Essay About Liberty

Freedom, Liberty, And Democracy
Final Essay Since the founding of America, ideas of freedom, liberty, and democracy have been
the priorities of Americans. Many people have sought religious freedom in the colonies which led
to the founding of other colonies which turned into states. The new world was supposed to be a
land of freedom, but many African Americans faced hard lives here. The revolutionary war helped
bring an end to slavery and it caused the many whites to challenge black slavery because of
revolutionary principles of liberty and equality. Many whites grew hostile to slavery and many
blacks submitted petitions for freedom and began to get opportunities for freedom. The war also
helped more than 50,000 African Americans gain freedom. In dealing with slavery, the white
Americans denied that their revolutionary experience should embrace black emancipation. Moses
Sash and other African Americans refused to accept white authority, and kept the dream of freedom
alive. In the North, most states ended slavery between 1777 and 1784. Although a majority of
northern whites agreed that slavery was unable to match with the revolutions commitment to natural
rights and human freedom, they refused to sanction a sudden emancipation. The laws ending
slavery in the northern states only allowed children of slaves to be freed when they reached
adulthood. The African Americans faced discrimination in jobs and housing and were denied a fair
share of funds for schools and had to rely on their own resources. They began
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Definition of Liberty
In New York there is a 250–ton green statue dressed in a robe, holding a torch and tablet with
broken chains at the feet. In 1886, the statue was given to the United States as a gift to symbolize
liberty. The statue is the Statue of Liberty. She is dressed in a robe to symbolize the Roman
goddess of freedom, Libertas. She holds a torch and a tablet to symbolize evoking the law. Many
individuals visit the Statue of Liberty, hoping to understand what liberty means. Liberty has many
interpretations and it is not confined to one meaning. To truly understand the meaning of liberty, an
individual must understand the different types of liberties that are available to Americans. Visiting
the Statue of Liberty will not fully define the concept of what liberty truly means; an individual
must understand the definition, the characteristics, the types, and what liberty is not. First, an
individual needs to understand the definition of liberty. Liberty is derived from the Latin word
"Liber," which means free. Liberty means an individual is able to to live in a society that is free of
oppressive restrictions on how to live ones life, behave, or ones political views. An individual
commonly expresses liberty as: freedom, independence, autonomy, emancipation, and liberation.
Next an individual must understand the characteristics of liberty. There are two characteristics of
liberty, negative liberties and positive liberties. Negative liberties are liberties that do not have
possess

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Essay
Civil Liberties (And how they differ from civil rights) "If the fires of freedom and civil liberties
burn low in other lands, they must be made brighter in our own. If in other lands the press and
books and literature of all kinds are censored, we must redouble our efforts here to keep them
free. If in other lands the eternal truths of the past are threatened by intolerance, we must provide
a safe place for their perpetuation." Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 1938 (Isaacs 66) Freedom of
speech, freedom of religion, the right to be free from unreasonable searches of your home, the right
to a fair trial, the right to marry, and the right to vote are all examples of Civil Liberties that every
American is guaranteed under the Bill of...show more content...
Civil liberties are basic freedoms granted to individuals in the Bill of Rights. Individual freedom
can survive only under a system of law by which both the supreme and the governed are bound.
Such a system of fundamental laws, Civil rights are constitutional guarantees, which mean they are
granted to individuals with the body of the Constitution in the form of amendments. Many civil
rights were granted after the Constitution was written, but civil liberties were included in the
Constitution since their adoption in the Bill of Rights in 1791. One of the main reasons that the
Puritans sailed to America to was to escape religious persecution. They were actually being
physically beaten because of their religious beliefs. America began with a government based on
religious beliefs. It developed into a government, which condemned those who did not believe in
the Puritan beliefs. For example, one had to believe in the Puritan religion and attend church to
vote and become a member of the Puritan society. This practice further developed into a situation
in which you were beaten or killed if you did not believe in the Puritan religion, the exact reasons
they had originally fled from England. It took a group of men to deduce what liberties were
guaranteed and which were not, to avoid mistakes made by puritans and others in history. Men like
Thomas Jefferson, who argued that the sole purpose of government was to protect our individual
rights. The

