2. ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS
How does a scientist view truth?
How do we know when a scientific theory is
true?
How do belief systems and society influence
perceptions of truth?
3. An important question…
The power of questions.
The power of the IC Curiosity!
http://www.youtube.
com/watch?v=F8U
FGu2M2gM&featur
e=g-hist
6. Kuhn‘s theory on how we do
science
According to Kuhn the development of a
science is not uniform but has alternating
‘normal’ and ‗revolutionary’ phases.
Kuhn argued that science is not a steady
process of accumulation of knowledge.
Instead, science is "a series of peaceful
interludes punctuated by intellectually violent
revolutions”
7.
8. Kuhn‘s theory on how we do
science
The central idea of Kuhn‘s theory is that the
development of science is driven, in normal
periods of science, by adherence to what Kuhn
called a ‗paradigm‘.
A paradigm guides and informs the fact-
gathering (experiments and observations
described in journals) decisions of
researchers
9. Normal Science
During periods of normal science, the primary
task of scientists is to bring the accepted
theory and fact into closer agreement.
As a consequence, scientists tend to ignore
research findings that might threaten the
existing paradigm and trigger the development
of a new and competing paradigm
10. The Paradigm and Zeitgeist
entanglement
What is the Zeitgeist?
Zeit·geist (tstgst, zt-)n. The spirit of the time; the
taste and outlook characteristic of a period or
generation.
12. Paradigms
Scientists doing ―normal science‖ will articulate
and develop the paradigm in their attempt to
account for and accommodate the behaviour
of aspects of the real world as shown through
the results of experimentation.
13. The Cycle of Scientific
Revolution
revolution
normal
a new paradigm science
emerges and a paradigm is
gains the formed and
approval of the accepted
scientific
community
crisis
an anomaly
appears that
can‘t be
explained using
the current
paradigm
15. Anomalies
Anomaly: An occurrence that is strange,
unusual, or unique. It is a discrepancy or
deviation from an established rule, trend or
pattern
An anomaly forces the scientific community to
complete further research to try to explain the
anomaly within the current paradigm. If it
cannot be, the paradigm finds itself in a state
of crisis.
16. Crisis
All crises begin with the blurring of a paradigm
and the consequent loosening of the rules for
normal research
Crises are resolved in one of three ways:
1. Normal science can prove capable of handling
the crisis-provoking problem, in which case all
returns to "normal."
2. The problem persists but it is thought to be as a
result of the field's failure to possess the
necessary tools with which to solve it. Scientists
set it aside for a future generation with more
developed tools.
3. A new candidate for paradigm emerges and a
battle over its acceptance begins in the scientific
17. Scientific Revolution
A scientific revolution that results in paradigm
change is similar to a political revolution:
*Political revolutions begin with a growing sense by
members of the community that existing institutions
have ceased adequately to meet the problems
posed by the current environment —anomaly and
crisis
18. Scientific Revolution
A scientific revolution that results in paradigm
change is similar to a political revolution:
*As a political crisis deepens, individuals commit
themselves to some concrete proposal for the
reconstruction of society – forming a new paradigm
19. Scientific Revolution
A scientific revolution that results in paradigm
change is similar to a political revolution:
*Those with opposing political ideals attempt to sway
the majority in their favour – paradigm wars and,
eventually, scientific consensus on a new paradigm
23. Scientific Revolution in
Astronomy
Imagine…
The prevailing
theory of the
structure of the
universe is a geo-
centric one.
The philosopher and
scientist Ptolemy
first proposed the
idea in the year
150 A.D.
24. Scientific Revolution in
Astronomy
In the early 16th
Century, nearly 1400
years after Ptolemy‘s
work, Nicolaus
Copernicus
challenged this
paradigm with his
own ideas on the
universe
Geo-centric = existing
paradigm
25. Scientific Revolution in
Astronomy
Copernicus was not Crisis – anomalies
convinced that the are encountered
explanations which cannot be
Ptolemy and his readily explained
supporters
presented actually
explained the
motion of the
planets and stars.
