C) TERMS IMPLIED BY STATUTE

SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979

Implied terms about title -

Section 12 provides:

(1) In a contract of sale … there is an implied term on the part of the seller that in the case of a
sale he has a right to sell the goods, and in the case of an agreement to sell he will have such a
right at the time when the property is to pass.

(2) In a contract of sale … there is also an implied term that-

(a) the goods are free, and will remain free until the time when the property is to pass, from any
charge or encumbrance not disclosed or known to the buyer before the contract is made, and
(b) the buyer will enjoy quiet possession of the goods except so far as it may be disturbed by the
owner of or other person entitled to the benefit of any charge or encumbrance so disclosed or
known.

The term implied by s12(1) is a condition and the term implied by s12(2) is a warranty: s12(5A).

                                                                                           Page 6 of 9
Sale by description -

Section 13 provides:

(1) Where there is a contract for the sale of goods by description, there is an implied term that the
goods will correspond with the description.

(1A) … the term implied by subsection (1) above is a condition.

(2) If the sale is by sample as well as by description it is not sufficient that the bulk of the goods
corresponds with the sample if the goods do not also correspond with the description.

Implied terms about quality or fitness -

Section 14 provides:

(2) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business, there is an implied term that the
goods supplied under the contract are of satisfactory quality.

(2A) … goods are of satisfactory quality if they meet the standard that a reasonable person would
regard as satisfactory, taking account of any description of the goods, the price (if relevant) and
all other relevant circumstances.

(2B) … the quality of goods includes their state and condition and the following (among others)
are in appropriate cases aspects of the quality of goods -

(a) fitness for the purposes for which goods of the kind in question are commonly supplied,
(b) appearance and finish,
(c) freedom from minor defects,
(d) safety, and
(e) durability.


(2C) The term implied by subsection (2) above does not extend to any matter making the quality
of goods unsatisfactory -

(a) which is specifically drawn to the buyer's attention before the contract is made,
(b) where the buyer examines the goods before the contract is made, which that examination
ought to reveal, or
(c) in the case of a contract for sale by sample, which would have been apparent on a reasonable
examination of the sample.

(3) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business and the buyer, expressly or by
implication, makes known -
                                                                                           Page 7 of 9
(a) to the seller …

any particular purpose for which the goods are being bought, there is an implied term that the
goods supplied under the contract are reasonably fit for that purpose, whether or not that is a
purpose for which such goods are commonly supplied, except where the circumstances show that
the buyer does not rely, or that it is unreasonable for him to rely, on the skill or judgment of the
seller …

The terms implied by sections 14(2) and (3) are conditions: s14(6)

Sale by sample -

Section 15 provides:

(2) In the case of a contract for sale by sample there is an implied term -

(a) that the bulk will correspond with the sample in quality;
(c) that the goods will be free from any defect, making their quality unsatisfactory, which would
not be apparent on reasonable examination of the sample.

The term implied by s15(2) is a condition: s15(3).

Modification of remedies for breach of condition in non-consumer cases -

Section 15A provides:

(1) Where in the case of a contract of sale -

(a) the buyer would, apart from this subsection, have the right to reject goods by reason of a
breach on the part of the seller of a term implied by sections 13, 14 or 15 above, but
(b) the breach is so slight that it would be unreasonable for him to reject them,then, if the buyer
does not deal as a consumer, the breach is not to be treated as a breach of condition but may be
treated as a breach of warranty.

(2) This section applies unless a contrary intention appears in, or is to be implied from, the
contract.

(3) It is for the seller to show that a breach fell within subsection (1)(b) above.




                                                                                          Page 8 of 9
SUPPLY OF GOODS AND SERVICES ACT 1982

Implied term about care and skill -

Section 13 provides:

In a contract for the supply of a service where the supplier is acting in the course of a business,
there is an implied term that the supplier will carry out the service with reasonable care and skill.

Implied term about time for performance -

Section 14 provides:

(1) Where, under a contract for the supply of a service by a supplier acting in the course of a
business, the time for the service to be carried out is not fixed by the contract, left to be fixed in a
manner agreed by the contract or determined by the course of dealing between the parties, there
is an implied term that the supplier will carry out the service within a reasonable time.

(2) What is reasonable time is a question of fact.

Implied term about consideration -

Section 15 provides:

(1) Where, under a contract for the supply of a service, the consideration for the service is not
determined by the contract, left to be determined in a manner agreed by the contract or
determined by the course of dealing between the parties, there is an implied term that the party
contracting with the supplier will pay a reasonable charge.

(2) What is a reasonable charge is a question of fact.