Positive Liberty
Should the Government Promote Positive Liberty? The idea of liberty, or freedom, varies between
different theorists. One theorist, Isaiah Berlin, focused on the difference between two different
ways of thinking about political liberty (Cherniss & Hardy, 2010). Berlin called these two
different concepts negative and positive liberty. According to Berlin, negative freedom can be
defined as 'freedom from', that is, freedom from constraint or interference of others. In contrast,
positive freedom can be defined in two ways: 'freedom to', that is the ability to pursue and achieve
willed goals; and also as autonomy or self–rule, as opposed to the dependence on others (Cherniss
& Hardy, 2010). Keeping the idea of positive liberty at...show more content...
And are we to presume that if the law doesn't explicitly say we can do something, we are not
allowed to do it? (Keong, 2007). Another concern expressed by Keong (2007) is the idea that
positive liberty means we expect the state to hand us certain things on a silver platter. Positive liberty
has been used as a platform to push through ideas such as the principle that everyone is entitled to a
minimum income or standard of living, though not everyone is comfortable with the "moral hazard
this might evoke" (Keong, 2007). Key questions asked with this in mind include; 'if you are
guaranteed something, will you be willing to contribute back to society for it? Or, will you sit
around and collect your entitlements? (Keong, 2007; Haworth, 1991). After going through what
positive liberty is, examples of positive liberty and the debates surrounding positive liberty, the main
question running through my head is whether the government should promote positive liberty?
While I do acknowledge what Keong says about people expecting the state to hand entitlements over,
I think that the government should promote positive liberty to maintain order within society. An
image that runs through my head at the thought of the government not promoting positive liberty is
one of anarchy. People can do whatever they like with no consequence which to me, breeds chaos all
around. At least with positive liberty, people can do what

Essay American History: Liberty and Equality
Though this nation claims to have been founded on the ideals of liberalism, a political ideology that
promotes liberty and equality, in practice many laws implemented by our Founding Fathers are
ridden with racism and elitism. In effect, the American Revolution was nothing but a shift in power
from one group of rich white men to another. Fortunately, great strides have been made to expand
franchise; between the ratification of the fifteenth amendment and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Du jur, all legal citizens over the age of 18, that do not have felonies, have the right to vote,
regardless of age, class, gender, race or sexual preference. With the increase of attention to the
national debate regarding voter identification laws, the de...show more content...
The "American Experiment" put the power of the government in the hands of a small group of men
that were elected to represent their constituencies, for the first time since the fall of the Roman
Empire. Though it was a sign of progress by the standards of the late eighteenth century, laws
established in this government limited accessibility to voting to the common man. Mechanisms were
put in place to protect from the tyranny of the majority yet, in effect; it protected the rule of the
minority that held much of wealth. Article I of the Constitution clearly dictates that state Senators
are to be appointed by the state legislator with the intention of protecting the rights of those who
built the country, property owning white males. Institutions such as the electoral college were also
originally intended to safeguard the presidency from being taken over by the least economically
advantaged, the poor. Those deemed beneath property holding men were treated as such; in a
political system claiming to be "for the people, by the people." It was not until sixty years after the
ratification of the United States' Constitution, 1850, that franchise was expanded from property
holding white men to all white men. Politically motivated systems and laws hindering American
citizens from voting have been prevalent throughout the history of the nation and voter identification
laws, however unbiased they may be worded, have

