SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 9
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Agricultural Issues Center
                                                                   University of California

                                                                   Created February 2006




                       Commodity Profile: Peanuts
                            by Hayley Boriss, Junior Specialist
                             Marcia Kreith, Program Analyst
                                Agricultural Issues Center
                                 University of California
                                 agissues@ucdavis.edu

Introduction
Peanuts are thought to have originated in South America where they would thrive in
tropical and subtropical climates. Because the edible seeds of this annual legume plant
start above ground but mature underground, peanuts are also known as groundpeas or
groundnuts. In the United States, peanuts were considered a regional food of the South
until after the Civil War, when technological advancements resulted in an increased
demand for peanut oil, peanut butter, roasted and salted peanuts, and confections. In
addition, George Washington Carver has been credited with identifying numerous
manufactured nonfood uses for the peanut and plant parts and encouraging plantings of
peanuts as a rotational crop for cotton production, thereby expanding acreage in the early
1900s (Phillips; Virginia-Carolina Peanut Promotions; American Peanut Council).

Government Subsidies and the 2002 Farm Bill
The Farm Security and Investment Act of 2002 (2002 Farm Bill) transformed the
previously long-standing government programs for peanuts which included a marketing
quota system. The former quota system limited production by setting a limit on the
amount of peanuts to be sold in the domestic market, diverting those peanuts that
exceeded the quota into a lower value processing market for oil and meal or to be
exported. At the time the quota system ceased there were roughly 70,000 quota owners
operating 9,000 peanut farms. Quota owners received buyout payments, either in the
form of annual payments over a four-year period or as a lump sum payment. The 2002
act changed the long-standing federal program for peanuts. It gave peanut producers the
same familiar subsidies of direct payments, marketing loans, and counter-cyclical
payments that are available to producers of grain, oilseed and cotton.

Direct payments are paid to producers based on historical production and are linked to
current prices or output only indirectly. Counter-cyclical payments use a basis of
previous production dependant upon national prices and marketing loan benefits rely on
federal compensation in response to low market prices. Marketing loan benefits are
available when the price of peanuts is below the legislated U.S. loan rates. Eligibility for


                                             1
both the direct payments and the counter-cyclical payments restrict crops eligible for base
acres. The new government loan rate for peanuts established by the 2002 act is 17.75
cents per pound. In years where peanut prices are low, counter cyclical payments and
marketing loan payments are more substantial (Economic Research Service (ERS) 2005).
In 2004, government payments from the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) for
peanuts were valued at $259 million, or roughly 2 percent of the $10.6 billion in total
CCC outlays for the year. In addition, the peanut sector also received monetary support
for peanut storage and handling fees. Government payments account for roughly 30
percent of cash receipts from peanut production (Dohlman and Livezey).

Demand
Peanuts have been marketed as a cheap source of protein compared to cheese and red
meat and as a good source of essential vitamins and minerals. With decreasing prices and
increasing production of peanuts, U.S. demand for peanuts has remained strong over the
last decade and a half, estimated at 6.3 pounds per capita in 2003 (ERS). This is lower
than the 1989 high of 7 pounds per capita, although per capita consumption has remained
relatively stable since the mid 1990s. The majority of consumption in the United States
is attributed to peanuts used as a food source, as opposed to oil or meal, and peanut butter
has been and remains the largest source of consumption on a per pound basis. Per capita
consumption of peanut butter has remained stable since the mid 1990s following a peak
in consumption at 3.6 pounds per capita in 1989. In 2003, peanut butter consumption
was estimated to be 3.1 pounds per capita, or just under half of total peanut consumption.
Peanuts consumed as snacks and in candy are also popular forms of consumption, with
consumption per capita in 2003 at 1.3 and 1.4 pounds respectively (Figure 1).

Exports
    The United States is a net exporter of peanuts, and in 2004 exports totaled $223
million, surpassing imports by roughly $100 million. However, exports have followed a
generally decreasing trend, although with some variability, over the last decade. The
percentage of total production exported has also decreased, from just over 25 percent in
1986 to 13 percent in 2004 (Figure 2). For the United States, the largest export market
for peanut products is Canada, receiving 35 percent of the U.S. peanut export value in
2004, followed by the Netherlands with 16 percent, Mexico 10 percent, and the United
Kingdom with 8 percent (Figure 3). Worldwide, China the largest exporter of peanuts
followed by Argentina and the United States (Figure 4). The U.S. reputation for high-
quality products has enabled exports to countries in the EU and others, but phytosanitary
requirements and aflotoxin contamination have become increasingly contentious issues in
world peanut trade.

