Objectives: Present logically persuasive arguments in writing.Apply
philosophi
Objectives:Present logically persuasive arguments in writing.Apply philosophical ideas
relating to moral relativism to daily activities, and to issues in contemporary
debates.Evaluate personal and social responsibilities of living in a diverse
world.Demonstrate understanding of Moral Relativism.Reading Materials:Ethics Choices 3e
(Burnor & Raley) Ch. 2 Moral Relativism.Case 3: Female Genital Mutilation at the end of
Burnor & Raley 3e Ch. 2. In 2e, it is Case 2.Instructions for how to participate in discussions
here on Canvas.“They Say, I Say” writing and research guide.INSTRUCTIONS:1. Based on
what you read in Case 3. Should Fauziya have accepted her country’s cultural practices,
stayed in Togo, and submitted to female genital mutilation and marriage? What would a
moral relativist say? Do you agree? Why or why not?Write 3-4 paragraphs ( approximately
500 words) evaluating the ethical issues of the case and arguing FOR or AGAINST the
practice of female genital mutilation. Explain what a moral relativist would have to say
about this case. Explain why you agree or disagree with the relativist. Convince your
classmates that your view is the morally best answer for this case.2. Substantively reply to
two of your class mates’ posts. Note: you must write your initial post before you can reply to
classmates. Replies are due the Sunday following the due date of the initial post.
Respectfully explain to your classmates WHY you agree or disagree with their position on
this case. Don’t just say that you agree or disagree. You should explain WHY you do. Support
your view with reasons.Suggested Initial Post FORMAT:Paragraph 1: Summarize the case
scenario briefly, focusing on the elements that you will address in your argument. State
your thesis (pick a position either FOR or AGAINST female genital mutilation.Paragraph 2:
They say. Describe what position a moral relativist would take on this question. What
reasons would a moral relativist give in support of this position?Paragraph 3: I say. State
whether you agree or disagree with the relativists position on this case. Explain WHY you
agree or disagree. Support your position with an argument.You may want to write an extra
paragraph for the “they say” part of your discussion and/or an extra paragraph for the “I
say” part.REPLIES:Replies should be substantial paragraphs that respond, comment, apply,
critique, add examples, or further the discussion. Pay attention to the structure, clarity,
explanation, and arguments given by your peers. Note how important it is to explain the
case study clearly using details so that any reader can understand the case and ethical
dilemma even if they have not read it.