SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 40
Peptide Bioanalysis
Shiva Kumar Gudlawar
Senior Analyst
Buhoot Research Lab
Dubai
1
Overview
• Introduction
• Sample handling
• Why LCMS?
• Approach Using LCMS
• Case study
2
Synonyms
• Large molecules
• Macromolecules
• Biotherapeutics
• Biopharamceuticals
• Biologics
3
Biotherapeutics
• Monoclonal antibodies
• Therapeutic peptides
• Antibody drug conjugates(ADCs)
• Carrier conjugates
• Messenger RNA therapeutics
• Fusion proteins
4
Introduction
• Importance of Bio therapeutics drugs have increased enormously during
recent years owing to their high specificity and low toxicity.
• They vary from small peptides to large proteins to fusion proteins.
• Market valued at around US$199 billion in 2013 projected to grow by
13.5% by 2020
• More than 600 biological drugs are currently approved and now account
for 30% of all drugs in development.
• For Bioanalysis we segregate peptides from proteins based on size.
Molecular weight above 6000 Da classified as proteins.
• Many of therapeutic drugs are below 6000 Da so classified as peptides.
5
Sample handling
6
Solubility
• General rules in predicting Solubility
• Peptides shorter than 5 amino acids are generally aqueous soluble
• Peptides containing <25% of hydrophobic amino acids are aqueous soluble.
• Hydrophobic peptides containing 50% or more of hydrophobic amino acids are
insoluble or partially aqueous soluble. These peptides needs to be dissolved in
DMSO, DMF or acetonitrile before making aqueous dilutions.
• Peptides containing >75% of hydrophobic amino acids (DEHKNQRSTY) capable of
forming gels these peptides are solubilized in organic solvents or pH of the buffer
to be adjusted.
7
Stability
• Plasma contains preoteases which degrades protein or peptide by acting at amide
linkage.
• DEP(Diisopropylfluorophosphate), Cocktails (Sodium fluoride, potassium oxalate,
Trichloro acetic acid), pefabloc (better than DEP)
• Choice of stabilizer is compound dependant.
• Even acidifying with formic acid or TFA will inhibit proteases.
• Storage conditions like -20, -800C needs to be evaluated
• Use ice baths where ever possible to slow down the reaction.
• Plasma to be separated within half hour of blood collection and stored in
conditions specified.
8
Non Specific Binding
• Peptides often exhibit adsorption to vials and tubes at low
concentration.
• Responsible for inconsistent results.
• Use of low adsoption polypropylene tubes, silica deactivated glass are
suggested for making dilutions.
• To minimize the adsorption serial dilutions can be prepared in plasma
• For matrix free solutions solubility may be enhanced by aqueous-
organic mixtures, adding BSA or surfactants to block adsorption sites
• For extracted samples organic content should be kept around 20% to
minimize adsorption.
9
Why LCMS?
10
Major Techniques (LCMS, LBA)
• Advantages of LCMS over LBA
• Selectivity between similar peptides and proteins (quality information)
• No antibodies required (less chances of cross reactivity)
• Higher throughput (less time to develop methods and easy method transfer)
• Simultaneous measurement of multiple analytes
• High dynamic range (typically greater than 4 orders of magnitude)
• Internal standard
• Use of AC/LC-MSMS sensitivity can be greatly enhanced.
• No reagent development.
11
12
LCMS-Approach for peptide bioanalysis
13
Quantification through intact protein analysis.
• This approach is the true measurement of whole protein.
• MS uses SRM by Quadrapole and HRMS by Q-Tof or Orbitrap
• HRMS provides high level of selectivity owing to the mass accuracy and sensitivity
for some proteins which fragment poorly.
• HRMS may also have advantage of quantifying proteins and their derivatives after
biotransformation and post translation modifications.
• Currently this approach is used for peptides <10kDa molecular weight.
14
Protein ------- Sample prep-------LCMS
Surrogate peptide approach
• Commonly employed method for quantification of proteins.
• Usually signature peptides which are unique to the protein are selected.
• Selection Criteria:
1. Avoid peptides containing methionine, Cysteine or tryptophan
2. Avoid RR and KK in the sequence to minimize inconsistent digestion
3. Select peptides with length 5-15 amino acids.(too small too large may cause
specificity and selectivity issues)
• 4. Signature peptide can be generated by performing insilico digestion and can
be searched against all proteins in the biological matrices.
• https://www.expasy.org/proteomics
• http://www.uniprot.org/
15
Protein----digest-----peptides-----sample prep------LCMS
Protein digestion:
• Different enzymes used for digestion (trypsin, Glu-C, Lys-C, chymotrypsin, Asp-N)
• Trypsin is commonly employed owing to its availability, efficiency, low cost and
generates smaller fragments which are MS friendly.
• Conditions like incubation time, temperature, protein to enzyme ratio, organic
content around 10-30% ACN to speed up the time can be explored for efficient
and complete digestion.
• Pretreatment with Urea, rapigest and guanidine HCl will enhance the digestion
completeness.
• Denaturation, reduction and alkylation are required for complete sequence
coverage.
• For quantitative bioanalysis direct digestion will also give suroogate peptides
desired.
16
Sample clean up.
• Plasma contains more than 60% of Albumin and 30—35% of immunoiglobulins.
• Achieving analyte separation is essential to remove matrix effect or interfering
