SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 37
Download to read offline
Exploring female athletes
motives for participation:
Does the gender of the coach really matter?
            Stefanie A. Latham, Ph.D.
            Oklahoma City University
               slatham@okcu.edu
Introduction
• Title IX and increasing numbers of female
   athletes


• Only 41.4% of women’s teams (and less than
  2% of men’s teams) were led by a female
  head coach — the lowest level of
  representation ever, down from more than
  90% when Title IX was enacted. (Acosta &
  Carpenter, 2009).
Percentage of Women's Teams Coached by
                               Females


100.0%        90% PLUS
 90.0%
 80.0%
 70.0%                              58%
 60.0%                                     54%
                                                  47%    46%    44%
 50.0%
 40.0%
 30.0%
 20.0%
 10.0%
  0.0%
                1972                1978   1984   1990   2000   2002
         Acosta & Carpenter, 2002
Increasing Female Sport
   Participation Continues
Since 1975 there has been an 875%
increase in female high school athletic
participation
435% increase in college (including, all
4-year, post-high school, and 2-year
institutions)
Quote from latest research
              data
• You know how girls can hate their female coach, but they
  probably wouldn't ever hate their guy coach like they would
  their girl coach? He could be as rude as hell and we'll be
  like, "it's just his personality", but if it’s a girl coach we're
  like, "Oh she has something against me or she hates
  me"…Like male coaches can be really rude and mean and
  we can get over it, but when female coaches are that
  way, you pretty much just think they are [assholes], and
  you can’t get over that… My AAU coach [who was male]
  was kind of like my high school coach was, like I described
  earlier, but everyone still thought he was a good coach.
  But my female high school coach who had the same
  personality, no one thought she was a good coach. They
  both knew the game really well and knew the skills and stuff
  and they both had kind of the same personality, but my guy
  coach was still thought of as being a good coach, I guess
  we just didn't take his crap so personally. (Michelle)
Problem
• Gender bias toward female
  coaches?????
  • Hiring practices of athletic
    directors is well documented
  • Athletes’ perceptions of their
    coaches behaviors and
    gender preferences for coach
    not explored very well
True or False?
―Female coaches aren't winning
  championships. This proves that male
  coaches are better.‖
"Women are less intense. They aren't as
 demanding of their players. They aren't
 strong enough."
―Women turn other women off. It's easier
 to take coaching from a man.‖
―You don't have to worry about the coach
  being a lesbian when you have a male
  coach.‖
Brief Review of the
              Literature
• Williams and Parkhouse (1986)
  • High school basketball players
  • Asked to indicate their preference between
    a hypothetical male or female coach who
    was classified as either successful or
    unsuccessful
  • Overall, 89% of male athletes and 71% of
    female athletes preferred a male coach
    despite success rate….WHAT???
  • Rated males as more knowledgeable, more
    likely to achieve future success, more
    desirable to play for, and having a greater
    ability to motivate.
Lit Review
• Weinberg, Reveles, and Jackson (1994)
  • examined both male and female basketball
    players from JH, HS, and College
  • Asked to indicate their attitudes and
    feelings towards hypothetical male and
    female coaches
  • Both M & F exhibited more negative
    attitudes towards female coaches than
    male coaches
  • ranked female coaches as superior in
    coaching qualities of relating well to others
    and understanding athletes' feelings (two
Lit Review
• Medwechuk and Crossman (1994)
  • Male and Female Swimmers
    preferred male coaches
  • Both rated hypothetical male
    coaches with better abilities to
    motivate and more knowledgeable
    than hypo female coaches
    regardless success status (W/L
    record)
Problem
• Old Data…
• Quantitative statistical analyses - Not
  clear
• Used hypo scenarios only
• Specific Behaviors not identified
• Not very many sports (basketball mainly)
• Differences bt. Team and individual sports
  not investigated
• No voice given to athletes
Some Hope
• CBQ, Martin and Barnes (1999)
  • Demographic section = athlete’s
    age, gender, race, educational
    level, sport most played, years of
    participation, and asks
    preferences of the gender and
    age of the coach
  • Coaching behaviors section – 12
    behavioral categories
  • R&V missing and or still being
    investigated
Coaching Behaviors
           Questionnaire
• Coaching behaviors that occur in practice or games
  •   Reinforcement
  •   Non-reinforcement
  •   Mistake contingent encouragement
  •   Mistake contingent technical instruction
  •   Punishment
  •   Punitive technical instruction
  •   Ignoring mistakes
  •   Keeping control
  •   General technical instruction
  •   General encouragement
  •   Organization
  •   General communication
Little-Lit Review
• Individual Sport athletes prefer training
  and instruction more than Team sport
  athletes
• Males prefer more autocratic behavior
  than females
• Females prefer democratic behaviors of
  coaches –participative in decisions
  pertaining to goals, methods, and
  strategies, but not studied very
  much…female voice is scarce.
Problem continues
• CBQ is new and hasn’t been used
  much
• Kravig (2003) quant found female
  athletes to prefer different coaching
  behaviors than male athletes
  particularly regarding general
  encouragement and communication
  and females didn’t like to be
  punished
• Preference of gender of the coach
  not indicated
Purpose
• The purpose of my present study is to mix both
  research methodologies to:
  • Quantitatively investigate preferred & actual
    coaching behaviors preferences of collegiate
    athletes AND whether coaching behaviors
    differ as a function of the gender of the coach
    • Sub-questions= type of sport
       (coactive, interactive, mixed) & level of
       collegiate play (JUCO, NAIA, NCAA I & II)
  • Qualitatively obtain a first-person perspective
    of the females athlete’s experiences of playing
    for a male vs. female coach AND hear in the
    words of the athletes themselves the preferred
    coaching behaviors
Participants
• So far…. 298 collegiate female athletes -
  Caucasian (n=168), African-American (n= 95)
  Hispanic (n=22), Asian (n=13);18-25 years of
  age (M = 20.7; s = 2.2); 164 NAIA; 134 NCAA
  D2
• 60 Coactive sports - golf (n=37) and wrestling
  (n=23) (yes we have female wrestling!!);
• 81 Mixed sports - softball (n=55), track and
  field (n=36);
• 157 Interactive sports- basketball
  (n=53), soccer (n=46), volleyball (n =58).
Instruments
• CBQ (R & V) and Interview Guide =
  • What sport do you play
  • When were you coached by a male and a female
  • How many years were you coached by the male and
    female coach
  • Which coach did you prefer the most and why
  • If you had daughters whom would you want them to be
    coached by? Why?
  • Differences/similarities bt. male and female coaches in:
    •   Training practices and evaluation of performance
    •   Encouragement/motivation
    •   Helping with personal problem and enjoyment
    •   Coaching methods
    •   Feedback after mistakes and correcting behaviors
    •   In general, what are your thoughts about males and females
        coaching female athletes
Prelim Quant Results
• Means scores on the subscales of the
  CBQ = DV, gender of coach and type of
  sport = IVs
• 2 X 3 (Gender of coach X Sport Type)
  MANOVA used to determine if differences
  exist as of function of the gender of the
  coach and sport type
• Alpha level .01 to decrease error
• Follow-up discriminant function analyses
  and univariate ANOVAs used to id which
  coaching behaviors maximized
  differences among the groups
Quant Results
                 Actual
• MANOVA produced significant multivariate main
  effect for the gender of the coach
  • F(12, 260) = 4.62, p = .0001, eta 2 = .18

