Se ha denunciado esta presentación.
Utilizamos tu perfil de LinkedIn y tus datos de actividad para personalizar los anuncios y mostrarte publicidad más relevante. Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de publicidad en cualquier momento.
Altmetrics: Analyzing the value in scholarly content 
William Gunn 
Head of Academic Outreach 
william.gunn@mendeley.com 
...
Based in London & New York, Mendeley is researchers, graduates and software developers from... 
...backed by co-founders a...
...and aggregates research 
data in the cloud 
Mendeley makes science more collaborative and transparent: 
Mendeley extrac...
Instrumenting the Research Workflow 
Search 
Read 
Annotate 
Organize 
Write 
Import
Rich user profile data
300 million documents uploaded 
2.0 million users 
Cambridge 
Stanford University 
MIT 
Imperial College London 
Universit...
Why are altmetrics important? 
Get better data on what's working 
Get it faster 
Serve all the stakeholders in research
Research is poor quality 
Amgen: 47 of 53 “landmark” oncology publications could not be reproduced. 
Bayer: 43 of 67 onc...
We didn’t see that a target is more likely to be validated if it was reported in ten publications or in two publications 
...
https://secure.flickr.com/photos/fireflythegreat/2845637227/
Journal Impact Factor 
Number of citations 
Citeable items 
= 
Impact Factor
Problems with Impact Factor
Problems with Impact Factor
http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291 
Problems with Impact Factor 
“During discussion...
Research is too slow
Google Analytics for research
Google Analytics for research
Google Analytics for research
ReaderMeter.org 
Personalized Impact
Personalized Impact
We’re in this for the long haul 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/robertjosiah/4519389115
Join Mendeley for Librarians 
This is a private librarian-only group for members to share presentations and documents. Sen...
Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content
Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content
Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content
Próxima SlideShare
Cargando en…5
×

Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

  • Sé el primero en comentar

  • Sé el primero en recomendar esto

Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

  1. 1. Altmetrics: Analyzing the value in scholarly content William Gunn Head of Academic Outreach william.gunn@mendeley.com @mrgunn
  2. 2. Based in London & New York, Mendeley is researchers, graduates and software developers from... ...backed by co-founders and former executives of: Supported by:
  3. 3. ...and aggregates research data in the cloud Mendeley makes science more collaborative and transparent: Mendeley extracts research data… Collecting rich signals from domain experts.
  4. 4. Instrumenting the Research Workflow Search Read Annotate Organize Write Import
  5. 5. Rich user profile data
  6. 6. 300 million documents uploaded 2.0 million users Cambridge Stanford University MIT Imperial College London University of Oxford Harvard University University of Michigan University College London University of California at Berkeley Columbia University
  7. 7. Why are altmetrics important? Get better data on what's working Get it faster Serve all the stakeholders in research
  8. 8. Research is poor quality Amgen: 47 of 53 “landmark” oncology publications could not be reproduced. Bayer: 43 of 67 oncology & cardiovascular projects were based on contradictory results Dr. John Ioannidis: 432 publications purporting sex differences in hypertension, multiple sclerosis, or lung cancer. Only one data set was reproducible.
  9. 9. We didn’t see that a target is more likely to be validated if it was reported in ten publications or in two publications NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY 10, 712 (SEPTEMBER 2011)
  10. 10. https://secure.flickr.com/photos/fireflythegreat/2845637227/
  11. 11. Journal Impact Factor Number of citations Citeable items = Impact Factor
  12. 12. Problems with Impact Factor
  13. 13. Problems with Impact Factor
  14. 14. http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291 Problems with Impact Factor “During discussions with Thomson Scientific over which article types the company deems as “citable,” it became clear that the process of determining a journal's impact factor is unscientific and arbitrary.”
  15. 15. Research is too slow
  16. 16. Google Analytics for research
  17. 17. Google Analytics for research
  18. 18. Google Analytics for research
  19. 19. ReaderMeter.org Personalized Impact
  20. 20. Personalized Impact
  21. 21. We’re in this for the long haul http://www.flickr.com/photos/robertjosiah/4519389115
  22. 22. Join Mendeley for Librarians This is a private librarian-only group for members to share presentations and documents. Send a message to community@mendeley.com for an invitation.

×