peaks caused by wide isotopic abundance caused by endogenous proteins and
peptides.
• Most of the peptides and proteins contains mixture of aminoacids. Achieving
sample clean up may be challenging.
• Molecules with high polar aminoacids display weak solubility and with high %
arginine residues will have a strong basic character.
• SPE followed by PPT is a good approach to start with.
17
Sample clean Up Cont…
• Generally larger protein precipitate around 40% of organic and smaller peptides
may need higher % of organic solvent.
• Aqueous acid preparations like 1% FA in ACN or 10% TFA in ACN can be tried if
recovery is not consistent.
• SPE avoids harsh organic conditions that can compromise solubility.
• Lower limits of quantitation can be achieved.
• Can be very selective with high recovery.
• Size exclusion can also be used prior to SPE to remove larger proteins.
• SPE needs expertise and with out SIL-IS chances of showing discrepancy in
recovery is more.
18
Chromatography
• For most LC seperations traditional C18 columns are good enough
• Recent advances in column technology of sub 2µ particles with pore size of 300
A0 will provide increased resolution, sensitivity and speed.
• Charge surface columns which will reduce secondary interactions are growing in
popularity.
• Decreasing flow rates to 200-400 µl/min, increasing column oven temperatures to
50 – 60 0C and performing shallower gradients will enhance sensitivity and peak
shape.
• Organic modifiers are always employed and acidic modifiers like formic acid and
TFA can also be tried to neutralize carboxyl.
• For very acidic and basic peptides or proteins ion exchange can also be tried.
19
Mass spectrometry.
• Peptide and proteins generally multiply charged in ES source
• Ratio of formation one charge state to other depends on flow rate and solvent
composition.
• So tuning to be performed with LC conditions.
• Peptides and proteins demonstrate wider isotopic distributions limiting the
sensitivity.
• Monitoring several charge states and isotopes can help in increasing the
sensitivity.
• Digestion of peptides and monitoring surrogate peptides will also help
• Peptides tend to fragment poorly. Increasing the collisional energy will
compromise the selectivity as it leads to individual amino acids.
• Avoid choosing immonium ions, water losses and adducts.
• Good practice is to choose b or y ions for specificity.
• With new technologies performing ETD will also generate more specific
fragments like a and z ions.
20
Challenges using LCMS
• Multiple charging and wide isotopic distribution restricts sensitivity
• Flow rate and solvent will effect charge state and ionization
• Poor fragmentation
• m/z value may exceed instruments mass range.
• Expertise
• Lack of regulatory guidance.
21
Method validation
22
Method Validation cont….
• For LBS 4-6-20 rule applies(4 out of 6 should be within 20% of nominal value)
• For LCMS 4-6-15 rule applies
• Stability testing of digested proteins (false negatives if the peptide shows Non
specific binding to wells, false positives if the peptide used is more stable than
whole protein )
• Challenges during immunocapture purification with respect to IS.
• All experiments needs to be performed as for small molecules like selectivity,
precision and accuracy, stability studies, robustness and ruggedness.
23
Case Study
Quantification of Peptide (Compound_T) in
Plasma by HRMS
(Orbitrap Fusion_Ultima 3000)
24
Blast to look for signature peptide
• https://www.expasy.org/proteomics
• http://www.uniprot.org/
25
Signature peptide (Insilico digest)
26
Signature peptide (Blast)
27
Native form of the Peptide
201216_IP_01 #37 RT: 0.13 AV: 1 SB: 946 0.65-3.95 NL: 2.83E6
F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [197.0777-1500.0000]
600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000 1050
m/z
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
696.1371
z=6
835.1633
z=5
596.8327
z=7
1043.7020
z=4
635.3307
z=1
762.0109
z=6
914.4121
z=5
701.6351
z=6
845.9447
z=5
628.8601
z=?
663.3625
z=1
686.6325
z=6
607.2689
z=1
811.3070
z=?
770.8507
z=?
883.4208
z=?
948.2571
z=?
992.8575
z=5
829.5631
z=?
743.3185
z=?
715.3081
z=?
1035.7438
z=?
Mass – 4171 Da
Dissolved in 10% ACN in water
(5ug/ml)
28
Reduced using DTT (600c for 30 min)
291216_TRIAL_IP_PEP_013 #1438 RT: 6.00 AV: 1 NL: 8.62E6
F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [197.0777-1500.0000]
600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000 1050
m/z
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
697.1456
z=6
836.3731
z=5
597.6971
z=7
1045.2148
z=4
706.1305
z=6
847.1561
z=5
687.6437
z=6
732.8215
z=6
824.7682
z=5
879.3820
z=5
762.6599
z=6
914.7878
z=5
974.5068
z=?
603.8462
z=7
660.8011
z=?
790.8429
z=2
1018.8467
z=?
947.5655
z=?
Reduced mass – 4177 Da
29
Reduced and alkylated using Iodoacetamide
201216_BLK_05 #640 RT: 2.12 AV: 1 NL: 8.87E7
F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [197.0777-1500.0000]
550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150
m/z
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
754.1687
z=6
646.5739
z=7 904.9985
z=5
1130.7469
z=4
565.8768
z=8 744.6634
z=6
761.1696
z=6638.4264
z=7
893.3944
z=5 1116.7415
z=4
913.0027
z=5
652.7184
z=7
1141.2510
z=4
735.1593
z=6
773.5038
z=6
613.9897
z=7
858.9816
z=5
1073.7217
z=4
580.3815
z=?
696.8102
z=?
829.5782
z=?
983.8463
z=?
1019.0507
z=?
Fixed modification of CAM +57.02.
Deconvuluted mass-4519 Da
30
Trypsin digest_peptide map(confirmation of
sequence)