• Discriminant analyses reveal
  • Punishment and Keeping Control were not
    significant
  • Female coaches were rated higher in
    Reinforcement, Mistake contingent
    Encouragement, General Encouragement and
    General Communication….hummm
  • Male coaches rated higher in Organization, Punitive
    Technical Instruction, and MCT
    Instruction…hummm
Quant results
    Type of Sport Preferences
• MANOVA revealed a significant multivariate main
  effect for type of sport
• Follow-ups analyses indicated that:
  • Interactive sports preferred reinforcement,
    punishment, mistake contingent
    encouragement, general encouragement,
    general communication, and ignoring mistakes
    more than coactive and mixed sports
  • Coactive sports preferred non-reinforcement,
    mistake contingent technical instruction, and
    GT Instruction more than interactive and mixed
  • Mixed sports resembled interactive, but to
    lesser extent
Qual Results
• 11 interviews so far…..
• All NAIA, 5 African-Americans, 4 Caucasian, 1
  Asian
• Basketball (2), Soccer (1), Volleyball (1),
• Golf (2), Wrestling (1 who had actually had a
  female coach….hummm),
• Softball (2), Track and Field (2).
• These have been transcribed: themes not
  coded yet but discussion of possibilities are
  on sticky notes everywhere!!!!!!
Interesting quotes
―He was much more together, he knew structure.
  He knew exactly where we needed to be, what
  time we needed to start‖

―My male coach would sit down before a game and
  write down every possible thing the other team
  could do to beat us; and then write down next to
  it exactly what we could do to defend them‖

Referring to her male coach ―drills in practice
  always had a purpose and were very organized‖