                                                                                            Page 9 of 9

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

LAW501: Equity & Trust: Equitable Remedies Notes
LAW501: Equity & Trust: Equitable Remedies NotesLAW501: Equity & Trust: Equitable Remedies Notes
LAW501: Equity & Trust: Equitable Remedies NotesDania
 
Remedies
RemediesRemedies
RemediesFAROUQ
 
Intention L.Relation
Intention L.RelationIntention L.Relation
Intention L.Relationtheacademist
 
Misrepresentation and Fraud
Misrepresentation and FraudMisrepresentation and Fraud
Misrepresentation and FraudPreeti Sikder
 
Discharge of the contract
Discharge of the contractDischarge of the contract
Discharge of the contractAjit Kumar
 
Discharge of contract- Business law
Discharge  of  contract- Business lawDischarge  of  contract- Business law
Discharge of contract- Business lawshrinivas kulkarni
 
Alpacas of America, LLC v. Groome
Alpacas of America, LLC v. GroomeAlpacas of America, LLC v. Groome
Alpacas of America, LLC v. GroomeChad Jenkins
 
General Principles of Offer and Invitation to Treat
General Principles of Offer and Invitation to TreatGeneral Principles of Offer and Invitation to Treat
General Principles of Offer and Invitation to TreatPreeti Sikder
 
Wagner v. Columbia
Wagner v. ColumbiaWagner v. Columbia
Wagner v. ColumbiaChad Jenkins
 
Arbitration Presentation2009
Arbitration Presentation2009Arbitration Presentation2009
Arbitration Presentation2009apdh1312
 
Lecture 8 Collateral Contracts - Notes
Lecture 8   Collateral Contracts - NotesLecture 8   Collateral Contracts - Notes
Lecture 8 Collateral Contracts - NotesRamona Vansluytman
 
Ll1 slides indefeasibility part 2
Ll1 slides indefeasibility part 2Ll1 slides indefeasibility part 2
Ll1 slides indefeasibility part 2xareejx
 
Secret trust
Secret trustSecret trust
Secret trustFAROUQ
 
Misrepresentation in contract
Misrepresentation in contractMisrepresentation in contract
Misrepresentation in contractPatrick Aboku
 
Trust slide-compiled
Trust slide-compiledTrust slide-compiled
Trust slide-compiledSnj SNj
 
Lecture 11 misrepresentation - cases
Lecture 11   misrepresentation - casesLecture 11   misrepresentation - cases
Lecture 11 misrepresentation - casesRamona Vansluytman
 
administration and trust - duties
administration and trust - dutiesadministration and trust - duties
administration and trust - dutiesFAROUQ
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

LAW501: Equity & Trust: Equitable Remedies Notes
LAW501: Equity & Trust: Equitable Remedies NotesLAW501: Equity & Trust: Equitable Remedies Notes
LAW501: Equity & Trust: Equitable Remedies Notes
 
Remedies
RemediesRemedies
Remedies
 
Intention L.Relation
Intention L.RelationIntention L.Relation
Intention L.Relation
 
Lecture 10 mistake - notes
Lecture 10   mistake - notesLecture 10   mistake - notes
Lecture 10 mistake - notes
 
Misrepresentation and Fraud
Misrepresentation and FraudMisrepresentation and Fraud
Misrepresentation and Fraud
 
Discharge of the contract
Discharge of the contractDischarge of the contract
Discharge of the contract
 
Discharge of contract- Business law
Discharge  of  contract- Business lawDischarge  of  contract- Business law
Discharge of contract- Business law
 
Alpacas of America, LLC v. Groome
Alpacas of America, LLC v. GroomeAlpacas of America, LLC v. Groome
Alpacas of America, LLC v. Groome
 
General Principles of Offer and Invitation to Treat
General Principles of Offer and Invitation to TreatGeneral Principles of Offer and Invitation to Treat
General Principles of Offer and Invitation to Treat
 
Wagner v. Columbia
Wagner v. ColumbiaWagner v. Columbia
Wagner v. Columbia
 
Arbitration Presentation2009
Arbitration Presentation2009Arbitration Presentation2009
Arbitration Presentation2009
 
Lecture 8 Collateral Contracts - Notes
Lecture 8   Collateral Contracts - NotesLecture 8   Collateral Contracts - Notes
Lecture 8 Collateral Contracts - Notes
 
Offer & acceptance offer
Offer & acceptance   offerOffer & acceptance   offer
Offer & acceptance offer
 
Ll1 slides indefeasibility part 2
Ll1 slides indefeasibility part 2Ll1 slides indefeasibility part 2
Ll1 slides indefeasibility part 2
 
Secret trust
Secret trustSecret trust
Secret trust
 
Misrepresentation in contract
Misrepresentation in contractMisrepresentation in contract
Misrepresentation in contract
 
Trust slide-compiled
Trust slide-compiledTrust slide-compiled
Trust slide-compiled
 
Law notes ( Torts and Contract)
Law notes ( Torts and Contract)Law notes ( Torts and Contract)
Law notes ( Torts and Contract)
 
Lecture 11 misrepresentation - cases
Lecture 11   misrepresentation - casesLecture 11   misrepresentation - cases
Lecture 11 misrepresentation - cases
 
administration and trust - duties
administration and trust - dutiesadministration and trust - duties
administration and trust - duties
 

Destacado

Lecture 2 cases on formation of a contract
Lecture 2   cases on formation of a contractLecture 2   cases on formation of a contract
Lecture 2 cases on formation of a contractRamona Vansluytman
 
Lecture 8 Exclusion and Limiting Clauses - Notes
Lecture 8   Exclusion and Limiting Clauses - NotesLecture 8   Exclusion and Limiting Clauses - Notes
Lecture 8 Exclusion and Limiting Clauses - NotesRamona Vansluytman
 
Lecture 1 introduction to the law of contract
Lecture 1   introduction to the law of contractLecture 1   introduction to the law of contract
Lecture 1 introduction to the law of contractRamona Vansluytman
 
