Policy directions to 2050

W
Policy Directions to 2050 DEDICATED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE Energy & Climate Change
This presentation . . . .  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Our energy system Oil   Biomass  Gas  Coal  Nuclear  Renewables Primary Energy Liquids Direct combustion Industry and Manufacturing Mobility Final Energy Consumer Choices Energy Energy Energy Buildings Power Generation
Energy Development Challenges Primary Energy, EJ  200 0 400 2000 1920 -1930’s New renewables such as wind and solar Coal economy 600 The transition is uncertain Development of oil, gas and large-scale hydro, introduction of nuclear. Non-OECD OECD 2050 High Low
High and low carbon pathways 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 2000 2010 2020 2040 2050 Global Carbon Emissions, GT 2030 2002 IEA reported fossil emissions plus correction for unsustainable biomass & deforestation. WRE 450 (IPCC) WRE 550 (IPCC) WRE 1000 (IPCC) Theoretical carbon emissions profiles published in IPCC 3 rd  Assessment Report
High and low carbon pathways 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 2000 2010 2020 2040 2050 Global Carbon Emissions, GT 2030 WRE 450 (IPCC) WRE 550 (IPCC) WRE 1000 (IPCC) Theoretical carbon emissions profiles published in IPCC 3 rd  Assessment Report 2002 IEA reported fossil emissions plus correction for unsustainable biomass & deforestation. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Options for change A further shift to natural gas Nuclear power Renewables Bio-products Carbon capture and storage Mass transportation Road transport Buildings Low energy appliances Doing things differently Energy conservation and efficiency Emission reduction
Milestones – what to achieve by 2025 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],By 2025 we must be well on the way, with technologies proven and energy policy aligned with the objective. For example, we need to have:
Energy for Britain – Today to 2050 An illustration of the infrastructure changes needed as Britain reduces its CO 2  footprint by up to 60% over the first half of this century.
Policy Directions to 2050 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Policy Directions to 2050 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Technology development and deployment Number of installations / Products Technology cost Future policy must focus on both the  development  of new technology and the rapid  deployment  of the both new and existing technology Early development phase may need direct assistance Competing technology More cost competitive Earlier deployment Purchase incentives and/or CO 2  price Purchase incentives and/or the CO 2  market drive(s) early deployment
Opportunity starts at the national / sectoral level A. Opportunity Wedges (National) (Developed Country Example) National CO 2  trajectory CO 2  Emissions, MT per annum B. National/Sectoral Goals & Targets Efficiency Buildings Industry xx % p.a.  Domestic through to 20xx Power Renewables xx MW p.a. by 20xx Generation CCS xx tonnes CO 2  p.a. Mobility Bio-fuels xx litres p.a. by 20xx Efficiency xx mpg by 20xx Choice Hybrid / Diesel uptake Mass transit C. National Policies Buildings  – adopt new country building standards, design awareness Industry  – Sectoral agreements, emissions trading, technology standards Domestic  – carbon labeling, increased product standards (e.g. standby energy) Renewable Energy  – renewables targets. CCS  – funding for infrastructure, tax cuts on capital investments, price signals for carbon via emissions trading Biofuels  – targets, support for manufacturing, CO 2  labeling Vehicle Efficiency  - support technology, incentives, sectoral agreements Mobility Choice  - consumer incentives, promote public/private partnerships for transport networks
The development of energy policy ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],A future framework must recognise the sovereign nature of energy policy decisions, but at the same time provide clarity, context and drive for such decisions.
A future framework – What is needed? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],* All GHGs but as CO 2  equivalent
Clean development partnerships & programs  Clean development partnerships and technology programs based on standards and benchmarking can drive new technology development.
Managing new technology risks ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
GHG markets are expanding globally 2000  2005  2010  2015  2020  2025 Pre-Kyoto  Kyoto Linkage framework is implemented Linkages develop between all systems and more systems appear Danish-ETS UK-ETS California vehicle CO 2  & ETS Australian states ETS Canadian LFE-ETS EU-ETS CDM CDM evolves to includes sectors Expanding EU-ETS US NE-States ETS Japan technology standards
CO2 targets and trading at national level Opportunity Wedges (National) (Developed Country Example) National CO 2  trajectory At the national level: CO 2  Emissions, MT per annum 2005 2050 Trajectory for 2013 to 2018 for international allocation purposes.
CO2 targets and trading derived from sectors Opportunity Wedges (National) (Developed Country Example) National CO 2  trajectory Or at the sector level only: CO 2  Emissions, MT per annum 2005 2050 Power sector CO 2  trajectory Renewables CCS Trajectory for 2013 to 2018 for international allocation purposes.
