SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 36
Descargar para leer sin conexión
34
TOTAL
POPULATION
INTERNET
USERS
ACTIVE SOCIAL
MEDIA USERS
UNIQUE
MOBILE USERS
ACTIVE MOBILE
SOCIAL USERS
URBANISATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION:
JAN
2018 A SNAPSHOT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY DIGITAL STATISTICAL INDICATORS
SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG;
FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING;
TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION (ALL AGES).
DIGITAL IN INDONESIA
265.4 132.7 130.0 177.9 120.0
MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
56% 50% 49% 67% 45%
35
INTERNET
USERS
ACTIVE SOCIAL
MEDIA USERS
UNIQUE
MOBILE USERS
ACTIVE MOBILE
SOCIAL USERS
JAN
2018 YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN KEY STATISTICAL INDICATORS
ANNUAL DIGITAL GROWTH
SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017
SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG;
FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING;
TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. GROWTH DATA: WE ARE SOCIAL & HOOTSUITE’S DIGITAL IN 2017 REPORT.
0% +23% +1% +30%
(UNCHANGED) +24 MILLION +2 MILLION +28 MILLION
36
TOTAL
POPULATION
FEMALE
POPULATION
MALE
POPULATION
MEDIAN
AGE
JAN
2018
POPULATION & ECONOMIC INDICATORSESSENTIAL DEMOGRAPHICS AND KEY ECONOMIC INDICATORS
ANNUAL CHANGE IN
POPULATION SIZE
POPULATION LIVING
IN URBAN AREAS
GDP PER
CAPITA
LITERACY
(TOTAL)
MALE
LITERACY
FEMALE
LITERACY
SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; US CENSUS BUREAU; UNESCO; WORLD BANK, IMF; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK.
265.4 49.7% 50.3% +1.1% 30.5
MILLION YEARS OLD
56% $11,632 94% 92% 96%
37
MOBILE PHONE
(ANY TYPE)
SMART
PHONE
LAPTOP OR
DESKTOP COMPUTER
TABLET
COMPUTER
JAN
2018
DEVICE USAGEPERCENTAGE OF THE ADULT POPULATION* THAT CURRENTLY USES EACH KIND OF DEVICE [SURVEY-BASED]
TELEVISION
(ANY KIND)
DEVICE FOR STREAMING
INTERNET CONTENT TO TV
E-READER
DEVICE
WEARABLE
TECH DEVICE
SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS
ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS.
91% 60% 22% 8%
95% 2% 1% 1%
38
AVERAGE DAILY TIME
SPENT USING THE
INTERNET VIA ANY DEVICE
AVERAGE DAILY TIME
SPENT USING SOCIAL
MEDIA VIA ANY DEVICE
AVERAGE DAILY TV VIEWING TIME
(BROADCAST, STREAMING
AND VIDEO ON DEMAND)
AVERAGE DAILY TIME
SPENT LISTENING TO
STREAMING MUSIC
JAN
2018
TIME SPENT WITH MEDIASURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT RESPONDENTS’ SELF-REPORTED ACTIVITY
SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64.
NOTE: TIME SPENT USING SOCIAL MEDIA INCLUDES SOCIAL NETWORKS AS WELL AS MESSENGERS / CHAT APPS.
8H 51M 3H 23M 2H 45M 1H 19M
39
BELIEVE THAT NEW
TECHNOLOGIES OFFER MORE
OPPORTUNITIES THAN RISKS
PREFER TO COMPLETE
TASKS DIGITALLY
WHENEVER POSSIBLE
BELIEVE DATA PRIVACY
AND PROTECTION ARE
VERY IMPORTANT
DELETE COOKIES FROM
INTERNET BROWSER
TO PROTECT PRIVACY
JAN
2018
ATTITUDES TOWARDS DIGITALHOW INTERNET USERS* PERCEIVE THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY, AND THEIR PERSPECTIVE ON PRIVACY ISSUES
USE AN AD-BLOCKING
TOOL TO STOP ADVERTS
BEING DISPLAYED
SOURCES: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018; GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3, 2017. NOTES: GOOGLE FIGURES BASED ON A SURVEY OF ADULT
INTERNET USERS. SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON METHODOLOGY AND AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. GLOBALWEBINDEX
FIGURES BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. *NOTE: THESE FIGURES ONLY REPRESENT THE ATTITUDES AND ACTIVITIES OF INTERNET USERS.
71% 68% 79% 57% 50%
40
TOTAL NUMBER
OF ACTIVE
INTERNET USERS
INTERNET USERS AS A
PERCENTAGE OF THE
TOTAL POPULATION
TOTAL NUMBER
OF ACTIVE MOBILE
INTERNET USERS
MOBILE INTERNET USERS
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
THE TOTAL POPULATION
JAN
2018
INTERNET USEBASED ON REPORTED INTERNET USER DATA, AND USER-CLAIMED MOBILE INTERNET USE
SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES;
REPUTABLE MEDIA; GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. NOTES: GLOBALWEBINDEX DATA IS BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64, BUT DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW
TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. PENETRATION FIGURES BASED ON POPULATION DATA FROM THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE U.S. CENSUS BUREAU.
132.7 50% 124.8 47%
MILLION MILLION
41
INTERNET
WORLD STATS
ITU (INTERNATIONAL
TELECOMMUNICATION UNION)
INTERNET
LIVE STATS
JAN
2018
INTERNET USERS: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVESREPORTS OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS FROM DIFFERENT DATA PROVIDERS
CIA WORLD
FACTBOOK
SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION (ITU); INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; ALL LATEST REPORTED FIGURES AS OF JANUARY 2018.
132.7 67.3 53.2 67.4
MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
42
EVERY
DAY
AT LEAST ONCE
PER WEEK
AT LEAST ONCE
PER MONTH
LESS THAN ONCE
PER MONTH
JAN
2018
FREQUENCY OF INTERNET USEHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS ACCESS THE INTERNET FOR PERSONAL REASONS (ANY DEVICE)
1 7 31 ?
SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS
ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS.
VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS, OR DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA.
79% 14% 6% 1%
43
AVERAGE INTERNET
SPEED VIA FIXED
CONNECTIONS
AVERAGE INTERNET
SPEED VIA MOBILE
CONNECTIONS
ACCESS THE INTERNET
MOST OFTEN VIA A
COMPUTER OR TABLET
ACCESS EQUALLY VIA
A SMARTPHONE AND
COMPUTER OR TABLET
JAN
2018
INTERNET CONNECTIONS: SPEED & DEVICESAVERAGE INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS, AND THE DEVICE THAT PEOPLE USE MOST OFTEN TO ACCESS THE INTERNET
ACCESS THE INTERNET
MOST OFTEN VIA A
SMARTPHONE
SOURCES: OOKLA SPEEDTEST, NOVEMBER 2017; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. GOOGLE’S FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY.
NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S
METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DEVICE USAGE PERCENTAGES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS.
13.79 9.82 3% 6% 81%
MBPS MBPS
44
LAPTOPS &
DESKTOPS
MOBILE
PHONES
TABLET
DEVICES
OTHER
DEVICES
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE:
JAN
2018
SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY DEVICEBASED ON EACH DEVICE’S SHARE OF ALL WEB PAGES SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE:
SOURCES: STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2018, AND STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2017.
26% 72% 2% [N/A]
-8% +5% -34% [N/A]
45
JAN
2018
SIMILARWEB’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY TRAFFIC TO EACH WEBSITE IN Q4 2017
SOURCE: SIMILARWEB, JANUARY 2018, BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY DATA FOR Q4 2017. NOTES: MONTHLY TRAFFIC REPRESENTS TOTAL VISITS TO EACH SITE, NOT UNIQUE VISITORS.
DATA FOR SOME COUNTRIES REPRESENTS DESKTOP TRAFFIC, WHILST OTHERS REPRESENTS TRAFFIC FROM BOTH DESKTOP AND MOBILE DEVICES. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES
REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES.
# WEBSITE CATEGORY MONTHLY TRAFFIC TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
GOOGLE.CO.ID SEARCH 2,915,900,000 9M 02S 7.5
GOOGLE.COM SEARCH 1,180,700,000 5M 32S 4.9
FACEBOOK.COM SOCIAL 1,174,100,000 12M 27S 14.2
BLOGSPOT.CO.ID BLOGS 692,300,000 4M 32S 2.2
GOOGLEWEBLIGHT.COM SEARCH 577,600,000 7M 49S 4.8
YOUTUBE.COM TV & VIDEO 558,900,000 23M 02S 11.3
LINE.ME SOCIAL 220,300,000 1M 52S 2.1
DETIK.COM NEWS & MEDIA 201,200,000 6M 45S 4.4
WORDPRESS.COM BLOGS 166,300,000 2M 51S 1.8
YAHOO.COM NEWS & MEDIA 142,900,000 5M 46S 5.0
46
JAN
2018
ALEXA’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF VISITORS TO EACH SITE, AND THE NUMBER OF PAGES VIEWED ON EACH SITE PER VISIT
# WEBSITE TIME PAGES
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
# WEBSITE TIME PAGES
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SOURCE: ALEXA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: ‘TIME’ REPRESENTS TIME SPENT ON SITE PER DAY. ‘PAGES’ REPRESENTS NUMBER OF PAGE VIEWS PER DAY. ALEXA USES A COMBINATION OF AVERAGE
