SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 12
Descargar para leer sin conexión
For more information, contact
the Army Capabilities Integration Center
http://www.arcic.army.mil/
GLOBALLY RESPONSIVE, REGIONALLY ENGAGED
AMERICA’S ARMY:
Army Chief of Staff Strategic Vision
The All-Volunteer Army will remain the most highly trained and professional land force in the world. It is
uniquely organized with the capability and capacity to provide expeditionary, decisive landpower to the
Joint Force and ready to perform across the range of military operations to Prevent, Shape, and Win in
support of Combatant Commanders to defend the Nation and its interests at home and abroad, both today
and against emerging threats.
Who is the Army?
The United States Army is America’s sons and daughters, men and women of courage and character,
and leaders of consequence — bonded together in the Army Profession — organized, trained, and
equipped to be the most decisive land force in the world. We are a clear symbol of national resolve and
commitment. From start to finish, in the lead or in support, we are the landpower required by the Nation to
prevent, shape, and win.
The United States Army Mission
The mission of the United States Army is to fight and win the Nation’s wars through prompt and sustained
land combat, as part of the joint force. We do this by —
33 Organizing, equipping, and training Army forces for prompt and sustained combat
incident to operations on land;
33 Integrating our capabilities with those of the other Armed Services;
33 Accomplishing all missions assigned by the President, Secretary of Defense, and
combatant commanders;
33 Remaining ready while preparing for the future.
Army Chief of Staff Strategic Priorities
Adaptive Army Leaders for a Complex World
A Globally Responsive and Regionally Engaged Army
A Ready and Modern Army
Soldiers Committed to Our Army Profession
The Premier All Volunteer Army
The Army in a Time of Transition
From Adaptation to Innovation
The United States Army approaches a strategic
inflection point. After 12 years of continuous fighting,
we are transitioning from an Army at war to an Army
ready to rapidly deploy, fight, and win whenever and
wherever our national interests are threatened. As we
draw down operations in Afghanistan, we still have
Soldiers in more than 160 countries around the world.
Army formations will continue to strengthen U.S.
overseas partnerships and enhance regional security
while securing the homeland, and remaining prepared
to support civil authorities in any contingency.
The Army will transition from executing sustained
counterinsurgency operations to preparing for the
range of military operations, across all domains,
anywhere in the world. The complexity inherent
in such a broad array of potential future missions
requires the ability to adapt quickly to new threats
and circumstances. Despite the challenges, this
transitional period presents an opportunity to develop
innovative new capabilities, even as we sustain
those essential to winning decisively against any
potential adversary. Educating our Soldiers and
Civilians to grow the intellectual capacity necessary
for understanding complex security environments and
better lead Army, Joint, Interagency, and Multinational
task forces is critical to this transition.
We must adjust our education, training, doctrine,
and technological research focus so that we are
best prepared for a complex, rapidly changing, and
challenging security future. Historically, operational
adaptation in time of war has been our trademark, and
certainly has been for the past twelve years. From
the Army Special Forces Teams coordinating B-52
strikes against Taliban Forces from horseback, to
heavy combined arms battalions maneuvering in Iraqi
cities and the development of new counterinsurgency
doctrine, our ability to effectively adapt made us
successful. The future will require similar flexibility,
adaptation, and innovation. The Army has a solid
history of innovation in times of transition, when it
used intellectually-driven change to successfully
address anticipated future challenges. Since the Army
generally adapts in wartime and innovates during
periods of relative peace, setting the conditions that
make innovation possible is critical.
Innovation provides the tactical and operational
advantages which enable national strategic success.
Unified land operations built on decisive action and
mission command — linked and nested through
simultaneous execution of both combined arms
maneuver and wide area security — are what the
Nation requires of its Army. Innovation will also help
ensure that Army units are prepared for emerging and
evolving missions in space, cyberspace, and missile
defense, as well as in countering weapons of mass
destruction.
Continuity and Change
The Complex Operational Environment
Potential future enemies include technically advanced
conventional armies, irregular or paramilitary forces,
terrorists, and criminal organizations. Most areas of
operation will include the same multitude of actors
1Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Expeditionary and enduring
landpower
Combined Arms Maneuver
we see today: adversaries, indigenous populations,
coalition partners, other government agencies,
refugees, non-governmental organizations, and
the ubiquitous media. Each actor has interests
that evolve as they interact with other actors, which
means that our priorities likely will not align with all
the other players
as we pursue our
objectives. We
can expect that a
complex, chaotic
and dynamic
environment will
result.
Every armed conflict
is driven by policy
and reflects a
variable combination
of risk, violence, and
chance. Emerging
technology, along
with the diverse
geographic, social,
and political contexts in which armed conflicts occur,
makes one-size-fits-all military solutions ill suited
to our national interests. War’s enduring nature,
as well as its shifting character, will ensure that
uncertainty remains a fundamental condition of any
future operation. Global urbanization trends coupled
with ongoing efforts to avoid U.S. precision strike
weapons via subterranean
fortifications mean that we are
more likely to fight in cities and
underground. In addition to the
physical challenges presented
by such terrain, the continuous
interactions of actors with their
own objectives, interests, and
allegiances will complicate the
operational environment further.
Army formations must be able
to operate effectively across
the range of military operations
under such conditions, not
just against traditional types of
opponents.
While the possibility of general war against a
conventional military threat still exists, the most
likely future will blur the distinctions between peace
and conflict, as well as conventional and irregular
operations. Our enemies will continue to adapt and
innovate just as we will. Conflicts in this century
will involve a mix of conventional, irregular, terror,
and criminal tactics. Sophisticated weapons and
advanced technologies, once possessed by only
the most powerful nation-states, will be available to
actors not beholden to rational nation state interests.
Cyber and space
weapons, precision
munitions, ballistic
missiles, and
WMD capabilities
will proliferate
worldwide. It is
likely that our
adversaries
will combine
advanced weapon
technologies
and old systems
to create new
capabilities
suited to their
particular regional
requirements.
Future adversaries will avoid direct confrontation
with the United States wherever possible. Air- and
sea-delivered precision guided munitions provide
significant advantages for the U.S., but will remain
insufficient to defeat resilient adversaries who go
to ground and retain the will to fight. Successful
strategies address the
underlying human causes
of a conflict, preferably by
deterring war, but ultimately
by compelling acceptable
behavior by the people who
oppose us. Defeating our
adversaries requires joint
integration that maximizes the
capabilities of our Joint Force
through all domains. Robust,
expeditionary landpower
capable of operating across
the range of military operations
is essential because those
we will fight and the military
capabilities they wield are, for
the most part, land based. Only a scalable and ready
modern land force, capable of discriminate decisive
action over a sustained period of time, can counter
malicious actors and establish security to stabilize
operational environments in an enduring manner.
Build trust, develop relationships
Complex state...
...and non-state
threats
2 Globally Responsive
The Human Nature of Conflict
Strategic Landpower: Versatile, Adaptive, and Decisive
Simply put, war is a human endeavor, a clash of
wills. Landpower is the ability to gain, sustain, and
exploit control over land, resources, and people.
Land operations have a uniquely significant role,
in both peace and conflict, in addressing human
factors. Strategic Landpower is the application of
landpower towards achieving overarching national or
multinational (alliance or coalition) security objectives.
“This nation takes action in the international
arena aimed at influencing human activity
and the environments in which that activity
occurs. It could not be otherwise, as all
institutions – states, corporations, NGOs,
etc. – are populated, controlled, and directed
by people. Influencing these people – be they
heads of state, tribal elders, militaries and
their leaders, or even an entire population –
remains essential to securing U.S. interests.
All elements of national power have an
important role in these interactions with other
nations and peoples.”
“Strategic Landpower: Winning the Clash of Wills,”
USA, USMC, USSOCOM White Paper, 2013
Landpower achieves lasting strategic results. Land
forces shape the operational environment outside
of conflict, influencing the behavior of people and
governments in support of U.S. and partner nation
interests. The Army currently supports security
cooperation activities in over 160 countries world-
wide, and we can expect that demand will increase.
This forward presence provides access and builds the
human relationships essential to ensuring the type
of basing and multinational coalition support needed
during periods of conflict. Trust and confidence is best
built before a crisis starts, not at the beginning of a
conflict.
Once war begins, land forces provide decisive action
– offense, defense, and stability operations – to defeat
the enemy, protect populations and infrastructure, and
stabilize environments to restore civil authority. At the
lower end of the range of military operations, such
as disaster relief and humanitarian operations, land
forces provide support to civil authorities and help set
conditions for the return to normalcy. None of these
missions is fundamentally different than those the
Army does now or did in the past, since the human
component of operations will remain constant as long
as people are involved.
American air and sea power are unmatched in their
respective domains, which includes their support to
land forces through lethal fires, transportation, and
other capabilities. It is critical for the future of the Army
and success of the Joint Force that such superiority
continues into the future. However, the other Services’
ability to achieve lasting strategic results in any
scenario short of total war is limited. Strike operations
tend to be pre-emptive or punitive in nature and
generally have limited impact on an opponent’s will.
Air and sea power, separately or in combination, may
temporarily compel or coerce an adversary to modify
their behavior, but will not resolve the underlying
3Regionally Engaged
Service and Sacrifice
Wide Area Security
Globally Responsive
human causes of conflict in an enduring manner.
As the Nation’s principal land force, the Army will
continue to play the decisive strategic role in favorably
resolving clashes of wills.
Adaptive Army Leaders for a
Complex World
Educate and develop Soldiers, Leaders, and Civilians
The Army will continue to invest in the development
and education of our people so that we continue
to provide adaptive leaders for a complex world.
We must retain tactical competence and technical
proficiency while cultivating strategic perspective and
leadership at the senior NCO, field grade, and general
officer ranks. Fostering the individual toughness,
battlefield skills and fighting spirit that have always
typified the American Soldier will continue. An
uncertain and ambiguous future makes developing
adaptive leaders critical to our continued success.
