SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 52
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Assessment Literacy Series
Quick Start ©

Module 2
1
“Build” Objectives
Participants will:
1. Develop items/tasks.

2. Create scoring keys and/or scoring

rubrics.
3. Construct assessment forms with

Administration Guidelines.

2
Helpful Resources
Training Material


Modularized into three (3) phases



Organized into four (4) subfolders:
•
•

Guides: Handouts, Rules of Thumb, Models, etc.

•

Templates: Forms, Spreadsheets, Calculators, etc.

•



Videos: PowerPoint Presentations, Videos, etc.

Stuff: Research, Technical Papers, Websites, etc.

Delivered via online learning platform: Homeroom

http://homeroom.ria2001.org/login.php

3
Helpful Resources (cont.)
Participants may wish to reference the following:
Guides
► Handout #2 – Building the Assessment-Examples
 Model #1 – Elementary Art Grade 5
 Model #2 – Pre-Algebra Grade 8
 Model #3 – Nutrition and Culinary, Level III (High School)
Templates
► Template #2 – Building the Assessment
Other “Stuff”
► Cognitive Demand Guide document
► Research in Action’s “Smart Book”
► Textbooks, teacher manuals, and other supplemental materials
► Performance Task Framework template
► Performance Measure Rubric
4
Build Components
Items/Tasks

BUILD

Test Forms

Scoring Keys
5
STEP 4
Items/Tasks

6
Generic Guidelines
 Develop questions and answers at the same time.
 Focus on both the content standard and its implied
cognitive demand.
 Refine by screening for bias, developmental
appropriateness, fairness, and sensitive topics.

7
Essential Guidelines


Items/tasks are considered secure even in draft form.



Adhere to copyright laws and avoid plagiarism.



Ensure that images, charts, and graphs are clear.



Use scenarios and passages that are:
• relatively short;
• developmentally appropriate; and,
• sensitive to readability.
8
Multiple Choice (MC) Guidelines:
Stem


Develop a stem (question) and answer options.



Keep the stem concise.



Ensure that vocabulary is developmentally appropriate.



Include as much of the item as possible in the stem.



Avoid irrelevant and misleading information.

9
Multiple Choice (MC) Guidelines:
Response Options


Use three (3) options for Grades K-1 and four (4) options for
Grades 2-12.



Ensure that there is only one (1) correct answer.



Make sure distractors are plausible (realistic).



Avoid “All of the above.”, “None of the above.”, and “Both A and
B are Correct.”



Present options in ascending/descending order when possible.



Keep options similar in length, sentence structure, and complexity
of thought.



Ensure that all options are grammatically consistent with the stem.
10
MC Item-Example
1.

Which river runs from north to south and
empties into the Gulf of Mexico?
Stem

A. Columbia
B. Mississippi

C. Potomac

Answer
Options
Item
Tag

D. Ohio

(0001.SOS.GR4.POST.MC-LV1-GEO2.1)
11
Item Tag Codification (optional)


Each item/task requires a unique identifier.


Tags contain information used to identify each item/task.



Item tags consist of:
• Item number
• Course/content area
• Grade-level
• Test-type

• Item-type
• Cognitive-level
• Content standard identification number
Item #

Course

Grade

Test
Type

Item
Type

DoK

Standard
ID
12

(0001.ART.GR5.POST.MC-LV2-4.1)
Procedural Steps: MC Items
Step 1.

Review the targeted content standard.

Step 2.

Determine which aspects of the standard can be
measured objectively.

Step 3.

Select the focused aspect and determine the cognitive
demand reflected in the standard’s description.

Step 4.

Create a question (stem), one (1) correct answer, and
plausible (realistic) distractors.

Step 5.

Review the item and answer options for grammatical
soundness.
13
QA Checklist: MC Items


Presents a definite, explicit, and singular question, which is worded
positively.



Contains only one (1) correct answer, with each distractor being plausible
and/or representing common misconceptions.



Consists of answer options being of similar length, structure, and format.



