EDLD 5352 Technology Action Plan

EDLD 5352 Instructional Leadership: The Technology Link Linda Supak EDLD 5352 EA1191

Week 4 Assignment, Part 1: Development of an organization chart integrating
technology
Using the campus and district improvement plans, and any suggested technology
improvements, develop an organization chart that includes the following:

• Identify by title or job description all personnel/stakeholders responsible for integrating
technology and instructional and organization leadership from the district office to the
campus and classroom;
• Provide a brief description of the role and responsibilities of all identified personnel in
your organizational chart;
• Discuss the role of the principal in making sure the organizational chart is implemented
and monitored.

School Board

Superintendent

Director of Assistant Superintendent of

Network Technician Teacher
Administrator Technology

Campus

Assistant

Classroom

SBDM

Campus Support

Students
Page 1 – Revised October 2009


Position / Title Responsibility
School Board Responsible in establishing policies, setting
goals, and budgeting allocations to meet
technology goals of the school district as well
as the functions essential for day-to-day
operations of the district.

Superintendent of Schools Oversees the everyday operations of the
school. Responsible for providing leadership
and direction for the school district, ensuring
the appropriate resources and data are used
for development, funding, implementation, and
monitoring of technology programs and goals,
as well as overall district goals, and resources
to meet the needs of all students. Ensures the
vision of school is being met.
Assistant Superintendent of Responsible for implementation of district
Curriculum & Instruction curriculum, integrating the TEKS and
technology TEKS, ensuring district technology
goals and objectives are being met. Guides
the development of technology curriculum
integration and supervises campus principals
to ensure learning; works collaboratively with
the superintendent planning technology for the
district.
Director of Technology/Information Recommends technology needs of the district.
Services Responsible for coordinating the purchase,
installation and access of innovative
technology as required to meet the district/state
technology plan. Manages the technology
department in order to support district goals.
Oversees the overall performance of
technology for the district.
Network Administrator Maintains the district network. Provides
technological support to district and all
campuses. Oversees filtering and blocks of
internet sites.
Technician Provides assistance and support for the
district’s computers / laptops and networks.

Teacher Technology Specialist Provides assistance and support to teachers
for technology, resources, and services. Plans
and coordinates all district technology training
and staff development.
Campus Principals Instructional leader for the campus.
Responsible for modeling and ensure the use
of technology on the campus. Assess and
ensures goals of CIP are implemented and
established on the campus.



Assistant Principals Work in conjunction with the campus principal
to ensure and oversee technology
implementation, its availability and
effectiveness.
Classroom Teachers Responsible for integration of district
technology initiatives into the classroom
ensuring that Technology TEKS are being
addressed, monitoring safe usage of student
technology. Differentiates instruction to
enhance learning for all students through
implementation of technology in classroom
according to campus/district technology goals
and CIP.
SBDM Committee Team of administrators, teachers, and
community members responsible for setting
campus/district goals. Recommends
technology initiatives through analysis of AEIS
and AYP.
Campus Support Staff Support administrators and teachers in
technology implementation and campus goals
and needs.

Students Follow policies and rules per district policy

The role of the Principal in making sure the organizational chart is
implemented and monitored.
The principal is the “boss” of the campus. He/she is the instructional leader and makes the final
decisions for the campus. The campus Principal:

• Models and expects technology implementation and effective use
• Manages the budget to support campus technology programs and goals
• Maintains alignment of resources for improved student learning and achievement
• Builds responsive environment to capitalize on teaching, learning, and involvement from
all stakeholders
• Provides greater opportunities for learning – online, digital, and distance learning

The Principal encourages collaboration and communication with technology, communicating with
faculty and staff in order to meet local CIP and state goals and objectives. Staying abreast of
new technology updates is pertinent in technology applications. The Principal ensures that
technology is integrated and used properly. To monitor the implementation, the Principal will
also evaluate through PDAS. Through data from the STaR Chart, the Principal ensures that the
needs of his campus are provided to support professionals and students as well as all
stakeholders.



Week 4 Assignment, Part 2: Professional Development Planning
Using the campus and district improvement plans, and any suggested technology
improvements, develop professional development activities that include the following:

• Reference analysis and lessons learned about the technology needs from the Week 3
report;
• Addresses professional development designed to improve the gathering, analysis and use
of data from a variety of sources;
• Includes professional development to improve decision making in the integration of
technology with instructional and organizational leadership.