Actively managing talent through assignments and
education to broaden leader experience and better
align individual desires with Army requirements
becomes even more important for retaining high
quality people.
We are using many tools, such as 360-degree Multi-
Source Assessment and Feedback (MSAF), to
provide the candid and honest feedback necessary
to develop leaders for future responsibilities.
We will continue to evolve our school system to
provide the right education and training to the right
individuals at the right time. We will broaden joint
and interagency school and exchange opportunities
to ensure a common knowledge of Unified Action
partner capabilities. Our current virtual training
environments are expanding training opportunities
4
COMPEL
SUPPORT
INFLUENCE
Affecting Populations, Their Governments, and Militaries
Domains
Land, Air, Maritime, Space and Cyberspace
Range of Military Operations
Military Engagement Crisis Response Major Operations
Strategic Landpower
Uniquely Positioned to Win the Clash of Wills
Special Operations - Conventional
Force Interdependence
Regionally Engaged
and offering units multiple operational settings that
compliment live training. When augmented with
emerging training approaches such as the Adaptive
Soldier Leader Training and Education (ASLTE), the
combination of live, virtual, and constructive training
allows units to refine fundamental warfighting skills
while solving complex problems in new and unfamiliar
environments.
Globally Responsive, Regionally
Engaged
Designed and Organized to Support the Joint Force
Just as a painter blends various colors to create the
exact shade needed, the proper tailoring of forces
provides the right capabilities to accomplish missions
across the range of military operations. The Army
will provide deployable and scalable regionally-
focused forces task organized for direct support of
Geographic and Functional Combatant Commands
and Joint requirements. Stability operations in Iraq
and Afghanistan demonstrated the effectiveness of
combined arms teams with the right mix of combat
power, sustainment, and support for civil authorities.
By appropriately task organizing lethal and non-
lethal capabilities, Army forces will continue to create
asymmetric challenges the enemy cannot effectively
address.
To become more globally responsive, the Army
requires formations that deploy more quickly to
austere environments while retaining the lethality,
protection, and tactical mobility of our current
units. We are focused on creating smaller Brigade
Combat Teams and other formations that require
less infrastructure, while delivering same or better
combat power by 2025. Focused scientific research,
technological advancements, and experimentation
conducted during demanding multi-echelon joint
and combined training events will allow innovative
solutions to our challenges.
As the Army prepares for future operations, the ability
to create asymmetric challenges for our adversaries
plays an essential role in shaping and setting theaters
for regional commanders. The Army will utilize its
unique characteristics and capabilities to influence
the security environment, build trusting relationships,
and gain access through rotational forces, multilateral
exercises, mil-to-mil engagements, coalition training,
and other opportunities. Regionally-aligned forces
from across the Total Army will provide geographic
combatant commands with mission-tailored, scalable,
regionally-trained, and culturally aware forces.
Those forces will be responsive to all requirements,
including operational missions, military exercises, and
theater security cooperation activities. 2nd Brigade,
First Infantry Division was the first BCT to execute
the regionally aligned concept over the past year,
in support of U.S. Africa Command. As part of the
Combatant Commander’s security cooperation plan,
groups of Soldiers ranging from small teams to entire
formations began engagement operations with 34
African nations.
Regionally aligned, mission tailored forces will play
an essential role in the rebalance of our strategic
focus to the Asia-Pacific region while still maintaining
5
Educate and Develop
Coalition Training
our commitments elsewhere in the world. In addition
to providing versatile, responsive and ready forces
to combatant commanders, this initiative will help
Soldiers maintain the expeditionary mindset essential
to a scalable and ready modern Army. The Army will
provide Combatant Commanders the capability to
rapidly deploy, fight, and win whenever and wherever
our national interests are threatened.
A Ready and Modern Army
Adapting today…Evolving tomorrow…
Innovating for the future
Preparing for the future requires the Army to develop
an intellectual framework, evolve capabilities in the
mid-term, and innovate for the distant future so that
we maintain our competitive edge for the range
of most likely and dangerous threats we will face.
We must, however, sustain the ability to effectively
respond against near-term challenges because our
opponents will never give the U.S. a “break” to pursue
continued qualitative advantages.
The first step for both evolution and innovation
is a careful review of the lessons learned in Iraq,
Afghanistan, and other regions during the past
decade. These contribute to the intellectual
framework necessary for analyzing the future
operational environment (OE), which in turn helps
us understand the character of the “next battle”
and the “battle after next.” The Army will develop
concepts for solving challenges identified in the
OE, and then analyze those concepts to identify
doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership
and education, personnel, and facilities solutions.
The Army has already begun reorganizing Brigade
Combat Teams as a result of this effort, increasing
the number of maneuver battalions in armored and
infantry brigades to provide greater capability and
versatility in future operations.
Globally Responsive6
Shape and Set Theaters
Ready and Modern
Effective future innovation requires science and
technology investments focused on game-changing
landpower technologies to counter emerging threats.
Our intent is to provide small units with capabilities
that ensure tactical overmatch while delivering a
decisive materiel edge across the range of military
operations, to include the space and cyberspace
domains as well as for counter weapon
of mass destruction missions. For
example, adversaries are developing
an array of anti-access and area denial
capabilities to defeat a United States
forced entry into an area of operation.
Both time and secure ports (or staging
bases) are assets we cannot count
on in a future contingency operation.
We will need to quickly deploy a
robust, capable, and survivable force
under austere conditions, something
current brigade combat teams (BCT)
cannot do quickly or capably enough
as currently equipped. Investment in
materials science holds the potential of
a major breakthrough that provides greater protection
at a fraction of the weight of current armor. Such
a dramatic change in the weight-protection ratio
would enable strategic maneuver of mobile protected
firepower from home
station directly to the
crisis in a matter of days
instead of weeks or
months.
Materials science is
only one of a number of
possibilities to leverage
science and technology.
Advanced computing
that enhances mission
command and human
sciences that improve
Soldier physical and
cognitive performance are two exciting areas of
scientific research that require focused investment
to reach their potential. These types of basic science
and technology research (S&T) will ensure our future
qualitative edge, and it would be a significant mistake
to risk that advantage for small economies today.
Our focus on innovation, coupled with realistic
and demanding experimentation that uses regular
Soldiers in simulated combat environments, will
allow significant improvements to our expeditionary
capabilities by 2025. We will make best use of scarce
resources by ensuring we have realistic and cost
effective solutions to the problems that hinder the
Nation’s ability to project
strategic landpower.
We will need to make
tough decisions about
resources, but the end
result will be smaller,
more agile brigade
combat teams with
the same or better
capabilities than we have
today.
Sustaining the
competitive advantages
the Army provides
to the Nation will drive many tough choices. Joint
operations depend on the Army’s ability to provide
mission command (art of command, science of
control, and the capability and capacity to conduct
both) and the logistics necessary
to support operations in austere
environments. The Army will
continue to provide joint and
combined forces with expeditionary
and enduring landpower, which
includes the unique competencies
of operational leadership, mobility,
command and control, and theater
logistics. Furthermore, the Army’s
tactical and operational mobility and
firepower will remain essential to
the successful prosecution of every
operation from theater sustainment to
close combat. Army communication,
tactical transportation, and sustainment functions are
interwoven into every aspect of joint operations and
will remain so in the future. Too deep cuts to the Army
will adversely affect our ability to effectively support
the Joint Force.
7Regionally Engaged
Focus on Science and Technology
Critical Enablers
Soldiers Committed to Our Army
Profession
Citizen, Volunteer, Soldier, Professional, Patriot
The Soldier remains the focal point for the Army:
physically and mentally strong, trained to perform
a range of tasks and missions, and committed to
our Army Profession. Soldiers are the reason the
United States Army remains a versatile, adaptive
force respected by our friends and feared by our
enemies. Soldiers will remain the foundation of our
Army’s strength, living the values of our Profession
daily and exhibiting the character, competence,
and commitment that are hallmarks of an Army
Professional.
We will ensure that the American Soldier remains the
most discriminately lethal force on the battlefield.
“We must be able to rapidly adjust our
units and capabilities to meet the unique
requirements of any situation, delivering
precision results through the most capable,
discriminate weapon system ever fielded —
the American soldier.”
General Raymond T. Odierno,
38th Chief of Staff, U.S. Army
This versatility is both a result and inherent quality of
the premier all-volunteer force’s organization, training,
and equipment.
The Premier All Volunteer Army
Army Strong
The Army has been, is today, and will remain in the
future, the strength of our Nation. Military expertise,
honorable service, esprit de corps, and professional
stewardship mark our Army’s heritage as defender of
our Nation in peace and war since 1775. The Army
will remain the most highly-trained and professional
All-Volunteer land force in the world. By enforcing
a professional environment across our Army that
promotes and respects the individual dignity of every
Soldier and Civilian, we will allow them to realize their
full potential.
As the Army
transitions
from combat
operations in
Afghanistan to
preparing for the
challenges of
2025 and beyond,
we require the
focused thinking,
investment, and
experimentation
that leads to
innovation. We
will develop the
concepts that
drive investments
in future
capabilities while
ensuring our Army
remains trained
and ready for today’s complex world. When the Nation
calls, we will provide scalable and ready organizations
with modern equipment, resourceful leaders willing to
take reasonable risks, and the indomitable American
Soldier to prevent conflict, shape the operational
environment and win decisively.
“While we cannot predict the future of our
increasingly uncertain and complex strategic
environment, we can be certain that our
Nation will continue to call on America’s
Army. “
General Raymond T. Odierno,
38th Chief of Staff, U.S. Army
8 Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged
Premier All-Volunteer
Army
Most discriminately lethal
Soldier…Sergeant…Officer…Civilian
Active…Guard…Reserve
Peace…Crisis…War
Trained and Ready…At home and Abroad
This We Will Defend
Strength of the Nation
Army Strong!
L O Y A L T Y
D U T Y
R E S P E C T
S E L F L E S S
S E R V I C E
H O N O R
I N T E G R I T Y
P E R S O N A L
C O U R A G E
What Endures
The 187 Campaign Streamers that adorn the Army flag today are proud testimony to our Army’s service
For more information, contact
the Army Capabilities Integration Center
http://www.arcic.army.mil/

