1) Participants found the program especially valuable for developing new relationships in their sector and learning more effective collaboration. It supported personal leadership development and learning techniques to have greater impact.
2) Participants used tools like difficult conversations and personal reflection to become more effective leaders and improve their work-life balance.
3) The program helped many participants transition to new jobs or create new organizations and positions to have more influence in their sector.
2. Contents
Key Insights
Methodology
Participant Overview
Value and Benefits of Rockwood Fellowship Program
Rockwood Impact Stories
Participant Generated Recommendations
2
3. Key Insights
The Rockwood Fellowship Model encouraged and
supported participants to develop their personal
leadership, sustain themselves in their jobs, and learn and
practice leadership techniques for greater influence and
impact in their sector.
Participants found the Program especially valuable in
supporting them to develop new relationships in their
sector and learn more effective collaboration.
Participants highly valued the opportunity to expand
their collaborations and partnerships with others in their
cohort.
3
4. Key Insights
Participants indicated that the Program was unique
because it was focused on relationships and learning,
and took a holistic, strategic, sustained approach to
developing leadership.
Participants used the tools and practices they learned to
become more effective leaders.
The majority of the fellows saw improvements in their
sector’s capacity to work together around a shared
policy or movement agenda.
4
7. Survey Respondents
83%
Work in the nonprofit
sector
78%
Continue to work in
their
sector/community/
movement
43%
Have changed
organizations
Most are 31 -50
years old (with
most in the 31-40
range)
2/3 are female
8% are
transgender
Slightly under half
are people of
color
7
60 Survey Respondents
LGBTQ -- 22 responses (37% response)
Media -- 21 responses (22% response)
HRNSR -- 17 responses (39% response)
8. Years in the Field Prior to Participation
8
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
More than 15
10-15 years
8-10 years
4-7 years
Less than 3 years
Years in Sector
LGBTQ
Media
HR
Source: Rockwood Evaluation Survey
9. Focus Group and Interview
Participants
LGBTQ
• Mija (2010)
• Jorge Cestou
(2010)
• Kylar Broaddus
(2010)
• Jeff Graham
(2010)
• Lee Badget (2008)
• Nadine Smith
(2008)
Media
• Brooke Rae
Hunter (2011)
• Nathaniel James
(2008)
• Aliza Dichter
(2006)
• Jenny Toomey
(2006)
HRNSR
• Sameera Hafiz
(2011)
• Nusrat Choudhury
(2011)
• Talat Hamdani
(2011)
• Michelle
Richardson (2010)
• Cindy Cohn
(2010)
9
11. 11
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Personally
Organizationally
Sector
Extremely/Very
Overall Value of the Rockwood
Fellowship
Source: Rockwood Evaluation Survey
12. 12
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Personally
Organizationally
Sector
Extremely/Very
Value of Rockwood - By Program
Media
LGBTQ
HRNSR
Source: Rockwood Evaluation Survey
13. 13
50%
65%
65%
82%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Environment for difficult
conversations
Supports for relationship
building
Tools to collaborate
Tools to be effective leader
Extremely/Very
Most Effective Benefits of Fellowship
Source: Rockwood Evaluation Survey
14. Source: Rockwood Evaluation Survey
35%
35%
50%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Supports for relationship
building
Tools to collaborate
Environment for difficult
conversations
Somewhat Well/Not Very Well
Least Effective Benefits of Fellowship
15. 15
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Listserv
Practice Calls
Peer Coaching
Advanced Retreats
Professional Coaching
Cohort Composition
360 Degree Feedback
Art of Leadership
Extremely/Very Valuable
Value of Program Components
Source: Rockwood Evaluation Survey
Note: This chart includes the N/A responses
16. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Listserv
Practice Calls
Peer Coaching
Professional Coaching
Cohort Composition
Advanced Retreats
360 Degree Feedback
Art of Leadership
Value of Program Components
Percent
(Extremely/Very)
Source: Rockwood Evaluation Survey
Note: This chart does not include the N/A responses
17. The Rockwood Fellowship was simply put the best
leadership training I've gone to. It taught proven
techniques, communicated them in an easily
understandable manner, and did so through trainers who
embodied the highest principles of social
justice, empathy, and kindness as well as skill. The trainers
modeled the lessons they taught, which was both effective
and inspiring.
(Human Rights and National Security Reform Cohort)
Unique about Rockwood
17
19. Leadership
self-
awareness
19
My few days in the program were the first time that I
had been challenged to see my own leadership
through the eyes of others, to come to terms with
how I needed to grow in order to project myself in
the way that I need to.
(Media Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
20. 20
Participatory
Space for participants to co-develop topics and
agenda to address specific field issues. Attention
to the specific dynamics of our field collectively, in
addition to individual leadership growth.