Liberty, Value, and the Liberal Perspective
ABSTRACT: This paper discusses the nature of liberty from the point of view of value. Liberty is
the highest value for liberals. The root of this liberal view is their particular conception of self.
Rawls says 'the self is prior to the ends which are affirmed by it.' This is also the Kantian view of the
self: the self is prior to its socially given roles and relationships. Therefore, no end is exempt from
possible revision by the self. There is nothing wrong with this basic idea. In fact, all theories agree
on free choice of life plan or self–determination. But they disagree about what package of rights and
resources best enables people to pursue their own conceptions of the good. However,...show more
content...
For instance, the value of the moral principle or rule "One ought not to harm others" has a value
not in itself, but in leaving the values for others not harmed or reduced. Thus it serves as a
constraint. The principle of equality or any principle of equitable distribution, say "distribution
according to contribution," is a criterion or pattern for distribution. It also dose not have a value in
itself, but serves as a criterion or pattern for the distribution of income, which is the good that has a
value.
In living a life, or being a particular person and doing all kinds of things, a human being pursues the
values of various objects, material or non–material, concrete or abstract. The pursuit of any value is
under a certain circumstance with various conditions. In order to protect the agent from unjustified
interference from the environment and at the same time to prevent the agent's doing or being
something from harming others or society, we establish not only a principle of liberty to support
the agent, but also some moral principles to constrain her or him or to serve as a criterion or
pattern, in the case where her or his doing or being affects the justice to other people.
Thus, I call the value of those social goods that support, constrain, or serve as a criterion or pattern
"associative value," which is not measurable in itself, even subjectively, but has to be measured in
terms of the value of the good pursued by the agent.
Liberty, as a

Life, Liberty, And The Pursuit Of Human Rights
Being human is something people wonder about all the time. It's quite a philosophical question, if
you think about it. When we refer to different points in history, we think of John Locke, Malcolm X,
and how humans can create something advanced. These are just some of the things that make
humans human. But the meaning of being human goes even deeper than that. For starters, John Locke
is a very important figure in history. He created the idea that humans have three natural rights. The
rights were life, liberty, and property. But eventually, property turned into the pursuit ofhappiness,
which in fact, makes a lot more sense. Property isn't something every human can have. The pursuit of
happiness, however, is something that everyone can have. Everyone has the ability to aspire to be, to
dream, to want. Especially have the ability to want to be like someone or do something with their
life. If you think about it, monkeys can want certain things, in a certain place, at a certain time. Only
humans can want in the future and think ahead about what they'll want to do with their lives, and
that's...show more content...
Malcolm spent much of his short life advocating for human rights for everyone. He was largely
famous for his speeches, books, and his overall thoughts on human rights. Malcolm's main
philosophy was that although the civil movement was trying to be non–violent, blacks should do
whatever they could against the whites if they became violent. This should be a key into what he
would think about the matter of what makes humans human. People have rights and they should be
respected. If the rights are not taken seriously or someone threatens them, then they should do
whatever they can to defend their rights. This goes back to another point, which is that we only have
the rights that we can actually defend. If you cannot defend your rights, you don't have them at

Negative and Positive Liberty Essay
Negative and positive liberty are best understood as distinct values within Berlin's own scheme of
value pluralism. While an increase in either is desirable, ceteris paribus, attempting to maximize
any single idea of liberty without regard to any other values necessarily entails absurd and clearly
undesirable conclusions; any sensible idea of jointly maximizing freedom in general, therefore, must
acknowledge the tradeoffs inherent in increasing one aspect of freedom or another. The tension here
is akin to the familiar tradeoff between equity and efficiency concerns in economics; negative and
positive freedom are not diametrically opposed, but the two ideals may not be individually
maximized at the same time. Berlin defines an...show more content...
Any meaningful acknowledgement of the merits of negative liberty requires that some minimal area
of control be left to private, individual actors. On the other hand, Berlin claims that negative freedom
is not, in any logically prior sense, "connected with democracy or self–government" (177). While
acknowledging that self–government may happen to best preserve negative liberty in practice
when compared to alternative regimes, Berlin notes that there exists no a priori reason to believe
this should necessarily be the case. In other words, even if we explicitly grant that society's goal
should be to maximize negative liberty, the optimality of democracy is not guaranteed by any
sound line of reasoning. Thus, selection of the most befitting governance structure is subject to
scrutiny as an empirical issue. By contrast, "the 'positive' sense of the word 'liberty' derives from
the [individual's] wish ... to be his own master" (178). Exponents of positive liberty focus on
internal factors rather than external actors by painting the self as essentially divided, typically into a
higher and lower self. The higher of these selves, distinguished perhaps by rationality or length of
outlook, represents in some sense the true realization of an individual's potential, nature, or entity.
This being is marked by possessing full self–consciousness, bearing full responsibility for one's
choices, and not being a slave to one's nature or "unbridled

