course material

1. Discussion: Post Intensive Care Syndrome
Discussion: Post Intensive Care SyndromeORDER HERE FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE
PAPERS ON Discussion: Post Intensive Care SyndromeAssignment: Academic Success and
Professional Development Plan Part 4: Research AnalysisArchitect Daniel Libeskind is
credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to
articulate it.” The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of others but relies
on it. Discussion: Post Intensive Care SyndromeUnderstanding the work of others is
critically important to new work. Contributions to the nursing body of knowledge can
happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of previous research. Hence
research analysis skills are critical tools for your toolbox.In this Assignment, you will locate
relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research using a tool helpful for
analysis.To Prepare:Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this week in
support of locating and analyzing research.Use the Walden Library to identify and read one
peer-reviewed research article focused on a topic of interest to you in your specialty
field.Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of
theories/concepts as described by the articleThe Assignment: MAKE SURE TO CLEARLY
MENTION EACH OF THE BELOW IN THE WRITING, AND FILL THE MATRIX SECTION OF
THE TEMPLATE.Using the ‘Week 4 | Part 4’ section of your Academic Success and
Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of
the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:Clearly
identify the topic of interest you have selected.Provide an accurate and complete APA
formatted citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.Clearly
identify and describe in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts
presented in the article.Provide a clear and accurate analysis of the article using
the Research Analysis Matrixsection of the template.Write a 1-paragraph justification that
clearly and accurately explains in detail whether you would recommend the use of this
article to inform professional practice. Note: You can use the CARP method as presented in
the Resources for this week on evaluating resources.Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary
that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that
includes the following:Clearly and accurately describe in detail your approach to identifying
and analyzing peer-reviewed research.Clearly identify and accurately describe in detail at
least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-
reviewed research.Provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of at least one
resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research. Discussion: Post

2. Intensive Care SyndromeIntegrate at least one outside resource and 2-3 course specific
resources to fully support your summary. Make sure to have at least 3 (1 out side from the
article, and 2-3 from Walden) References. (see bellow for Walden resources). Use the
Walden University Library Databases A-Z to get the external peer-reviewed article.Walden
University Library. (n.d.). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981Use 1 reference from database type,”
nursing”Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the
Week 1 Assignment, which was built off the Academic Success and Professional
Development Plan Template.Learning Resources Walden Week 4Required Readings(use at
least 2-3 from these resources)Shellenbarger, T. (2016). Simplifying synthesis. Nurse
Author & Editor, 26(3). Retrieved from http://naepub.com/reporting-research/2016-26-3-
3/Walden University Library. (n.d.). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved October 4, 2019
from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981Walden University Library.
(n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journalsWalden
University Library. (n.d.). Instructional media: Fundamentals of library research. Retrieved
October 4, 2019 from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/instructionalmedia/researchfundamentalsW
alden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Retrieved October 12, 2018, from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/homeWalden University Writing
Center. (n.d.). Scholarly writing: Overview. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarlyWalden University. (n.d.).
Subject Research: Nursing. Retrieved November 9, 2018, from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/subject/nursingWalden University Writing
Center. (n.d.). Webinars: Technical information. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/technicalDocument:
Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template (Word
document)Document: Introduction to scholarly writing: Tips for success (PDF) Required
MediaLaureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly
Writing: Purpose, Audience, and Evidence [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Accessible
player –Downloads– Download Video w/CC Download Audio Download
TranscriptLaureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly
Writing: Tips for Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Accessible player –
Downloads– Download Video w/CC Download Audio Download Transcript Below I show
you an incomplete! example of what to do for section week 4 (this is form another
student).Week 4 | Part 4: Research Analysis I have identified one topic of interest for further
study. I have researched and identified one peer-reviewed research article focused on this
topic and have analyzed this article. The results of these efforts are shared
below. Directions: Complete Step 1 by using the table and subsequent space below identify
and analyze the research article you have selected. Complete Step 2 by summarizing in 2-3
paragraphs the results of your analysis using the space identified. Remember to include an
introduction paragraph which contains a clear and comprehensive purpose statement
which delineates all required criteria, and end the assignment Part with a conclusion

