SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 287
ar caa
UAV PROGRESS IN AUSTRALIA
ITS TIME FOR CHANGE
TERRY MARTIN
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Presentation Overview
1. Background
Background
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Presentation Overview
1. Background
• UAVs are goodness & some examples
• Links to Innovation, Automation and Jobs market in Australia
• Role of Regulation in a Healthy Innovation Ecosystem
• Status Update on Regulatory Environment
Background
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Presentation Overview
1. Background
2. Key Problems
• No Publically Available Plan
• Available Workforce
• Uncertain Scope ofWork
• What needs to be done
• National Priorities
• Skill and Substantiation:Avoiding Schedule Slippage …
Key Problems
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Presentation Overview
1. Background
2. Key Problems
3. Future Directions
Future Directions
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Presentation Overview
1. Background
2. Key Problems
3. Future Directions
• What’s Feasible with our workforce,
• Motivating & recruiting Industry Help
• Restructuring & Streamlining Working Groups
• Targeting Effort
• Identifying & Prioritising what’s necessary
• 80:20 Rule: Freeing up CASA staff from tactical day to day..
• CoordinatedTrials that support CASA strategic intent
Future Directions
BACKGROUND
UAVsareGoodness
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
NASA UAV Traffic Management (UTM)
Overview
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
NASA UAV Traffic Management (UTM)
Overview
Principal Investigator: Parimal Kopardekar
”a cloud-based system that will help manage traffic at low altitudes and avoid collisions of UASs being operated beyond visual line of
sight”
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
NASA UAV Traffic Management (UTM)
Overview
VIDEO Played
LINK : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83Y14qglTCY
Build 1: Completed
• Establishment of Airspace Reservation
• Focus on drone traffic management over
unpopulated land/water
• Minimal GA traffic, Aimed at agriculture, firefighting
& infrastructure
Build 2: Oct 2016
• Drones flying BLOS,
• Drone tracking, low density ops
• Sparsely populated areas
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
NASA UTM Traffic Management
• NASA Strategy is Crawl, Walk, Run.
• UTM starting in low Risk Environment
• To be conducted at Stead Airport in Reno, Nevada
• 2500 to 10, 000 Operations per month
• Community Recognition of Jobs creation possibilities
Trial Goals
• Examine “system” ability to respond to Contingencies
• Vehicle, GCS
• UTM System
• Fused UTM and ATM System
• UTM is cloud based: Examining QoS
• Miniature ADSB System
• Obstacles: LegacyVs New Age companies
• Raft of Separation Issues: Non Cooperative Participants, GPS Anomalies
Block 2 Trials
Build 3: Jan 2018
• Drone ControlVia INTERNET
• Communication
• Drone to Drone
• Drone to ATC
• Safe Separation
• BLOS
• Flight over Moderate Population
• Package Delivery
Build 4: March 2019
• Flight over Urban Areas
• High Density DroneTraffic
• Autonomous D to D
communication
• Large Scale Contingency MGT
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
NASA UAS Traffic Management
• Vehicle toVehicle communications
• Universal Drone Registration database
• Open identification systems
• Tamper proof flight recorders
• Up to date 3D Mapping-Obstacles
• Dynamic weather information
Ongoing UTM Research
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
NASA Looking for Partners to Help Make UTM a Reality
Source: http://www.unmannedsystemsaustralia.com.au/latestnews/?p=1220
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
NASA Looking for Partners to Help Make UTM a Reality
Source: http://www.unmannedsystemsaustralia.com.au/latestnews/?p=1220
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
NASA Looking for Partners to Help Make UTM a Reality
Source: http://www.unmannedsystemsaustralia.com.au/latestnews/?p=1220
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
NASA Looking for Partners to Help Make UTM a Reality
Source: http://www.unmannedsystemsaustralia.com.au/latestnews/?p=1220
How Self Healing will these networks be?
How will QoS be determined and delivered>
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Disruption
Google & Facebook: Next Gen Content Distribution
http://www.youtube.com/user/ProjectLoon
Recent payloads delivering
22MB/sec to ground antenna & 5
MB to handset
“muscle behind the balloon effort is
comparable to other Google X projects
like Glass or self-driving cars”.
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
DISRUPTIONS
• Google & Facebook battling to control information distribution & social media
to 5BN people who don’t have “proper” internet access
• Both companies have a significant interest in expediting the delivery
• Googles Android captured 79% of world wide market
• More people = greater revenue.
• Some scepticism about motivation: providing service to Africa doesn’t make cost sense
• Definite Social benefits: medical/farming advice, weather
• Project Loon: High altitude (Stratospheric) balloons tested in NZ, California
and Brazil.
Google & Facebook
http://www.techtimes.com/articles/15684/20140917/google-wants-to-test-drones-that-deliver-internet-access-in-new-mexico.htm
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Disruption
• Balloons at the mercy of weather, harder to control, and
durability concerns
• Are safer if they fall to earth
• Cost significantly less.
Google & Facebook: Next-Gen Content Distribution
GoogleTitan
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Disruption
• Balloons at the mercy of weather, harder to control, and durability
concerns
• Are safer if they fall to earth
• Cost significantly less.
• Google & Facebook investigating using high altitude, long
endurance solar UAVs.
• Google trumped Facebook in purchasingTitan Aerospace ($60M).
• Developing 2 dragon-fly shaped UAVs.
• Smaller variant has wingspan larger than Boeing 767
Google & Facebook: Next-Gen Content Distribution
GoogleTitan
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Disruption
• Balloons at the mercy of weather, harder to control, and durability
concerns
• Are safer if they fall to earth
• Cost significantly less.
• Google & Facebook investigating using high altitude, long
endurance solar UAVs.
• Google trumped Facebook in purchasingTitan Aerospace ($60M).
• Developing 2 dragon-fly shaped UAVs.
• Smaller variant has wingspan larger than Boeing 767
Google & Facebook: Next-Gen Content Distribution
GoogleTitan
Facebook Aquila
http://www.theguardian.com/
• Facebook purchased Ascenta ($20M)
Multiple Ad-Hoc Networks
Multi-hop wireless network: each network node acts as a wireless terminal as well as a router
Cost effective positioning of assets according to requirements:
• nodes have the flexibility to manouver to meet dynamic demand.
Key R&D focus areas include:
• Mobility Models: plays a significant role in network performance
• Trajectory planning & prediction
• Collision Detection and avoidance: multiple trajectories
• Routing protocols that discover & adjust to network topology
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Multiple Ad-Hoc Networks
Swarms
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Multiple Adhoc Networks
Swarms
VIDEO PLAYED at LINK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQIMGV5vtd4
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Disruption
Swarms
1. J. Arquilla, D. Ronfeldt,
RAND: “Swarming & the future
Conflict”.
1. J. Arquilla, D. Ronfeldt, RAND: “Swarming & the future Conflict”.
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Swarms
Military Applications
BACKGROUND
Innovation,Automation& Jobs
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Motivation
Google Cars are super Cautious
SOURCE: http://theoatmeal.com/blog/google_self_driving_car
SOURCE: http://www.google.com/images
GEEK HUMOUR
ENDLESS DOWHILE LOOP
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Motivation
Google Cars Sensors
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Motivation
Google Cars Sensors
VLP-64 LIDAR on Google Car
Flow Down Benefit: VLP-16 –LiDAR Puck:
• 16-channel real-time
• $7,999
• 600 grams.
• Range: 300m
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Motivation
Google Cars Sensors
Radar System
• Information fused with LIDAR
• 24GHz
• 300 metres Range
• Positioned on Bumper at front and red sides
Used for:
• Detecting oncoming vehicles parameters
• Self parking
• blind spot detection
• Pre-cash avoidance
”It’s not competition which counts, but competition from the new commodity, new
technology, new source of supply, new type of organisation - competition which
commands a decisive cost or quality advantage and which strikes not at the profit
margins and outputs of the existing firms but at their very foundations”: Joseph Schumpeter
”It’s not competition which counts, but competition from the new commodity, new
technology, new source of supply, new type of organisation - competition which
commands a decisive cost or quality advantage and which strikes not at the profit
margins and outputs of the existing firms but at their very foundations”: Joseph Schumpeter
Source: http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/the-robots-are-coming-to-take-your-job/
”It’s not competition which counts, but competition from the new commodity, new
technology, new source of supply, new type of organisation - competition which
commands a decisive cost or quality advantage and which strikes not at the profit
margins and outputs of the existing firms but at their very foundations”: Joseph Schumpeter
NYT Best Seller:
• Increased impact of automation
Source: http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/the-robots-are-coming-to-take-your-job/
”It’s not competition which counts, but competition from the new commodity, new
technology, new source of supply, new type of organisation - competition which
commands a decisive cost or quality advantage and which strikes not at the profit
margins and outputs of the existing firms but at their very foundations”: Joseph Schumpeter
NYT Best Seller:
• Increased impact of automation
Moving from
”Smokestack & Manufacturing Economies”
to
”Consumption, Services and HighValue
Technologies”
The GOOD
The BADThe GOOD
The BADThe GOOD
There will be
WINNERS
&
LOSERS
The BADThe GOOD
Companies
&
Cities
&
Nations
There will be
WINNERS
&
LOSERS
The BADThe GOOD
Companies
&
Cities
&
Nations
There will be
WINNERS
&
LOSERS
How is Australia positioned?
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Osborne & Frey, Citigroup
Studies by : Carl Frey & Michael Osborne, then Citigroup
• Advances in AI, Robotics, Data Mining, Machine Learning,
Computational Statistics are placing more jobs at Risk of being
Automated. High risk for
• United States- 47% of workers
• China - 77% of workers
• India - 69% of workers
• Automation may change the trend of offshoring to low cost regions
• Less low end manufacturing, more innovative technology
development
• Emerging Markets need to diversify to move up the value chain
High Risk of Jobs being Replaced by Automation
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Computerisation & Jobs Market
Next Decades
Source: Frey, Carl Benedikt and Michael Osborne. September 17, 2013. The Future of Employment: How
Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation? University of Oxford
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Computerisation & Jobs Market
Next Decades
Management
Engineering/
Science
Education, Law,
Arts, Media
Healthcare
Source: Frey, Carl Benedikt and Michael Osborne. September 17, 2013. The Future of Employment: How
Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation? University of Oxford
LOW RISK
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Computerisation & Jobs Market
Next Decades
Management
Engineering/
Science
Education, Law,
Arts, Media
Healthcare
Installation,
Maintenance
Source: Frey, Carl Benedikt and Michael Osborne. September 17, 2013. The Future of Employment: How
Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation? University of Oxford
LOW RISK MEDIUM RISK
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Computerisation & Jobs Market
Next Decades
Management
Engineering/
Science
Education, Law,
Arts, Media
Healthcare
Service
Sales
Office and
admin.
support
Installation,
Maintenance
Source: Frey, Carl Benedikt and Michael Osborne. September 17, 2013. The Future of Employment: How
Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation? University of Oxford
LOW RISK MEDIUM RISK HIGH RISK
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Computerisation & Jobs Market
Next Decades
Management
Engineering/
Science
Education, Law,
Arts, Media
Healthcare
Service
Sales
Office and
admin.
support
Transportation
Installation,
Maintenance
Source: Frey, Carl Benedikt and Michael Osborne. September 17, 2013. The Future of Employment: How
Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation? University of Oxford
LOW RISK MEDIUM RISK HIGH RISK
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Disruption, Automation and Innovation
Percentage of Jobs at High Risk of Automation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Disruption, Automation and Innovation
Percentage of Jobs at High Risk of Automation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Least at Risk
• Technically Dynamic, Knowledge Centres
• Diversified & skill intensive workforces
• Professional Services
• Creative Industries
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Disruption, Automation and Innovation
Percentage of Jobs at High Risk of Automation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Least at Risk
• Technically Dynamic, Knowledge Centres
• Diversified & skill intensive workforces
• Professional Services
• Creative Industries
Most at Risk
• Manufacturing, Energy
• Banking
• Gaming, Low Level white & Blue collar
City State % Jobs at
Risk
Kurri Kurri NSW 58.6
Murray Bridge SA 57.3
Cessnock NSW 57.1
Melton VIC 56.8
Muswellbrook NSW 56.4
Warwick QLD 56.4
Port Pirie SA 55.3%
Griffith QLD 55.3
Colac VIC 54.9
Moe-Newborough VIC 54.7
SOURCE: Bernard Salt, KPMG
Disruption, Automation and Innovation
Percentage of Jobs at High Risk of Automation: Australia
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Innovations
Ageing Corporations
Source: http://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/corporate-
australias-real-problem-ancient-companies-20151125-gl7wu2.html
“Innovation, by it's very nature,
involves taking risks.
“I'm not sure an anchor tenant that is a 105-
year old company is going to attract start-ups
and venture capital to create a tech hub”,
Scott Farquar, Co-Founder Atlassian
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Ageing Corporations
United States
89%
11%
US Market Capitilisation by Company
Age 2005
Over 85 Years
Old
Microsoft
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Ageing Corporations
United States
89%
11%
US Market Capitilisation by Company
Age 2005
Over 85 Years
Old
Microsoft
18%
14%
11%
8%8%
41%
US Market Capitalisation by Company
Age 2015
Apple
Google
Microsoft
Amazon
Facebook
Over 50 Years Old
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
11%
7%
6%
76%
AUS Market Capitalisation by
Company Age 2005
Westpac
Westfield
Telstra
Aging Corporations
Australia
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
11%
7%
6%
76%
AUS Market Capitalisation by
Company Age 2005
Westpac
Westfield
Telstra
Aging Corporations
Australia
8%
92%
AUS Market Capitalisation by
Company Age 2015
Telstra
Over 85
Years Old
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
11%
7%
6%
76%
AUS Market Capitalisation by
Company Age 2005
Westpac
Westfield
Telstra
Aging Corporations
Australia
8%
92%
AUS Market Capitalisation by
Company Age 2015
Telstra
Over 85
Years Old
Dominated by
Banks
Supermarket
&
Commodities
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Which Businesses Creates Jobs?
Kauffman foundation
• “Existing firms actually lose a million more jobs, per year, then they create.”
• Over last 25 years, almost all private sector jobs are created by businesses less than 5 years old
• Between 1988 & 2011, companies more than 5 years old, DESTROYED more jobs than they create
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Which Businesses Creates Jobs?
Kauffman foundation
• “Existing firms actually lose a million more jobs, per year, then they create.”
• Over last 25 years, almost all private sector jobs are created by businesses less than 5 years old
• Between 1988 & 2011, companies more than 5 years old, DESTROYED more jobs than they create
US Bureau of Economic Research
• “The younger companies are, the more jobs they create, regardless of size”
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Which Businesses Creates Jobs?
Kauffman foundation
• “Existing firms actually lose a million more jobs, per year, then they create.”
• Over last 25 years, almost all private sector jobs are created by businesses less than 5 years old
• Between 1988 & 2011, companies more than 5 years old, DESTROYED more jobs than they create
US Bureau of Economic Research
• “The younger companies are, the more jobs they create, regardless of size”
Washington Post
• “Once large enough, firms start hunting overseas for cheaper labour options”,
• “Small companies produce 16 time more patents per worker than large firms”, and
this is typically associated with an infusion of jobs creation,
• Level of jobs creation linked to level of R&D, and collaboration
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Ageing Corporations
Comparison
89%
11%
US Market Capitilisation by Company
Age 2005
Over 85 Years
Old
Microsoft
11%
7%
6%
76%
AUS Market Capitalisation by
Company Age 2005
Westpac
Westfield
Telstra
Over 80 Years Old
8%
92%
AUS Market Capitalisation by
Company Age 2015
Telstra
Over 85
Years Old
18%
14%
11%
8%8%
41%
US Market Capitalisation by Company
Age 2015
Apple
Google
Microsoft
Amazon
Facebook
Over 41 Years Old
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Ageing Corporations
Comparison
89%
11%
US Market Capitilisation by Company
Age 2005
Over 85 Years
Old
Microsoft
11%
7%
6%
76%
AUS Market Capitalisation by
Company Age 2005
Westpac
Westfield
Telstra
Over 80 Years Old
8%
92%
AUS Market Capitalisation by
Company Age 2015
Telstra
Over 85
Years Old
18%
14%
11%
8%8%
41%
US Market Capitalisation by Company
Age 2015
Apple
Google
Microsoft
Amazon
Facebook
Over 41 Years Old
Corporate Australia is
• “Ancient” with slow moving inertia
• "deeply risk-averse" and "dominated by rent-seeking oligopolists“,
which is increasingly troubles our policy makers., Fairfax
Media's Jessica Irvine
Old, large corporations become increasingly risk averse over their life
spans. They rise to the challenge of innovative competitors by putting larger
barriers in place rather than innovating themselves.
Look at the behaviour of the coal industry, supermarkets and the taxi industry all
trying to get the government to make it more difficult for new entrants”
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Our Banking & Real Estate Sector
Australia's banking sector has a high reliance on overseas funding.
• Underpins the funding for our real estate market
Our 1 trillion foreign debt
• twice the size of our income from exports, dividends and royalties
• This ratio more than any other country except Greece & US
• Oz is spending 5.6% of its foreign income meeting interest payments, more than any other advanced
country aside from Spain and at similar levels to Mexico
• Credit ratings agency considering loweringAustralia's rating from AAA
• Concern that if global financial market lose confidence in Australia, it will be difficult for government and
banks to refinance Debt
The Australian Newspaper 12 May 2016
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Supporting Innovation
Ingredients of supportive business ecosystem for innovation & job creation[1]:
• A pro-entrepreneurship culture
• Guidance from experienced entrepreneurs
• A supportive Regulatory Environment
• A collaborative Business Culture
• Visible Successes & Role Models
• RiskTolerance
• Available Capital
• Technical Skills
Key Ingredients for Innovation & Start-ups
[1] Startup AUS Crossroads 2015: http://startupaus.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Crossroads-2015.pdf
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Summary So Far
• Concerning signs that Australian Economy is skewed with Aging Companies,
• Government push for Innovation
• UAVs offering up great potential, …. maybe even some jobs
• Key to Innovation is the right conditions, INCLUDING a supportive
Regulatory BODY
• Supportive DOES NOT MEAN bypassing safety
BACKGROUND
RegulatoryStatusUpdate
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
The Australian Framework
RPAS Regulation Updates
• CASR Part 101: Commenced 1 July 2002
• CASA reviewing & modernising CASR Part 101
• Phase 1:
• Amendments to CASR Part 101 to be in Force Sep 2016
• Incorporates new framework derived from EASA
• Suite of Advisory Circulars under development
• Developing Manual of Standards
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
The Australian Framework
Australia: “Close Following”
Certified Specific Open
Restricted Specific Small RPAS Very small RPAS Toys
European Approach
Australian Draft Framework
Regulated Specific Open
Standard Restricted Specific Limited Small RPAS Very small RPAS
EASA CONOPS: safe, proportional and operation-centric approach.
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
The Australian Framework
RPAS Regulation Updates
• CASR Part 101: Commenced 1 July 2002
• CASA reviewing & modernising CASR Part 101
• Phase 1:
• Amendments to CASR Part 101 to be in Force Sep 2016
• Incorporates hooks for new framework derived from
EASA
• Suite of Advisory Circulars under development
• Developing Manual of Standards
• Phase 2: complete re-write of RPAS
regulation  CASR Part 102
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Regulated Specific
Open
Small RPAS Very small RPAS
Element of
Initial
Airworthiness
CPA like
Oversight of
Integrity. NAA
led
Industry Appointed
Oversight No Integrity Oversight
Operational
Restrictions
CASA Airworthiness Framework
Operational Airworthiness
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Regulated Specific
Open
Small RPAS Very small RPAS
Element of
Initial
Airworthiness
CPA like
Oversight of
Integrity. NAA
led
Industry Appointed
Oversight No Integrity Oversight
Operational
Restrictions
Proportionate &SAFE: Operational Restrictions commensurate
with technical integrity & operational environment
CASA Airworthiness Framework
Operational Airworthiness
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Regulated Specific
Open
Small RPAS Very small RPAS
Element of
Initial
Airworthiness
CPA like
Oversight of
Integrity. NAA
led
Industry Appointed
Oversight No Integrity Oversight
Operational
Restrictions
Enter the US Element
Derivative of US sUAS
NPRM
CASA Airworthiness Framework
Operational Airworthiness
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Regulated Specific
Open
Small RPAS Very small RPAS
Element of
Initial
Airworthiness
CPA like
Oversight of
Integrity. NAA
led
Industry Appointed
Oversight No Integrity Oversight
Operational
Restrictions
Enter the US Element
Derivative of US sUAS
NPRM
Open = Small SegregatedVLOS Container
CASA Airworthiness Framework
Operational Airworthiness
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Regulated Specific
Open
Small RPAS Very small RPAS
Element of
Initial
Airworthiness
No Integrity Oversight
Operational
Restrictions
 Line of Sight operations only
 DAYVFR
 Below 400 ft AGL
 limited levels of autonomy permissible but must be able to override
• MTOM ≤ 25kg
• V < 87 KCAS
• Qualified Operator
• Not over people
• MTOM ≤ 2kg
 V < 30 KCAS
 Frangible Materials
 Operations over people allowed
CASA Airworthiness Framework
Operational Airworthiness
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CONOPS Consideration Standard Restricted Specific Limited
Over population etc
Controlled Airspace
BVLOS
IFR Conditions
Above 400 feet AGL
Within 3 NM of Aerodrome
The Australian Framework
Work Outstanding
Regulated Specific
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CONOPS Consideration Standard Restricted Specific Limited
Over population etc
Controlled Airspace
BVLOS
IFR Conditions
Above 400 feet AGL
Within 3 NM of Aerodrome
The Australian Framework
Work Outstanding
Regulated Specific
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CONOPS Consideration Standard Restricted Specific Limited
Over population etc
Controlled Airspace
BVLOS
IFR Conditions
Above 400 feet AGL
Within 3 NM of Aerodrome
Airworthiness Expectations based on CPA Regulations e.g.TC/CoA
The Australian Framework
Work Outstanding
Regulated Specific
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CONOPS Consideration Standard Restricted Specific Limited
Over population etc
Controlled Airspace
BVLOS
IFR Conditions
Above 400 feet AGL
Within 3 NM of Aerodrome
The Australian Framework
Work Outstanding
Regulated Specific
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CONOPS Consideration Standard Restricted Specific Limited
Over population etc
Controlled Airspace
BVLOS
IFR Conditions
Above 400 feet AGL
Within 3 NM of Aerodrome
The Australian Framework
Work Outstanding
Regulated Specific
Work to be done
• What Equipment
• What Restrictions
• What Procedures
• WhatTraining
• How is RISK Assessed?
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CONOPS Consideration Standard Restricted Specific Limited
Over population etc
Controlled Airspace
BVLOS
IFR Conditions
Above 400 feet AGL
Within 3 NM of Aerodrome
The Australian Framework
Work Outstanding
Regulated Specific
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CONOPS Consideration Standard Restricted Specific Limited
Over population etc
Controlled Airspace
BVLOS
IFR Conditions
Above 400 feet AGL
Within 3 NM of Aerodrome
The Australian Framework
Work Outstanding
Regulated Specific
Operational
Flexibility
Platform
Technical
Integrity
Equipage
Operator
Competence
KEYPROBLEMS
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Key Problems
• Accelerated Regulatory Development needs a Cultural Change
• Lack of Roadmap
• More People with the right skills
• Uncertainty/Disagreement around Scope ofWork
Summary of Issues
KEYPROBLEMS
ChangingtheCulture
“If you always do what you always did, you always get what
you always got”,….or
Definition of insanity…….you know the rest!
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Key Problems
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Key Problems
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
No Consultation,
Too Many Surprises
NoTransparent
Vision or Plan
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Key Problems
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
No Consultation,
Too Many Surprises
Industry
Disengagement
NoTransparent
Vision or Plan
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
No
Consultation,
Too Many
Surprises
Industry
Disengagement
NoTransparent
Vision or Plan
Key Problem
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
Communication andTrust.
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
No
Consultation,
Too Many
Surprises
Fragmented
Availability
Industry
Disengagement
NoTransparent
Vision or Plan
Key Problem
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
UASSC
Observers/Workers
Industry has DAY JOBS
Communication andTrust.
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
No
Consultation,
Too Many
Surprises
Volunteer
Workforce
Fragmented
Availability
Industry
Disengagement
NoTransparent
Vision or Plan
Key Problem
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
UASSC
Observers/Workers
Industry has DAY JOBS
Communication andTrust.
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
No
Consultation,
Too Many
Surprises
Volunteer
Workforce
Fragmented
Availability
Industry
Disengagement
NoTransparent
Vision or Plan
Limited,
unreliable
Industry
Contribution
Key Problem
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
UASSC
Observers/Workers
Industry has DAY JOBS
Communication andTrust.
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
No
Consultation,
Too Many
Surprises
Volunteer
Workforce
Fragmented
Availability
Industry
Disengagement
NoTransparent
Vision or Plan
Limited,
unreliable
Industry
Contribution
Reduced
Overall
Workforce
Key Problem
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
UASSC
Observers/Workers
Industry has DAY JOBS
Communication andTrust.
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
No
Consultation,
Too Many
Surprises
Volunteer
Workforce
Fragmented
Availability
Fragmented
&/or Delayed
Feedback
Industry
Disengagement
NoTransparent
Vision or Plan
Limited,
unreliable
Industry
Contribution
Reduced
Overall
Workforce
Key Problem
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
UASSC
Observers/Workers
Industry has DAY JOBS
Communication andTrust.
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Industry
Disengagement
Reduced
Overall
Workforce
Key Problem
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CASA:
Limited
Workforce
Industry
Disengagement
Reduced
Overall
Workforce
Key Problem
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CASA:
Limited
Workforce
CASA: Management &
Public Expectations
Industry
Disengagement
Deadlines
Reduced
Overall
Workforce
Key Problem
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CASA:
Limited
Workforce
CASA: Management &
Public Expectations
Industry
Disengagement
CASA:
Time Poor
Deadlines
Reduced
Overall
Workforce
Key Problem
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CASA:
Limited
Workforce
CASA: Management &
Public Expectations
Industry