Imports
In 2004, the United States imported nearly $114 million worth of peanuts and peanut
products. The total value of peanut imports over the last decade has been variable with a
notable drop in 2003, following the last year of the marketing quota system, and a
dramatic increase in 2004, due almost entirely to an increase in imports of peanut oil
(Figure 5). A lower supply of peanut oil coupled with higher prices for soybean oil
(considered a peanut oil substitute) created a shortage in supply, which helps explain the



                                             2
significant rise in peanut oil imports (ERS 2005 Yearbook). In 1995 crude peanut oil had
made up just 4 percent of imports and peanut butter 37 percent. But ten years later crude
peanut oil made up 67 percent of total imports and the share of peanut butter had fallen to
22 percent. India supplied three-quarters of U.S. crude peanut oil imports in 2004, valued
at $58 million, after not having shipped any peanut oil to the United States a decade
previous. This increase made India the leading supplier of peanuts to the United States,
followed by Canada, Argentina, and Mexico. Argentina’s exports to the United States
fell steeply in 2003 following a reduction in exports of raw shelled peanuts, from $30
million in 2002 to essentially zero by 2004. Canada was the second largest exporting
country to the United States in 2004 and U.S. imports from Canada have remained
relatively stable at around $25 million in recent years. Mexico rounds out the top four
exporting countries to the United States (Figure 5). As part of the GATT 1994 Uruguay
Round Agreement a U.S. tariff-rate quota was established for peanuts, allowing a greater
amount of imports to enter the United States and, under the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA), Mexican peanut imports to the U.S. will be tariff free by 2008.

Supply
According to USDA’s Foreign Agricultural Service, China is by far the largest producer
of peanuts, with more than double the production of India, the world’s second largest
peanut producer. The United States is ranked third in terms of world production followed
by Argentina and Vietnam (FASb).

    Since the 2002 Farm Bill and the elimination of the quota system, the most efficient
U.S. producers have been able to expand production while less efficient producers have
decreased production or opted out of peanut production all together. In addition,
producers are now free to move to regions where they are more likely to recover better
yields (Dohlman and Livezey).

    Total U.S. peanut production has varied around 4 billion pounds, ranging from a high
of 4.9 billion in 1992 to lows of around 3.3 billion in 1984, 2001, and again in 2003. In
2004 production reached 4.1 billion pounds (Figure 6). In 2003, yields reached their
highest values ever at 3,159 pounds per acre, likely the result of good weather and
increased efficiency (Figure 7).

    Harvested acreage has decreased from a peak of 2.1 million acres in 1991 to about 1.4
million acres in 2004. Georgia is the leading peanut producer in the United States,
followed by Texas (Figure 8). While total U.S. harvested acreage has not varied
considerably since 1996, there has been an increasing amount of divergence of harvested
acreage between states in the last 2 years as Texas acreage has decreased and Georgia’s
increased. In 2002, Georgia accounted for 39.1 percent and Texas 21.7 percent of
harvested acreage. In 2004, Georgia increased this percentage to 43.8 percent of total
harvested acreage in the nation, while harvested acreage in Texas decreased to 16.9
percent.

     In nominal terms, the peak value of production occurred in 1991 when it reached $1.4
billion (Figure 9). The total value of U.S. peanut production declined to about $834



                                            3
million in 2004. This ranks peanuts as the third most important oilseed crop in value
terms behind soybeans, which were worth $16.1 billion in 2004 and cottonseed worth
$874 million.

Prices
Prices for peanuts have fallen since 1980, with significant decreases seen in the year
preceding and following the 2002 farm bill. U.S. peanut prices (in year-2000 inflation-
adjusted dollars) fell from 27 cents per pound in 2000, to 18 cents per pound in 2002.
However, since the switch to a loan rate system prices have not fallen below the 17.75
cents per pound loan rate, remaining relatively stable throughout 2003 and 2004. In 2004
peanuts were valued at 18 cents per pound (Figure 10).

Sources
American Peanut Council. Dataweb. Available at :
    http://www.peanutsusa.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.page&pid=12

Dohlman, Eric and Janet Livezey. 2005. “Peanut Backgrounder. United States
    Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (ERS). Report Number
    OC-05i-01. Available at: www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/OCS/Oct05/OCS05I01/

Phillips, Samuel. The Incredible Peanut Ethnobotanical Leaflet. Southern Illinois
      University Herbarium. Available at: http://www.siiu.edu/~ebl/leaflets/peanut.htm

United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (ERS). 2004. Oil
     Crops Yearbook, March 2005. Available at:
     http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/erssor/field/ocs-bby/ocs2005.pdf

_____(2005). CCC Net Outlays by Commodity and Function, Table 35. 2005.
      Available at:
      http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/agoutlook/aotables/2005/12dec/aotab35.xls

_____Food Consumption (per capita) Data System.
      http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/foodconsumption/FoodAvailQueriable.aspx

United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS). Trade
Database. Available at: http://www.fas.usda.gov/ustrade/

_____(b). Production, Supply, and Distribution Database. Available at:
      http://www.fas.usda.gov/psd/complete_files/default.asp

Virginia-Carolina Peanut Promotions. A Short Peanut History. Available at:
     http://www..aboutpeanuts.com/infohis.html




                                           4
FIGURES

Figure 1: U.S. Per Capita Peanut Consumption, 1985-2003
 Pounds
 8

                             Total
 6



 4
                             Peanut Butter


 2
                                             Candy
                                                Snack
 0
  1985        1988        1991          1994         1997        2000      2003

Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Per Capita Data System


Figure 2: Share of U.S. Peanut Production Exported, 1984-2004
 Percent
 30%
               25.4%
 25%

 20%

 15%

                                                                        12.5%
 10%

  5%

  0%
     1984         1988           1992           1996            2000       2004
Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Oil Crops Yearbook


                                         5
Figure 3: Leading U.S. Peanut Export Markets (Raw, Oil, and Butter), 1995-2004
 Dollars (million)
 350                     All Countries            Canada                 Netherlands
                         Mexico                   United Kingdom
 300