DAILY VISITORS AND PAGE VIEWS OVER A ONE-MONTH PERIOD TO CALCULATE ITS RANKING. RANKINGS ON THIS SLIDE ARE BASED ON THE MONTH TO 16 JANUARY 2018. ADVISORY: SOME
WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES.
GOOGLE.CO.ID 6M 28S 8.44
GOOGLE.COM 7M 32S 8.56
YOUTUBE.COM 8M 18S 4.79
DETIK.COM 10M 27S 6.79
TRIBUNNEWS.COM 6M 05S 3.57
TOKOPEDIA.COM 13M 08S 7.41
FACEBOOK.COM 10M 21S 4.00
BUKALAPAK.COM 8M 34S 5.13
YAHOO.COM 4M 02S 3.61
LIPUTAN6.COM 4M 57S 2.19
KOMPAS.COM 7M 05S 3.27
KASKUS.CO.ID 7M 02S 3.77
KAPANLAGI.COM 5M 32S 4.14
BRILIO.NET 4M 05S 1.90
LAZADA.CO.ID 4M 24S 3.26
MERDEKA.COM 5M 38S 2.51
SINDONEWS.COM 4M 04S 2.59
UZONE.ID 1M 40S 2.49
IDNTIMES.COM 2M 52S 1.76
KUMPARAN.COM 2M 42S 1.38
47
USE A SEARCH
ENGINE
VISIT A SOCIAL
NETWORK
PLAY
GAMES
WATCH
VIDEOS
JAN
2018
WEEKLY ONLINE ACTIVITIES BY DEVICEPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION* ENGAGING IN EACH ACTIVITY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK [SURVEY-BASED]
LOOK FOR PRODUCT
INFORMATION
SMARTPHONE:
COMPUTER:
SMARTPHONE:
COMPUTER:
SMARTPHONE:
COMPUTER:
SMARTPHONE:
COMPUTER:
SMARTPHONE:
COMPUTER:
SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY
RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S
METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE.
19% 37% 7% 18% 8%
4% 6% 2% 3% 1%
48
JAN
2018
TOP GOOGLE SEARCH QUERIES IN 2017RANKING OF THE TOP SEARCH TERMS ENTERED INTO GOOGLE’S SEARCH ENGINE THROUGHOUT 2017
# QUERY INDEX
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
# QUERY INDEX
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE ‘INDEX’ COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE VOLUME FOR EACH QUERY
COMPARED TO THE SEARCH VOLUME FOR THE TOP QUERY (AN INDEX OF 50 MEANS THAT THE QUERY RECEIVED 50% OF THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY).
DOWNLOAD 100
LAGU 96
FB 59
VIDEO 52
DOWNLOAD LAGU 40
FACEBOOK 39
GOOGLE 35
GAMBAR 33
MP3 31
TRANSLATE 29
YOUTUBE 29
FILM 27
YT 23
TOGEL 15
GOOGLE TRANSLATE 14
YOU 13
CUACA 10
GAME 10
BERITA 10
GMAIL 10
49
WATCH ONLINE
VIDEOS EVERY DAY
WATCH ONLINE
VIDEOS EVERY WEEK
WATCH ONLINE
VIDEOS EVERY MONTH
WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS
LESS THAN ONCE A MONTH
JAN
2018
FREQUENCY OF WATCHING ONLINE VIDEOHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS (ANY DEVICE)
NEVER WATCH
ONLINE VIDEOS
1 7 31 365 X
SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS
ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS.
21% 24% 21% 13% 20%
50
REGULAR
TELEVISION
ON A TV SET
RECORDED
CONTENT
ON A TV SET
CATCH-UP /
ON-DEMAND
SERVICE ON TV SET
ONLINE CONTENT
STREAMED ON
A TV SET
JAN
2018
HOW INTERNET USERS WATCH TELEVISIONCOMPARISON OF THE METHODS AND DEVICES USED FOR ACCESSING AND DISPLAYING ‘TELEVISION’ CONTENT
ONLINE CONTENT
STREAMED ON
ANOTHER DEVICE
SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS
ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS.
98% 6% 5% 7% 7%
51
TOTAL NUMBER
OF ACTIVE SOCIAL
MEDIA USERS
ACTIVE SOCIAL USERS
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
THE TOTAL POPULATION
TOTAL NUMBER
OF SOCIAL USERS
ACCESSING VIA MOBILE
ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL
USERS AS A PERCENTAGE
OF THE TOTAL POPULATION
JAN
2018
SOCIAL MEDIA USEBASED ON THE MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS REPORTED BY THE MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM IN EACH COUNTRY
SOURCES: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS
NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE.
130.0 49% 120.0 45%
MILLION MILLION
52
JAN
2018
MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMSSURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT USERS’ OWN CLAIMED / REPORTED ACTIVITY
SOCIAL NETWORK
MESSENGER / CHAT APP / VOIP
SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. NOTES: DATA FOR PLATFORMS WITH AN ASTERISK (*) IS COLLECTED IN A DIFFERENT PART
OF THE SURVEY TO OTHER PLATFORM DATA. ALL DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. ADVISORY: FIGURES ARE BASED ON RESPONSES
TO A SURVEY, AND MAY NOT CORRELATE TO SOCIAL MEDIA PENETRATION FIGURES SHOWN ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT; FOR FULL DETAILS, SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT.
43%
41%
40%
38%
33%
28%
27%
25%
24%
16%
15%
14%
YOUTUBE
FACEBOOK
WHATSAPP
INSTAGRAM
LINE
BBM
TWITTER
GOOGLE+
FB MESSENGER
LINKEDIN
SKYPE
WECHAT
53
TOTAL NUMBER OF
MONTHLY ACTIVE
FACEBOOK USERS
ANNUAL CHANGE IN
FACEBOOK USERS
vs. JANUARY 2017
PERCENTAGE OF
FACEBOOK USERS
ACCESSING VIA MOBILE
JAN
2018
FACEBOOK USAGE ANALYSISA CLOSER LOOK AT FACEBOOK USE, BROKEN DOWN BY MOBILE USE AND SELF-DECLARED GENDER OF USERS
SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018.
PERCENTAGE OF
FACEBOOK PROFILES
DECLARED AS FEMALE
PERCENTAGE OF
FACEBOOK PROFILES
DECLARED AS MALE
130.0 +23% 92% 44% 56%
MILLION
54
AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE
TOTAL
13 – 17
18 – 24
25 – 34
35 – 44
45 – 54
55 – 64
65+
FEMALE
MALE
PROFILE OF FACEBOOK USERSA BREAKDOWN OF THE COUNTRY’S FACEBOOK’S USERS BY AGE AND GENDER, IN MILLIONS
JAN
2018
SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: THE ‘TOTAL’ COLUMN OF THE INSET TABLE SHOWS ORIGINAL VALUES,
WHILE GRAPH VALUES HAVE BEEN DIVIDED BY ONE MILLION. TABLE PERCENTAGES REPRESENT THE RESPECTIVE GENDER AND AGE GROUP’S
SHARE OF TOTAL NATIONAL FACEBOOK USERS. TABLE VALUES MAY NOT SUM EXACTLY DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA.
13 – 17
YEARS OLD
65+
YEARS OLD
25 – 34
YEARS OLD
35 – 44
YEARS OLD
45 – 54
YEARS OLD
55 – 64
YEARS OLD
18 – 24
YEARS OLD
AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE
TOTAL 130,000,000 44% 56%
13 – 17 23,000,000 9% 9%
18 – 24 45,000,000 16% 19%
25 – 34 39,000,000 12% 18%
35 – 44 15,000,000 5% 7%
45 – 54 5,400,000 2% 2%
55 – 64 1,300,000 0.4% 0.6%
65+ 2,400,000 0.6% 1%
11.7
20.4
15.5
6.0
2.2
0.5 0.7
11.1
24.2
23.2
8.8
3.1
0.8
1.6
55
JAN
2018
AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE POST REACH
AVERAGE MONTHLY
CHANGE IN PAGE LIKES
AVERAGE POST REACH
vs. PAGE LIKES
AVERAGE ORGANIC
REACH vs. PAGE LIKES
PERCENTAGE OF PAGES
USING PAID MEDIA
AVERAGE MONTHLY GROWTH IN PAGE LIKES (‘FANS’), AVERAGE REACH OF PAGE POSTS vs. PAGE LIKES, AND PAID MEDIA
AVERAGE PAID REACH
vs. TOTAL REACH
SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: REACH FIGURES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF TIMES THAT A
POST WAS SERVED IN USERS’ NEWSFEEDS TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGE ‘FANS’ (I.E. USERS THAT HAD LIKED THE PAGE) AT THE TIME THAT THE POST WAS PUBLISHED.
+1.93% 7.8% 3.2% 33.2% 19.4%
56
AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT
RATE FOR FACEBOOK
PAGE POSTS (ALL TYPES)
AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT
RATE FOR FACEBOOK
PAGE VIDEO POSTS
AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT
RATE FOR FACEBOOK
PAGE PHOTO POSTS
AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT
RATE FOR FACEBOOK
PAGE LINK POSTS
JAN
2018
AVERAGE FACEBOOK ENGAGEMENT RATESTHE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ENGAGE WITH A FACEBOOK PAGE’S POSTS vs. THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT THOSE POSTS REACH
AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT
RATE FOR FACEBOOK
PAGE STATUS POSTS
SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: ENGAGEMENT RATES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO INTERACTED
WITH A POST TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIQUE USERS TO WHOM THAT POST WAS SERVED, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THOSE USERS WERE FANS OF THE PAGE AT THAT TIME.
4.16% 9.70% 8.55% 5.17% 4.65%
57
TOTAL NUMBER OF
MONTHLY ACTIVE
INSTAGRAM USERS
ACTIVE INSTAGRAM
USERS AS A PERCENTAGE
OF TOTAL POPULATION
FEMALE USERS AS A
PERCENTAGE OF ALL
ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS
MALE USERS AS A
PERCENTAGE OF ALL
ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS
JAN
2018
INSTAGRAM USAGE ANALYSISAN OVERVIEW OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS, BROKEN DOWN BY GENDER
SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF DATA FROM INSTAGRAM (VIA FACEBOOK), JANUARY 2018. PENETRATION RATES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE.
53.00 20% 49% 51%
MILLION
58
NUMBER OF UNIQUE
MOBILE USERS (ANY
TYPE OF HANDSET)
MOBILE PENETRATION