Disengagement
CASA:
Time Poor
Deadlines
Reduced
Overall
Workforce
Fragmented
&/or Delayed
Feedback
Key Problem
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CASA:
Limited
Workforce
CASA: Management &
Public Expectations
Industry
Disengagement
CASA:
Time Poor
Deadlines
Reduced
Overall
Workforce
Loadshed,
shortcuts,
Bypass
Fragmented
&/or Delayed
Feedback
Key Problem
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CASA:
Limited
Workforce
CASA: Management &
Public Expectations
Industry
Disengagement
CASA:
Time Poor
Deadlines
Reduced
Overall
Workforce
Loadshed,
shortcuts,
Bypass
High Latency
Doc
Development
Fragmented
&/or Delayed
Feedback
Key Problem
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CASA: Limited
Workforce
CASA: Management &
Public Expectations
Fragmented &/or
Delayed Feedback
CASA:
Time Poor
Deadlines
Reduced
Overall
Workforce
Loadshed,
shortcuts,
Bypass
High Latency Doc
Development
Key Complaints
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CASA: Limited
Workforce
CASA: Management &
Public Expectations
Reduced
Consultation
Fragmented &/or
Delayed Feedback
CASA:
Time Poor
Deadlines
Reduced
Overall
Workforce
Loadshed,
shortcuts,
Bypass
High Latency Doc
Development
Key Complaints
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
No Consultation,
Too Many Surprises
CASA: Limited
Workforce
CASA: Management &
Public Expectations
Reduced
Consultation
Fragmented &/or
Delayed Feedback
CASA:
Time Poor
Deadlines
Reduced
Overall
Workforce
Loadshed,
shortcuts,
Bypass
High Latency Doc
Development
Negative
Reinforcement
Key Complaints
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
No Consultation,
Too Many Surprises
CASA: Limited
Workforce
CASA: Management &
Public Expectations
Reduced
Consultation
Fragmented &/or
Delayed Feedback
CASA:
Time Poor
Deadlines
Reduced
Overall
Workforce
Loadshed,
shortcuts,
Bypass
High Latency Doc
Development
Industry
Disengagement
Negative
Reinforcement
Negative Reinforcement
Key Complaints
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
No Consultation,
Too Many Surprises
CASA: Limited
Workforce
CASA: Management &
Public Expectations
Reduced
Consultation
Fragmented &/or
Delayed Feedback
Limited,
unreliable
Industry
Contribution
CASA:
Time Poor
Deadlines
Reduced
Overall
Workforce
Loadshed,
shortcuts,
Bypass
High Latency Doc
Development
Industry
Disengagement
Negative
Reinforcement
Negative Reinforcement
Negative
Reinforcement
Negative
Reinforcement
Negative
Reinforcement
Key Complaints
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
No Consultation,
Too Many Surprises
CASA: Limited
Workforce
CASA: Management &
Public Expectations
Reduced
Consultation
Fragmented &/or
Delayed Feedback
Limited,
unreliable
Industry
Contribution
CASA:
Time Poor
Deadlines
Reduced
Overall
Workforce
Loadshed,
shortcuts,
Bypass
High Latency Doc
Development
Industry
Disengagement
Negative
Reinforcement
Negative Reinforcement
Negative
Reinforcement
Negative
Reinforcement
Negative
Reinforcement
Negative
Reinforcement
Negative
Reinforcement
Negative
Reinforcement
Negative
Reinforcement
Key Complaints
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
No Consultation,
Too Many Surprises
CASA: Limited
Workforce
CASA: Management &
Public Expectations
Reduced
Consultation
Fragmented &/or
Delayed Feedback
Limited,
unreliable
Industry
Contribution
CASA:
Time Poor
Deadlines
Reduced
Overall
Workforce
Loadshed,
shortcuts,
Bypass
High Latency Doc
Development
Industry
Disengagement
Negative
Reinforcement
Negative Reinforcement
Negative
Reinforcement
Negative
Reinforcement
Negative
Reinforcement
Negative
Reinforcement
Negative
Reinforcement
Negative
Reinforcement
Negative
Reinforcement
Key Complaints
CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
TRUST
COMMUNICATION
SHORT-TERM ACTIONS
A LONGTERM PLAN
KEYPROBLEMS
ThelackofaRoadmap
KEYPROBLEMS
ThelackofaRoadmap
“AVision without a plan is just a dream”
A plan without people….again a dream!
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Key Problem
The Lack of a Roadmap
• Industry want to start BVLOS, …..Soon
• Current rate of progress not satisfactory if we want to maximise benefits
for country
• Potential Investors lose confidence: take their money elsewhere
• Regulatory INACTION has a real price for our nation
• First Moving Nations gain a competitive edge:
• Setup right Environment for Innovation The Crossroads
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Key Problem
The Lack of a Roadmap: The Crossroads
The Crossroads
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Key Problem
The Lack of a Roadmap: The Crossroads
The Crossroads
CASA Resources are finite  Insufficient to examine all the elements that go
into integrating UAS into NAS
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Key Problem
The Lack of a Roadmap: The Crossroads
The Crossroads
CASA Resources are finite  Insufficient to examine all the elements that go
into integrating UAS into NAS
Adopted Close Follower Approach BUT beholden to European timeframes
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Key Problem
The Lack of a Roadmap: The Crossroads
The Crossroads
CASA Resources are finite  Insufficient to examine all the elements that go
into integrating UAS into NAS
Adopted Close Follower Approach BUT beholden to European timeframes
US and Europe both have publically available
Roadmaps & Plan.
Australia does not!
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Key Problem
The Lack of a Roadmap: The Crossroads
The Crossroads
CASA Resources are finite  Insufficient to examine all the elements that go
into integrating UAS into NAS
Adopted Close Follower Approach BUT beholden to European timeframes
What elements will be Australianised?
• Australian specific safety implications,
• Economic priorities,
• Technical areas of uncertainty R&D we must perform
• Gaps in national capacity
US and Europe both have publically available
Roadmaps & Plan.
Australia does not!
KEYPROBLEMS
Uncertainty
about
ScopeofWork
BVLOS
BVLOS
SEGREGATION is a tenuous Strategy for BVLOS
NOTAMS ……Really ???
BVLOS
SEGREGATION is a tenuous Strategy for BVLOS
NOTAMS ……Really ???
BVLOS
SEGREGATION is a tenuous Strategy for BVLOS
NOTAMS ……Really ???
ATM and Airspace Integration
Operational contingency procedures and systems
Data communication links incl. spectrum issues
Detect & Avoid systems
Methodology for Determining Risk
BVLOS
SEGREGATION is a tenuous Strategy for BVLOS
NOTAMS ……Really ???
Oh ….
And Integrity Requirements for flight over people
BVLOS
SEGREGATION is a tenuous Strategy for BVLOS
NOTAMS ……Really ???
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Uncertainty about Scope of Work
Close Following
Certified Specific Open
Restricted Specific Small RPAS Very small RPAS Toys
European Approach
Australian Draft Framework
Regulated Specific Open
Standard Restricted Specific Limited Small RPAS Very small RPAS
EASA CONOPS: safe, proportional and operation-centric approach.
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Uncertainty about Scope of Work
Roadmap identifies all the issues necessary to integrate RPAS into
the NAS and established a step by step process.
Includes 3 Annexes:
• Annex A- Regulatory Approach:
• Identifies improvements to existing regulatory framework
• Annex B- Strategic Research Plan
• Identifies technology enablers and necessary R&D
• Annex C- Study on Societal Impact
The European Exemplar
Goals
Milestones
Gaps & Barriers
Action Items
Priorities &Timelines
A vision without a plan is just a dream, …
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
EC 1
Justify &
Validate RPAS
Safety
Objective
EC 2
Secure C2,
Datalinks &
Bandwidth
EC 3
RPAS
Integration into
ATM,
DAA and SA
EC 4
Security
EC 5
Safe
Automation &
Predictable
Behaviours
EC 6
Automated
Take Off &
Landing,
Surface
Operations
European Roadmap: Annex B
Understanding the Scope of Work
EC 1
Justify &Validate RPAS
Safety Objective
EC 2 EC 4 EC 5 EC 6EC 3
EC 1.1
Validation Current
ATM suitability
EC 1
Justify &Validate RPAS
Safety Objective
EC 2 EC 4 EC 5 EC 6EC 3
EC 1.1
Validation Current
ATM suitability
EC 1.2
LongTerm
Validation
Future ATM
compatibility
EC 1.1
Validation Current
ATM suitability
EC 1
Justify &Validate RPAS
Safety Objective
EC 2 EC 4 EC 5 EC 6EC 3
EC 1.1
Validation Current
ATM suitability
EC 1.2
LongTerm
Validation
Future ATM
compatibility
Minimum Safety
Objectives
In CTAOver People OCTA
Separation
Collision
Avoidance
Comms
Trials &
Demos
EC 1
Justify &Validate RPAS
Safety Objective
EC 2 EC 4 EC 5 EC 6EC 3
EC 1.2
LongTerm ATM
Compatibility
EC 1.1
Validation Current
ATM suitability
EC 1
Justify &Validate RPAS
Safety Objective
EC 2 EC 4 EC 5 EC 6EC 3
EC 1.2
LongTerm ATM
Compatibility
EC 1.1
Validation Current
ATM suitability
Conflict
Management
Traffic
Avoidance
Collision
Avoidance
Communication Navigation ADS-B
Ops in
CTA &
OCTA
EC 2
Secure C2, Datalinks &
Bandwidth
EC 2 EC 4 EC 5 EC 6EC 3
EC 2
Secure C2, Datalinks &
Bandwidth
EC 2 EC 4 EC 5 EC 6EC 3
EC 2.2
RLOS & BRLOS
Infrastructure
EC 2.1
Secure C2 Systems
& Links
EC 2.3
Radio Bandwidth
Management
EC 2
Secure C2, Datalinks &
Bandwidth
EC 2 EC 4 EC 5 EC 6EC 3
EC 2.2
RLOS & BRLOS
Infrastructure
EC 2.1
Secure C2 Systems
& Links
Satellite BRLOS
Aerial Relay
BRLOS
Ground
Network
Range
Extension
Data Rates,
Frequency
bandwidths
Redundancy
On-board
Equipment
Requirements
Antennas
EC 2.3
Radio Bandwidth
Management
Spectrum
Availability
DAA
Impact &
QoS
Standardisation
EC 3
RPAS Integration into
ATM, DAA & Situational
Awareness
EC 2 EC 4 EC 5 EC 6EC 2
EC 3.1
ATM Interfaces
for NextGen,
SESAR,
OneSky
EC 3.1
ATM Interfaces
& Ops where
Aircraft are
Cooperative
4-D Mission
Trajectory
ADS-B
GNSS
Datalinks
EC 3.3
Airborne
DAA
DAA, C2,
Avionics
Integration
DAA
Performance
in OCTA
DAA for
Small UAVs
TLS for
Immature DAA
Solutions
EC 3.4
Ground
DAA
EC 3.5
GCS
HMI
EC 3.6
Obstacles
EC 3.7
Weather
EC 3.8
UAV
Detectability
EC 3.9
Pilot &
Observer
Respons.
EC 3.10
Other
Hazards
And on, and on , and on……
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Uncertainty about Scope of Work
Europe: Copying their Homework
Goals
Milestones
Gaps & Barriers
Task List
Priorities,Timelines, People
Operational & Technology gaps:
1. Integration into ATM and Airspace
environments
2. Surface operations incl. take-off and landing
3. Operational contingency procedures and
systems
4. Data communication links incl. spectrum
issues
5. Detect & Avoid systems and operational
procedures
6. Security issues
7. Verification and Validation Methods
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Uncertainty about Scope of Work
United States Identified R&D Areas/Gaps
Airspace Operations
• Develop Integrated Separation Concepts
• Develop Airspace Integration Safety Cases
• Develop SAA Sensors & Fusion Requires
• Develop Separation Algorithms
• AssessAvailability/Quality of Surveillance Data
• Safe and EfficientTerminal Airspace & Surface
Operations
Unmanned Aircraft
• State Awareness and RealTime Mission
Management
• Airframe Certification
• Precise Location & Navigation
• UAS Avionics & Control Systems
Certification
Communications
• Impact of UAS Ops on NextGen comms systems
• Availability of UAS Control frequency Spectrum
• Develop &Validate UAS Control System
Performance Requirement
• Ensure security of safety critical comms with civil
UAS
• Design & Develop UAS Control Datalink for
allocated frequency spectrum bands
Human Systems Integration
• DisplayTraffic/airspace information
• Effective Human Automation Interaction
• Pilot Centric GCS
• Definition Roles and Responsibilities
• Predictability & Contingency Mgt
• System Level Issues
• Support for Future Capability of UAS
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Uncertainty about Scope of Work
Europe: Technology and Operational Gaps
Operational & Technology
gaps:
1. Integration into ATM and Airspace
environments
2. Surface operations incl. take-off and
landing
3. Operational contingency procedures
and systems
4. Data communication links incl.
spectrum issues
5. Detect & Avoid systems and
operational procedures
6. Security issues
7. Verification and Validation Methods
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Uncertainty about Scope of Work
Europe: Technology and Operational Gaps
14 Key R&D Activities:
• EVLOS/VLOS
• 1.RPAS activities awareness for security
• 2. Operations in Urban Areas
• 3. Human Factors
• IFR/VFR
• 4. Visual Detectability solutions
• 5. DAA
• 6. Comms C2 Datalink
• 7. Airspace & Airport Access
• 8 Contingency
• BVLOS
• 9. DAA
• 10. Comms C2 Datalink
• 11 Airspace & Airport Access
• 12. Security
• 13 Human Factors: BVLOS & IFR/VFR
• 14 Best Practice Demonstration
GAPS LINKED
TO
ACTION
&
MILESTONES
Operational & Technology
gaps:
1. Integration into ATM and Airspace
environments
2. Surface operations incl. take-off and
landing
3. Operational contingency procedures
and systems
4. Data communication links incl.
spectrum issues
5. Detect & Avoid systems and
operational procedures
6. Security issues
7. Verification and Validation Methods
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Uncertainty about Scope of Work
Europe: Technology and Operational Gaps
14 Key R&D Activities:
• EVLOS/VLOS
• 1.RPAS activities awareness for security
• 2. Operations in Urban Areas
• 3. Human Factors
• IFR/VFR
• 4. Visual Detectability solutions
• 5. DAA
• 6. Comms C2 Datalink
• 7. Airspace & Airport Access
• 8 Contingency
• BVLOS
• 9. DAA
• 10. Comms C2 Datalink
• 11 Airspace & Airport Access
• 12. Security
• 13 Human Factors: BVLOS & IFR/VFR
• 14 Best Practice Demonstration
GAPS LINKED
TO
ACTION
&
MILESTONES
Operational & Technology
gaps:
1. Integration into ATM and Airspace
environments
2. Surface operations incl. take-off and
landing
3. Operational contingency procedures
and systems
4. Data communication links incl.
spectrum issues
5. Detect & Avoid systems and
operational procedures
6. Security issues
7. Verification and Validation Methods
Timelines &
Difficulty
Identified
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Uncertainty about Scope of Work
Europe: Technology and Operational Gaps
14 Key R&D Activities:
• EVLOS/VLOS
• 1.RPAS activities awareness for security
• 2. Operations in Urban Areas
• 3. Human Factors
• IFR/VFR
• 4. Visual Detectability solutions
• 5. DAA
• 6. Comms C2 Datalink
• 7. Airspace & Airport Access
• 8 Contingency
• BVLOS
• 9. DAA
• 10. Comms C2 Datalink
• 11 Airspace & Airport Access
• 12. Security
• 13 Human Factors: BVLOS & IFR/VFR
• 14 Best Practice Demonstration
GAPS LINKED
TO
ACTION
&
MILESTONES
Operational & Technology
gaps:
1. Integration into ATM and Airspace
environments
2. Surface operations incl. take-off and
landing
3. Operational contingency procedures
and systems
4. Data communication links incl.
spectrum issues
5. Detect & Avoid systems and
operational procedures
6. Security issues
7. Verification and Validation Methods
Timelines &
Difficulty
Identified
Re-OccurringThemes
• Detect & Avoid
• CNPC
• ATM
• Human Factors
• Risk & Safety Management
• Training
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Uncertainty about Scope of Work
The European Exemplar: Milestones, Priorities & Timelines
5.VFR
4. IFR
3.
BVLOS
2.
EVLOS
1.VLOS
Priorities: Identifies 5 types of Operations:
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2023 2028
TimelinesMilestones
Initial
Integration
Evolution
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Uncertainty about Scope of Work
European Strategic R& D
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Uncertainty about Scope of Work
European Roadmap: Breakdown for each Activity
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Uncertainty about Scope of Work
European Roadmap: Breakdown for each Activity
RelatedTechnology Gaps: BVLOS
DAA
• EC Gap 3.3 Airborne DAA
• EC Gap 3.4 Ground DAA
• EC 3.8 Ground & Obstacle Avoidance
• EC Gap 3.7Weather Detection
• EC Gap 3.8 Detectability Solutions
• EC Gap 3.10 Other Hazards
Activity
Related technology Gaps
Context & Objectives
Descriptions
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Uncertainty about Scope of Work
European Roadmap: Breakdown for each Activity
RelatedTechnology Gaps: BVLOS
DAA
• EC Gap 3.3 Airborne DAA
• EC Gap 3.4 Ground DAA
• EC 3.8 Ground & Obstacle Avoidance
• EC Gap 3.7Weather Detection
• EC Gap 3.8 Detectability Solutions
• EC Gap 3.10 Other Hazards
Dependencies
• DAA System Compatibility
• Barometric System
• TCAS/ACAS
• ATM System Other Hazards
Activity
Related technology Gaps
Context & Objectives
Descriptions
SESAR Implications
Deliverables
Key Dependencies
Planning:WBS & Schedule
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Uncertainty about Scope of Work
European Roadmap: Breakdown for each Activity
RelatedTechnology Gaps: BVLOS
DAA
• EC Gap 3.3 Airborne DAA
• EC Gap 3.4 Ground DAA
• EC 3.8 Ground & Obstacle Avoidance
• EC Gap 3.7Weather Detection
• EC Gap 3.8 Detectability Solutions
• EC Gap 3.10 Other Hazards
Dependencies
• DAA System Compatibility
• Barometric System
• TCAS/ACAS
• ATM System Other Hazards
Required Expertise: DAA
• Sensors (Cooperative & Non-
Cooperative)
• Sensor Integration, Blending, target
tracking
• System Architectures
• Separation & Avoidance Logic,
ACAS Logic
• Operations
• Information Processing
Activity
Related technology Gaps
Context & Objectives
Descriptions
SESAR Implications
Deliverables
Key Dependencies
Planning:WBS & Schedule
Required Expertise
Planning: Risk & opportunities
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Uncertainty about Scope of Work
Activity 14:
• Establishing AvailableTechnologies
• Supporting Industry Development
•Supporting & Prioritising Development whichALSO
helps:
• the Regulatory Body accelerate regulation
• Supports the Collective Good rather than Individual Business
Interests
Demonstrating Best Practice
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Uncertainty about Scope of Work
Activity 14:
• Establishing AvailableTechnologies
• Supporting Industry Development
•Supporting & Prioritising Development whichALSO
helps:
• the Regulatory Body accelerate regulation
• Supports the Collective Good rather than Individual Business
Interests
Demonstrating Best Practice
This will be relevant when I talk about trials
Key Questions
• Do our operational priorities differ from
US/Europe?
Key Questions
• Do our operational priorities differ from
US/Europe?
• Do we understand implications of their
priorities & timelines?
Key Questions
• Do our operational priorities differ from
US/Europe?
• Do we understand implications of their
priorities & timelines?
• Is “Close Following” a conscious decision
or really a “Wait & See” Strategy
• If we don’t want to “close-follow”, how
will the gaps be addressed 
• What is being done to establish answers?
• Who will pay the price?
Operational & Technology
gaps:
1. Integration into ATM and Airspace
environments
2. Surface operations incl. take-off and
landing
3. Operational contingency procedures
and systems
4. Data communication links incl.
spectrum issues
5. Detect & Avoid systems and
operational procedures
6. Security issues
7. Verification and Validation Methods
Key Questions
• Do our operational priorities differ from
US/Europe?
• Do we understand implications of their
priorities & timelines?
• Which parts are relevant to Australia, which
parts are not?
Key Questions
• Do our operational priorities differ from
US/Europe?
• Do we understand implications of their
priorities & timelines?
• Which parts are relevant to Australia, which
parts are not?
• What are our National UAV Priorities?
Key Questions
• Do our operational priorities differ from
US/Europe?
• Do we understand implications of their
priorities & timelines?
• Which parts are relevant to Australia, which
parts are not?
• What are our National UAV Priorities?
• Agriculture, Mining, Emergency Services,…
Key Questions
• Do our operational priorities differ from
US/Europe?
• Do we understand implications of their
priorities & timelines?
• Which parts are relevant to Australia, which
parts are not?
• What are our National UAV Priorities?
• Agriculture, Mining, Emergency Services,…
• EVLOS, BVLOS, IFR/VFR
14 Key R&D Activities:
• EVLOS/VLOS
• 1.RPAS activities awareness for security
• 2. Operations in Urban Areas
• 3. Human Factors
• IFR/VFR
• 4. Visual Detectability solutions
• 5. DAA
• 7. CNPC
• 9. Airspace & Airport Access
• 11 Contingency
• BVLOS
• 6. DAA
• 8. CNPC
• 11 Airspace & Airport Access
• Human Factors:
• 13 BVLOS & IFR/VFR
• 14 Best Practice Demonstration
Key Questions
Key Questions
• Where do we have the skills to:
• Make decisions on what is relevant (C2,
DAA, ATM)
Key Questions
• Where do we have the skills to:
• Make decisions on what is relevant (C2,
DAA, ATM)
Required Expertise: DAA
• Sensors (Cooperative & Non-Cooperative)
• Sensor Integration, Blending, target tracking
• System Architectures
• Separation & Avoidance Logic,ACAS Logic
• Operations
• Information Processing
• Aircraft Performance & Manoevreability
• ATC
Key Questions
• Where do we have the skills to:
• Make decisions on what is relevant (C2,
DAA, ATM)
Required Expertise: DAA
• Sensors (Cooperative & Non-Cooperative)
• Sensor Integration, Blending, target tracking
• System Architectures
• Separation & Avoidance Logic,ACAS Logic
• Operations
• Information Processing
• Aircraft Performance & Manoevreability
• ATC
Required Expertise: CNPC
• DigitalComms
• Terrain, Urban, Obstacle Database Mgt
• Comms, Nav, Surveillance (CNS)
• EM Spectrum Environment & Measurement
• Spectrum Management
• SATCOM Infrastructure
• Small UAVs
• RCP, QoS, Safety & Security
• GNSS
• Modelling & Simulation
• Advanced Control
Key Questions
• Where do we have the skills to:
• Make decisions on what is relevant (C2,
DAA, ATM)
Required Expertise: DAA
• Sensors (Cooperative & Non-Cooperative)
• Sensor Integration, Blending, target tracking
• System Architectures
• Separation & Avoidance Logic,ACAS Logic
• Operations
• Information Processing
• Aircraft Performance & Manoevreability
• ATC
Required Expertise: CNPC
• DigitalComms
• Terrain, Urban, Obstacle Database Mgt
• Comms, Nav, Surveillance (CNS)
• EM Spectrum Environment & Measurement
• Spectrum Management
• SATCOM Infrastructure
• Small UAVs
• RCP, QoS, Safety & Security
• GNSS
• Modelling & Simulation
• Advanced Control
Required Expertise: ATM & Operations
• ATC & ATM Specialists
• Flight Planning
• Knowledge of ATM SurveillanceAssets
• Knowledge of ATC Procedures & Services
• Knowledge of NextGen, SESAR, OneSky
• Operators
• RPA End Users: Pilot & Payload
• Small & Large
• CPA Pilots
• NewTechnologies: Airware, LATAS, UTM
Key Questions
• Where do we have the skills to:
• Make decisions on what is relevant (C2,
DAA, ATM)
• Address particular gaps
Required Expertise: DAA
• Sensors (Cooperative & Non-Cooperative)
• Sensor Integration, Blending, target tracking
• System Architectures
• Separation & Avoidance Logic,ACAS Logic
• Operations
• Information Processing
• Aircraft Performance & Manoevreability
• ATC
Required Expertise: CNPC
• DigitalComms
• Terrain, Urban, Obstacle Database Mgt
• Comms, Nav, Surveillance (CNS)
• EM Spectrum Environment & Measurement
• Spectrum Management
• SATCOM Infrastructure
• Small UAVs
• RCP, QoS, Safety & Security
• GNSS
• Modelling & Simulation
• Advanced Control
Required Expertise: ATM & Operations
• ATC & ATM Specialists
• Flight Planning
• Knowledge of ATM SurveillanceAssets
• Knowledge of ATC Procedures & Services
• Knowledge of NextGen, SESAR, OneSky
• Operators
• RPA End Users: Pilot & Payload
• Small & Large
• CPA Pilots
• NewTechnologies: Airware, LATAS, UTM
Key Questions
• Where do we have the skills to:
• Make decisions on what is relevant (C2,
DAA, ATM)
• Address particular gaps
• Operational Procedure Generation
Required Expertise: DAA
• Sensors (Cooperative & Non-Cooperative)
• Sensor Integration, Blending, target tracking
• System Architectures
• Separation & Avoidance Logic,ACAS Logic
• Operations
• Information Processing
• Aircraft Performance & Manoevreability
• ATC
Required Expertise: CNPC
• DigitalComms
• Terrain, Urban, Obstacle Database Mgt
• Comms, Nav, Surveillance (CNS)
• EM Spectrum Environment & Measurement
• Spectrum Management
• SATCOM Infrastructure
• Small UAVs
• RCP, QoS, Safety & Security
• GNSS
• Modelling & Simulation
• Advanced Control
Required Expertise: ATM & Operations
• ATC & ATM Specialists
• Flight Planning
• Knowledge of ATM SurveillanceAssets
• Knowledge of ATC Procedures & Services
• Knowledge of NextGen, SESAR, OneSky
• Operators
• RPA End Users: Pilot & Payload
• Small & Large
• CPA Pilots
• NewTechnologies: Airware, LATAS, UTM
Key Questions
• Where do we have the skills to:
• Make decisions on what is relevant (C2,
DAA, ATM)
• Address particular gaps
• Operational Procedure Generation
• ATM Integration
• Technology Specification Development
• Technical Solution Development
Required Expertise: DAA
• Sensors (Cooperative & Non-Cooperative)
• Sensor Integration, Blending, target tracking
• System Architectures
• Separation & Avoidance Logic,ACAS Logic
• Operations
• Information Processing
• Aircraft Performance & Manoevreability
• ATC
Required Expertise: CNPC
• DigitalComms
• Terrain, Urban, Obstacle Database Mgt
• Comms, Nav, Surveillance (CNS)
• EM Spectrum Environment & Measurement
• Spectrum Management
• SATCOM Infrastructure
• Small UAVs
• RCP, QoS, Safety & Security
• GNSS
• Modelling & Simulation
• Advanced Control
Required Expertise: ATM & Operations
• ATC & ATM Specialists
• Flight Planning
• Knowledge of ATM SurveillanceAssets
• Knowledge of ATC Procedures & Services
• Knowledge of NextGen, SESAR, OneSky
• Operators
• RPA End Users: Pilot & Payload
• Small & Large
• CPA Pilots
• NewTechnologies: Airware, LATAS, UTM
Key Questions
• Where do we have the skills to:
• Make decisions on what is relevant (C2,
DAA, ATM)
• Address particular gaps
• Operational Procedure Generation
• ATM Integration
• Technology Specification Development
• Technical Solution Development
• Assess Risk & Develop Mitigation when
Solutions not present
Required Expertise: DAA
• Sensors (Cooperative & Non-Cooperative)
• Sensor Integration, Blending, target tracking
• System Architectures
• Separation & Avoidance Logic,ACAS Logic
• Operations
• Information Processing
• Aircraft Performance & Manoevreability
• ATC
Required Expertise: CNPC
• DigitalComms
• Terrain, Urban, Obstacle Database Mgt
• Comms, Nav, Surveillance (CNS)
• EM Spectrum Environment & Measurement
• Spectrum Management
• SATCOM Infrastructure
• Small UAVs
• RCP, QoS, Safety & Security
• GNSS
• Modelling & Simulation
• Advanced Control
Required Expertise: ATM & Operations
• ATC & ATM Specialists
• Flight Planning
• Knowledge of ATM SurveillanceAssets
• Knowledge of ATC Procedures & Services
• Knowledge of NextGen, SESAR, OneSky
• Operators
• RPA End Users: Pilot & Payload
• Small & Large
• CPA Pilots
• NewTechnologies: Airware, LATAS, UTM
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Skills to Deal with Scope of Work
If we bypass what the US/Europeans are doing,
• was the decision underpinned by knowledge and expertise or ignorance,
business agendas or simply plucked?
• What are the safety implications?
• Are there disengaged people in the room that know better?
• Are there engaged people who don’t?
Safety
New
Tech &
Security
DAA
& CNPC
Current
ATM
Procs
Risk
to
People
Separation
Standards
Different
Flight
Profiles
Safety
DAA & CNPC
Current
ATM
Procs
Separation
Standards
Key Questions
• Can we improve pace of change?
• Yes.
• If we convince industry to re-engage
• Seek the Goldilocks Effect
Required Expertise: DAA
• Sensors (Cooperative & Non-Cooperative)
• Sensor Integration, Blending, target tracking
• System Architectures
• Separation & Avoidance Logic,ACAS Logic
• Operations
• Information Processing
• Aircraft Performance & Manoevreability
• ATC
Required Expertise: CNPC
• DigitalComms
• Terrain, Urban, Obstacle Database Mgt
• Comms, Nav, Surveillance (CNS)
• EM Spectrum Environment & Measurement
• Spectrum Management
• SATCOM Infrastructure
• Small UAVs
• RCP, QoS, Safety & Security
• GNSS
• Modelling & Simulation
• Advanced Control
Required Expertise: ATM & Operations
• ATC & ATM Specialists
• Flight Planning
• Knowledge of ATM SurveillanceAssets
• Knowledge of ATC Procedures & Services
• Knowledge of NextGen, SESAR, OneSky
• Operators
• RPA End Users: Pilot & Payload
• Small & Large
• CPA Pilots
• NewTechnologies: Airware, LATAS, UTM
Manpower & Skill
CASA & Industry
Sense&Avoid
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
RTCA White Papers & MOPS
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
RTCA White Papers & MOPS
Focused on UA which require approval to fly in airspace
normally frequented by commercial transport aircraft
Facilitates transition to/from Class A or special use airspace,
traversing Class D, E, & G airspace
Not applicable to sUAS:
• Must be > 55lb
• Capable of DAA forCooperative & Uncooperative. radar,
ADSB,TCAS…
Phase 1 MOPS
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
RTCA White Papers & MOPS
Focused on UA which require approval to fly in airspace
normally frequented by commercial transport aircraft
Facilitates transition to/from Class A or special use airspace,
traversing Class D, E, & G airspace
Not applicable to sUAS:
• Must be > 55lb
• Capable of DAA forCooperative & Uncooperative. radar,
ADSB,TCAS…
Phase 1 MOPS
0
500
1000
2011 2012 2013 2014
DJI
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
RTCA White Papers & MOPS
Focused on UA which require approval to fly in airspace
normally frequented by commercial transport aircraft
Facilitates transition to/from Class A or special use airspace,
traversing Class D, E, & G airspace
Not applicable to sUAS:
• Must be > 55lb
• Capable of DAA forCooperative & Uncooperative. radar,
ADSB,TCAS…
Phase 1 MOPS
0
500
1000
2011 2012 2013 2014
DJI
Still Prudent to pay attention to Contents,
• Unknown Unknowns are not good when approving BVLOS or