(Media Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
21. Network/
Relationship
building
21
It allowed me to work with and get to know cohorts that
work in the same field as I do but are around the
country. This allowed me to form different relationships
and partnerships over a shorter period of time. I know
some I would not have formed at all without the
Rockwood experience.
(LGBTQ Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
22. Focused on
the person
first
22
Focused on person first, field next, organizations last.
Usually it's the opposite.
(Media Cohort)
It is very focused on the self and your responsibility
towards yourself and how that translates to your
interactions with your community.
(Human Rights and National Security Reform Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
23. Environment
of learning
and trust
23
Building strong, deep ties and relationships with other
folks in one’s field. Creating an environment of
learning, trust and confidentiality that really allows one
to go deeper than any other training into one's own
leadership strengths and challenges.
(Human Rights and National Security Reform Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
24. Comprehensive
approach
24
My other trainings were skill-specific (especially
strategic communications). Rockwood's approach
can enhance the leadership capacity of individuals
by addressing their needs and strengths
holistically, from the physical/biological to the
psychological and social system level.
(Media Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
25. Top Tools & Processes MOST Used Post
Rockwood
Personal
Resourcefulness
(49)
Difficult
Conversations
(45)
Personal Purpose
Work (44)
Organization
Giving/Receiving
Feedback (44)
Difficult
Conversations
(37)
Storytelling (29)
Sector
Storytelling (25)
Resourcefulness
(24)
Difficult
Conversations
(23)
25Source: Rockwood Evaluation Survey
26. Top Tools & Processes LEAST Used Post
Rockwood
26
Personal
Storytelling
(29)
Peer
coaching
(24)
Collaborative
conversations
(18)
Organization
Personal
purpose work
(20)
Peer
coaching
(18)
Personal
ecology work
(11)
Sector
Personal
visioning (12)
360
assessment
(7)
Personal
ecology work
(4)
Source: Rockwood Evaluation Survey
28. Job Changes
28
42% of participants reported job changes
Note: The Other category includes becoming a Consultant, Board Member, or Program
Officer, for example
Source: Rockwood Evaluation Survey
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
No change
Other
Promoted
Job Changes
29. Rockwood Effects on Job Changes
Rockwood helped me clarify how I could be most useful
to the sector and that I needed an organizational
change for health/balance reasons.
(Media Cohort)
29
30. Effects on
Job/Career
Transitioned to a new
position/organization
Created new
organizations
Created new
position
Enhanced quality and
effectiveness of the
workplace
Provided tools for
setting career
direction
30Based on qualitative data from survey
31. Transitioned to a
new
position/organizat
ion
31
I realized I needed to be working on important
things in important ways and at my old job I no
longer was doing that. It was incredibly helpful to
be at Rockwood to focus my purpose and
passion, and prepare for how to leave my old job.
(Media Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
32. Created new
organizations
32
I created an organization while at Rockwood which I
am the CEO/ED now, Trans People of Color Coalition
(TPOCC) and am still on the board of directors at the
National Black Justice Coalition. I was on the board
of NBJC at the time of Rockwood.
(LGBTQ Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
33. Created new
position
33
I created my new position and job description in
order to be more effective with my work. As
Community Development Manager, I have more
influence in the decision making process and
direction of my organization. I am able to create
more networking, partnerships and community
building opportunities with media and technology.
(Media Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
34. Enhanced quality
and effectiveness
at the workplace
34
After the fellowship was over, I worked on a coalition
letter with the DC policy office. I felt very comfortable
picking up the phone, sharing my personal
views, having a very collaborative conversation. We
have very different ways of viewing problems, but we
trusted each other professionally. Having a personal
relationship really helped. I noticed a difference in
how we worked together before Rockwood and how
we worked together after Rockwood.
{HRNSR Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
35. Provided tools for
setting career
direction
35
Gave me tools for self direction and autonomy. (Media
Cohort)
Helped me think about my personal goals and career
path. (Media Cohort)
The Rockwood training gave me the courage to work
independently of any organization. (Human Rights Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
36. 36
Note: This question refers to peer connections that emerged as a result of the fellowship
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Other
Peer Coaching
Provided Personal Support
Exchanged Resources
Collaborated with People
Maintained Friendships
Peer Connections
Source: Rockwood Evaluation Survey
38. Serve together on
boards
38
A number of the fellows in my cohort are now on the
same board of directors. I've found it extremely
valuable to have a deeper relationship with these
individuals and to have a common language and
approach towards the work and solving the challenges.
(LGBTQ Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
39. Provide support
and share
resources
39
The relationships I built with the other two women in my
cohort have been so valuable. We spoke on a regular
basis for several months after Rockwood and have
developed unique relationship with each other that
allow us to work through both personal and professional
challenges as well as share resources for success in our
day to day work.
