4. The Brandt Report (1983) was published by
a commission chaired by the former German
Chancellor Willy Brandt. The report identified:
2. THE SOUTH – is a
geographical convenience
based on the fact that
most of the Poor World lies
south of latitude 30 degree
North. (Except Australia
and New Zealand).
1.THE NORTH –
are those countries
that are above the
South 30 degree
North.
6. The Global North (comprises one quarter of the
world population) refers to developed societies of
Europe and North America, which are characterised
by established democracy, wealth, technological
advancement, political stability, aging population,
zero population growth and dominance of world
trade and politics.
7. The Global South (are the developing countries)
(comprises three quarters of the world population)
represents mainly agrarian economies in Africa,
India, China, Latin America and others that are not
as economically sound and politically stable as their
global North counterparts and tend to be
characterised by turmoil, war, conflict, poverty,
anarchy and tyranny (Odeh, 2010).
9. The terms the North and the South, when
used in a global context, are alternative
designations for “developed” and “developing”
countries.
The North–South divide is broadly considered a
socio-economic and political divide.
The Global North refers to the First World
Countries or Developed Countries.
The Global South refers to the Third World
Countries or the Developing Countries.
10. Characteristics of the North Characteristics of the South
1/4 of the world's people 3/4 of the world's people
4/5 of world's income 1/5 of world's income
Average life expectancy more than 70 years Average life expectancy of 50 years
Most people have enough to eat 1/5 or more suffer from hunger and malnutrition
Most people are educated 1/2 of the people have little chance of any education
Over 90% of the world's manufacturing industry less than 10% of the world's manufacturing industry
About 96% of the world's spending on research and
development
4% of the world's research and development
12. The globalized world faces two
contradictory trends. While a
globalized market opens the
prospects of unimagined wealth, it
also creates new vulnerabilities to
political turmoil and the danger of a
new gap.
13. The impact of these new trends on the
developing world is profound.
In economies driven by a near imperative
for the big to acquire the small,
companies of developing countries are
increasingly being absorbed by American
and European multinationals.
14. While this solves the problem of
access to capital, it brings about
growing vulnerabilities to domestic
political tensions, especially in times of
crisis. And within the developing
countries, it creates political
temptations for attacks on the entire
system of globalization.
15. The typical developing country’s economy
bifurcates: one set of enterprises is
integrated into the global economy,
mostly owned by international
corporations.
The rest, cut off from globalization, employs
much of the labor force at the lowest wages
and with the bleakest social prospects. In
17. The North-South Divide is criticized for being a
way of segregating people along economic
lines and is seen as a factor of the widening
gap between developed and developing
economies.
However, several measures have been put in
place to contract the North-South Divide
including the lobbying for international free
trade and globalization.
18. The United Nations has developed a
program dedicated to narrowing the
divide through its Millennium
Development Goals.
This includes improving education and
health care, promoting gender equality,
and ensuring environmental
sustainability.
Notas del editor
The origin of dividing countries into the North-South Divide arose during the Cold War of the mid 20th century.
During this time, countries were primarily categorized according to their alignment between the Russian East and the American West.
Countries in the East like the Soviet Union and China which became classified as Second World countries.
In the west, the United States and its allies were labelled as First World countries.
This division left out many countries which were poorer than the First World and Second World countries.
The poor countries were eventually labeled as Third World countries.
This categorization was later abandoned after the Second World countries joined the First World countries.
New criteria was established to categorize countries which was named the North-South Divide where First World countries were known as the North while Third World countries comprised the South.
Let’s have a simple analogy in order to understand easily the North-South Divide. Look at these pictures.
The cheetah is the fastest animal on earth, whereas the snail is the slowest animal on earth.
The cheetah represents the Global North because its strength, speed and might and being the fastest.
And the snail represents the Global South because it’s very slow in progress and development.
That is the primary distinction between the two.
Now, let us go deeper as to how and when the Global North and Global South division started?
To fully understand, let’s check on the next picture.
The Brandt Line was developed as a way of showing how the world was geographically split into relatively richer and poorer nations.
Richer countries are almost all located in the Northern Hemisphere, Poorer countries are mostly located in tropical regions and in the Southern Hemisphere.
The North-South Divide is clearly a socio-economic and political categorization of countries.
The Cold-War-era generalization places countries in two distinct groups; The North and the South.
The North is comprised of all First World countries and most Second World countries while the South is comprised of Third World countries.
This categorization ignores the geographic position of countries with some countries in the southern hemisphere such as Australia and New Zealand being labeled as part of the North.
Hence in the NORTH:
Less population
High Wealth
High Standard of living
High Industrial development
More of industry
While in SOUTH:
Large population
Low Wealth
Low Standard of living
Low Industrial development
More on Agriculture