Liberty in the History of America Essay
America is commonly called the "Land of the Free", but the abundance of liberties, and liberties for
all, has not always been the case. The Puritans were some of the first to settle in the New World, but
they were self–interested and did not come with the purpose of creating a free state for all. As time
progressed, so did their believes, and by the time Tocqueville arrived from France, liberty was an
important aspect of American life. So important that people would fight and die for it. Tocqueville,
while impressed at the amount liberty and freedoms that citizens had, believed that America had a
long way to go before it could call itself a truly free country. Fast forward over a hundred years later,
and John Rawls lived in a time were the...show more content...
Their legitimacy did not come from the people that they ruled over, but from God, and Rulers were
"appointed by God" to serve "his will". This divine sovereignty gave them to create and enforce the
laws and standards that they liked in the name of God, when often they were truly acting with
self–interest. Popular sovereignty on the other hand is considered rule by the people. Through
participation, people create and sustain the government. The Puritans did not believe in rule by
the people because people are inherently flawed and erroneous. In reality, it was the Puritans
using the claim of divine sovereignty to push their own religious and authoritarian agenda. Most
Puritan thinkers did not believe in the idea of liberty. Nathanial Ward was a strict authoritarian,
and in his essay, Simple Cobbler of Aggawam, he states that he does not believe in natural rights
and liberties. The only liberties one had were the ones given by God, so it can be assumed that he
did not believe in freedom of expression, freedom of religion or popular sovereignty (Baker and
Thomas 56). The role of the state was not to protect natural liberties, but rather, only those God given
liberties. Ward strongly condoned toleration for many reasons. First, toleration of religions other
than Puritanism would

Essay on Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death
Institution Affiliation "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death" by Patrick Henry Althia Giles 201240
Fall 2012 HIUS 221–D54 LUO Ms. Catherine Hardee November 12, 2012 "Give Me Liberty or
Give Me Death" by Patrick Henry Henry's Speech Was a Call to Action. What Did He Want His
Fellow Virginians To Do? What Were His Justifications For The Proposed Action? How Did Henry
Address The Concerns Of Those Who Did Not Agree With Him? At the Second Virginia Convention
held on 23rd March, 1775 in St. John's Church, Richmond Virginia, Patrick Henry stood and
addressed his fellow delegates regarding the defense and arming of Virginia State.[1] While some
delegated supported the reconciliation with...show more content...
Through the use of the image of slavery, Henry managed to paint a clear picture of how the
situation was, therefore, making it easier for him to emphasize the need for America's
independence. Also, Henry uses a change in the volume of his voice in his video speech to
appeal to the emotions of his fellow delegates. Henry begins his speech in a normal tone of voice,
but throughout the video, his voice gradually gets louder with time, and in the end, he shouts his
concluding line, "give me liberty, or give me death!"[4] This gradual volume change in Henry's
voice enabled him to appeal to the feelings of his audience effectively, and eventually emphasize
on his message of fighting for liberty. At the beginning of Henry's speech, he was aware of the
fact that not every delegate supported his idea of fighting British rule; some wanted America to
make peace and reconciliation with Britain. He politely acknowledged "different men often see the
same subject in different lights"[5] and that his aim was to express his sentiments unreservedly
regarding the debate on whether Americans should fight for their freedom or remain enslaved by
the British rule. Henry hoped his fellow delegates would not see his sentiments as disrespectful. He
also told his audience that they had a responsibility towards America and God to seek the truth and
that if he held back his opinions for fear of offending others; he would be

DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY SAFEGUARDS
A Best Interest Assessment
The Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 states that "an act done, or decision made, under this Act,
for or on behalf of a person who lacks capacity must be done, or made, in his best interests'. The
Deprivation of liberty safeguards are a legal framework introduced into the mental capacity act 2005
(MCA) by the mental health act 2007 (MHA). This legislation protects the rights of people in care
homes or hospitals, where the care is imputable to the state, who lack capacity or have a mental
dysfunction to make decisions regarding their care and treatment (Jones, 2008 p 383). DOLS
ensures against arbitrary deprivation of liberty (dol) which was identified in the Bournewood
Case ( HL v UK 45508/99 (2004) ECHR 471). The judgement in this case determined that in order to
adhere to the ECtHR, lawful detention needed to meet Article 5 (1) that requires a 'procedure
prescribed by law' and Article 5 (4) which requires a means to apply to a court to see if deprivation
of liberty was unlawful (dols code of practice 2008). As such, the DOLs are designed to protect the
rights of people who fall within the scope of the act.
The aim of this assignment is to evidence a critical analysis and evaluation of professional
development having attended structured learning events on the Deprivation Of Liberty Safeguards
(DOLS) and the best interest assessment process. To demonstrate the required learning outcomes, I
would like to use the case

The Statue Of Liberty Essay
There are few objects that can be compared to the significance of the figure known as the Statue of
Liberty. It is one of the greatest works of its time and still stands today as a meaningful entity of
independence to the world. The statue is a great tribute to the concept of global freedom that had its
roots in America. It was created to display the worldwide objective of peace and tranquility. The fact
that another model of this icon stands today in a world capital shows the effect that this figure has
inscribed upon the world. In addition, it represents the ideas that the United States was built upon
and those that the people have lived by to this very day. Its most paramount features in its role
through American history are its...show more content...
The statue would have died if not for the valiant efforts of Joseph Pulitzer, who through his
magazine, the World, helped raise the much needed funds for the pedestal. Though the French
had graciously granted us the statue free of charge, the Americans still had to pay for the pedestal
upon which the statue was to rest. He stated that the statue was to be a symbol of unity, freedom,
and the ideals that so many of them had fought for to acquire their very own independence.
Pulitzer?s campaign of criticism was just what the statue needed. His actions helped to raise
funds from the rich and the middle class. In a couple of years, the US had enough money to form
the pedestal. Back in France, Bartholdi had problems of his own. The structure of the statue
located in the interior was a very formidable task due to its intricate makeup. To circumvent this
problem, a man named Alexandre Eiffel, well known due to his composition of the architecture for
the Eiffel Tower in Paris, was hired as the structural engineer. He was able to make the skeletal
framework and the iron pylons for the statue and construction continued. The statue was completed
in 1884, surpassing the deadline by a reasonable number of years. The statue was dismantled and
labeled to prevent confusion when it reached New York. It was separated into almost 300 pieces
and put in over 200 crates. The French ship Isere

Liberty Bell
The Liberty Bell, located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, is an American bell of great historic
significance. The Liberty Bell is perhaps one of the most prominent symbols associated with the
American Revolution and the American Revolutionary War. It is one of the most familiar symbols
of independence, abolition of slavery, nationhood and freedom within the United States, and has
been used as an international icon of liberty. [1]
Its most famous ringing, on July 8, 1776, summoned citizens of Philadelphia for the reading of the
Declaration of Independence. Previously, it had been rung to announce the opening of the First
Continental Congress in 1774 and after the Battle of Lexington and Concord in 1775.
The Liberty Bell was known as the...show more content...
Inscribed are the names of John Pass and John Stow, together with city and date, along the inscription
"Proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereofВ—Lev. XXV, v. x. By order
of the Assembly of the Province of Pensylvania for the State House in Philad." (The spelling
"Pensylvania" was an accepted variant at the time.)
[edit] 19th–century history, repair and crack
During the 19th century, the bell tolled at the death of Alexander Hamilton (1804), Lafayette's return
to Philadelphia (1824), the deaths of Adams and Jefferson (1826), Washington's 100th birthday
celebration (1832) and the deaths of Lafayette (1834), John Marshall (1835) and William Henry
Harrison (1841). [4]
In 1839, William Lloyd Garrison's anti–slavery publication The Liberator reprinted a Boston
abolitionist pamphlet containing a poem about the Bell, entitled, "The Liberty Bell," which
represents the first known usage (in print) of the name, "Liberty Bell." [4]
It is not certain when the second crack appeared (the first after the recastings), but the bell was
repaired in February 1846. The method of repair, known as stop drilling, required drilling along the
hairline crack so that the sides of the fracture would not reverberate.
On February 22, 1846, the bell was tolled for several hours in the tower of Independence Hall in
honor of George Washington's birthday.[5] When the bell was rung,