Progressive Build-Up from National Programs 12 10 8 6 4 2 2010  2020  2030  2040  2050 Carbon Emissions, GT per annum The long term goal A   global   GHG   market   remains   an   important   goal   of   the   revised   international   framework.   But   it   is   constructed   bottom-up   through   a   linkage   framework,   rather   than   a   “big-bang”   creation   from   the   top. Emissions, tonnes CO 2 Economy wide emissions Business as usual profile Net emissions Economy wide ETS Emissions, tonnes CO 2  per tonne of cement  Cement industry Business as usual profile Energy efficiency Structured multi-national cement sectoral initiative. Best available technology Emissions, tonnes CO 2 Power generation emissions Business as usual profile Renewables / CCS wedge Net emissions Emissions, tonnes CO 2 Transport emissions Business as usual profile Bio-fuel wedge Net emissions Progressive build-up from national programs
Agenda Framework Comparison Kyoto – 2008-2012   WBCSD Revised Framework Top down reduction obligations Bottom-up – National / sector policies and commitments   Short term (5 year) compliance obligation Longer term (50 year emissions trajectory)   Allocation of a reduction obligation – equitable allocation difficult to achieve politically National opportunities and policies aligned with energy security and climate change priorities   Least cost compliance – not enough certainty for large investments in new technologies Technology development and deployment focus   Emissions market   Deeper engagement of capital markets and greater influence over allocation of capital driven by a wide range of policies and a broad based emissions market. Targets –tons reduced relative to a baseline   Targets still in terms of carbon reductions – but aligned to specific actions with GHG benefits – e.g. XX MW of wind power by 20XX.
Five “Megatrends” in our energy system Oil   Biomass  Gas  Coal  Nuclear  Renewables Primary Energy Liquids Direct combustion Industry and Manufacturing Mobility Final Energy Consumer Choices Energy Energy Energy Buildings Power Generation
Power Generation – Growing in importance 2002 2025 2050 350 EJ 300 250 200 150 100 50 Power Generation – Growing In Importance
Agenda ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Power Generation – What is needed?
Power Generation – How could it work ? Number of installations / Products Technology cost Competing technology ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Industry & Manufacturing 2002 2025 2050 Carbon emissions  in 2002, GtC ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Industry and Manufacturing 1.11 GtC 1.51 GtC 94 EJ 171 EJ Carbon emissions  in 2050, GtC Energy Use in 2002, EJ Energy Use in 2050, EJ
Agenda ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Industry and Manufacturing – What is needed? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Number of installations / Products Technology cost Competing technology Industry and Manufacturing – How could it work? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Mobility – Doing much more with less 2002 2025 2050 100 EJ 80 60 40 20 0  5  10  15  20  25  trillion-kms 13.9 0  5  10  15  20  25  trillion-kms 22.5 0  5  10  15  20  25  trillion-kms 28 Mobility – Doing Much More with Less
Agenda ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Mobility – What is needed? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Number of installations / Products Technology cost Competing technology Mobility – How could it work? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Buildings Carbon emissions  in 2050, GtC Energy Use in 2002, EJ Energy Use in 2050, EJ Carbon emissions  in 2002, GtC 2002 2025 2050 Rising living standards Growing service sector Information economy Rural to urban living Radical design Placement Efficient appliances New materials In-situ energy generation Buildings 0.78 GtC 0.75 GtC 104 EJ 237 EJ
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Buildings – What is needed?
Number of installations / Products Technology cost Competing technology Buildings – How could it work? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
  Tonnes  Carbon   p.a. A family of four: Large detached house 2.57 + Extra air-conditioning  0.04 + Heated swimming pool  1.48 But could install: Insulation & double glazing   -0.9 Efficient lighting   -0.13 Solar heating & electricity   -0.34 And could also: Use A* appliances   -0.16 Adjust the thermostat   -0.18 Switch off lights   -0.31 Drives two cars: A large SUV, 15,000 miles 1.42 A regular sedan, 10,000 miles 0.78 And travels by air regularly: ~15 short-haul trips 0.73 ~ 8 long-haul trips 2.38 Also produces waste 0.25 But could recycle some   -0.15   9.65 tonnes p.a . Source: www.bp.com/carbonfootprint   Tonnes  Carbon   p.a. A family of four: Semi-detached house    1.57 And has installed: Insulation & double glazing -0.22 Efficient lighting -0.09 Solar heating & electricity -0.26 A ground-sourced heat pump -0.59 And also: Uses A* appliances -0.11 Adjusts the thermostat -0.04 Switches off lights/appliances -0.06 Drives one car: A hybrid, 5,000 miles   0.23 And makes extensive use of alternative transport Travels regionally by air on vacation: ~8 short-haul trips   0.32 Also produces waste   0.25 but recycles where possible  -0.15   0.85 tonnes p.a . Consumer choice
Agenda Consumer choice – what is needed? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Policy Directions to 2050 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
1 de 38

