Land management practices are used for a wide range of purposes to modify and fragment native vegetation at sites and to transform vegetated landscapes. Land management targets indicators of vegetation structure, species composition and regenerative capacity. A framework is presented enabling the gains and losses of native vegetation to be tracked over time at site and landscape scales.
A framework for assessing and reporting resilience of native vegetation
1. A framework for assessing and
reporting resilience of native vegetation
Richard Thackway
Lecture presented as part of the Managing Forested Landscapes
an undergraduate course , ENVS3041 Class number 4029.
Fenner School of Environment and Society, ANU
2 March 2016
2. Outline
• Concepts and definitions
• Why & how land managers change their landscapes
• A standardised system for assessing and reporting resilience
• The VAST methodology site and landscape
• Case studies - Cumberland State Forest, Sydney
• Lessons
• Conclusions
3. Goals of land managers
Values and decisions matrix:
• Social
• Economic
• Environmental
Intensification
Degradation?
4. Goals of land managers
Values and decisions matrix:
• Social
• Economic
• Environmental
Extensification
Restoration
5. Regulation ofhydrologicalregime
Generation offood and fibre
Regulation ofclimate / microclimate
Generation ofraw materials
Recyclingoforganic matter
Creating and regulatinghabitats
Controllingreproductionand dispersal
Changing ecological function to derive multiple benefits (ecosystem
services)
6. A framework for assessing and reporting
vegetation resilience
7. Definitions
• Change in a plant community type due to effects of land
management practices:
– Structure
– Composition
– Regenerative capacity
• Resilience = capacity of an plant community to recover toward
a reference state following change/s in land management
• Transformation = changes to vegetation condition over time
• Condition, resilience and transformation are assessed relative
to fully natural a reference state
Vegetation condition
8. Land managers affect native veg condition
in space and over time
Process:
Land managers use land management practices (LMP) to
influence ecological function at sites and the landscape by:
• Modifying
• Removing and replacing
• Enhancing
• Restoring
• Maintaining
• Improving
Purpose/s:
To achieve the desired mix of ecosystem services (space & time)
11. Understanding states and transitions
(space and time)
Indigenous
land
management
First
explorers
Grazing
Degreeof
modification
Logging
Cropping
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3
Time
Reference state
Long
term
rainfall
Long term
disturbance
e.g. wildfire,
cyclones
Revegetation
VAST
states The same ecosystem e.g. eucalypt open forest with different management histories
t2t1
t3
12. Land managers change 10 key criteria affecting the
resilience of a plant community
Soil
Vegetation
Regenerative capacity/ function
Vegetation structure &
Species composition
1. Soil hydrological status
2. Soil physical status
3. Soil chemical status
4. Soil biological status
5. Fire regime
6. Reproductive potential
7. Overstorey structure
8. Understorey structure
9. Overstorey composition
10. Understorey composition
13. VAST = Vegetation Assets States and Transitions
NVIS = National Vegetation Information System
VIVIVIIIIII0
Native vegetation
cover
Non-native vegetation
cover
Increasing modification caused by use and management
Transitions = trend
Vegetation
thresholds
Reference for
each veg type
(NVIS)
A framework for assessing & reporting
changes in plant communities
Condition states
Residual or
unmodified
Naturally
bare
Modified Transformed Replaced -
Adventive
Replaced -
managed
Replaced -
removed
Thackway & Lesslie (2008) Environmental
Management, 42, 572-90
Diagnostic attributes of VAST states:
• Vegetation structure
• Species composition
• Regenerative capacity
NVIS
18. Synthesising information using a hierarchy
• Level 1: Scores over time
• Level 2: Components
• Level 3: Criteria
• Level 4: Indicators
• Level 5: Field measures/observations (Direct) and Expert /inference
models (Indirect)
19. Components
(Level 2)
Criteria
(Level 3)
Description of loss or gain relative to pre settlement indicator reference state
(Level 4)Regenerativecapacity
Fire regime Change in the area /size of fire foot prints
Change in the number of fire starts
Soil hydrology Change in the soil surface water availability
Change in the ground water availability
Soil physical
state
Change in the depth of the A horizon
Change in soil structure.
Soil nutrient
state
Nutrient stress – rundown (deficiency) relative to soil fertility
Nutrient stress – excess (toxicity) relative to soil fertility
Soil biological
state
Change in the recyclers responsible for maintaining soil porosity and nutrient recycling
Change in surface organic matter, soil crusts
Reproductive
potential
Change in the reproductive potential of overstorey structuring species
Change in the reproductive potential of understorey structuring species
Vegetationstructure
Overstorey
structure
Change in the overstorey top height (mean) of the plant community
Change in the overstorey foliage projective cover (mean) of the plant community
Change in the overstorey structural diversity (i.e. a diversity of age classes) of the stand
Understorey
structure
Change in the understorey top height (mean) of the plant community
Change in the understorey ground cover (mean) of the plant community
Change in the understorey structural diversity (i.e. a diversity of age classes) of the plant
Species
Composition
Overstorey
composition
Change in the densities of overstorey species functional groups
Change in no.s of indigenous overstorey species relative to the number of exotic species
Understorey
composition
Change in the densities of understorey species functional groups
Change in no.s of indigenous understorey species relative to the number of exotic species
20. Generate total indices for ‘transformation site’ for each year of the
historical record. Validate using Expert Knowledge
• Compile and collate effects of land
management on criteria (10) and
indicators (22) over time.
