Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...
Wikipedia's Open Door and Closed Window
1. Wikipedia’s Open Door
and Closed Window:
Why People Join Wikipedia, Why They Leave, Whether it
Matters and What (if Anything) to Do About It
William Beutler • January 13, 2010
#WikiWars • Bangalore, India
3. Who Reads Wikipedia?
• People who want to know things and have
an internet connection
• That is to say, almost everyone
• For all its ubiquity, Wikipedia literacy is very
low
• Talk pages? Warning tags? Huh?
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
4. Who Edits Wikipedia?
• Very, very, very few people
• Per Jimbo:
• 50% of all edits performed by 0.7% of all
editors (524 people)
• 73% of all edits performed by 2% of all
editors (1400 people)
• Per Aaron Swartz:
• Yet the most active don’t always write
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
5. 80-20 Rule? Forget That
50% by
0.7%
73% by 2
The rest
Edits Editors
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
6. Why Do People Quit Wikipedia?
• Better question: Why do people join
Wikipedia?
• Very few contribute in the first place
• Who says anyone is supposed to be
continuously active in the first place?
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
7. What Wikipedia Really Is
• The misleading PR speak:
the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit.
• The official language:
a neutral and unbiased compilation of
previously written, verifiable facts.
• In reality, it is:
a popular, simple and useful but unreliable, insular
and very complicated background briefing.
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
8. Wikipedia is Complicated
Approx. 50 policies, 150+ site guidelines, more
advisory essays often treated as enforceable
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
9. 1 Header: Present in every article, givesarticle’s subject in
§
and preview of the full article, with the
a thumbnail sketch
2
boldface. Should be no longer than 3 paragraphs, usually 1
does not require citations.
3
2 Infobox: Notwhere similarto every article, but May
§
recommended
appropriate
subjects do have one.
include image or not. 4
3
§ Contents: Appears automatically after creating 4 or more
subsections following the Synopsis.
§ Body: Contains one or more paragraphs describing the
4 subject, with inline citations verifying important facts.
5 References:There are multiple forms of acceptable styles
§ Proper formatting will automatically place
citations here. 5
of citation format.
6
6 External links: Links to official website if any, other
§
useful, ideally non-commercial articles.
7
§ Categories: Added to bottom of article, groups with
7 similar articles for ease of navigation and sorting.
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
10. Why Join? Stay? Leave?
• TO HAVE FUN BY CAUSING MISCHIEF
• Not banned yet / found a new IP address
— STAY
• Been there, done that, bored — LEAVE
• Banned or blocked indefinitely — LEAVE
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
11. Why Join? Stay? Leave?
• TO SEE IF IT WORKS
• Interest further piqued — STAY
• Curiosity satisfied — LEAVE
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
13. Why Join? Stay? Leave?
• TO MAKE A POINT ON BEHALF OF
ONESELF OR SOMEONE (OR
SOMETHING) ELSE
• Point made, interest piqued — STAY
• Point made, nothing more to say — LEAVE
• Point defeated — LEAVE
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
14. Why Join? Stay? Leave?
• TO SHARE / MAKE USE OF
ACCUMULATED KNOWLEDGE
• Expertise valued, continually useful — STAY
• Expertise exhausted, little more to say —
LEAVE
• Expertise rejected for stylistic / content
reasons — LEAVE
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
15. Why Join? Stay? Leave?
• TO ASSIST IN DEVELOPING THE SUM OF
ALL HUMAN KNOWLEDGE
• Contribution meaningful — STAY
• Lack of time — LEAVE
• Frustrated by vandals, trolls — LEAVE
• Disagree with direction of project — LEAVE
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
17. Raul’s Fifth Law of Wikipedia
• “Over time, contentious articles will grow
from edit-war inspiring to eventually reach
a compromise that is agreed upon by all
the editors who have ot departed in
exasperation. This equilibrium will
inevitably be disturbed by new users who
accuse the article of being absurdly one
sided and who attempt to rewrite the
entire article. This is the cyclical nature of
controversial articles."
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
23. Gone, But Not Forgotten
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
24. What Does It Mean for
Participation?
• Administrator activity Sept. ‘07—Mar. ‘09
Source: User:MBisanz @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
25. What Does It Mean for
Participation?
• Number of hours between 5 million edits
Source: User:MBisanz @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
26. Three Types of (Productive) Editors
• Original Authors of New Content
• Organizers of Existing Content
• Outside Interests Exerting Influence
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
27. Bad Influence
• Rep. Dave Albo wouldn’t take “no” for an answer
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
28. Positive Influence
• Article created by campaign voluneer with
disclosure & understanding of the rules
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
29. Let’s Get Prescriptivist
• Recognition that volunteer “spirit” of
Wikipedia is not the only model
• Assistance / engagement of expert groups,
even ones with potential Conflict of Interest
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
30. Let’s Get Prescriptivist
• Informal education — More FAQs, 101s, etc.
• Partipation by educators — WP involved in
classroom assignments, not avoided
•
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian
31. Thanks For Listening!
• See this again at: http://slideshare.net/williambeutler
• Wikipedia: User:WWB + User:NMS_Bill
• Twitter: @williambeutler • @thewikipedian
• The Wikipedian: http://thewikipedian.net
• Blog P.I.: http://blogpi.net
• E-mail: williambeutler@gmail.com
@williambeutler • @thewikipedian