RT: 0.00 - 35.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34
Time (min)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
15.78
11.82
1.32 13.20
15.97
16.20
16.8914.195.795.721.77 17.786.52 11.549.99 24.35 27.1520.28 22.98 31.9130.56 34.18
NL: 1.21E8
m/z=
246.1147-246.1197+303.1474-30
368.6723-368.6797+408.6503-40
463.2108-463.2200+573.2018-57
F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [197.077
201216_PEPMAP_TRYDIGEST_
Sequence- DCLGWFKGCD PDNDKCCEGY KCNRRDKWCK
2-17,9-22,46-29 disulfide linkages
PEPTIDE MASS MODIFICATION PEPTIDE SEQUENCE
859.3162 9,16,17 GCDPDNDKCCEGYK
463.2154 2 DCLGWFK
460.6743 9 GCDPDNDK
408.6544 16,17 CCEGYK
368.676 29 DKWCK
305.1734 YKLW
303.1504 22 CNRR
Digestion in 10% ACN for 4 hrs at
370c
31
MSMS spectra for peptide(DCLGWFK)-
463.2154(M+H)2+
080117_ext_TRIAL_041 #1886 RT: 3.95 AV: 1 SB: 245 3.37-3.85 , 4.05-5.09 NL: 1.45E5
F: FTMS + c ESI Full ms2 463.2154@hcd25.00 [100.0000-1200.0000]
150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900
m/z
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
650.3652
537.2812
463.1800
276.0645
133.0608
294.1808
248.0697
147.1128
357.1917
504.2860159.0764 448.1631
302.1134
405.7023
234.0541 820.3802336.2276
476.2634
630.4291 755.4230173.4111
712.4088561.3227 766.3542
668.3898
PEPTIDE SEQUENCE M/Z
DC LGWFK 650.3652
DCL GWFK 537.2812
DCLG WFK 480.2597
DCLGW FK 294.1808
DCLGWF K 147.1128
IMMONIUM IONS
129.1023(k)
159.0764(W)
120.0804(F)
characteristic mass presence of
k in the sequence
32
MSMS spectra for peptide(YKLW)-
305.1734(M+H)2+
080117_ext_TRIAL_041 #1858 RT: 3.89 AV: 1 SB: 244 3.37-3.85 , 4.05-5.09 NL: 1.99E5
F: FTMS + c ESI Full ms2 305.1734@hcd25.00 [100.0000-1200.0000]
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
m/z
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
136.0757
129.1022
188.0705
446.2754
305.1567
205.0970159.0916119.0492
242.1861
318.1807
292.1652
405.2495270.1812224.1753
428.2649387.2387
360.2266 468.1993 550.9755 590.5245492.5654 609.6941
328.7218182.5009
PEPTIDE SEQUENCE M/Z
Y KLW 446.2754
YK LW 318.1807
YKL W 205.097
IMMONIUM IONS
129.1023(K)
136.0757(Y)
159.0916(W)
33
Blank and LLOQ (1 ng/ml) of two unique peptides
RT: 0.00 - 8.00
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5
Time (min)
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
3.85
3.93
3.94
4.01
1.29
NL: 2.07E4
m/z= 446.2736-446.2780 F:
FTMS + c ESI Full ms2
305.1734@cid25.00
[100.0000-1200.0000] MS
080117_ext_TRIAL_029
NL: 3.21E4
m/z= 650.3630-650.3696 F:
FTMS + c ESI Full ms2
463.2154@cid25.00
[100.0000-1200.0000] MS
080117_ext_TRIAL_029
NL: 8.83E2
m/z= 446.2736-446.2780 F:
FTMS + c ESI Full ms2
305.1734@cid25.00
[100.0000-1200.0000] MS
080117_ext_trial_001
NL: 0
m/z= 305.1719-305.1749 F:
FTMS + c ESI Full ms2
463.2154@cid25.00
[100.0000-1200.0000] MS
080117_ext_trial_001
Lloq- 1 ng/ml
Plasma BLK
34
Chromatograms of different concentrations for
peptide YKLW
RT: 0.00 - 8.00
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0
Time (min)
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
1.29
3.85
3.93
3.83
3.93
3.87
3.95
3.83
3.91 4.02
NL: 8.83E2
m/z= 446.2736-446.2780 F:
FTMS + c ESI Full ms2
305.1734@cid25.00
[100.0000-1200.0000] MS
080117_ext_trial_001
NL: 2.07E4
m/z= 446.2736-446.2780 F:
FTMS + c ESI Full ms2
305.1734@cid25.00
[100.0000-1200.0000] MS
080117_ext_TRIAL_029
NL: 5.27E4
m/z= 446.2736-446.2780 F:
FTMS + c ESI Full ms2
305.1734@cid25.00
[100.0000-1200.0000] MS
080117_ext_trial_030
NL: 1.17E5
m/z= 446.2736-446.2780 F:
FTMS + c ESI Full ms2
305.1734@cid25.00
[100.0000-1200.0000] MS
080117_ext_trial_031
NL: 1.89E5
m/z= 446.2736-446.2780 F:
FTMS + c ESI Full ms2
305.1734@cid25.00
[100.0000-1200.0000] MS
080117_ext_TRIAL_032
1 ng/ml
2.5 ng/ml
blk
5ng/ml
10 ng/ml
35
Points to consider
• pH to be maintained at around 8 for Activity of DTT and Trypsin
• Percentage of organic modifier can be tried for enhanced digestion
• Sample were stored in -200c and were found to be stable for 14 days
• Ice bath was used during processing and temperature was maintained around 4
in centrifugal SPE.
• Oasis MAX was used as sorbent for sample clean up
• Protein heterogenicity to be considered (PTMs) and modifications during
processing.
• Calculation of net charge will also help in deciding SPE chemistry.
36
Conclusion
• Quantification using HRMS for proteins and large molecules gives better
selectivity and sensitivity.
• HRMS gives qualitative and quantitative data.
• Modifications can be detected.
• Intact protein bioanalysis
• Less time for development of analytical method.
• Depleting high abundance proteins can increase the sensitivity.
37
References
• http://www.ionsource.com/
• https://www.expasy.org/proteomics
• Therapeutic peptide bioanalysis_Sciex application note.
• Peptide and protein bioanalysis_Waters application note.
• Quantitative bioanalysis of proteins by mass spectrometry.
Long Yuan et al.
• Approaches to analyzing therapeutic peptides and proteins by LC-MS/MS. Matthew
Ewles
• LC-MSMS of large molecule in regulated bioanalytical environment-which acceptance
criteria to apply. Magnus Knotssun.
• Protein and peptide drug analysis by MS: Challenges and oppurtunities for the discovery
environment. J.larry CAmpbell
• LC-MS-based bioanalysis in support of protein biotherapeutics development:
• current challenges & emerging opportunities. Rand Jenkins 38
Acknowledgements
• Mrs. Huda Zaheer
• Mrs. Amrita Rajagopal
• Mr. Aazam Syed
• Dr. Dhanapal swaminathan
39
Large Meets Small
Thank You
40