(Media Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
40. Work on
projects/coalition
s together
40
We launched the Knowledge Exchange Project
with Consumers Union to extend the
collaborative process of the Media Reform and
Justice Sector.
(Media Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
42. Kylar Broadus, LGBTQ 2010
Founded Trans People of Color Coalition (TPOCC)
Make visible and engage trans people in advocacy efforts
Develop a trans network to respond to hate crimes and murders around the
country
First transgender person to testify before the U.S. Senate
TPOCC was an idea I had that I had not taken the time out to make a
reality. I’m practical minded so when we needed a project I thought I can
launch this now. It was certainly a catalyst for me doing that. I thought
okay, I have the space and time, so let’s try this and see how it works.
Rockwood creates this bond that is much deeper. I can say that these are
my true friends/colleagues because I have gotten to know them deep
down.
42
43. Nusrat J. Choudhury, HRNSR 2011
ACLU and the Brennan Center are engaged with community-
based organizations AAANY (Arab American Association of New
York) and DRUM (Desis Rising Up and Moving) to collaborate on
advocacy and explore possibilities for litigation.
The Rockwood Fellowship was a career-changing experience. I now
have very close relationships with people from partner advocacy
groups and community-based organizations whom I didn’t know
before. We are now close colleagues and friends, and come to our
shared work from a place of deep mutual respect and
understanding. Our trust in each other and willingness to go the
extra mile has made our work together more collaborative and
effective. Together, we have also helped foster more effective
coalition meetings involving other leaders and groups.
43
44. Jenny Toomey, Media 2006
Participated in the 1st year of the Fellowship as director of the Future
of Music Coalition
Later became a Senior Program Officer at the Ford
Foundation, which funded the Media, Communications and
Information Policy Fellowship
Identifies the Rockwood Fellowship as catalyzing the Knowledge
Exchange, a grassroots and inside the beltway collaboration that
sets a common agenda around media justice policy
The Knowledge Exchange is 40 media policy and media justice
leaders coming to Washington for three days each year for the last
five years… It is an important collaboration between grassroots and
inside the beltway organizers that has led to significant outcomes.
44
46. 46
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Healthy Work-life Balance
Have Difficult Conversations
Manage my Triggers
Feel less Isolated
Be Mindful
Collaborate Across Race
Own my Personal Power
Be Authentic
Develop Relationships across Power
Take Leadership Risks
Exchange Support
Build Trusting Relationships
Collaborate across Geography
Effectiveness: Personal Level
Percent (Extremely/Very)
Source: Rockwood Evaluation Survey
47. 47Source: Rockwood Evaluation Survey
37%
32%
23%
6%
2%
Contribution: Personal Level
Very significant
contribution
Significant
contribution
Some contribution
No answer
Little or no
contribution
48. Contributions at the Personal Level
I am now able to claim an independent strategic analysis
and voice and operationalize big ideas that are well ahead
of the status quo in social change work. This doesn't always
make me popular, but it earns respect and lets me identify
authentic collaborative partners within and outside of
formal organizational structures.
(Media Cohort)
48
50. Effective
communication
50
Rockwood helped me develop my leadership style
to be more open and interactive with people both
laterally and below me in the organization.
(Human Rights Cohort)
I have learned the art of difficult conversations and
how to converse without being blunt or rude and be
effective also.
(Human Rights Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
51. Space to reflect
51
I think Rockwood help to renewed my spirit and propel me
to create an organization to create change.
(LGBTQ Cohort)
I finished Rockwood two years ago and my boss STILL talks
about it. I've gotten complements from coworkers too. I
just can't credit the program enough with finally giving me
space to do the work I needed to do.
(Human Rights and National Security Reform Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
52. Open to
feedback
52
Rockwood shifted my relationship to critical feedback. I
learned to really hear the feedback as something to
grow and learn from--as a gift, and not to take it
personally. As a result, I seek feedback and critique so
that I can continue to grow as a leader and strengthen
my organization. It was a huge shift for me.
(Media Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
53. Advocate for
myself
53
I am now a stronger advocate for myself, current
organization and the larger progressive
movement overall from my participation in
Rockwood!
(LGBTQ Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
54. Work/life balance
54
The Rockwood Fellowship has contributed significantly to
my own personal leadership style. I embrace my
power, my role as a leader and who I am as a person and
can now weave those things together in a way that
makes me a stronger leader that can balance work and
life in a way I wasn't doing so before.
(Media Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
55. Connections
55
It presented options in approaching leadership and
organizing challenges. It connected me to people I
respect, could learn from and see in action.
(Media Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
56. Perspective
about sector
56
The 360 degree evaluation, the Vision Stands, and
other similar tools have helped me understand my
larger role within my sector, and play that position
more effectively and strategically, particularly in
supporting collaboration between beltway and
regional groups, or with funders.