(UNIQUE USERS vs.
TOTAL POPULATION)
TOTAL NUMBER
OF MOBILE
CONNECTIONS
MOBILE CONNECTIONS
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL POPULATION
JAN
2018
MOBILE USERS vs. MOBILE CONNECTIONSCOMPARING THE NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS TO THE NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS
AVERAGE NUMBER OF
CONNECTIONS PER
UNIQUE MOBILE USER
SOURCES: UNIQUE MOBILE USERS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, JANUARY 2018; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018;
MOBILE CONNECTIONS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE.
177.9 67% 415.7 157% 2.34
MILLION MILLION
59
TOTAL NUMBER
OF MOBILE
CONNECTIONS
MOBILE CONNECTIONS
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL POPULATION
PERCENTAGE OF
MOBILE CONNECTIONS
THAT ARE PRE-PAID
PERCENTAGE OF
MOBILE CONNECTIONS
THAT ARE POST-PAID
PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE
CONNECTIONS THAT ARE
BROADBAND (3G & 4G)
JAN
2018
MOBILE CONNECTIONS BY TYPEBASED ON THE NUMBER OF CELLULAR CONNECTIONS (NOTE: NOT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS)
SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE.
415.7 157% 98% 2% 54%
MILLION
60
OVERALL COUNTRY
INDEX SCORE
MOBILE NETWORK
INFRASTRUCTURE
AFFORDABILITY OF
DEVICES & SERVICES
CONSUMER
READINESS
JAN
2018
MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEXGSMA INTELLIGENCE’S ASSESSMENT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY ENABLERS AND DRIVERS OF MOBILE CONNECTIVITY
AVAILABILITY OF RELEVANT
CONTENT & SERVICES
OUT OF A MAXIMUM
POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100
OUT OF A MAXIMUM
POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100
OUT OF A MAXIMUM
POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100
OUT OF A MAXIMUM
POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100
OUT OF A MAXIMUM
POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100
SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. TO ACCESS THE COMPLETE MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEX, VISIT HTTP://WWW.MOBILECONNECTIVITYINDEX.COM/
52.71 41.39 58.24 69.06 46.37
61
PERCENTAGE OF THE
POPULATION USING
MOBILE MESSENGERS
PERCENTAGE OF THE
POPULATION WATCHING
VIDEOS ON MOBILE
PERCENTAGE OF THE
POPULATION PLAYING
GAMES ON MOBILE
PERCENTAGE
OF THE POPULATION
USING MOBILE BANKING
JAN
2018
MOBILE ACTIVITIESSURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT RESPONDENTS’ SELF-REPORTED ACTIVITY
PERCENTAGE OF THE
POPULATION USING
MOBILE MAP SERVICES
SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64.
NOTE: DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE.
47% 43% 37% 27% 42%
62
USE THE ALARM
CLOCK FUNCTION
MANAGE DIARY
OR APPOINTMENTS
CHECK THE
WEATHER
TRACK HEALTH, DIET,
OR ACTIVITY LEVELS
JAN
2018
SMARTPHONE LIFE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIESPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION USING A SMARTPHONE TO PERFORM EACH TASK [SURVEY-BASED]
TAKE PHOTOS
OR VIDEOS
CHECK
THE NEWS
READ E-BOOKS
OR E-MAGAZINES
MANAGE LISTS
(E.G. SHOPPING, TASKS)
SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY
RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S
METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE.
17% 6% 4% 4%
44% 18% 3% 4%
63
JAN
2018
TOP APP RANKINGSRANKINGS OF TOP MOBILE APPS BY MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS AND BY NUMBER OF DOWNLOADS
RANKING OF MOBILE APPS BY MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS
# APP NAME DEVELOPER / COMPANY
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
RANKING OF MOBILE APPS BY NUMBER OF DOWNLOADS
# APP NAME DEVELOPER / COMPANY
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
SOURCE: APP ANNIE, JANUARY 2018, BASED ON DATA IN THE APP ANNIE 2017 RETROSPECTIVE REPORT. FOR MORE DETAILS, VISIT HTTPS://WWW.APPANNIE.COM/
NOTES: RANKINGS ARE BASED ON COMBINED DATA FOR BOTH THE APPLE iOS APP STORE AND THE GOOGLE PLAY APP STORE. MONTHLY ACTIVE USER RANKINGS ARE BASED
ON MONTHLY AVERAGES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: RANKINGS EXCLUDE PRE-INSTALLED APPS, SUCH AS YOUTUBE ON ANDROID DEVICES, AND SAFARI ON APPLE DEVICES.
WHATSAPP MESSENGER FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK FACEBOOK
INSTAGRAM FACEBOOK
LINE LINE
BBM BLACKBERRY
FACEBOOK MESSENGER FACEBOOK
SHAREIT SHAREIT
UC BROWSER ALIBABA GROUP
GO-JEK GO-JEK
GRAB GRAB
FACEBOOK FACEBOOK
WHATSAPP MESSENGER FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK MESSENGER FACEBOOK
UC BROWSER ALIBABA GROUP
SHAREIT SHAREIT
INSTAGRAM FACEBOOK
BBM BLACKBERRY
LINE LINE
GRAB GRAB
UC NEWS ALIBABA GROUP
64
HAS A BANK
ACCOUNT
HAS A
CREDIT CARD
MAKES AND / OR RECEIVES
MOBILE PAYMENTS VIA GSMA
MAKES ONLINE PURCHASES
AND / OR PAYS BILLS ONLINE
JAN
2018
FINANCIAL INCLUSION FACTORSPERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AGED 15+ THAT REPORTS OWNING OR USING EACH FINANCIAL PRODUCT OR SERVICE
PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN
WITH A CREDIT CARD
PERCENTAGE OF MEN
WITH A CREDIT CARD
PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN
MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS
PERCENTAGE OF MEN
MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS
SOURCE: WORLD BANK GLOBAL FINANCIAL INCLUSION DATA (2015). NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT THE PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE AGED 15+, NOT TOTAL POPULATION.
36% 2% 0.4% 5%
2% 1% 5% 6%
65
SEARCHED ONLINE
FOR A PRODUCT
OR SERVICE TO BUY
VISITED
AN ONLINE
RETAIL STORE
PURCHASED A
PRODUCT OR
SERVICE ONLINE
MADE AN ONLINE
PURCHASE VIA A LAPTOP
OR DESKTOP COMPUTER
JAN
2018
E-COMMERCE ACTIVITIES IN PAST 30 DAYSSURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT RESPONDENTS’ SELF-REPORTED ACTIVITY
MADE AN ONLINE
PURCHASE VIA A
MOBILE DEVICE
SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64.
NOTE: DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE.
45% 45% 40% 31% 31%
66
FASHION
& BEAUTY
ELECTRONICS &
PHYSICAL MEDIA
FOOD &
PERSONAL CARE
FURNITURE &
APPLIANCES
JAN
2018
E-COMMERCE SPEND BY CATEGORYTOTAL ANNUAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS
TOYS, DIY
& HOBBIES
TRAVEL (INCLUDING
ACCOMMODATION)
DIGITAL
MUSIC
VIDEO
GAMES
SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018.
NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND.
$2.466 $1.273 $0.593 $1.288
BILLION BILLION BILLION BILLION
$1.436 $2.417 $0.004 $0.792
BILLION BILLION BILLION BILLION
67
FASHION
& BEAUTY
ELECTRONICS &
PHYSICAL MEDIA
FOOD &
PERSONAL CARE
FURNITURE &
APPLIANCES
JAN
2018
E-COMMERCE GROWTH BY CATEGORYANNUAL CHANGE IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS
TOYS, DIY
& HOBBIES
TRAVEL (INCLUDING
ACCOMMODATION)
DIGITAL
MUSIC
VIDEO
GAMES
SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018.
NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND.
+25% +18% +19% +18%
+27% +23% +3% +17%
68
TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE
PURCHASING CONSUMER
GOODS VIA E-COMMERCE
PENETRATION OF CONSUMER
GOODS E-COMMERCE
(TOTAL POPULATION)
AVERAGE ANNUAL REVENUE
PER USER OF CONSUMER
GOODS E-COMMERCE (ARPU)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE:
JAN
2018
E-COMMERCE DETAIL: CONSUMER GOODSAN OVERVIEW OF THE E-COMMERCE MARKET FOR CONSUMER GOODS, WITH VALUES IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE:
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT SALES OF PHYSICAL GOODS VIA DIGITAL CHANNELS
ON ANY DEVICE TO PRIVATE END USERS, AND DO NOT INCLUDE DIGITAL MEDIA, DIGITAL SERVICES SUCH AS TRAVEL OR SOFTWARE, B2B PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, RESALE OF USED
GOODS, OR SALES BETWEEN PRIVATE PERSONS (P2P COMMERCE). PENETRATION FIGURE REPRESENTS PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE.
VALUE OF THE CONSUMER
GOODS E-COMMERCE MARKET
(TOTAL ANNUAL SALES REVENUE)
28.07 11% $7.056 $251
MILLION BILLION
+13% +22% +8%
69
JAN
2018
ADVERTISING MEDIA: FIRST AWARENESSTHE CHANNEL THAT FIRST INTRODUCED INTERNET USERS* TO A PRODUCT OR SERVICE THAT THEY SUBSEQUENTLY PURCHASED
SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE
NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. FIGURES MAY NOT TOTAL TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING.
44%
15%
15%
10%
8%
6%
0%
0%
0%
TELEVISION
ONLINE
PRESS
IN-STORE
POSTER
OTHER
RADIO
EMAIL
DIRECT MAIL