Lecture 2 formation of a contract
Lecture 2   formation of a contractLecture 2   formation of a contract
Lecture 2 formation of a contractRamona Vansluytman
 
Lecture 15 conditions, warranties and implied terms
Lecture 15 conditions, warranties and implied termsLecture 15 conditions, warranties and implied terms
Lecture 15 conditions, warranties and implied termsfatima d
 
Lecture 8 Exclusion and Limiting Clauses - Cases
Lecture 8   Exclusion and Limiting Clauses - CasesLecture 8   Exclusion and Limiting Clauses - Cases
Lecture 8 Exclusion and Limiting Clauses - CasesRamona Vansluytman
 
L ecture 3 consideration - notes
L ecture 3   consideration - notesL ecture 3   consideration - notes
L ecture 3 consideration - notesRamona Vansluytman
 
Lecture 2 offer - case law summary list
Lecture 2   offer - case law summary listLecture 2   offer - case law summary list
Lecture 2 offer - case law summary listRamona Vansluytman
 
Contracts terms - express, implied, incorporation
Contracts terms - express, implied, incorporationContracts terms - express, implied, incorporation
Contracts terms - express, implied, incorporationFrancois Brun
 
Lecture 3 study notes - contract law
Lecture 3   study notes - contract lawLecture 3   study notes - contract law
Lecture 3 study notes - contract lawRamona Vansluytman
 
Types of contract
Types of contractTypes of contract
Types of contractSweetp999
 

Destacado (20)

Contract Terms
Contract TermsContract Terms
Contract Terms
 
Lecture 2 cases on formation of a contract
Lecture 2   cases on formation of a contractLecture 2   cases on formation of a contract
Lecture 2 cases on formation of a contract
 
Implied terms
Implied termsImplied terms
Implied terms
 
Lecture 8 Exclusion and Limiting Clauses - Notes
Lecture 8   Exclusion and Limiting Clauses - NotesLecture 8   Exclusion and Limiting Clauses - Notes
Lecture 8 Exclusion and Limiting Clauses - Notes
 
Express terms
Express termsExpress terms
Express terms
 
Terms of the contract cases
Terms of the contract   casesTerms of the contract   cases
Terms of the contract cases
 
Lecture 13 duress - cases
Lecture 13   duress - casesLecture 13   duress - cases
Lecture 13 duress - cases
 
Lecture 13 duress - notes
Lecture 13   duress - notesLecture 13   duress - notes
Lecture 13 duress - notes
 
Lecture 1 introduction to the law of contract
Lecture 1   introduction to the law of contractLecture 1   introduction to the law of contract
Lecture 1 introduction to the law of contract
 
Lecture 2 formation of a contract
Lecture 2   formation of a contractLecture 2   formation of a contract
Lecture 2 formation of a contract
 
Lecture 15 conditions, warranties and implied terms
Lecture 15 conditions, warranties and implied termsLecture 15 conditions, warranties and implied terms
Lecture 15 conditions, warranties and implied terms
 
Study notes contract law
Study notes   contract lawStudy notes   contract law
Study notes contract law
 
Lecture 8 Exclusion and Limiting Clauses - Cases
Lecture 8   Exclusion and Limiting Clauses - CasesLecture 8   Exclusion and Limiting Clauses - Cases
Lecture 8 Exclusion and Limiting Clauses - Cases
 
Terms of the contract notes
Terms of the contract   notesTerms of the contract   notes
Terms of the contract notes
 
L ecture 3 consideration - notes
L ecture 3   consideration - notesL ecture 3   consideration - notes
L ecture 3 consideration - notes
 
Lecture 2 offer - case law summary list
Lecture 2   offer - case law summary listLecture 2   offer - case law summary list
Lecture 2 offer - case law summary list
 
Contracts terms - express, implied, incorporation
Contracts terms - express, implied, incorporationContracts terms - express, implied, incorporation
Contracts terms - express, implied, incorporation
 
Notes on consideration
Notes on considerationNotes on consideration
Notes on consideration
 
Lecture 3 study notes - contract law
Lecture 3   study notes - contract lawLecture 3   study notes - contract law
Lecture 3 study notes - contract law
 
Types of contract
Types of contractTypes of contract
Types of contract
 

Similar a Terms of the contract notes

Parol Evidence Rule Contract Law Malaysia
Parol Evidence Rule Contract Law MalaysiaParol Evidence Rule Contract Law Malaysia
Parol Evidence Rule Contract Law MalaysiaAzri Nadiah
 
Discharge of contract lecture notes
Discharge of contract lecture notesDischarge of contract lecture notes
Discharge of contract lecture notesNana Agyemang
 
Business Law 1100Your pathway to Curtin. On campus. On tra.docx
Business Law 1100Your pathway to Curtin. On campus. On tra.docxBusiness Law 1100Your pathway to Curtin. On campus. On tra.docx
Business Law 1100Your pathway to Curtin. On campus. On tra.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
 
parol evidence rule and collateral contract
parol evidence rule and collateral contractparol evidence rule and collateral contract
parol evidence rule and collateral contractNur Farhana Ana
 
A Bird in the Hand Consideration and One-Sided Contract Modifications.pdf
A Bird in the Hand  Consideration and One-Sided Contract Modifications.pdfA Bird in the Hand  Consideration and One-Sided Contract Modifications.pdf
A Bird in the Hand Consideration and One-Sided Contract Modifications.pdfJessica Henderson
 