 250

 200

 150

 100

  50

   0
   1995       1996       1997     1998    1999      2000    2001    2002     2003      2004

Source: USDA Foreign Agricultural Service


Figure 4. Top Five World Producers and Exporters of Peanuts, 2004
 Metric Tons (1,000)
 16,000

 14,000

 12,000                                   Production

 10,000                                   Exports

  8,000

  6,000

  4,000

  2,000

       0
                 India          Vietnam     United States    Argentina        China
Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Supply, Production, and Demand Data




                                              6
Figure 5: U.S. Peanut Imports, All Countries and by Country Source, 1990-2004
 Dollars (million)
 150
                     All Countries             India                 Canada
                     Argentina                 Mexico
 125

 100

  75

  50

  25

     0
     1990        1992        1994       1996        1998    2000      2002        2004

Source: USDA Foreign Agricultural Service


Figure 6: U.S. Peanut Production, 1984-2004
 Pounds (billion)
 6
                                      4.9 billion pounds
 5

 4

 3
                                                                          3.3 billion
                                                                           pounds
 2

 1

 0
  1984               1988            1992            1996          2000           2004
Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Oil Crops Yearbook




                                               7
Figure 7: U.S. Peanut Yields Per Harvested Acre, 1980-2004
 Pounds per Acre
 3,300
                                                               3,159 pounds

 3,000

 2,700

 2,400

 2,100
                                    1,985 pounds
 1,800

 1,500
       1980         1984    1988        1992         1996    2000       2004

Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Oil Crops Yearbook


Figure 8: U.S. Harvested Peanut Acreage, 1980-2004
 Acres (million)
 2.4
                                        U.S.
 2.0

 1.6


 1.2

                                        Georgia
 0.8

 0.4
                                                  Texas
 0.0
    1980           1984    1988        1992          1996    2000       2004

Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Oil Crops Yearbook




                                        8
Figure 9: U.S. Value of Peanut Production, 1980-2004
 Dollars (billion)
 2.0


                                              $1.39 billion
 1.5



 1.0



 0.5
                                                                              $600 million


 0.0
    1980             1984          1988       1992            1996          2000           2004

Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Oil Crops Yearbook


Figure 10: U.S. Peanut Prices (year-2000 inflation-adjusted dollars), 1985-2004
 Dollars per pound
 0.50

                                             $0.43
 0.40

 0.30

 0.20

                                                                                   $0.18
 0.10

 0.00
     1980        1983       1986      1989     1992       1995       1998      2001        2004
Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Oil Crops Yearbook




                                               9

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

African Smallholder Farmers’ Perceptions and Attitudes towards Genetically Mo...
African Smallholder Farmers’ Perceptions and Attitudes towards Genetically Mo...African Smallholder Farmers’ Perceptions and Attitudes towards Genetically Mo...
African Smallholder Farmers’ Perceptions and Attitudes towards Genetically Mo...Premier Publishers
 
GCARD2: Briefing paper National Food Security - MAIZE and its importance for ...
GCARD2: Briefing paper National Food Security - MAIZE and its importance for ...GCARD2: Briefing paper National Food Security - MAIZE and its importance for ...
GCARD2: Briefing paper National Food Security - MAIZE and its importance for ...GCARD Conferences
 
CROP PROSPECTS and FOOD SITUATION, 2020
CROP PROSPECTS and FOOD SITUATION, 2020CROP PROSPECTS and FOOD SITUATION, 2020
CROP PROSPECTS and FOOD SITUATION, 2020priyanka raviraj
 
FT 2014-01-22 African Farming-2
FT 2014-01-22 African Farming-2FT 2014-01-22 African Farming-2
FT 2014-01-22 African Farming-2F Paraiso
 
Usda report january 2013
Usda report january 2013Usda report january 2013
Usda report january 2013joseleorcasita
 
National rice development strategy of ghana
National rice development strategy of ghanaNational rice development strategy of ghana
National rice development strategy of ghanaFatimata Kone
 
Usda report octubre 2012
Usda report octubre 2012Usda report octubre 2012
Usda report octubre 2012joseleorcasita
 
Sikich Agriculture Newsletter - Spring/Summer 2015 Edition
Sikich Agriculture Newsletter - Spring/Summer 2015 EditionSikich Agriculture Newsletter - Spring/Summer 2015 Edition
Sikich Agriculture Newsletter - Spring/Summer 2015 EditionSikich LLP
 
2nd july,2020 daily global regional local rice e newsletter
2nd july,2020 daily global regional local rice e newsletter2nd july,2020 daily global regional local rice e newsletter
2nd july,2020 daily global regional local rice e newsletterRiceplus Magazine
 
2nd july,2020 daily global regional local rice e newsletter (2)
2nd july,2020 daily global regional local rice e newsletter (2)2nd july,2020 daily global regional local rice e newsletter (2)
2nd july,2020 daily global regional local rice e newsletter (2)Riceplus Magazine
 
USAID and GM Food Aid
USAID and GM Food AidUSAID and GM Food Aid
USAID and GM Food AidP6P
 
11th march 2013 rice news by riceplus magazine(unedited)
11th march 2013 rice news by riceplus magazine(unedited)11th march 2013 rice news by riceplus magazine(unedited)
11th march 2013 rice news by riceplus magazine(unedited)Riceplus Magazine
 

La actualidad más candente (18)

African Smallholder Farmers’ Perceptions and Attitudes towards Genetically Mo...
African Smallholder Farmers’ Perceptions and Attitudes towards Genetically Mo...African Smallholder Farmers’ Perceptions and Attitudes towards Genetically Mo...
African Smallholder Farmers’ Perceptions and Attitudes towards Genetically Mo...
 