(Media Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
58. 58
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Overcome Tendency towards Isolation
Have Difficult Conversations
Engage in Reflective Learning
Act with Trust and Transparency
Address Disparity of Resources
Address Disparity of Power
Focus on Results
Cross-sector Collaborations
Promote Emerging Leaders
Help Each Other with Challenges
Organize/mobilize Constituencies
Create Long-term Partnerships
Work Across National and Local…
Influence Policy
Effectiveness: Sector
Percent
(Extremely/Very)
Source: Rockwood Evaluation Survey
60. 60Source: Rockwood Evaluation Survey
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
LGBTQ
Media
HRNSR
Contribution of Rockwood to
Strengthening Sector
(By Program)
Percent
(Significant/Very)
61. Contributions at the Sector Level
It has been very helpful to increase the capacity of the field's
leaders and to provide some shared language/shared
experience. And gathering people from our sector together
is always helpful in building relationships just by virtue of
sharing space and place.
(Media Cohort)
61
63. Cross-org ties
63
By fostering meaningful relationships between
people from different organizations, the Rockwood
Fellowship has helped to break down some of the
barriers that exist between organizations simply
because people don't know each other. I am more
trusting of other organizations where my fellowship
peers work, and I know that I can pick up the
phone to call my fellowship peer to find out what is
going on or why that organization took a position
that is contrary to our own.
(Human Rights and National Security Reform
Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
64. Shared purpose
and language
64
Rockwood was able to pull together individuals from
national and local organizations and get us all in the
same room for the shared purpose of strengthening
our movement. Some of the real and perceived
barriers to having authentic conversations with our
colleagues in the room were alleviated at times.
(Media Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
65. Talk about power
65
It is my understanding that the first time community
based organizations had an opportunity to have
"difficult conversations" about
resources, power, racial justice, etc., with other
sectors (policy folks, legal advocates) in the NSHR
realm was at Rockwood. That was
important, because the conversations have
continued, albeit very slow.
(Humans Right Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
67. “Because of the baggage between organizations that we
brought into the room, it took our facilitators a lot more work
to create a container... If my cohort was not the only one
challenged with this, I would recommend that more time be
spent on creating a safe container.”
(LGBTQ Cohort)
67
69. Check
assumptions
69
I'm not as big a fan of the spirituality aspect of
the trainings as others may have been, so I think
it's important that you don't just make an
assumption that everyone is going to appreciate
that component.
(Human Rights and National Security Reform
Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
70. Improve peer
coaching model
70
I found that neither of my peer coaches were really
interested in the assignment - not sure why. Perhaps it
could be voluntary, or people could be matched
based on their enthusiasm for the program!
(Human Rights Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
71. Engage and map
the field
71
The fellowship could have done more to talk with the
field's leaders to understand specifically which training
modules and which conversations were most needed. It
may also have been helpful to acknowledge the vast
differences in capacity among the organizations and
leaders in the field. Rockwood could have also been
helpful in giving the field a framework for understanding
the importance of all the different strategies that
different groups were using, and how the groups in the
field could best own their particular role while respecting
and complementing the work of others.
(Media Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
72. Create space to
discuss power
72
I think Rockwood can't expect power dynamics of a
movement not to play out in their trainings. And while I
know Rockwood worked to create a safe space, I knew
that anything I said or did in front of my peers in that
room, was being fed back to people outside of the
room. I actually felt my best training was the Art of
Leadership where I got to meet and work with people
from other sectors. By the time I got to the final training in
April of 2011, I felt less safe to truly express myself.
(Media Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
73. Focus on sector
leadership
development
73
“This is a worthwhile process, but one that needs development to
be more useful in the long-term to sectors. Sectors require shared
vision, the capacity for collaboration, the tools for mapping and
evaluation, and developed mature leaders with a clear sense of
their own strengths and vision. A program that supported in these
ways would be highly effective.”
(Media Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
74. Enhance follow-
up activities and
supports
74
Fellows need ongoing support and frameworks for
returning to the "Rockwood" space on an as-needed
basis. Old patterns and weaknesses in the way
cohorts relate to each other settle back in after a
short period of years. (Media Cohort)
Post fellowship engagement and follow up is the most
challenging and glaring weakness of program to
ensure what is learned from fellowship is integrated
into our personal leadership and to build stronger
community sector overall. (LGBTQ Cohort)
Based on qualitative data from survey
UPDATE 11/13/12: Updated info [Natalia]Garlin Gilchrist (2011 Media) registered for second focus group but did not participate
UPDATE 11/12/12: Updated chart based on latest charts [Natalia] DONE 11/13/12Over 90% of survey respondents indicated that Rockwood was extremely or very valuable for them personally; Sector and organization value were also valuable (over 60%) but significantly less than personal value.