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Materi 3 (TOT Literasi Digital): Etika dan Aturan di Dunia Siber
Materi 3 (TOT Literasi Digital): Etika dan Aturan di Dunia SiberMateri 3 (TOT Literasi Digital): Etika dan Aturan di Dunia Siber
Materi 3 (TOT Literasi Digital): Etika dan Aturan di Dunia SiberIndriyatno Banyumurti
 
Digital 2018 Indonesia (January 2018)
Digital 2018 Indonesia (January 2018)Digital 2018 Indonesia (January 2018)
Digital 2018 Indonesia (January 2018)DataReportal
 
Digital 2020 Indonesia (January 2020) v01
Digital 2020 Indonesia (January 2020) v01Digital 2020 Indonesia (January 2020) v01
Digital 2020 Indonesia (January 2020) v01DataReportal
 
Analisis Disinformasi dalam Pemilu 2019 dan Potensi 2024
Analisis Disinformasi dalam Pemilu 2019 dan Potensi 2024Analisis Disinformasi dalam Pemilu 2019 dan Potensi 2024
Analisis Disinformasi dalam Pemilu 2019 dan Potensi 2024Ismail Fahmi
 
Realitas Demokrasi - Hoaks dan Ujaran Kebencian
Realitas Demokrasi - Hoaks dan Ujaran KebencianRealitas Demokrasi - Hoaks dan Ujaran Kebencian
Realitas Demokrasi - Hoaks dan Ujaran KebencianIsmail Fahmi
 
Digital 2021 Thailand (January 2021) v01
Digital 2021 Thailand (January 2021) v01Digital 2021 Thailand (January 2021) v01
Digital 2021 Thailand (January 2021) v01DataReportal
 
Digital 2021 Taiwan (January 2021) v01
Digital 2021 Taiwan (January 2021) v01Digital 2021 Taiwan (January 2021) v01
Digital 2021 Taiwan (January 2021) v01DataReportal
 
Influence of Social Media and Mainstream Media in Indonesia
Influence of Social Media and Mainstream Media in IndonesiaInfluence of Social Media and Mainstream Media in Indonesia
Influence of Social Media and Mainstream Media in IndonesiaIsmail Fahmi
 
Digital 2018 Poland (January 2018)
Digital 2018 Poland (January 2018)Digital 2018 Poland (January 2018)
Digital 2018 Poland (January 2018)DataReportal
 
Lemhannas: Optimalisasi Peran Media Sosial Untuk Wawasan Kebangsaan
Lemhannas: Optimalisasi Peran Media Sosial Untuk Wawasan KebangsaanLemhannas: Optimalisasi Peran Media Sosial Untuk Wawasan Kebangsaan
Lemhannas: Optimalisasi Peran Media Sosial Untuk Wawasan KebangsaanIsmail Fahmi
 
Literasi Digital ICT Watch
Literasi Digital ICT WatchLiterasi Digital ICT Watch
Literasi Digital ICT WatchICT Watch
 
Digital 2022: Essential Instagram Stats for Q2 2022 v01
Digital 2022: Essential Instagram Stats for Q2 2022 v01Digital 2022: Essential Instagram Stats for Q2 2022 v01
Digital 2022: Essential Instagram Stats for Q2 2022 v01DataReportal
 
Pertemuan2 Etika Sosial Media
Pertemuan2 Etika Sosial MediaPertemuan2 Etika Sosial Media
Pertemuan2 Etika Sosial MediaNurulLutfiaPraja
 
Seri buku literasi digital media sosial untuk advokasi publik
Seri buku literasi digital   media sosial untuk advokasi publikSeri buku literasi digital   media sosial untuk advokasi publik
Seri buku literasi digital media sosial untuk advokasi publikliterasi digital
 
BIMTEK SDGS DESA TAHUN 2023.pptx
BIMTEK SDGS DESA TAHUN 2023.pptxBIMTEK SDGS DESA TAHUN 2023.pptx
BIMTEK SDGS DESA TAHUN 2023.pptxdatangawen
 
Digital 2022: Essential Facebook Stats for Q1 2022 v01
Digital 2022: Essential Facebook Stats for Q1 2022 v01Digital 2022: Essential Facebook Stats for Q1 2022 v01
Digital 2022: Essential Facebook Stats for Q1 2022 v01DataReportal
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Materi 3 (TOT Literasi Digital): Etika dan Aturan di Dunia Siber
Materi 3 (TOT Literasi Digital): Etika dan Aturan di Dunia SiberMateri 3 (TOT Literasi Digital): Etika dan Aturan di Dunia Siber
Materi 3 (TOT Literasi Digital): Etika dan Aturan di Dunia Siber
 
Digital 2018 Indonesia (January 2018)
Digital 2018 Indonesia (January 2018)Digital 2018 Indonesia (January 2018)
Digital 2018 Indonesia (January 2018)
 
Digital 2020 Indonesia (January 2020) v01
Digital 2020 Indonesia (January 2020) v01Digital 2020 Indonesia (January 2020) v01
Digital 2020 Indonesia (January 2020) v01
 
Analisis Disinformasi dalam Pemilu 2019 dan Potensi 2024
Analisis Disinformasi dalam Pemilu 2019 dan Potensi 2024Analisis Disinformasi dalam Pemilu 2019 dan Potensi 2024
Analisis Disinformasi dalam Pemilu 2019 dan Potensi 2024
 
Realitas Demokrasi - Hoaks dan Ujaran Kebencian
Realitas Demokrasi - Hoaks dan Ujaran KebencianRealitas Demokrasi - Hoaks dan Ujaran Kebencian
Realitas Demokrasi - Hoaks dan Ujaran Kebencian
 
Hate speech
Hate speechHate speech
Hate speech
 
Digital 2021 Thailand (January 2021) v01
Digital 2021 Thailand (January 2021) v01Digital 2021 Thailand (January 2021) v01
Digital 2021 Thailand (January 2021) v01
 
BUDAYA DIGITAL.ppt
BUDAYA DIGITAL.pptBUDAYA DIGITAL.ppt
BUDAYA DIGITAL.ppt
 
Digital 2021 Taiwan (January 2021) v01
Digital 2021 Taiwan (January 2021) v01Digital 2021 Taiwan (January 2021) v01
Digital 2021 Taiwan (January 2021) v01
 
Influence of Social Media and Mainstream Media in Indonesia
Influence of Social Media and Mainstream Media in IndonesiaInfluence of Social Media and Mainstream Media in Indonesia
Influence of Social Media and Mainstream Media in Indonesia
 
Etika Digital
Etika DigitalEtika Digital
Etika Digital
 
Digital 2018 Poland (January 2018)
Digital 2018 Poland (January 2018)Digital 2018 Poland (January 2018)
Digital 2018 Poland (January 2018)
 
Literasi Digital - Melawan Hoaks
Literasi Digital - Melawan HoaksLiterasi Digital - Melawan Hoaks
Literasi Digital - Melawan Hoaks
 
Lemhannas: Optimalisasi Peran Media Sosial Untuk Wawasan Kebangsaan
Lemhannas: Optimalisasi Peran Media Sosial Untuk Wawasan KebangsaanLemhannas: Optimalisasi Peran Media Sosial Untuk Wawasan Kebangsaan
Lemhannas: Optimalisasi Peran Media Sosial Untuk Wawasan Kebangsaan
 
Literasi Digital ICT Watch
Literasi Digital ICT WatchLiterasi Digital ICT Watch
Literasi Digital ICT Watch
 
Digital 2022: Essential Instagram Stats for Q2 2022 v01
Digital 2022: Essential Instagram Stats for Q2 2022 v01Digital 2022: Essential Instagram Stats for Q2 2022 v01
Digital 2022: Essential Instagram Stats for Q2 2022 v01
 
Pertemuan2 Etika Sosial Media
Pertemuan2 Etika Sosial MediaPertemuan2 Etika Sosial Media
Pertemuan2 Etika Sosial Media
 
Seri buku literasi digital media sosial untuk advokasi publik
Seri buku literasi digital   media sosial untuk advokasi publikSeri buku literasi digital   media sosial untuk advokasi publik
Seri buku literasi digital media sosial untuk advokasi publik
 
BIMTEK SDGS DESA TAHUN 2023.pptx
BIMTEK SDGS DESA TAHUN 2023.pptxBIMTEK SDGS DESA TAHUN 2023.pptx
BIMTEK SDGS DESA TAHUN 2023.pptx
 
Digital 2022: Essential Facebook Stats for Q1 2022 v01
Digital 2022: Essential Facebook Stats for Q1 2022 v01Digital 2022: Essential Facebook Stats for Q1 2022 v01
Digital 2022: Essential Facebook Stats for Q1 2022 v01
 

Similar a Indonesia digital landscape 2018

Digital in United Arab Emirates - 2018
Digital in United Arab Emirates - 2018Digital in United Arab Emirates - 2018
Digital in United Arab Emirates - 2018Every Leader
 