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Bioanalytical ppt
Bioanalytical pptBioanalytical ppt
Bioanalytical ppt
 
Bioanalytical method development and validation .
Bioanalytical method development and validation .Bioanalytical method development and validation .
Bioanalytical method development and validation .
 
Bioanlytical method development
Bioanlytical method developmentBioanlytical method development
Bioanlytical method development
 
USFDA guidelines for bioanalytical method validation
USFDA guidelines for bioanalytical method validationUSFDA guidelines for bioanalytical method validation
USFDA guidelines for bioanalytical method validation
 
Capillary electrophoresis
Capillary electrophoresisCapillary electrophoresis
Capillary electrophoresis
 
ultra performance liquid chromatography ppt.by Manoj Ingale
ultra performance liquid chromatography ppt.by Manoj Ingaleultra performance liquid chromatography ppt.by Manoj Ingale
ultra performance liquid chromatography ppt.by Manoj Ingale
 
HPLC AND ITS APPLICATIONS
HPLC AND ITS APPLICATIONS HPLC AND ITS APPLICATIONS
HPLC AND ITS APPLICATIONS
 
Hplc in detail by Shree
Hplc in detail by ShreeHplc in detail by Shree
Hplc in detail by Shree
 
New developments in HPLC
New developments in HPLCNew developments in HPLC
New developments in HPLC
 
Size exclusion chromatography
Size exclusion chromatographySize exclusion chromatography
Size exclusion chromatography
 
Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography
Ultra Performance Liquid ChromatographyUltra Performance Liquid Chromatography
Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography
 
LC-MS in bioactivity screening and proteomics
LC-MS in bioactivity screening and proteomicsLC-MS in bioactivity screening and proteomics
LC-MS in bioactivity screening and proteomics
 
Oligosaccharide Analysis Using High-Performance Anion-Exchange Chromatography...
Oligosaccharide Analysis Using High-Performance Anion-Exchange Chromatography...Oligosaccharide Analysis Using High-Performance Anion-Exchange Chromatography...
Oligosaccharide Analysis Using High-Performance Anion-Exchange Chromatography...
 
Waters protein therapeutics application proctocols
Waters protein therapeutics application proctocolsWaters protein therapeutics application proctocols
Waters protein therapeutics application proctocols
 
Sample preparation and protocols in metabolite identification
Sample preparation and protocols in metabolite identificationSample preparation and protocols in metabolite identification
Sample preparation and protocols in metabolite identification
 
Capillary Electroporesis
Capillary ElectroporesisCapillary Electroporesis
Capillary Electroporesis
 
Capillary electrophoresis final ppt.
Capillary electrophoresis final ppt.Capillary electrophoresis final ppt.
Capillary electrophoresis final ppt.
 
General considerations and method development in ce,
General considerations and method development in ce,General considerations and method development in ce,
General considerations and method development in ce,
 
Bioanalytical method validation guidelines for ligand binding assays
Bioanalytical method validation guidelines for ligand binding assaysBioanalytical method validation guidelines for ligand binding assays
Bioanalytical method validation guidelines for ligand binding assays
 
Bioanalytical sample preparation
Bioanalytical sample preparationBioanalytical sample preparation
Bioanalytical sample preparation
 

Viewers also liked

Blacklight rocketengine
Blacklight rocketengineBlacklight rocketengine
Blacklight rocketengine
Clifford Stone
 
Zagor - 002 - rijecni duh part 2
Zagor - 002 - rijecni duh part 2Zagor - 002 - rijecni duh part 2
Zagor - 002 - rijecni duh part 2
Blagojce Treneski
 
Carmen - Bizet
Carmen - BizetCarmen - Bizet
Carmen - Bizet
stela s
 
Biotechnics.ltd 16.09.2014
Biotechnics.ltd 16.09.2014Biotechnics.ltd 16.09.2014
Biotechnics.ltd 16.09.2014
biotechnics
 
Matt Bivens resume 2016
Matt Bivens resume 2016Matt Bivens resume 2016
Matt Bivens resume 2016
Matthew Bivens
 
O P Manager
O P  ManagerO P  Manager
O P Manager
blakka
 
Bivalve: Cloïssa
Bivalve: CloïssaBivalve: Cloïssa
Bivalve: Cloïssa
arnaucanto
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Blacklight rocketengine
Blacklight rocketengineBlacklight rocketengine
Blacklight rocketengine
 
Grammar Presentation: Rob & Bithiah
Grammar Presentation: Rob & BithiahGrammar Presentation: Rob & Bithiah
Grammar Presentation: Rob & Bithiah
 
What is open space technology
What is open space technologyWhat is open space technology
What is open space technology
 
Zagor - 002 - rijecni duh part 2
Zagor - 002 - rijecni duh part 2Zagor - 002 - rijecni duh part 2
Zagor - 002 - rijecni duh part 2
 