Each teacher is required to submit the Campus STaR Chart so that we can track trends
and determine how well technology is utilized on our campus. This is one area our
administrators and appropriate personnel look to determine how we can better train and
implement the software and hardware currently available as well as budget for
equipment and software to better meet the needs of our campus. Effective professional
development is ongoing and based on individual and campus needs. By thoroughly
analyzing previous weeks’ information of our campus STaR Chart, CIP, District
Technology Plan, and Long-Range Plan for Technology, I have developed the following
plan to increase student exposure to technology in the classroom and improve their
academic performance; therefore bringing into play the student-centered classroom
which will “transform the teaching process by allowing for greater levels of interest,
inquiry, analysis, collaboration, creativity, and content production” (Long-Range Plan for
Technology, 2006-2020, p. 18). Our campus/district uses a wide range of technology
and information systems. As our STaR Chart results have shown, we are weak in the
area of Teaching & Learning. It is evident that all members need training. In order to
reach our goal of Target Tech, understanding how to analyze and use the various
reports and resources available will strengthen integration of technology and shed a
new light of success for our 21st Century learners.



EL CAMPO MIDDLE SCHOOL ACTION PLAN
Goal To increasing awareness and knowledge of technology and resources
available to teachers and students, providing teachers with skills
necessary to integrate technology into their classrooms as well as
effectively use technology for assessment and monitoring student
growth.

Activity Person Resources Timeline Evaluation
Responsible
Analysis of the Director of Technology Computers July, 2011 – Teachers are able to
Texas STaR Chart with online May, 2011 better interpret data,
& Campus Data – Teacher Technology access determining weak
Needs Specialist Analysis is areas
Assessment Printouts of ongoing
Principal/Assistant Campus STaR Professional staff
Principals Chart, AEIS use campus data to
Report, CIP, recognize
Campus teachers LRPT achievement gaps of
diverse learners

Orientation and Director of Technology Microsoft July, 2011 Teachers will
Introduction to Word integrate technology
Training of current Campus Principal/Asst. seamlessly into daily
technology Principals Powerpoint lessons, improving
applications Presentation student learning
capabilities

Eduphoria training Teacher Technology Technology July, 2011 – TAKS data
Workshop Specialist Programs May, 2011 monitoring
Campus Computer lab/ Ongoing Improved TAKS
Principal/Assistant online access follow-ups scores/comparisons
Principals and support
Disaggregated data
comparisons/history
Program reports



Professional
development
evaluation form

Qwizdom Teacher Technology Computer Lab July, 2011 – Observe classroom
Responder Specialist Ongoing integration &
Training Qwizdom throughout support; walk-
Principal/Assistant Responders year throughs
Principals
CScope Maintain shared
Curriculum folder for grade level
(align with content curriculum
current district integration of
curriculum) customized lessons
STaR chart
improvement
Evaluation of
student performance
Professional
development
evaluation form

Blogs Director of Technology Computers Follow up Evaluate posts on
Principal with online each 3-week blogs
access: Web progress
Assistant Principals 2.0 tools period Allow feedback after
each session
“Creating
Blogs” Question/answer
information forum
sheets



Week 4 Assignment, Part 3: Evaluation Planning for Action Plan
The technology action plan integrating instructional an organizational leadership must include
evaluation components that provide measurable outcomes designed to address the following:

• Uses data and other analysis from the Week 3 report, including using the campus and
district improvement plans, and local or state technology plans;
• Provides assessments and/or monitoring reports measuring professional development
designed to use technology to improve the gathering, analysis and use of data from a
variety of sources;
• Provides assessments and/or monitoring evaluating professional development to improve
decision making in the integration of technology with instructional and organizational
leadership.
Over the past few weeks, many profiles, questionnaires, interviews, discussions, and reviews
have been conducted. We have the technology available; our infrastructure is in place. Many
of the issues of my campus are clear. The needs of my campus strongly correspond to the
STaR chart results. It is evident that we need the training in order to effectively utilize the
advancements our campus/district has made. We must not only focus on the needs of the
students, but on the needs of the teachers – the need for professional development and
training. Also, having the availability 24/7 will help reach all teachers and provide immediate
support necessary.

In order to stay on track with our goals, the CIP will set goals aligned with the LRPT. My plan is
based on my analysis of the STaR Chart for my campus. We begin with a campus needs
assessment which combines the analysis of various data. When referencing our District
Technology Plan, we do align with the Texas LRPT. Our district has great expectations to
become technologically advanced, but we have a way to go. Technology is a key component of
teaching in our global society today. As educators modify teaching, the improvement support
students and facilitate learning. Therefore, it is imperative to increase awareness and
knowledge of technology while providing resources to both teachers and students.
Furthermore, providing teachers with skills necessary to integrate technology into their
classrooms affords effective use of technology for assessment and monitoring student growth
as well as an understanding of the benefits technology can bring to the learning environment.