Digital em Portugal 2018
Digital em Portugal 2018Digital em Portugal 2018
Digital em Portugal 2018alphaCoimbra
 
Digital in Saudi Arabia - 2018
Digital in Saudi Arabia - 2018Digital in Saudi Arabia - 2018
Digital in Saudi Arabia - 2018Every Leader
 
Digital in Morocco - 2018
Digital in Morocco - 2018Digital in Morocco - 2018
Digital in Morocco - 2018Every Leader
 
VIetnam Digital Landscape 2018
VIetnam Digital Landscape 2018VIetnam Digital Landscape 2018
VIetnam Digital Landscape 2018Đức Lê
 
Digital in 2018 in the United States
Digital in 2018 in the United StatesDigital in 2018 in the United States
Digital in 2018 in the United StatesWe Are Social
 
Estatísticas do Mercado Digital 2018 - Pesquisa Estados Unidos (EUA)
Estatísticas do Mercado Digital 2018 - Pesquisa Estados Unidos (EUA)Estatísticas do Mercado Digital 2018 - Pesquisa Estados Unidos (EUA)
Estatísticas do Mercado Digital 2018 - Pesquisa Estados Unidos (EUA)Leonardo Diogo Silva
 
Digital in 2018 in Singapore
Digital in 2018 in SingaporeDigital in 2018 in Singapore
Digital in 2018 in SingaporeWe Are Social
 
Digital in 2018 in the United Kingdom
Digital in 2018 in the United KingdomDigital in 2018 in the United Kingdom
Digital in 2018 in the United KingdomWe Are Social
 
Digital in 2018 in China
Digital in 2018 in ChinaDigital in 2018 in China
Digital in 2018 in ChinaWe Are Social
 
Digital in 2018 in Mexico
Digital in 2018 in MexicoDigital in 2018 in Mexico
Digital in 2018 in MexicoWe Are Social
 
Digital in UAE 2018
Digital in UAE 2018Digital in UAE 2018
Digital in UAE 2018HYPE Digital
 
Digital in Egypt - 2018
Digital in Egypt - 2018Digital in Egypt - 2018
Digital in Egypt - 2018Every Leader
 
Digital in 2018 in Australia
Digital in 2018 in AustraliaDigital in 2018 in Australia
Digital in 2018 in AustraliaWe Are Social
 
Báo cáo thị trường Internet Việt nam 2017
Báo cáo thị trường Internet Việt nam 2017Báo cáo thị trường Internet Việt nam 2017
Báo cáo thị trường Internet Việt nam 2017Tú Cao
 
Digital 2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot (April 2018)
Digital 2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot (April 2018)Digital 2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot (April 2018)
Digital 2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot (April 2018)DataReportal
 
Digital in Jordan - 2018
Digital in Jordan - 2018Digital in Jordan - 2018
Digital in Jordan - 2018Every Leader
 

Similar a Indonesia digital landscape 2018 (20)

Digital in United Arab Emirates - 2018
Digital in United Arab Emirates - 2018Digital in United Arab Emirates - 2018
Digital in United Arab Emirates - 2018
 
Digital em Portugal 2018
Digital em Portugal 2018Digital em Portugal 2018
Digital em Portugal 2018
 
Digital in Saudi Arabia - 2018
Digital in Saudi Arabia - 2018Digital in Saudi Arabia - 2018
Digital in Saudi Arabia - 2018
 
Digital in Morocco - 2018
Digital in Morocco - 2018Digital in Morocco - 2018
Digital in Morocco - 2018
 
VIetnam Digital Landscape 2018
VIetnam Digital Landscape 2018VIetnam Digital Landscape 2018
VIetnam Digital Landscape 2018
 
Digital in 2018 saudi arabia
Digital in 2018   saudi arabiaDigital in 2018   saudi arabia
Digital in 2018 saudi arabia
 
Digital in 2018 in the United States
Digital in 2018 in the United StatesDigital in 2018 in the United States
Digital in 2018 in the United States
 
Estatísticas do Mercado Digital 2018 - Pesquisa Estados Unidos (EUA)
Estatísticas do Mercado Digital 2018 - Pesquisa Estados Unidos (EUA)Estatísticas do Mercado Digital 2018 - Pesquisa Estados Unidos (EUA)
Estatísticas do Mercado Digital 2018 - Pesquisa Estados Unidos (EUA)
 
Digital in 2018 in Singapore
Digital in 2018 in SingaporeDigital in 2018 in Singapore
Digital in 2018 in Singapore
 
Digital in 2018 in the United Kingdom
Digital in 2018 in the United KingdomDigital in 2018 in the United Kingdom
Digital in 2018 in the United Kingdom
 
Digital in 2018 in China
Digital in 2018 in ChinaDigital in 2018 in China
Digital in 2018 in China
 
Digital in 2018 in Mexico
Digital in 2018 in MexicoDigital in 2018 in Mexico
Digital in 2018 in Mexico
 
Digital in UAE 2018
Digital in UAE 2018Digital in UAE 2018
Digital in UAE 2018
 
Digital in Egypt - 2018
Digital in Egypt - 2018Digital in Egypt - 2018
Digital in Egypt - 2018
 
Digital in 2018 in Australia
Digital in 2018 in AustraliaDigital in 2018 in Australia
Digital in 2018 in Australia
 
Báo cáo thị trường Internet Việt nam 2017
Báo cáo thị trường Internet Việt nam 2017Báo cáo thị trường Internet Việt nam 2017
Báo cáo thị trường Internet Việt nam 2017
 
2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot
2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot
2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot
 
Digital 2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot (April 2018)
Digital 2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot (April 2018)Digital 2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot (April 2018)
Digital 2018 Q2 Global Digital Statshot (April 2018)
 
Digital Sri Lanka in 2018
Digital Sri Lanka in 2018Digital Sri Lanka in 2018
Digital Sri Lanka in 2018
 
Digital in Jordan - 2018
Digital in Jordan - 2018Digital in Jordan - 2018
Digital in Jordan - 2018
 

Último

Cybersecurity Threats and Cybersecurity Best Practices
Cybersecurity Threats and Cybersecurity Best PracticesCybersecurity Threats and Cybersecurity Best Practices
Cybersecurity Threats and Cybersecurity Best PracticesLumiverse Solutions Pvt Ltd
 
SCM Symposium PPT Format Customer loyalty is predi
SCM Symposium PPT Format Customer loyalty is prediSCM Symposium PPT Format Customer loyalty is predi
SCM Symposium PPT Format Customer loyalty is predieusebiomeyer
 
『澳洲文凭』买詹姆士库克大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲JCU文凭学位证书
『澳洲文凭』买詹姆士库克大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲JCU文凭学位证书『澳洲文凭』买詹姆士库克大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲JCU文凭学位证书
『澳洲文凭』买詹姆士库克大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲JCU文凭学位证书rnrncn29
 
Company Snapshot Theme for Business by Slidesgo.pptx
Company Snapshot Theme for Business by Slidesgo.pptxCompany Snapshot Theme for Business by Slidesgo.pptx
Company Snapshot Theme for Business by Slidesgo.pptxMario
 
『澳洲文凭』买拉筹伯大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲LTU文凭学位证书
『澳洲文凭』买拉筹伯大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲LTU文凭学位证书『澳洲文凭』买拉筹伯大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲LTU文凭学位证书
『澳洲文凭』买拉筹伯大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲LTU文凭学位证书rnrncn29
 
TRENDS Enabling and inhibiting dimensions.pptx
TRENDS Enabling and inhibiting dimensions.pptxTRENDS Enabling and inhibiting dimensions.pptx
TRENDS Enabling and inhibiting dimensions.pptxAndrieCagasanAkio
 
ETHICAL HACKING dddddddddddddddfnandni.pptx
ETHICAL HACKING dddddddddddddddfnandni.pptxETHICAL HACKING dddddddddddddddfnandni.pptx
ETHICAL HACKING dddddddddddddddfnandni.pptxNIMMANAGANTI RAMAKRISHNA
 
IP addressing and IPv6, presented by Paul Wilson at IETF 119
IP addressing and IPv6, presented by Paul Wilson at IETF 119IP addressing and IPv6, presented by Paul Wilson at IETF 119
IP addressing and IPv6, presented by Paul Wilson at IETF 119APNIC
 
Unidad 4 – Redes de ordenadores (en inglés).pptx
Unidad 4 – Redes de ordenadores (en inglés).pptxUnidad 4 – Redes de ordenadores (en inglés).pptx
Unidad 4 – Redes de ordenadores (en inglés).pptxmibuzondetrabajo
 

Último (9)

Cybersecurity Threats and Cybersecurity Best Practices
Cybersecurity Threats and Cybersecurity Best PracticesCybersecurity Threats and Cybersecurity Best Practices
Cybersecurity Threats and Cybersecurity Best Practices
 
SCM Symposium PPT Format Customer loyalty is predi
SCM Symposium PPT Format Customer loyalty is prediSCM Symposium PPT Format Customer loyalty is predi
SCM Symposium PPT Format Customer loyalty is predi
 
『澳洲文凭』买詹姆士库克大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲JCU文凭学位证书
『澳洲文凭』买詹姆士库克大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲JCU文凭学位证书『澳洲文凭』买詹姆士库克大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲JCU文凭学位证书
『澳洲文凭』买詹姆士库克大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲JCU文凭学位证书
 
Company Snapshot Theme for Business by Slidesgo.pptx
Company Snapshot Theme for Business by Slidesgo.pptxCompany Snapshot Theme for Business by Slidesgo.pptx
Company Snapshot Theme for Business by Slidesgo.pptx
 