• Accepting lower quality equipment
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Encounter Set: Understanding the Risk
DetectEncounters
Own-ship
Data
Tracker
Alerting
Guidance
Display Pilot
Aircraft
Model
DAATimelineAllocation Summary
DAA MOPS Appendix J,Table J-2
Step Time (sec)
Detect (Sensor) 5
Track (Sensor) 5
Evaluate (DAAP) 1
TransmitTracks (CNPC) 2
Display 1
Declare (DGP) 1
Determine (Pilot) 10 ( NASA HITL)
Pilot-ATC Interaction 10 ( NASA HITL)
Pilot Input (Pilot) 5 (NASA HITL)
RLP B (CNPC) 2 )
Maneuver (UA) 30 (Depends on speed)
Well Clear Boundary 35
Total 107
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
SC-228 MOPS Development
Radar Declaration Range
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
SC-228 MOPS Development
Alert
Pilot
Detect
Intruder
Determine
Resolution
15 s
Radar Declaration Range
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
SC-228 MOPS Development
Alert
Pilot
Detect
Intruder
Determine
Resolution
15 s
Negotiate
ATC
Clearance
10 s
Radar Declaration Range
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
SC-228 MOPS Development
Alert
Pilot
Detect
Intruder
Determine
Resolution
15 s
Negotiate
ATC
Clearance
10 s 30.0 s
maneuver
to
remain
well clear
(Aircraft Performance
Radar Declaration Range
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
SC-228 MOPS Development
Alert
Pilot
Detect
Intruder
Determine
Resolution
15 s
Negotiate
ATC
Clearance
10 s 30.0 s
maneuver
to
remain
well clear
(Aircraft Performance
35.0 s
DAAWell Clear
Radar Declaration Range
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
SC-228 MOPS Development
Alert
Pilot
Detect
Intruder
Determine
Resolution
15 s
Negotiate
ATC
Clearance
10 s 30.0 s
maneuver
to
remain
well clear
(Aircraft Performance
35.0 s
DAAWell Clear
Radar Declaration Range
110 seconds
RDR
Can vary up to 110 seconds as function of intruder
speed, ownship speed and intruder bearing angle
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
DAA Performance Assessment
Key ASTM F2411 SAA Requirement for Class 3
220 Degrees
30 Degrees
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
DAA Performance Assessment
Key ASTM F2411 SAA Requirement for Class 3
220 Degrees
30 Degrees
Day, Night, Bright Light, & any
weather
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Angular Resolution & Stabilisation
Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Angular Resolution & Stabilisation
Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Angular Resolution & Stabilisation
Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Angular Resolution & Stabilisation
Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Angular Resolution & Stabilisation
Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Angular Resolution & Stabilisation
Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Angular Resolution & Stabilisation
Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Angular Resolution & Stabilisation
Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Angular Resolution & Stabilisation
Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Angular Resolution & Stabilisation
Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Angular Resolution & Stabilisation
Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
Detection Range
Populated
Area
A300 Passenger
Aircraft
Surveillance
RPA: Luna
Time Taken Less than 1 second
Luna Imagery Before Crash
Landing near Kabul
NMAC
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Practicalities of DAA
Minimum Maneuvering Time Example
60 kts
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Practicalities of DAA
Minimum Maneuvering Time Example
60 kts
A380
240 kts
24 m
12 m
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Practicalities of DAA
Minimum Maneuvering Time Example
60 kts
300 kts closing speed
A380
240 kts
24 m
12 m
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Practicalities of DAA
Minimum Maneuvering Time Example
DJI Phantom 3
Max Descent: 590.551 feet per minute
Max Speed 16 m/s (no wind) = 31 kts
60 kts
Scan Eagle:
• Max ROC: 150m/min (491 feet per minute)
• Lets assume can descend at same rate ( not a given)
• Cruise Speed
300 kts closing speed
A380
240 kts
24 m
12 m
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Practicalities of DAA
Minimum Maneuvering Time Example
DJI Phantom 3
Max Descent: 590.551 feet per minute
Max Speed 16 m/s (no wind) = 31 kts
60 kts
Scan Eagle:
• Max ROC: 150m/min (491 feet per minute)
• Lets assume can descend at same rate ( not a given)
• Cruise Speed
300 kts closing speed
A380
240 kts
24 m
12 m
• Time to climb/descend 12 m is 4.8 seconds (
12
150
) mins
• 300 kts closing speed = 5 nm per minute
• Decision to MOVE must be made at (
4.8
60
) x 5kts : 740 m range
• Assumes an instantaneous reaction..
A380 79.8 m
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0200040006000800010000
NoofPixelsRepresentingAircraft
Range between A380 and State Aircraft
25 m
For 300 kt Closing Speed
5mm focal length
3.75 um pixel width
HFOV =44 degrees
A380 79.8 m
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0200040006000800010000
NoofPixelsRepresentingAircraft
Range between A380 and State Aircraft
At 3000 m :
• 20 seconds to Collision,
• Intruder is 11 pixels
• Approx 1% of HFOV (1024 pixels)
At 2000 m:
• 13 seconds to Collision,
• Intruder is 16 Pixels
• Approx 1.5% of HFOV
25 m
For 300 kt Closing Speed
5mm focal length
3.75 um pixel width
HFOV =44 degrees
A380 79.8 m
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0200040006000800010000
NoofPixelsRepresentingAircraft
Range between A380 and State Aircraft
At 3000 m :
• 20 seconds to Collision,
• Intruder is 11 pixels
• Approx 1% of HFOV (1024 pixels)
At 2000 m:
• 13 seconds to Collision,
• Intruder is 16 Pixels
• Approx 1.5% of HFOV
25 m
At 1000 m
• 6.5 seconds to Collision,
• Intruder is 33 Pixels
• 3 % of HFOV (44 degrees)
For 300 kt Closing Speed
5mm focal length
3.75 um pixel width
HFOV =44 degrees
At 1000 m
• 6.5 seconds to Collision,
• Intruder is 33 Pixels
• 3 % of HFOV
At 3000 m
• 20 seconds to Collision,
• Intruder is 11 pixels
• 1% of HFOV
For 300 kt Closing Speed
5mm focal length
3.75 um pixel width
220 Degrees
220 Degrees
At 1000 m
• 6.5 seconds to Collision,
• Intruder is 33 Pixels
• 3 % of 44degree HFOV
44 Degrees HFOV
220 Degrees
At 1000 m
• 6.5 seconds to Collision,
• Intruder is 33 Pixels
• 3 % of 44degree HFOV
44 Degrees HFOV
Actually 0.6% of 220 degrees
FoR required by specification
220 Degrees
At 1000 m
• 6.5 seconds to Collision,
• Intruder is 33 Pixels
• 3 % of 44degree HFOV
44 Degrees HFOV
Actually 0.6% of 220 degrees
FoR required by specification
Thankfully,A380’s don’t operate at
low level without ATC separation…..
but willATC know about the UAV?
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
ATM Operations
Aircraft Performance: Different climb & descent rates, turn radius, cruise speed
Issues for DAA & ATM
Missions: RPAS loitering & Surveillance: CPA Point A to B
100 kts
300 ft/min
Radius ~ 1 NM
450 kts
1500 ft/min
Radius ~ 8 NM
Loiter Pattern
Point to Point
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Encounters
80 Baseline Stressing Cases @ 6,000’ or 18,000’ Alt
24-Head-On
• 250kt or 500kt
• 0, 1500, 3000 fpm
• 0, 2500’, 12000’ HMD
• 0, 500’, 1000’ VMD
12-Overtake
• 150kt vs. 100 or 140kt
• 0, -1500 fpm
• 0, 250’ HMD
• 0, 500’ VMD
32-Converging
• 250kt or 500kt
• 0 or -3000 fpm
• 0, 2500’, 12000’ HMD
• 0, 500’, 1000’ VMD
• 60 , 90 , 120 IA
12-Maneuvering Intr
• 250kt or 500kt
• 0 or +1500 fpm
• 0, 2500’, 12000’ HMD
• 0, 500’ VMD
15 Additional Cases
5-USAF
• Crossing Geometry
• Alt-Crossing Before
CPA
5-MIT/LL
• Mixed Geometry
5-NASA
• Parallel Course
• Vertically
Converging
+
1. Lincoln Labs Data
• Correlated
• Uncorrelated
2. Scripted Stress Cases
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Encounters: Head On Encounters
24 Head On
• 250kt or 500kt
• 0, 1500, 3000 fpm
• 0, 2500’, 12000’ HMD
• 0, 500’, 1000’VMD
1. Lincoln Labs Data
• Correlated
• Uncorrelated
2. Scripted Stress Cases
*.KMZ Images generated using Code from Institute for Aerospace Research,
National Research Centre, Canadian with support from Kris Ellis
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Converging Encounters
32 Converging Encounters
• 250kt or 500kt
• 0 or -3000 fpm
• 0, 2500’, 12000’ HMD
• 0, 500’, 1000’VMD
• 60 , 90 , 120 IA
1. Lincoln Labs Data
• Correlated
• Uncorrelated
2. Scripted Stress Cases
*.KMZ Images generated using Code from Institute for Aerospace Research,
National Research Centre, Canadian with support from Kris Ellis
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Manoevering Encounters
12 Maneuvering Stress Cases
• 250kt or 500kt
• 0 or +1500 fpm
• 0, 2500’, 12000’ HMD
• 0, 500’VMD
1. Lincoln Labs Data
• Correlated
• Uncorrelated
2. Scripted Stress Cases
*.KMZ Images generated using Code from Institute for Aerospace Research,
National Research Centre, Canadian with support from Kris Ellis
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Overtaking Encounters
12 Overtaking Encounters
1. Lincoln Labs Data
• Correlated
• Uncorrelated
2. Scripted Stress Cases
• 150kt vs. 100 or 140kt
• 0, -1500 fpm
• 0, 250’ HMD
• 0, 500’VMD
*.KMZ Images generated using Code from Institute for Aerospace Research,
National Research Centre, Canadian with support from Kris Ellis
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Overtaking Encounters
12 Overtaking Encounters1. Lincoln Labs Data
• Correlated
• Uncorrelated
2. Scripted Stress Cases
• 150kt vs. 100 or 140kt
• 0, -1500 fpm
• 0, 250’ HMD
• 0, 500’VMD
*.KMZ Images generated using Code from Institute for Aerospace Research,
National Research Centre, Canadian with support from Kris Ellis
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Detect & Avoid
Overtaking Encounters
12 Overtaking Encounters1. Lincoln Labs Data
• Correlated
• Uncorrelated
2. Scripted Stress Cases
• 150kt vs. 100 or 140kt
• 0, -1500 fpm
• 0, 250’ HMD
• 0, 500’VMD
This is for Large UAVs conducting BVLOS
Which parts are not relevant for sUAS!
How will these decision be made?
And what about C2 LinkVulnerabilities!
*.KMZ Images generated using Code from Institute for Aerospace Research,
National Research Centre, Canadian with support from Kris Ellis
Command
&
Non-PayloadCommunications
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Command Non Payload Control
RTCA SC-228 White Paper C2 Data Link
Source: RTCAWP-2: Command & Control Data Link ( 18 Mar 2014)
UAS Data Link
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Command Non Payload Control
RTCA SC-228 White Paper C2 Data Link
Source: RTCAWP-2: Command & Control Data Link ( 18 Mar 2014)
UAS Data Link
UAS Payload Link
Out of Scope
Payload Link: carries all logical flows associated with mission
payload package.
No Safety of flight information, so not required to be in
aviation safety protected spectrum.
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Command Non Payload Control
RTCA SC-228 White Paper C2 Data Link
Source: RTCAWP-2: Command & Control Data Link ( 18 Mar 2014)
UAS Data Link
UAS Control & NON
Payload Comms (CNPC)
Link
UAS Payload Link
Command & Non-Payload Comms; Carries all logical flows
associated with controlling the flight of the aircraft as well as
aircraft system status monitoing and link mgt. Expected to be
relatively low bandwidth
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Command Non Payload Control
RTCA SC-228 White Paper C2 Data Link
Source: RTCAWP-2: Command & Control Data Link ( 18 Mar 2014)
UAS Data Link
UAS Control & NON
Payload Comms (CNPC)
Link
PilotATC Link
UAS Payload Link
Voice
Data eg CPDLC
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Command Non Payload Control
RTCA SC-228 White Paper C2 Data Link
Source: RTCAWP-2: Command & Control Data Link ( 18 Mar 2014)
UAS Data Link
UAS Control & NON
Payload Comms (CNPC)
Link
UAS Control LinkPilotATC Link
Telecommand Link
UAS Payload Link
UPLINK from pilot to AC to Aircraft
• Information needed to control flight trajectory
• Information needed to control all aircraft systems required
for safe flight
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Command Non Payload Control
RTCA SC-228 White Paper C2 Data Link
Source: RTCAWP-2: Command & Control Data Link ( 18 Mar 2014)
UAS Data Link
UAS Control & NON
Payload Comms (CNPC)
Link
UAS Control LinkPilotATC Link
Telemetry Link
UAS Payload Link
Telemetry link DOWNLINK from AC to Pilot
Aircraft location, attitude & speed
System status
Onboard NAVAID data
Track data
FPV is on board
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Command Non Payload Control
• C2 Link provides reliable communication between PIC and RPA and ATC
• May or may not occur via RPA
Expectations
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Command Non Payload Control
• C2 Link provides reliable communication between PIC and RPA and ATC
• May or may not occur via RPA
• Reliability of link must be appropriate for the environment
• Airports and DenseTraffic
• Departure & Arrival
• Enroute:
• Class A airspace Oceanic
• What is the Quality of Service of the link
• RF propagation, Signal Fading,Antenna Placement, frequency diversity
• Protection from interference:Which Spectrum,CAPACITY expectations, Security
Expectations
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Command Non Payload Control
• C2 Link provides reliable communication between PIC and RPA and ATC
• May or may not occur via RPA
• Reliability of link must be appropriate for the environment
• Airports and DenseTraffic
• Departure & Arrival
• Enroute:
• Class A airspace Oceanic
• What is the Quality of Service of the link
• RF propagation, Signal Fading, Antenna Placement, frequency diversity
• Protection from interference: Which Spectrum, CAPACITY expectations, Security
• BVLOS vehicles must have an ability to maintain predictable flight on a planned heading & altitude
if they lose CNPC.
• What airspace could they enter if they lose link
• Contingency Management: Software Assurance
Expectations
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Availability and Continuity
Indigenous Capacity: Knowing your limitations
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CNPC
Critical Failure Modes
Overall
Availability & Continuity
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CNPC
Critical Failure Modes
Overall
Availability & Continuity
OR
C2 Link Interruption-No
Component Fail
RPAS C2 Link
Component Fail
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CNPC
Critical Failure Modes
Overall
Availability & Continuity
OR
C2 Link Interruption-No
Component Fail
RPAS C2 Link
Component Fail
Propagation
Event
Interference
Event
Airframe
Obstruction
Capacity
OR
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CNPC
Critical Failure Modes
Overall
Availability & Continuity
OR
C2 Link Interruption-No
Component Fail
Propagation
Event
Interference
Event
Airframe
Obstruction
Capacity
OR
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CNPC
Critical Failure Modes
Overall
Availability & Continuity
OR
C2 Link Interruption-No
Component Fail
Propagation
Event
Interference
Event
Airframe
Obstruction
Capacity
OR
David W. Matolak , Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Air-Ground Channel
Characterization Results , University of South Carolina
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
CNPC
Critical Failure Modes
Overall
Availability & Continuity
OR
C2 Link Interruption-No
Component Fail
Propagation
Event
Interference
Event
Airframe
Obstruction
Capacity
OR
How long is
Acceptable to lose
link?
David W. Matolak , Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Air-Ground Channel
Characterization Results , University of South Carolina
Prepared by :Terrence Martin Source Page 4-4 ICAO 9869
Dealing with Uncertainty
Separation: RCP Transaction times
Aircraft Separation is a function of many things, including
timeframe required for ATC to communicate with Aircraft
to effect a manouevers
RPAs can have different comms pathways, thus longer
comms timeframes eg satellite, HF etc
How much separation is required for these instances??
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Source:Page 4-4 ICAO 9869
Dealing with Uncertainty
C2 Link Required Communication Performance
RP Send
Message
ATC
receives
Indication
of
Message
Imbound
ATC
Understand
Message
ATC
Compose
Feedback
ATC
Sends
Message
RP Gets
Indication
of
Imbound
Message
RP
Compose
Message
RP
Completes
Action
RP
Transmits
Completion
Typical RPAS C2TransactionTime
TotalTime is combination of:
• Human to Machine & Machine Machine Interface
• Human ReactionTimes
• Tech Communication Media: Satellite, Microwave,….relayed or LOS
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Source:Page 4-4 ICAO 9869
Dealing with Uncertainty
C2 Link Required Communication Performance
RP Send
Message
ATC
receives
Indication
of
Message
Imbound
ATC
Understand
Message
ATC
Compose
Feedback
ATC
Sends
Message
RP Gets
Indication
of
Imbound
Message
RP
Compose
Message
RP
Completes
Action
RP
Transmits
Completion
Typical RPAS C2TransactionTime
TotalTime is combination of:
• Human to Machine & Machine Machine Interface
• Human ReactionTimes
• Tech Communication Media: Satellite, Microwave,….relayed or LOS
LongerTime: Greater Separation
• Eg CPDLC whilst travelling internationally means much greater separation
distances in Oceanic
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Dealing with Uncertainty
CASA AC 101-1 Sect 5.10.3 states:
The parameters, which determine acceptable intermittent loss of signal and total loss, will be
set by the manufacturer..
Should the determination of an acceptable duration for Lost Link
beforeATC is advised, at least involve the REGULATOR & ANSP
Indigenous Capacity : CNPC & RCP in Oz
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Dealing with Uncertainty
Indigenous Capacity: Lost Link Decision Times
Taxi, Takeoff and Landing. Within 5nm of runway and below 10kft.
• Lost C2 Link Decision time = 2 seconds.
• Short time required because risk may increase rapidly and the pilot may
not have time to intervene for a RPA with a low automation level.
• A Lost C2 Link must be declared quickly;
More automatic operation required by RPA if these times cant be achieved
2 NM 3 NM
400ft AGL
100ft AGL
0 NM
500ft
600ft AGL RPAS
How Long would it take for RPAS to Communicate Lost Link to ATC???
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Dealing with Uncertainty
Indigenous Capacity: Lost Link Decision Times
Departure and Arrival. RPA within 30nm of runway and below 18kft.
• RLOS at this longer range
• Lost C2 Link Decision time = 10seconds.
• Equivalent to the ATC RCP for terminal areas.
Enroute. RPA greater than 30nm from runway and below 60kft.
• Use BRLOS (terrestrial network)
• 10 seconds Lost C2 Link Decision time (non-satellite)
• 30 seconds when satellite C2 Link, e.g. when significantly further way
than 30nm.
FutureDirections
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Future Directions
1. Goals, Milestones, National Priorities and what is Achievable
• Capturing & Communicating gaps preventing achievement
• Reality: National Aspirations tempered by Indigenous Capacity & Money
• 80:20 Rule
• Transparency: fostering industry Buy-In for solutions
Creating, Communicating and Enacting a Feasible Roadmap
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Future Directions
1. Goals, Milestones, National Priorities and what is Achievable
• Capturing & Communicating gaps preventing achievement
• Reality: National Aspirations tempered by Indigenous Capacity & Money
• 80:20 Rule
• Transparency: fostering industry Buy-In for solutions
2. Workforce:
• What is available, what is required, and how can we improve it
• Fostering Industry Buy-In
• Working Group Restructure: Motivation, Skills
Creating, Communicating and Enacting a Feasible Roadmap
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Future Directions
1. Goals, Milestones, National Priorities and what is Achievable
• Capturing & Communicating gaps preventing achievement
• Reality: National Aspirations tempered by Indigenous Capacity & Money
• 80:20 Rule
• Transparency: fostering industry Buy-In for solutions
2. Workforce:
• What is available, what is required, and how can we improve it
• Fostering Industry Buy-In
• Working Group Restructure: Motivation, Skills
3. CoordinatedTrials
Creating, Communicating and Enacting a Feasible Roadmap
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Future Directions
Australian Goals & timeliness will be a
compromise:
• Our Economic Priorities
• Our Indigenous Capacity
• CASA & Industry
• Money
• R&D expertise
• There will be some reliance on
overseas regulatory development
CANWE FINESSE an
OPTIMAL BALANCE?
Goals, National Priorities & Achievability
14 Key R&D Activities:
• EVLOS/VLOS
• 1.RPAS activities awareness for security
• 2. Operations in Urban Areas
• 3. Human Factors
• IFR/VFR
• 4. Visual Detectability solutions
• 5. DAA
• 6. Comms C2 Datalink
• 7. Airspace & Airport Access
• 8 Contingency
• BVLOS
• 9. DAA
• 10. Comms C2 Datalink
• 11 Airspace & Airport Access
• 12. Security
• 13 Human Factors: BVLOS & IFR/VFR
• 14 Best Practice Demonstration
Goals
Milestones
Gaps & Barriers
Action Items
Priorities &Timelines
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Future Directions
Goals, National Priorities & Achievability
14 Key R&D Activities:
• EVLOS/VLOS
• 1.RPAS activities awareness for security
• 2. Operations in Urban Areas
• 3. Human Factors
• IFR/VFR
• 4. Visual Detectability solutions
• 5. DAA
• 6. Comms C2 Datalink
• 7. Airspace & Airport Access
• 8 Contingency
• BVLOS
• 9. DAA
• 10. Comms C2 Datalink
• 11 Airspace & Airport Access
• 12. Security
• 13 Human Factors: BVLOS & IFR/VFR
• 14 Best Practice Demonstration
Goals
Milestones
Gaps & Barriers
Action Items
Priorities &Timelines
Still important that we:
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Future Directions
Goals, National Priorities & Achievability
14 Key R&D Activities:
• EVLOS/VLOS
• 1.RPAS activities awareness for security
• 2. Operations in Urban Areas
• 3. Human Factors
• IFR/VFR
• 4. Visual Detectability solutions
• 5. DAA
• 6. Comms C2 Datalink
• 7. Airspace & Airport Access
• 8 Contingency
• BVLOS
• 9. DAA
• 10. Comms C2 Datalink
• 11 Airspace & Airport Access
• 12. Security
• 13 Human Factors: BVLOS & IFR/VFR
• 14 Best Practice Demonstration
Goals
Milestones
Gaps & Barriers
Action Items
Priorities &Timelines
Still important that we:
•Identify gaps &/or available
mitigations and prioritise their
treatment
• Relevant to Australian Priorities
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Future Directions
Goals, National Priorities & Achievability
14 Key R&D Activities:
• EVLOS/VLOS
• 1.RPAS activities awareness for security
• 2. Operations in Urban Areas
• 3. Human Factors
• IFR/VFR
• 4. Visual Detectability solutions
• 5. DAA
• 6. Comms C2 Datalink
• 7. Airspace & Airport Access
• 8 Contingency
• BVLOS
• 9. DAA
• 10. Comms C2 Datalink
• 11 Airspace & Airport Access
• 12. Security
• 13 Human Factors: BVLOS & IFR/VFR
• 14 Best Practice Demonstration
Goals
Milestones
Gaps & Barriers
Action Items
Priorities &Timelines
Still important that we:
•Identify gaps &/or available
mitigations and prioritise their
treatment
• Relevant to Australian Priorities
•Do it quickly, without
compromising safety
• Take what is useful: dispense with
what is not
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Future Directions
Goals, National Priorities & Achievability
14 Key R&D Activities:
• EVLOS/VLOS
• 1.RPAS activities awareness for security
• 2. Operations in Urban Areas
• 3. Human Factors
• IFR/VFR
• 4. Visual Detectability solutions
• 5. DAA
• 6. Comms C2 Datalink
• 7. Airspace & Airport Access
• 8 Contingency
• BVLOS
• 9. DAA
• 10. Comms C2 Datalink
• 11 Airspace & Airport Access
• 12. Security
• 13 Human Factors: BVLOS & IFR/VFR
• 14 Best Practice Demonstration
Goals
Milestones
Gaps & Barriers
Action Items
Priorities &Timelines
Still important that we:
•Identify gaps &/or available
mitigations and prioritise their
treatment
• Relevant to Australian Priorities
•Do it quickly, without
compromising safety
• Take what is useful: dispense with
what is not
•Communicate to Industry what is
needed
• Allow them to help
Priorities & Demographics
Airspace Size
/Weight
Population
G Small
Barren,
Rural,
Urban,
City??
Med
Large
E Small
Med
Large
D Small
Med
Large
Priorities & Demographics EVLOS BVLOS BRLOS IMC
Airspace Size
/Weight
Population
G Small
Barren,
Rural,
Urban,
City??
Med
Large
E Small
Med
Large
D Small
Med
Large
Priorities & Demographics BVLOS BRLOS IMC
Airspace Size
/Weight
Population
TechSpec
Gaps
Procedural
Gaps
Tech
Solutions
Operational
Mitigations
TechSpec
Gaps
Procedural
Gaps
Tech
Solutions
Operational
Mitigations
TechSpec
Gaps
Procedural
Gaps
Tech
Solutions
Operational
Mitigations
G Small
Barren,
Rural,
Urban,
City??
Med
Large
E Small
Med
Large
D Small
Med
Large
Priorities & Demographics BVLOS
Airspace Size /Weight Population
TechSpec
Gaps
Procedural
Gaps
Tech
Solutions
Operational
Mitigations
D
Small
Barren, Rural,
Urban, City??
N N Y Y
Med Y Y N Y
Large Y Y N Not yet
Understood
Priorities & Demographics BVLOS
Airspace Size /Weight Population
TechSpec
Gaps
Procedural
Gaps
Tech
Solutions
Operational
Mitigations
D
Small
Barren, Rural,
Urban, City??
N N Y Y
Med Y Y N Y
Large Y Y N Not yet
Understood
Identifies
• Easy Pickings
• Missing Enablers
• Accountable Organisation
• Uncertainties
Priorities & Demographics BVLOS
Airspace Size /Weight Population
TechSpec
Gaps
Procedural
Gaps
Tech
Solutions
Operational
Mitigations
D
Small
Barren, Rural,
Urban, City??
N N Y Y
Med Y Y N Y
Large Y Y N Not yet
Understood
Uncertainty
• What Equipment
• What Restrictions
• What Procedures
• WhatTraining.
Identifies
• Easy Pickings
• Missing Enablers
• Accountable Organisation
• Uncertainties
Priorities & Demographics BVLOS
Airspace Size /Weight Population
TechSpec
Gaps
Procedural
Gaps
Tech
Solutions
Operational
Mitigations
D
Small
Barren, Rural,
Urban, City??
N N Y Y
Med Y Y N Y
Large Y Y N Not yet
Understood
Uncertainty
• What Equipment
• What Restrictions
• What Procedures
• WhatTraining.
Identifies
• Easy Pickings
• Missing Enablers
• Accountable Organisation
• Uncertainties
• Trials
• Close Following
Priorities & Demographics BVLOS
Airspace Size /Weight Population
TechSpec
Gaps
Procedural
Gaps
Tech
Solutions
Operational
Mitigations
D
Small
Barren, Rural,
Urban, City??
N N Y Y
Med Y Y N Y
Large Y Y N Not yet
Understood
Uncertainty
• What Equipment
• What Restrictions
• What Procedures
• WhatTraining.
Identifies
• Easy Pickings
• Missing Enablers
• Accountable Organisation
• Uncertainties
• Trials
• Close Following
Highlights
• Capacity Shortfalls
• Internal to CASA/ASA
• Indigenous
Priorities & Demographics BVLOS
Airspace Size /Weight Population
TechSpec
Gaps
Procedural
Gaps
Tech
Solutions
Operational
Mitigations
D
Small
Barren, Rural,
Urban, City??
N N Y Y
Med Y Y N Y
Large Y Y N Not yet
Understood
Uncertainty
• What Equipment
• What Restrictions
• What Procedures
• WhatTraining.
Identifies
• Easy Pickings
• Missing Enablers
• Accountable Organisation
• Uncertainties
• Trials
• Close Following
Highlights
• Capacity Shortfalls
• Internal to CASA/ASA
• Indigenous
• Could GetVery Busy……
• Could we reduce/bypass lower priority work
Priorities & Demographics BVLOS
Airspace Size /Weight Population
TechSpec
Gaps
Procedural
Gaps
Tech
Solutions
Operational
Mitigations
Priorities & Demographics BVLOS
Airspace Size /Weight Population
TechSpec
Gaps
Procedural
Gaps
Tech
Solutions
Operational
Mitigations
OPERATION IDENTIFIED AS HIGH NATIONAL
IMPORTANCE
Y Y N ?????
Priorities & Demographics BVLOS
Airspace Size /Weight Population
TechSpec
Gaps
Procedural
Gaps
Tech
Solutions
Operational
Mitigations
OPERATION IDENTIFIED AS HIGH NATIONAL
IMPORTANCE
Y Y N ?????
OPERATION WITH HIGH COMMUNITY DEMAND N Y Y ?????
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Future Direction
80:20 Rule
• Training
• Operations
• InitialAirworthiness
• Continuing Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
MOPS Expectations
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Future Direction
80:20 Rule
Treating All CONOPS Equally
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Future Direction
80:20 Rule
Treating All CONOPS Equally
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Future Direction
80:20 Rule
Treating All CONOPS Equally
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Future Direction
80:20 Rule
Treating All CONOPS Equally
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Future Direction
80:20 Rule
Treating All CONOPS Equally
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
Prepared by :Terrence Martin
Future Direction
80:20 Rule
Treating All CONOPS Equally
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
• Training
• Ops
• Initial Airworthiness
• Continuing
Airworthiness
• ATM Interoperability
Clearly insufficient workforce to enact for each CONOPS,
BUT….
CASA UASSC Meeting May 2016- Presentation by Industry Chair, Terry Martin
CASA UASSC Meeting May 2016- Presentation by Industry Chair, Terry Martin
CASA UASSC Meeting May 2016- Presentation by Industry Chair, Terry Martin
CASA UASSC Meeting May 2016- Presentation by Industry Chair, Terry Martin
CASA UASSC Meeting May 2016- Presentation by Industry Chair, Terry Martin
CASA UASSC Meeting May 2016- Presentation by Industry Chair, Terry Martin
CASA UASSC Meeting May 2016- Presentation by Industry Chair, Terry Martin
CASA UASSC Meeting May 2016- Presentation by Industry Chair, Terry Martin
CASA UASSC Meeting May 2016- Presentation by Industry Chair, Terry Martin
CASA UASSC Meeting May 2016- Presentation by Industry Chair, Terry Martin
CASA UASSC Meeting May 2016- Presentation by Industry Chair, Terry Martin
CASA UASSC Meeting May 2016- Presentation by Industry Chair, Terry Martin
CASA UASSC Meeting May 2016- Presentation by Industry Chair, Terry Martin