ABTRTN AGRMT ABRTN ACT 2005.pdf
ABTRTN AGRMT  ABRTN ACT 2005.pdfABTRTN AGRMT  ABRTN ACT 2005.pdf
ABTRTN AGRMT ABRTN ACT 2005.pdfTanjilaSultana3
 
Contract Law Test and Answers November 2017
Contract Law Test and Answers November 2017Contract Law Test and Answers November 2017
Contract Law Test and Answers November 2017msstephanielord
 
Assignments And Transfers Of Contractual Duties Integrating Theory And Practice
Assignments And Transfers Of Contractual Duties  Integrating Theory And PracticeAssignments And Transfers Of Contractual Duties  Integrating Theory And Practice
Assignments And Transfers Of Contractual Duties Integrating Theory And PracticeDarian Pruitt
 
The Instruments Of A Contract
The Instruments Of A ContractThe Instruments Of A Contract
The Instruments Of A ContractJasmine Culbreth
 
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to ContractsChapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to ContractsUAF_BA330
 
Contracts: characteristics and exercises
Contracts: characteristics and exercisesContracts: characteristics and exercises
Contracts: characteristics and exercisesegonzalezlara
 
Terms%20of%20Contract%20Updated.pptx
Terms%20of%20Contract%20Updated.pptxTerms%20of%20Contract%20Updated.pptx
Terms%20of%20Contract%20Updated.pptxKhanRana2
 
Terms of Contract Updated.ppt
Terms of Contract Updated.pptTerms of Contract Updated.ppt
Terms of Contract Updated.pptKhanRana2
 
Law Binding Contract
Law Binding ContractLaw Binding Contract
Law Binding ContractSandra Gibson
 

Similar a Terms of the contract notes (20)

Parol Evidence Rule Contract Law Malaysia
Parol Evidence Rule Contract Law MalaysiaParol Evidence Rule Contract Law Malaysia
Parol Evidence Rule Contract Law Malaysia
 
Constructing the Contract
Constructing  the ContractConstructing  the Contract
Constructing the Contract
 
Constructing the Contract
Constructing  the ContractConstructing  the Contract
Constructing the Contract
 
Discharge of contract lecture notes
Discharge of contract lecture notesDischarge of contract lecture notes
Discharge of contract lecture notes
 
Business Law 1100Your pathway to Curtin. On campus. On tra.docx
Business Law 1100Your pathway to Curtin. On campus. On tra.docxBusiness Law 1100Your pathway to Curtin. On campus. On tra.docx
Business Law 1100Your pathway to Curtin. On campus. On tra.docx
 
Ac 8
Ac 8Ac 8
Ac 8
 
Intention notes
Intention   notesIntention   notes
Intention notes
 
parol evidence rule and collateral contract
parol evidence rule and collateral contractparol evidence rule and collateral contract
parol evidence rule and collateral contract
 
A Bird in the Hand Consideration and One-Sided Contract Modifications.pdf
A Bird in the Hand  Consideration and One-Sided Contract Modifications.pdfA Bird in the Hand  Consideration and One-Sided Contract Modifications.pdf
A Bird in the Hand Consideration and One-Sided Contract Modifications.pdf
 
ABTRTN AGRMT ABRTN ACT 2005.pdf
ABTRTN AGRMT  ABRTN ACT 2005.pdfABTRTN AGRMT  ABRTN ACT 2005.pdf
ABTRTN AGRMT ABRTN ACT 2005.pdf
 
Contract Law Test and Answers November 2017
Contract Law Test and Answers November 2017Contract Law Test and Answers November 2017
Contract Law Test and Answers November 2017
 
Assignments And Transfers Of Contractual Duties Integrating Theory And Practice
Assignments And Transfers Of Contractual Duties  Integrating Theory And PracticeAssignments And Transfers Of Contractual Duties  Integrating Theory And Practice
Assignments And Transfers Of Contractual Duties Integrating Theory And Practice
 
The Instruments Of A Contract
The Instruments Of A ContractThe Instruments Of A Contract
The Instruments Of A Contract
 
Lecture 12 privity - notes
Lecture 12   privity - notesLecture 12   privity - notes
Lecture 12 privity - notes
 
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to ContractsChapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
 
Contracts: characteristics and exercises
Contracts: characteristics and exercisesContracts: characteristics and exercises
Contracts: characteristics and exercises
 
Terms%20of%20Contract%20Updated.pptx
Terms%20of%20Contract%20Updated.pptxTerms%20of%20Contract%20Updated.pptx
Terms%20of%20Contract%20Updated.pptx
 
Terms of Contract Updated.ppt
Terms of Contract Updated.pptTerms of Contract Updated.ppt
Terms of Contract Updated.ppt
 
Quantum Meruit
Quantum MeruitQuantum Meruit
Quantum Meruit
 
Law Binding Contract
Law Binding ContractLaw Binding Contract
Law Binding Contract
 

Más de Ramona Vansluytman

Lecture 3 consideration - cases
Lecture 3   consideration - casesLecture 3   consideration - cases
Lecture 3 consideration - casesRamona Vansluytman
 