『澳洲文凭』买拉筹伯大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲LTU文凭学位证书
『澳洲文凭』买拉筹伯大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲LTU文凭学位证书『澳洲文凭』买拉筹伯大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲LTU文凭学位证书
『澳洲文凭』买拉筹伯大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲LTU文凭学位证书
 
TRENDS Enabling and inhibiting dimensions.pptx
TRENDS Enabling and inhibiting dimensions.pptxTRENDS Enabling and inhibiting dimensions.pptx
TRENDS Enabling and inhibiting dimensions.pptx
 
ETHICAL HACKING dddddddddddddddfnandni.pptx
ETHICAL HACKING dddddddddddddddfnandni.pptxETHICAL HACKING dddddddddddddddfnandni.pptx
ETHICAL HACKING dddddddddddddddfnandni.pptx
 
IP addressing and IPv6, presented by Paul Wilson at IETF 119
IP addressing and IPv6, presented by Paul Wilson at IETF 119IP addressing and IPv6, presented by Paul Wilson at IETF 119
IP addressing and IPv6, presented by Paul Wilson at IETF 119
 
Unidad 4 – Redes de ordenadores (en inglés).pptx
Unidad 4 – Redes de ordenadores (en inglés).pptxUnidad 4 – Redes de ordenadores (en inglés).pptx
Unidad 4 – Redes de ordenadores (en inglés).pptx
 