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente(20)

Policies And TechnologiesPolicies And Technologies
Policies And Technologies
David Hone501 vistas
Gdmp model workshop   3 - scenariosGdmp model workshop   3 - scenarios
Gdmp model workshop 3 - scenarios
Indonesia Infrastructure Initiative423 vistas
CCXG Forum, September 2021, Timur GulCCXG Forum, September 2021, Timur Gul
CCXG Forum, September 2021, Timur Gul
OECD Environment81 vistas
Tracking Clean Energy Progress Report Tracking Clean Energy Progress Report
Tracking Clean Energy Progress Report
International Energy Agency18.8K vistas

Destacado(18)

Climate services and decarbonisationClimate services and decarbonisation
Climate services and decarbonisation
European Commission - Executive Agency for SMEs (EASME)1.4K vistas
EU Energy Policy Strategy: Towards a Low-Carbon EconomyEU Energy Policy Strategy: Towards a Low-Carbon Economy
EU Energy Policy Strategy: Towards a Low-Carbon Economy
Climate Action Network South Asia 1.7K vistas
Vision2050 kievVision2050 kiev
Vision2050 kiev
csrcentre1.1K vistas
Renovation Tracks for Europe up to 2050Renovation Tracks for Europe up to 2050
Renovation Tracks for Europe up to 2050
Leonardo ENERGY1.2K vistas
Work Log Pics #2Work Log Pics #2
Work Log Pics #2
aw10457273 vistas
Post Carbon CitiesPost Carbon Cities
Post Carbon Cities
UNDP Eurasia805 vistas
WWF Italia : Obiettivo 2050 WWF Italia : Obiettivo 2050
WWF Italia : Obiettivo 2050
WWF ITALIA710 vistas
Roadmap 2050 - A practical guide to a prosperous, low-carbon EuropeRoadmap 2050 - A practical guide to a prosperous, low-carbon Europe
Roadmap 2050 - A practical guide to a prosperous, low-carbon Europe
Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland795 vistas
Strategia energetica nazionaleStrategia energetica nazionale
Strategia energetica nazionale
Edison S.p.A.987 vistas
Low Carbon City - Giorgia RambelliLow Carbon City - Giorgia Rambelli
Low Carbon City - Giorgia Rambelli
Mayors in Action 3rd Centralized Training1K vistas
Post Carbon Institute Addresses a Changing Energy FuturePost Carbon Institute Addresses a Changing Energy Future
Post Carbon Institute Addresses a Changing Energy Future
Bill Ryerson (Immigration)167 vistas
Six Foundations for Building Community ResilienceSix Foundations for Building Community Resilience
Six Foundations for Building Community Resilience
Post Carbon Institute488 vistas
POCACITO - IntroPOCACITO - Intro
POCACITO - Intro
UNDPhr875 vistas

Similar a Policy directions to 2050(20)

David Hone at Sustentavel 2011David Hone at Sustentavel 2011
David Hone at Sustentavel 2011
David Hone605 vistas
01_Day_1_Oxburgh01_Day_1_Oxburgh
01_Day_1_Oxburgh
guest66dc5f288 vistas
Bjorn Stigson's V100 PresentationBjorn Stigson's V100 Presentation
Bjorn Stigson's V100 Presentation
Venture Publishing603 vistas
Sgcp13mackenzieSgcp13mackenzie
Sgcp13mackenzie
Justin Hayward265 vistas
Energy benoit hood(iea) ccxg gf sep2014Energy benoit hood(iea) ccxg gf sep2014
Energy benoit hood(iea) ccxg gf sep2014
OECD Environment540 vistas
Emissions Trading - More DetailEmissions Trading - More Detail
Emissions Trading - More Detail
David Hone648 vistas
Wood Mackenzie Energy Transition Outlook 2023Wood Mackenzie Energy Transition Outlook 2023
Wood Mackenzie Energy Transition Outlook 2023
Energy for One World360 vistas
Nobuo Tanaka, IEA: Cost-Effective Carbon ReductionNobuo Tanaka, IEA: Cost-Effective Carbon Reduction
Nobuo Tanaka, IEA: Cost-Effective Carbon Reduction
Alliance To Save Energy364 vistas

