6. S A F E C A S T I S …
•International, ad-hoc volunteer network
•Non-heirarchical (but with “centers of
gravity”)
•Includes radiation experts, hardware
designers, software designers, academics,
tinkerers, hackers, entrepreneurs,
housewives, drivers, students, etc.
•“Brain Trust” : Leaders in their fields
•We are Pro-Data !
7. S O M E S A I L O R W /
G E I G E R C O U N T E R
1 9 4 0 ’ S
29. 30 km
Iidate village
Sohma shi
Date shi
Fukushima Dai ichi NNP
Ohkuma city
Futaba city
Tamura shi
Katsurao village
Namie city
Nihommatsu shi
Kawauchi village
Tomioka city
Naraha city
Hirono city
Iwaki shi
20 km
Minamisohma shiKawamata city
Fukushima shi
Ootama
village
Motomiya shi
Miharu city
Ono city
Hirata
village
Tamakawa
village
Ishikawa city
Furudono village
Samegawa village
Asakawa city
sheltering level
S P E E D I
40. • 7th-generation mobile detector
• Rugged
• Arduino-based
• GPS and data-logging
• LND 7317 2” pancake sensor
• OLED display
• Bluetooth and WiFi capable
• Open-source, open hardware, open data
• Designed as a kit, anyone can build it and upload data
50. D A T A G U I D E L I N E S
• Every data point must have a time stamp and GPS coordinates.
• Device and user must have unique IDs to provide ability to
identify and track errors (user can remain anonymous but still
needs ID)
• The device used must have publicly available specs, including
sensor type, size, and manufacturer.
• Data submitted to Safecast must be formatted correctly with all
applicable metadata.
• Measurements should be taken at approx 1m height, with
safeguards against interference, etc.
• Measurements should be given in CPM, and note what kind of
shielding (if any) was used.
• A single measurement cannot represent the levels of an entire city
66. – I E M 6 R E P O R T
“…crowdsourcing, for example in the
collection and dissemination of radiation
data, can also help to instill confidence
in information from official sources. But to
continue to be effective, these public
groups need to maintain their
independence; to be seen to work too
closely with the authorities will diminish
their effectiveness, and consequently also
their credibility, making them redundant….
67. – I E M 6 R E P O R T ( C O N T )
“…For government authorities and
agencies, crowdsourcing certainly is the
‘genie that will not go back in the bottle’. It
is necessary to accept that this technology
is here to stay and that empowerment of
the public is not necessarily a
negative development.”
68. O F F I C I A L D A T A I S
O P A Q U E & C O N F U S I N G
69. M E X T - D O E
A I R B O R N E
M A P - 0 5 / 2 0 1 1
81. K U R A M A
• Kyoto University
• Govt Funded
• $10,000 per device
• Closed data
• No public involvement
82. B I S H A M O N
• Niigata University + UCLA
• High Quality Data
• Expensive, proprietary
hardware
• Dormant since 2014
• Upcoming features
(safecast circa 2011)
83. S A F E C A S T
I N S P I R E D
• DARPA Project
• ASIJ
• Kithub
• Aoyama Gakuin University