Indonesia digital landscape 2018

  • 1. 34 TOTAL POPULATION INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS URBANISATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: PENETRATION: JAN 2018 A SNAPSHOT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY DIGITAL STATISTICAL INDICATORS SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION (ALL AGES). DIGITAL IN INDONESIA 265.4 132.7 130.0 177.9 120.0 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION 56% 50% 49% 67% 45%
  • 2. 35 INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UNIQUE MOBILE USERS ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS JAN 2018 YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN KEY STATISTICAL INDICATORS ANNUAL DIGITAL GROWTH SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SINCE JAN 2017 SOURCES: POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA AND MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS; MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; GOOGLE; ERICSSON; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. GROWTH DATA: WE ARE SOCIAL & HOOTSUITE’S DIGITAL IN 2017 REPORT. 0% +23% +1% +30% (UNCHANGED) +24 MILLION +2 MILLION +28 MILLION
  • 3. 36 TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE POPULATION MALE POPULATION MEDIAN AGE JAN 2018 POPULATION & ECONOMIC INDICATORSESSENTIAL DEMOGRAPHICS AND KEY ECONOMIC INDICATORS ANNUAL CHANGE IN POPULATION SIZE POPULATION LIVING IN URBAN AREAS GDP PER CAPITA LITERACY (TOTAL) MALE LITERACY FEMALE LITERACY SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; US CENSUS BUREAU; UNESCO; WORLD BANK, IMF; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK. 265.4 49.7% 50.3% +1.1% 30.5 MILLION YEARS OLD 56% $11,632 94% 92% 96%
  • 4. 37 MOBILE PHONE (ANY TYPE) SMART PHONE LAPTOP OR DESKTOP COMPUTER TABLET COMPUTER JAN 2018 DEVICE USAGEPERCENTAGE OF THE ADULT POPULATION* THAT CURRENTLY USES EACH KIND OF DEVICE [SURVEY-BASED] TELEVISION (ANY KIND) DEVICE FOR STREAMING INTERNET CONTENT TO TV E-READER DEVICE WEARABLE TECH DEVICE SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 91% 60% 22% 8% 95% 2% 1% 1%
  • 5. 38 AVERAGE DAILY TIME SPENT USING THE INTERNET VIA ANY DEVICE AVERAGE DAILY TIME SPENT USING SOCIAL MEDIA VIA ANY DEVICE AVERAGE DAILY TV VIEWING TIME (BROADCAST, STREAMING AND VIDEO ON DEMAND) AVERAGE DAILY TIME SPENT LISTENING TO STREAMING MUSIC JAN 2018 TIME SPENT WITH MEDIASURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT RESPONDENTS’ SELF-REPORTED ACTIVITY SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. NOTE: TIME SPENT USING SOCIAL MEDIA INCLUDES SOCIAL NETWORKS AS WELL AS MESSENGERS / CHAT APPS. 8H 51M 3H 23M 2H 45M 1H 19M
  • 6. 39 BELIEVE THAT NEW TECHNOLOGIES OFFER MORE OPPORTUNITIES THAN RISKS PREFER TO COMPLETE TASKS DIGITALLY WHENEVER POSSIBLE BELIEVE DATA PRIVACY AND PROTECTION ARE VERY IMPORTANT DELETE COOKIES FROM INTERNET BROWSER TO PROTECT PRIVACY JAN 2018 ATTITUDES TOWARDS DIGITALHOW INTERNET USERS* PERCEIVE THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY, AND THEIR PERSPECTIVE ON PRIVACY ISSUES USE AN AD-BLOCKING TOOL TO STOP ADVERTS BEING DISPLAYED SOURCES: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018; GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3, 2017. NOTES: GOOGLE FIGURES BASED ON A SURVEY OF ADULT INTERNET USERS. SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON METHODOLOGY AND AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. GLOBALWEBINDEX FIGURES BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. *NOTE: THESE FIGURES ONLY REPRESENT THE ATTITUDES AND ACTIVITIES OF INTERNET USERS. 71% 68% 79% 57% 50%
  • 7. 40 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE INTERNET USERS INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE MOBILE INTERNET USERS MOBILE INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 INTERNET USEBASED ON REPORTED INTERNET USER DATA, AND USER-CLAIMED MOBILE INTERNET USE SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; EUROSTAT; INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; FACEBOOK; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; REPUTABLE MEDIA; GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. NOTES: GLOBALWEBINDEX DATA IS BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64, BUT DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. PENETRATION FIGURES BASED ON POPULATION DATA FROM THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. 132.7 50% 124.8 47% MILLION MILLION
  • 8. 41 INTERNET WORLD STATS ITU (INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION) INTERNET LIVE STATS JAN 2018 INTERNET USERS: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVESREPORTS OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS FROM DIFFERENT DATA PROVIDERS CIA WORLD FACTBOOK SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION (ITU); INTERNETLIVESTATS; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; ALL LATEST REPORTED FIGURES AS OF JANUARY 2018. 132.7 67.3 53.2 67.4 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
  • 9. 42 EVERY DAY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AT LEAST ONCE PER MONTH LESS THAN ONCE PER MONTH JAN 2018 FREQUENCY OF INTERNET USEHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS ACCESS THE INTERNET FOR PERSONAL REASONS (ANY DEVICE) 1 7 31 ? SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS, OR DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA. 79% 14% 6% 1%
  • 10. 43 AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED VIA FIXED CONNECTIONS AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED VIA MOBILE CONNECTIONS ACCESS THE INTERNET MOST OFTEN VIA A COMPUTER OR TABLET ACCESS EQUALLY VIA A SMARTPHONE AND COMPUTER OR TABLET JAN 2018 INTERNET CONNECTIONS: SPEED & DEVICESAVERAGE INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS, AND THE DEVICE THAT PEOPLE USE MOST OFTEN TO ACCESS THE INTERNET ACCESS THE INTERNET MOST OFTEN VIA A SMARTPHONE SOURCES: OOKLA SPEEDTEST, NOVEMBER 2017; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. GOOGLE’S FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTES: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT RESPONDENTS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DEVICE USAGE PERCENTAGES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO “DON’T KNOW” OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS. 13.79 9.82 3% 6% 81% MBPS MBPS
  • 11. 44 LAPTOPS & DESKTOPS MOBILE PHONES TABLET DEVICES OTHER DEVICES YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: JAN 2018 SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY DEVICEBASED ON EACH DEVICE’S SHARE OF ALL WEB PAGES SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: SOURCES: STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2018, AND STATCOUNTER, JANUARY 2017. 26% 72% 2% [N/A] -8% +5% -34% [N/A]
  • 12. 45 JAN 2018 SIMILARWEB’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY TRAFFIC TO EACH WEBSITE IN Q4 2017 SOURCE: SIMILARWEB, JANUARY 2018, BASED ON AVERAGE MONTHLY DATA FOR Q4 2017. NOTES: MONTHLY TRAFFIC REPRESENTS TOTAL VISITS TO EACH SITE, NOT UNIQUE VISITORS. DATA FOR SOME COUNTRIES REPRESENTS DESKTOP TRAFFIC, WHILST OTHERS REPRESENTS TRAFFIC FROM BOTH DESKTOP AND MOBILE DEVICES. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. # WEBSITE CATEGORY MONTHLY TRAFFIC TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 GOOGLE.CO.ID SEARCH 2,915,900,000 9M 02S 7.5 GOOGLE.COM SEARCH 1,180,700,000 5M 32S 4.9 FACEBOOK.COM SOCIAL 1,174,100,000 12M 27S 14.2 BLOGSPOT.CO.ID BLOGS 692,300,000 4M 32S 2.2 GOOGLEWEBLIGHT.COM SEARCH 577,600,000 7M 49S 4.8 YOUTUBE.COM TV & VIDEO 558,900,000 23M 02S 11.3 LINE.ME SOCIAL 220,300,000 1M 52S 2.1 DETIK.COM NEWS & MEDIA 201,200,000 6M 45S 4.4 WORDPRESS.COM BLOGS 166,300,000 2M 51S 1.8 YAHOO.COM NEWS & MEDIA 142,900,000 5M 46S 5.0
  • 13. 46 JAN 2018 ALEXA’S RANKING OF TOP WEBSITESRANKINGS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF VISITORS TO EACH SITE, AND THE NUMBER OF PAGES VIEWED ON EACH SITE PER VISIT # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # WEBSITE TIME PAGES 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: ALEXA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: ‘TIME’ REPRESENTS TIME SPENT ON SITE PER DAY. ‘PAGES’ REPRESENTS NUMBER OF PAGE VIEWS PER DAY. ALEXA USES A COMBINATION OF AVERAGE DAILY VISITORS AND PAGE VIEWS OVER A ONE-MONTH PERIOD TO CALCULATE ITS RANKING. RANKINGS ON THIS SLIDE ARE BASED ON THE MONTH TO 16 JANUARY 2018. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES REFERENCED ON THIS SLIDE MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT, OR CONTENT THAT IS UNSUITABLE FOR THE WORKPLACE. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES. GOOGLE.CO.ID 6M 28S 8.44 GOOGLE.COM 7M 32S 8.56 YOUTUBE.COM 8M 18S 4.79 DETIK.COM 10M 27S 6.79 TRIBUNNEWS.COM 6M 05S 3.57 TOKOPEDIA.COM 13M 08S 7.41 FACEBOOK.COM 10M 21S 4.00 BUKALAPAK.COM 8M 34S 5.13 YAHOO.COM 4M 02S 3.61 LIPUTAN6.COM 4M 57S 2.19 KOMPAS.COM 7M 05S 3.27 KASKUS.CO.ID 7M 02S 3.77 KAPANLAGI.COM 5M 32S 4.14 BRILIO.NET 4M 05S 1.90 LAZADA.CO.ID 4M 24S 3.26 MERDEKA.COM 5M 38S 2.51 SINDONEWS.COM 4M 04S 2.59 UZONE.ID 1M 40S 2.49 IDNTIMES.COM 2M 52S 1.76 KUMPARAN.COM 2M 42S 1.38
  • 14. 47 USE A SEARCH ENGINE VISIT A SOCIAL NETWORK PLAY GAMES WATCH VIDEOS JAN 2018 WEEKLY ONLINE ACTIVITIES BY DEVICEPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION* ENGAGING IN EACH ACTIVITY AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK [SURVEY-BASED] LOOK FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SMARTPHONE: COMPUTER: SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 19% 37% 7% 18% 8% 4% 6% 2% 3% 1%
  • 15. 48 JAN 2018 TOP GOOGLE SEARCH QUERIES IN 2017RANKING OF THE TOP SEARCH TERMS ENTERED INTO GOOGLE’S SEARCH ENGINE THROUGHOUT 2017 # QUERY INDEX 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 # QUERY INDEX 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE ‘INDEX’ COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE VOLUME FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED TO THE SEARCH VOLUME FOR THE TOP QUERY (AN INDEX OF 50 MEANS THAT THE QUERY RECEIVED 50% OF THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY). DOWNLOAD 100 LAGU 96 FB 59 VIDEO 52 DOWNLOAD LAGU 40 FACEBOOK 39 GOOGLE 35 GAMBAR 33 MP3 31 TRANSLATE 29 YOUTUBE 29 FILM 27 YT 23 TOGEL 15 GOOGLE TRANSLATE 14 YOU 13 CUACA 10 GAME 10 BERITA 10 GMAIL 10
  • 16. 49 WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY DAY WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY WEEK WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS EVERY MONTH WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS LESS THAN ONCE A MONTH JAN 2018 FREQUENCY OF WATCHING ONLINE VIDEOHOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS (ANY DEVICE) NEVER WATCH ONLINE VIDEOS 1 7 31 365 X SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 21% 24% 21% 13% 20%
  • 17. 50 REGULAR TELEVISION ON A TV SET RECORDED CONTENT ON A TV SET CATCH-UP / ON-DEMAND SERVICE ON TV SET ONLINE CONTENT STREAMED ON A TV SET JAN 2018 HOW INTERNET USERS WATCH TELEVISIONCOMPARISON OF THE METHODS AND DEVICES USED FOR ACCESSING AND DISPLAYING ‘TELEVISION’ CONTENT ONLINE CONTENT STREAMED ON ANOTHER DEVICE SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. 98% 6% 5% 7% 7%
  • 18. 51 TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL NUMBER OF SOCIAL USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 SOCIAL MEDIA USEBASED ON THE MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS REPORTED BY THE MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM IN EACH COUNTRY SOURCES: FACEBOOK; TENCENT; VKONTAKTE; KAKAO; NAVER; DING; TECHRASA; SIMILARWEB; KEPIOS ANALYSIS NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 130.0 49% 120.0 45% MILLION MILLION
  • 19. 52 JAN 2018 MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMSSURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT USERS’ OWN CLAIMED / REPORTED ACTIVITY SOCIAL NETWORK MESSENGER / CHAT APP / VOIP SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. NOTES: DATA FOR PLATFORMS WITH AN ASTERISK (*) IS COLLECTED IN A DIFFERENT PART OF THE SURVEY TO OTHER PLATFORM DATA. ALL DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. ADVISORY: FIGURES ARE BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY, AND MAY NOT CORRELATE TO SOCIAL MEDIA PENETRATION FIGURES SHOWN ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT; FOR FULL DETAILS, SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT. 43% 41% 40% 38% 33% 28% 27% 25% 24% 16% 15% 14% YOUTUBE FACEBOOK WHATSAPP INSTAGRAM LINE BBM TWITTER GOOGLE+ FB MESSENGER LINKEDIN SKYPE WECHAT
