Se ha denunciado esta presentación.
Utilizamos tu perfil de LinkedIn y tus datos de actividad para personalizar los anuncios y mostrarte publicidad más relevante. Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de publicidad en cualquier momento.
http://lawrencekok.blogspot.com
Prepared by
Lawrence Kok
Tutorial on Collision Theory, Arrhenius Equation
Maxwell Boltzman...
Collision Theory
Chemical rxn to occur bet A +B
• Molecule collide with right orientation (geometry)
( effective collision...
Effect Temp on Rate of rxn
• Area under curve proportional to number molecules
• Wide range of molecules with diff kinetic...
Fraction molecules with energy > Ea
Fraction molecules = e –Ea/RT
= e -55000/8.314 x 298
= 2.28 x10 -10
Fraction molecules...
Temp increase from 25C to 35C (10C rise)
Rate doubles (100% increase)
Collision more energetic
Kinetic Energy α Abs Temp
•...
Temp and rate constant link by Arrhenius Eqn
X + Y → Z
Rate of rxn = (Total number collision) x ( fraction collision, ener...
Decomposition of 2HI ↔ H2 + I2 at diff temp and k was measured. Find Ea
Arrhenius Eqn
Ea from its gradient
Arrhenius Eqn -...
Decomposition of Mass X at diff temp and k was measured. Find Ea
Arrhenius Eqn - Ea by graphical Method
3
1
1 lnln
RT
E
Ak...
Acknowledgements
Thanks to source of pictures and video used in this presentation
Thanks to Creative Commons for excellent...
Próxima SlideShare
Cargando en…5
×

IB Chemistry Collision Theory, Arrhenius Equation and Maxwell Boltzmann Distribution

IB Chemistry Collision Theory, Arrhenius Equation and Maxwell Boltzmann Distribution

  • Sé el primero en comentar

IB Chemistry Collision Theory, Arrhenius Equation and Maxwell Boltzmann Distribution

