Se ha denunciado esta presentación.
Se está descargando tu SlideShare. ×

Web-Scale Discovery: Post Implementation

Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Cargando en…3
×

Eche un vistazo a continuación

1 de 31 Anuncio

Web-Scale Discovery: Post Implementation

Descargar para leer sin conexión

Discovery services provide users a single
search box to access a library’s entire prei-ndexed collection. Representatives from
two academic libraries serving different
user populations will discuss marketing,
instructing users, evaluating the product,
and maintaining the resource after a
discovery service is implemented

Discovery services provide users a single
search box to access a library’s entire prei-ndexed collection. Representatives from
two academic libraries serving different
user populations will discuss marketing,
instructing users, evaluating the product,
and maintaining the resource after a
discovery service is implemented

Anuncio
Anuncio

Más Contenido Relacionado

Presentaciones para usted (20)

A los espectadores también les gustó (20)

Anuncio

Similares a Web-Scale Discovery: Post Implementation (20)

Más de Rachel Vacek (20)

Anuncio

Más reciente (20)

Web-Scale Discovery: Post Implementation

  1. 1. Web-­‐Scale  Discovery:     Post  Implementa8on   Richard  Guajardo,  Head  of  Resource  Discovery  Systems    and  Rachel  Vacek,  Head  of  Web  Services   TLA  Annual  Conference,  Houston,  TX   April  20,  2012  
  2. 2. What  is  a  discovery  service?   Through  one  simple  search  to  a  single  unified   index,  the  Summon  service  provides  …  one  search   box  for  a  researcher  to  enter  any  terms  they  want   and  quickly  get  credible  results  in  one  relevancy   ranked-­‐list.     Content  types  include:  library  catalog  records,  e-­‐journal   ar7cles,  databases,  newspaper  ar7cles,    e-­‐books,   disserta7ons,  ins7tu7onal  repositories,  conference   proceedings,  grey  literature,  cited  references,  reports,   digital  library,  more…  
  3. 3. Pathway  to  Discovery   •  Metafind   •  LibraryFind   •  ResearchPro   •  Encore  
  4. 4. Selec8on  
  5. 5. Why  Summon?   •  It  would  index  over  90%  of  our  subscribed  resources   •  Already  heavily  invested  in  the  Serials  Solu8ons  suite       of  services,  so  it  was  thought  that  Summon  would       integrate  well  with  those   •  Summon  promised  a  rela8vely  painless  turnkey       implementa8on   •  One  of  the  first  web-­‐scale  discovery  products  out  of     the  gate   •  Already  had  a  number  of  large  academic  library       customers    who    seemed    sa8sfied  with    the    results      
  6. 6. Implementa8on  Team   Head  of  Integrated  Library  Systems     Head  of  Cataloging  &  Electronic  Resources     Head  of  Web  Services     History  &  Poli8cal  Science  Librarian     Digital  &  Web  Projects  Fellow    
  7. 7. Implementa8on   Project  implementa8on   began  in  April  2010   OneSearch  debuted   in  August  2010   ContentDM        MARC  mapping  table      LibGuides    MARC  record  loads  
  8. 8. User  feedback   “This  is  great,  why  didn’t  you  do  this  years  ago?”     “a  confusing  bunch  of  results  in  all  media”     “I  can  go  straight  into  an  ebook  –     I  don’t  have  to  click  again  and  again.”     “OneSearch  is  confusing  to  me,     because  it  searches  everything.”  
  9. 9. One  Search  [Box]  
  10. 10. Technical  Challenges   •  Number  of  catalog   records   •  Consor8al  holdings   •  Post  implementa8on   clean  up  of  catalog   •  Ongoing   maintenance   •  Daily  update  limits  
  11. 11. Organiza8onal  Change   New  library  department  created:   Resource  Discovery  Systems  (RDS)     RDS  has  responsibility  for  Summon,  the   Millennium  ILS  and  electronic  resources   management        
  12. 12. Organiza8onal  Change   A  post  implementa8on  commigee  was  formed:   Discovery  Systems  Working  Group     The  commigee  is  charged  with  coordina8ng   data  exchange  between  discovery  system   vendors  and  the  shared  ILS.  It  also  stays   abreast  of  discovery  system  ini8a8ves  at  other   area  library  systems.  
  13. 13. Usage  
  14. 14. Pre  Summon  vs.  Post  Summon   Journals  2010  
  15. 15. Pre  Summon  vs.  Post  Summon   Database  Searches  2010  
  16. 16. Pre  Summon  vs.  Post  Summon   Database  Sessions  2010  
  17. 17. Marke8ng  &  Branding   •  To  name  or  not  to  name   •  Library  has  new  website,     now  with  OneSearch   •  Engaged  in  conversa8on   –  New  way  to  search  the  library   –  Discover  new  resources   –  Search  across  Research  Guides,  Databases,  Digital   Library,  Finding  Aids,  Catalog  –  all  from  one  search   box  
  18. 18. Web  Presence  Integra8on  
  19. 19. Research  Guides  Integra8on  
  20. 20. Subject-­‐based  Search  Widgets  
  21. 21. Mobile  Integra8on  
  22. 22. Discovery  Day  Camp   •  ½  day  conference   on  discovery   •  72  people  agended   from  around  Texas   •  Vendors  and   librarians  from   public,  academic,   medical,  law  and   school  libraries  
  23. 23. “I  enjoyed  the  discussions  and  I  came  away  with  a  much  beger   understanding  of  web  discovery  tools.”   “The  networking  and  hearing  what  other   ins8tu8ons  are  doing  was  really  valuable.”   “I  enjoyed  interac8ng  with  vendors  and  speaking  with  colleagues   about  their  experiences.  This  program  was  excellent  –  so   worthwhile!”   “Awesome  event!    Thank  you    UH  for  pulng  this  event  on!”   “It  was  good  to  hear  from  vendors  and  libraries  together  and   to  compare  the  products  and  services.”  
  24. 24. Assessment   •  Work  with  other  ins8tu8ons   –  UH  Downtown  and  UH  Clear  Lake   •  Discovery  Systems  Working  Group   –  Ongoing  maintenance,  assessment,  vendor  info  from   reps   •  It’s  All  About  Access  (IA3)  Commigee   –  Discuss  changes  in  discovery  and  access  to  unique   materials  across  web  presence   •  Web  Services   –  Usability  tes8ng  of  Libraries’  homepage  search  box   –  Explore  user  interface  op8ons  
  25. 25. Recep8on   •  Undergraduates   –  Like  the  “OneSearch”  box   –  Get  relevant  results  for  their  research   •  Faculty  /  Graduate  Students   –  Find  results  overwhelming,  too  difficult  to  drill  down   to  a  specific  item   –  More  open  do  known-­‐item  searching   –  Directed  to  familiar  and  exact  tools   –  Pushing  them  to  advanced  search   •  Librarians   –  Mixed  feelings,  depends  on  discipline  
  26. 26. Future  Plans   •  More  assessment!   •  Conduct  market  analysis  Summer  2012   •  Fall  2012  à  2/3  of  way  through  3-­‐year   Summon  contract   •  Integra8on  of  subject-­‐specific  Summon  search   boxes  within  Research  Guides  (Springshare   CampusGuides)   •  Usability  tes8ng  on  library  homepage  search   box  
  27. 27. Our  Final  Thoughts   •  Worth  it?    à  YES!   –  Usage  increased  at  astronomical  rates   –  Much  more  content  being  exposed   –  Undergrads  like  it  and  can  find  relevant  info   •  At  point  of  no  return   –  Web  presence  will  always  have  a  discovery  search   interface   –  Look  for  ways  to  improve  discovery  service  integra8on   and  more  accurate  search  results   –  Amount  of  print  materials  moving  to  electronic  format   will  con8nue  to  increase  
  28. 28. Credits   •  COUNTER  stats  (hgp://www.projectcounter.org/)   provided  by  Jeannie  Castro,  Electronic  Resources   Librarian  at  the  UH  Libraries  
  29. 29. Thanks!   Richard  Guajardo     Rachel  Vacek     Head  of  Resource     Head  of  Web  Services   Discovery  Systems   revacek@uh.edu   guajardo@uh.edu   Presenta8on  available:  hgp://www.slideshare.net/vacekrae/  