Lecture 3 study notes - contract law
Lecture 3   study notes - contract lawLecture 3   study notes - contract law
Lecture 3 study notes - contract lawRamona Vansluytman
 
Lecture 3 consideration - cases
Lecture 3   consideration - casesLecture 3   consideration - cases
Lecture 3 consideration - casesRamona Vansluytman
 
Lecture 14 undue influence - cases
Lecture 14   undue influence - casesLecture 14   undue influence - cases
Lecture 14 undue influence - casesRamona Vansluytman
 
Lecture 14 undue influence - notes
Lecture 14   undue influence - notesLecture 14   undue influence - notes
Lecture 14 undue influence - notesRamona Vansluytman
 
Lecture 9 capacity - notes and cases
Lecture 9   capacity - notes and casesLecture 9   capacity - notes and cases
Lecture 9 capacity - notes and casesRamona Vansluytman
 
Gratuitous payments further notes on edwards v skyways case
Gratuitous payments   further notes on edwards v skyways caseGratuitous payments   further notes on edwards v skyways case
Gratuitous payments further notes on edwards v skyways caseRamona Vansluytman
 
Certainty and completeness notes
Certainty and completeness   notesCertainty and completeness   notes
Certainty and completeness notesRamona Vansluytman
 

Más de Ramona Vansluytman (11)

Lecture 3 consideration - cases
Lecture 3   consideration - casesLecture 3   consideration - cases
Lecture 3 consideration - cases
 
Lecture 3 study notes - contract law
Lecture 3   study notes - contract lawLecture 3   study notes - contract law
Lecture 3 study notes - contract law
 
Lecture 3 consideration - cases
Lecture 3   consideration - casesLecture 3   consideration - cases
Lecture 3 consideration - cases
 
Lecture 2 agreement chart
Lecture 2   agreement chartLecture 2   agreement chart
Lecture 2 agreement chart
 
Lecture 14 undue influence - cases
Lecture 14   undue influence - casesLecture 14   undue influence - cases
Lecture 14 undue influence - cases
 
Lecture 14 undue influence - notes
Lecture 14   undue influence - notesLecture 14   undue influence - notes
Lecture 14 undue influence - notes
 
Lecture 10 mistake - cases
Lecture 10   mistake - casesLecture 10   mistake - cases
Lecture 10 mistake - cases
 
Lecture 9 capacity - notes and cases
Lecture 9   capacity - notes and casesLecture 9   capacity - notes and cases
Lecture 9 capacity - notes and cases
 
Gratuitous payments further notes on edwards v skyways case
Gratuitous payments   further notes on edwards v skyways caseGratuitous payments   further notes on edwards v skyways case
Gratuitous payments further notes on edwards v skyways case
 
Certainty and completeness notes
Certainty and completeness   notesCertainty and completeness   notes
Certainty and completeness notes
 
Intention case law
Intention   case lawIntention   case law
Intention case law
 

Último

Riddhi Kevadiya. WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE....
Riddhi Kevadiya. WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE....Riddhi Kevadiya. WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE....
Riddhi Kevadiya. WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE....Riddhi Kevadiya
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptxPrescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptxraviapr7
 
Slides CapTechTalks Webinar March 2024 Joshua Sinai.pptx
Slides CapTechTalks Webinar March 2024 Joshua Sinai.pptxSlides CapTechTalks Webinar March 2024 Joshua Sinai.pptx
Slides CapTechTalks Webinar March 2024 Joshua Sinai.pptxCapitolTechU
 
Department of Health Compounder Question ‍Solution 2022.pdf
Department of Health Compounder Question ‍Solution 2022.pdfDepartment of Health Compounder Question ‍Solution 2022.pdf
Department of Health Compounder Question ‍Solution 2022.pdfMohonDas
 
A gentle introduction to Artificial Intelligence
A gentle introduction to Artificial IntelligenceA gentle introduction to Artificial Intelligence
A gentle introduction to Artificial IntelligenceApostolos Syropoulos
 
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfP4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfYu Kanazawa / Osaka University
 
Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptxClinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptxraviapr7
 
10 Topics For MBA Project Report [HR].pdf
10 Topics For MBA Project Report [HR].pdf10 Topics For MBA Project Report [HR].pdf
10 Topics For MBA Project Report [HR].pdfJayanti Pande
 
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptxmary850239
 
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?TechSoup
 
How to Create a Toggle Button in Odoo 17
How to Create a Toggle Button in Odoo 17How to Create a Toggle Button in Odoo 17
How to Create a Toggle Button in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Education and training program in the hospital APR.pptx
Education and training program in the hospital APR.pptxEducation and training program in the hospital APR.pptx
Education and training program in the hospital APR.pptxraviapr7
 
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...raviapr7
 
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 SalesHow to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 SalesCeline George
 
KARNAADA.pptx made by - saransh dwivedi ( SD ) - SHALAKYA TANTRA - ENT - 4...
KARNAADA.pptx  made by -  saransh dwivedi ( SD ) -  SHALAKYA TANTRA - ENT - 4...KARNAADA.pptx  made by -  saransh dwivedi ( SD ) -  SHALAKYA TANTRA - ENT - 4...
KARNAADA.pptx made by - saransh dwivedi ( SD ) - SHALAKYA TANTRA - ENT - 4...M56BOOKSTORE PRODUCT/SERVICE
 