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Victory Amongst People - Mills- Richards - Ewen McLay
Victory Amongst People - Mills- Richards - Ewen McLayVictory Amongst People - Mills- Richards - Ewen McLay
Victory Amongst People - Mills- Richards - Ewen McLayEwen McLay
 
Nmf iic presentation1
Nmf iic presentation1Nmf iic presentation1
Nmf iic presentation1avidas
 
Nmf iic presentation1-1
Nmf iic presentation1-1Nmf iic presentation1-1
Nmf iic presentation1-1avidas
 
A Flexible Response: Imposing Costs on Non-state Aggression.
A Flexible Response: Imposing Costs on Non-state Aggression.A Flexible Response: Imposing Costs on Non-state Aggression.
A Flexible Response: Imposing Costs on Non-state Aggression.avidas
 
M113 Gavins: COIN Success in Afghanistan v2.0
M113 Gavins: COIN Success in Afghanistan v2.0M113 Gavins: COIN Success in Afghanistan v2.0
M113 Gavins: COIN Success in Afghanistan v2.01st_TSG_Airborne
 
Kraig_Conflict and Crisis Management in East Asia
Kraig_Conflict and Crisis Management in East AsiaKraig_Conflict and Crisis Management in East Asia
Kraig_Conflict and Crisis Management in East AsiaMichael Kraig
 
Deren_CRO_PSO NATO doctrine v02
Deren_CRO_PSO NATO doctrine v02Deren_CRO_PSO NATO doctrine v02
Deren_CRO_PSO NATO doctrine v02Jerzy Deren
 
Army Futures Command Concept for Maneuver in Multi Domain Operations 2028
Army Futures Command Concept for Maneuver in Multi Domain Operations 2028Army Futures Command Concept for Maneuver in Multi Domain Operations 2028
Army Futures Command Concept for Maneuver in Multi Domain Operations 2028Neil McDonnell
 
Army in multi domain operations 2028
Army in multi domain operations 2028Army in multi domain operations 2028
Army in multi domain operations 2028Neil McDonnell
 
Terrorism and Globalization- Grifka
Terrorism and Globalization- GrifkaTerrorism and Globalization- Grifka
Terrorism and Globalization- GrifkaAmanda Grifka
 
Quadrennial Defense Review February 2010
Quadrennial Defense Review February 2010Quadrennial Defense Review February 2010
Quadrennial Defense Review February 2010Department of Defense
 

La actualidad más candente (15)

Victory Amongst People - Mills- Richards - Ewen McLay
Victory Amongst People - Mills- Richards - Ewen McLayVictory Amongst People - Mills- Richards - Ewen McLay
Victory Amongst People - Mills- Richards - Ewen McLay
 
Nmf iic presentation1
Nmf iic presentation1Nmf iic presentation1
Nmf iic presentation1
 
Nmf iic presentation1-1
Nmf iic presentation1-1Nmf iic presentation1-1
Nmf iic presentation1-1
 
A Flexible Response: Imposing Costs on Non-state Aggression.
A Flexible Response: Imposing Costs on Non-state Aggression.A Flexible Response: Imposing Costs on Non-state Aggression.
A Flexible Response: Imposing Costs on Non-state Aggression.
 