Notas del editor

  • What I did here is take an average of the spring and summer semesters pre summon COUNTER Stats to give a better reflection of what was going on, I then divided it into our post summon COUNTER stats to give a percentage change in use figure.As you can see our Sage stats went through the roof and our Wiley and springer content became more discoverable. We stopped teaching JSTOR and project muse as go to places, so while they did rise in use, not that dramatically. There was only a 5% increase in students between 2009 & 2010, which would have made this increase believable.
  • As you can see our ASP and ProQuest searches COUNTER stats went through the roof as well. EI and First search not indexed in summon thus decreased. I know it shows 94% increase, but further analysis shows that it is our World Cat usage that is what is inflating these statistics (116% for searches). If you discount the WorldCat numbers, FirstSearch searches actually decreased by -38%
  • Numbers pulled from the COUNTER Code of Practice Release 3 DB1 (Total Searches and Sessions by Month and Database) report, whereby the definition of a session means “A successful request of an online service. It is one cycle of user activities that typically starts when a user connects to the service or database and ends by terminating activity that is either explicit (by leaving the service through exit or logout) or implicit (timeout due to user inactivity).”Again, similar situation regarding session stats. Our Gale stats have decreased tremendously, but since we get this through our TexShare consortium, we will never cancel it. However, if there are any gale reps here in the audience, please improve your interface. I hear from our Liaison's that it is what turns students off to using it. That and the consistently bad metadata that comes from the Gale Cengage product into Summon prevents students from connecting to the content. They give up rather than try to get the material.

×