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
 

Último (20)

Riddhi Kevadiya. WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE....
Riddhi Kevadiya. WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE....Riddhi Kevadiya. WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE....
Riddhi Kevadiya. WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE....
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
 
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptxPrescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
 
Slides CapTechTalks Webinar March 2024 Joshua Sinai.pptx
Slides CapTechTalks Webinar March 2024 Joshua Sinai.pptxSlides CapTechTalks Webinar March 2024 Joshua Sinai.pptx
Slides CapTechTalks Webinar March 2024 Joshua Sinai.pptx
 
Department of Health Compounder Question ‍Solution 2022.pdf
Department of Health Compounder Question ‍Solution 2022.pdfDepartment of Health Compounder Question ‍Solution 2022.pdf
Department of Health Compounder Question ‍Solution 2022.pdf
 
A gentle introduction to Artificial Intelligence
A gentle introduction to Artificial IntelligenceA gentle introduction to Artificial Intelligence
A gentle introduction to Artificial Intelligence
 
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfP4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
 
Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptxClinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
 
10 Topics For MBA Project Report [HR].pdf
10 Topics For MBA Project Report [HR].pdf10 Topics For MBA Project Report [HR].pdf
10 Topics For MBA Project Report [HR].pdf
 
Prelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quiz
Prelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quizPrelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quiz
Prelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quiz
 
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
How to Add Existing Field in One2Many Tree View in Odoo 17
 
3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptx
 
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
 
How to Create a Toggle Button in Odoo 17
How to Create a Toggle Button in Odoo 17How to Create a Toggle Button in Odoo 17
How to Create a Toggle Button in Odoo 17
 
Education and training program in the hospital APR.pptx
Education and training program in the hospital APR.pptxEducation and training program in the hospital APR.pptx
Education and training program in the hospital APR.pptx
 
Finals of Kant get Marx 2.0 : a general politics quiz
Finals of Kant get Marx 2.0 : a general politics quizFinals of Kant get Marx 2.0 : a general politics quiz
Finals of Kant get Marx 2.0 : a general politics quiz
 
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
Patient Counselling. Definition of patient counseling; steps involved in pati...
 
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 SalesHow to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
 
KARNAADA.pptx made by - saransh dwivedi ( SD ) - SHALAKYA TANTRA - ENT - 4...
KARNAADA.pptx  made by -  saransh dwivedi ( SD ) -  SHALAKYA TANTRA - ENT - 4...KARNAADA.pptx  made by -  saransh dwivedi ( SD ) -  SHALAKYA TANTRA - ENT - 4...
KARNAADA.pptx made by - saransh dwivedi ( SD ) - SHALAKYA TANTRA - ENT - 4...
 