UPDATE 11/12/12: Updated chart based on latest charts [Natalia] DONE 11/13/12Participants in the three fellowship programs valued the program differently. For instance, the media cohort was close to twice as likely to say that the fellowship had high value for their sector compared with HRNSR. All reported high value personally.
UPDATE 11/12/12: Updated chart based on latest charts [Natalia] DONE 11/13/12
UPDATE 11/12/12: Updated chart based on latest charts [Natalia] DONE 11/13/12
UPDATE 11/12/12: Updated chart based on latest charts [Natalia]. This chart includes the N/A responses. DONE 11/13/12Peer coaching was somewhat hit or miss for participants. When it clicked and worked well it has been of considerable value…quote NusratPractice calls were not used by every program nor was coaching so ratings of value may be skewed. [Do we have data on how many N/As there were in each category? Are these calculated in the percentages? The listserv is not highly valued by respondents. Reconsider the listserv
UPDATE 11/13/12: This chart does not include the N/A responses (Natalia). DONE 11/13/12
Unique About Rockwood (Question 16)Focused on person first, field next, org last. Usually it's the opposite. (Media Cohort)My few days in the program were the first time that I had been challenged to see my own leadership through the eyes of others, to come to terms with how I needed to grow in order to project myself in the way that I need to.“ (Media Cohort)Building strong, deep ties and relationships with other folks in ones field. Creating an environment of learning, trust and confidentiality that really allows one to go deeper than any other training into one's own leadership strengths and challenges. Valuing and respecting all different aspects of leadership and what they allow an organization or a sector to accomplish so that you begin to appreciate (and hopefully recruit to and develop) those disparate approaches into a team. The mix of learning and doing/grappling/sitting with each new area that is introduced. (Human Rights and National Security Reform Cohort)My other trainings were skill-specific (esp strategic communications). Rockwood's approach can enhance the leadership capacity of individuals by addressing their needs and strengths holistically, from the physical/biological to the psychological and social system level. (Media Cohort)The cohort approach was crucial for building our sector and strengthening interpersonal relationships that got leveraged professionally. (Media Cohort)The Rockwood Fellowship was unique from other leadership trainings because it combined individual leadership development and skills with movement building skills. The fact that I was learning to be a stronger leader along side others in the media reform/justice movement made the program so much more beneficial. (Media Cohort)Rockwood offers such a wide variety of tools--i felt i could pick and choose which ones worked for me and which ones to implement with my organization. I had never been to a fellowship that was multi-year, either. Rockwood understands that true leadership development is constant and is evolving, and your trainings embody that concept. (Media Cohort)
Other Themes:Focus on resolving interpersonal issues
UPDATE 11/12/12: Updated chart based on latest charts [Natalia] DONE 11/13/12
UPDATE 11/12/12: Updated chart based on latest charts [Natalia]. DONE 11/13/12Two things jump out:Fellows feel least prepared to have collaborative conversations. Personal work tools are not used to strengthen organization or sector level work. Question: Are these missed opportunities?
UPDATE 11/12/12: Updated chart based on latest charts [Natalia] DONE 11/13/12
Effects on Job (Question 10):I realized I needed to be working on important things in important ways and at my old job I no longer was doing that. It was incredibly helpful to be at Rockwood to focus my purpose and passion, and prepare for how to leave my old job. (Media Cohort)Rockwood helped me clarify how I could be most useful to the sector and that I needed an organizational change for health/balance reasons. (Media Cohort)My experience with Rockwood helped remind me why I work in the nonprofit sector and learn to appreciate my own leadership style and skills. Knowing those things helped me transition out of a position that was draining my spirit. (Human Rights and National Security Reform Cohort)
UPDATE 11/12/12: Updated chart based on latest charts [Natalia] DONE 11/13/12.This chart changed significantly from the last version of PPT (the last version did not incorporate the “no answers” into the totals.
