SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 5
Descargar para leer sin conexión
TEAM NAME –
TEAM DR. B.R.
AMBEDKAR
PRESENTATION OF
THE LEGAL ISSUES IN
GIVEN PROBLEM
LIST OF MEMBERS OF DR. B.R.
AMBEDKAR GROUP.
SHAILESH KUMAR PANDEY- CO-ORDINATOR
ROSHAN BALI- REPORTER
OTHER MEMBERS
NOOPUR GARG
SHREYA SURESH
SHIVAM JAISWAL
ARNAV YADAV
SONU
SHRISHTI
CASE DETAILS
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF OF NAMAKKAL O.S. 1234 / 2008
Plaintiff –
Dr. Madan
Defendant
1.Banwari (died)
2.Radhika
3.Malar
4 Maniammai
5.Joseph
6.Velu
7.Mani
ISSUES FRAMED AS
TO FACT
Whether the suit is maintainable or barred under the rule of Res-judicata
enumerated in S-11 C.P.C.?
Whether the suit is maintainable or barred under the rule of the Limitation Act
1963?
Whether the family arrangement entered between the plaintiff and husband of
defendant-1 fraudulent or not?
Whether the previous judgment (No.366/2001) obtained by the husband of
Defendant-1 is legally binding or not?
Whether the title of the suit property belongs to the plaintiff or not?
Whether the defendant conducted after entering into the contract of Lease by
challenging title of the plaintiff amounts to fraud or not?
QUESTIONS AS TO FACT
ISSUES FRAMED AS TO LAW
Whether an unregistered family arrangement has any legal effect as to
transfer of title to immovable property or not?
Does an unstamped unregistered document have admissibility in a court of
law as evidence in any legal case is not?
Can any legal claim arise out of an unregistered document whose registration
is made mandatory under Section 17 of the registration Act 1908?
Whether plaintiffs claim that an earlier decree was based upon fraudulent
family arrangement is barred under Section 17 of the limitation act or not?
Can unregistered mortgage deeds whose registration has been made
mandatory by Section 59 of the Transfer of Property Act 1882 be considered
for adjudication of suit or not?
QUESTIONS AS TO LAW

Más contenido relacionado

Último

Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24
Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24
Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24Jong Hyuk Choi
 
ENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened to
ENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened toENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened to
ENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened toirenelavilla52178
 
Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327
Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327
Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327bariajenne
 
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Material Facts For Declaratory Judgment Moti...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Material Facts For Declaratory Judgment Moti...Town of Haverhill's Statement of Material Facts For Declaratory Judgment Moti...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Material Facts For Declaratory Judgment Moti...Rich Bergeron
 
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...Rich Bergeron
 
OMassmann - Investment into the grid and transmission system in Vietnam (2024...
OMassmann - Investment into the grid and transmission system in Vietnam (2024...OMassmann - Investment into the grid and transmission system in Vietnam (2024...
OMassmann - Investment into the grid and transmission system in Vietnam (2024...Dr. Oliver Massmann
 
Ashutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdf
Ashutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdfAshutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdf
Ashutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdfVidit Agrawal
 
Town of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment Case
Town of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment CaseTown of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment Case
Town of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment CaseRich Bergeron
 
Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children (OSAEC) and Anti-Child S...
Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children (OSAEC) and Anti-Child S...Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children (OSAEC) and Anti-Child S...
Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children (OSAEC) and Anti-Child S...Diamond959916
 
Town of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC Counterclaims
Town of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC CounterclaimsTown of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC Counterclaims
Town of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC CounterclaimsRich Bergeron
 
IOS PPT.pptx doctrine of stare decisiss
IOS PPT.pptx  doctrine of stare decisissIOS PPT.pptx  doctrine of stare decisiss
IOS PPT.pptx doctrine of stare decisissPothysVaran1
 

Último (11)

Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24
Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24
Smarp snapshot 200 -- Google Cloud Next '24
 
ENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened to
ENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened toENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened to
ENG7-Q4-MOD3. determine the worth of ideas mentioned in the text listened to
 
Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327
Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327
Power Point Obligations and contracts Article 1313-1327
 
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Material Facts For Declaratory Judgment Moti...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Material Facts For Declaratory Judgment Moti...Town of Haverhill's Statement of Material Facts For Declaratory Judgment Moti...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Material Facts For Declaratory Judgment Moti...
 
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...
Town of Haverhill's Statement of Facts for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims ...
 
OMassmann - Investment into the grid and transmission system in Vietnam (2024...
OMassmann - Investment into the grid and transmission system in Vietnam (2024...OMassmann - Investment into the grid and transmission system in Vietnam (2024...
OMassmann - Investment into the grid and transmission system in Vietnam (2024...
 
Ashutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdf
Ashutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdfAshutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdf
Ashutosh Yadav v. State of UP 22nd March, 2024 All HC.pdf
 
Town of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment Case
Town of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment CaseTown of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment Case
Town of Haverhill's Summary Judgment Motion for Declaratory Judgment Case
 
Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children (OSAEC) and Anti-Child S...
Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children (OSAEC) and Anti-Child S...Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children (OSAEC) and Anti-Child S...
Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children (OSAEC) and Anti-Child S...
 
Town of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC Counterclaims
Town of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC CounterclaimsTown of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC Counterclaims
Town of Haverhill's Motion for Summary Judgment on DTC Counterclaims
 
IOS PPT.pptx doctrine of stare decisiss
IOS PPT.pptx  doctrine of stare decisissIOS PPT.pptx  doctrine of stare decisiss
IOS PPT.pptx doctrine of stare decisiss
 

issues framed for lex osmose DR AMBEDKAR GRP.pptx

  • 1. TEAM NAME – TEAM DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR PRESENTATION OF THE LEGAL ISSUES IN GIVEN PROBLEM
  • 2. LIST OF MEMBERS OF DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR GROUP. SHAILESH KUMAR PANDEY- CO-ORDINATOR ROSHAN BALI- REPORTER OTHER MEMBERS NOOPUR GARG SHREYA SURESH SHIVAM JAISWAL ARNAV YADAV SONU SHRISHTI
  • 3. CASE DETAILS IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF OF NAMAKKAL O.S. 1234 / 2008 Plaintiff – Dr. Madan Defendant 1.Banwari (died) 2.Radhika 3.Malar 4 Maniammai 5.Joseph 6.Velu 7.Mani
  • 4. ISSUES FRAMED AS TO FACT Whether the suit is maintainable or barred under the rule of Res-judicata enumerated in S-11 C.P.C.? Whether the suit is maintainable or barred under the rule of the Limitation Act 1963? Whether the family arrangement entered between the plaintiff and husband of defendant-1 fraudulent or not? Whether the previous judgment (No.366/2001) obtained by the husband of Defendant-1 is legally binding or not? Whether the title of the suit property belongs to the plaintiff or not? Whether the defendant conducted after entering into the contract of Lease by challenging title of the plaintiff amounts to fraud or not? QUESTIONS AS TO FACT
  • 5. ISSUES FRAMED AS TO LAW Whether an unregistered family arrangement has any legal effect as to transfer of title to immovable property or not? Does an unstamped unregistered document have admissibility in a court of law as evidence in any legal case is not? Can any legal claim arise out of an unregistered document whose registration is made mandatory under Section 17 of the registration Act 1908? Whether plaintiffs claim that an earlier decree was based upon fraudulent family arrangement is barred under Section 17 of the limitation act or not? Can unregistered mortgage deeds whose registration has been made mandatory by Section 59 of the Transfer of Property Act 1882 be considered for adjudication of suit or not? QUESTIONS AS TO LAW