Último(20)

Green Leaf Consulting: Capabilities DeckGreen Leaf Consulting: Capabilities Deck
Green Leaf Consulting: Capabilities Deck
GreenLeafConsulting177 vistas
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING OPTIMAL LOAD FOR WHICH THE YIELD IS MAXIMUM ...METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING OPTIMAL LOAD FOR WHICH THE YIELD IS MAXIMUM ...
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING OPTIMAL LOAD FOR WHICH THE YIELD IS MAXIMUM ...
Prity Khastgir IPR Strategic India Patent Attorney Amplify Innovation24 vistas
[2023] Putting the R! in R&D.pdf[2023] Putting the R! in R&D.pdf
[2023] Putting the R! in R&D.pdf
Eleanor McHugh36 vistas

Policy directions to 2050

  • 1. Policy Directions to 2050 DEDICATED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE Energy & Climate Change
  • 2.
  • 3. Our energy system Oil Biomass Gas Coal Nuclear Renewables Primary Energy Liquids Direct combustion Industry and Manufacturing Mobility Final Energy Consumer Choices Energy Energy Energy Buildings Power Generation
  • 4. Energy Development Challenges Primary Energy, EJ 200 0 400 2000 1920 -1930’s New renewables such as wind and solar Coal economy 600 The transition is uncertain Development of oil, gas and large-scale hydro, introduction of nuclear. Non-OECD OECD 2050 High Low
  • 5. High and low carbon pathways 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 2000 2010 2020 2040 2050 Global Carbon Emissions, GT 2030 2002 IEA reported fossil emissions plus correction for unsustainable biomass & deforestation. WRE 450 (IPCC) WRE 550 (IPCC) WRE 1000 (IPCC) Theoretical carbon emissions profiles published in IPCC 3 rd Assessment Report
  • 6.
  • 7. Options for change A further shift to natural gas Nuclear power Renewables Bio-products Carbon capture and storage Mass transportation Road transport Buildings Low energy appliances Doing things differently Energy conservation and efficiency Emission reduction
  • 8.
  • 9. Energy for Britain – Today to 2050 An illustration of the infrastructure changes needed as Britain reduces its CO 2 footprint by up to 60% over the first half of this century.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12. Technology development and deployment Number of installations / Products Technology cost Future policy must focus on both the development of new technology and the rapid deployment of the both new and existing technology Early development phase may need direct assistance Competing technology More cost competitive Earlier deployment Purchase incentives and/or CO 2 price Purchase incentives and/or the CO 2 market drive(s) early deployment
  • 13. Opportunity starts at the national / sectoral level A. Opportunity Wedges (National) (Developed Country Example) National CO 2 trajectory CO 2 Emissions, MT per annum B. National/Sectoral Goals & Targets Efficiency Buildings Industry xx % p.a. Domestic through to 20xx Power Renewables xx MW p.a. by 20xx Generation CCS xx tonnes CO 2 p.a. Mobility Bio-fuels xx litres p.a. by 20xx Efficiency xx mpg by 20xx Choice Hybrid / Diesel uptake Mass transit C. National Policies Buildings – adopt new country building standards, design awareness Industry – Sectoral agreements, emissions trading, technology standards Domestic – carbon labeling, increased product standards (e.g. standby energy) Renewable Energy – renewables targets. CCS – funding for infrastructure, tax cuts on capital investments, price signals for carbon via emissions trading Biofuels – targets, support for manufacturing, CO 2 labeling Vehicle Efficiency - support technology, incentives, sectoral agreements Mobility Choice - consumer incentives, promote public/private partnerships for transport networks
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16. Clean development partnerships & programs Clean development partnerships and technology programs based on standards and benchmarking can drive new technology development.
  • 17.
  • 18. GHG markets are expanding globally 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 Pre-Kyoto Kyoto Linkage framework is implemented Linkages develop between all systems and more systems appear Danish-ETS UK-ETS California vehicle CO 2 & ETS Australian states ETS Canadian LFE-ETS EU-ETS CDM CDM evolves to includes sectors Expanding EU-ETS US NE-States ETS Japan technology standards
  • 19. CO2 targets and trading at national level Opportunity Wedges (National) (Developed Country Example) National CO 2 trajectory At the national level: CO 2 Emissions, MT per annum 2005 2050 Trajectory for 2013 to 2018 for international allocation purposes.