GCARD2: Briefing paper National Food Security - MAIZE and its importance for ...
GCARD2: Briefing paper National Food Security - MAIZE and its importance for ...GCARD2: Briefing paper National Food Security - MAIZE and its importance for ...
GCARD2: Briefing paper National Food Security - MAIZE and its importance for ...
 
The seed sector in the Philippines - Mercy Sombilla
The seed sector in the Philippines - Mercy SombillaThe seed sector in the Philippines - Mercy Sombilla
The seed sector in the Philippines - Mercy Sombilla
 
USDA Report May 2012
USDA Report May 2012USDA Report May 2012
USDA Report May 2012
 
CROP PROSPECTS and FOOD SITUATION, 2020
CROP PROSPECTS and FOOD SITUATION, 2020CROP PROSPECTS and FOOD SITUATION, 2020
CROP PROSPECTS and FOOD SITUATION, 2020
 
The seed sector in Indonesia- Erizal Jamal
  The seed sector in Indonesia- Erizal Jamal  The seed sector in Indonesia- Erizal Jamal
The seed sector in Indonesia- Erizal Jamal
 
FT 2014-01-22 African Farming-2
FT 2014-01-22 African Farming-2FT 2014-01-22 African Farming-2
FT 2014-01-22 African Farming-2
 
Usda report january 2013
Usda report january 2013Usda report january 2013
Usda report january 2013
 
National rice development strategy of ghana
National rice development strategy of ghanaNational rice development strategy of ghana
National rice development strategy of ghana
 
Usda report octubre 2012
Usda report octubre 2012Usda report octubre 2012
Usda report octubre 2012
 
Sikich Agriculture Newsletter - Spring/Summer 2015 Edition
Sikich Agriculture Newsletter - Spring/Summer 2015 EditionSikich Agriculture Newsletter - Spring/Summer 2015 Edition
Sikich Agriculture Newsletter - Spring/Summer 2015 Edition
 
Eeagri
EeagriEeagri
Eeagri
 
2nd july,2020 daily global regional local rice e newsletter
2nd july,2020 daily global regional local rice e newsletter2nd july,2020 daily global regional local rice e newsletter
2nd july,2020 daily global regional local rice e newsletter
 
Food security
Food securityFood security
Food security
 
2nd july,2020 daily global regional local rice e newsletter (2)
2nd july,2020 daily global regional local rice e newsletter (2)2nd july,2020 daily global regional local rice e newsletter (2)
2nd july,2020 daily global regional local rice e newsletter (2)
 
USAID and GM Food Aid
USAID and GM Food AidUSAID and GM Food Aid
USAID and GM Food Aid
 
11th march 2013 rice news by riceplus magazine(unedited)
11th march 2013 rice news by riceplus magazine(unedited)11th march 2013 rice news by riceplus magazine(unedited)
11th march 2013 rice news by riceplus magazine(unedited)
 
Usda report july 2012
Usda report july 2012Usda report july 2012
Usda report july 2012
 

Destacado

【Taiwan︰「 三百六十五里路」- 許_樂】
【Taiwan︰「 三百六十五里路」- 許_樂】【Taiwan︰「 三百六十五里路」- 許_樂】
【Taiwan︰「 三百六十五里路」- 許_樂】mw chuang
 
Nuevos enfoques sobre la Atlántida, la mítica región que según los griegos de...
Nuevos enfoques sobre la Atlántida, la mítica región que según los griegos de...Nuevos enfoques sobre la Atlántida, la mítica región que según los griegos de...
Nuevos enfoques sobre la Atlántida, la mítica región que según los griegos de...Ateneo de Montevideo
 
October Tech Fridays
October Tech FridaysOctober Tech Fridays
October Tech Fridayscroduin
 
Questionario Per Lesbiche F I N A L E C
Questionario Per Lesbiche  F I N A L E CQuestionario Per Lesbiche  F I N A L E C
Questionario Per Lesbiche F I N A L E Cfefx
 

Destacado (8)

Anastasia Filatova PORTFOLIO
Anastasia Filatova PORTFOLIOAnastasia Filatova PORTFOLIO
Anastasia Filatova PORTFOLIO
 
Pessach - A Páscoa Cristã
Pessach - A Páscoa CristãPessach - A Páscoa Cristã
Pessach - A Páscoa Cristã
 
Red On Stage
Red On StageRed On Stage
Red On Stage
 
Internet
InternetInternet
Internet
 
【Taiwan︰「 三百六十五里路」- 許_樂】
【Taiwan︰「 三百六十五里路」- 許_樂】【Taiwan︰「 三百六十五里路」- 許_樂】
【Taiwan︰「 三百六十五里路」- 許_樂】
 
Nuevos enfoques sobre la Atlántida, la mítica región que según los griegos de...
Nuevos enfoques sobre la Atlántida, la mítica región que según los griegos de...Nuevos enfoques sobre la Atlántida, la mítica región que según los griegos de...
Nuevos enfoques sobre la Atlántida, la mítica región que según los griegos de...
 