M113 Gavins: COIN Success in Afghanistan v2.0
M113 Gavins: COIN Success in Afghanistan v2.0M113 Gavins: COIN Success in Afghanistan v2.0
M113 Gavins: COIN Success in Afghanistan v2.0
 
Kraig_Conflict and Crisis Management in East Asia
Kraig_Conflict and Crisis Management in East AsiaKraig_Conflict and Crisis Management in East Asia
Kraig_Conflict and Crisis Management in East Asia
 
Deren_CRO_PSO NATO doctrine v02
Deren_CRO_PSO NATO doctrine v02Deren_CRO_PSO NATO doctrine v02
Deren_CRO_PSO NATO doctrine v02
 
Army Futures Command Concept for Maneuver in Multi Domain Operations 2028
Army Futures Command Concept for Maneuver in Multi Domain Operations 2028Army Futures Command Concept for Maneuver in Multi Domain Operations 2028
Army Futures Command Concept for Maneuver in Multi Domain Operations 2028
 
Army in multi domain operations 2028
Army in multi domain operations 2028Army in multi domain operations 2028
Army in multi domain operations 2028
 
Globalisation and terrorism
Globalisation and terrorismGlobalisation and terrorism
Globalisation and terrorism
 
Globalization of terrorism
Globalization of terrorismGlobalization of terrorism
Globalization of terrorism
 
Terrorism and Globalization- Grifka
Terrorism and Globalization- GrifkaTerrorism and Globalization- Grifka
Terrorism and Globalization- Grifka
 
Sucide Report 2
Sucide Report 2Sucide Report 2
Sucide Report 2
 
Iran Paper
Iran PaperIran Paper
Iran Paper
 
Quadrennial Defense Review February 2010
Quadrennial Defense Review February 2010Quadrennial Defense Review February 2010
Quadrennial Defense Review February 2010
 

Destacado

FY2015 President's Budget Program Acquisition Costs by Weapon System
FY2015 President's Budget Program Acquisition Costs by Weapon  SystemFY2015 President's Budget Program Acquisition Costs by Weapon  System
FY2015 President's Budget Program Acquisition Costs by Weapon SystemTom "Blad" Lindblad
 
Catalog of ATI courses on Space, Satellite, Radar, Missile, Defense & Systems...
Catalog of ATI courses on Space, Satellite, Radar, Missile, Defense & Systems...Catalog of ATI courses on Space, Satellite, Radar, Missile, Defense & Systems...
Catalog of ATI courses on Space, Satellite, Radar, Missile, Defense & Systems...Jim Jenkins
 
FY2015 DoD Budget Request Overview March 4 2014
FY2015 DoD Budget Request Overview March 4 2014FY2015 DoD Budget Request Overview March 4 2014
FY2015 DoD Budget Request Overview March 4 2014Tom "Blad" Lindblad
 
Warnke pdf transcript
Warnke pdf transcriptWarnke pdf transcript
Warnke pdf transcriptrazorjetin
 

Destacado (9)

FY2015 President's Budget Program Acquisition Costs by Weapon System
FY2015 President's Budget Program Acquisition Costs by Weapon  SystemFY2015 President's Budget Program Acquisition Costs by Weapon  System
FY2015 President's Budget Program Acquisition Costs by Weapon System
 
Vol 7
Vol 7Vol 7
Vol 7
 
Catalog of ATI courses on Space, Satellite, Radar, Missile, Defense & Systems...
Catalog of ATI courses on Space, Satellite, Radar, Missile, Defense & Systems...Catalog of ATI courses on Space, Satellite, Radar, Missile, Defense & Systems...
Catalog of ATI courses on Space, Satellite, Radar, Missile, Defense & Systems...
 
Vol3ch13
Vol3ch13Vol3ch13
Vol3ch13
 
Vol3ch14
Vol3ch14Vol3ch14
Vol3ch14
 
FY2015 DoD Budget Request Overview March 4 2014
FY2015 DoD Budget Request Overview March 4 2014FY2015 DoD Budget Request Overview March 4 2014
FY2015 DoD Budget Request Overview March 4 2014
 
Vol 8
Vol 8Vol 8
Vol 8
 
Vol3ch16
Vol3ch16Vol3ch16
Vol3ch16
 
Warnke pdf transcript
Warnke pdf transcriptWarnke pdf transcript
Warnke pdf transcript
 

Similar a Army Capability Integration Center - America's Army Globally Responsive, Regionally-Engaged- Jan 2014

CJCS_2nd_Term_Strategic_Direction
CJCS_2nd_Term_Strategic_DirectionCJCS_2nd_Term_Strategic_Direction
CJCS_2nd_Term_Strategic_DirectionTisha Wright
 
USTRANSCOM STRATEGY 2022.pdf
USTRANSCOM STRATEGY 2022.pdfUSTRANSCOM STRATEGY 2022.pdf
USTRANSCOM STRATEGY 2022.pdfAlbert Menendez
 
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Written Congressional Statement
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Written Congressional StatementChairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Written Congressional Statement
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Written Congressional StatementTisha Wright
 
After more than 15 years of war, the operational effective.docx
After more than 15 years of war, the operational effective.docxAfter more than 15 years of war, the operational effective.docx
After more than 15 years of war, the operational effective.docxdaniahendric
 
UNITED STATES ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND USASOC.docx
UNITED STATES ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND USASOC.docxUNITED STATES ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND USASOC.docx
UNITED STATES ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND USASOC.docxouldparis
 
Army Futures Command Concept for Special Operations 2028
Army Futures Command Concept for Special Operations 2028Army Futures Command Concept for Special Operations 2028
Army Futures Command Concept for Special Operations 2028Neil McDonnell
 
Beyond the Horizon: Defining Army Core Competencies for the 21st Century
Beyond the Horizon: Defining Army Core Competencies for the 21st CenturyBeyond the Horizon: Defining Army Core Competencies for the 21st Century
Beyond the Horizon: Defining Army Core Competencies for the 21st CenturyBrian Lucke
 
U.s. space command’s vision 2020
U.s. space command’s vision 2020U.s. space command’s vision 2020
U.s. space command’s vision 2020PublicLeaker
 
U.s. national space policy
U.s. national space policyU.s. national space policy
U.s. national space policyPublicLeaks
 
U.S. Central Command Posture Statement 2012
U.S. Central Command Posture Statement 2012U.S. Central Command Posture Statement 2012
U.S. Central Command Posture Statement 2012Tisha Wright
 
Force 2025 and Beyond Torchbearer Article January 2015
Force 2025 and Beyond Torchbearer Article January 2015Force 2025 and Beyond Torchbearer Article January 2015
Force 2025 and Beyond Torchbearer Article January 2015Scott Sadler
 
Commandant of Marine Corps Posture Statement_2015 to Congress
Commandant of Marine Corps Posture Statement_2015 to CongressCommandant of Marine Corps Posture Statement_2015 to Congress
Commandant of Marine Corps Posture Statement_2015 to CongressTom "Blad" Lindblad
 
The Nature Of Warfare By Martin E. Dempsey
The Nature Of Warfare By Martin E. DempseyThe Nature Of Warfare By Martin E. Dempsey
The Nature Of Warfare By Martin E. DempseyNicole King
 
Warfighting First. Operate Forward. Be Ready.
Warfighting First. Operate Forward. Be Ready.Warfighting First. Operate Forward. Be Ready.
Warfighting First. Operate Forward. Be Ready.Cpo Creed
 
CNO Sailing Directions
CNO Sailing DirectionsCNO Sailing Directions
CNO Sailing DirectionsGlenn Mallo
 

Similar a Army Capability Integration Center - America's Army Globally Responsive, Regionally-Engaged- Jan 2014 (20)

CJCS_2nd_Term_Strategic_Direction
CJCS_2nd_Term_Strategic_DirectionCJCS_2nd_Term_Strategic_Direction
CJCS_2nd_Term_Strategic_Direction
 
USTRANSCOM STRATEGY 2022.pdf
USTRANSCOM STRATEGY 2022.pdfUSTRANSCOM STRATEGY 2022.pdf
USTRANSCOM STRATEGY 2022.pdf
 
1002QDR2010
1002QDR20101002QDR2010
1002QDR2010
 
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Written Congressional Statement
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Written Congressional StatementChairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Written Congressional Statement
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Written Congressional Statement
 
After more than 15 years of war, the operational effective.docx
After more than 15 years of war, the operational effective.docxAfter more than 15 years of war, the operational effective.docx
After more than 15 years of war, the operational effective.docx
 