Our District Technology Plan is updated yearly to re-evaluate as to the progress we have made
in our district in comparison to state goals. To assess and update my action plan for my
campus, several tools will be used to monitor progress, technology integration, and teacher
response to technology. Our campus data reports, AEIS, AYP, STaR, and Campus CIP will be
valuable tools to assess and monitor progress and determine weak areas we need to continue
supporting. These formal reports may also show new areas to concentrate on as our needs
change. Evaluations and monitoring will take place continually through every step of this plan,
during 3-week progress periods as well as each 9-week period. Campus principals will
continually monitor classroom performance for evidence of technology integration to ensure
TEKS are being met. Walk-through will provide valuable information on the effectiveness of
training, teacher comfort, and confidence in use. Blogging also encompasses communications
and learning. Through blogging, we bring another element of technology into the classroom
which can be used by all stakeholders, parents, and students; the possibilities are endless. We
will also use surveys to provide feedback on training effectiveness; areas that teachers feel



confident and areas where more tech training or improvement is needed. Additional support will
be provided where necessary. As our technology plan aligns with the Texas long range plan for
technology, integrating technology promotes life-long learning for our students to prepare each
of them to for our global world. It is also our responsibility to stay abreast of the current
technology so that we engage our students in higher-level productivity and efficiency and proper
uses of technology. Technology has become the communication tool for all schools, and
implementation is an ongoing project; technology is critical in the success of our leaders of the
future. It will be interesting to see where the technology we now use leads us in the future.

Evaluation Monitoring Timeline
Teacher’s integration of new On-going July, 2011 – May,
technology: Implementation of 2011
Qwizdom Responders PDAS
Ongoing follow-ups
CIP / Campus Goals & Objectives and support
Walk-Throughs & Formative
Evaluations

Lesson Plans

Shared folder for grade level content
curriculum integration of customized
lessons

Student-Centered differentiated
instruction

Student Projects

Impact of new instructional Benchmarks Each 9-Week period
strategies on student learning
9-Week Assessments Ongoing – throughout
school year
Campus reports: AEIS, AYP, STaR

Teacher survey

Technology support for Blogging & TAKS scores/comparisons Follow up each 3-
use of Eduphoria for enhanced week progress period
learning Disaggregated data
comparisons/history Ongoing

Posts on blogs: Question/answer
forum

Teacher surveys / evaluation form

Principal observations



Professional Development Evaluation Form
Date: _________________________ Presenter: _____________________________

What was the name of the training you attended? ________________________________

Where was the training held? ________________________________
___________________________________

Use the following scale to answer the questions below:
_________________________________
5 = Strongly Agree 4 = Agree 3 = Neutral 2 = Disagree 1 = Strongly Disagree

The training goals were made clear? 1 2 3 4 5

The content presented was clear and organized? 1 2 3 4 5

The training materials were helpful learning tools that I will use? 1 2 3 4 5

The trainer was well prepared and knowledgeable about the subject? 1 2 3 4 5

The training supported district goals? 1 2 3 4 5

The trainer welcomed participants’ questions and comments and 1 2 3 4 5
answered questions?

The training session was worth the time invested? 1 2 3 4 5

Comments and/or suggestions:
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________



References:
Miller, G., et al. (2006). Texas Long-Range Plan for Technology: A Report to the
80th Legislature from the Texas Education Agency, retrieved March 2, 2011 from
http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/technology/EktronAttach/FinalCombinedLRPT2020.pdf
Texas Education Association. (2006). Texas star chart: Campus chart. Instructional
Materials and Educational Technology Division. Retrieved from
www.tea.state.us/starchart

El Campo ISD. (2010-2011). El Campo ISD District Technology Plan, 2010-2011.
El Campo, Texas: El Campo ISD.
El Campo ISD. (2010-1011). El Campo Middle School Campus Improvement Plan,
2010-2011. El Campo, Texas: El Campo ISD.



Week 4 Assignment, Part 4: Posting your Action Report and Responding to Other
Students’ action plans
Using the discussion board and the blog that you have developed, please write and post
your action plan, and be sure to:

• Read and review at least two other action plans

• Respond to other action plans by posting your comments and reflections

The purpose of the action report is to provide you with recommended procedures for
gathering, analyzing, and using data from a variety of sources for informed campus decision
making focusing on the effective integration of technology in curriculum, instruction,
assessment and professional development. Students may wish to use this action plan as
one of your school improvement projects for your Electronic Portfolio. You may also use the
Week 3 and Week 4 assignments as campus supervised hours for your internship logs. As
indicated these two weeks fall under Domain II, Instructional Leadership, and address
elements of Competencies 4, 5 and 7.


EDLD 5352 Technology Action Plan

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (19)

Similar to EDLD 5352 Technology Action Plan

Similar to EDLD 5352 Technology Action Plan (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

EDLD 5352 Technology Action Plan