  • 20. CO2 targets and trading derived from sectors Opportunity Wedges (National) (Developed Country Example) National CO 2 trajectory Or at the sector level only: CO 2 Emissions, MT per annum 2005 2050 Power sector CO 2 trajectory Renewables CCS Trajectory for 2013 to 2018 for international allocation purposes.
  • 21. Progressive Build-Up from National Programs 12 10 8 6 4 2 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Carbon Emissions, GT per annum The long term goal A global GHG market remains an important goal of the revised international framework. But it is constructed bottom-up through a linkage framework, rather than a “big-bang” creation from the top. Emissions, tonnes CO 2 Economy wide emissions Business as usual profile Net emissions Economy wide ETS Emissions, tonnes CO 2 per tonne of cement Cement industry Business as usual profile Energy efficiency Structured multi-national cement sectoral initiative. Best available technology Emissions, tonnes CO 2 Power generation emissions Business as usual profile Renewables / CCS wedge Net emissions Emissions, tonnes CO 2 Transport emissions Business as usual profile Bio-fuel wedge Net emissions Progressive build-up from national programs
  • 22. Agenda Framework Comparison Kyoto – 2008-2012 WBCSD Revised Framework Top down reduction obligations Bottom-up – National / sector policies and commitments Short term (5 year) compliance obligation Longer term (50 year emissions trajectory) Allocation of a reduction obligation – equitable allocation difficult to achieve politically National opportunities and policies aligned with energy security and climate change priorities Least cost compliance – not enough certainty for large investments in new technologies Technology development and deployment focus Emissions market Deeper engagement of capital markets and greater influence over allocation of capital driven by a wide range of policies and a broad based emissions market. Targets –tons reduced relative to a baseline Targets still in terms of carbon reductions – but aligned to specific actions with GHG benefits – e.g. XX MW of wind power by 20XX.
  • 23. Five “Megatrends” in our energy system Oil Biomass Gas Coal Nuclear Renewables Primary Energy Liquids Direct combustion Industry and Manufacturing Mobility Final Energy Consumer Choices Energy Energy Energy Buildings Power Generation
  • 24. Power Generation – Growing in importance 2002 2025 2050 350 EJ 300 250 200 150 100 50 Power Generation – Growing In Importance
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30. Mobility – Doing much more with less 2002 2025 2050 100 EJ 80 60 40 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 trillion-kms 13.9 0 5 10 15 20 25 trillion-kms 22.5 0 5 10 15 20 25 trillion-kms 28 Mobility – Doing Much More with Less
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33. Buildings Carbon emissions in 2050, GtC Energy Use in 2002, EJ Energy Use in 2050, EJ Carbon emissions in 2002, GtC 2002 2025 2050 Rising living standards Growing service sector Information economy Rural to urban living Radical design Placement Efficient appliances New materials In-situ energy generation Buildings 0.78 GtC 0.75 GtC 104 EJ 237 EJ
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36. Tonnes Carbon p.a. A family of four: Large detached house 2.57 + Extra air-conditioning 0.04 + Heated swimming pool 1.48 But could install: Insulation & double glazing -0.9 Efficient lighting -0.13 Solar heating & electricity -0.34 And could also: Use A* appliances -0.16 Adjust the thermostat -0.18 Switch off lights -0.31 Drives two cars: A large SUV, 15,000 miles 1.42 A regular sedan, 10,000 miles 0.78 And travels by air regularly: ~15 short-haul trips 0.73 ~ 8 long-haul trips 2.38 Also produces waste 0.25 But could recycle some -0.15 9.65 tonnes p.a . Source: www.bp.com/carbonfootprint Tonnes Carbon p.a. A family of four: Semi-detached house 1.57 And has installed: Insulation & double glazing -0.22 Efficient lighting -0.09 Solar heating & electricity -0.26 A ground-sourced heat pump -0.59 And also: Uses A* appliances -0.11 Adjusts the thermostat -0.04 Switches off lights/appliances -0.06 Drives one car: A hybrid, 5,000 miles 0.23 And makes extensive use of alternative transport Travels regionally by air on vacation: ~8 short-haul trips 0.32 Also produces waste 0.25 but recycles where possible -0.15 0.85 tonnes p.a . Consumer choice
  • 37.
  • 38.