3. paragraph. One major topic, I am interested in further studying is “ Epidemiology of
Suicide Attempts among Youth Transitioning to Adulthood.” Suicide is now the 10th leading
cause of death in the United States of America (Joint Commission, 2017). Mental health
professionals such as psychiatric nurse practitioners and other mental health professionals
have evidence-based practice and different types of literature as a resource to sharpen
assessment skills and techniques to provide appropriate care and more exceptional
outcomes for suicidal patients. I want to study and understand what is the cause and
epidemiology of suicide attempts from youth to adulthood because I continue to admit
patients in my unit with anoxic brain injuries, traumatic brain injuries, and multiple spiral
cord fractures as a result from a suicide attempt. The probability of suicide attempt is link
with changes in depression, impulsivity, delinquency, alcohol problems, family and friend
suicide history and domestic partnership violence (Thompson and Swartout, 2017). Step
1: Research AnalysisComplete the table belowTopic of Interest: Research Article:
Include full citation in APA format, as well as link or search details (such as DOI)
Thompson, M. P., & Swartout, K. (2018). Epidemiology of Suicide Attempts among
Youth Transitioning to Adulthood. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 47(4), 807–817.
https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0674-8 Discussion: Post
Intensive Care Syndrome Professional Practice Use:One or more professional practice uses
of the theories/concepts presented in the article Research Analysis MatrixAdd more
rows if necessary Strengths of the Research Limitations/Weaknesses of the
Research Relevancy to Topic of Interest Notes
Step 2: Summary of AnalysisWrite a 2- to 3-paragraph summary
that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that
includes the following:Clearly and accurately describe in detail your approach to identifying
and analyzing peer-reviewed research.Clearly identify and accurately describe in detail at
least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-
reviewed research.Provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of at least one
resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.Integrate at least
one outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources to fully support your summary. The
approaches methods I used to identify and analyze the peer-review research I
choseReference:November 2017 Perspectives Preview: Special Report: Suicide Prevention
in Health Care Settings. (n.d.). Retrieved May 3, 2019, from
https://www.jointcommission.org/issues/article.aspx?Article=GtNpk0ErgGF
7J9WOTTkXANZSEPXa1 KH0/4kGHCiio=Thompson, M. P., & Swartout, K. (2018).
Epidemiology of Suicide Attempts among Youth Transitioning to Adulthood. Journal of
Youth & Adolescence, 47(4), 807–817. https://doi-
org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0674-8 Thank you if you have any
question let me know on time. Rubric DetailSelect Grid View or List View to change the
rubric’s layout.Name: NURS_6002_Week_4_Assignment_Rubric• Grid View• List
ViewExcellent Good Fair PoorUsing the Week 4 Part 4 section of your Academic Success and
Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of

4. the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following: · The
topic of interest you have selected.· Correctly formatted APA citation of the article you
selected, along with link or search details.· Identify a professional practice use of the
theories/concepts presented in the article. 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)The response clearly
identifies the topic of interest selected.The response accurately and completely provides a
citation of the article selected, including an accurate and complete link or thorough search
details.The response clearly identifies and describes in detail a professional practice use of
the theories/concepts presented in the article. 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)The response partially
identifies the topic of interest selected.The response provides a partial citation of the article
selected, including a partial link or search details.The response partially identifies and
describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article. 14
(14%) – 15 (15%)The response vaguely identifies the topic of interest selected.The
response vaguely or inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague
or inaccurate search details.The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes a
professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article. 0 (0%) – 13
(13%)The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies the topic of interest selected, or is
missing.The response vaguely and inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected,
including vague and inaccurate search details, or is missing.The response vaguely and
inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts
presented in the article, or is missing.Analysis of the article using the Research Analysis
Matrix section of the template. Discussion: Post Intensive Care Syndrome · Write a one-
paragraph justification explaining whether or not you would recommend the use of this
article to inform professional practice. 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)The response clearly and
accurately provides a detailed analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix
section of the template.The response clearly and accurately explains in detail the
justification of whether to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)The response provides a partial analysis of the article using the
Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.The response partially explains the
justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional
practice. 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)The response provides a vague or inaccurate analysis of the
article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.The response vaguely or
inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article
to inform professional practice. 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)The response provides a vague and
inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template,
or is missing.The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the justification of whether or
not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice, or is missing.Write
a 2-3 paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional
Development Plan that includes the following: · Describe your approach to identifying and
analyzing peer-reviewed research· Identify at least two strategies that you would use that
you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.· Identify at least one resource
you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.· Iintegrate at least 1 outside
resource and 2-3 course specific resources to fully support summary. 41 (41%) – 45
(45%)The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the approach to identifying

5. and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response clearly identifies and accurately
describes in detail at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed
research.The response provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of at least one
outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The
response fully integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that
fully supports the summary provided. 36 (36%) – 40 (40%)The response partially
describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response
partially identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-
reviewed research.The response provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside
resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response
integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that support the
summary provided. 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)The response vaguely or inaccurately describes
the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response vaguely or
inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding
peer-reviewed research.The response vaguely or inaccurately synthesizes at least one
outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The
response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided. 0 (0%) –
31 (31%)The response vaguely and inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and
analyzing peer-reviewed research, or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately
identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed
research, or is missing.The response fails to integrate any resources that may be used in the
future to find peer-reviewed research to support the summary provided, or is
missing.Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and
Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow
logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long
and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose
statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. 5 (5%) – 5
(5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.A
clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided
which delineates all required criteria. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.Purpose, introduction,
and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5
(3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity
60%- 79% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or
off topic. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion
was provided.Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct
grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar,
spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar,
spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar,
spelling, and punctuation errors. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling,
and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.Written Expression
and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font,

6. spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations,
and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 (4%) – 4
(4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4)
APA format errors. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.Total Points:
100Name: NURS_6002_Week_4_Assignment_Rubric Discussion: Post Intensive Care
Syndrome