Freedom, Liberty, and Independence
During the Jacksonian era, Andrew Jackson and Henry Clay, along with countless other Americans,
held strong in their beliefs and the pursuit of their individual rights of freedom, liberty, and
independence. The Jacksonian period was a time in American history that has been personified as a
time of extreme change and upheaval in the areas of economic growth, political interests, and
expansion. It was the tremendous shifts in these areas that threatened to surpass and exceed the very
principles of freedom, liberty, and independence that the American Revolution had been fought over,
and in which the United States of America had been founded. The purpose of this essay, based upon
the book by Harry L. Watson, Andrew Jackson vs. Henry Clay:...show more content...
Jackson also elaborated on the reasons as to why all able men, not just those that fell under his
command, should feel the overwhelming urge to stand up and fight. The motives to fight included
the acquirement of the right to trade freely and without danger on the open seas, the restoration of
the nation's honor, and most importantly, fight to prevent future indignities placed upon the hard
working citizens of America at the hands of the British. (d–1)
Andrew Jackson was a formidable opponent to the continued existence of the Bank of the United
States. The motion to extend a new charter to the Bank of the United States became a topic of
great concern for President Jackson during the election year of 1832. The bill was sent to Jackson,
to either sign his approval, or veto. The president vetoed the bill, therefore, depriving the Bank of
the United States a new charter and its continued existence after 1836. In Jackson's veto message to
the United States Senate, he declared that the Bank of the United States was a menace to the
institution of equal rights. Jackson stated in his communication with the Senate, that the risk
presented by the Bank of the United States was that it enabled vast and large sums of money to be
handled by only a few stockholders, who out of greed or possibly temptation, would be more
inclined to see to their own needs and whims than see

John Stuart Mill's Essay On Liberty
John Stuart Mill's Essay On Liberty
The main theme of on liberty was the individual. Everything else, society, education,government and
so forth had their basis in the individuals rights to his own liberty. No one, no member of society,
government, even God, if he appeared before an individual, could inforce his will upon him. That is
not to say that you couldnt change someones mind through discussions, but instead, that no one had a
right to force his views upon another. Your happiness is yours(individual) to enjoy without any
infringements. Conversations between individuals or groups of individuals is essential in
developing the notion of liberty. Mill claims that you should feel free to convey your views openly
...show more content...
Man is after all, a rational being and has the capabilities to reason things through. Education serves
more as a guide then as a factual basis for each individual. No two individuals can have the exact
same experiences in life.
Therefore, it is up to the individuals themselves to conclude what they perceive to be their own ideas
of happiness. An individual who follows traditions and customs soleley because they are inherrent in
society, is nothing more than an animal.
The very fact that you can reason said mill, means that you have the option of disregarding all
customs and traditions if you feel they are not beneficial towards your happiness.
That is not to say that you shouldnt follow customs and traditions, merely that you ought not to, for
the sake of being just another brick in the wall.
The progressive nature of humans leads to the ultimate conclusion that there is no need for a
governing force outside society consisting of individuals that have their own interests at heart. There
should not be a government, a monarch, a ruler that is outside society. Instead, it should be attached
to the people, having their best interests at heart. Rulers are not needed to protect the people from
themselves. In fact, they should be in all regards, responsible to the people and subjected to being
removed by the people, beacause it is the people who ultimately