―expected more‖ ―no excuses‖
―With my female coach, she had different stuff
  everyday. We never knew what to expect out of
  her mood and it would take her 10 minutes to
  explain what we’re supposed to do in a drill and
  then it wouldn’t work well…so we’d just look at
  each other like…what the heck, she doesn’t
  know what's going on‖
―She never kept score, or held us to a time limit.
  We always knew we weren’t going to be really
  disciplined and whatever rules were in place
  didn’t apply to her favorites‖
• ―My female coaches, I always had more fun with
  ya know, like they always knew how to relate to
  us…but then again I think that made it harder to
  swallow when she got on to us for stuff‖
• ―In general, girl coaches are gonna be better at
  encouraging and motivating just because
  females are more encouraging than males‖
• ―With my male coaches its all about the X's and
  O’s. There was no bond. If something was
  personally bothering me my female coach would
  pick up on it and sympathize or at least ask
  what's wrong. My male coach would just punish
  us for lack of effort and didn’t care about our
Preference for the
      Gender of the coach
• All interviewees prefer a male coach
  overall
  • More knowledge
  • More challenging
  • Demand more respect
• Possible themes
  • Discipline and Structure
  • Personal Relationships
  • Passivity and Aggressiveness
Conclusions for now…
• Quantitatively just scratching the surface (more
  balance in type of sport), level of collegiate play
  not done yet
  • Can/Will coaches learn to effectively integrate
    and blend autocratic and democratic styles
    despite their own preference?
  • Are Coaches self-awareness of their
    behaviors?
• Qualitatively – need more, need to hear more
  from the athletes themselves
  • Theme Development
  • Triangulate data
Some Practical
          Suggestions
• Have a positive coaching style
• Give constructive feedback
• Tell them when they do something right
• Yelling at them usually doesn’t
  work…there is a continuum though
• Constant negative/punitive feedback
  will cause them to tune you out!
• Be fair and consistent
• Ask them questions instead of
  always pointing out their mistakes
  (esp. team sports)
• Know their expectations early
• Ask them what motivates them
• Ask how they want to be coached
Using video tape as
            feedback
• Know they are very critical of
  themselves
• They know what they did wrong
  (level)..again ask questions
• Only successful when used to point out
  positives or team results
• Show them examples of excellent
  performances instead
Encourage
• Praise them (notice them)
• Convince them of what they
  CAN do
• Sell them on themselves
• Be the salesperson that helps
  them perform up to their
  potential
Let them have a SAY
• Ask their opinion
• Use their Feedback!!
Pressure Situations

• Don’t individualize pressure
• Put the pressure on the team not the
  individual
• If she fails she let herself down, the
  coach, the team…and she's devastated
• Others think you are showing
  favoritism
Competition
• Females value effort, friendship, the
  teamwork, individual improvement and
  mutual gain
• Pitting them against teammates might
  not work…discuss separating personal
  feelings for teammates from
  competition
• Teach them to compartmentalize their
  lives and their feelings for teammates…
Practice
• They need to socialize before practice

• Let them talk and do social warm up drills

• Allow them to gossip during warm-up, stretching,
  setting up

• Don’t take it that they aren’t focused

• Explain what you expect from them today

• Have incentives to inspire working hard and being
  competitive

• They like and need competitive drills – don’t spend
  countless hours in skills practice
Chart Results
• Verbally appreciate all roles
• Post performance charts that grade
  effort, grades, heart, desire, honor roll,
  nails and glue, not individual stats
• Discuss individual stats privately
• Post team stats
Teach them to Forget
• They blame themselves and get down
  on themselves
• Coach should help raise self-esteem
  and get her to forgive herself for poor
  performance
• Coach should tell them why they are
  pulled from a game, or why they aren't
  getting PT
• Help them forget the negative by
  focusing on what is + (or even past +

More Related Content

What's hot

Group Work in Problem Gambling Settings
Group Work in Problem Gambling SettingsGroup Work in Problem Gambling Settings
Group Work in Problem Gambling Settingsactsconz
 
#Fit: Never Enough & the Meat Market - Are you still playing with the wrong i...
#Fit: Never Enough & the Meat Market - Are you still playing with the wrong i...#Fit: Never Enough & the Meat Market - Are you still playing with the wrong i...
#Fit: Never Enough & the Meat Market - Are you still playing with the wrong i...Nick Milodragovich
 
chak deIndia ppt (Organisational Behavior learning)
chak deIndia ppt (Organisational Behavior learning)chak deIndia ppt (Organisational Behavior learning)
chak deIndia ppt (Organisational Behavior learning)Ranjita Naik
 
SW611 Leaders Role in Change Group Presentation Part 2
SW611 Leaders Role in Change Group Presentation Part 2SW611 Leaders Role in Change Group Presentation Part 2
SW611 Leaders Role in Change Group Presentation Part 2Nathan Lizotte, LMSW-cc
 
What makes a leader? (week 2)
What makes a leader? (week 2)What makes a leader? (week 2)
What makes a leader? (week 2)klcullen-lester
 
Leadership & Followership
Leadership & FollowershipLeadership & Followership
Leadership & Followershipalivicky
 
Youth Leadership - PPT Presentation-1
Youth Leadership - PPT Presentation-1Youth Leadership - PPT Presentation-1
Youth Leadership - PPT Presentation-1Saif Choudhury
 
Discovering Your Authentic Leadership by Dr. Yasmin Davidds
Discovering Your Authentic Leadership by Dr. Yasmin DaviddsDiscovering Your Authentic Leadership by Dr. Yasmin Davidds
Discovering Your Authentic Leadership by Dr. Yasmin DaviddsYasmin Davidds
 