Other ThemesI would not say that the fellowship brought me closer to any of my colleagues in particularCollaboration Stories (Question 21)There are several examples but the most significant would be with one peer. First, I have built an organization from my Rockwood experience that is now two years old. Many of my Rockwood peers have been instrumental in helping with the vision and development of my organizaiton. Secondly, I have partnered and cosponsored webinars with one cohorts organization. I am currenlty partnering with another cohort on a government grant that will benefit both organizations. I continue to have and make other opportunities with my cohorts that I wouldnt' have had. (LGBTQ Cohort)I'm not sure how to answer this question. Of course I've collaborated with and supported colleagues who were also in the Rockwood Fellowship, but those relationships existed before Rockwood and were developed through many intersections before and after Rockwood. I wouldn't say that the Rockwood Fellowship brought me much closer to any of my colleagues in particular. The Art of Leadership training, which did foster relationship building, was done with others outside of my sector. The Dialogue Retreat (in my experience of it) created a fairly caustic atmosphere that didn't promote relationship development. I don't recall other elements of the fellowship program, like a listserv or peer coaching. I think those were not yet in place when I participated in this. However, the tools and skills I gained through Art of Leadership have helped me in my collaborations. (Media Cohort)We launched the Knowledge Exchange Project with Consumers Union to extend the collaborative process of the Media Reform and Justice Sector. (Media Cohort)The relationships I built with the other two women in my cohort have been so valuable. We spoke on a regular basis for several months after Rockwood and have developed unique relationship with each other that allow us to work through both personal and professional challenges as well as share resources for success in our day to day work. (Media Cohort)A number of the fellows in my cohort are now on the same board of directors. I've found it extremely valuable to have a deeper relationship with these individuals and to have a common language and approach towards the work and solving the challenges. (LGBTQ Cohort)
Updated 1/30/13MediaCoverageKylar Broadus Makes History Before the Senate http://www.glaad.org/blog/kylar-broadus-makes-history-senateKylar Broadus: First Transgender Person to Testify Before the Senate http://feministing.com/2012/06/12/kylar-broadus-first-transgender-person-to-testify-before-the-senate/Excerpts from Interview with KylarOur mission is to work and empower trans-people of color. We want to make sure that trans-people are included and visible in legislation to learning how to advocate for themselves, supporting and trying to work towards solving and responding to the hate crime and murders that go on around the country, and support the groups out there that are doing the work, and then lifting all those people up, and giving them the opportunity to be heard and visible.Do you have funding?We have minor funding, some funding, hopefully we will have some soon. I just did a Funders training last week in Oakland. We’ll see. This was a group that was trying to do some funder education. We’re trying to get our name out to funders, and the visibility of our work out there.How do you do your work? How do you connect?We do web, in person. We have been at Creating Change the last two years. We hope to be there a third year doing workshops,having hospitality or a get-together there. The Philly Trans Health Conference. A lot of trans groups there. We try to be visible there. We’ve done a series of town halls around the nation. The last one in SF, we have more requests for those, but we are working to build our infrastructure, and support the outreach. Are you volunteer driven?We are all volunteer. If you had not done the fellowship, how would this have looked different?I would not have met the people I met and made intimate friendships with them, to have them feel safe enough to work with me on a webinar, for instance. Having those experiences of people getting to know you when you need something it’s great they are just there.
Updated 1/30/13Excerptsfrom Interview with Nusrat J. ChoudhuryWe are working on a potential lawsuit involving AMEMSA communities. I would have come across them doing outreach for this lawsuit, but the difference was those guys were my friends, and I could say let’s do something here. It’s a completely different dynamic. They knew who I was. I’m coming from the ACLU doesn’t work specifically on issues for the communities they serve. They knew me personally and knew my personal story and how I am from the community and what my goals are. They knew my life purpose. Our interactions were based on trust and respect that would not have otherwise existed. IT fast-forwarded us three months. It doesn’t mean we always agree, but our working relations are extremely collaborative and efficient.
Updated 1/30/13Excerpts from Interview with Jenny ToomeyA collaborationcame out of the Center for Media Justice and the Consumer Union, a grassroots and inside the beltway group -- a systemic project that has been underway for five years, called the Knowledge Exchange. For a while grassroots groups came to Washington and Washington groups went to visit grassroots groups. That has evolved to grassroots groups coming to Washington, because it was more worth their while to go to Washington, but initially it was important to go both ways to demonstrate union. Instead of having two factions, there is now a realization that we need both, and each can carry the piece that makes sense for them and amplifying it through the other channels. There were many conversations [through Rockwood] that opened the possibility for collaboration. I saw the moment where someone realized that someone else might be offering them something beneficial, rather than assuming that they were questioning their strategy.That’s a huge success.We we are building friendships and collaboration between media policy and, for example, reproductive rights groups. Then when fights like Project IP Act (PIPA) or Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA)occur that sought to change structure of the internet, the Center for Media Justice (a backbone organization) has reached out through the magnet network, and gotten180-200 groups who work on media as a second or third issue to weigh in. We have these rarefied issues that are very difficult to unpack, they are technical and wonky, but because we are seeding these opportunities for people to see the overlap, and build trust, at moments when we need to speak with a bigger voice, we are beginning to find that voice. A lot of that has happened as a result of the magnet groups knowing they can call inside the beltway groups and get any information they need, and that there is a trust and willingness to collaborate between groups. It’s not perfect and it never will be, but they’ve been given the tools they need to be able to have hard conversations. Once in awhile it may be important for the funder to come and talk, but it’s much better if they solve those problems themselves.
Clearly the relationships, peer support, and opportunities to collaborate across geography are areas where respondents reported the highest degree of personal effectiveness.