  • 20. 53 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS ANNUAL CHANGE IN FACEBOOK USERS vs. JANUARY 2017 PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE JAN 2018 FACEBOOK USAGE ANALYSISA CLOSER LOOK AT FACEBOOK USE, BROKEN DOWN BY MOBILE USE AND SELF-DECLARED GENDER OF USERS SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS FEMALE PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK PROFILES DECLARED AS MALE 130.0 +23% 92% 44% 56% MILLION
  • 21. 54 AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL 13 – 17 18 – 24 25 – 34 35 – 44 45 – 54 55 – 64 65+ FEMALE MALE PROFILE OF FACEBOOK USERSA BREAKDOWN OF THE COUNTRY’S FACEBOOK’S USERS BY AGE AND GENDER, IN MILLIONS JAN 2018 SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF FACEBOOK DATA, JANUARY 2018. NOTES: THE ‘TOTAL’ COLUMN OF THE INSET TABLE SHOWS ORIGINAL VALUES, WHILE GRAPH VALUES HAVE BEEN DIVIDED BY ONE MILLION. TABLE PERCENTAGES REPRESENT THE RESPECTIVE GENDER AND AGE GROUP’S SHARE OF TOTAL NATIONAL FACEBOOK USERS. TABLE VALUES MAY NOT SUM EXACTLY DUE TO ROUNDING IN THE SOURCE DATA. 13 – 17 YEARS OLD 65+ YEARS OLD 25 – 34 YEARS OLD 35 – 44 YEARS OLD 45 – 54 YEARS OLD 55 – 64 YEARS OLD 18 – 24 YEARS OLD AGE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL 130,000,000 44% 56% 13 – 17 23,000,000 9% 9% 18 – 24 45,000,000 16% 19% 25 – 34 39,000,000 12% 18% 35 – 44 15,000,000 5% 7% 45 – 54 5,400,000 2% 2% 55 – 64 1,300,000 0.4% 0.6% 65+ 2,400,000 0.6% 1% 11.7 20.4 15.5 6.0 2.2 0.5 0.7 11.1 24.2 23.2 8.8 3.1 0.8 1.6
  • 22. 55 JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK PAGE POST REACH AVERAGE MONTHLY CHANGE IN PAGE LIKES AVERAGE POST REACH vs. PAGE LIKES AVERAGE ORGANIC REACH vs. PAGE LIKES PERCENTAGE OF PAGES USING PAID MEDIA AVERAGE MONTHLY GROWTH IN PAGE LIKES (‘FANS’), AVERAGE REACH OF PAGE POSTS vs. PAGE LIKES, AND PAID MEDIA AVERAGE PAID REACH vs. TOTAL REACH SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: REACH FIGURES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF TIMES THAT A POST WAS SERVED IN USERS’ NEWSFEEDS TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGE ‘FANS’ (I.E. USERS THAT HAD LIKED THE PAGE) AT THE TIME THAT THE POST WAS PUBLISHED. +1.93% 7.8% 3.2% 33.2% 19.4%
  • 23. 56 AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE POSTS (ALL TYPES) AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE VIDEO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE PHOTO POSTS AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE LINK POSTS JAN 2018 AVERAGE FACEBOOK ENGAGEMENT RATESTHE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ENGAGE WITH A FACEBOOK PAGE’S POSTS vs. THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT THOSE POSTS REACH AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT RATE FOR FACEBOOK PAGE STATUS POSTS SOURCE: LOCOWISE, JANUARY 2018. DATA REPRESENTS AVERAGE FIGURES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: ENGAGEMENT RATES COMPARE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO INTERACTED WITH A POST TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNIQUE USERS TO WHOM THAT POST WAS SERVED, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THOSE USERS WERE FANS OF THE PAGE AT THAT TIME. 4.16% 9.70% 8.55% 5.17% 4.65%
  • 24. 57 TOTAL NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS MALE USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS JAN 2018 INSTAGRAM USAGE ANALYSISAN OVERVIEW OF MONTHLY ACTIVE INSTAGRAM USERS, BROKEN DOWN BY GENDER SOURCE: EXTRAPOLATION OF DATA FROM INSTAGRAM (VIA FACEBOOK), JANUARY 2018. PENETRATION RATES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 53.00 20% 49% 51% MILLION
  • 25. 58 NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS (ANY TYPE OF HANDSET) MOBILE PENETRATION (UNIQUE USERS vs. TOTAL POPULATION) TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION JAN 2018 MOBILE USERS vs. MOBILE CONNECTIONSCOMPARING THE NUMBER OF UNIQUE MOBILE USERS TO THE NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS AVERAGE NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS PER UNIQUE MOBILE USER SOURCES: UNIQUE MOBILE USERS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, JANUARY 2018; GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018; MOBILE CONNECTIONS: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 177.9 67% 415.7 157% 2.34 MILLION MILLION
  • 26. 59 TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS MOBILE CONNECTIONS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE PRE-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE POST-PAID PERCENTAGE OF MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE BROADBAND (3G & 4G) JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIONS BY TYPEBASED ON THE NUMBER OF CELLULAR CONNECTIONS (NOTE: NOT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS) SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. NOTE: PENETRATION FIGURES ARE FOR TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 415.7 157% 98% 2% 54% MILLION
  • 27. 60 OVERALL COUNTRY INDEX SCORE MOBILE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE AFFORDABILITY OF DEVICES & SERVICES CONSUMER READINESS JAN 2018 MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEXGSMA INTELLIGENCE’S ASSESSMENT OF THE COUNTRY’S KEY ENABLERS AND DRIVERS OF MOBILE CONNECTIVITY AVAILABILITY OF RELEVANT CONTENT & SERVICES OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 OUT OF A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE, Q4 2017. TO ACCESS THE COMPLETE MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEX, VISIT HTTP://WWW.MOBILECONNECTIVITYINDEX.COM/ 52.71 41.39 58.24 69.06 46.37
  • 28. 61 PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION USING MOBILE MESSENGERS PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION WATCHING VIDEOS ON MOBILE PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION PLAYING GAMES ON MOBILE PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION USING MOBILE BANKING JAN 2018 MOBILE ACTIVITIESSURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT RESPONDENTS’ SELF-REPORTED ACTIVITY PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION USING MOBILE MAP SERVICES SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. NOTE: DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 47% 43% 37% 27% 42%
  • 29. 62 USE THE ALARM CLOCK FUNCTION MANAGE DIARY OR APPOINTMENTS CHECK THE WEATHER TRACK HEALTH, DIET, OR ACTIVITY LEVELS JAN 2018 SMARTPHONE LIFE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIESPERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION USING A SMARTPHONE TO PERFORM EACH TASK [SURVEY-BASED] TAKE PHOTOS OR VIDEOS CHECK THE NEWS READ E-BOOKS OR E-MAGAZINES MANAGE LISTS (E.G. SHOPPING, TASKS) SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTES: DATA BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 17% 6% 4% 4% 44% 18% 3% 4%
  • 30. 63 JAN 2018 TOP APP RANKINGSRANKINGS OF TOP MOBILE APPS BY MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS AND BY NUMBER OF DOWNLOADS RANKING OF MOBILE APPS BY MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS # APP NAME DEVELOPER / COMPANY 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 RANKING OF MOBILE APPS BY NUMBER OF DOWNLOADS # APP NAME DEVELOPER / COMPANY 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 SOURCE: APP ANNIE, JANUARY 2018, BASED ON DATA IN THE APP ANNIE 2017 RETROSPECTIVE REPORT. FOR MORE DETAILS, VISIT HTTPS://WWW.APPANNIE.COM/ NOTES: RANKINGS ARE BASED ON COMBINED DATA FOR BOTH THE APPLE iOS APP STORE AND THE GOOGLE PLAY APP STORE. MONTHLY ACTIVE USER RANKINGS ARE BASED ON MONTHLY AVERAGES FOR FULL-YEAR 2017. NOTE: RANKINGS EXCLUDE PRE-INSTALLED APPS, SUCH AS YOUTUBE ON ANDROID DEVICES, AND SAFARI ON APPLE DEVICES. WHATSAPP MESSENGER FACEBOOK FACEBOOK FACEBOOK INSTAGRAM FACEBOOK LINE LINE BBM BLACKBERRY FACEBOOK MESSENGER FACEBOOK SHAREIT SHAREIT UC BROWSER ALIBABA GROUP GO-JEK GO-JEK GRAB GRAB FACEBOOK FACEBOOK WHATSAPP MESSENGER FACEBOOK FACEBOOK MESSENGER FACEBOOK UC BROWSER ALIBABA GROUP SHAREIT SHAREIT INSTAGRAM FACEBOOK BBM BLACKBERRY LINE LINE GRAB GRAB UC NEWS ALIBABA GROUP
  • 31. 64 HAS A BANK ACCOUNT HAS A CREDIT CARD MAKES AND / OR RECEIVES MOBILE PAYMENTS VIA GSMA MAKES ONLINE PURCHASES AND / OR PAYS BILLS ONLINE JAN 2018 FINANCIAL INCLUSION FACTORSPERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AGED 15+ THAT REPORTS OWNING OR USING EACH FINANCIAL PRODUCT OR SERVICE PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF MEN WITH A CREDIT CARD PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS PERCENTAGE OF MEN MAKING INTERNET PAYMENTS SOURCE: WORLD BANK GLOBAL FINANCIAL INCLUSION DATA (2015). NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT THE PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE AGED 15+, NOT TOTAL POPULATION. 36% 2% 0.4% 5% 2% 1% 5% 6%
  • 32. 65 SEARCHED ONLINE FOR A PRODUCT OR SERVICE TO BUY VISITED AN ONLINE RETAIL STORE PURCHASED A PRODUCT OR SERVICE ONLINE MADE AN ONLINE PURCHASE VIA A LAPTOP OR DESKTOP COMPUTER JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE ACTIVITIES IN PAST 30 DAYSSURVEY-BASED DATA: FIGURES REPRESENT RESPONDENTS’ SELF-REPORTED ACTIVITY MADE AN ONLINE PURCHASE VIA A MOBILE DEVICE SOURCE: GLOBALWEBINDEX, Q2 & Q3 2017. BASED ON A SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. NOTE: DATA HAS BEEN REBASED TO SHOW TOTAL NATIONAL PENETRATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. 45% 45% 40% 31% 31%
  • 33. 66 FASHION & BEAUTY ELECTRONICS & PHYSICAL MEDIA FOOD & PERSONAL CARE FURNITURE & APPLIANCES JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE SPEND BY CATEGORYTOTAL ANNUAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS TOYS, DIY & HOBBIES TRAVEL (INCLUDING ACCOMMODATION) DIGITAL MUSIC VIDEO GAMES SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND. $2.466 $1.273 $0.593 $1.288 BILLION BILLION BILLION BILLION $1.436 $2.417 $0.004 $0.792 BILLION BILLION BILLION BILLION
  • 34. 67 FASHION & BEAUTY ELECTRONICS & PHYSICAL MEDIA FOOD & PERSONAL CARE FURNITURE & APPLIANCES JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE GROWTH BY CATEGORYANNUAL CHANGE IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT SPENT ON CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS TOYS, DIY & HOBBIES TRAVEL (INCLUDING ACCOMMODATION) DIGITAL MUSIC VIDEO GAMES SOURCES: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, E-TRAVEL INDUSTRY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA INDUSTRY, ALL ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTE: FIGURES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR CONSUMER SPEND IN 2017, AND DO NOT INCLUDE B2B SPEND. +25% +18% +19% +18% +27% +23% +3% +17%
  • 35. 68 TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE PURCHASING CONSUMER GOODS VIA E-COMMERCE PENETRATION OF CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE (TOTAL POPULATION) AVERAGE ANNUAL REVENUE PER USER OF CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE (ARPU) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: JAN 2018 E-COMMERCE DETAIL: CONSUMER GOODSAN OVERVIEW OF THE E-COMMERCE MARKET FOR CONSUMER GOODS, WITH VALUES IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE: SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK, E-COMMERCE INDUSTRY, ACCESSED JANUARY 2018. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT SALES OF PHYSICAL GOODS VIA DIGITAL CHANNELS ON ANY DEVICE TO PRIVATE END USERS, AND DO NOT INCLUDE DIGITAL MEDIA, DIGITAL SERVICES SUCH AS TRAVEL OR SOFTWARE, B2B PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, RESALE OF USED GOODS, OR SALES BETWEEN PRIVATE PERSONS (P2P COMMERCE). PENETRATION FIGURE REPRESENTS PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. VALUE OF THE CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE MARKET (TOTAL ANNUAL SALES REVENUE) 28.07 11% $7.056 $251 MILLION BILLION +13% +22% +8%
  • 36. 69 JAN 2018 ADVERTISING MEDIA: FIRST AWARENESSTHE CHANNEL THAT FIRST INTRODUCED INTERNET USERS* TO A PRODUCT OR SERVICE THAT THEY SUBSEQUENTLY PURCHASED SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER, JANUARY 2018. FIGURES BASED ON RESPONSES TO A SURVEY. *NOTE: DATA REPRESENTS ADULT INTERNET USERS ONLY; PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION ON GOOGLE’S METHODOLOGY AND THEIR AUDIENCE DEFINITIONS. FIGURES MAY NOT TOTAL TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. 44% 15% 15% 10% 8% 6% 0% 0% 0% TELEVISION ONLINE PRESS IN-STORE POSTER OTHER RADIO EMAIL DIRECT MAIL