Chak de india – team work
Chak de india – team workChak de india – team work
Chak de india – team workAbdul Khan
 

What's hot (12)

Group Work in Problem Gambling Settings
Group Work in Problem Gambling SettingsGroup Work in Problem Gambling Settings
Group Work in Problem Gambling Settings
 
Dissertation Defense ppt 2014
Dissertation Defense ppt 2014Dissertation Defense ppt 2014
Dissertation Defense ppt 2014
 
#Fit: Never Enough & the Meat Market - Are you still playing with the wrong i...
#Fit: Never Enough & the Meat Market - Are you still playing with the wrong i...#Fit: Never Enough & the Meat Market - Are you still playing with the wrong i...
#Fit: Never Enough & the Meat Market - Are you still playing with the wrong i...
 
chak deIndia ppt (Organisational Behavior learning)
chak deIndia ppt (Organisational Behavior learning)chak deIndia ppt (Organisational Behavior learning)
chak deIndia ppt (Organisational Behavior learning)
 
SW611 Leaders Role in Change Group Presentation Part 2
SW611 Leaders Role in Change Group Presentation Part 2SW611 Leaders Role in Change Group Presentation Part 2
SW611 Leaders Role in Change Group Presentation Part 2
 
What makes a leader? (week 2)
What makes a leader? (week 2)What makes a leader? (week 2)
What makes a leader? (week 2)
 
Leadership & Followership
Leadership & FollowershipLeadership & Followership
Leadership & Followership
 
Followership, Gordon Curphy, PhD
Followership, Gordon Curphy, PhDFollowership, Gordon Curphy, PhD
Followership, Gordon Curphy, PhD
 
Youth Leadership - PPT Presentation-1
Youth Leadership - PPT Presentation-1Youth Leadership - PPT Presentation-1
Youth Leadership - PPT Presentation-1
 
Discovering Your Authentic Leadership by Dr. Yasmin Davidds
Discovering Your Authentic Leadership by Dr. Yasmin DaviddsDiscovering Your Authentic Leadership by Dr. Yasmin Davidds
Discovering Your Authentic Leadership by Dr. Yasmin Davidds
 
Followership
FollowershipFollowership
Followership
 
Chak de india – team work
Chak de india – team workChak de india – team work
Chak de india – team work
 

Viewers also liked

Coaching process inventory with likert scale
Coaching process inventory with likert scaleCoaching process inventory with likert scale
Coaching process inventory with likert scaleJonathan Sibley
 
Strengths Based Coaching V8 Linked In
Strengths Based Coaching V8 Linked InStrengths Based Coaching V8 Linked In
Strengths Based Coaching V8 Linked Ingee2004adam
 
Sport Psychology and Rowing Mental Fitness
Sport Psychology and Rowing Mental FitnessSport Psychology and Rowing Mental Fitness
Sport Psychology and Rowing Mental Fitness118620
 
Coaching adolescents- Sports Coaching Pedagogy- u3052227
Coaching adolescents- Sports Coaching Pedagogy- u3052227Coaching adolescents- Sports Coaching Pedagogy- u3052227
Coaching adolescents- Sports Coaching Pedagogy- u3052227Michael Mackenzie
 
Training and Coaching Agile Minds
Training and Coaching Agile MindsTraining and Coaching Agile Minds
Training and Coaching Agile MindsIlias Bartolini
 
7 Steps To Creating An Effective E Learning Program
7 Steps To Creating An Effective E Learning Program7 Steps To Creating An Effective E Learning Program
7 Steps To Creating An Effective E Learning ProgramThe Blockchain Academy
 

Viewers also liked (8)

Coaching process inventory with likert scale
Coaching process inventory with likert scaleCoaching process inventory with likert scale
Coaching process inventory with likert scale
 
Strengths Based Coaching V8 Linked In
Strengths Based Coaching V8 Linked InStrengths Based Coaching V8 Linked In
Strengths Based Coaching V8 Linked In
 
Sport Minds Coaches Workshop - LPP
Sport Minds Coaches Workshop - LPPSport Minds Coaches Workshop - LPP
Sport Minds Coaches Workshop - LPP
 
Sport Psychology and Rowing Mental Fitness
Sport Psychology and Rowing Mental FitnessSport Psychology and Rowing Mental Fitness
Sport Psychology and Rowing Mental Fitness
 
Coaching adolescents- Sports Coaching Pedagogy- u3052227
Coaching adolescents- Sports Coaching Pedagogy- u3052227Coaching adolescents- Sports Coaching Pedagogy- u3052227
Coaching adolescents- Sports Coaching Pedagogy- u3052227
 
Training and Coaching Agile Minds
Training and Coaching Agile MindsTraining and Coaching Agile Minds
Training and Coaching Agile Minds
 
7 Steps To Creating An Effective E Learning Program
7 Steps To Creating An Effective E Learning Program7 Steps To Creating An Effective E Learning Program
7 Steps To Creating An Effective E Learning Program
 