Liberty Definition Essay
As people head down to all the shops in New York, an Italian family gazes upon the statue of
liberty. The children hold their mother's hand, and the father kneels on one knee holding his hat
in one hand saying, "Thank you." Another man stands in the middle of the road, dressed as Lady
Liberty working for pocket change. One can tell that he does not know the definition of liberty,
but liberty belongs to the people. Liberty is the one word that changes millions of lives. Liberty is
the word for freedom. Liberty has a purpose, and that purpose is to let anybody to live their own
lives. Thomas Jefferson has the saying, "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." This quote
gives a provided example of how liberty is one of the key meanings in...show more content...
In the 1800s, women were not aloud to vote. The women did not have liberty. The women are not in
control of what gender they turn out to be. This event also follows the category of race. Race is
just a word in some people's perspective. In the 1700s, black people would not get to live a life.
They could not control how they were born, and they had to work as a slave throughout their
whole life. Most of the slaves had the job to a garden gnome. They were kept as property, and this
event took away the liberty of black people. In World War II, there was a man by the name Adolf
Hitler who killed every Jewish person in sight. This time period took away the liberty of a certain
religion. Liberty should not be taken away on people's external appearance.
Liberty should be for everyone. If liberty was taken away from the people, probably only being
able to step in one spot. In the introduction, an explanation used was about "Life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness. If people did not have liberty, than Thomas Jefferson's quote would have no
meaning to people. In some other countries, people do not have liberty. This is taken away for
many countries. This example could provide communism. Communism is the act of all people
living the same lives. This takes away liberty of all people living out their own lives. Liberty should
be free to

Liberty And Liberty Essay
Liberty is defined as "the quality or state of being free."[Merriam–Webster Dictionary] The idea of
being free has been important to many people throughout the years, even to the extent that wars
would be waged over how liberty should be handled. Nevertheless, over the course of hundreds of
years, no country has been considered as synonymous with liberty as America has. Not only was
America founded by seceding itself from England, but America's national anthem refers to itself as
"the home of the free." Also, one of the most populous states in America, New York, annually attracts
tourists to its Statue of Liberty. Although America's freedom from England is how the majority of
people view the relationship between liberty and America, the...show more content...
In his letter to the Romans, Paul writes, "But now having been set free from sin, and having
become slaves of God..." [Romans 6:22] How can someone be set free from the bondage of sin
and yet bind themselves again? Does Paul not write to the Galatians, "Stand fast therefore in the
liberty by which Christ has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage"?
[Galatians 5:1] We have done nothing to deserve the grace God has given, so because we can
never fully repay God, we must become slaves to Him. Although being a slave to God sounds
limiting, this is what gives believers liberty, for Paul continues in his letter to the Romans, "...you
have your fruit to holiness, and the end, everlasting life."[Romans 6:22] The "yoke of bondage"
Paul refers to is the yoke that comes from the bondage of sin, for Paul's continues in his letter to
the Galatians, "Do not use liberty as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one
another." [Galatians 3:22] By becoming a disciple of Jesus, God has made all believers new. [2
Corinthians 5:17] Thus, by dying to sinful desires, believers receive freedom by becoming God's
slaves. Without the Pilgrims' belief concerning liberty, America would have started off much
differently. William Bradford records the pilgrims' reason for leaving their homeland England. He
writes that the church began to force all Christians "to yield to one ceremony after another, and

The Importance Of Individual Liberties
Our government comprises individual liberties on a day–to–day basis. In our Bill of Rights, we, as
the citizens on the United States, are guaranteed certain liberties, such as the freedom to speech and
et cetora. However, although these liberties are granted to the people, the reality of it is that these
liberties do not always balance between the people and the society. Likewise, without the existence
of these individual liberties, our society would not function as it would today. As of lately, many
individuals have seen the truth of how these individual liberties do not ensure the name of security
or general welfare, both internally and externally. One on–going topic in the current time surrounds
the current presidential candidate, Donald Trump. While it is within the Bill of Rights that you
have a freedom of speech, Donald Trump has used this in order to criticize others for their own
race. This is seen true when he made a speech that covered immigration and how he said that people
of Mexican decent are rapists, killers, and other negative adjectives. Even so, these are unjust slurs
that have no statistical evidence. On another level of unjust, Donald Trump wants those of Muslim
culture to...show more content...
Rice was only twelve–years old before he was shot by police officials after they thought he had an
actual gun. In our Second Amendment, it states that we have the right to bear arms. Thus, this
comes down to the question of why should people have licenses to carry a gun when this is one
of our rights? The aftermath turned out to be that Rice did not have a real gun, rather, it was a
fake gun. With that being said, Rice was unarmed but only to be shot because of a "human" error.
The police officer did not have to take this "life or death" approach, and this situation could have
been handled in a more proper manner. Fake or not, Rice still had the right to carry the gun even
though today's time calls for a