  1. 1. http://lawrencekok.blogspot.com Prepared by Lawrence Kok Tutorial on Collision Theory, Arrhenius Equation Maxwell Boltzmann Distribution Curve.
  2. 2. Collision Theory Chemical rxn to occur bet A +B • Molecule collide with right orientation (geometry) ( effective collision take place) • Molecule collide with total energy greater > activation energy • Effective collision will lead to product formation Collision bet A + B No product formation • Energy collision < activation energy • Collision not in correct orientation or energetic enough to overcome Ea Product formation • Energy collision > activation energy • Collision energetic enough to overcome Ea Rate of Reaction • Conc reactant increase ↑ • Freq of collision increase ↑ • Freq of effective collision increase ↑ • Temp increase ↑ by 10 C • Rate increase ↑ by 100% • Exponential relationship bet Temp and Rate Rate = k [A]1[B]1 1st order – A 1st order – B Conc A doubles x2 – Rate x2 Conc A triples x3 – Rate x3 Collision Theory • Temp increase ↑ by 10C • Fraction of molecules with energy > Ea doubles • Rate increases ↑ by 100% Ineffective collision Effective collision Concentration Temperaturedepends
  3. 3. Effect Temp on Rate of rxn • Area under curve proportional to number molecules • Wide range of molecules with diff kinetic energy at particular temp • Temp increases ↑ - curve shifted to right • Temp increases ↑ - fraction of molecules with energy > Ea increase • T2 > T1 by 10C – Area under curve for T2 = 2 X Area T1 • Y axis – fraction molecules having a given kinetic energy • X axis – kinetic energy/speed for molecule • Total area under curve for T1 and T2 same, BUT T2 is shift to right with greater proportion molecules having higher kinetic energy Ave Kinetic Energy α Abs Temp • Ave kinetic energy for all molecules at T1 lower • Fraction of molecule with energy > Ea is less ↓ • Ave kinetic energy for all molecules at T2 is higher • Fraction of molecule with energy > Ea is higher ↑ Maxwell Boltzmann Distribution -Temp affect Rate At T1 (Low Temp) At T2 (High Temp) T1 T2 RT Ea Aek   Relationship k and T - Arrhenius Eqn Rate constant Arrhenius constant • Collision freq and orientation factor Ea = Activation energy T = Abs Temp in K R = Gas constant 8.314 J K-1 mol-1 RT Ea Aek   Fraction of molecules with energy > Ea Rate constant, k increases ↑ exponentially with Temp
  4. 4. Fraction molecules with energy > Ea Fraction molecules = e –Ea/RT = e -55000/8.314 x 298 = 2.28 x10 -10 Fraction molecules with energy > Ea Fraction molecules = e –Ea/RT = e -55000/8.314 x 308 = 4.60 x 10 -10 Total number molecule with energy > Ea = Fraction molecule x total number molecule in 1 mol = 2.28 x 10-10 x 6.0 x 10 23 = 1.37 x 1014 Total number molecule with energy > Ea = Fraction molecule x total number molecule in 1 mol = 4.60 x 10-10 x 6.0 x 10 23 = 2.77 x 1014 Total number molecule with energy >E a Fraction molecules with energy > Ea = Total number of molecule in 1 mole gas Rate double (increase by 100%) when temp rise by 10C Total number molecule with energy > Ea at 35C 2.77 x 10 14 2 (Double) Total number molecule with energy > Ea at 25C 1.37 x 10 14 Rate double = area under curve double = fraction molecule under curve double Arrhenius Eqn - Rate doubles when temp rises from 25C to 35C At 35C – 308KAt 25C – 298K Convert fraction of molecules to total number of molecules in 1 mole of gas? At 35C At 25C = = Fraction of molecules with energy > EaRT Ea eAk   ..
  5. 5. Temp increase from 25C to 35C (10C rise) Rate doubles (100% increase) Collision more energetic Kinetic Energy α Abs Temp • Ave Kinetic Energy = 1/2mv2 α Temp • As Temp increase from 25C to 35C 1/2mv2 T2(35C) 1/2mv2 T1(25C) ↓ V2 2 308 √1.03 V1 2 298 ↓ V2 1.01V1 Ave speed v2 = 1.01 x Ave speed v1 Ave speed increase by only 1.6% Using Arrhenius eqn k (35C) Ae -Ea/RT k (25C) Ae -Ea/RT k (35C) e -58000/8.31 x 308 k (25C) e -58000/8.31 x 298 e -23.03 2.2 e -23.82 k (35C) = 2.2 x k (25C) Rate at 35C = 2 x Rate at 25C Rate increase by 100% Collision frequency Increase Using Ave kinetic eqn - 1/2mv2 α Temp = = = = = = = = Conclusion • Temp increase ↑ – Rate increase ↑ due to more energetic collision and NOT due to increase in freq in collision • Temp – cause more molecule having energy > Ea- lead to increase ↑ in rate • Rate increase ↑ exponentially with increase Temp ↑ • Rate double X2 for every 10C rise in Temp • Rate increase ↑ mainly due to more energetic collision (collision bet molecules more energetic, with energy > Ea
  6. 6. Temp and rate constant link by Arrhenius Eqn X + Y → Z Rate of rxn = (Total number collision) x ( fraction collision, energy >Ea) x ( [X] [Y] ) Arrhenius Constant A Fraction molecule energy > Ea e –Ea/RT Conc [X][Y] Rate of rxn = A e –Ea/RT [X][Y] Rate of rxn = k [X] [Y] If conc constant BUT Temp changes, combine eqn 1 and 2 Rate of rxn = k [X]1 [Y]1 = A e –Ea/RT [X][Y] k = A e –Ea/RT Rate rxn written in TWO forms Rate of rxn = A e –Ea/RT [X] [Y] Eqn 1 Eqn 2 Cancel both sides Rate of rxn = A e –Ea/RT [X][Y] Fraction molecule energy > Ea e –Ea/RT Conc [X][Y] Temp increase Fraction with energy > Ea increase Rate increase exponentially Conc increase Freq collision increase Rate increase Arrhenius Eqn - Ea by graphical Method RT Ea eAk   ..        TR E Ak a 1 lnln        TR E Ak a 1 303.2 lglg Plot ln k vs 1/T • Gradient = -Ea/R • ln A = intercept y axis Plot log k vs 1/T • Gradient = -Ea/R • log A = intercept y axis ln both sides log both sides ln k lg k 1/T1/T -Ea/R -Ea/R
  7. 7. Decomposition of 2HI ↔ H2 + I2 at diff temp and k was measured. Find Ea Arrhenius Eqn Ea from its gradient Arrhenius Eqn - Ea by graphical Method Temp/K 1/T k/dm3 mol-1 s-1 ln k 633 1.58 x 10-3 1.78 x 10-5 -10.94 666 1.50 x 10-3 1.07 x 10-4 -9.14 697 1.43 x 10-3 5.01 x 10-4 -7.60 715 1.40 x 10-3 1.05 x 10-5 -6.86 781 1.28 x 10-3 1.51 x 10-2 -4.19 1 RT Ea eAk   ..        TR E Ak a 1 lnln Plot ln k vs 1/T 2 ln both sides -Ea/R Gradient = -Ea/R Gradient = -2.25 x 104 -2.25 x 104 = -Ea/R Ea = 2.25 x 104 x 8.314 = 1.87 x105 Jmol-1 ln k 1/T Rxn 2HI ↔ H2 + I2 Find Ea 1 1 lnln RT E Ak a  2 2 lnln RT E Ak a  12 4 3 121 2 1066.1 600 1 650 1 314.8107.2 105.3 ln 11 ln                               kJmolE E TTR E k k a a a             121 2 11 ln TTR E k k a 600K ---k = 2.7 x 10-14 650K --- k= 3.5 x 10-3
  8. 8. Decomposition of Mass X at diff temp and k was measured. Find Ea Arrhenius Eqn - Ea by graphical Method 3 1 1 lnln RT E Ak a  2 2 lnln RT E Ak a  1 121 2 7.52 273 1 286 1 314.855.0 4.1 ln 11 ln                           kJmolE E TTR E k k a a a             121 2 11 ln TTR E k k a Time/m Mass left/g Mass loss 0 130 0 20 120 10 60 98 32 80 86 44 273K ---k = 0.55 286K ---k = 1.4 Time/m Mass left/g Mass loss 0 130 0 10 115 15 15 106 24 30 86 44 Plot mass loss vs time Gradient will give rate constant, k Mass loss 273K 286K Mass loss time time Gradient ↓ rate constant, k = 0.55 Gradient ↓ rate constant, k = 1.4
  9. 9. Acknowledgements Thanks to source of pictures and video used in this presentation Thanks to Creative Commons for excellent contribution on licenses http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Prepared by Lawrence Kok Check out more video tutorials from my site and hope you enjoy this tutorial http://lawrencekok.blogspot.com

×