E learning ppt
E learning pptE learning ppt
E learning ppt
 

Similar to Gender of coaches

Pat Summit Powerpoint.pptx1
Pat Summit Powerpoint.pptx1Pat Summit Powerpoint.pptx1
Pat Summit Powerpoint.pptx1Cody Martinez
 
Pet 735 coach efficacy
Pet 735 coach efficacyPet 735 coach efficacy
Pet 735 coach efficacyajkeath
 
How to Attract and Recruit More Minority Coaches into NCAA Div. 1 Head Coachi...
How to Attract and Recruit More Minority Coaches into NCAA Div. 1 Head Coachi...How to Attract and Recruit More Minority Coaches into NCAA Div. 1 Head Coachi...
How to Attract and Recruit More Minority Coaches into NCAA Div. 1 Head Coachi...evanska
 
Pet 735 week 3 erickson
Pet 735 week 3 ericksonPet 735 week 3 erickson
Pet 735 week 3 ericksontjgoad
 
Final Presentation
Final PresentationFinal Presentation
Final PresentationTiye Davis
 
Athletes' beliefs about leadership in elite sport
Athletes' beliefs about leadership in elite sportAthletes' beliefs about leadership in elite sport
Athletes' beliefs about leadership in elite sportRichard Fryer
 
Mkda consultants final
Mkda consultants finalMkda consultants final
Mkda consultants finalMDKA
 
Bryon Martin - Athletes, Academics, Social Change
Bryon Martin - Athletes, Academics, Social ChangeBryon Martin - Athletes, Academics, Social Change
Bryon Martin - Athletes, Academics, Social Changealiathletesforum
 
Ethnographic Study on Confidence in Youth Sports
Ethnographic Study on Confidence in Youth SportsEthnographic Study on Confidence in Youth Sports
Ethnographic Study on Confidence in Youth SportsAlexandra Wheatley
 
Maidan summit 2012 Dr. Ravi Verma-Parivartan ICRW
Maidan summit 2012 Dr. Ravi Verma-Parivartan ICRWMaidan summit 2012 Dr. Ravi Verma-Parivartan ICRW
Maidan summit 2012 Dr. Ravi Verma-Parivartan ICRWMaidan.in
 
Understanding sport coaching
Understanding sport coachingUnderstanding sport coaching
Understanding sport coachingStaceyFleming01
 
Conducting research that counts dr.gould
Conducting research that counts dr.gouldConducting research that counts dr.gould
Conducting research that counts dr.gouldYinglingV
 
Coaching for Character and SportsmanshipA coachs character is o
Coaching for Character and SportsmanshipA coachs character is oCoaching for Character and SportsmanshipA coachs character is o
Coaching for Character and SportsmanshipA coachs character is oWilheminaRossi174
 
Rodansky athletes social change
Rodansky athletes social changeRodansky athletes social change
Rodansky athletes social changealiathletesforum
 
LEADERSHIP.pptx mscanscasjncasncnaascanscnsa
LEADERSHIP.pptx mscanscasjncasncnaascanscnsaLEADERSHIP.pptx mscanscasjncasncnaascanscnsa
LEADERSHIP.pptx mscanscasjncasncnaascanscnsaArriene Chris Diongson
 

Similar to Gender of coaches (20)

Pat Summit Powerpoint.pptx1
Pat Summit Powerpoint.pptx1Pat Summit Powerpoint.pptx1
Pat Summit Powerpoint.pptx1
 
Pet 735 coach efficacy
Pet 735 coach efficacyPet 735 coach efficacy
Pet 735 coach efficacy
 
presentation
presentationpresentation
presentation
 
FW279 Leadership
FW279 LeadershipFW279 Leadership
FW279 Leadership
 
Ch. 9 leadership
Ch. 9 leadershipCh. 9 leadership
Ch. 9 leadership
 
How to Attract and Recruit More Minority Coaches into NCAA Div. 1 Head Coachi...
How to Attract and Recruit More Minority Coaches into NCAA Div. 1 Head Coachi...How to Attract and Recruit More Minority Coaches into NCAA Div. 1 Head Coachi...
How to Attract and Recruit More Minority Coaches into NCAA Div. 1 Head Coachi...
 
Pet 735 week 3 erickson
Pet 735 week 3 ericksonPet 735 week 3 erickson
Pet 735 week 3 erickson
 
Final Presentation
Final PresentationFinal Presentation
Final Presentation
 
SCP Feedback
SCP FeedbackSCP Feedback
SCP Feedback
 
Athletes' beliefs about leadership in elite sport
Athletes' beliefs about leadership in elite sportAthletes' beliefs about leadership in elite sport
Athletes' beliefs about leadership in elite sport
 
Mkda consultants final
Mkda consultants finalMkda consultants final
Mkda consultants final
 
Bryon Martin - Athletes, Academics, Social Change
Bryon Martin - Athletes, Academics, Social ChangeBryon Martin - Athletes, Academics, Social Change
Bryon Martin - Athletes, Academics, Social Change
 
