Trends Shaping Sustainable Land Use in the Next Decade
1. Copyrighted Material
The following presentation was prepared by UrbanGreen ® of
San Francisco, CA for presentation in Honolulu District Council
Cop
of ULI on 11 December 2012
This copy of the presentation is shared to advance discussion of
sustainability and more responsible development patterns. Reuse
- in whole or in part - of any or all parts of this presentation
should be requested prior to use. The author reserves the right
to grant reuse permission based purpose.
Permission can be obtained by contacting Jim Heid at
jim@urbangreen.net
6. A Disrupted Industry
Do Real Estate? Shape the Built
Environment?
“..all land and “ manmade
improvements surroundings that
that are provide the setting
immovable” for human activity ”
Wikipedia
Webster’s Dictionary
9. Sustainability 1.0:
1987 – 1995
DEFINING
ü Principles
and
Pla+tudes
ü Theories
and
White
Papers
ü The
Call
to
Ac+on
10. “Sustainable development is
development that meets the needs of
the present without compromising the
ability of future generations to meet
their own needs.”
Bruntland
Commission,
1987
11.
12.
13. Sustainability 2.0:
1996 – 2005
ORGANIZING
ü Checklists
and
Ra+ng
Methods
ü The
Arms
Race
for
Bragging
Rights
ü Technology
and
Added
Cost
14.
15. RANGE
OF
ESTIDAMA
Envisions
Defines
and
Measures
Informs
Conserva9on
Development
Guidelines
Urban
Braille
+
2030
Plans
Roofscapes
Guidelines
Streetscape
Design
Development
Pearls
Design
Manual
Code
System
28. Singular Definition to Integrated Hallmarks
Contributes to the environment, region and surrounding communities;
Healthy systems, natural and man-made;
Inter-generational and demographically diverse;
Carbon neutral at a minimum, carbon negative at best;
Memorable and enduring quality of place;
Evolutionary framework that is flexible and adaptable;
Economically successful – both community and enterprise;
Evolves governance from the community;
Openly shares lessons, so others can build on its success.
Source:
UrbanGreen
for
the
Urban
Land
Ins+tute
Tradi+on
PAS,
2008
29. “….if we are to remain competitive
into the 21st century, we must learn to
think in new ways, to ask new
questions, and seek new responses to
the emerging issues that are shaping
the industry.
The Ecology of Development, Urban Land Institute 1997
32. “….there has been a Responsibility Value
Premium in offices, apartments and retail
caused by higher NOIs and/or lower cap
rates. Higher NOI was from higher rents,
occupancy, and/or lower expenses”
Gary Pivo | Jeffrey Fischer
Income, Value and Returns of Socially Responsible Office Properties
34. Biggest Impediment? No Value
Lack of Enterprise Leadership
Current Economics of Industry
Too Many Conflicting Standards
Lack of End User Premium
Capital Providers do not Ascribe Value
Regulators Make it Too Difficult
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
Source:
UrbanGreen
Index
V12.1
35. Why Do It? To Add Value
Branding Strategy
Motivates our Team
Required by Investors
Entitlement Strategy
Required by Local Regulations
Market Differentiator
Improve Performance
Add Value
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
Source:
UrbanGreen
Index
V12.1
36. Why Do It? To Add Value
Branding Strategy
Motivates our Team
Required by Investors
Entitlement Strategy
Hawaii
National
Required by Local Regulations
Market Differentiator
Improve Performance
Add Value
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%
38. The Cost of Misaligned Regulations
Envisioning
En+tlement
Execu+on
Diminished Sustainability + Increased Costs
39. Biggest Impediment to Greater Adoption?
Lack of Enterprise Leadership
Current Economics of Industry
Hawaii
Too Many Conflicting Standards Na+onal
Lack of End User Premium
Capital Providers do not Ascribe
Value
Regulators Make it Too Difficult
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
Source:UrbanGreen
Index
Volume
12.1
40. New Solutions Requires New Models
Source:
Roadmap
for
the
Integrated
Design
Process,
BC
Green
Building
Roundtable
41. #3: The Capital Gap
Is Reduced Risk in an
Uncertain Future
Worth Something?
45. Some Common Themes
Now
Then
Thriving
VS.
Sustainable
Healthy
Community
VS.
Planned
Community
Climate
Adapta+on
VS.
Climate
Change
Mobility
+
Accessibility
VS.
Level
of
Service
Sharing
VS.
Owning
Facilita+ng
VS.
Developing
51. Sharing Everything – Development Risk
HOPE SF Principles:
1. Ensure No Loss of Public Housing
2. Create an Economically Integrated Community
3. Maximize the Creation of New Affordable Housing
4. Involve Residents in the Highest Levels of Participation in Entire Project
5. Provide Economic Opportunities Through the Rebuilding Process
6. Integrate Process with Neighborhood Improvement Revitalization Plans
7. Create Environmentally Sustainable and Accessible Communities
8. Build a Strong Sense of Community.
52.
Image
Credit:
Bridge
Housing
–
Van
Meter
Williams
Pollack
61. Measuring Behavior
“….
CycleTracks uses smartphone
GPS support to record users' bicycle
trip routes and times, and display
maps of their rides, in order to help
transportation planners make
informed decisions about bicycle use
in the community…..”
h@p://www.sfcta.org/content/category/12/97/483/
71. “UrbanGreen® is dedicated to real estate development
as a constructive endeavor that positively shapes the
urban, rural and human environment.”
Questions? Comments? | jim@urbangreen.net
72. Protected Presentation Content
The
following
presenta+on
was
prepared
by
UrbanGreen
®
of
San
Francisco,
CA
for
presenta+on
at
the
Missouri
Area
Regional
Council
on
2
May
2012.
Permission
to
reuse
any
or
all
parts
of
this
presenta+on
should
be
requested
before
reproducing,
extrac+ng
or
copying
–
in
whole
or
in
part
–any
component
of
this
presenta+on.
Permission
can
be
obtained
by
contac+ng
Jim
Heid
at
jim@urbangreen.net