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a CASA UASSC Meeting May 2016- Presentation by Industry Chair, Terry Martin

Connecting Above the Cloud
Connecting Above the CloudConnecting Above the Cloud
Connecting Above the CloudPeter Coffee
 
Nova MASS brief to Industry- UTM Trials May 2017
Nova MASS brief to Industry- UTM Trials May 2017Nova MASS brief to Industry- UTM Trials May 2017
Nova MASS brief to Industry- UTM Trials May 2017Terrence Martin (PhD)
 
Growing Information Intensity of Energy 2014
Growing Information Intensity of Energy 2014Growing Information Intensity of Energy 2014
Growing Information Intensity of Energy 2014Peter C. Evans, PhD
 
A New Generation of Practical Web-based Tools for Sustainability Professionals
A New Generation of Practical Web-based Tools for Sustainability ProfessionalsA New Generation of Practical Web-based Tools for Sustainability Professionals
A New Generation of Practical Web-based Tools for Sustainability ProfessionalsSustainable Brands
 
The Internet of Things: An Overview (IoT) ISOC SFO Chapter INET
The Internet of Things: An Overview (IoT) ISOC SFO Chapter INETThe Internet of Things: An Overview (IoT) ISOC SFO Chapter INET
The Internet of Things: An Overview (IoT) ISOC SFO Chapter INETKaren Rose
 
Harness the Power of Big Data with Oracle
Harness the Power of Big Data with OracleHarness the Power of Big Data with Oracle
Harness the Power of Big Data with OracleSai Janakiram Penumuru
 
Democratization - New Wave of Data Science (홍운표 상무, DataRobot) :: AWS Techfor...
Democratization - New Wave of Data Science (홍운표 상무, DataRobot) :: AWS Techfor...Democratization - New Wave of Data Science (홍운표 상무, DataRobot) :: AWS Techfor...
Democratization - New Wave of Data Science (홍운표 상무, DataRobot) :: AWS Techfor...Amazon Web Services Korea
 
Disruptive Technologies: Impact on Strategic Alliances, Partnerships & Channels
Disruptive Technologies: Impact on Strategic Alliances, Partnerships & ChannelsDisruptive Technologies: Impact on Strategic Alliances, Partnerships & Channels
Disruptive Technologies: Impact on Strategic Alliances, Partnerships & ChannelsPhil Hogg
 
Leveraging Your Security System to Impact Your Bottom line
Leveraging Your Security System to Impact Your Bottom lineLeveraging Your Security System to Impact Your Bottom line
Leveraging Your Security System to Impact Your Bottom lineguidepostsolutions
 
How to get a HR system in place fast.
How to get a HR system in place fast.How to get a HR system in place fast.
How to get a HR system in place fast.CoreHR
 
The Cloud and the Car
The Cloud and the CarThe Cloud and the Car
The Cloud and the CarBarry Gander
 
Exploring the Digital Oilfield 2016
Exploring the Digital Oilfield 2016Exploring the Digital Oilfield 2016
Exploring the Digital Oilfield 2016Inductive Automation
 
Testing Is How You Avoid Looking Stupid
Testing Is How You Avoid Looking StupidTesting Is How You Avoid Looking Stupid
Testing Is How You Avoid Looking StupidSteve Branam
 
Cata i canada the cloud and the car diva presentation aug 31 12
Cata i canada the cloud and the car diva presentation aug 31 12Cata i canada the cloud and the car diva presentation aug 31 12
Cata i canada the cloud and the car diva presentation aug 31 12Barry Gander
 
5th World and Texas Clusters Michael Bettersworth & Jim Brazell
5th World and Texas Clusters Michael Bettersworth & Jim Brazell5th World and Texas Clusters Michael Bettersworth & Jim Brazell
5th World and Texas Clusters Michael Bettersworth & Jim BrazellJim "Brodie" Brazell
 
Sure you’re growing, but are you scaling?
Sure you’re growing, but are you scaling?Sure you’re growing, but are you scaling?
Sure you’re growing, but are you scaling?Publicis Sapient
 
The Sky’s the Limit – The Rise of Machine Learnin
The Sky’s the Limit – The Rise of Machine LearninThe Sky’s the Limit – The Rise of Machine Learnin
The Sky’s the Limit – The Rise of Machine LearninInside Analysis
 

Similar a CASA UASSC Meeting May 2016- Presentation by Industry Chair, Terry Martin (20)

Connecting Above the Cloud
Connecting Above the CloudConnecting Above the Cloud
Connecting Above the Cloud
 
Asc overview 7 8-13
Asc overview 7 8-13Asc overview 7 8-13
Asc overview 7 8-13
 
Nova MASS brief to Industry- UTM Trials May 2017
Nova MASS brief to Industry- UTM Trials May 2017Nova MASS brief to Industry- UTM Trials May 2017
Nova MASS brief to Industry- UTM Trials May 2017
 
Disruptive technologies
Disruptive technologiesDisruptive technologies
Disruptive technologies
 
Growing Information Intensity of Energy 2014
Growing Information Intensity of Energy 2014Growing Information Intensity of Energy 2014
Growing Information Intensity of Energy 2014
 
A New Generation of Practical Web-based Tools for Sustainability Professionals
A New Generation of Practical Web-based Tools for Sustainability ProfessionalsA New Generation of Practical Web-based Tools for Sustainability Professionals
A New Generation of Practical Web-based Tools for Sustainability Professionals
 
The Internet of Things: An Overview (IoT) ISOC SFO Chapter INET
The Internet of Things: An Overview (IoT) ISOC SFO Chapter INETThe Internet of Things: An Overview (IoT) ISOC SFO Chapter INET
The Internet of Things: An Overview (IoT) ISOC SFO Chapter INET
 
Harness the Power of Big Data with Oracle
Harness the Power of Big Data with OracleHarness the Power of Big Data with Oracle
Harness the Power of Big Data with Oracle
 
Democratization - New Wave of Data Science (홍운표 상무, DataRobot) :: AWS Techfor...
Democratization - New Wave of Data Science (홍운표 상무, DataRobot) :: AWS Techfor...Democratization - New Wave of Data Science (홍운표 상무, DataRobot) :: AWS Techfor...
Democratization - New Wave of Data Science (홍운표 상무, DataRobot) :: AWS Techfor...
 