UNITED STATES ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND USASOC.docx
UNITED STATES ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND USASOC.docxUNITED STATES ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND USASOC.docx
UNITED STATES ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND USASOC.docx
 
Army Futures Command Concept for Special Operations 2028
Army Futures Command Concept for Special Operations 2028Army Futures Command Concept for Special Operations 2028
Army Futures Command Concept for Special Operations 2028
 
SOCOM 2020 - May 2013
SOCOM 2020 - May 2013SOCOM 2020 - May 2013
SOCOM 2020 - May 2013
 
Beyond the Horizon: Defining Army Core Competencies for the 21st Century
Beyond the Horizon: Defining Army Core Competencies for the 21st CenturyBeyond the Horizon: Defining Army Core Competencies for the 21st Century
Beyond the Horizon: Defining Army Core Competencies for the 21st Century
 
Army Operating Concept Team Teach
Army Operating Concept Team TeachArmy Operating Concept Team Teach
Army Operating Concept Team Teach
 
U.s. space command’s vision 2020
U.s. space command’s vision 2020U.s. space command’s vision 2020
U.s. space command’s vision 2020
 
U.s. national space policy
U.s. national space policyU.s. national space policy
U.s. national space policy
 
U.S. Central Command Posture Statement 2012
U.S. Central Command Posture Statement 2012U.S. Central Command Posture Statement 2012
U.S. Central Command Posture Statement 2012
 
Gov Vision for 2020
Gov Vision for 2020Gov Vision for 2020
Gov Vision for 2020
 
Force 2025 and Beyond Torchbearer Article January 2015
Force 2025 and Beyond Torchbearer Article January 2015Force 2025 and Beyond Torchbearer Article January 2015
Force 2025 and Beyond Torchbearer Article January 2015
 
Commandant of Marine Corps Posture Statement_2015 to Congress
Commandant of Marine Corps Posture Statement_2015 to CongressCommandant of Marine Corps Posture Statement_2015 to Congress
Commandant of Marine Corps Posture Statement_2015 to Congress
 
The Nature Of Warfare By Martin E. Dempsey
The Nature Of Warfare By Martin E. DempseyThe Nature Of Warfare By Martin E. Dempsey
The Nature Of Warfare By Martin E. Dempsey
 
159-200-2025
159-200-2025159-200-2025
159-200-2025
 
Warfighting First. Operate Forward. Be Ready.
Warfighting First. Operate Forward. Be Ready.Warfighting First. Operate Forward. Be Ready.
Warfighting First. Operate Forward. Be Ready.
 
CNO Sailing Directions
CNO Sailing DirectionsCNO Sailing Directions
CNO Sailing Directions
 

Más de Tom "Blad" Lindblad

2017 U.S. Marine Corps Aviation Plan
2017 U.S. Marine Corps Aviation Plan2017 U.S. Marine Corps Aviation Plan
2017 U.S. Marine Corps Aviation PlanTom "Blad" Lindblad
 
CSBA - FY-2016 Weapon Systems Factbook
CSBA - FY-2016  Weapon Systems FactbookCSBA - FY-2016  Weapon Systems Factbook
CSBA - FY-2016 Weapon Systems FactbookTom "Blad" Lindblad
 
The Tustin Hangars - Titans of History
The Tustin Hangars - Titans of HistoryThe Tustin Hangars - Titans of History
The Tustin Hangars - Titans of HistoryTom "Blad" Lindblad
 
Commanant Marine Corps' Planning 2015 Planning Guidance
Commanant Marine Corps' Planning 2015 Planning GuidanceCommanant Marine Corps' Planning 2015 Planning Guidance
Commanant Marine Corps' Planning 2015 Planning GuidanceTom "Blad" Lindblad
 
Updated Commandant USMC Planning Guidance
Updated Commandant USMC Planning GuidanceUpdated Commandant USMC Planning Guidance
Updated Commandant USMC Planning GuidanceTom "Blad" Lindblad
 
CRS - Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) and Marine Personnel Carri...
CRS - Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) and Marine Personnel Carri...CRS - Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) and Marine Personnel Carri...
CRS - Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) and Marine Personnel Carri...Tom "Blad" Lindblad
 
Sec Def Military Decorations and Awards Review
Sec Def  Military Decorations and Awards Review Sec Def  Military Decorations and Awards Review
Sec Def Military Decorations and Awards Review Tom "Blad" Lindblad
 
MCRP 5-12D Organization of United States Marine Corps 26 Aug15
MCRP 5-12D Organization of United States Marine Corps 26 Aug15MCRP 5-12D Organization of United States Marine Corps 26 Aug15
MCRP 5-12D Organization of United States Marine Corps 26 Aug15Tom "Blad" Lindblad
 
Rand Reforming Military Retirement July 2015
Rand Reforming Military Retirement July 2015Rand Reforming Military Retirement July 2015
Rand Reforming Military Retirement July 2015Tom "Blad" Lindblad
 
GAO - Surface Ships: Status of the Navy’s Phased Modernization Plan
GAO - Surface Ships: Status of the Navy’s Phased Modernization PlanGAO - Surface Ships: Status of the Navy’s Phased Modernization Plan
GAO - Surface Ships: Status of the Navy’s Phased Modernization PlanTom "Blad" Lindblad
 
DOD 2015 China Military Power Report
DOD 2015 China Military Power ReportDOD 2015 China Military Power Report
DOD 2015 China Military Power ReportTom "Blad" Lindblad
 
Doing Business with DHS (Feb 2015)
Doing Business with DHS  (Feb 2015)Doing Business with DHS  (Feb 2015)
Doing Business with DHS (Feb 2015)Tom "Blad" Lindblad
 
USMC UAS Family of Systems (April 2015)
USMC UAS Family of Systems (April 2015)USMC UAS Family of Systems (April 2015)
USMC UAS Family of Systems (April 2015)Tom "Blad" Lindblad
 
USMC Expeditionary Force 21 MAGTF Ground Combat Element (2015)
USMC Expeditionary Force 21 MAGTF Ground Combat Element (2015)USMC Expeditionary Force 21 MAGTF Ground Combat Element (2015)
USMC Expeditionary Force 21 MAGTF Ground Combat Element (2015)Tom "Blad" Lindblad
 
FY2016 Army PRESBUD Highlights (Feb 2015)
FY2016 Army PRESBUD Highlights (Feb 2015)FY2016 Army PRESBUD Highlights (Feb 2015)
FY2016 Army PRESBUD Highlights (Feb 2015)Tom "Blad" Lindblad
 
US DOD Program Acquisition Cost by Weapon System for FY16 Feb 2015
US DOD Program Acquisition Cost by Weapon System for FY16 Feb 2015US DOD Program Acquisition Cost by Weapon System for FY16 Feb 2015
US DOD Program Acquisition Cost by Weapon System for FY16 Feb 2015Tom "Blad" Lindblad
 
Report of the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission-2...
Report of the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission-2...Report of the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission-2...
Report of the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission-2...Tom "Blad" Lindblad
 
Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System
Joint Capabilities Integration and Development SystemJoint Capabilities Integration and Development System
Joint Capabilities Integration and Development SystemTom "Blad" Lindblad
 
CRS Casualty Statistics: Operations Inherent Resolve, New Dawn, Iraqi Freedo...
CRS  Casualty Statistics: Operations Inherent Resolve, New Dawn, Iraqi Freedo...CRS  Casualty Statistics: Operations Inherent Resolve, New Dawn, Iraqi Freedo...
CRS Casualty Statistics: Operations Inherent Resolve, New Dawn, Iraqi Freedo...Tom "Blad" Lindblad
 
CBO Long-Term Implications of FY2015 FYDP Nov 2014
CBO Long-Term Implications of FY2015 FYDP Nov 2014CBO Long-Term Implications of FY2015 FYDP Nov 2014
CBO Long-Term Implications of FY2015 FYDP Nov 2014Tom "Blad" Lindblad
 

