1. 1. Clarity of introduction (succinct presentation of relevant case history
1. Clarity of introduction (succinct presentation of relevant case historyand background
material) 5 4 3 2 12. Clarity of diagnostic statement and supporting rationale. 5 4 3 2 13.
Operationalization of client problem (identification ofsymptomatology in measurable
terms) 5 4 3 2 14. Literature review on available scales or indices measuring
diagnosedproblem(s) 5 4 3 2 15. Identification of selected measure(s), including
psychometric andcultural supporting rationale. 5 4 3 2 16. Clear, operational desсrіption of
selected intervention. 5 4 3 2 17. Rationale for intervention (with supportive literature, as
appropriate) 5 4 3 2 18. Desсrіption of evaluation design (tracking process and outcome) 5
4 3 2 19. Presentation and interpretation of case data (with appropriate charts,graphs, or
figures) 5 4 3 2 110. Summary critiquing this evaluation process (i.e. would theinformation
gained guide treatment decisions and progress in thiscase?)5 4 3 2 111. Statement of
broader implications for social work practice(virtues/costs of evaluative approach as
generally applied to practice,and social policy/advocacy implications)5 4 3 2 112. Overall
writing quality including spelling, grammar, and adherence toAPA guidelines for scholarly
writing (7th ed.)5 4 3 2 1PART I (means of items 1-5, 12) ＝PART I revised (mean of items
1-5, 12) ＝PART II (mean of items 6-11) ＝see attachment (use as headings)the attachmetn
is the paper with the professors notes. The details above are the intructions