October Tech Fridays
October Tech FridaysOctober Tech Fridays
October Tech Fridays
 
Questionario Per Lesbiche F I N A L E C
Questionario Per Lesbiche  F I N A L E CQuestionario Per Lesbiche  F I N A L E C
Questionario Per Lesbiche F I N A L E C
 

Similar a UC Agricultural Issues Center Profile on Peanuts

Us dairy to world
Us dairy to worldUs dairy to world
Us dairy to worldJohn Walton
 
A Contrast of Market Driven versus Speculator Driven Vertical Agri Economy re...
A Contrast of Market Driven versus Speculator Driven Vertical Agri Economy re...A Contrast of Market Driven versus Speculator Driven Vertical Agri Economy re...
A Contrast of Market Driven versus Speculator Driven Vertical Agri Economy re...Roger Cunningham
 
Peanuts: Organic Production
Peanuts: Organic Production Peanuts: Organic Production
Peanuts: Organic Production Gardening
 
Marketing Organic Grains
Marketing Organic GrainsMarketing Organic Grains
Marketing Organic GrainsGardening
 
Perspectives On The World Food Situation 6
Perspectives On The World Food Situation 6Perspectives On The World Food Situation 6
Perspectives On The World Food Situation 6ECHO International Inc
 
The peruvian asparagus industry
The peruvian asparagus industryThe peruvian asparagus industry
The peruvian asparagus industryHung Pham Thai
 
Agro-Buzz | GM crops:The True Picture
Agro-Buzz | GM crops:The True PictureAgro-Buzz | GM crops:The True Picture
Agro-Buzz | GM crops:The True PictureGodrejAgrovet
 
Why the american peanut is the luckiet nut
Why the american peanut is the luckiet nutWhy the american peanut is the luckiet nut
Why the american peanut is the luckiet nutIrfan iftekhar
 
Transgenic Crops
Transgenic CropsTransgenic Crops
Transgenic CropsGardening
 
20080709 g8 hl-summit-paper-10_points
20080709 g8 hl-summit-paper-10_points20080709 g8 hl-summit-paper-10_points
20080709 g8 hl-summit-paper-10_pointsLichia Saner-Yiu
 
2012 Farm Bill forums - MO 5-1-11
2012 Farm Bill forums - MO 5-1-112012 Farm Bill forums - MO 5-1-11
2012 Farm Bill forums - MO 5-1-11Brad Jordahl Redlin
 
Corn-Based Ethanol and its Politics
Corn-Based Ethanol and its PoliticsCorn-Based Ethanol and its Politics
Corn-Based Ethanol and its PoliticsCarlos Rymer
 
AheadRace eLearning Module # 02 - Growth and Opportunity in the Organic Sector
AheadRace eLearning Module # 02 - Growth and Opportunity in the Organic SectorAheadRace eLearning Module # 02 - Growth and Opportunity in the Organic Sector
AheadRace eLearning Module # 02 - Growth and Opportunity in the Organic SectorSatyavardhan Reddy
 
GREEN REVOLUTION and its impact on socity.pdf
GREEN REVOLUTION and its impact on socity.pdfGREEN REVOLUTION and its impact on socity.pdf
GREEN REVOLUTION and its impact on socity.pdfsonalsinghal21
 
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Agribusiness | Q2 2018 | Segment: Crops and Cro...
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Agribusiness | Q2 2018 | Segment: Crops and Cro...Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Agribusiness | Q2 2018 | Segment: Crops and Cro...
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Agribusiness | Q2 2018 | Segment: Crops and Cro...Mercer Capital
 

Similar a UC Agricultural Issues Center Profile on Peanuts (20)

Us dairy to world
Us dairy to worldUs dairy to world
Us dairy to world
 
A Contrast of Market Driven versus Speculator Driven Vertical Agri Economy re...
A Contrast of Market Driven versus Speculator Driven Vertical Agri Economy re...A Contrast of Market Driven versus Speculator Driven Vertical Agri Economy re...
A Contrast of Market Driven versus Speculator Driven Vertical Agri Economy re...
 
Peanuts: Organic Production
Peanuts: Organic Production Peanuts: Organic Production
Peanuts: Organic Production
 
Marketing Organic Grains
Marketing Organic GrainsMarketing Organic Grains
Marketing Organic Grains
 
Perspectives On The World Food Situation 6
Perspectives On The World Food Situation 6Perspectives On The World Food Situation 6
Perspectives On The World Food Situation 6
 
The peruvian asparagus industry
The peruvian asparagus industryThe peruvian asparagus industry
The peruvian asparagus industry
 
Agro-Buzz | GM crops:The True Picture
Agro-Buzz | GM crops:The True PictureAgro-Buzz | GM crops:The True Picture
Agro-Buzz | GM crops:The True Picture
 
Research paper
Research paperResearch paper
Research paper
 
Why the american peanut is the luckiet nut
Why the american peanut is the luckiet nutWhy the american peanut is the luckiet nut
Why the american peanut is the luckiet nut
 
Global Wheat Market
Global Wheat MarketGlobal Wheat Market
Global Wheat Market
 
Transgenic Crops
Transgenic CropsTransgenic Crops
Transgenic Crops
 
20080709 g8 hl-summit-paper-10_points
20080709 g8 hl-summit-paper-10_points20080709 g8 hl-summit-paper-10_points
20080709 g8 hl-summit-paper-10_points
 