Más de Tom "Blad" Lindblad (20)

2017 U.S. Marine Corps Aviation Plan
2017 U.S. Marine Corps Aviation Plan2017 U.S. Marine Corps Aviation Plan
2017 U.S. Marine Corps Aviation Plan
 
CSBA - FY-2016 Weapon Systems Factbook
CSBA - FY-2016  Weapon Systems FactbookCSBA - FY-2016  Weapon Systems Factbook
CSBA - FY-2016 Weapon Systems Factbook
 
The Tustin Hangars - Titans of History
The Tustin Hangars - Titans of HistoryThe Tustin Hangars - Titans of History
The Tustin Hangars - Titans of History
 
Commanant Marine Corps' Planning 2015 Planning Guidance
Commanant Marine Corps' Planning 2015 Planning GuidanceCommanant Marine Corps' Planning 2015 Planning Guidance
Commanant Marine Corps' Planning 2015 Planning Guidance
 
Updated Commandant USMC Planning Guidance
Updated Commandant USMC Planning GuidanceUpdated Commandant USMC Planning Guidance
Updated Commandant USMC Planning Guidance
 
CRS - Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) and Marine Personnel Carri...
CRS - Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) and Marine Personnel Carri...CRS - Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) and Marine Personnel Carri...
CRS - Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) and Marine Personnel Carri...
 
Sec Def Military Decorations and Awards Review
Sec Def  Military Decorations and Awards Review Sec Def  Military Decorations and Awards Review
Sec Def Military Decorations and Awards Review
 
MCRP 5-12D Organization of United States Marine Corps 26 Aug15
MCRP 5-12D Organization of United States Marine Corps 26 Aug15MCRP 5-12D Organization of United States Marine Corps 26 Aug15
MCRP 5-12D Organization of United States Marine Corps 26 Aug15
 
Rand Reforming Military Retirement July 2015
Rand Reforming Military Retirement July 2015Rand Reforming Military Retirement July 2015
Rand Reforming Military Retirement July 2015
 
GAO - Surface Ships: Status of the Navy’s Phased Modernization Plan
GAO - Surface Ships: Status of the Navy’s Phased Modernization PlanGAO - Surface Ships: Status of the Navy’s Phased Modernization Plan
GAO - Surface Ships: Status of the Navy’s Phased Modernization Plan
 
DOD 2015 China Military Power Report
DOD 2015 China Military Power ReportDOD 2015 China Military Power Report
DOD 2015 China Military Power Report
 
Doing Business with DHS (Feb 2015)
Doing Business with DHS  (Feb 2015)Doing Business with DHS  (Feb 2015)
Doing Business with DHS (Feb 2015)
 
USMC UAS Family of Systems (April 2015)
USMC UAS Family of Systems (April 2015)USMC UAS Family of Systems (April 2015)
USMC UAS Family of Systems (April 2015)
 
USMC Expeditionary Force 21 MAGTF Ground Combat Element (2015)
USMC Expeditionary Force 21 MAGTF Ground Combat Element (2015)USMC Expeditionary Force 21 MAGTF Ground Combat Element (2015)
USMC Expeditionary Force 21 MAGTF Ground Combat Element (2015)
 
FY2016 Army PRESBUD Highlights (Feb 2015)
FY2016 Army PRESBUD Highlights (Feb 2015)FY2016 Army PRESBUD Highlights (Feb 2015)
FY2016 Army PRESBUD Highlights (Feb 2015)
 
US DOD Program Acquisition Cost by Weapon System for FY16 Feb 2015
US DOD Program Acquisition Cost by Weapon System for FY16 Feb 2015US DOD Program Acquisition Cost by Weapon System for FY16 Feb 2015
US DOD Program Acquisition Cost by Weapon System for FY16 Feb 2015
 
Report of the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission-2...
Report of the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission-2...Report of the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission-2...
Report of the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission-2...
 
Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System
Joint Capabilities Integration and Development SystemJoint Capabilities Integration and Development System
Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System
 
CRS Casualty Statistics: Operations Inherent Resolve, New Dawn, Iraqi Freedo...
CRS  Casualty Statistics: Operations Inherent Resolve, New Dawn, Iraqi Freedo...CRS  Casualty Statistics: Operations Inherent Resolve, New Dawn, Iraqi Freedo...
CRS Casualty Statistics: Operations Inherent Resolve, New Dawn, Iraqi Freedo...
 
CBO Long-Term Implications of FY2015 FYDP Nov 2014
CBO Long-Term Implications of FY2015 FYDP Nov 2014CBO Long-Term Implications of FY2015 FYDP Nov 2014
CBO Long-Term Implications of FY2015 FYDP Nov 2014
 

Último

Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioAlexisTorres963861
 
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinEuropéennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinIpsos France
 
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...University of Canberra
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...virgfern3011
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAbdul-Hakim Shabazz
 
Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde NewsFeed1
 
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfMinistry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfSABC News
 
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduDreamTamilnadu
 

Último (9)

Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
 
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinEuropéennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
 
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
 
Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde
 
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfMinistry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
 
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
 

Army Capability Integration Center - America's Army Globally Responsive, Regionally-Engaged- Jan 2014