26. Scientific Revolution in
Astronomy
He spent years
observing,
experimenting and
theorising until he
was ready to make
a commitment to a
new possible
paradigm – a helio-
centric model of the
universe
27. Scientific Revolution in
Astronomy
Copernicus had kept
his ideas relatively
quiet throughout his
life and it was only
on his deathbed in
1543 that he could
claim that his new
paradigm had been
revealed to the
scientific community
28. Scientific Revolution in
Astronomy
Consider the social climate into which Copernicus‘
1543 book was released…
The Copernican model appeared to be contrary to
common sense and to contradict the Bible – man
is the reason for and at the centre of the universe
Ptolemy‘s geo-centric paradigm had been in
favour for such a long time already
Also, Copernicus‘ observations were much the
same as those of fellow astronomers. The
observations said nothing new, it was the need for
a more complete and simplistic system that drove
Copernicus‘ curiousity
29. Scientific Revolution in
Astronomy
It was for these
reasons that
Copernicus‘ theory
did not bring about a
revolution at first.
There were only ten
Copernicans
between 1543 and
1600. The most
famous you may
know – Galileo
Galilei
30. Scientific Revolution in
Astronomy
The universe model Anomalies still exist
paradigm crisis had
been momentarily but crisis has been
resolved as per one stalled
of Kuhn‘s possible
crisis resolution
categories – although
some liked the theory,
the field of astronomy
was not yet advanced
enough to prove any
reason it should
succeed the old
paradigm
31. Scientific Revolution in
Astronomy
It took until the end of Advances in science
the 17th century, with help to resurface
the new discoveries in Copernicus‘ identified
astronomy and other anomalies crisis
fields by Galileo, revolution new
Johannes Kepler and paradigm - the
Isaac Newton, for heliocentric model of
Copernicus‘ work to the universe
again bring the geo-
centric model into
crisis and finally
prevail as the new
paradigm
33. Scientific Revolution in Physics
Pierre Gassendi , an
atomist, proposed a
particle theory of
light which was
published after his
death in the 1660s.
ie. Gassendi proposed
that light acted as
though made up of
many small particles
34. Scientific Revolution in Physics
Isaac Newton
studied Gassendi's
work at an early age
and stated in his
Hypothesis of Light
of 1675 that light
was composed of
corpuscles (particles
of matter) which
were emitted in all
directions from a
source
35. Scientific Revolution in Physics
Newton's theory could Particle theory of
be used to predict the light – current
reflection of light, but
could only explain paradigm
refraction (bending)
using an assumption
later to be proved
false.
His reputation helped
the particle theory of
light to hold sway
during the 18th
century
36. Scientific Revolution in Physics
In the 1660s, Robert Anomalies appear in
Hooke published a the current paradigm
wave theory of light, causing crisis – a new
followed by fellow paradigm emerges from
physicists Christiaan scientific revolution –
Huygens and Thomas the wave theory of light
Young.
The wave theory was
wildly successful in
explaining nearly all
optical and
electromagnetic
phenomena, and was a
great triumph of
nineteenth century
physics
37. Scientific Revolution in Physics
By the late nineteenth New crisis in the
century, however, a current paradigm!
handful of
experimental
anomalies remained
that could not be
explained by or were
in direct conflict with
the wave theory. One
of these anomalies
involved a
controversy over the
speed of light
38. Scientific Revolution in Physics
In 1905, Albert
Einstein was able to
resolve the crisis
facing the current
paradigm of wave
theory.
Using his famous
theory of relativity,
Einstein was able to
explain that light
could in fact act like
a wave and a
particle
39. E=MC2
One of Einstein's In one kilogram of pure
great insights was to water, the mass of
realize that matter hydrogen atoms amounts
and energy are really to just slightly more than
different forms of the
same thing. Matter
111 grams, or 0.111 kg.
can be turned into E=MC2
energy, and energy = 0.111 x 300,000,000(m/s
into matter. ) x 300,000,000(m/s)
= 10,000,000,000,000,000
Joules
40.
41. Scientific Revolution in Physics
In what became the old paradigm –
new paradigm for wave theory
the nature of light, new paradigm –
Einstein particle/wave duality
demonstrated how
light could show the
properties of
particles (eg.
straight line travel,
reflection), and
waves (eg.
diffraction)
43. Quantum Physics and that darn
cat!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCOE__
N6v4o
44. Big Bang Theory
We certainly know that
our universe exists,
however, this knowledge
alone has not satisfied
the quest for further
understanding.
Our curiosity has led us
to question our place in
this universe and
furthermore, the place of
the universe itself.
Throughout time we have
asked ourselves these
questions:
How did our universe
begin?
How old is our
universe?
How did matter come to
exist?
45. Big Bang Theory
These are not simple
questions and
throughout our brief
history on this planet
much time and effort
has been spent
looking for some clue.