Carmen - Bizet
Carmen - BizetCarmen - Bizet
Carmen - Bizet
 
Blacharz samochodowy
Blacharz samochodowyBlacharz samochodowy
Blacharz samochodowy
 
Biseri
BiseriBiseri
Biseri
 
Biogas
BiogasBiogas
Biogas
 
Pagerank
PagerankPagerank
Pagerank
 
il Portico 318
il Portico 318il Portico 318
il Portico 318
 
Buyer secretsbook[1]
Buyer secretsbook[1]Buyer secretsbook[1]
Buyer secretsbook[1]
 
Csiro case study
Csiro case studyCsiro case study
Csiro case study
 
Bilton Wines
Bilton WinesBilton Wines
Bilton Wines
 
Producción del Biocarbón
Producción del BiocarbónProducción del Biocarbón
Producción del Biocarbón
 
Biotechnics.ltd 16.09.2014
Biotechnics.ltd 16.09.2014Biotechnics.ltd 16.09.2014
Biotechnics.ltd 16.09.2014
 
Matt Bivens resume 2016
Matt Bivens resume 2016Matt Bivens resume 2016
Matt Bivens resume 2016
 
O P Manager
O P  ManagerO P  Manager
O P Manager
 
Resolución arroz 2014
Resolución arroz 2014Resolución arroz 2014
Resolución arroz 2014
 
Bizkaia
Bizkaia Bizkaia
Bizkaia
 
Bivalve: Cloïssa
Bivalve: CloïssaBivalve: Cloïssa
Bivalve: Cloïssa
 

Similar to Peptide_Bioanalysis (1)

Enhanced bioseparations peptide mapping and m abs
Enhanced bioseparations peptide mapping and m absEnhanced bioseparations peptide mapping and m abs
Enhanced bioseparations peptide mapping and m abs
Oskari Aro
 

Similar to Peptide_Bioanalysis (1) (20)

Production of recombinant proteins
Production of recombinant proteins Production of recombinant proteins
Production of recombinant proteins
 
Enhanced bioseparations peptide mapping and m abs
Enhanced bioseparations peptide mapping and m absEnhanced bioseparations peptide mapping and m abs
Enhanced bioseparations peptide mapping and m abs
 
proteomics lecture as an aspect of multi omics
proteomics lecture as an aspect of multi omicsproteomics lecture as an aspect of multi omics
proteomics lecture as an aspect of multi omics
 
proteomics lecture 2b.ppt
proteomics lecture 2b.pptproteomics lecture 2b.ppt
proteomics lecture 2b.ppt
 
proteomics lecture 2b.ppt protein structure determination
proteomics lecture 2b.ppt protein structure determinationproteomics lecture 2b.ppt protein structure determination
proteomics lecture 2b.ppt protein structure determination
 
Protein Electrophoresis & Gas Liquid Chromatography & HPLC Applications
 Protein Electrophoresis  & Gas Liquid Chromatography &  HPLC Applications  Protein Electrophoresis  & Gas Liquid Chromatography &  HPLC Applications
Protein Electrophoresis & Gas Liquid Chromatography & HPLC Applications
 
Techniques used for separation in proteomics
Techniques used for separation in proteomicsTechniques used for separation in proteomics
Techniques used for separation in proteomics
 
Aptamers and antisense oligonucleotides
Aptamers and antisense oligonucleotidesAptamers and antisense oligonucleotides
Aptamers and antisense oligonucleotides
 
Fplc(fast protein liquid chromatography )
Fplc(fast protein liquid chromatography )Fplc(fast protein liquid chromatography )
Fplc(fast protein liquid chromatography )
 
Agarose gel electrophoresis and western blotting
Agarose gel electrophoresis and western blottingAgarose gel electrophoresis and western blotting
Agarose gel electrophoresis and western blotting
 
Protein analysis
Protein analysisProtein analysis
Protein analysis
 
Protein Purification
Protein PurificationProtein Purification
Protein Purification
 
Peptide mapping
Peptide mappingPeptide mapping
Peptide mapping
 
Chapter 2 molecular methods in cancer
Chapter 2 molecular methods in cancerChapter 2 molecular methods in cancer
Chapter 2 molecular methods in cancer
 
Affinity chromatography.pptx
Affinity chromatography.pptxAffinity chromatography.pptx
Affinity chromatography.pptx
 
219158 lecture 9
219158 lecture 9219158 lecture 9
219158 lecture 9
 
Stability to changes in amino acid sequence.pptx
Stability to changes in amino acid sequence.pptxStability to changes in amino acid sequence.pptx
Stability to changes in amino acid sequence.pptx
 
Aqueous two phase extraction
Aqueous two phase extractionAqueous two phase extraction
Aqueous two phase extraction
 
Protein purification chp-5-bioc-361-version-oct-2012
Protein purification chp-5-bioc-361-version-oct-2012Protein purification chp-5-bioc-361-version-oct-2012
Protein purification chp-5-bioc-361-version-oct-2012
 
GEL PERMEATİON CHROMATOGRAPHY (GPC).pptx
GEL PERMEATİON CHROMATOGRAPHY (GPC).pptxGEL PERMEATİON CHROMATOGRAPHY (GPC).pptx
GEL PERMEATİON CHROMATOGRAPHY (GPC).pptx
 

Peptide_Bioanalysis (1)