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17
 

Terms of the contract notes

  • 1. TERMS OF THE CONTRACT 1a. THE PAROL EVIDENCE RULE The parol evidence rule is that where the record of a transaction is embodied in a document, extrinsic evidence is not generally admissible to vary or interpret the document or as a substitute for it. According to GH Treitel, The Law of Contract, 9th ed. p176, there are obvious grounds of convenience for the application of the parol evidence rule to contracts: certainty is promoted by holding that parties who have reduced a contract to writing should be bound by the writing and by the writing alone. On the other hand, the parol evidence rule will commonly be invoked where a dispute arises after the time of contracting as to what was actually said at that time; and in such cases one of the parties could feel aggrieved if evidence on the point were excluded merely because the disputed term was not set out in the contractual document. Evidence extrinsic to the document is therefore admitted in a number of situations which fall outside the scope of the rule. 1b. EXCEPTIONS TO THE PAROL EVIDENCE RULE: (A) WRITTEN AGREEMENT NOT THE WHOLE AGREEMENT If the written agreement was not intended to be the whole contract on which the parties had actually agreed, parol evidence is admissible. See: Evans v Andrea Merzario [1976] 2 All ER 930. (B) VALIDITY Parol evidence may be given about the validity of the contract, eg to establish the presence or absence of consideration or of contractual intention, or some invalidating cause such as incapacity, misrepresentation, mistake or non est factum. (C) IMPLIED TERMS Where the contract is silent on a matter on which a term is normally implied by law, parol evidence may be given to support, or to rebut, the usual implication. See: Burges v Wickham (1836) 3 B & S 669 Page 1 of 9
  • 2. (D) OPERATION OF THE CONTRACT Parol evidence can be used to show that the contract does not yet operate, or that it has ceased to operate. See: Pym v Campbell (1856) 6 E & B 370. (E) EVIDENCE AS TO PARTIES Parol evidence can be used to show in what capacities the parties contracted, eg where a person contracts ostensibly as principal, evidence is admissible to prove that he really acted as another's agent so as to entitle the latter to sue (Humfrey v Dale (1857) 7 E & B 266). (F) AID TO CONSTRUCTION Where the words of the contract are clear, parol evidence cannot be used to explain their meaning, unless they have a special meaning by custom. Parol evidence can, on the other hand, be used to explain words or phrases which are ambiguous, or which, if taken literally, make no sense, as well as technical terms. (G) TO PROVE CUSTOM Evidence of custom is admissible "to annex incidents to written contracts in matters with respect to which they are silent." (Hutton v Warren (1836). Custom can also be used as an aid to construction, eg in Smith v Wilson (1832) evidence was admitted of a local custom to show that "1,000 rabbits" meant "1,200 rabbits." (H) RECTIFICATION A document may fail in accurately recording the true agreement. Equity allows such a written contract to be rectified by parol evidence. (See handout on Mistake) (I) COLLATERAL CONTRACT Even though parol evidence cannot be used to vary or add to the terms of a written contract, it may be possible to show that the parties made two related contracts, one written and the other oral, ie a collateral contract. See: City & Westminster Properties v Mudd [1959] Ch 129. The Law Commission (1976) recommended that the rule should be abolished, but by 1986 concluded that it did not stop the courts accepting parol evidence if this was consistent with the intention of the parties. Page 2 of 9
  • 3. 2a. REPRESENTATIONS AND TERMS The first step in determining the terms of a contract is to establish what the parties said or wrote. Statements made during the course of negotiations may traditionally be classed as representations or terms and if one turns out to be wrong, the plaintiff's remedy will depend on how the statement is classified: A representation is a statement of fact made by one party which induces the other to enter into the contract. If it turns out to be incorrect the innocent party may sue for misrepresentation. Breach of a term of the contract entitles the injured party to claim damages and, if he has been deprived substantially what he bargained for, he will also be able to repudiate the contract. If a statement is not a term of the principal contract, it is possible that it may be enforced as a collateral contract (which has developed rapidly in the twentieth century as a significant means by which the difficulties of fixing a statement with contractual force may be circumvented). How can the courts decide whether a statement is a term or a mere representation? It was established in Heilbut, Symons & Co v Buckleton [1913] AC 30, that intention is the overall guide as to whether a statement is a term of the contract. In seeking to implement the parties' intentions and decide whether a statement is a term or a mere representation, the courts will consider the following four factors: (A) TIMING The court will consider the lapse of time between the making of the statement and the contract's conclusion: if the interval is short the statement is more likely to be a term. See: Routledge v McKay [1954] 1 WLR 615 Schawel v Reade [1913] 2 IR 64. (B) IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT The court will consider the importance of the truth of the statement as a pivotal factor in finalising the contract. The statement may be of such importance that if it had not been made the injured party would not have entered into the contract at all. See: Bannerman v White (1861) CB(NS) 844 Couchman v Hill [1947] 1 All ER 103. Page 3 of 9
  • 4. (C) REDUCTION OF TERMS TO WRITING The court will consider whether the statement was omitted in a later, formal contract in writing. If the written contract does not incorporate the statement, this would suggest that the parties did not intend the statement to be a contractual term. See: Routledge v McKay [1954] 1 WLR 615 Birch v Paramount Estates (1956) 167. (D) SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE/SKILLS The court will consider whether the maker of the statement had specialist knowledge or was in a better position than the other party to verify the statement's accuracy. See: Harling v Eddy [1951] 2 KB 739 Oscar Chess v Williams [1957] 1 All ER 325 Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith Motors [1965] 2 All ER 65. 2b. CONDITIONS AND WARRANTIES Traditionally terms have been divided into two categories: conditions and warranties. (A) CONDITIONS A condition is a major term which is vital to the main purpose of the contract. A breach of condition will entitle the injured party to repudiate the contract and claim damages. The injured party may also choose to go on with the contract, despite the breach, and recover damages instead. See: Poussard v Spiers (1876) 1 QBD 410 (Note: The word 'condition' also has another meaning. It may mean a stipulation that a contract should not be enforceable except on the happening of a given event, or should be brought to an end on the happening of a given event. The condition is then properly called a 'condition precedent', or a 'condition subsequent' respectively. See Cheshire &Fifoot, p153-4). (B) WARRANTIES A warranty is a less important term: it does not go to the root of the contract. A breach of warranty will only give the injured party the right to claim damages; he cannot repudiate the contract. See: Page 4 of 9