UPDATE 11/12/12: Updated chart based on latest charts [Natalia]. DONE 11/13/12Note about the chart: this chart includes N/As (only 3 in entire dataset)Surprised to see have difficult conversations listed near the bottom of effectiveness even though it is one of the tools that is applied most frequently by fellows.
UPDATE 11/12/12: Updated chart based on latest charts [Natalia] DONE 11/13/12
Contributions – Personal (Question 24) I finished Rockwood two years ago and my boss STILL talks about it. I've gotten complements from coworkers too. I just can't credit the program enough with finally giving me space to do the work I needed to do. (Human Rights and National Security Reform Cohort)I am now able to claim an independent strategic analysis and voice and operationalize big ideas that are well ahead of the status quo in social change work. This doesn't always make me popular, but it earns respect and lets me identify authentic collaborative partners within and outside of formal organizational structures. (Media Cohort)I think Rockwood help to renewed my spirit and propel me to create an organization to create change. (LGBTQ Cohort)I am now a stronger advocate for myself, current organization and the larger progressive movement overall from my participation in Rockwood! (LGBTQ Cohort)Rockwood gave me tools to think about each day as challenges come up -- both in order to prevent challenges from derailing me from pursuing my purpose and vision, and in order to manage those challenges in the moment. The techniques are not always intuitive, but they are insightful and help me be more proactive in creating conditions where I and others can thrive. Rockwood also gave me tools to build structures that foster my ability to improve my leadership. I meet with my peer counselor and continue to work through challenges that I am facing, and to set goals. (Human Rights and National Security Reform Cohort)Rockwood shifted my relationship to critical feedback. I learned to really hear the feedback as something to grow and learn from--as a gift, and not to take it personally. As a result, I seek feedback and critique so that i can continue to grow as a leader and strengthen my organization. It was a huge shift for me. (Media Cohort)I have benefited from Rockwood on several levels: the identification of these leadership characteristics as benchmarks has been very helpful in and of itself; the Rockwood experience was pivotal in helping me to seize upon these particular leadership characteristics as personally and professionally important and useful to me, and this has allowed me to make progress over time. There is something about the investment in MY PERSONAL contribution to social movements that is symbolized by my participation in Rockwood that continues to be meaningful to me - it signifies some external affirmation of my own value, and this in itself remains significant to me. (Media Cohort)I think Rockwood help to renewed my spirit and propel me to create an organization to create change. (LGBTQ Cohort)
Other ThemesInvestment in my personal contributions to social movementI like to tools but not always use themMindfulness and personal ecology
UPDATE 11/12/12: Updated chart based on latest charts [Natalia] DONE 11/13/12
UPDATE 11/12/12: Updated chart based on latest charts [Natalia] DONE 11/13/12This chart includes N/A answers (only 2 in dataset)
UPDATE 11/12/12: Updated chart based on latest charts [Natalia] DONE 11/13/12
26. As you look at the list above, how would you describe the contribution of the Rockwood Fellowship to strengthening your sector/community/movement? % who answered the Rockwood Fellowship made a very significant and a significant contributionHRNSR did not perceive itself as a sector before the Rockwood Fellowship which may be one reason why the Fellowship Program demonstrates a stronger affect.
Excerpts from the Survey to Question 27: Please briefly describe the contribution the Rockwood Fellowship made to strengthening your sector/community/movement.. But I CAN say that Rockwood is now in the process of influencing the priorities, styles and skills of leaders within the ACLU as of the past year or two, and I think that this will have an impact on the culture of the organization, which operates as a social movement unto itself, and is also at times able to collaborate well with other organizations and movements. (Media Cohort)Again, I am skeptical of the long term impact of the Rockwood investment in the field. Several structural issues have completely broken down, power has simply changed hands with little-to-no collaborative strategy to include the whole field, and the field bleeds talent on a regular basis. When there is a policy success (see SOPA/PIPA), it is very difficult to assign responsibility for that success to any of the fellowship groups or their associations, because larger non-policy organizations took the real lead (Wikipedia and Reddit, in the SOPA/PIPA) example. The field seems incapable of putting personalities aside to address its structural vulnerabilities, and the resources and infrastructure for the work are disappearing or moving to other centers of power in the media/technology landscape that are more agile and in touch with the contemporary communications landscape. (Media Cohort) It is my understanding that the first time community based organizations had an opportunity to have "difficult conversations" about resources, power, racial justice, etc., with other sectors (policy folks, legal advocates) in the NSHR realm was at Rockwood. That was important, because the conversations have continued, albeit very slow. (Humans Right Cohort) Bringing people together to address challenges and find opportunities has been so important in improving our work. We're not where we need to be yet, but Rockwood has really improved where we are! (Human Rights and National Security Reform Cohort)By fostering meaningful relationships between people from different organizations, the Rockwood Fellowship has helped to break down some of the barriers that exist between organizations simply because people don't know each other. I am more trusting of other organizations where my fellowship peers work, and I know that I can pick up the phone to call my fellowship peer to find out what is going on or why that organization took a position that is contrary to our