  • 1. Peptide Bioanalysis Shiva Kumar Gudlawar Senior Analyst Buhoot Research Lab Dubai 1
  • 2. Overview • Introduction • Sample handling • Why LCMS? • Approach Using LCMS • Case study 2
  • 3. Synonyms • Large molecules • Macromolecules • Biotherapeutics • Biopharamceuticals • Biologics 3
  • 4. Biotherapeutics • Monoclonal antibodies • Therapeutic peptides • Antibody drug conjugates(ADCs) • Carrier conjugates • Messenger RNA therapeutics • Fusion proteins 4
  • 5. Introduction • Importance of Bio therapeutics drugs have increased enormously during recent years owing to their high specificity and low toxicity. • They vary from small peptides to large proteins to fusion proteins. • Market valued at around US$199 billion in 2013 projected to grow by 13.5% by 2020 • More than 600 biological drugs are currently approved and now account for 30% of all drugs in development. • For Bioanalysis we segregate peptides from proteins based on size. Molecular weight above 6000 Da classified as proteins. • Many of therapeutic drugs are below 6000 Da so classified as peptides. 5
  • 7. Solubility • General rules in predicting Solubility • Peptides shorter than 5 amino acids are generally aqueous soluble • Peptides containing <25% of hydrophobic amino acids are aqueous soluble. • Hydrophobic peptides containing 50% or more of hydrophobic amino acids are insoluble or partially aqueous soluble. These peptides needs to be dissolved in DMSO, DMF or acetonitrile before making aqueous dilutions. • Peptides containing >75% of hydrophobic amino acids (DEHKNQRSTY) capable of forming gels these peptides are solubilized in organic solvents or pH of the buffer to be adjusted. 7
  • 8. Stability • Plasma contains preoteases which degrades protein or peptide by acting at amide linkage. • DEP(Diisopropylfluorophosphate), Cocktails (Sodium fluoride, potassium oxalate, Trichloro acetic acid), pefabloc (better than DEP) • Choice of stabilizer is compound dependant. • Even acidifying with formic acid or TFA will inhibit proteases. • Storage conditions like -20, -800C needs to be evaluated • Use ice baths where ever possible to slow down the reaction. • Plasma to be separated within half hour of blood collection and stored in conditions specified. 8
  • 9. Non Specific Binding • Peptides often exhibit adsorption to vials and tubes at low concentration. • Responsible for inconsistent results. • Use of low adsoption polypropylene tubes, silica deactivated glass are suggested for making dilutions. • To minimize the adsorption serial dilutions can be prepared in plasma • For matrix free solutions solubility may be enhanced by aqueous- organic mixtures, adding BSA or surfactants to block adsorption sites • For extracted samples organic content should be kept around 20% to minimize adsorption. 9
  • 11. Major Techniques (LCMS, LBA) • Advantages of LCMS over LBA • Selectivity between similar peptides and proteins (quality information) • No antibodies required (less chances of cross reactivity) • Higher throughput (less time to develop methods and easy method transfer) • Simultaneous measurement of multiple analytes • High dynamic range (typically greater than 4 orders of magnitude) • Internal standard • Use of AC/LC-MSMS sensitivity can be greatly enhanced. • No reagent development. 11
  • 12. 12
  • 13. LCMS-Approach for peptide bioanalysis 13
  • 14. Quantification through intact protein analysis. • This approach is the true measurement of whole protein. • MS uses SRM by Quadrapole and HRMS by Q-Tof or Orbitrap • HRMS provides high level of selectivity owing to the mass accuracy and sensitivity for some proteins which fragment poorly. • HRMS may also have advantage of quantifying proteins and their derivatives after biotransformation and post translation modifications. • Currently this approach is used for peptides <10kDa molecular weight. 14 Protein ------- Sample prep-------LCMS
  • 15. Surrogate peptide approach • Commonly employed method for quantification of proteins. • Usually signature peptides which are unique to the protein are selected. • Selection Criteria: 1. Avoid peptides containing methionine, Cysteine or tryptophan 2. Avoid RR and KK in the sequence to minimize inconsistent digestion 3. Select peptides with length 5-15 amino acids.(too small too large may cause specificity and selectivity issues) • 4. Signature peptide can be generated by performing insilico digestion and can be searched against all proteins in the biological matrices. • https://www.expasy.org/proteomics • http://www.uniprot.org/ 15 Protein----digest-----peptides-----sample prep------LCMS
  • 16. Protein digestion: • Different enzymes used for digestion (trypsin, Glu-C, Lys-C, chymotrypsin, Asp-N) • Trypsin is commonly employed owing to its availability, efficiency, low cost and generates smaller fragments which are MS friendly. • Conditions like incubation time, temperature, protein to enzyme ratio, organic content around 10-30% ACN to speed up the time can be explored for efficient and complete digestion. • Pretreatment with Urea, rapigest and guanidine HCl will enhance the digestion completeness. • Denaturation, reduction and alkylation are required for complete sequence coverage. • For quantitative bioanalysis direct digestion will also give suroogate peptides desired. 16