2012 Farm Bill forums - MO 5-1-11
2012 Farm Bill forums - MO 5-1-112012 Farm Bill forums - MO 5-1-11
2012 Farm Bill forums - MO 5-1-11
 
Research Paper- FINAL
Research Paper- FINALResearch Paper- FINAL
Research Paper- FINAL
 
Corn-Based Ethanol and its Politics
Corn-Based Ethanol and its PoliticsCorn-Based Ethanol and its Politics
Corn-Based Ethanol and its Politics
 
AheadRace eLearning Module # 02 - Growth and Opportunity in the Organic Sector
AheadRace eLearning Module # 02 - Growth and Opportunity in the Organic SectorAheadRace eLearning Module # 02 - Growth and Opportunity in the Organic Sector
AheadRace eLearning Module # 02 - Growth and Opportunity in the Organic Sector
 
Scifood lecture
Scifood lectureScifood lecture
Scifood lecture
 
GREEN REVOLUTION and its impact on socity.pdf
GREEN REVOLUTION and its impact on socity.pdfGREEN REVOLUTION and its impact on socity.pdf
GREEN REVOLUTION and its impact on socity.pdf
 
Rice seed policy in Thailand- Nipon Poapongsakorn
Rice seed policy in Thailand- Nipon PoapongsakornRice seed policy in Thailand- Nipon Poapongsakorn
Rice seed policy in Thailand- Nipon Poapongsakorn
 
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Agribusiness | Q2 2018 | Segment: Crops and Cro...
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Agribusiness | Q2 2018 | Segment: Crops and Cro...Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Agribusiness | Q2 2018 | Segment: Crops and Cro...
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Agribusiness | Q2 2018 | Segment: Crops and Cro...
 

Último

Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024Kirill Klimov
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdfAPRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdfRbc Rbcua
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...
Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...
Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...Americas Got Grants
 
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent ChirchirMarketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchirictsugar
 
PSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
PSCC - Capability Statement PresentationPSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
PSCC - Capability Statement PresentationAnamaria Contreras
 
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?Olivia Kresic
 
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort ServiceCall US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Servicecallgirls2057
 
Organizational Structure Running A Successful Business
Organizational Structure Running A Successful BusinessOrganizational Structure Running A Successful Business
Organizational Structure Running A Successful BusinessSeta Wicaksana
 
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdfDarshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdfShashank Mehta
 
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Anamaria Contreras
 
Digital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdf
Digital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdfDigital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdf
Digital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdfJos Voskuil
 
Cyber Security Training in Office Environment
Cyber Security Training in Office EnvironmentCyber Security Training in Office Environment
Cyber Security Training in Office Environmentelijahj01012
 
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...Seta Wicaksana
 
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607dollysharma2066
 
The-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptx
The-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptxThe-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptx
The-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptxmbikashkanyari
 

Último (20)

Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
 
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
 
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdfAPRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
 
Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...
Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...
Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...
 
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent ChirchirMarketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
 
PSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
PSCC - Capability Statement PresentationPSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
PSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
 
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
 
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort ServiceCall US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
 
Organizational Structure Running A Successful Business
Organizational Structure Running A Successful BusinessOrganizational Structure Running A Successful Business
Organizational Structure Running A Successful Business
 
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdfDarshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
 
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
 
Digital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdf
Digital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdfDigital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdf
Digital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdf
 
Cyber Security Training in Office Environment
Cyber Security Training in Office EnvironmentCyber Security Training in Office Environment
Cyber Security Training in Office Environment
 
No-1 Call Girls In Goa 93193 VIP 73153 Escort service In North Goa Panaji, Ca...
No-1 Call Girls In Goa 93193 VIP 73153 Escort service In North Goa Panaji, Ca...No-1 Call Girls In Goa 93193 VIP 73153 Escort service In North Goa Panaji, Ca...
No-1 Call Girls In Goa 93193 VIP 73153 Escort service In North Goa Panaji, Ca...
 
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
 
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
 
The-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptx
The-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptxThe-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptx
The-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptx
 