Ethnographic Study on Confidence in Youth Sports
Ethnographic Study on Confidence in Youth SportsEthnographic Study on Confidence in Youth Sports
Ethnographic Study on Confidence in Youth Sports
 
Maidan summit 2012 Dr. Ravi Verma-Parivartan ICRW
Maidan summit 2012 Dr. Ravi Verma-Parivartan ICRWMaidan summit 2012 Dr. Ravi Verma-Parivartan ICRW
Maidan summit 2012 Dr. Ravi Verma-Parivartan ICRW
 
Understanding sport coaching
Understanding sport coachingUnderstanding sport coaching
Understanding sport coaching
 
Dissertation proposal defense
Dissertation proposal defenseDissertation proposal defense
Dissertation proposal defense
 
Conducting research that counts dr.gould
Conducting research that counts dr.gouldConducting research that counts dr.gould
Conducting research that counts dr.gould
 
Coaching for Character and SportsmanshipA coachs character is o
Coaching for Character and SportsmanshipA coachs character is oCoaching for Character and SportsmanshipA coachs character is o
Coaching for Character and SportsmanshipA coachs character is o
 
Rodansky athletes social change
Rodansky athletes social changeRodansky athletes social change
Rodansky athletes social change
 
LEADERSHIP.pptx mscanscasjncasncnaascanscnsa
LEADERSHIP.pptx mscanscasjncasncnaascanscnsaLEADERSHIP.pptx mscanscasjncasncnaascanscnsa
LEADERSHIP.pptx mscanscasjncasncnaascanscnsa
 

Recently uploaded

PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptxPGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptxaleonardes
 
Resultados 20 KMS "Podebrady" Walking 2024
Resultados 20 KMS "Podebrady" Walking 2024Resultados 20 KMS "Podebrady" Walking 2024
Resultados 20 KMS "Podebrady" Walking 2024Judith Chuquipul
 
20240408 Bending Backwards to the Second Step Up.docx
20240408 Bending Backwards to the Second Step Up.docx20240408 Bending Backwards to the Second Step Up.docx
20240408 Bending Backwards to the Second Step Up.docxSharon Liu
 
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptxBenifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptxsherrymieg19
 
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptxBADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptxvillenoc6
 
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWEProject & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWEDeShawn Ellis
 
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdfClash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdfMuhammad Hashim
 
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024DONAL88 GACOR
 
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docxJORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docxArturo Pacheco Alvarez
 

Recently uploaded (9)

PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptxPGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
 
Resultados 20 KMS "Podebrady" Walking 2024
Resultados 20 KMS "Podebrady" Walking 2024Resultados 20 KMS "Podebrady" Walking 2024
Resultados 20 KMS "Podebrady" Walking 2024
 
20240408 Bending Backwards to the Second Step Up.docx
20240408 Bending Backwards to the Second Step Up.docx20240408 Bending Backwards to the Second Step Up.docx
20240408 Bending Backwards to the Second Step Up.docx
 
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptxBenifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
 
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptxBADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
 
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWEProject & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
 
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdfClash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
 
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
 
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docxJORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
 