The Statue of Liberty Essay
The Statue of Liberty stands in the New York Harbor and has greeted many immigrants into Ellis
Island. At the time, Lady Liberty was letting them know that their journey to find freedom,
democracy, and a better way of life, was officially over. The Statue of Liberty is very important to
many Americans because of what it represents. (Statue of Liberty National
Monument)(Immigration) In 1865, Edvouvard de Laboulaye, of France, thought of the idea to build
the Statue of Liberty while he was on a visit to New York. He commissioned Frederick–Auguste
Bartholdi to design the statue. Barthholdi needed someone with experience with building the outer
skeletons of statues, so he asked for the assistance of Alexandre Gustave Eiffel. While designing
...show more content...
(The Statue of Liberty) Before they could even start to build the statue, France and America had
to make a compromise. France would build the statue and America would build the pedestal. In
order to make this happen both countries had to do a lot of fundraising. France did various types
of entertainment, public fees, and a lottery. America did theatrical events, art exhibits, and
auctions. Even while doing all those fundraisers', neither country was making enough money. So
Joseph Pulitzer took a stand. He used his very popular newspaper and critized the rich and middle
class in an article. He blamed the middle class for depending on the rich, and the rich for not
helping financially. His idea worked like a charm. Fundraisers' after that were going better than
ever. Once both sides had reached the amount of money needed to build, they got started building
right away!(Statue of Liberty History) When building Lady Liberty the sculptors were suppose
to keep the year 1876 in mind to have it completed, but since funds were slow early out the Statue
of Liberty was going to be a gift that was a decade late. It was completed in France July of 1884.
In order to get the statue to America they had to disassemble it into 350 individual pieces and load
those pieces on 214 crates. Unlike the statue the hand and torch were sent in one whole piece. The
statue was

One of the most important parts of the Declaration of Independence is its preamble, and, more
specifically, certain phrases contained within the preamble. Thomas Jefferson does an excellent job
of explaining why the colonies are doing the things they are doing, and is very clear in stating what
he and his associates think are the "unalienable rights" of the American people. Among these are
"Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness." Probably one of the most famous lines in American
history, I have chosen to focus on this phrase and what those three things might have meant to
Thomas Jefferson and the other Founding Fathers as they prepared this document, as well as what
they mean to us today. First, Jefferson states that every man...show more content...
Some of the abuses he describes are shutting off trade with other parts of the world, quartering
troops within the colonies, and forcing colonists to be tried in England. Jefferson and others saw
these as a violation the people's right to choose. It was his dream that men should be able to
appoint their own government and vote on all decisions that would affect them. Finally, Jefferson
states that everybody is entitled to the pursuit of happiness. It is important to note that the
colonists took care in not just saying that every man has the right to happiness, but more
specifically the pursuit of it. To Jefferson, this meant that when our government is doing its job
right, we as a people are and should be able to find our own happiness in life. Today, it means the
same thing. It is up to us to chase after whatever it is we desire and make it a reality. The only
thing holding us back from doing so should be whatever we as individuals lack, but never our
government. These three terms, Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness, embody what it means
to be an American. Thomas Jefferson wrote them as a call to his fellow people to rise up and fight
for what they believed in. The phrase continues to ring true today and inspire us as citizens to do the
very same

Essay About Liberty

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from What Are The Best Paper Writing Services

More from What Are The Best Paper Writing Services (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay About Liberty