UC Agricultural Issues Center Profile on Peanuts

  • 1. Agricultural Issues Center University of California Created February 2006 Commodity Profile: Peanuts by Hayley Boriss, Junior Specialist Marcia Kreith, Program Analyst Agricultural Issues Center University of California agissues@ucdavis.edu Introduction Peanuts are thought to have originated in South America where they would thrive in tropical and subtropical climates. Because the edible seeds of this annual legume plant start above ground but mature underground, peanuts are also known as groundpeas or groundnuts. In the United States, peanuts were considered a regional food of the South until after the Civil War, when technological advancements resulted in an increased demand for peanut oil, peanut butter, roasted and salted peanuts, and confections. In addition, George Washington Carver has been credited with identifying numerous manufactured nonfood uses for the peanut and plant parts and encouraging plantings of peanuts as a rotational crop for cotton production, thereby expanding acreage in the early 1900s (Phillips; Virginia-Carolina Peanut Promotions; American Peanut Council). Government Subsidies and the 2002 Farm Bill The Farm Security and Investment Act of 2002 (2002 Farm Bill) transformed the previously long-standing government programs for peanuts which included a marketing quota system. The former quota system limited production by setting a limit on the amount of peanuts to be sold in the domestic market, diverting those peanuts that exceeded the quota into a lower value processing market for oil and meal or to be exported. At the time the quota system ceased there were roughly 70,000 quota owners operating 9,000 peanut farms. Quota owners received buyout payments, either in the form of annual payments over a four-year period or as a lump sum payment. The 2002 act changed the long-standing federal program for peanuts. It gave peanut producers the same familiar subsidies of direct payments, marketing loans, and counter-cyclical payments that are available to producers of grain, oilseed and cotton. Direct payments are paid to producers based on historical production and are linked to current prices or output only indirectly. Counter-cyclical payments use a basis of previous production dependant upon national prices and marketing loan benefits rely on federal compensation in response to low market prices. Marketing loan benefits are available when the price of peanuts is below the legislated U.S. loan rates. Eligibility for 1
  • 2. both the direct payments and the counter-cyclical payments restrict crops eligible for base acres. The new government loan rate for peanuts established by the 2002 act is 17.75 cents per pound. In years where peanut prices are low, counter cyclical payments and marketing loan payments are more substantial (Economic Research Service (ERS) 2005). In 2004, government payments from the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) for peanuts were valued at $259 million, or roughly 2 percent of the $10.6 billion in total CCC outlays for the year. In addition, the peanut sector also received monetary support for peanut storage and handling fees. Government payments account for roughly 30 percent of cash receipts from peanut production (Dohlman and Livezey). Demand Peanuts have been marketed as a cheap source of protein compared to cheese and red meat and as a good source of essential vitamins and minerals. With decreasing prices and increasing production of peanuts, U.S. demand for peanuts has remained strong over the last decade and a half, estimated at 6.3 pounds per capita in 2003 (ERS). This is lower than the 1989 high of 7 pounds per capita, although per capita consumption has remained relatively stable since the mid 1990s. The majority of consumption in the United States is attributed to peanuts used as a food source, as opposed to oil or meal, and peanut butter has been and remains the largest source of consumption on a per pound basis. Per capita consumption of peanut butter has remained stable since the mid 1990s following a peak in consumption at 3.6 pounds per capita in 1989. In 2003, peanut butter consumption was estimated to be 3.1 pounds per capita, or just under half of total peanut consumption. Peanuts consumed as snacks and in candy are also popular forms of consumption, with consumption per capita in 2003 at 1.3 and 1.4 pounds respectively (Figure 1). Exports The United States is a net exporter of peanuts, and in 2004 exports totaled $223 million, surpassing imports by roughly $100 million. However, exports have followed a generally decreasing trend, although with some variability, over the last decade. The percentage of total production exported has also decreased, from just over 25 percent in 1986 to 13 percent in 2004 (Figure 2). For the United States, the largest export market for peanut products is Canada, receiving 35 percent of the U.S. peanut export value in 2004, followed by the Netherlands with 16 percent, Mexico 10 percent, and the United Kingdom with 8 percent (Figure 3). Worldwide, China the largest exporter of peanuts followed by Argentina and the United States (Figure 4). The U.S. reputation for high- quality products has enabled exports to countries in the EU and others, but phytosanitary requirements and aflotoxin contamination have become increasingly contentious issues in world peanut trade. Imports In 2004, the United States imported nearly $114 million worth of peanuts and peanut products. The total value of peanut imports over the last decade has been variable with a notable drop in 2003, following the last year of the marketing quota system, and a dramatic increase in 2004, due almost entirely to an increase in imports of peanut oil (Figure 5). A lower supply of peanut oil coupled with higher prices for soybean oil (considered a peanut oil substitute) created a shortage in supply, which helps explain the 2