Gender of coaches

  • 1. Exploring female athletes motives for participation: Does the gender of the coach really matter? Stefanie A. Latham, Ph.D. Oklahoma City University slatham@okcu.edu
  • 2. Introduction • Title IX and increasing numbers of female athletes • Only 41.4% of women’s teams (and less than 2% of men’s teams) were led by a female head coach — the lowest level of representation ever, down from more than 90% when Title IX was enacted. (Acosta & Carpenter, 2009).
  • 3. Percentage of Women's Teams Coached by Females 100.0% 90% PLUS 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 58% 60.0% 54% 47% 46% 44% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 1972 1978 1984 1990 2000 2002 Acosta & Carpenter, 2002
  • 4. Increasing Female Sport Participation Continues Since 1975 there has been an 875% increase in female high school athletic participation 435% increase in college (including, all 4-year, post-high school, and 2-year institutions)
  • 5. Quote from latest research data • You know how girls can hate their female coach, but they probably wouldn't ever hate their guy coach like they would their girl coach? He could be as rude as hell and we'll be like, "it's just his personality", but if it’s a girl coach we're like, "Oh she has something against me or she hates me"…Like male coaches can be really rude and mean and we can get over it, but when female coaches are that way, you pretty much just think they are [assholes], and you can’t get over that… My AAU coach [who was male] was kind of like my high school coach was, like I described earlier, but everyone still thought he was a good coach. But my female high school coach who had the same personality, no one thought she was a good coach. They both knew the game really well and knew the skills and stuff and they both had kind of the same personality, but my guy coach was still thought of as being a good coach, I guess we just didn't take his crap so personally. (Michelle)
  • 6. Problem • Gender bias toward female coaches????? • Hiring practices of athletic directors is well documented • Athletes’ perceptions of their coaches behaviors and gender preferences for coach not explored very well
  • 7. True or False? ―Female coaches aren't winning championships. This proves that male coaches are better.‖ "Women are less intense. They aren't as demanding of their players. They aren't strong enough." ―Women turn other women off. It's easier to take coaching from a man.‖ ―You don't have to worry about the coach being a lesbian when you have a male coach.‖
  • 8. Brief Review of the Literature • Williams and Parkhouse (1986) • High school basketball players • Asked to indicate their preference between a hypothetical male or female coach who was classified as either successful or unsuccessful • Overall, 89% of male athletes and 71% of female athletes preferred a male coach despite success rate….WHAT??? • Rated males as more knowledgeable, more likely to achieve future success, more desirable to play for, and having a greater ability to motivate.
  • 9. Lit Review • Weinberg, Reveles, and Jackson (1994) • examined both male and female basketball players from JH, HS, and College • Asked to indicate their attitudes and feelings towards hypothetical male and female coaches • Both M & F exhibited more negative attitudes towards female coaches than male coaches • ranked female coaches as superior in coaching qualities of relating well to others and understanding athletes' feelings (two
  • 10. Lit Review • Medwechuk and Crossman (1994) • Male and Female Swimmers preferred male coaches • Both rated hypothetical male coaches with better abilities to motivate and more knowledgeable than hypo female coaches regardless success status (W/L record)
  • 11. Problem • Old Data… • Quantitative statistical analyses - Not clear • Used hypo scenarios only • Specific Behaviors not identified • Not very many sports (basketball mainly) • Differences bt. Team and individual sports not investigated • No voice given to athletes
  • 12. Some Hope • CBQ, Martin and Barnes (1999) • Demographic section = athlete’s age, gender, race, educational level, sport most played, years of participation, and asks preferences of the gender and age of the coach • Coaching behaviors section – 12 behavioral categories • R&V missing and or still being investigated
  • 13. Coaching Behaviors Questionnaire • Coaching behaviors that occur in practice or games • Reinforcement • Non-reinforcement • Mistake contingent encouragement • Mistake contingent technical instruction • Punishment • Punitive technical instruction • Ignoring mistakes • Keeping control • General technical instruction • General encouragement • Organization • General communication
  • 14. Little-Lit Review • Individual Sport athletes prefer training and instruction more than Team sport athletes • Males prefer more autocratic behavior than females • Females prefer democratic behaviors of coaches –participative in decisions pertaining to goals, methods, and strategies, but not studied very much…female voice is scarce.
  • 15. Problem continues • CBQ is new and hasn’t been used much • Kravig (2003) quant found female athletes to prefer different coaching behaviors than male athletes particularly regarding general encouragement and communication and females didn’t like to be punished • Preference of gender of the coach not indicated
  • 16. Purpose • The purpose of my present study is to mix both research methodologies to: • Quantitatively investigate preferred & actual coaching behaviors preferences of collegiate athletes AND whether coaching behaviors differ as a function of the gender of the coach • Sub-questions= type of sport (coactive, interactive, mixed) & level of collegiate play (JUCO, NAIA, NCAA I & II) • Qualitatively obtain a first-person perspective of the females athlete’s experiences of playing for a male vs. female coach AND hear in the words of the athletes themselves the preferred coaching behaviors
  • 17. Participants • So far…. 298 collegiate female athletes - Caucasian (n=168), African-American (n= 95) Hispanic (n=22), Asian (n=13);18-25 years of age (M = 20.7; s = 2.2); 164 NAIA; 134 NCAA D2 • 60 Coactive sports - golf (n=37) and wrestling (n=23) (yes we have female wrestling!!); • 81 Mixed sports - softball (n=55), track and field (n=36); • 157 Interactive sports- basketball (n=53), soccer (n=46), volleyball (n =58).
  • 18. Instruments • CBQ (R & V) and Interview Guide = • What sport do you play • When were you coached by a male and a female • How many years were you coached by the male and female coach • Which coach did you prefer the most and why • If you had daughters whom would you want them to be coached by? Why? • Differences/similarities bt. male and female coaches in: • Training practices and evaluation of performance • Encouragement/motivation • Helping with personal problem and enjoyment • Coaching methods • Feedback after mistakes and correcting behaviors • In general, what are your thoughts about males and females coaching female athletes