Disruptive Technologies: Impact on Strategic Alliances, Partnerships & Channels
Disruptive Technologies: Impact on Strategic Alliances, Partnerships & ChannelsDisruptive Technologies: Impact on Strategic Alliances, Partnerships & Channels
Disruptive Technologies: Impact on Strategic Alliances, Partnerships & Channels
 
Leveraging Your Security System to Impact Your Bottom line
Leveraging Your Security System to Impact Your Bottom lineLeveraging Your Security System to Impact Your Bottom line
Leveraging Your Security System to Impact Your Bottom line
 
How to get a HR system in place fast.
How to get a HR system in place fast.How to get a HR system in place fast.
How to get a HR system in place fast.
 
Exploring the Digital Oilfield
Exploring the Digital OilfieldExploring the Digital Oilfield
Exploring the Digital Oilfield
 
The Cloud and the Car
The Cloud and the CarThe Cloud and the Car
The Cloud and the Car
 
Exploring the Digital Oilfield 2016
Exploring the Digital Oilfield 2016Exploring the Digital Oilfield 2016
Exploring the Digital Oilfield 2016
 
Testing Is How You Avoid Looking Stupid
Testing Is How You Avoid Looking StupidTesting Is How You Avoid Looking Stupid
Testing Is How You Avoid Looking Stupid
 
Cata i canada the cloud and the car diva presentation aug 31 12
Cata i canada the cloud and the car diva presentation aug 31 12Cata i canada the cloud and the car diva presentation aug 31 12
Cata i canada the cloud and the car diva presentation aug 31 12
 
5th World and Texas Clusters Michael Bettersworth & Jim Brazell
5th World and Texas Clusters Michael Bettersworth & Jim Brazell5th World and Texas Clusters Michael Bettersworth & Jim Brazell
5th World and Texas Clusters Michael Bettersworth & Jim Brazell
 
Sure you’re growing, but are you scaling?
Sure you’re growing, but are you scaling?Sure you’re growing, but are you scaling?
Sure you’re growing, but are you scaling?
 
The Sky’s the Limit – The Rise of Machine Learnin
The Sky’s the Limit – The Rise of Machine LearninThe Sky’s the Limit – The Rise of Machine Learnin
The Sky’s the Limit – The Rise of Machine Learnin
 

Más de Terrence Martin (PhD)

JARUS WG 4/6 Meeting: T Martin, Z Huang, A McFadyen, “Airspace Risk Managemen...
JARUS WG 4/6 Meeting: T Martin, Z Huang, A McFadyen, “Airspace Risk Managemen...JARUS WG 4/6 Meeting: T Martin, Z Huang, A McFadyen, “Airspace Risk Managemen...
JARUS WG 4/6 Meeting: T Martin, Z Huang, A McFadyen, “Airspace Risk Managemen...Terrence Martin (PhD)
 
Lets Stop Faffing Around-Risk and UAV Integration
Lets Stop Faffing Around-Risk and UAV Integration Lets Stop Faffing Around-Risk and UAV Integration
Lets Stop Faffing Around-Risk and UAV Integration Terrence Martin (PhD)
 
Overview of the JARUS Specific Operations Risk Assessment Process
Overview of the JARUS Specific Operations Risk Assessment ProcessOverview of the JARUS Specific Operations Risk Assessment Process
Overview of the JARUS Specific Operations Risk Assessment ProcessTerrence Martin (PhD)
 
Terry Martin - CASA UAS Standards Committee Meeting Nov 2016
Terry Martin - CASA UAS Standards Committee Meeting Nov 2016Terry Martin - CASA UAS Standards Committee Meeting Nov 2016
Terry Martin - CASA UAS Standards Committee Meeting Nov 2016Terrence Martin (PhD)
 

Más de Terrence Martin (PhD) (6)

JARUS WG 4/6 Meeting: T Martin, Z Huang, A McFadyen, “Airspace Risk Managemen...
JARUS WG 4/6 Meeting: T Martin, Z Huang, A McFadyen, “Airspace Risk Managemen...JARUS WG 4/6 Meeting: T Martin, Z Huang, A McFadyen, “Airspace Risk Managemen...
JARUS WG 4/6 Meeting: T Martin, Z Huang, A McFadyen, “Airspace Risk Managemen...
 
UASSC Update by Industry Co-Chair
UASSC Update by Industry Co-ChairUASSC Update by Industry Co-Chair
UASSC Update by Industry Co-Chair
 
Lets Stop Faffing Around-Risk and UAV Integration
Lets Stop Faffing Around-Risk and UAV Integration Lets Stop Faffing Around-Risk and UAV Integration
Lets Stop Faffing Around-Risk and UAV Integration
 
Overview of the JARUS Specific Operations Risk Assessment Process
Overview of the JARUS Specific Operations Risk Assessment ProcessOverview of the JARUS Specific Operations Risk Assessment Process
Overview of the JARUS Specific Operations Risk Assessment Process
 
Terry Martin - CASA UAS Standards Committee Meeting Nov 2016
Terry Martin - CASA UAS Standards Committee Meeting Nov 2016Terry Martin - CASA UAS Standards Committee Meeting Nov 2016
Terry Martin - CASA UAS Standards Committee Meeting Nov 2016
 
Task force part 6 b_split
Task force  part 6 b_splitTask force  part 6 b_split
Task force part 6 b_split
 

Último

CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdfAsst.prof M.Gokilavani
 
Internet of things -Arshdeep Bahga .pptx
Internet of things -Arshdeep Bahga .pptxInternet of things -Arshdeep Bahga .pptx
Internet of things -Arshdeep Bahga .pptxVelmuruganTECE
 
Earthing details of Electrical Substation
Earthing details of Electrical SubstationEarthing details of Electrical Substation
Earthing details of Electrical Substationstephanwindworld
 
Past, Present and Future of Generative AI
Past, Present and Future of Generative AIPast, Present and Future of Generative AI
Past, Present and Future of Generative AIabhishek36461
 
System Simulation and Modelling with types and Event Scheduling
System Simulation and Modelling with types and Event SchedulingSystem Simulation and Modelling with types and Event Scheduling
System Simulation and Modelling with types and Event SchedulingBootNeck1
 
UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)
UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)
UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)Dr SOUNDIRARAJ N
 
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of ActionUS Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of ActionMebane Rash
 
complete construction, environmental and economics information of biomass com...
complete construction, environmental and economics information of biomass com...complete construction, environmental and economics information of biomass com...
complete construction, environmental and economics information of biomass com...asadnawaz62
 
Solving The Right Triangles PowerPoint 2.ppt
Solving The Right Triangles PowerPoint 2.pptSolving The Right Triangles PowerPoint 2.ppt
Solving The Right Triangles PowerPoint 2.pptJasonTagapanGulla
 
Input Output Management in Operating System
Input Output Management in Operating SystemInput Output Management in Operating System
Input Output Management in Operating SystemRashmi Bhat
 
Indian Dairy Industry Present Status and.ppt
Indian Dairy Industry Present Status and.pptIndian Dairy Industry Present Status and.ppt
Indian Dairy Industry Present Status and.pptMadan Karki
 
Main Memory Management in Operating System
Main Memory Management in Operating SystemMain Memory Management in Operating System
Main Memory Management in Operating SystemRashmi Bhat
 
Unit7-DC_Motors nkkjnsdkfnfcdfknfdgfggfg
Unit7-DC_Motors nkkjnsdkfnfcdfknfdgfggfgUnit7-DC_Motors nkkjnsdkfnfcdfknfdgfggfg
Unit7-DC_Motors nkkjnsdkfnfcdfknfdgfggfgsaravananr517913
 
Mine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptx
Mine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptxMine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptx
Mine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptxRomil Mishra
 
Introduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptx
Introduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptxIntroduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptx
Introduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptxk795866
 
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdfRisk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdfROCENODodongVILLACER
 
An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...
An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...
An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...Chandu841456
 
Transport layer issues and challenges - Guide
Transport layer issues and challenges - GuideTransport layer issues and challenges - Guide
Transport layer issues and challenges - GuideGOPINATHS437943
 

Último (20)

CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
 
POWER SYSTEMS-1 Complete notes examples
POWER SYSTEMS-1 Complete notes  examplesPOWER SYSTEMS-1 Complete notes  examples
POWER SYSTEMS-1 Complete notes examples
 
Internet of things -Arshdeep Bahga .pptx
Internet of things -Arshdeep Bahga .pptxInternet of things -Arshdeep Bahga .pptx
Internet of things -Arshdeep Bahga .pptx
 
young call girls in Green Park🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
young call girls in Green Park🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Serviceyoung call girls in Green Park🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
young call girls in Green Park🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
 
Earthing details of Electrical Substation
Earthing details of Electrical SubstationEarthing details of Electrical Substation
Earthing details of Electrical Substation
 
Past, Present and Future of Generative AI
Past, Present and Future of Generative AIPast, Present and Future of Generative AI
Past, Present and Future of Generative AI
 
System Simulation and Modelling with types and Event Scheduling
System Simulation and Modelling with types and Event SchedulingSystem Simulation and Modelling with types and Event Scheduling
System Simulation and Modelling with types and Event Scheduling
 
UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)
UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)
UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)
 
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of ActionUS Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
 
complete construction, environmental and economics information of biomass com...
complete construction, environmental and economics information of biomass com...complete construction, environmental and economics information of biomass com...
complete construction, environmental and economics information of biomass com...
 
Solving The Right Triangles PowerPoint 2.ppt
Solving The Right Triangles PowerPoint 2.pptSolving The Right Triangles PowerPoint 2.ppt
Solving The Right Triangles PowerPoint 2.ppt
 
Input Output Management in Operating System
Input Output Management in Operating SystemInput Output Management in Operating System
Input Output Management in Operating System
 
Indian Dairy Industry Present Status and.ppt
Indian Dairy Industry Present Status and.pptIndian Dairy Industry Present Status and.ppt
Indian Dairy Industry Present Status and.ppt
 
Main Memory Management in Operating System
Main Memory Management in Operating SystemMain Memory Management in Operating System
Main Memory Management in Operating System
 
Unit7-DC_Motors nkkjnsdkfnfcdfknfdgfggfg
Unit7-DC_Motors nkkjnsdkfnfcdfknfdgfggfgUnit7-DC_Motors nkkjnsdkfnfcdfknfdgfggfg
Unit7-DC_Motors nkkjnsdkfnfcdfknfdgfggfg
 
Mine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptx
Mine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptxMine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptx
Mine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptx
 
Introduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptx
Introduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptxIntroduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptx
Introduction-To-Agricultural-Surveillance-Rover.pptx
 
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdfRisk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
 
An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...
An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...
An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...
 
Transport layer issues and challenges - Guide
Transport layer issues and challenges - GuideTransport layer issues and challenges - Guide
Transport layer issues and challenges - Guide
 