• Evaluate impacts on the plant
community over time
Transformation site
• Compile and collate effects of
land management on criteria
(10) and indicators (22)
Reference state/sites
Score all 22 indicators for ‘transformation site’ relative to the
‘reference site’. 0 = major change; 1 = no change
Derive weighted indices for the ‘transformation site’ i.e. regenerative
capacity (55%), vegetation structure (27%) and species composition (18%)
by adding predefined indicators
General process for tracking change over time
using the VAST-2 system
27. Cumberland State Forest 1941-2012
Red boundary shows
main compartments
that were cleared as
per the 1943 aerial
photograph. This area
was fully planted out
around 1944 as part
of the arboretum.
Except for regrowth
forests: i.e.
compartments 8a, 9a,
9b and 10b
Transect 2 = T2
Compartments
42. NSW, SB Bioregion, Cumberland SF, Transect 2 (ex-comp 3a, 7a, 7b, 7c)
Reference pre-European: Sydney Blue Gum High Forest
Commenced
managing
area for
recreation.
Weed control.
Arboretum
abandoned
Cleared &
sown to
improved
pasture for
grazing &
orchard
Commenced
grazing
native
pastures
Indigenous
people
manage the
area
Grazed area
gazetted as
State Forest,
commenced
planting
arboretum
Area
logged for
building
houses
and fences
Commenced
managing area
as a future
production
forest. Weed
control
Explorers
traverse
the area
and site
selected
Ceased
grazing.
Area
purchased
as a future
working
forest
Modified
Transformed
Replaced/
managed or
removed
Residual
Replaced
/adventive
VAST
43. VAST
Unmodified
Commenced
managing
area
primarily
for
recreation
Ceased
grazing.
Purchased &
declared as a
State forest
Site fenced.
Commenced
continuous
stocking
with cattle
Commenced
grazing cattle
Indigenous
people
manage the
area
Cleared and
commenced
regrowing
native forest
as a future
forest
production
Tree cover
thinned
for cattle
grazing
Initiated 1st
hazard
reduction
burn
Trees
logged for
housing,
fences &
fire wood
NSW, SB Bioregion, Cumberland SF, Transect 1 (ex-comp 8b, 9a, 9b)
Reference pre-European: Sydney Blue Gum High Forest
44. • Network of collaborators
• Ecologists, land managers, academics, research scientists,
environmental historians
• Inputs
• Reference state
• Historical record of land use & Land management practices
• Historical record of major natural events e.g. droughts, fires, floods,
cyclones, average rainfall 1900-2012
• Observed interactions e.g. rabbits, sheep and drought
• Observations and quantitative measures of effects
• Include written, oral, artistic, photographic and remote sensing
Lessons: Resources needed at site level
45. Lessons: site vs landscape
1. Constrain assessments to soil landscape units because this
approximates to land manager’s
2. Must account for major natural events e.g. flood, fire, cyclone
3. Remote sensing is only part of the solution –
a) Some measures of remote sensing e.g. greenness of crown health may not be
directly related to vegetation condition
4. Tracking outcomes of management interventions
a) Must collect on-ground data and have a model for linking change to datasets
derived from remote sensing
46. Lessons: What is the baseline?
Zero/constant baseline (e.g. environmental planting)
A measure or estimate (red line) that would
have occurred in the absence of an
activity/intervention e.g.
Response
variable/s
Time
Start of
activity/
intervention
Time
Varying baseline (e.g. environmental watering)
Response
variable/s
Single intervention &
climatic variability
Baseline
Response to activity/ intervention
Indicator 13: Overstorey height
Indicator 4: ground water
47. Lessons: Importance of dynamics
Assume rainfall is main driver of natural system dynamics
• Period 1900 - 2013
• Average seasonal rainfall (summer, autumn, …)
• Rainfall anomaly is calculated above and below the mean
• Two year running trend line fitted
49. Conclusions
• A framework that helps decision makers assess and report change at
sites and landscapes due to human management and natural drivers
• A tool (i.e. VAST) for assisting in reporting on the current status of
Australia’s vegetation types - used in
– National State of the Environment Report (2011)
• An accounting tool (VAST-2) for reporting change and trend in the
transformation of vegetation types at sites - used in
– National State of the Forests Report (2013)
– Regional Environmental Accounts (Wentworth Group of Concerned
Scientists 2015)
50. More info & Acknowledgements
More information
http://www.vasttransformations.com/
http://portal.tern.org.au/search
http://aceas-data.science.uq.edu.au/portal/
Acknowledgements
• Many public and private land managers, land management agencies,
consultants and researchers have assisted in the development of VAST & VAST-2