  • 19. Prelim Quant Results • Means scores on the subscales of the CBQ = DV, gender of coach and type of sport = IVs • 2 X 3 (Gender of coach X Sport Type) MANOVA used to determine if differences exist as of function of the gender of the coach and sport type • Alpha level .01 to decrease error • Follow-up discriminant function analyses and univariate ANOVAs used to id which coaching behaviors maximized differences among the groups
  • 20. Quant Results Actual • MANOVA produced significant multivariate main effect for the gender of the coach • F(12, 260) = 4.62, p = .0001, eta 2 = .18 • Discriminant analyses reveal • Punishment and Keeping Control were not significant • Female coaches were rated higher in Reinforcement, Mistake contingent Encouragement, General Encouragement and General Communication….hummm • Male coaches rated higher in Organization, Punitive Technical Instruction, and MCT Instruction…hummm
  • 21. Quant results Type of Sport Preferences • MANOVA revealed a significant multivariate main effect for type of sport • Follow-ups analyses indicated that: • Interactive sports preferred reinforcement, punishment, mistake contingent encouragement, general encouragement, general communication, and ignoring mistakes more than coactive and mixed sports • Coactive sports preferred non-reinforcement, mistake contingent technical instruction, and GT Instruction more than interactive and mixed • Mixed sports resembled interactive, but to lesser extent
  • 22. Qual Results • 11 interviews so far….. • All NAIA, 5 African-Americans, 4 Caucasian, 1 Asian • Basketball (2), Soccer (1), Volleyball (1), • Golf (2), Wrestling (1 who had actually had a female coach….hummm), • Softball (2), Track and Field (2). • These have been transcribed: themes not coded yet but discussion of possibilities are on sticky notes everywhere!!!!!!
  • 23. Interesting quotes ―He was much more together, he knew structure. He knew exactly where we needed to be, what time we needed to start‖ ―My male coach would sit down before a game and write down every possible thing the other team could do to beat us; and then write down next to it exactly what we could do to defend them‖ Referring to her male coach ―drills in practice always had a purpose and were very organized‖ ―expected more‖ ―no excuses‖
  • 24. ―With my female coach, she had different stuff everyday. We never knew what to expect out of her mood and it would take her 10 minutes to explain what we’re supposed to do in a drill and then it wouldn’t work well…so we’d just look at each other like…what the heck, she doesn’t know what's going on‖ ―She never kept score, or held us to a time limit. We always knew we weren’t going to be really disciplined and whatever rules were in place didn’t apply to her favorites‖
  • 25. • ―My female coaches, I always had more fun with ya know, like they always knew how to relate to us…but then again I think that made it harder to swallow when she got on to us for stuff‖ • ―In general, girl coaches are gonna be better at encouraging and motivating just because females are more encouraging than males‖ • ―With my male coaches its all about the X's and O’s. There was no bond. If something was personally bothering me my female coach would pick up on it and sympathize or at least ask what's wrong. My male coach would just punish us for lack of effort and didn’t care about our
  • 26. Preference for the Gender of the coach • All interviewees prefer a male coach overall • More knowledge • More challenging • Demand more respect • Possible themes • Discipline and Structure • Personal Relationships • Passivity and Aggressiveness
  • 27. Conclusions for now… • Quantitatively just scratching the surface (more balance in type of sport), level of collegiate play not done yet • Can/Will coaches learn to effectively integrate and blend autocratic and democratic styles despite their own preference? • Are Coaches self-awareness of their behaviors? • Qualitatively – need more, need to hear more from the athletes themselves • Theme Development • Triangulate data
  • 28. Some Practical Suggestions • Have a positive coaching style • Give constructive feedback • Tell them when they do something right • Yelling at them usually doesn’t work…there is a continuum though • Constant negative/punitive feedback will cause them to tune you out! • Be fair and consistent
  • 29. • Ask them questions instead of always pointing out their mistakes (esp. team sports) • Know their expectations early • Ask them what motivates them • Ask how they want to be coached
  • 30. Using video tape as feedback • Know they are very critical of themselves • They know what they did wrong (level)..again ask questions • Only successful when used to point out positives or team results • Show them examples of excellent performances instead
  • 31. Encourage • Praise them (notice them) • Convince them of what they CAN do • Sell them on themselves • Be the salesperson that helps them perform up to their potential
  • 32. Let them have a SAY • Ask their opinion • Use their Feedback!!
  • 33. Pressure Situations • Don’t individualize pressure • Put the pressure on the team not the individual • If she fails she let herself down, the coach, the team…and she's devastated • Others think you are showing favoritism
  • 34. Competition • Females value effort, friendship, the teamwork, individual improvement and mutual gain • Pitting them against teammates might not work…discuss separating personal feelings for teammates from competition • Teach them to compartmentalize their lives and their feelings for teammates…
  • 35. Practice • They need to socialize before practice • Let them talk and do social warm up drills • Allow them to gossip during warm-up, stretching, setting up • Don’t take it that they aren’t focused • Explain what you expect from them today • Have incentives to inspire working hard and being competitive • They like and need competitive drills – don’t spend countless hours in skills practice
  • 36. Chart Results • Verbally appreciate all roles • Post performance charts that grade effort, grades, heart, desire, honor roll, nails and glue, not individual stats • Discuss individual stats privately • Post team stats
  • 37. Teach them to Forget • They blame themselves and get down on themselves • Coach should help raise self-esteem and get her to forgive herself for poor performance • Coach should tell them why they are pulled from a game, or why they aren't getting PT • Help them forget the negative by focusing on what is + (or even past +