CASA UASSC Meeting May 2016- Presentation by Industry Chair, Terry Martin

  • 1. ar caa UAV PROGRESS IN AUSTRALIA ITS TIME FOR CHANGE TERRY MARTIN
  • 2. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Presentation Overview 1. Background Background
  • 3. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Presentation Overview 1. Background • UAVs are goodness & some examples • Links to Innovation, Automation and Jobs market in Australia • Role of Regulation in a Healthy Innovation Ecosystem • Status Update on Regulatory Environment Background
  • 4. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Presentation Overview 1. Background 2. Key Problems • No Publically Available Plan • Available Workforce • Uncertain Scope ofWork • What needs to be done • National Priorities • Skill and Substantiation:Avoiding Schedule Slippage … Key Problems
  • 5. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Presentation Overview 1. Background 2. Key Problems 3. Future Directions Future Directions
  • 6. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Presentation Overview 1. Background 2. Key Problems 3. Future Directions • What’s Feasible with our workforce, • Motivating & recruiting Industry Help • Restructuring & Streamlining Working Groups • Targeting Effort • Identifying & Prioritising what’s necessary • 80:20 Rule: Freeing up CASA staff from tactical day to day.. • CoordinatedTrials that support CASA strategic intent Future Directions
  • 8. Prepared by :Terrence Martin NASA UAV Traffic Management (UTM) Overview
  • 9. Prepared by :Terrence Martin NASA UAV Traffic Management (UTM) Overview Principal Investigator: Parimal Kopardekar ”a cloud-based system that will help manage traffic at low altitudes and avoid collisions of UASs being operated beyond visual line of sight”
  • 10. Prepared by :Terrence Martin NASA UAV Traffic Management (UTM) Overview VIDEO Played LINK : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83Y14qglTCY
  • 11. Build 1: Completed • Establishment of Airspace Reservation • Focus on drone traffic management over unpopulated land/water • Minimal GA traffic, Aimed at agriculture, firefighting & infrastructure Build 2: Oct 2016 • Drones flying BLOS, • Drone tracking, low density ops • Sparsely populated areas
  • 12. Prepared by :Terrence Martin NASA UTM Traffic Management • NASA Strategy is Crawl, Walk, Run. • UTM starting in low Risk Environment • To be conducted at Stead Airport in Reno, Nevada • 2500 to 10, 000 Operations per month • Community Recognition of Jobs creation possibilities Trial Goals • Examine “system” ability to respond to Contingencies • Vehicle, GCS • UTM System • Fused UTM and ATM System • UTM is cloud based: Examining QoS • Miniature ADSB System • Obstacles: LegacyVs New Age companies • Raft of Separation Issues: Non Cooperative Participants, GPS Anomalies Block 2 Trials
  • 13. Build 3: Jan 2018 • Drone ControlVia INTERNET • Communication • Drone to Drone • Drone to ATC • Safe Separation • BLOS • Flight over Moderate Population • Package Delivery Build 4: March 2019 • Flight over Urban Areas • High Density DroneTraffic • Autonomous D to D communication • Large Scale Contingency MGT
  • 14. Prepared by :Terrence Martin NASA UAS Traffic Management • Vehicle toVehicle communications • Universal Drone Registration database • Open identification systems • Tamper proof flight recorders • Up to date 3D Mapping-Obstacles • Dynamic weather information Ongoing UTM Research
  • 15. Prepared by :Terrence Martin NASA Looking for Partners to Help Make UTM a Reality Source: http://www.unmannedsystemsaustralia.com.au/latestnews/?p=1220
  • 16. Prepared by :Terrence Martin NASA Looking for Partners to Help Make UTM a Reality Source: http://www.unmannedsystemsaustralia.com.au/latestnews/?p=1220
  • 17. Prepared by :Terrence Martin NASA Looking for Partners to Help Make UTM a Reality Source: http://www.unmannedsystemsaustralia.com.au/latestnews/?p=1220
  • 18. Prepared by :Terrence Martin NASA Looking for Partners to Help Make UTM a Reality Source: http://www.unmannedsystemsaustralia.com.au/latestnews/?p=1220 How Self Healing will these networks be? How will QoS be determined and delivered>
  • 19. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Disruption Google & Facebook: Next Gen Content Distribution http://www.youtube.com/user/ProjectLoon Recent payloads delivering 22MB/sec to ground antenna & 5 MB to handset “muscle behind the balloon effort is comparable to other Google X projects like Glass or self-driving cars”.
  • 20. Prepared by :Terrence Martin DISRUPTIONS • Google & Facebook battling to control information distribution & social media to 5BN people who don’t have “proper” internet access • Both companies have a significant interest in expediting the delivery • Googles Android captured 79% of world wide market • More people = greater revenue. • Some scepticism about motivation: providing service to Africa doesn’t make cost sense • Definite Social benefits: medical/farming advice, weather • Project Loon: High altitude (Stratospheric) balloons tested in NZ, California and Brazil. Google & Facebook http://www.techtimes.com/articles/15684/20140917/google-wants-to-test-drones-that-deliver-internet-access-in-new-mexico.htm
  • 21. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Disruption • Balloons at the mercy of weather, harder to control, and durability concerns • Are safer if they fall to earth • Cost significantly less. Google & Facebook: Next-Gen Content Distribution GoogleTitan
  • 22. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Disruption • Balloons at the mercy of weather, harder to control, and durability concerns • Are safer if they fall to earth • Cost significantly less. • Google & Facebook investigating using high altitude, long endurance solar UAVs. • Google trumped Facebook in purchasingTitan Aerospace ($60M). • Developing 2 dragon-fly shaped UAVs. • Smaller variant has wingspan larger than Boeing 767 Google & Facebook: Next-Gen Content Distribution GoogleTitan
  • 23. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Disruption • Balloons at the mercy of weather, harder to control, and durability concerns • Are safer if they fall to earth • Cost significantly less. • Google & Facebook investigating using high altitude, long endurance solar UAVs. • Google trumped Facebook in purchasingTitan Aerospace ($60M). • Developing 2 dragon-fly shaped UAVs. • Smaller variant has wingspan larger than Boeing 767 Google & Facebook: Next-Gen Content Distribution GoogleTitan Facebook Aquila http://www.theguardian.com/ • Facebook purchased Ascenta ($20M)
  • 24. Multiple Ad-Hoc Networks Multi-hop wireless network: each network node acts as a wireless terminal as well as a router Cost effective positioning of assets according to requirements: • nodes have the flexibility to manouver to meet dynamic demand. Key R&D focus areas include: • Mobility Models: plays a significant role in network performance • Trajectory planning & prediction • Collision Detection and avoidance: multiple trajectories • Routing protocols that discover & adjust to network topology
  • 25. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Multiple Ad-Hoc Networks Swarms
  • 26. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Multiple Adhoc Networks Swarms VIDEO PLAYED at LINK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQIMGV5vtd4
  • 27. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Disruption Swarms 1. J. Arquilla, D. Ronfeldt, RAND: “Swarming & the future Conflict”. 1. J. Arquilla, D. Ronfeldt, RAND: “Swarming & the future Conflict”.
  • 28. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Swarms Military Applications
  • 30. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Motivation Google Cars are super Cautious SOURCE: http://theoatmeal.com/blog/google_self_driving_car SOURCE: http://www.google.com/images GEEK HUMOUR ENDLESS DOWHILE LOOP
  • 31. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Motivation Google Cars Sensors
  • 32. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Motivation Google Cars Sensors VLP-64 LIDAR on Google Car Flow Down Benefit: VLP-16 –LiDAR Puck: • 16-channel real-time • $7,999 • 600 grams. • Range: 300m
  • 33. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Motivation Google Cars Sensors Radar System • Information fused with LIDAR • 24GHz • 300 metres Range • Positioned on Bumper at front and red sides Used for: • Detecting oncoming vehicles parameters • Self parking • blind spot detection • Pre-cash avoidance
  • 34. ”It’s not competition which counts, but competition from the new commodity, new technology, new source of supply, new type of organisation - competition which commands a decisive cost or quality advantage and which strikes not at the profit margins and outputs of the existing firms but at their very foundations”: Joseph Schumpeter
  • 35. ”It’s not competition which counts, but competition from the new commodity, new technology, new source of supply, new type of organisation - competition which commands a decisive cost or quality advantage and which strikes not at the profit margins and outputs of the existing firms but at their very foundations”: Joseph Schumpeter
  • 36. Source: http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/the-robots-are-coming-to-take-your-job/ ”It’s not competition which counts, but competition from the new commodity, new technology, new source of supply, new type of organisation - competition which commands a decisive cost or quality advantage and which strikes not at the profit margins and outputs of the existing firms but at their very foundations”: Joseph Schumpeter NYT Best Seller: • Increased impact of automation
  • 37. Source: http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/the-robots-are-coming-to-take-your-job/ ”It’s not competition which counts, but competition from the new commodity, new technology, new source of supply, new type of organisation - competition which commands a decisive cost or quality advantage and which strikes not at the profit margins and outputs of the existing firms but at their very foundations”: Joseph Schumpeter NYT Best Seller: • Increased impact of automation Moving from ”Smokestack & Manufacturing Economies” to ”Consumption, Services and HighValue Technologies”
  • 40. The BADThe GOOD There will be WINNERS & LOSERS
  • 42. The BADThe GOOD Companies & Cities & Nations There will be WINNERS & LOSERS How is Australia positioned?
  • 43. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Osborne & Frey, Citigroup Studies by : Carl Frey & Michael Osborne, then Citigroup • Advances in AI, Robotics, Data Mining, Machine Learning, Computational Statistics are placing more jobs at Risk of being Automated. High risk for • United States- 47% of workers • China - 77% of workers • India - 69% of workers • Automation may change the trend of offshoring to low cost regions • Less low end manufacturing, more innovative technology development • Emerging Markets need to diversify to move up the value chain High Risk of Jobs being Replaced by Automation
  • 44. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Computerisation & Jobs Market Next Decades Source: Frey, Carl Benedikt and Michael Osborne. September 17, 2013. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation? University of Oxford
  • 45. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Computerisation & Jobs Market Next Decades Management Engineering/ Science Education, Law, Arts, Media Healthcare Source: Frey, Carl Benedikt and Michael Osborne. September 17, 2013. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation? University of Oxford LOW RISK
  • 46. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Computerisation & Jobs Market Next Decades Management Engineering/ Science Education, Law, Arts, Media Healthcare Installation, Maintenance Source: Frey, Carl Benedikt and Michael Osborne. September 17, 2013. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation? University of Oxford LOW RISK MEDIUM RISK
  • 47. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Computerisation & Jobs Market Next Decades Management Engineering/ Science Education, Law, Arts, Media Healthcare Service Sales Office and admin. support Installation, Maintenance Source: Frey, Carl Benedikt and Michael Osborne. September 17, 2013. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation? University of Oxford LOW RISK MEDIUM RISK HIGH RISK
  • 48. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Computerisation & Jobs Market Next Decades Management Engineering/ Science Education, Law, Arts, Media Healthcare Service Sales Office and admin. support Transportation Installation, Maintenance Source: Frey, Carl Benedikt and Michael Osborne. September 17, 2013. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation? University of Oxford LOW RISK MEDIUM RISK HIGH RISK
  • 49. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Disruption, Automation and Innovation Percentage of Jobs at High Risk of Automation 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
  • 50. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Disruption, Automation and Innovation Percentage of Jobs at High Risk of Automation 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Least at Risk • Technically Dynamic, Knowledge Centres • Diversified & skill intensive workforces • Professional Services • Creative Industries
  • 51. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Disruption, Automation and Innovation Percentage of Jobs at High Risk of Automation 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Least at Risk • Technically Dynamic, Knowledge Centres • Diversified & skill intensive workforces • Professional Services • Creative Industries Most at Risk • Manufacturing, Energy • Banking • Gaming, Low Level white & Blue collar
  • 52. City State % Jobs at Risk Kurri Kurri NSW 58.6 Murray Bridge SA 57.3 Cessnock NSW 57.1 Melton VIC 56.8 Muswellbrook NSW 56.4 Warwick QLD 56.4 Port Pirie SA 55.3% Griffith QLD 55.3 Colac VIC 54.9 Moe-Newborough VIC 54.7 SOURCE: Bernard Salt, KPMG Disruption, Automation and Innovation Percentage of Jobs at High Risk of Automation: Australia
  • 53. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Innovations Ageing Corporations Source: http://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/corporate- australias-real-problem-ancient-companies-20151125-gl7wu2.html “Innovation, by it's very nature, involves taking risks. “I'm not sure an anchor tenant that is a 105- year old company is going to attract start-ups and venture capital to create a tech hub”, Scott Farquar, Co-Founder Atlassian
  • 54. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Ageing Corporations United States 89% 11% US Market Capitilisation by Company Age 2005 Over 85 Years Old Microsoft
  • 55. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Ageing Corporations United States 89% 11% US Market Capitilisation by Company Age 2005 Over 85 Years Old Microsoft 18% 14% 11% 8%8% 41% US Market Capitalisation by Company Age 2015 Apple Google Microsoft Amazon Facebook Over 50 Years Old
  • 56. Prepared by :Terrence Martin 11% 7% 6% 76% AUS Market Capitalisation by Company Age 2005 Westpac Westfield Telstra Aging Corporations Australia
  • 57. Prepared by :Terrence Martin 11% 7% 6% 76% AUS Market Capitalisation by Company Age 2005 Westpac Westfield Telstra Aging Corporations Australia 8% 92% AUS Market Capitalisation by Company Age 2015 Telstra Over 85 Years Old
  • 58. Prepared by :Terrence Martin 11% 7% 6% 76% AUS Market Capitalisation by Company Age 2005 Westpac Westfield Telstra Aging Corporations Australia 8% 92% AUS Market Capitalisation by Company Age 2015 Telstra Over 85 Years Old Dominated by Banks Supermarket & Commodities
  • 59. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Which Businesses Creates Jobs? Kauffman foundation • “Existing firms actually lose a million more jobs, per year, then they create.” • Over last 25 years, almost all private sector jobs are created by businesses less than 5 years old • Between 1988 & 2011, companies more than 5 years old, DESTROYED more jobs than they create
  • 60. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Which Businesses Creates Jobs? Kauffman foundation • “Existing firms actually lose a million more jobs, per year, then they create.” • Over last 25 years, almost all private sector jobs are created by businesses less than 5 years old • Between 1988 & 2011, companies more than 5 years old, DESTROYED more jobs than they create US Bureau of Economic Research • “The younger companies are, the more jobs they create, regardless of size”
  • 61. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Which Businesses Creates Jobs? Kauffman foundation • “Existing firms actually lose a million more jobs, per year, then they create.” • Over last 25 years, almost all private sector jobs are created by businesses less than 5 years old • Between 1988 & 2011, companies more than 5 years old, DESTROYED more jobs than they create US Bureau of Economic Research • “The younger companies are, the more jobs they create, regardless of size” Washington Post • “Once large enough, firms start hunting overseas for cheaper labour options”, • “Small companies produce 16 time more patents per worker than large firms”, and this is typically associated with an infusion of jobs creation, • Level of jobs creation linked to level of R&D, and collaboration
  • 62. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Ageing Corporations Comparison 89% 11% US Market Capitilisation by Company Age 2005 Over 85 Years Old Microsoft 11% 7% 6% 76% AUS Market Capitalisation by Company Age 2005 Westpac Westfield Telstra Over 80 Years Old 8% 92% AUS Market Capitalisation by Company Age 2015 Telstra Over 85 Years Old 18% 14% 11% 8%8% 41% US Market Capitalisation by Company Age 2015 Apple Google Microsoft Amazon Facebook Over 41 Years Old
  • 63. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Ageing Corporations Comparison 89% 11% US Market Capitilisation by Company Age 2005 Over 85 Years Old Microsoft 11% 7% 6% 76% AUS Market Capitalisation by Company Age 2005 Westpac Westfield Telstra Over 80 Years Old 8% 92% AUS Market Capitalisation by Company Age 2015 Telstra Over 85 Years Old 18% 14% 11% 8%8% 41% US Market Capitalisation by Company Age 2015 Apple Google Microsoft Amazon Facebook Over 41 Years Old Corporate Australia is • “Ancient” with slow moving inertia • "deeply risk-averse" and "dominated by rent-seeking oligopolists“, which is increasingly troubles our policy makers., Fairfax Media's Jessica Irvine Old, large corporations become increasingly risk averse over their life spans. They rise to the challenge of innovative competitors by putting larger barriers in place rather than innovating themselves. Look at the behaviour of the coal industry, supermarkets and the taxi industry all trying to get the government to make it more difficult for new entrants”
  • 64. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Our Banking & Real Estate Sector Australia's banking sector has a high reliance on overseas funding. • Underpins the funding for our real estate market Our 1 trillion foreign debt • twice the size of our income from exports, dividends and royalties • This ratio more than any other country except Greece & US • Oz is spending 5.6% of its foreign income meeting interest payments, more than any other advanced country aside from Spain and at similar levels to Mexico • Credit ratings agency considering loweringAustralia's rating from AAA • Concern that if global financial market lose confidence in Australia, it will be difficult for government and banks to refinance Debt The Australian Newspaper 12 May 2016
  • 65. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Supporting Innovation Ingredients of supportive business ecosystem for innovation & job creation[1]: • A pro-entrepreneurship culture • Guidance from experienced entrepreneurs • A supportive Regulatory Environment • A collaborative Business Culture • Visible Successes & Role Models • RiskTolerance • Available Capital • Technical Skills Key Ingredients for Innovation & Start-ups [1] Startup AUS Crossroads 2015: http://startupaus.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Crossroads-2015.pdf
  • 66. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Summary So Far • Concerning signs that Australian Economy is skewed with Aging Companies, • Government push for Innovation • UAVs offering up great potential, …. maybe even some jobs • Key to Innovation is the right conditions, INCLUDING a supportive Regulatory BODY • Supportive DOES NOT MEAN bypassing safety
  • 68. Prepared by :Terrence Martin The Australian Framework RPAS Regulation Updates • CASR Part 101: Commenced 1 July 2002 • CASA reviewing & modernising CASR Part 101 • Phase 1: • Amendments to CASR Part 101 to be in Force Sep 2016 • Incorporates new framework derived from EASA • Suite of Advisory Circulars under development • Developing Manual of Standards
  • 69. Prepared by :Terrence Martin The Australian Framework Australia: “Close Following” Certified Specific Open Restricted Specific Small RPAS Very small RPAS Toys European Approach Australian Draft Framework Regulated Specific Open Standard Restricted Specific Limited Small RPAS Very small RPAS EASA CONOPS: safe, proportional and operation-centric approach.
  • 70. Prepared by :Terrence Martin The Australian Framework RPAS Regulation Updates • CASR Part 101: Commenced 1 July 2002 • CASA reviewing & modernising CASR Part 101 • Phase 1: • Amendments to CASR Part 101 to be in Force Sep 2016 • Incorporates hooks for new framework derived from EASA • Suite of Advisory Circulars under development • Developing Manual of Standards • Phase 2: complete re-write of RPAS regulation  CASR Part 102
  • 71. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Regulated Specific Open Small RPAS Very small RPAS Element of Initial Airworthiness CPA like Oversight of Integrity. NAA led Industry Appointed Oversight No Integrity Oversight Operational Restrictions CASA Airworthiness Framework Operational Airworthiness
  • 72. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Regulated Specific Open Small RPAS Very small RPAS Element of Initial Airworthiness CPA like Oversight of Integrity. NAA led Industry Appointed Oversight No Integrity Oversight Operational Restrictions Proportionate &SAFE: Operational Restrictions commensurate with technical integrity & operational environment CASA Airworthiness Framework Operational Airworthiness
  • 73. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Regulated Specific Open Small RPAS Very small RPAS Element of Initial Airworthiness CPA like Oversight of Integrity. NAA led Industry Appointed Oversight No Integrity Oversight Operational Restrictions Enter the US Element Derivative of US sUAS NPRM CASA Airworthiness Framework Operational Airworthiness
  • 74. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Regulated Specific Open Small RPAS Very small RPAS Element of Initial Airworthiness CPA like Oversight of Integrity. NAA led Industry Appointed Oversight No Integrity Oversight Operational Restrictions Enter the US Element Derivative of US sUAS NPRM Open = Small SegregatedVLOS Container CASA Airworthiness Framework Operational Airworthiness
  • 75. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Regulated Specific Open Small RPAS Very small RPAS Element of Initial Airworthiness No Integrity Oversight Operational Restrictions  Line of Sight operations only  DAYVFR  Below 400 ft AGL  limited levels of autonomy permissible but must be able to override • MTOM ≤ 25kg • V < 87 KCAS • Qualified Operator • Not over people • MTOM ≤ 2kg  V < 30 KCAS  Frangible Materials  Operations over people allowed CASA Airworthiness Framework Operational Airworthiness
  • 76. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CONOPS Consideration Standard Restricted Specific Limited Over population etc Controlled Airspace BVLOS IFR Conditions Above 400 feet AGL Within 3 NM of Aerodrome The Australian Framework Work Outstanding Regulated Specific
  • 77. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CONOPS Consideration Standard Restricted Specific Limited Over population etc Controlled Airspace BVLOS IFR Conditions Above 400 feet AGL Within 3 NM of Aerodrome The Australian Framework Work Outstanding Regulated Specific
  • 78. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CONOPS Consideration Standard Restricted Specific Limited Over population etc Controlled Airspace BVLOS IFR Conditions Above 400 feet AGL Within 3 NM of Aerodrome Airworthiness Expectations based on CPA Regulations e.g.TC/CoA The Australian Framework Work Outstanding Regulated Specific
  • 79. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CONOPS Consideration Standard Restricted Specific Limited Over population etc Controlled Airspace BVLOS IFR Conditions Above 400 feet AGL Within 3 NM of Aerodrome The Australian Framework Work Outstanding Regulated Specific
  • 80. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CONOPS Consideration Standard Restricted Specific Limited Over population etc Controlled Airspace BVLOS IFR Conditions Above 400 feet AGL Within 3 NM of Aerodrome The Australian Framework Work Outstanding Regulated Specific Work to be done • What Equipment • What Restrictions • What Procedures • WhatTraining • How is RISK Assessed?
  • 81. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CONOPS Consideration Standard Restricted Specific Limited Over population etc Controlled Airspace BVLOS IFR Conditions Above 400 feet AGL Within 3 NM of Aerodrome The Australian Framework Work Outstanding Regulated Specific
  • 82. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CONOPS Consideration Standard Restricted Specific Limited Over population etc Controlled Airspace BVLOS IFR Conditions Above 400 feet AGL Within 3 NM of Aerodrome The Australian Framework Work Outstanding Regulated Specific Operational Flexibility Platform Technical Integrity Equipage Operator Competence
  • 84. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Key Problems • Accelerated Regulatory Development needs a Cultural Change • Lack of Roadmap • More People with the right skills • Uncertainty/Disagreement around Scope ofWork Summary of Issues
  • 85. KEYPROBLEMS ChangingtheCulture “If you always do what you always did, you always get what you always got”,….or Definition of insanity…….you know the rest!
  • 86. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Key Problems CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
  • 87. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Key Problems CASA Sub-Committee Plenary No Consultation, Too Many Surprises NoTransparent Vision or Plan
  • 88. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Key Problems CASA Sub-Committee Plenary No Consultation, Too Many Surprises Industry Disengagement NoTransparent Vision or Plan
  • 89. Prepared by :Terrence Martin No Consultation, Too Many Surprises Industry Disengagement NoTransparent Vision or Plan Key Problem CASA Sub-Committee Plenary Communication andTrust.
  • 90. Prepared by :Terrence Martin No Consultation, Too Many Surprises Fragmented Availability Industry Disengagement NoTransparent Vision or Plan Key Problem CASA Sub-Committee Plenary UASSC Observers/Workers Industry has DAY JOBS Communication andTrust.
  • 91. Prepared by :Terrence Martin No Consultation, Too Many Surprises Volunteer Workforce Fragmented Availability Industry Disengagement NoTransparent Vision or Plan Key Problem CASA Sub-Committee Plenary UASSC Observers/Workers Industry has DAY JOBS Communication andTrust.
  • 92. Prepared by :Terrence Martin No Consultation, Too Many Surprises Volunteer Workforce Fragmented Availability Industry Disengagement NoTransparent Vision or Plan Limited, unreliable Industry Contribution Key Problem CASA Sub-Committee Plenary UASSC Observers/Workers Industry has DAY JOBS Communication andTrust.
  • 93. Prepared by :Terrence Martin No Consultation, Too Many Surprises Volunteer Workforce Fragmented Availability Industry Disengagement NoTransparent Vision or Plan Limited, unreliable Industry Contribution Reduced Overall Workforce Key Problem CASA Sub-Committee Plenary UASSC Observers/Workers Industry has DAY JOBS Communication andTrust.
  • 94. Prepared by :Terrence Martin No Consultation, Too Many Surprises Volunteer Workforce Fragmented Availability Fragmented &/or Delayed Feedback Industry Disengagement NoTransparent Vision or Plan Limited, unreliable Industry Contribution Reduced Overall Workforce Key Problem CASA Sub-Committee Plenary UASSC Observers/Workers Industry has DAY JOBS Communication andTrust.
  • 95. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Industry Disengagement Reduced Overall Workforce Key Problem CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
  • 96. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CASA: Limited Workforce Industry Disengagement Reduced Overall Workforce Key Problem CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
  • 97. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CASA: Limited Workforce CASA: Management & Public Expectations Industry Disengagement Deadlines Reduced Overall Workforce Key Problem CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
  • 98. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CASA: Limited Workforce CASA: Management & Public Expectations Industry Disengagement CASA: Time Poor Deadlines Reduced Overall Workforce Key Problem CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
  • 99. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CASA: Limited Workforce CASA: Management & Public Expectations Industry Disengagement CASA: Time Poor Deadlines Reduced Overall Workforce Fragmented &/or Delayed Feedback Key Problem CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
  • 100. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CASA: Limited Workforce CASA: Management & Public Expectations Industry Disengagement CASA: Time Poor Deadlines Reduced Overall Workforce Loadshed, shortcuts, Bypass Fragmented &/or Delayed Feedback Key Problem CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