  • 17. Sample clean up. • Plasma contains more than 60% of Albumin and 30—35% of immunoiglobulins. • Achieving analyte separation is essential to remove matrix effect or interfering peaks caused by wide isotopic abundance caused by endogenous proteins and peptides. • Most of the peptides and proteins contains mixture of aminoacids. Achieving sample clean up may be challenging. • Molecules with high polar aminoacids display weak solubility and with high % arginine residues will have a strong basic character. • SPE followed by PPT is a good approach to start with. 17
  • 18. Sample clean Up Cont… • Generally larger protein precipitate around 40% of organic and smaller peptides may need higher % of organic solvent. • Aqueous acid preparations like 1% FA in ACN or 10% TFA in ACN can be tried if recovery is not consistent. • SPE avoids harsh organic conditions that can compromise solubility. • Lower limits of quantitation can be achieved. • Can be very selective with high recovery. • Size exclusion can also be used prior to SPE to remove larger proteins. • SPE needs expertise and with out SIL-IS chances of showing discrepancy in recovery is more. 18
  • 19. Chromatography • For most LC seperations traditional C18 columns are good enough • Recent advances in column technology of sub 2µ particles with pore size of 300 A0 will provide increased resolution, sensitivity and speed. • Charge surface columns which will reduce secondary interactions are growing in popularity. • Decreasing flow rates to 200-400 µl/min, increasing column oven temperatures to 50 – 60 0C and performing shallower gradients will enhance sensitivity and peak shape. • Organic modifiers are always employed and acidic modifiers like formic acid and TFA can also be tried to neutralize carboxyl. • For very acidic and basic peptides or proteins ion exchange can also be tried. 19
  • 20. Mass spectrometry. • Peptide and proteins generally multiply charged in ES source • Ratio of formation one charge state to other depends on flow rate and solvent composition. • So tuning to be performed with LC conditions. • Peptides and proteins demonstrate wider isotopic distributions limiting the sensitivity. • Monitoring several charge states and isotopes can help in increasing the sensitivity. • Digestion of peptides and monitoring surrogate peptides will also help • Peptides tend to fragment poorly. Increasing the collisional energy will compromise the selectivity as it leads to individual amino acids. • Avoid choosing immonium ions, water losses and adducts. • Good practice is to choose b or y ions for specificity. • With new technologies performing ETD will also generate more specific fragments like a and z ions. 20
  • 21. Challenges using LCMS • Multiple charging and wide isotopic distribution restricts sensitivity • Flow rate and solvent will effect charge state and ionization • Poor fragmentation • m/z value may exceed instruments mass range. • Expertise • Lack of regulatory guidance. 21
  • 23. Method Validation cont…. • For LBS 4-6-20 rule applies(4 out of 6 should be within 20% of nominal value) • For LCMS 4-6-15 rule applies • Stability testing of digested proteins (false negatives if the peptide shows Non specific binding to wells, false positives if the peptide used is more stable than whole protein ) • Challenges during immunocapture purification with respect to IS. • All experiments needs to be performed as for small molecules like selectivity, precision and accuracy, stability studies, robustness and ruggedness. 23
  • 24. Case Study Quantification of Peptide (Compound_T) in Plasma by HRMS (Orbitrap Fusion_Ultima 3000) 24
  • 25. Blast to look for signature peptide • https://www.expasy.org/proteomics • http://www.uniprot.org/ 25
  • 28. Native form of the Peptide 201216_IP_01 #37 RT: 0.13 AV: 1 SB: 946 0.65-3.95 NL: 2.83E6 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [197.0777-1500.0000] 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 m/z 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 696.1371 z=6 835.1633 z=5 596.8327 z=7 1043.7020 z=4 635.3307 z=1 762.0109 z=6 914.4121 z=5 701.6351 z=6 845.9447 z=5 628.8601 z=? 663.3625 z=1 686.6325 z=6 607.2689 z=1 811.3070 z=? 770.8507 z=? 883.4208 z=? 948.2571 z=? 992.8575 z=5 829.5631 z=? 743.3185 z=? 715.3081 z=? 1035.7438 z=? Mass – 4171 Da Dissolved in 10% ACN in water (5ug/ml) 28
  • 29. Reduced using DTT (600c for 30 min) 291216_TRIAL_IP_PEP_013 #1438 RT: 6.00 AV: 1 NL: 8.62E6 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [197.0777-1500.0000] 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 m/z 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 697.1456 z=6 836.3731 z=5 597.6971 z=7 1045.2148 z=4 706.1305 z=6 847.1561 z=5 687.6437 z=6 732.8215 z=6 824.7682 z=5 879.3820 z=5 762.6599 z=6 914.7878 z=5 974.5068 z=? 603.8462 z=7 660.8011 z=? 790.8429 z=2 1018.8467 z=? 947.5655 z=? Reduced mass – 4177 Da 29
  • 30. Reduced and alkylated using Iodoacetamide 201216_BLK_05 #640 RT: 2.12 AV: 1 NL: 8.87E7 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [197.0777-1500.0000] 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 m/z 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 754.1687 z=6 646.5739 z=7 904.9985 z=5 1130.7469 z=4 565.8768 z=8 744.6634 z=6 761.1696 z=6638.4264 z=7 893.3944 z=5 1116.7415 z=4 913.0027 z=5 652.7184 z=7 1141.2510 z=4 735.1593 z=6 773.5038 z=6 613.9897 z=7 858.9816 z=5 1073.7217 z=4 580.3815 z=? 696.8102 z=? 829.5782 z=? 983.8463 z=? 1019.0507 z=? Fixed modification of CAM +57.02. Deconvuluted mass-4519 Da 30