  • 1. For more information, contact the Army Capabilities Integration Center http://www.arcic.army.mil/ GLOBALLY RESPONSIVE, REGIONALLY ENGAGED AMERICA’S ARMY:
  • 2. Army Chief of Staff Strategic Vision The All-Volunteer Army will remain the most highly trained and professional land force in the world. It is uniquely organized with the capability and capacity to provide expeditionary, decisive landpower to the Joint Force and ready to perform across the range of military operations to Prevent, Shape, and Win in support of Combatant Commanders to defend the Nation and its interests at home and abroad, both today and against emerging threats. Who is the Army? The United States Army is America’s sons and daughters, men and women of courage and character, and leaders of consequence — bonded together in the Army Profession — organized, trained, and equipped to be the most decisive land force in the world. We are a clear symbol of national resolve and commitment. From start to finish, in the lead or in support, we are the landpower required by the Nation to prevent, shape, and win. The United States Army Mission The mission of the United States Army is to fight and win the Nation’s wars through prompt and sustained land combat, as part of the joint force. We do this by — 33 Organizing, equipping, and training Army forces for prompt and sustained combat incident to operations on land; 33 Integrating our capabilities with those of the other Armed Services; 33 Accomplishing all missions assigned by the President, Secretary of Defense, and combatant commanders; 33 Remaining ready while preparing for the future. Army Chief of Staff Strategic Priorities Adaptive Army Leaders for a Complex World A Globally Responsive and Regionally Engaged Army A Ready and Modern Army Soldiers Committed to Our Army Profession The Premier All Volunteer Army
  • 3. The Army in a Time of Transition From Adaptation to Innovation The United States Army approaches a strategic inflection point. After 12 years of continuous fighting, we are transitioning from an Army at war to an Army ready to rapidly deploy, fight, and win whenever and wherever our national interests are threatened. As we draw down operations in Afghanistan, we still have Soldiers in more than 160 countries around the world. Army formations will continue to strengthen U.S. overseas partnerships and enhance regional security while securing the homeland, and remaining prepared to support civil authorities in any contingency. The Army will transition from executing sustained counterinsurgency operations to preparing for the range of military operations, across all domains, anywhere in the world. The complexity inherent in such a broad array of potential future missions requires the ability to adapt quickly to new threats and circumstances. Despite the challenges, this transitional period presents an opportunity to develop innovative new capabilities, even as we sustain those essential to winning decisively against any potential adversary. Educating our Soldiers and Civilians to grow the intellectual capacity necessary for understanding complex security environments and better lead Army, Joint, Interagency, and Multinational task forces is critical to this transition. We must adjust our education, training, doctrine, and technological research focus so that we are best prepared for a complex, rapidly changing, and challenging security future. Historically, operational adaptation in time of war has been our trademark, and certainly has been for the past twelve years. From the Army Special Forces Teams coordinating B-52 strikes against Taliban Forces from horseback, to heavy combined arms battalions maneuvering in Iraqi cities and the development of new counterinsurgency doctrine, our ability to effectively adapt made us successful. The future will require similar flexibility, adaptation, and innovation. The Army has a solid history of innovation in times of transition, when it used intellectually-driven change to successfully address anticipated future challenges. Since the Army generally adapts in wartime and innovates during periods of relative peace, setting the conditions that make innovation possible is critical. Innovation provides the tactical and operational advantages which enable national strategic success. Unified land operations built on decisive action and mission command — linked and nested through simultaneous execution of both combined arms maneuver and wide area security — are what the Nation requires of its Army. Innovation will also help ensure that Army units are prepared for emerging and evolving missions in space, cyberspace, and missile defense, as well as in countering weapons of mass destruction. Continuity and Change The Complex Operational Environment Potential future enemies include technically advanced conventional armies, irregular or paramilitary forces, terrorists, and criminal organizations. Most areas of operation will include the same multitude of actors 1Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged Expeditionary and enduring landpower Combined Arms Maneuver
  • 4. we see today: adversaries, indigenous populations, coalition partners, other government agencies, refugees, non-governmental organizations, and the ubiquitous media. Each actor has interests that evolve as they interact with other actors, which means that our priorities likely will not align with all the other players as we pursue our objectives. We can expect that a complex, chaotic and dynamic environment will result. Every armed conflict is driven by policy and reflects a variable combination of risk, violence, and chance. Emerging technology, along with the diverse geographic, social, and political contexts in which armed conflicts occur, makes one-size-fits-all military solutions ill suited to our national interests. War’s enduring nature, as well as its shifting character, will ensure that uncertainty remains a fundamental condition of any future operation. Global urbanization trends coupled with ongoing efforts to avoid U.S. precision strike weapons via subterranean fortifications mean that we are more likely to fight in cities and underground. In addition to the physical challenges presented by such terrain, the continuous interactions of actors with their own objectives, interests, and allegiances will complicate the operational environment further. Army formations must be able to operate effectively across the range of military operations under such conditions, not just against traditional types of opponents. While the possibility of general war against a conventional military threat still exists, the most likely future will blur the distinctions between peace and conflict, as well as conventional and irregular operations. Our enemies will continue to adapt and innovate just as we will. Conflicts in this century will involve a mix of conventional, irregular, terror, and criminal tactics. Sophisticated weapons and advanced technologies, once possessed by only the most powerful nation-states, will be available to actors not beholden to rational nation state interests. Cyber and space weapons, precision munitions, ballistic missiles, and WMD capabilities will proliferate worldwide. It is likely that our adversaries will combine advanced weapon technologies and old systems to create new capabilities suited to their particular regional requirements. Future adversaries will avoid direct confrontation with the United States wherever possible. Air- and sea-delivered precision guided munitions provide significant advantages for the U.S., but will remain insufficient to defeat resilient adversaries who go to ground and retain the will to fight. Successful strategies address the underlying human causes of a conflict, preferably by deterring war, but ultimately by compelling acceptable behavior by the people who oppose us. Defeating our adversaries requires joint integration that maximizes the capabilities of our Joint Force through all domains. Robust, expeditionary landpower capable of operating across the range of military operations is essential because those we will fight and the military capabilities they wield are, for the most part, land based. Only a scalable and ready modern land force, capable of discriminate decisive action over a sustained period of time, can counter malicious actors and establish security to stabilize operational environments in an enduring manner. Build trust, develop relationships Complex state... ...and non-state threats 2 Globally Responsive
  • 5. The Human Nature of Conflict Strategic Landpower: Versatile, Adaptive, and Decisive Simply put, war is a human endeavor, a clash of wills. Landpower is the ability to gain, sustain, and exploit control over land, resources, and people. Land operations have a uniquely significant role, in both peace and conflict, in addressing human factors. Strategic Landpower is the application of landpower towards achieving overarching national or multinational (alliance or coalition) security objectives. “This nation takes action in the international arena aimed at influencing human activity and the environments in which that activity occurs. It could not be otherwise, as all institutions – states, corporations, NGOs, etc. – are populated, controlled, and directed by people. Influencing these people – be they heads of state, tribal elders, militaries and their leaders, or even an entire population – remains essential to securing U.S. interests. All elements of national power have an important role in these interactions with other nations and peoples.” “Strategic Landpower: Winning the Clash of Wills,” USA, USMC, USSOCOM White Paper, 2013 Landpower achieves lasting strategic results. Land forces shape the operational environment outside of conflict, influencing the behavior of people and governments in support of U.S. and partner nation interests. The Army currently supports security cooperation activities in over 160 countries world- wide, and we can expect that demand will increase. This forward presence provides access and builds the human relationships essential to ensuring the type of basing and multinational coalition support needed during periods of conflict. Trust and confidence is best built before a crisis starts, not at the beginning of a conflict. Once war begins, land forces provide decisive action – offense, defense, and stability operations – to defeat the enemy, protect populations and infrastructure, and stabilize environments to restore civil authority. At the lower end of the range of military operations, such as disaster relief and humanitarian operations, land forces provide support to civil authorities and help set conditions for the return to normalcy. None of these missions is fundamentally different than those the Army does now or did in the past, since the human component of operations will remain constant as long as people are involved. American air and sea power are unmatched in their respective domains, which includes their support to land forces through lethal fires, transportation, and other capabilities. It is critical for the future of the Army and success of the Joint Force that such superiority continues into the future. However, the other Services’ ability to achieve lasting strategic results in any scenario short of total war is limited. Strike operations tend to be pre-emptive or punitive in nature and generally have limited impact on an opponent’s will. Air and sea power, separately or in combination, may temporarily compel or coerce an adversary to modify their behavior, but will not resolve the underlying 3Regionally Engaged Service and Sacrifice Wide Area Security