  • 101. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CASA: Limited Workforce CASA: Management & Public Expectations Industry Disengagement CASA: Time Poor Deadlines Reduced Overall Workforce Loadshed, shortcuts, Bypass High Latency Doc Development Fragmented &/or Delayed Feedback Key Problem CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
  • 102. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CASA: Limited Workforce CASA: Management & Public Expectations Fragmented &/or Delayed Feedback CASA: Time Poor Deadlines Reduced Overall Workforce Loadshed, shortcuts, Bypass High Latency Doc Development Key Complaints CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
  • 103. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CASA: Limited Workforce CASA: Management & Public Expectations Reduced Consultation Fragmented &/or Delayed Feedback CASA: Time Poor Deadlines Reduced Overall Workforce Loadshed, shortcuts, Bypass High Latency Doc Development Key Complaints CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
  • 104. Prepared by :Terrence Martin No Consultation, Too Many Surprises CASA: Limited Workforce CASA: Management & Public Expectations Reduced Consultation Fragmented &/or Delayed Feedback CASA: Time Poor Deadlines Reduced Overall Workforce Loadshed, shortcuts, Bypass High Latency Doc Development Negative Reinforcement Key Complaints CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
  • 105. Prepared by :Terrence Martin No Consultation, Too Many Surprises CASA: Limited Workforce CASA: Management & Public Expectations Reduced Consultation Fragmented &/or Delayed Feedback CASA: Time Poor Deadlines Reduced Overall Workforce Loadshed, shortcuts, Bypass High Latency Doc Development Industry Disengagement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Key Complaints CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
  • 106. Prepared by :Terrence Martin No Consultation, Too Many Surprises CASA: Limited Workforce CASA: Management & Public Expectations Reduced Consultation Fragmented &/or Delayed Feedback Limited, unreliable Industry Contribution CASA: Time Poor Deadlines Reduced Overall Workforce Loadshed, shortcuts, Bypass High Latency Doc Development Industry Disengagement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Key Complaints CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
  • 107. Prepared by :Terrence Martin No Consultation, Too Many Surprises CASA: Limited Workforce CASA: Management & Public Expectations Reduced Consultation Fragmented &/or Delayed Feedback Limited, unreliable Industry Contribution CASA: Time Poor Deadlines Reduced Overall Workforce Loadshed, shortcuts, Bypass High Latency Doc Development Industry Disengagement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Key Complaints CASA Sub-Committee Plenary
  • 108. Prepared by :Terrence Martin No Consultation, Too Many Surprises CASA: Limited Workforce CASA: Management & Public Expectations Reduced Consultation Fragmented &/or Delayed Feedback Limited, unreliable Industry Contribution CASA: Time Poor Deadlines Reduced Overall Workforce Loadshed, shortcuts, Bypass High Latency Doc Development Industry Disengagement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Key Complaints CASA Sub-Committee Plenary TRUST COMMUNICATION SHORT-TERM ACTIONS A LONGTERM PLAN
  • 110. KEYPROBLEMS ThelackofaRoadmap “AVision without a plan is just a dream” A plan without people….again a dream!
  • 111. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Key Problem The Lack of a Roadmap • Industry want to start BVLOS, …..Soon • Current rate of progress not satisfactory if we want to maximise benefits for country • Potential Investors lose confidence: take their money elsewhere • Regulatory INACTION has a real price for our nation • First Moving Nations gain a competitive edge: • Setup right Environment for Innovation The Crossroads
  • 112. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Key Problem The Lack of a Roadmap: The Crossroads The Crossroads
  • 113. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Key Problem The Lack of a Roadmap: The Crossroads The Crossroads CASA Resources are finite  Insufficient to examine all the elements that go into integrating UAS into NAS
  • 114. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Key Problem The Lack of a Roadmap: The Crossroads The Crossroads CASA Resources are finite  Insufficient to examine all the elements that go into integrating UAS into NAS Adopted Close Follower Approach BUT beholden to European timeframes
  • 115. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Key Problem The Lack of a Roadmap: The Crossroads The Crossroads CASA Resources are finite  Insufficient to examine all the elements that go into integrating UAS into NAS Adopted Close Follower Approach BUT beholden to European timeframes US and Europe both have publically available Roadmaps & Plan. Australia does not!
  • 116. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Key Problem The Lack of a Roadmap: The Crossroads The Crossroads CASA Resources are finite  Insufficient to examine all the elements that go into integrating UAS into NAS Adopted Close Follower Approach BUT beholden to European timeframes What elements will be Australianised? • Australian specific safety implications, • Economic priorities, • Technical areas of uncertainty R&D we must perform • Gaps in national capacity US and Europe both have publically available Roadmaps & Plan. Australia does not!
  • 118.
  • 119.
  • 120.
  • 121. BVLOS
  • 122. BVLOS SEGREGATION is a tenuous Strategy for BVLOS NOTAMS ……Really ???
  • 123. BVLOS SEGREGATION is a tenuous Strategy for BVLOS NOTAMS ……Really ???
  • 124. BVLOS SEGREGATION is a tenuous Strategy for BVLOS NOTAMS ……Really ??? ATM and Airspace Integration Operational contingency procedures and systems Data communication links incl. spectrum issues Detect & Avoid systems Methodology for Determining Risk
  • 125. BVLOS SEGREGATION is a tenuous Strategy for BVLOS NOTAMS ……Really ??? Oh …. And Integrity Requirements for flight over people
  • 126. BVLOS SEGREGATION is a tenuous Strategy for BVLOS NOTAMS ……Really ???
  • 127. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Uncertainty about Scope of Work Close Following Certified Specific Open Restricted Specific Small RPAS Very small RPAS Toys European Approach Australian Draft Framework Regulated Specific Open Standard Restricted Specific Limited Small RPAS Very small RPAS EASA CONOPS: safe, proportional and operation-centric approach.
  • 128. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Uncertainty about Scope of Work Roadmap identifies all the issues necessary to integrate RPAS into the NAS and established a step by step process. Includes 3 Annexes: • Annex A- Regulatory Approach: • Identifies improvements to existing regulatory framework • Annex B- Strategic Research Plan • Identifies technology enablers and necessary R&D • Annex C- Study on Societal Impact The European Exemplar Goals Milestones Gaps & Barriers Action Items Priorities &Timelines A vision without a plan is just a dream, …
  • 129. Prepared by :Terrence Martin EC 1 Justify & Validate RPAS Safety Objective EC 2 Secure C2, Datalinks & Bandwidth EC 3 RPAS Integration into ATM, DAA and SA EC 4 Security EC 5 Safe Automation & Predictable Behaviours EC 6 Automated Take Off & Landing, Surface Operations European Roadmap: Annex B Understanding the Scope of Work
  • 130. EC 1 Justify &Validate RPAS Safety Objective EC 2 EC 4 EC 5 EC 6EC 3
  • 131. EC 1.1 Validation Current ATM suitability EC 1 Justify &Validate RPAS Safety Objective EC 2 EC 4 EC 5 EC 6EC 3 EC 1.1 Validation Current ATM suitability EC 1.2 LongTerm Validation Future ATM compatibility
  • 132. EC 1.1 Validation Current ATM suitability EC 1 Justify &Validate RPAS Safety Objective EC 2 EC 4 EC 5 EC 6EC 3 EC 1.1 Validation Current ATM suitability EC 1.2 LongTerm Validation Future ATM compatibility Minimum Safety Objectives In CTAOver People OCTA Separation Collision Avoidance Comms Trials & Demos
  • 133. EC 1 Justify &Validate RPAS Safety Objective EC 2 EC 4 EC 5 EC 6EC 3 EC 1.2 LongTerm ATM Compatibility EC 1.1 Validation Current ATM suitability
  • 134. EC 1 Justify &Validate RPAS Safety Objective EC 2 EC 4 EC 5 EC 6EC 3 EC 1.2 LongTerm ATM Compatibility EC 1.1 Validation Current ATM suitability Conflict Management Traffic Avoidance Collision Avoidance Communication Navigation ADS-B Ops in CTA & OCTA
  • 135. EC 2 Secure C2, Datalinks & Bandwidth EC 2 EC 4 EC 5 EC 6EC 3
  • 136. EC 2 Secure C2, Datalinks & Bandwidth EC 2 EC 4 EC 5 EC 6EC 3 EC 2.2 RLOS & BRLOS Infrastructure EC 2.1 Secure C2 Systems & Links EC 2.3 Radio Bandwidth Management
  • 137. EC 2 Secure C2, Datalinks & Bandwidth EC 2 EC 4 EC 5 EC 6EC 3 EC 2.2 RLOS & BRLOS Infrastructure EC 2.1 Secure C2 Systems & Links Satellite BRLOS Aerial Relay BRLOS Ground Network Range Extension Data Rates, Frequency bandwidths Redundancy On-board Equipment Requirements Antennas EC 2.3 Radio Bandwidth Management Spectrum Availability DAA Impact & QoS Standardisation
  • 138. EC 3 RPAS Integration into ATM, DAA & Situational Awareness EC 2 EC 4 EC 5 EC 6EC 2 EC 3.1 ATM Interfaces for NextGen, SESAR, OneSky EC 3.1 ATM Interfaces & Ops where Aircraft are Cooperative 4-D Mission Trajectory ADS-B GNSS Datalinks EC 3.3 Airborne DAA DAA, C2, Avionics Integration DAA Performance in OCTA DAA for Small UAVs TLS for Immature DAA Solutions EC 3.4 Ground DAA EC 3.5 GCS HMI EC 3.6 Obstacles EC 3.7 Weather EC 3.8 UAV Detectability EC 3.9 Pilot & Observer Respons. EC 3.10 Other Hazards
  • 139. And on, and on , and on……
  • 140. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Uncertainty about Scope of Work Europe: Copying their Homework Goals Milestones Gaps & Barriers Task List Priorities,Timelines, People Operational & Technology gaps: 1. Integration into ATM and Airspace environments 2. Surface operations incl. take-off and landing 3. Operational contingency procedures and systems 4. Data communication links incl. spectrum issues 5. Detect & Avoid systems and operational procedures 6. Security issues 7. Verification and Validation Methods
  • 141. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Uncertainty about Scope of Work United States Identified R&D Areas/Gaps Airspace Operations • Develop Integrated Separation Concepts • Develop Airspace Integration Safety Cases • Develop SAA Sensors & Fusion Requires • Develop Separation Algorithms • AssessAvailability/Quality of Surveillance Data • Safe and EfficientTerminal Airspace & Surface Operations Unmanned Aircraft • State Awareness and RealTime Mission Management • Airframe Certification • Precise Location & Navigation • UAS Avionics & Control Systems Certification Communications • Impact of UAS Ops on NextGen comms systems • Availability of UAS Control frequency Spectrum • Develop &Validate UAS Control System Performance Requirement • Ensure security of safety critical comms with civil UAS • Design & Develop UAS Control Datalink for allocated frequency spectrum bands Human Systems Integration • DisplayTraffic/airspace information • Effective Human Automation Interaction • Pilot Centric GCS • Definition Roles and Responsibilities • Predictability & Contingency Mgt • System Level Issues • Support for Future Capability of UAS
  • 142. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Uncertainty about Scope of Work Europe: Technology and Operational Gaps Operational & Technology gaps: 1. Integration into ATM and Airspace environments 2. Surface operations incl. take-off and landing 3. Operational contingency procedures and systems 4. Data communication links incl. spectrum issues 5. Detect & Avoid systems and operational procedures 6. Security issues 7. Verification and Validation Methods
  • 143. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Uncertainty about Scope of Work Europe: Technology and Operational Gaps 14 Key R&D Activities: • EVLOS/VLOS • 1.RPAS activities awareness for security • 2. Operations in Urban Areas • 3. Human Factors • IFR/VFR • 4. Visual Detectability solutions • 5. DAA • 6. Comms C2 Datalink • 7. Airspace & Airport Access • 8 Contingency • BVLOS • 9. DAA • 10. Comms C2 Datalink • 11 Airspace & Airport Access • 12. Security • 13 Human Factors: BVLOS & IFR/VFR • 14 Best Practice Demonstration GAPS LINKED TO ACTION & MILESTONES Operational & Technology gaps: 1. Integration into ATM and Airspace environments 2. Surface operations incl. take-off and landing 3. Operational contingency procedures and systems 4. Data communication links incl. spectrum issues 5. Detect & Avoid systems and operational procedures 6. Security issues 7. Verification and Validation Methods
  • 144. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Uncertainty about Scope of Work Europe: Technology and Operational Gaps 14 Key R&D Activities: • EVLOS/VLOS • 1.RPAS activities awareness for security • 2. Operations in Urban Areas • 3. Human Factors • IFR/VFR • 4. Visual Detectability solutions • 5. DAA • 6. Comms C2 Datalink • 7. Airspace & Airport Access • 8 Contingency • BVLOS • 9. DAA • 10. Comms C2 Datalink • 11 Airspace & Airport Access • 12. Security • 13 Human Factors: BVLOS & IFR/VFR • 14 Best Practice Demonstration GAPS LINKED TO ACTION & MILESTONES Operational & Technology gaps: 1. Integration into ATM and Airspace environments 2. Surface operations incl. take-off and landing 3. Operational contingency procedures and systems 4. Data communication links incl. spectrum issues 5. Detect & Avoid systems and operational procedures 6. Security issues 7. Verification and Validation Methods Timelines & Difficulty Identified
  • 145. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Uncertainty about Scope of Work Europe: Technology and Operational Gaps 14 Key R&D Activities: • EVLOS/VLOS • 1.RPAS activities awareness for security • 2. Operations in Urban Areas • 3. Human Factors • IFR/VFR • 4. Visual Detectability solutions • 5. DAA • 6. Comms C2 Datalink • 7. Airspace & Airport Access • 8 Contingency • BVLOS • 9. DAA • 10. Comms C2 Datalink • 11 Airspace & Airport Access • 12. Security • 13 Human Factors: BVLOS & IFR/VFR • 14 Best Practice Demonstration GAPS LINKED TO ACTION & MILESTONES Operational & Technology gaps: 1. Integration into ATM and Airspace environments 2. Surface operations incl. take-off and landing 3. Operational contingency procedures and systems 4. Data communication links incl. spectrum issues 5. Detect & Avoid systems and operational procedures 6. Security issues 7. Verification and Validation Methods Timelines & Difficulty Identified Re-OccurringThemes • Detect & Avoid • CNPC • ATM • Human Factors • Risk & Safety Management • Training
  • 146. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Uncertainty about Scope of Work The European Exemplar: Milestones, Priorities & Timelines 5.VFR 4. IFR 3. BVLOS 2. EVLOS 1.VLOS Priorities: Identifies 5 types of Operations: 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2023 2028 TimelinesMilestones Initial Integration Evolution
  • 147. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Uncertainty about Scope of Work European Strategic R& D
  • 148. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Uncertainty about Scope of Work European Roadmap: Breakdown for each Activity
  • 149. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Uncertainty about Scope of Work European Roadmap: Breakdown for each Activity RelatedTechnology Gaps: BVLOS DAA • EC Gap 3.3 Airborne DAA • EC Gap 3.4 Ground DAA • EC 3.8 Ground & Obstacle Avoidance • EC Gap 3.7Weather Detection • EC Gap 3.8 Detectability Solutions • EC Gap 3.10 Other Hazards Activity Related technology Gaps Context & Objectives Descriptions
  • 150. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Uncertainty about Scope of Work European Roadmap: Breakdown for each Activity RelatedTechnology Gaps: BVLOS DAA • EC Gap 3.3 Airborne DAA • EC Gap 3.4 Ground DAA • EC 3.8 Ground & Obstacle Avoidance • EC Gap 3.7Weather Detection • EC Gap 3.8 Detectability Solutions • EC Gap 3.10 Other Hazards Dependencies • DAA System Compatibility • Barometric System • TCAS/ACAS • ATM System Other Hazards Activity Related technology Gaps Context & Objectives Descriptions SESAR Implications Deliverables Key Dependencies Planning:WBS & Schedule
  • 151. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Uncertainty about Scope of Work European Roadmap: Breakdown for each Activity RelatedTechnology Gaps: BVLOS DAA • EC Gap 3.3 Airborne DAA • EC Gap 3.4 Ground DAA • EC 3.8 Ground & Obstacle Avoidance • EC Gap 3.7Weather Detection • EC Gap 3.8 Detectability Solutions • EC Gap 3.10 Other Hazards Dependencies • DAA System Compatibility • Barometric System • TCAS/ACAS • ATM System Other Hazards Required Expertise: DAA • Sensors (Cooperative & Non- Cooperative) • Sensor Integration, Blending, target tracking • System Architectures • Separation & Avoidance Logic, ACAS Logic • Operations • Information Processing Activity Related technology Gaps Context & Objectives Descriptions SESAR Implications Deliverables Key Dependencies Planning:WBS & Schedule Required Expertise Planning: Risk & opportunities
  • 152. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Uncertainty about Scope of Work Activity 14: • Establishing AvailableTechnologies • Supporting Industry Development •Supporting & Prioritising Development whichALSO helps: • the Regulatory Body accelerate regulation • Supports the Collective Good rather than Individual Business Interests Demonstrating Best Practice
  • 153. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Uncertainty about Scope of Work Activity 14: • Establishing AvailableTechnologies • Supporting Industry Development •Supporting & Prioritising Development whichALSO helps: • the Regulatory Body accelerate regulation • Supports the Collective Good rather than Individual Business Interests Demonstrating Best Practice This will be relevant when I talk about trials
  • 154. Key Questions • Do our operational priorities differ from US/Europe?
  • 155. Key Questions • Do our operational priorities differ from US/Europe? • Do we understand implications of their priorities & timelines?
  • 156. Key Questions • Do our operational priorities differ from US/Europe? • Do we understand implications of their priorities & timelines? • Is “Close Following” a conscious decision or really a “Wait & See” Strategy • If we don’t want to “close-follow”, how will the gaps be addressed  • What is being done to establish answers? • Who will pay the price? Operational & Technology gaps: 1. Integration into ATM and Airspace environments 2. Surface operations incl. take-off and landing 3. Operational contingency procedures and systems 4. Data communication links incl. spectrum issues 5. Detect & Avoid systems and operational procedures 6. Security issues 7. Verification and Validation Methods
  • 157. Key Questions • Do our operational priorities differ from US/Europe? • Do we understand implications of their priorities & timelines? • Which parts are relevant to Australia, which parts are not?
  • 158. Key Questions • Do our operational priorities differ from US/Europe? • Do we understand implications of their priorities & timelines? • Which parts are relevant to Australia, which parts are not? • What are our National UAV Priorities?
  • 159. Key Questions • Do our operational priorities differ from US/Europe? • Do we understand implications of their priorities & timelines? • Which parts are relevant to Australia, which parts are not? • What are our National UAV Priorities? • Agriculture, Mining, Emergency Services,…
  • 160. Key Questions • Do our operational priorities differ from US/Europe? • Do we understand implications of their priorities & timelines? • Which parts are relevant to Australia, which parts are not? • What are our National UAV Priorities? • Agriculture, Mining, Emergency Services,… • EVLOS, BVLOS, IFR/VFR 14 Key R&D Activities: • EVLOS/VLOS • 1.RPAS activities awareness for security • 2. Operations in Urban Areas • 3. Human Factors • IFR/VFR • 4. Visual Detectability solutions • 5. DAA • 7. CNPC • 9. Airspace & Airport Access • 11 Contingency • BVLOS • 6. DAA • 8. CNPC • 11 Airspace & Airport Access • Human Factors: • 13 BVLOS & IFR/VFR • 14 Best Practice Demonstration
  • 162. Key Questions • Where do we have the skills to: • Make decisions on what is relevant (C2, DAA, ATM)
  • 163. Key Questions • Where do we have the skills to: • Make decisions on what is relevant (C2, DAA, ATM) Required Expertise: DAA • Sensors (Cooperative & Non-Cooperative) • Sensor Integration, Blending, target tracking • System Architectures • Separation & Avoidance Logic,ACAS Logic • Operations • Information Processing • Aircraft Performance & Manoevreability • ATC
  • 164. Key Questions • Where do we have the skills to: • Make decisions on what is relevant (C2, DAA, ATM) Required Expertise: DAA • Sensors (Cooperative & Non-Cooperative) • Sensor Integration, Blending, target tracking • System Architectures • Separation & Avoidance Logic,ACAS Logic • Operations • Information Processing • Aircraft Performance & Manoevreability • ATC Required Expertise: CNPC • DigitalComms • Terrain, Urban, Obstacle Database Mgt • Comms, Nav, Surveillance (CNS) • EM Spectrum Environment & Measurement • Spectrum Management • SATCOM Infrastructure • Small UAVs • RCP, QoS, Safety & Security • GNSS • Modelling & Simulation • Advanced Control
  • 165. Key Questions • Where do we have the skills to: • Make decisions on what is relevant (C2, DAA, ATM) Required Expertise: DAA • Sensors (Cooperative & Non-Cooperative) • Sensor Integration, Blending, target tracking • System Architectures • Separation & Avoidance Logic,ACAS Logic • Operations • Information Processing • Aircraft Performance & Manoevreability • ATC Required Expertise: CNPC • DigitalComms • Terrain, Urban, Obstacle Database Mgt • Comms, Nav, Surveillance (CNS) • EM Spectrum Environment & Measurement • Spectrum Management • SATCOM Infrastructure • Small UAVs • RCP, QoS, Safety & Security • GNSS • Modelling & Simulation • Advanced Control Required Expertise: ATM & Operations • ATC & ATM Specialists • Flight Planning • Knowledge of ATM SurveillanceAssets • Knowledge of ATC Procedures & Services • Knowledge of NextGen, SESAR, OneSky • Operators • RPA End Users: Pilot & Payload • Small & Large • CPA Pilots • NewTechnologies: Airware, LATAS, UTM
  • 166. Key Questions • Where do we have the skills to: • Make decisions on what is relevant (C2, DAA, ATM) • Address particular gaps Required Expertise: DAA • Sensors (Cooperative & Non-Cooperative) • Sensor Integration, Blending, target tracking • System Architectures • Separation & Avoidance Logic,ACAS Logic • Operations • Information Processing • Aircraft Performance & Manoevreability • ATC Required Expertise: CNPC • DigitalComms • Terrain, Urban, Obstacle Database Mgt • Comms, Nav, Surveillance (CNS) • EM Spectrum Environment & Measurement • Spectrum Management • SATCOM Infrastructure • Small UAVs • RCP, QoS, Safety & Security • GNSS • Modelling & Simulation • Advanced Control Required Expertise: ATM & Operations • ATC & ATM Specialists • Flight Planning • Knowledge of ATM SurveillanceAssets • Knowledge of ATC Procedures & Services • Knowledge of NextGen, SESAR, OneSky • Operators • RPA End Users: Pilot & Payload • Small & Large • CPA Pilots • NewTechnologies: Airware, LATAS, UTM
  • 167. Key Questions • Where do we have the skills to: • Make decisions on what is relevant (C2, DAA, ATM) • Address particular gaps • Operational Procedure Generation Required Expertise: DAA • Sensors (Cooperative & Non-Cooperative) • Sensor Integration, Blending, target tracking • System Architectures • Separation & Avoidance Logic,ACAS Logic • Operations • Information Processing • Aircraft Performance & Manoevreability • ATC Required Expertise: CNPC • DigitalComms • Terrain, Urban, Obstacle Database Mgt • Comms, Nav, Surveillance (CNS) • EM Spectrum Environment & Measurement • Spectrum Management • SATCOM Infrastructure • Small UAVs • RCP, QoS, Safety & Security • GNSS • Modelling & Simulation • Advanced Control Required Expertise: ATM & Operations • ATC & ATM Specialists • Flight Planning • Knowledge of ATM SurveillanceAssets • Knowledge of ATC Procedures & Services • Knowledge of NextGen, SESAR, OneSky • Operators • RPA End Users: Pilot & Payload • Small & Large • CPA Pilots • NewTechnologies: Airware, LATAS, UTM
  • 168. Key Questions • Where do we have the skills to: • Make decisions on what is relevant (C2, DAA, ATM) • Address particular gaps • Operational Procedure Generation • ATM Integration • Technology Specification Development • Technical Solution Development Required Expertise: DAA • Sensors (Cooperative & Non-Cooperative) • Sensor Integration, Blending, target tracking • System Architectures • Separation & Avoidance Logic,ACAS Logic • Operations • Information Processing • Aircraft Performance & Manoevreability • ATC Required Expertise: CNPC • DigitalComms • Terrain, Urban, Obstacle Database Mgt • Comms, Nav, Surveillance (CNS) • EM Spectrum Environment & Measurement • Spectrum Management • SATCOM Infrastructure • Small UAVs • RCP, QoS, Safety & Security • GNSS • Modelling & Simulation • Advanced Control Required Expertise: ATM & Operations • ATC & ATM Specialists • Flight Planning • Knowledge of ATM SurveillanceAssets • Knowledge of ATC Procedures & Services • Knowledge of NextGen, SESAR, OneSky • Operators • RPA End Users: Pilot & Payload • Small & Large • CPA Pilots • NewTechnologies: Airware, LATAS, UTM
  • 169. Key Questions • Where do we have the skills to: • Make decisions on what is relevant (C2, DAA, ATM) • Address particular gaps • Operational Procedure Generation • ATM Integration • Technology Specification Development • Technical Solution Development • Assess Risk & Develop Mitigation when Solutions not present Required Expertise: DAA • Sensors (Cooperative & Non-Cooperative) • Sensor Integration, Blending, target tracking • System Architectures • Separation & Avoidance Logic,ACAS Logic • Operations • Information Processing • Aircraft Performance & Manoevreability • ATC Required Expertise: CNPC • DigitalComms • Terrain, Urban, Obstacle Database Mgt • Comms, Nav, Surveillance (CNS) • EM Spectrum Environment & Measurement • Spectrum Management • SATCOM Infrastructure • Small UAVs • RCP, QoS, Safety & Security • GNSS • Modelling & Simulation • Advanced Control Required Expertise: ATM & Operations • ATC & ATM Specialists • Flight Planning • Knowledge of ATM SurveillanceAssets • Knowledge of ATC Procedures & Services • Knowledge of NextGen, SESAR, OneSky • Operators • RPA End Users: Pilot & Payload • Small & Large • CPA Pilots • NewTechnologies: Airware, LATAS, UTM
  • 170. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Skills to Deal with Scope of Work If we bypass what the US/Europeans are doing, • was the decision underpinned by knowledge and expertise or ignorance, business agendas or simply plucked? • What are the safety implications? • Are there disengaged people in the room that know better? • Are there engaged people who don’t? Safety New Tech & Security DAA & CNPC Current ATM Procs Risk to People Separation Standards Different Flight Profiles Safety DAA & CNPC Current ATM Procs Separation Standards
  • 171. Key Questions • Can we improve pace of change? • Yes. • If we convince industry to re-engage • Seek the Goldilocks Effect Required Expertise: DAA • Sensors (Cooperative & Non-Cooperative) • Sensor Integration, Blending, target tracking • System Architectures • Separation & Avoidance Logic,ACAS Logic • Operations • Information Processing • Aircraft Performance & Manoevreability • ATC Required Expertise: CNPC • DigitalComms • Terrain, Urban, Obstacle Database Mgt • Comms, Nav, Surveillance (CNS) • EM Spectrum Environment & Measurement • Spectrum Management • SATCOM Infrastructure • Small UAVs • RCP, QoS, Safety & Security • GNSS • Modelling & Simulation • Advanced Control Required Expertise: ATM & Operations • ATC & ATM Specialists • Flight Planning • Knowledge of ATM SurveillanceAssets • Knowledge of ATC Procedures & Services • Knowledge of NextGen, SESAR, OneSky • Operators • RPA End Users: Pilot & Payload • Small & Large • CPA Pilots • NewTechnologies: Airware, LATAS, UTM Manpower & Skill CASA & Industry
  • 173. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid RTCA White Papers & MOPS
  • 174. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid RTCA White Papers & MOPS Focused on UA which require approval to fly in airspace normally frequented by commercial transport aircraft Facilitates transition to/from Class A or special use airspace, traversing Class D, E, & G airspace Not applicable to sUAS: • Must be > 55lb • Capable of DAA forCooperative & Uncooperative. radar, ADSB,TCAS… Phase 1 MOPS
  • 175. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid RTCA White Papers & MOPS Focused on UA which require approval to fly in airspace normally frequented by commercial transport aircraft Facilitates transition to/from Class A or special use airspace, traversing Class D, E, & G airspace Not applicable to sUAS: • Must be > 55lb • Capable of DAA forCooperative & Uncooperative. radar, ADSB,TCAS… Phase 1 MOPS 0 500 1000 2011 2012 2013 2014 DJI
  • 176. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid RTCA White Papers & MOPS Focused on UA which require approval to fly in airspace normally frequented by commercial transport aircraft Facilitates transition to/from Class A or special use airspace, traversing Class D, E, & G airspace Not applicable to sUAS: • Must be > 55lb • Capable of DAA forCooperative & Uncooperative. radar, ADSB,TCAS… Phase 1 MOPS 0 500 1000 2011 2012 2013 2014 DJI Still Prudent to pay attention to Contents, • Unknown Unknowns are not good when approving BVLOS or • Accepting lower quality equipment
  • 177. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Encounter Set: Understanding the Risk DetectEncounters Own-ship Data Tracker Alerting Guidance Display Pilot Aircraft Model