  • 3. significant rise in peanut oil imports (ERS 2005 Yearbook). In 1995 crude peanut oil had made up just 4 percent of imports and peanut butter 37 percent. But ten years later crude peanut oil made up 67 percent of total imports and the share of peanut butter had fallen to 22 percent. India supplied three-quarters of U.S. crude peanut oil imports in 2004, valued at $58 million, after not having shipped any peanut oil to the United States a decade previous. This increase made India the leading supplier of peanuts to the United States, followed by Canada, Argentina, and Mexico. Argentina’s exports to the United States fell steeply in 2003 following a reduction in exports of raw shelled peanuts, from $30 million in 2002 to essentially zero by 2004. Canada was the second largest exporting country to the United States in 2004 and U.S. imports from Canada have remained relatively stable at around $25 million in recent years. Mexico rounds out the top four exporting countries to the United States (Figure 5). As part of the GATT 1994 Uruguay Round Agreement a U.S. tariff-rate quota was established for peanuts, allowing a greater amount of imports to enter the United States and, under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Mexican peanut imports to the U.S. will be tariff free by 2008. Supply According to USDA’s Foreign Agricultural Service, China is by far the largest producer of peanuts, with more than double the production of India, the world’s second largest peanut producer. The United States is ranked third in terms of world production followed by Argentina and Vietnam (FASb). Since the 2002 Farm Bill and the elimination of the quota system, the most efficient U.S. producers have been able to expand production while less efficient producers have decreased production or opted out of peanut production all together. In addition, producers are now free to move to regions where they are more likely to recover better yields (Dohlman and Livezey). Total U.S. peanut production has varied around 4 billion pounds, ranging from a high of 4.9 billion in 1992 to lows of around 3.3 billion in 1984, 2001, and again in 2003. In 2004 production reached 4.1 billion pounds (Figure 6). In 2003, yields reached their highest values ever at 3,159 pounds per acre, likely the result of good weather and increased efficiency (Figure 7). Harvested acreage has decreased from a peak of 2.1 million acres in 1991 to about 1.4 million acres in 2004. Georgia is the leading peanut producer in the United States, followed by Texas (Figure 8). While total U.S. harvested acreage has not varied considerably since 1996, there has been an increasing amount of divergence of harvested acreage between states in the last 2 years as Texas acreage has decreased and Georgia’s increased. In 2002, Georgia accounted for 39.1 percent and Texas 21.7 percent of harvested acreage. In 2004, Georgia increased this percentage to 43.8 percent of total harvested acreage in the nation, while harvested acreage in Texas decreased to 16.9 percent. In nominal terms, the peak value of production occurred in 1991 when it reached $1.4 billion (Figure 9). The total value of U.S. peanut production declined to about $834 3
  • 4. million in 2004. This ranks peanuts as the third most important oilseed crop in value terms behind soybeans, which were worth $16.1 billion in 2004 and cottonseed worth $874 million. Prices Prices for peanuts have fallen since 1980, with significant decreases seen in the year preceding and following the 2002 farm bill. U.S. peanut prices (in year-2000 inflation- adjusted dollars) fell from 27 cents per pound in 2000, to 18 cents per pound in 2002. However, since the switch to a loan rate system prices have not fallen below the 17.75 cents per pound loan rate, remaining relatively stable throughout 2003 and 2004. In 2004 peanuts were valued at 18 cents per pound (Figure 10). Sources American Peanut Council. Dataweb. Available at : http://www.peanutsusa.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.page&pid=12 Dohlman, Eric and Janet Livezey. 2005. “Peanut Backgrounder. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (ERS). Report Number OC-05i-01. Available at: www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/OCS/Oct05/OCS05I01/ Phillips, Samuel. The Incredible Peanut Ethnobotanical Leaflet. Southern Illinois University Herbarium. Available at: http://www.siiu.edu/~ebl/leaflets/peanut.htm United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (ERS). 2004. Oil Crops Yearbook, March 2005. Available at: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/erssor/field/ocs-bby/ocs2005.pdf _____(2005). CCC Net Outlays by Commodity and Function, Table 35. 2005. Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/agoutlook/aotables/2005/12dec/aotab35.xls _____Food Consumption (per capita) Data System. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/foodconsumption/FoodAvailQueriable.aspx United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS). Trade Database. Available at: http://www.fas.usda.gov/ustrade/ _____(b). Production, Supply, and Distribution Database. Available at: http://www.fas.usda.gov/psd/complete_files/default.asp Virginia-Carolina Peanut Promotions. A Short Peanut History. Available at: http://www..aboutpeanuts.com/infohis.html 4
  • 5. FIGURES Figure 1: U.S. Per Capita Peanut Consumption, 1985-2003 Pounds 8 Total 6 4 Peanut Butter 2 Candy Snack 0 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Per Capita Data System Figure 2: Share of U.S. Peanut Production Exported, 1984-2004 Percent 30% 25.4% 25% 20% 15% 12.5% 10% 5% 0% 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Oil Crops Yearbook 5
  • 6. Figure 3: Leading U.S. Peanut Export Markets (Raw, Oil, and Butter), 1995-2004 Dollars (million) 350 All Countries Canada Netherlands Mexico United Kingdom 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Source: USDA Foreign Agricultural Service Figure 4. Top Five World Producers and Exporters of Peanuts, 2004 Metric Tons (1,000) 16,000 14,000 12,000 Production 10,000 Exports 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 India Vietnam United States Argentina China Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Supply, Production, and Demand Data 6
  • 7. Figure 5: U.S. Peanut Imports, All Countries and by Country Source, 1990-2004 Dollars (million) 150 All Countries India Canada Argentina Mexico 125 100 75 50 25 0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 Source: USDA Foreign Agricultural Service Figure 6: U.S. Peanut Production, 1984-2004 Pounds (billion) 6 4.9 billion pounds 5 4 3 3.3 billion pounds 2 1 0 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Oil Crops Yearbook 7
  • 8. Figure 7: U.S. Peanut Yields Per Harvested Acre, 1980-2004 Pounds per Acre 3,300 3,159 pounds 3,000 2,700 2,400 2,100 1,985 pounds 1,800 1,500 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Oil Crops Yearbook Figure 8: U.S. Harvested Peanut Acreage, 1980-2004 Acres (million) 2.4 U.S. 2.0 1.6 1.2 Georgia 0.8 0.4 Texas 0.0 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Oil Crops Yearbook 8
  • 9. Figure 9: U.S. Value of Peanut Production, 1980-2004 Dollars (billion) 2.0 $1.39 billion 1.5 1.0 0.5 $600 million 0.0 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Oil Crops Yearbook Figure 10: U.S. Peanut Prices (year-2000 inflation-adjusted dollars), 1985-2004 Dollars per pound 0.50 $0.43 0.40 0.30 0.20 $0.18 0.10 0.00 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Oil Crops Yearbook 9