  • 6. Globally Responsive human causes of conflict in an enduring manner. As the Nation’s principal land force, the Army will continue to play the decisive strategic role in favorably resolving clashes of wills. Adaptive Army Leaders for a Complex World Educate and develop Soldiers, Leaders, and Civilians The Army will continue to invest in the development and education of our people so that we continue to provide adaptive leaders for a complex world. We must retain tactical competence and technical proficiency while cultivating strategic perspective and leadership at the senior NCO, field grade, and general officer ranks. Fostering the individual toughness, battlefield skills and fighting spirit that have always typified the American Soldier will continue. An uncertain and ambiguous future makes developing adaptive leaders critical to our continued success. Actively managing talent through assignments and education to broaden leader experience and better align individual desires with Army requirements becomes even more important for retaining high quality people. We are using many tools, such as 360-degree Multi- Source Assessment and Feedback (MSAF), to provide the candid and honest feedback necessary to develop leaders for future responsibilities. We will continue to evolve our school system to provide the right education and training to the right individuals at the right time. We will broaden joint and interagency school and exchange opportunities to ensure a common knowledge of Unified Action partner capabilities. Our current virtual training environments are expanding training opportunities 4 COMPEL SUPPORT INFLUENCE Affecting Populations, Their Governments, and Militaries Domains Land, Air, Maritime, Space and Cyberspace Range of Military Operations Military Engagement Crisis Response Major Operations Strategic Landpower Uniquely Positioned to Win the Clash of Wills Special Operations - Conventional Force Interdependence
  • 7. Regionally Engaged and offering units multiple operational settings that compliment live training. When augmented with emerging training approaches such as the Adaptive Soldier Leader Training and Education (ASLTE), the combination of live, virtual, and constructive training allows units to refine fundamental warfighting skills while solving complex problems in new and unfamiliar environments. Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged Designed and Organized to Support the Joint Force Just as a painter blends various colors to create the exact shade needed, the proper tailoring of forces provides the right capabilities to accomplish missions across the range of military operations. The Army will provide deployable and scalable regionally- focused forces task organized for direct support of Geographic and Functional Combatant Commands and Joint requirements. Stability operations in Iraq and Afghanistan demonstrated the effectiveness of combined arms teams with the right mix of combat power, sustainment, and support for civil authorities. By appropriately task organizing lethal and non- lethal capabilities, Army forces will continue to create asymmetric challenges the enemy cannot effectively address. To become more globally responsive, the Army requires formations that deploy more quickly to austere environments while retaining the lethality, protection, and tactical mobility of our current units. We are focused on creating smaller Brigade Combat Teams and other formations that require less infrastructure, while delivering same or better combat power by 2025. Focused scientific research, technological advancements, and experimentation conducted during demanding multi-echelon joint and combined training events will allow innovative solutions to our challenges. As the Army prepares for future operations, the ability to create asymmetric challenges for our adversaries plays an essential role in shaping and setting theaters for regional commanders. The Army will utilize its unique characteristics and capabilities to influence the security environment, build trusting relationships, and gain access through rotational forces, multilateral exercises, mil-to-mil engagements, coalition training, and other opportunities. Regionally-aligned forces from across the Total Army will provide geographic combatant commands with mission-tailored, scalable, regionally-trained, and culturally aware forces. Those forces will be responsive to all requirements, including operational missions, military exercises, and theater security cooperation activities. 2nd Brigade, First Infantry Division was the first BCT to execute the regionally aligned concept over the past year, in support of U.S. Africa Command. As part of the Combatant Commander’s security cooperation plan, groups of Soldiers ranging from small teams to entire formations began engagement operations with 34 African nations. Regionally aligned, mission tailored forces will play an essential role in the rebalance of our strategic focus to the Asia-Pacific region while still maintaining 5 Educate and Develop Coalition Training
  • 8. our commitments elsewhere in the world. In addition to providing versatile, responsive and ready forces to combatant commanders, this initiative will help Soldiers maintain the expeditionary mindset essential to a scalable and ready modern Army. The Army will provide Combatant Commanders the capability to rapidly deploy, fight, and win whenever and wherever our national interests are threatened. A Ready and Modern Army Adapting today…Evolving tomorrow… Innovating for the future Preparing for the future requires the Army to develop an intellectual framework, evolve capabilities in the mid-term, and innovate for the distant future so that we maintain our competitive edge for the range of most likely and dangerous threats we will face. We must, however, sustain the ability to effectively respond against near-term challenges because our opponents will never give the U.S. a “break” to pursue continued qualitative advantages. The first step for both evolution and innovation is a careful review of the lessons learned in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other regions during the past decade. These contribute to the intellectual framework necessary for analyzing the future operational environment (OE), which in turn helps us understand the character of the “next battle” and the “battle after next.” The Army will develop concepts for solving challenges identified in the OE, and then analyze those concepts to identify doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership and education, personnel, and facilities solutions. The Army has already begun reorganizing Brigade Combat Teams as a result of this effort, increasing the number of maneuver battalions in armored and infantry brigades to provide greater capability and versatility in future operations. Globally Responsive6 Shape and Set Theaters Ready and Modern
  • 9. Effective future innovation requires science and technology investments focused on game-changing landpower technologies to counter emerging threats. Our intent is to provide small units with capabilities that ensure tactical overmatch while delivering a decisive materiel edge across the range of military operations, to include the space and cyberspace domains as well as for counter weapon of mass destruction missions. For example, adversaries are developing an array of anti-access and area denial capabilities to defeat a United States forced entry into an area of operation. Both time and secure ports (or staging bases) are assets we cannot count on in a future contingency operation. We will need to quickly deploy a robust, capable, and survivable force under austere conditions, something current brigade combat teams (BCT) cannot do quickly or capably enough as currently equipped. Investment in materials science holds the potential of a major breakthrough that provides greater protection at a fraction of the weight of current armor. Such a dramatic change in the weight-protection ratio would enable strategic maneuver of mobile protected firepower from home station directly to the crisis in a matter of days instead of weeks or months. Materials science is only one of a number of possibilities to leverage science and technology. Advanced computing that enhances mission command and human sciences that improve Soldier physical and cognitive performance are two exciting areas of scientific research that require focused investment to reach their potential. These types of basic science and technology research (S&T) will ensure our future qualitative edge, and it would be a significant mistake to risk that advantage for small economies today. Our focus on innovation, coupled with realistic and demanding experimentation that uses regular Soldiers in simulated combat environments, will allow significant improvements to our expeditionary capabilities by 2025. We will make best use of scarce resources by ensuring we have realistic and cost effective solutions to the problems that hinder the Nation’s ability to project strategic landpower. We will need to make tough decisions about resources, but the end result will be smaller, more agile brigade combat teams with the same or better capabilities than we have today. Sustaining the competitive advantages the Army provides to the Nation will drive many tough choices. Joint operations depend on the Army’s ability to provide mission command (art of command, science of control, and the capability and capacity to conduct both) and the logistics necessary to support operations in austere environments. The Army will continue to provide joint and combined forces with expeditionary and enduring landpower, which includes the unique competencies of operational leadership, mobility, command and control, and theater logistics. Furthermore, the Army’s tactical and operational mobility and firepower will remain essential to the successful prosecution of every operation from theater sustainment to close combat. Army communication, tactical transportation, and sustainment functions are interwoven into every aspect of joint operations and will remain so in the future. Too deep cuts to the Army will adversely affect our ability to effectively support the Joint Force. 7Regionally Engaged Focus on Science and Technology Critical Enablers
  • 10. Soldiers Committed to Our Army Profession Citizen, Volunteer, Soldier, Professional, Patriot The Soldier remains the focal point for the Army: physically and mentally strong, trained to perform a range of tasks and missions, and committed to our Army Profession. Soldiers are the reason the United States Army remains a versatile, adaptive force respected by our friends and feared by our enemies. Soldiers will remain the foundation of our Army’s strength, living the values of our Profession daily and exhibiting the character, competence, and commitment that are hallmarks of an Army Professional. We will ensure that the American Soldier remains the most discriminately lethal force on the battlefield. “We must be able to rapidly adjust our units and capabilities to meet the unique requirements of any situation, delivering precision results through the most capable, discriminate weapon system ever fielded — the American soldier.” General Raymond T. Odierno, 38th Chief of Staff, U.S. Army This versatility is both a result and inherent quality of the premier all-volunteer force’s organization, training, and equipment. The Premier All Volunteer Army Army Strong The Army has been, is today, and will remain in the future, the strength of our Nation. Military expertise, honorable service, esprit de corps, and professional stewardship mark our Army’s heritage as defender of our Nation in peace and war since 1775. The Army will remain the most highly-trained and professional All-Volunteer land force in the world. By enforcing a professional environment across our Army that promotes and respects the individual dignity of every Soldier and Civilian, we will allow them to realize their full potential. As the Army transitions from combat operations in Afghanistan to preparing for the challenges of 2025 and beyond, we require the focused thinking, investment, and experimentation that leads to innovation. We will develop the concepts that drive investments in future capabilities while ensuring our Army remains trained and ready for today’s complex world. When the Nation calls, we will provide scalable and ready organizations with modern equipment, resourceful leaders willing to take reasonable risks, and the indomitable American Soldier to prevent conflict, shape the operational environment and win decisively. “While we cannot predict the future of our increasingly uncertain and complex strategic environment, we can be certain that our Nation will continue to call on America’s Army. “ General Raymond T. Odierno, 38th Chief of Staff, U.S. Army 8 Globally Responsive, Regionally Engaged Premier All-Volunteer Army Most discriminately lethal
  • 11. Soldier…Sergeant…Officer…Civilian Active…Guard…Reserve Peace…Crisis…War Trained and Ready…At home and Abroad This We Will Defend Strength of the Nation Army Strong! L O Y A L T Y D U T Y R E S P E C T S E L F L E S S S E R V I C E H O N O R I N T E G R I T Y P E R S O N A L C O U R A G E What Endures The 187 Campaign Streamers that adorn the Army flag today are proud testimony to our Army’s service
  • 12. For more information, contact the Army Capabilities Integration Center http://www.arcic.army.mil/