  • 178. DAATimelineAllocation Summary DAA MOPS Appendix J,Table J-2 Step Time (sec) Detect (Sensor) 5 Track (Sensor) 5 Evaluate (DAAP) 1 TransmitTracks (CNPC) 2 Display 1 Declare (DGP) 1 Determine (Pilot) 10 ( NASA HITL) Pilot-ATC Interaction 10 ( NASA HITL) Pilot Input (Pilot) 5 (NASA HITL) RLP B (CNPC) 2 ) Maneuver (UA) 30 (Depends on speed) Well Clear Boundary 35 Total 107
  • 179. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid SC-228 MOPS Development Radar Declaration Range
  • 180. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid SC-228 MOPS Development Alert Pilot Detect Intruder Determine Resolution 15 s Radar Declaration Range
  • 181. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid SC-228 MOPS Development Alert Pilot Detect Intruder Determine Resolution 15 s Negotiate ATC Clearance 10 s Radar Declaration Range
  • 182. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid SC-228 MOPS Development Alert Pilot Detect Intruder Determine Resolution 15 s Negotiate ATC Clearance 10 s 30.0 s maneuver to remain well clear (Aircraft Performance Radar Declaration Range
  • 183. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid SC-228 MOPS Development Alert Pilot Detect Intruder Determine Resolution 15 s Negotiate ATC Clearance 10 s 30.0 s maneuver to remain well clear (Aircraft Performance 35.0 s DAAWell Clear Radar Declaration Range
  • 184. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid SC-228 MOPS Development Alert Pilot Detect Intruder Determine Resolution 15 s Negotiate ATC Clearance 10 s 30.0 s maneuver to remain well clear (Aircraft Performance 35.0 s DAAWell Clear Radar Declaration Range 110 seconds RDR Can vary up to 110 seconds as function of intruder speed, ownship speed and intruder bearing angle
  • 185. Prepared by :Terrence Martin DAA Performance Assessment Key ASTM F2411 SAA Requirement for Class 3 220 Degrees 30 Degrees
  • 186. Prepared by :Terrence Martin DAA Performance Assessment Key ASTM F2411 SAA Requirement for Class 3 220 Degrees 30 Degrees Day, Night, Bright Light, & any weather
  • 187. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Angular Resolution & Stabilisation Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
  • 188. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Angular Resolution & Stabilisation Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
  • 189. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Angular Resolution & Stabilisation Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
  • 190. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Angular Resolution & Stabilisation Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
  • 191. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Angular Resolution & Stabilisation Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
  • 192. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Angular Resolution & Stabilisation Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
  • 193. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Angular Resolution & Stabilisation Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
  • 194. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Angular Resolution & Stabilisation Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
  • 195. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Angular Resolution & Stabilisation Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
  • 196. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Angular Resolution & Stabilisation Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
  • 197. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Angular Resolution & Stabilisation Radar shall correct for pitch up of 5 degree
  • 198. Detection Range Populated Area A300 Passenger Aircraft Surveillance RPA: Luna Time Taken Less than 1 second Luna Imagery Before Crash Landing near Kabul NMAC
  • 199. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Practicalities of DAA Minimum Maneuvering Time Example 60 kts
  • 200. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Practicalities of DAA Minimum Maneuvering Time Example 60 kts A380 240 kts 24 m 12 m
  • 201. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Practicalities of DAA Minimum Maneuvering Time Example 60 kts 300 kts closing speed A380 240 kts 24 m 12 m
  • 202. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Practicalities of DAA Minimum Maneuvering Time Example DJI Phantom 3 Max Descent: 590.551 feet per minute Max Speed 16 m/s (no wind) = 31 kts 60 kts Scan Eagle: • Max ROC: 150m/min (491 feet per minute) • Lets assume can descend at same rate ( not a given) • Cruise Speed 300 kts closing speed A380 240 kts 24 m 12 m
  • 203. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Practicalities of DAA Minimum Maneuvering Time Example DJI Phantom 3 Max Descent: 590.551 feet per minute Max Speed 16 m/s (no wind) = 31 kts 60 kts Scan Eagle: • Max ROC: 150m/min (491 feet per minute) • Lets assume can descend at same rate ( not a given) • Cruise Speed 300 kts closing speed A380 240 kts 24 m 12 m • Time to climb/descend 12 m is 4.8 seconds ( 12 150 ) mins • 300 kts closing speed = 5 nm per minute • Decision to MOVE must be made at ( 4.8 60 ) x 5kts : 740 m range • Assumes an instantaneous reaction..
  • 204. A380 79.8 m 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0200040006000800010000 NoofPixelsRepresentingAircraft Range between A380 and State Aircraft 25 m For 300 kt Closing Speed 5mm focal length 3.75 um pixel width HFOV =44 degrees
  • 205. A380 79.8 m 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0200040006000800010000 NoofPixelsRepresentingAircraft Range between A380 and State Aircraft At 3000 m : • 20 seconds to Collision, • Intruder is 11 pixels • Approx 1% of HFOV (1024 pixels) At 2000 m: • 13 seconds to Collision, • Intruder is 16 Pixels • Approx 1.5% of HFOV 25 m For 300 kt Closing Speed 5mm focal length 3.75 um pixel width HFOV =44 degrees
  • 206. A380 79.8 m 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0200040006000800010000 NoofPixelsRepresentingAircraft Range between A380 and State Aircraft At 3000 m : • 20 seconds to Collision, • Intruder is 11 pixels • Approx 1% of HFOV (1024 pixels) At 2000 m: • 13 seconds to Collision, • Intruder is 16 Pixels • Approx 1.5% of HFOV 25 m At 1000 m • 6.5 seconds to Collision, • Intruder is 33 Pixels • 3 % of HFOV (44 degrees) For 300 kt Closing Speed 5mm focal length 3.75 um pixel width HFOV =44 degrees
  • 207. At 1000 m • 6.5 seconds to Collision, • Intruder is 33 Pixels • 3 % of HFOV At 3000 m • 20 seconds to Collision, • Intruder is 11 pixels • 1% of HFOV For 300 kt Closing Speed 5mm focal length 3.75 um pixel width
  • 208.
  • 210. 220 Degrees At 1000 m • 6.5 seconds to Collision, • Intruder is 33 Pixels • 3 % of 44degree HFOV 44 Degrees HFOV
  • 211. 220 Degrees At 1000 m • 6.5 seconds to Collision, • Intruder is 33 Pixels • 3 % of 44degree HFOV 44 Degrees HFOV Actually 0.6% of 220 degrees FoR required by specification
  • 212. 220 Degrees At 1000 m • 6.5 seconds to Collision, • Intruder is 33 Pixels • 3 % of 44degree HFOV 44 Degrees HFOV Actually 0.6% of 220 degrees FoR required by specification Thankfully,A380’s don’t operate at low level without ATC separation….. but willATC know about the UAV?
  • 213. Prepared by :Terrence Martin ATM Operations Aircraft Performance: Different climb & descent rates, turn radius, cruise speed Issues for DAA & ATM Missions: RPAS loitering & Surveillance: CPA Point A to B 100 kts 300 ft/min Radius ~ 1 NM 450 kts 1500 ft/min Radius ~ 8 NM Loiter Pattern Point to Point
  • 214. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Encounters 80 Baseline Stressing Cases @ 6,000’ or 18,000’ Alt 24-Head-On • 250kt or 500kt • 0, 1500, 3000 fpm • 0, 2500’, 12000’ HMD • 0, 500’, 1000’ VMD 12-Overtake • 150kt vs. 100 or 140kt • 0, -1500 fpm • 0, 250’ HMD • 0, 500’ VMD 32-Converging • 250kt or 500kt • 0 or -3000 fpm • 0, 2500’, 12000’ HMD • 0, 500’, 1000’ VMD • 60 , 90 , 120 IA 12-Maneuvering Intr • 250kt or 500kt • 0 or +1500 fpm • 0, 2500’, 12000’ HMD • 0, 500’ VMD 15 Additional Cases 5-USAF • Crossing Geometry • Alt-Crossing Before CPA 5-MIT/LL • Mixed Geometry 5-NASA • Parallel Course • Vertically Converging + 1. Lincoln Labs Data • Correlated • Uncorrelated 2. Scripted Stress Cases
  • 215. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Encounters: Head On Encounters 24 Head On • 250kt or 500kt • 0, 1500, 3000 fpm • 0, 2500’, 12000’ HMD • 0, 500’, 1000’VMD 1. Lincoln Labs Data • Correlated • Uncorrelated 2. Scripted Stress Cases *.KMZ Images generated using Code from Institute for Aerospace Research, National Research Centre, Canadian with support from Kris Ellis
  • 216. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Converging Encounters 32 Converging Encounters • 250kt or 500kt • 0 or -3000 fpm • 0, 2500’, 12000’ HMD • 0, 500’, 1000’VMD • 60 , 90 , 120 IA 1. Lincoln Labs Data • Correlated • Uncorrelated 2. Scripted Stress Cases *.KMZ Images generated using Code from Institute for Aerospace Research, National Research Centre, Canadian with support from Kris Ellis
  • 217. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Manoevering Encounters 12 Maneuvering Stress Cases • 250kt or 500kt • 0 or +1500 fpm • 0, 2500’, 12000’ HMD • 0, 500’VMD 1. Lincoln Labs Data • Correlated • Uncorrelated 2. Scripted Stress Cases *.KMZ Images generated using Code from Institute for Aerospace Research, National Research Centre, Canadian with support from Kris Ellis
  • 218. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Overtaking Encounters 12 Overtaking Encounters 1. Lincoln Labs Data • Correlated • Uncorrelated 2. Scripted Stress Cases • 150kt vs. 100 or 140kt • 0, -1500 fpm • 0, 250’ HMD • 0, 500’VMD *.KMZ Images generated using Code from Institute for Aerospace Research, National Research Centre, Canadian with support from Kris Ellis
  • 219. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Overtaking Encounters 12 Overtaking Encounters1. Lincoln Labs Data • Correlated • Uncorrelated 2. Scripted Stress Cases • 150kt vs. 100 or 140kt • 0, -1500 fpm • 0, 250’ HMD • 0, 500’VMD *.KMZ Images generated using Code from Institute for Aerospace Research, National Research Centre, Canadian with support from Kris Ellis
  • 220. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Detect & Avoid Overtaking Encounters 12 Overtaking Encounters1. Lincoln Labs Data • Correlated • Uncorrelated 2. Scripted Stress Cases • 150kt vs. 100 or 140kt • 0, -1500 fpm • 0, 250’ HMD • 0, 500’VMD This is for Large UAVs conducting BVLOS Which parts are not relevant for sUAS! How will these decision be made? And what about C2 LinkVulnerabilities! *.KMZ Images generated using Code from Institute for Aerospace Research, National Research Centre, Canadian with support from Kris Ellis
  • 222. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Command Non Payload Control RTCA SC-228 White Paper C2 Data Link Source: RTCAWP-2: Command & Control Data Link ( 18 Mar 2014) UAS Data Link
  • 223. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Command Non Payload Control RTCA SC-228 White Paper C2 Data Link Source: RTCAWP-2: Command & Control Data Link ( 18 Mar 2014) UAS Data Link UAS Payload Link Out of Scope Payload Link: carries all logical flows associated with mission payload package. No Safety of flight information, so not required to be in aviation safety protected spectrum.
  • 224. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Command Non Payload Control RTCA SC-228 White Paper C2 Data Link Source: RTCAWP-2: Command & Control Data Link ( 18 Mar 2014) UAS Data Link UAS Control & NON Payload Comms (CNPC) Link UAS Payload Link Command & Non-Payload Comms; Carries all logical flows associated with controlling the flight of the aircraft as well as aircraft system status monitoing and link mgt. Expected to be relatively low bandwidth
  • 225. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Command Non Payload Control RTCA SC-228 White Paper C2 Data Link Source: RTCAWP-2: Command & Control Data Link ( 18 Mar 2014) UAS Data Link UAS Control & NON Payload Comms (CNPC) Link PilotATC Link UAS Payload Link Voice Data eg CPDLC
  • 226. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Command Non Payload Control RTCA SC-228 White Paper C2 Data Link Source: RTCAWP-2: Command & Control Data Link ( 18 Mar 2014) UAS Data Link UAS Control & NON Payload Comms (CNPC) Link UAS Control LinkPilotATC Link Telecommand Link UAS Payload Link UPLINK from pilot to AC to Aircraft • Information needed to control flight trajectory • Information needed to control all aircraft systems required for safe flight
  • 227. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Command Non Payload Control RTCA SC-228 White Paper C2 Data Link Source: RTCAWP-2: Command & Control Data Link ( 18 Mar 2014) UAS Data Link UAS Control & NON Payload Comms (CNPC) Link UAS Control LinkPilotATC Link Telemetry Link UAS Payload Link Telemetry link DOWNLINK from AC to Pilot Aircraft location, attitude & speed System status Onboard NAVAID data Track data FPV is on board
  • 228. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Command Non Payload Control • C2 Link provides reliable communication between PIC and RPA and ATC • May or may not occur via RPA Expectations
  • 229. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Command Non Payload Control • C2 Link provides reliable communication between PIC and RPA and ATC • May or may not occur via RPA • Reliability of link must be appropriate for the environment • Airports and DenseTraffic • Departure & Arrival • Enroute: • Class A airspace Oceanic • What is the Quality of Service of the link • RF propagation, Signal Fading,Antenna Placement, frequency diversity • Protection from interference:Which Spectrum,CAPACITY expectations, Security Expectations
  • 230. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Command Non Payload Control • C2 Link provides reliable communication between PIC and RPA and ATC • May or may not occur via RPA • Reliability of link must be appropriate for the environment • Airports and DenseTraffic • Departure & Arrival • Enroute: • Class A airspace Oceanic • What is the Quality of Service of the link • RF propagation, Signal Fading, Antenna Placement, frequency diversity • Protection from interference: Which Spectrum, CAPACITY expectations, Security • BVLOS vehicles must have an ability to maintain predictable flight on a planned heading & altitude if they lose CNPC. • What airspace could they enter if they lose link • Contingency Management: Software Assurance Expectations
  • 231. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Availability and Continuity Indigenous Capacity: Knowing your limitations
  • 232. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CNPC Critical Failure Modes Overall Availability & Continuity
  • 233. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CNPC Critical Failure Modes Overall Availability & Continuity OR C2 Link Interruption-No Component Fail RPAS C2 Link Component Fail
  • 234. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CNPC Critical Failure Modes Overall Availability & Continuity OR C2 Link Interruption-No Component Fail RPAS C2 Link Component Fail Propagation Event Interference Event Airframe Obstruction Capacity OR
  • 235. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CNPC Critical Failure Modes Overall Availability & Continuity OR C2 Link Interruption-No Component Fail Propagation Event Interference Event Airframe Obstruction Capacity OR
  • 236. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CNPC Critical Failure Modes Overall Availability & Continuity OR C2 Link Interruption-No Component Fail Propagation Event Interference Event Airframe Obstruction Capacity OR David W. Matolak , Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Air-Ground Channel Characterization Results , University of South Carolina
  • 237. Prepared by :Terrence Martin CNPC Critical Failure Modes Overall Availability & Continuity OR C2 Link Interruption-No Component Fail Propagation Event Interference Event Airframe Obstruction Capacity OR How long is Acceptable to lose link? David W. Matolak , Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Air-Ground Channel Characterization Results , University of South Carolina
  • 238. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Source Page 4-4 ICAO 9869 Dealing with Uncertainty Separation: RCP Transaction times Aircraft Separation is a function of many things, including timeframe required for ATC to communicate with Aircraft to effect a manouevers RPAs can have different comms pathways, thus longer comms timeframes eg satellite, HF etc How much separation is required for these instances??
  • 239. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Source:Page 4-4 ICAO 9869 Dealing with Uncertainty C2 Link Required Communication Performance RP Send Message ATC receives Indication of Message Imbound ATC Understand Message ATC Compose Feedback ATC Sends Message RP Gets Indication of Imbound Message RP Compose Message RP Completes Action RP Transmits Completion Typical RPAS C2TransactionTime TotalTime is combination of: • Human to Machine & Machine Machine Interface • Human ReactionTimes • Tech Communication Media: Satellite, Microwave,….relayed or LOS
  • 240. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Source:Page 4-4 ICAO 9869 Dealing with Uncertainty C2 Link Required Communication Performance RP Send Message ATC receives Indication of Message Imbound ATC Understand Message ATC Compose Feedback ATC Sends Message RP Gets Indication of Imbound Message RP Compose Message RP Completes Action RP Transmits Completion Typical RPAS C2TransactionTime TotalTime is combination of: • Human to Machine & Machine Machine Interface • Human ReactionTimes • Tech Communication Media: Satellite, Microwave,….relayed or LOS LongerTime: Greater Separation • Eg CPDLC whilst travelling internationally means much greater separation distances in Oceanic
  • 241. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Dealing with Uncertainty CASA AC 101-1 Sect 5.10.3 states: The parameters, which determine acceptable intermittent loss of signal and total loss, will be set by the manufacturer.. Should the determination of an acceptable duration for Lost Link beforeATC is advised, at least involve the REGULATOR & ANSP Indigenous Capacity : CNPC & RCP in Oz
  • 242. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Dealing with Uncertainty Indigenous Capacity: Lost Link Decision Times Taxi, Takeoff and Landing. Within 5nm of runway and below 10kft. • Lost C2 Link Decision time = 2 seconds. • Short time required because risk may increase rapidly and the pilot may not have time to intervene for a RPA with a low automation level. • A Lost C2 Link must be declared quickly; More automatic operation required by RPA if these times cant be achieved 2 NM 3 NM 400ft AGL 100ft AGL 0 NM 500ft 600ft AGL RPAS How Long would it take for RPAS to Communicate Lost Link to ATC???
  • 243. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Dealing with Uncertainty Indigenous Capacity: Lost Link Decision Times Departure and Arrival. RPA within 30nm of runway and below 18kft. • RLOS at this longer range • Lost C2 Link Decision time = 10seconds. • Equivalent to the ATC RCP for terminal areas. Enroute. RPA greater than 30nm from runway and below 60kft. • Use BRLOS (terrestrial network) • 10 seconds Lost C2 Link Decision time (non-satellite) • 30 seconds when satellite C2 Link, e.g. when significantly further way than 30nm.
  • 245. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Future Directions 1. Goals, Milestones, National Priorities and what is Achievable • Capturing & Communicating gaps preventing achievement • Reality: National Aspirations tempered by Indigenous Capacity & Money • 80:20 Rule • Transparency: fostering industry Buy-In for solutions Creating, Communicating and Enacting a Feasible Roadmap
  • 246. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Future Directions 1. Goals, Milestones, National Priorities and what is Achievable • Capturing & Communicating gaps preventing achievement • Reality: National Aspirations tempered by Indigenous Capacity & Money • 80:20 Rule • Transparency: fostering industry Buy-In for solutions 2. Workforce: • What is available, what is required, and how can we improve it • Fostering Industry Buy-In • Working Group Restructure: Motivation, Skills Creating, Communicating and Enacting a Feasible Roadmap
  • 247. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Future Directions 1. Goals, Milestones, National Priorities and what is Achievable • Capturing & Communicating gaps preventing achievement • Reality: National Aspirations tempered by Indigenous Capacity & Money • 80:20 Rule • Transparency: fostering industry Buy-In for solutions 2. Workforce: • What is available, what is required, and how can we improve it • Fostering Industry Buy-In • Working Group Restructure: Motivation, Skills 3. CoordinatedTrials Creating, Communicating and Enacting a Feasible Roadmap
  • 248. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Future Directions Australian Goals & timeliness will be a compromise: • Our Economic Priorities • Our Indigenous Capacity • CASA & Industry • Money • R&D expertise • There will be some reliance on overseas regulatory development CANWE FINESSE an OPTIMAL BALANCE? Goals, National Priorities & Achievability 14 Key R&D Activities: • EVLOS/VLOS • 1.RPAS activities awareness for security • 2. Operations in Urban Areas • 3. Human Factors • IFR/VFR • 4. Visual Detectability solutions • 5. DAA • 6. Comms C2 Datalink • 7. Airspace & Airport Access • 8 Contingency • BVLOS • 9. DAA • 10. Comms C2 Datalink • 11 Airspace & Airport Access • 12. Security • 13 Human Factors: BVLOS & IFR/VFR • 14 Best Practice Demonstration Goals Milestones Gaps & Barriers Action Items Priorities &Timelines
  • 249. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Future Directions Goals, National Priorities & Achievability 14 Key R&D Activities: • EVLOS/VLOS • 1.RPAS activities awareness for security • 2. Operations in Urban Areas • 3. Human Factors • IFR/VFR • 4. Visual Detectability solutions • 5. DAA • 6. Comms C2 Datalink • 7. Airspace & Airport Access • 8 Contingency • BVLOS • 9. DAA • 10. Comms C2 Datalink • 11 Airspace & Airport Access • 12. Security • 13 Human Factors: BVLOS & IFR/VFR • 14 Best Practice Demonstration Goals Milestones Gaps & Barriers Action Items Priorities &Timelines Still important that we:
  • 250. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Future Directions Goals, National Priorities & Achievability 14 Key R&D Activities: • EVLOS/VLOS • 1.RPAS activities awareness for security • 2. Operations in Urban Areas • 3. Human Factors • IFR/VFR • 4. Visual Detectability solutions • 5. DAA • 6. Comms C2 Datalink • 7. Airspace & Airport Access • 8 Contingency • BVLOS • 9. DAA • 10. Comms C2 Datalink • 11 Airspace & Airport Access • 12. Security • 13 Human Factors: BVLOS & IFR/VFR • 14 Best Practice Demonstration Goals Milestones Gaps & Barriers Action Items Priorities &Timelines Still important that we: •Identify gaps &/or available mitigations and prioritise their treatment • Relevant to Australian Priorities
  • 251. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Future Directions Goals, National Priorities & Achievability 14 Key R&D Activities: • EVLOS/VLOS • 1.RPAS activities awareness for security • 2. Operations in Urban Areas • 3. Human Factors • IFR/VFR • 4. Visual Detectability solutions • 5. DAA • 6. Comms C2 Datalink • 7. Airspace & Airport Access • 8 Contingency • BVLOS • 9. DAA • 10. Comms C2 Datalink • 11 Airspace & Airport Access • 12. Security • 13 Human Factors: BVLOS & IFR/VFR • 14 Best Practice Demonstration Goals Milestones Gaps & Barriers Action Items Priorities &Timelines Still important that we: •Identify gaps &/or available mitigations and prioritise their treatment • Relevant to Australian Priorities •Do it quickly, without compromising safety • Take what is useful: dispense with what is not
  • 252. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Future Directions Goals, National Priorities & Achievability 14 Key R&D Activities: • EVLOS/VLOS • 1.RPAS activities awareness for security • 2. Operations in Urban Areas • 3. Human Factors • IFR/VFR • 4. Visual Detectability solutions • 5. DAA • 6. Comms C2 Datalink • 7. Airspace & Airport Access • 8 Contingency • BVLOS • 9. DAA • 10. Comms C2 Datalink • 11 Airspace & Airport Access • 12. Security • 13 Human Factors: BVLOS & IFR/VFR • 14 Best Practice Demonstration Goals Milestones Gaps & Barriers Action Items Priorities &Timelines Still important that we: •Identify gaps &/or available mitigations and prioritise their treatment • Relevant to Australian Priorities •Do it quickly, without compromising safety • Take what is useful: dispense with what is not •Communicate to Industry what is needed • Allow them to help
  • 253.
  • 254.
  • 255.
  • 256. Priorities & Demographics Airspace Size /Weight Population G Small Barren, Rural, Urban, City?? Med Large E Small Med Large D Small Med Large
  • 257. Priorities & Demographics EVLOS BVLOS BRLOS IMC Airspace Size /Weight Population G Small Barren, Rural, Urban, City?? Med Large E Small Med Large D Small Med Large
  • 258. Priorities & Demographics BVLOS BRLOS IMC Airspace Size /Weight Population TechSpec Gaps Procedural Gaps Tech Solutions Operational Mitigations TechSpec Gaps Procedural Gaps Tech Solutions Operational Mitigations TechSpec Gaps Procedural Gaps Tech Solutions Operational Mitigations G Small Barren, Rural, Urban, City?? Med Large E Small Med Large D Small Med Large
  • 259. Priorities & Demographics BVLOS Airspace Size /Weight Population TechSpec Gaps Procedural Gaps Tech Solutions Operational Mitigations D Small Barren, Rural, Urban, City?? N N Y Y Med Y Y N Y Large Y Y N Not yet Understood
  • 260. Priorities & Demographics BVLOS Airspace Size /Weight Population TechSpec Gaps Procedural Gaps Tech Solutions Operational Mitigations D Small Barren, Rural, Urban, City?? N N Y Y Med Y Y N Y Large Y Y N Not yet Understood Identifies • Easy Pickings • Missing Enablers • Accountable Organisation • Uncertainties
  • 261. Priorities & Demographics BVLOS Airspace Size /Weight Population TechSpec Gaps Procedural Gaps Tech Solutions Operational Mitigations D Small Barren, Rural, Urban, City?? N N Y Y Med Y Y N Y Large Y Y N Not yet Understood Uncertainty • What Equipment • What Restrictions • What Procedures • WhatTraining. Identifies • Easy Pickings • Missing Enablers • Accountable Organisation • Uncertainties
  • 262. Priorities & Demographics BVLOS Airspace Size /Weight Population TechSpec Gaps Procedural Gaps Tech Solutions Operational Mitigations D Small Barren, Rural, Urban, City?? N N Y Y Med Y Y N Y Large Y Y N Not yet Understood Uncertainty • What Equipment • What Restrictions • What Procedures • WhatTraining. Identifies • Easy Pickings • Missing Enablers • Accountable Organisation • Uncertainties • Trials • Close Following
  • 263. Priorities & Demographics BVLOS Airspace Size /Weight Population TechSpec Gaps Procedural Gaps Tech Solutions Operational Mitigations D Small Barren, Rural, Urban, City?? N N Y Y Med Y Y N Y Large Y Y N Not yet Understood Uncertainty • What Equipment • What Restrictions • What Procedures • WhatTraining. Identifies • Easy Pickings • Missing Enablers • Accountable Organisation • Uncertainties • Trials • Close Following Highlights • Capacity Shortfalls • Internal to CASA/ASA • Indigenous
  • 264. Priorities & Demographics BVLOS Airspace Size /Weight Population TechSpec Gaps Procedural Gaps Tech Solutions Operational Mitigations D Small Barren, Rural, Urban, City?? N N Y Y Med Y Y N Y Large Y Y N Not yet Understood Uncertainty • What Equipment • What Restrictions • What Procedures • WhatTraining. Identifies • Easy Pickings • Missing Enablers • Accountable Organisation • Uncertainties • Trials • Close Following Highlights • Capacity Shortfalls • Internal to CASA/ASA • Indigenous • Could GetVery Busy…… • Could we reduce/bypass lower priority work
  • 265. Priorities & Demographics BVLOS Airspace Size /Weight Population TechSpec Gaps Procedural Gaps Tech Solutions Operational Mitigations
  • 266. Priorities & Demographics BVLOS Airspace Size /Weight Population TechSpec Gaps Procedural Gaps Tech Solutions Operational Mitigations OPERATION IDENTIFIED AS HIGH NATIONAL IMPORTANCE Y Y N ?????
  • 267. Priorities & Demographics BVLOS Airspace Size /Weight Population TechSpec Gaps Procedural Gaps Tech Solutions Operational Mitigations OPERATION IDENTIFIED AS HIGH NATIONAL IMPORTANCE Y Y N ????? OPERATION WITH HIGH COMMUNITY DEMAND N Y Y ?????
  • 268. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Future Direction 80:20 Rule • Training • Operations • InitialAirworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability MOPS Expectations
  • 269. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Future Direction 80:20 Rule Treating All CONOPS Equally
  • 270. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Future Direction 80:20 Rule Treating All CONOPS Equally • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability
  • 271. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Future Direction 80:20 Rule Treating All CONOPS Equally • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability
  • 272. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Future Direction 80:20 Rule Treating All CONOPS Equally • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability
  • 273. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Future Direction 80:20 Rule Treating All CONOPS Equally • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability• Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability
  • 274. Prepared by :Terrence Martin Future Direction 80:20 Rule Treating All CONOPS Equally • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability• Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability • Training • Ops • Initial Airworthiness • Continuing Airworthiness • ATM Interoperability Clearly insufficient workforce to enact for each CONOPS, BUT….