  • 5. Bettini v Gye (1876) 1 QBD 183. (C) INTERMEDIATE TERMS It may be impossible to classify a term neatly in advance as either a condition or a warranty. Some undertakings may occupy an intermediate position, in that the term can be assessed only in the light of the consequences of a breach. If a breach of the term results in severe loss and damage, the injured party will be entitled to repudiate the contract; where the breach involves minor loss, the injured party's remedies will be restricted to damages. These intermediate terms have also become known as innominate terms. See: Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha [1962] 1 All ER 474 The MihalisAngelos [1971] 1 QB 164 The Hansa Nord [1976] QB 44 Reardon Smith Line v Hansen-Tangen [1976] 3 All ER 570 Bunge Corporation v Tradax Export [1981] 2 All ER 513. (D) NOTE If the term is described in the contract as a 'condition' that will not be conclusive. See: Schuler v Wickman Machine Tools [1974] AC 235. 3. IMPLIED TERMS In most contracts the primary obligations of the parties are contained in express terms. In addition there are various circumstances in which extra terms may be implied into the agreement. A) TERMS IMPLIED BY CUSTOM The terms of a contract may have been negotiated against the background of the customs of a particular locality or trade. The parties automatically assume that their contract will be subject to such customs and so do not deal specifically with the matter in their contract. See: Hutton v Warren (1836) 1 M&W 466. B) TERMS IMPLIED BY THE COURT (i) Intention of the Parties/Terms Implied as Fact The courts will be prepared to imply a term into a contract in order to give effect to the obvious intentions of the parties. Sometimes the point at issue has been overlooked or the parties have Page 5 of 9
  • 6. failed to express their intention clearly. In these circumstances, the court will supply a term in the interests of 'business efficacy' so that the contract makes commercial sense. See: The Moorcock (1889) 14 PD 64. A more recent test is the 'officious bystander test' used to incorporate implied obvious terms (Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1940] AC 701). If while the parties were making their contract, an officious bystander were to suggest some express provision, they would both reply, "oh, of course." See, eg: Wilson v Best Travel [1993] 1 All ER 353. (ii) Relationship Between the Parties/Terms Implied by Law In certain relationships and contracts the law seeks to impose a model or standardised set of terms as a form of regulation. Such terms arising from the relationship between the parties will be implied as of law. See: Liverpool City Council v Irwin [1976] 2 All ER 39. (C) TERMS IMPLIED BY STATUTE SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979 Implied terms about title - Section 12 provides: (1) In a contract of sale … there is an implied term on the part of the seller that in the case of a sale he has a right to sell the goods, and in the case of an agreement to sell he will have such a right at the time when the property is to pass. (2) In a contract of sale … there is also an implied term that- (a) the goods are free, and will remain free until the time when the property is to pass, from any charge or encumbrance not disclosed or known to the buyer before the contract is made, and (b) the buyer will enjoy quiet possession of the goods except so far as it may be disturbed by the owner of or other person entitled to the benefit of any charge or encumbrance so disclosed or known. The term implied by s12(1) is a condition and the term implied by s12(2) is a warranty: s12(5A). Page 6 of 9
  • 7. Sale by description - Section 13 provides: (1) Where there is a contract for the sale of goods by description, there is an implied term that the goods will correspond with the description. (1A) … the term implied by subsection (1) above is a condition. (2) If the sale is by sample as well as by description it is not sufficient that the bulk of the goods corresponds with the sample if the goods do not also correspond with the description. Implied terms about quality or fitness - Section 14 provides: (2) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business, there is an implied term that the goods supplied under the contract are of satisfactory quality. (2A) … goods are of satisfactory quality if they meet the standard that a reasonable person would regard as satisfactory, taking account of any description of the goods, the price (if relevant) and all other relevant circumstances. (2B) … the quality of goods includes their state and condition and the following (among others) are in appropriate cases aspects of the quality of goods - (a) fitness for the purposes for which goods of the kind in question are commonly supplied, (b) appearance and finish, (c) freedom from minor defects, (d) safety, and (e) durability. (2C) The term implied by subsection (2) above does not extend to any matter making the quality of goods unsatisfactory - (a) which is specifically drawn to the buyer's attention before the contract is made, (b) where the buyer examines the goods before the contract is made, which that examination ought to reveal, or (c) in the case of a contract for sale by sample, which would have been apparent on a reasonable examination of the sample. (3) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business and the buyer, expressly or by implication, makes known - Page 7 of 9
  • 8. (a) to the seller … any particular purpose for which the goods are being bought, there is an implied term that the goods supplied under the contract are reasonably fit for that purpose, whether or not that is a purpose for which such goods are commonly supplied, except where the circumstances show that the buyer does not rely, or that it is unreasonable for him to rely, on the skill or judgment of the seller … The terms implied by sections 14(2) and (3) are conditions: s14(6) Sale by sample - Section 15 provides: (2) In the case of a contract for sale by sample there is an implied term - (a) that the bulk will correspond with the sample in quality; (c) that the goods will be free from any defect, making their quality unsatisfactory, which would not be apparent on reasonable examination of the sample. The term implied by s15(2) is a condition: s15(3). Modification of remedies for breach of condition in non-consumer cases - Section 15A provides: (1) Where in the case of a contract of sale - (a) the buyer would, apart from this subsection, have the right to reject goods by reason of a breach on the part of the seller of a term implied by sections 13, 14 or 15 above, but (b) the breach is so slight that it would be unreasonable for him to reject them,then, if the buyer does not deal as a consumer, the breach is not to be treated as a breach of condition but may be treated as a breach of warranty. (2) This section applies unless a contrary intention appears in, or is to be implied from, the contract. (3) It is for the seller to show that a breach fell within subsection (1)(b) above. Page 8 of 9
  • 9. SUPPLY OF GOODS AND SERVICES ACT 1982 Implied term about care and skill - Section 13 provides: In a contract for the supply of a service where the supplier is acting in the course of a business, there is an implied term that the supplier will carry out the service with reasonable care and skill. Implied term about time for performance - Section 14 provides: (1) Where, under a contract for the supply of a service by a supplier acting in the course of a business, the time for the service to be carried out is not fixed by the contract, left to be fixed in a manner agreed by the contract or determined by the course of dealing between the parties, there is an implied term that the supplier will carry out the service within a reasonable time. (2) What is reasonable time is a question of fact. Implied term about consideration - Section 15 provides: (1) Where, under a contract for the supply of a service, the consideration for the service is not determined by the contract, left to be determined in a manner agreed by the contract or determined by the course of dealing between the parties, there is an implied term that the party contracting with the supplier will pay a reasonable charge. (2) What is a reasonable charge is a question of fact. Page 9 of 9