own. (Human Rights and National Security Reform Cohort)Lots of us know each other and have a deeper personal respect/support for each other, but the institutional blocks to the goals above remain much larger than can be addressed by relationship-building alone. (Human Rights and National Security Reform Cohort)Rockwood was able to pull together individuals from national and local organizations and get us all in the same room for the shared purpose of strenghthening our movement. Some of the real and perceived barriers to having authentic conversations with our colleagues in the room were alleviated at times. (Media Cohort)Discussions within the sector that work on different angles and with different constituencies provided very useful learning opportunities and the ability to share best practices with those we may not normally be in touch with. (Human Rights and National Security Reform Cohort)It has been very helpful to increase the capacity of the field's leaders and to provide some shared language/shared experience. And gathering people from our sector together is always helpful in building relationships just by virtue of sharing space & place. However, I can't say from my experience that the Fellowship was as successful in strengthening the connections in the sector as it it was in strengthening individual leaders' capacity. There has been some missed opportunity there. I hope the Fellowship Program has grown and strengthened since I was part of it. (Media Cohort)Many of the people and organizations involved in media reform were not at all focused on relationships or process. I think Rockwood contributed to a space where we could create and Media & Democracy Coalition and where relationships between more social justice type groups and Washington DC groups would be stronger. The challenge is that this work is ongoing and we are going to start losing the benefits of the work since it is not kept up. (Media Cohort)
Other Themes:Institutional blocks remain much larger than can be addressed by relationship building alone
Program Recommendations (Question 18)I think Rockwood can't expect power dynamcis of a movement not to play out in their trainings. And while I know Rockwood worked to create a safe space, i knew that anything i said or did in front of my peers in that room, was being fed back to people outside of the room. I actually felt my best training was the Art of Leadership where i got to meet and work with people from other sectors. By the time I got to the final training in April of 2011, i felt less safe to truly express myself. (Media Cohort)At the time I was in the fellowship, it was still new and being developed. While the Art of Leadership training was very valuable, the other elements of the fellowship seemed either to not come to fruition or were less valuable. For instance, the "Dialogue Retreat" was poorly facilitated and did not reflect and understanding of the field, the issues we work on, or the community's needs. I think the fellowship could have done more to talk with the field's leaders to understand specifically which training modules and which conversations were most needed. It may also have been helpful to acknowledge the vast differences in capacity among the organizations and leaders in the field. Rockwood could have also been helpful in giving the field a framework for understanding the importance of all the different strategies that different groups were using, and how the groups in the field could best own their particular role while respecting and complementing the work of others. (Media Cohort)Potential to connect with other gatherings in the field (e.e. cohorts or workshops to share learnings, tools, and other things from the fellowship with others in the filed). Space and support to go much deeper around issues of power dynamics, especially race, gender and class in the field. (Media Cohort)Less focus on creating work collaborations between the participants. It seemed forced and the least valuable piece of the fellowship. Our personal relationships with each other are far more valuable and long lasting. (LGBTQ Cohort)Fellows need ongoing support and frameworks for returning to the "Rockwood" space on an as-needed basis. Old patterns and weaknesses in the way cohorts relate to each other settle back in after a short period of years. Also, fellows should commit to programatically including their whole staffs in Rockwood methods to further enable long term culture change. (Media Cohort)I'm not as big a fan of the spirituality aspect of the trainings as others may have been, so I think it's important that you don't just make an assumption that everyone is going to appreciate that component. (Human Rights and National Security Reform Cohort)While I thought that the Fellowship did help me change my attitude and work on my leadership skills quite a bit, I felt there was a lack of translating that into work for my organization and my community. I felt like a strong leader, but I was still not in a position to change things at my organization per se. I'm not sure if there's a way to help mid-level management find ways to improve their professional environments when they are not in a position to overhaul or even change office culture drastically. I believe that in my immediate circles I did try to make things better, but I'm not sure how much of an impact I was able to make. Also - when I went abroad, many of the office culture elements were literally thrown out the window because things are socially and culturally very different. In that setting, I was unable to use much of the training skills. However, it did help me stay strong as a person, regardless. (Human Rights and National Security Reform Cohort)
Other ThemesLess focus on creating work collaborations between participants (more on personal relationships)Leadership within organizations (as oppose to with outside groups)
Sometimes the "buddy" we ended up with was not the right fit or that's what we were left with. The trainer or Rockwood should find a way to check in with the pair to make sure the connection is working. Or maybe stragglers could be hooked up with stragglers from other trainings. Is there a "tool" that might help the matching go better? Would have been great if they could find a way to connect me with a better partner. Also, the time difference was a problem with our schedules.