Yet, after all this
energy has been
expended, much of
what we know is still
only speculation.
54. Where theories Collide and
Accelerate!
The Large Hadron Collider, Cerne Switzerland
―The big revolutions in science sometimes occur when we realise we don't
know anything.! Director of CERN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQNpucos9
wc
57. Art Vs Science
Science as Art
Art is Science
The infinite connection of Art and
Science
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbhNaj88uL
58. ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS
How do we know when a scientific theory is true?
How does a scientist view truth?
The Most astounding Fact!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9
D05ej8u-gU
59. And after all this, we still must be
humbled by a surrender to Great
Mystery...
whilst also trusting the power of
continual questioning.
?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SWvD
HvWXok
Science refers to a system of acquiring knowledge. This system uses observation and experimentation to describe and explain natural phenomenaThe purpose of science is to produce useful models of realityPrevailing scientific theories are dependent upon the time and place in which they are created. Things such as religion and politics can play a big part in the types of scientific theories that appear throughout the course of history
Studying the history of science is an exceptional way to show the humanity of science. By looking at the history we can clearly see two things: that science can be wrong and that it doesn't always work in the short term.Understanding the foundations of science can be a big help in evaluating the usefulness of modern scientific claims.Through studying the history of science, we learn how it really works. The arguments can be oddly petty and at times life-destroying , yet they're how ideas are beaten from rough thoughts to finely honed, scientifically valid ideasOur theories about the world did not just pop into existence; they have been debated and argued over by many great minds, and have been shaped not only by the science, but also the politics and culture of the day
A strange turn of phrase but that is often how it is referred to in the history and philosophy of science!
Thomas Kuhn: one of the most influential philosophers of science of the twentieth century,hisThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions is one of the most cited academic books of all time
His account of the development of science held that science enjoys periods of stable growth punctuated by revisionary revolutions
A paradigm guides and informs the fact-gathering (experiments and observations described in journals) decisions of researchersA paradigm coordinates and directs the “puzzle solving” activity of the groups of normal scientists who work within it.
In the pursuit of science, Kuhn observed, "novelty emerges only with difficulty, manifested by resistance, against a background provided by expectation.“ He is saying that in order to find something that does not fit we must first have a paradigm in which to make it fit.
Doing research is essentially like solving a puzzle. Puzzles have rules. Puzzles generally have predetermined solutions.The man who is striving to solve a problem defined by existing knowledge and technique is not just looking around. He knows what he wants to achieve, and he designs his instruments and directs his thoughts accordingly"
Normal science is done when a paradigm has been chosen by the scientific community (a consensus is reached)A crisis emerges when observations outside of what is expected are observed and can’t be explainedWhen this crisis can’t be averted by further testing or slight alteration of the current paradigm, a revolution can take place. This is where a new paradigm is presented to and accepted by the scientific community The new paradigm then becomes the basis for normal science
It is interesting to note that failure to achieve the expected solution to a puzzle discredits only the scientist and not the theory ("it is a poor carpenter who blames his tools").
It is interesting to note that failure to achieve the expected solution to a puzzle discredits only the scientist and not the theory ("it is a poor carpenter who blames his tools").
All paradigms will be inadequate to some extent as far as their match with nature is concerned. When the mismatch becomes serious, that is, when a crisis developsThe third resolution is where scientific revolution comes into play
During scientific revolutions, scientists see new and different things when looking with familiar instruments in places they have looked before.Such scientific revolutions come only after long periods of tradition-bound normal science, for “paradigms must be lived with and explored before they can be replaced." And yet, young scientists who are not so deeply indoctrinated into accepted theories (perhaps because they have not spent their lives trying to support and prove the existing paradigm.
During scientific revolutions, scientists see new and different things when looking with familiar instruments in places they have looked before.Such scientific revolutions come only after long periods of tradition-bound normal science, for “paradigms must be lived with and explored before they can be replaced." And yet, young scientists who are not so deeply indoctrinated into accepted theories (perhaps because they have not spent their lives trying to support and prove the existing paradigm.
Stars were embedded in a large outer sphere which rotated rapidly, approximately daily, while each of the planets, the Sun, and the Moon were embedded in their own, smaller spheres
Science refers to a system of acquiring knowledge. This system uses observation and experimentation to describe and explain natural phenomenaThe purpose of science is to produce useful models of realityPrevailing scientific theories are dependent upon the time and place in which they are created. Things such as religion and politics can play a big part in the types of scientific theories that appear throughout the course of history