  • 31. Trypsin digest_peptide map(confirmation of sequence) RT: 0.00 - 35.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 Time (min) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 15.78 11.82 1.32 13.20 15.97 16.20 16.8914.195.795.721.77 17.786.52 11.549.99 24.35 27.1520.28 22.98 31.9130.56 34.18 NL: 1.21E8 m/z= 246.1147-246.1197+303.1474-30 368.6723-368.6797+408.6503-40 463.2108-463.2200+573.2018-57 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [197.077 201216_PEPMAP_TRYDIGEST_ Sequence- DCLGWFKGCD PDNDKCCEGY KCNRRDKWCK 2-17,9-22,46-29 disulfide linkages PEPTIDE MASS MODIFICATION PEPTIDE SEQUENCE 859.3162 9,16,17 GCDPDNDKCCEGYK 463.2154 2 DCLGWFK 460.6743 9 GCDPDNDK 408.6544 16,17 CCEGYK 368.676 29 DKWCK 305.1734 YKLW 303.1504 22 CNRR Digestion in 10% ACN for 4 hrs at 370c 31
  • 32. MSMS spectra for peptide(DCLGWFK)- 463.2154(M+H)2+ 080117_ext_TRIAL_041 #1886 RT: 3.95 AV: 1 SB: 245 3.37-3.85 , 4.05-5.09 NL: 1.45E5 F: FTMS + c ESI Full ms2 463.2154@hcd25.00 [100.0000-1200.0000] 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 m/z 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 650.3652 537.2812 463.1800 276.0645 133.0608 294.1808 248.0697 147.1128 357.1917 504.2860159.0764 448.1631 302.1134 405.7023 234.0541 820.3802336.2276 476.2634 630.4291 755.4230173.4111 712.4088561.3227 766.3542 668.3898 PEPTIDE SEQUENCE M/Z DC LGWFK 650.3652 DCL GWFK 537.2812 DCLG WFK 480.2597 DCLGW FK 294.1808 DCLGWF K 147.1128 IMMONIUM IONS 129.1023(k) 159.0764(W) 120.0804(F) characteristic mass presence of k in the sequence 32
  • 33. MSMS spectra for peptide(YKLW)- 305.1734(M+H)2+ 080117_ext_TRIAL_041 #1858 RT: 3.89 AV: 1 SB: 244 3.37-3.85 , 4.05-5.09 NL: 1.99E5 F: FTMS + c ESI Full ms2 305.1734@hcd25.00 [100.0000-1200.0000] 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 m/z 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 136.0757 129.1022 188.0705 446.2754 305.1567 205.0970159.0916119.0492 242.1861 318.1807 292.1652 405.2495270.1812224.1753 428.2649387.2387 360.2266 468.1993 550.9755 590.5245492.5654 609.6941 328.7218182.5009 PEPTIDE SEQUENCE M/Z Y KLW 446.2754 YK LW 318.1807 YKL W 205.097 IMMONIUM IONS 129.1023(K) 136.0757(Y) 159.0916(W) 33
  • 34. Blank and LLOQ (1 ng/ml) of two unique peptides RT: 0.00 - 8.00 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 Time (min) 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 3.85 3.93 3.94 4.01 1.29 NL: 2.07E4 m/z= 446.2736-446.2780 F: FTMS + c ESI Full ms2 305.1734@cid25.00 [100.0000-1200.0000] MS 080117_ext_TRIAL_029 NL: 3.21E4 m/z= 650.3630-650.3696 F: FTMS + c ESI Full ms2 463.2154@cid25.00 [100.0000-1200.0000] MS 080117_ext_TRIAL_029 NL: 8.83E2 m/z= 446.2736-446.2780 F: FTMS + c ESI Full ms2 305.1734@cid25.00 [100.0000-1200.0000] MS 080117_ext_trial_001 NL: 0 m/z= 305.1719-305.1749 F: FTMS + c ESI Full ms2 463.2154@cid25.00 [100.0000-1200.0000] MS 080117_ext_trial_001 Lloq- 1 ng/ml Plasma BLK 34
  • 35. Chromatograms of different concentrations for peptide YKLW RT: 0.00 - 8.00 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 Time (min) 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 1.29 3.85 3.93 3.83 3.93 3.87 3.95 3.83 3.91 4.02 NL: 8.83E2 m/z= 446.2736-446.2780 F: FTMS + c ESI Full ms2 305.1734@cid25.00 [100.0000-1200.0000] MS 080117_ext_trial_001 NL: 2.07E4 m/z= 446.2736-446.2780 F: FTMS + c ESI Full ms2 305.1734@cid25.00 [100.0000-1200.0000] MS 080117_ext_TRIAL_029 NL: 5.27E4 m/z= 446.2736-446.2780 F: FTMS + c ESI Full ms2 305.1734@cid25.00 [100.0000-1200.0000] MS 080117_ext_trial_030 NL: 1.17E5 m/z= 446.2736-446.2780 F: FTMS + c ESI Full ms2 305.1734@cid25.00 [100.0000-1200.0000] MS 080117_ext_trial_031 NL: 1.89E5 m/z= 446.2736-446.2780 F: FTMS + c ESI Full ms2 305.1734@cid25.00 [100.0000-1200.0000] MS 080117_ext_TRIAL_032 1 ng/ml 2.5 ng/ml blk 5ng/ml 10 ng/ml 35
  • 36. Points to consider • pH to be maintained at around 8 for Activity of DTT and Trypsin • Percentage of organic modifier can be tried for enhanced digestion • Sample were stored in -200c and were found to be stable for 14 days • Ice bath was used during processing and temperature was maintained around 4 in centrifugal SPE. • Oasis MAX was used as sorbent for sample clean up • Protein heterogenicity to be considered (PTMs) and modifications during processing. • Calculation of net charge will also help in deciding SPE chemistry. 36
  • 37. Conclusion • Quantification using HRMS for proteins and large molecules gives better selectivity and sensitivity. • HRMS gives qualitative and quantitative data. • Modifications can be detected. • Intact protein bioanalysis • Less time for development of analytical method. • Depleting high abundance proteins can increase the sensitivity. 37
  • 38. References • http://www.ionsource.com/ • https://www.expasy.org/proteomics • Therapeutic peptide bioanalysis_Sciex application note. • Peptide and protein bioanalysis_Waters application note. • Quantitative bioanalysis of proteins by mass spectrometry. Long Yuan et al. • Approaches to analyzing therapeutic peptides and proteins by LC-MS/MS. Matthew Ewles • LC-MSMS of large molecule in regulated bioanalytical environment-which acceptance criteria to apply. Magnus Knotssun. • Protein and peptide drug analysis by MS: Challenges and oppurtunities for the discovery environment. J.larry CAmpbell • LC-MS-based bioanalysis in support of protein biotherapeutics development: • current challenges & emerging opportunities. Rand Jenkins 38
  • 39. Acknowledgements • Mrs. Huda Zaheer • Mrs. Amrita Rajagopal • Mr. Aazam Syed • Dr. Dhanapal swaminathan 39