Places charts, tables, graphs, and/or images within the item.



Uses consistent grammar among the question (stem) and answer options.



Avoids multiple answer options, such as “All of the above.”, “None of the
above.”, and “Both A and B are correct.”



Arranges answer options in logical order when applicable, such as
numeric or chronological order.



Avoids repeating the same words or phrases in each of the answer option.
14
Constructed Response (CR)
-General Guidelines Use

developmentally appropriate language for
students.

 Make

student expectations clear.

• “Explain” vs. “Discuss”
• “Describe” vs. “Comment”
 State

the extent of the expected answer.

• “Give three reasons” vs. “Give some reasons”


Create well developed scoring criteria or a rubric
for each task.
15
CR Guidelines (cont.)
Short Answer (SA)

tasks

• Solve in one step
• Require a brief response (2-5 minutes)
• Worth up to three (3) points
Extended Answer (EA)

items/tasks
• Solve using multiple steps
• Require 5-10 minutes to answer
• Worth four (4) or more points
16
CR Guidelines (cont.)
 Extended

•
•
•
•
•

Performance (EP) Tasks
Align multiple tasks to several content
standards.
Administer over an extended time period.
Serve as a culminating event or project (e.g.,
final portfolio, performance, or project).
Require high levels of cognitive demand (e.g.,
Level 4).
Use in conjunction with “on-demand”
items/tasks (e.g., MC, SA, EA) at key
phases/milestones.
17
SA-Example
DIRECTIONS: Read the following information about the rainforest. Use the
information to help you answer Question 2 in the space provided. This question is
worth two (2) points towards your overall score.
In the Rainforest
Life in the rainforest is wet and wild. Rainforests are jungle areas that have a large
amount of rainfall each year. Rainforests cover a small part of this earth. They are
home to over half of the different types of animals and plants. Rainforests are not
only beautiful, but also very important to people. We get food from the rainforest
such as chocolate and cinnamon. Rainforests also have ingredients for many
medicines. Even though rainforests are important, many are being cut down. Many
people are working to make sure that the rainforests are saved because we will need
them in the future.

2. In two complete sentences, explain why people should help save the rainforests.
________________________________________________________________________
18
________________________________________________________________________
(0002.SCI.GR5.POST.SA-LV2-STD2.2A)
Procedural Steps: SA Tasks
Step 1. Review the targeted content standard(s).
Step 2. Determine which aspects of the standard(s) can be best
measured by having students “construct” a short response.

Step 3. Select and list aspects of the targeted content standard(s) to
be measured.
Step 4. Create a prompt, select a passage, or develop a scenario for
students.
Step 5. Develop a clear statement that articulates specific criteria
for the test-taker to provide.
19
QA Checklist: SA Tasks


Presents a prompt, scenario, or passage using contentspecific terminology, along with developmentally
appropriate references.



Ensures the prompt, passage, or scenario is concise, free of
jargon, and grammatically correct.



Uses appropriate verbs to communicate expectations.



Articulates response instructions using a clear sentence
structure.



Communicates in clear, unambiguous terms the extent of
the expected answer.
20
EA Task- Example
DIRECTIONS: For Question 3, read the following scenario and construct a response to both Parts A
and B. Parts A and B are worth four (4) points each, for a total of 8 points towards your overall score.
Scenario #1-You are catering a large dinner for 60 people in which chicken and beef will be served
along with sautéed green beans in a light cream sauce. Fresh strawberries and ice cream will be
offered as desert. There is limited counter space for food preparation and the hot water is only

reaching a temperature of 70o F.
3. In a short paragraph (no more than 4 sentences), respond to both Part A and B on a separate piece
of paper.

Part A: List and explain at least three (3) safety conditions that need to be addressed to prevent food
contamination.
Part B: Given the cooking area constraints, develop two (2) alternative courses of action that will
result in an on-time meal delivery.
(0003.FCS.NCIII.EA-LV3-FNW1.4)
21
Procedural Steps: EA Tasks
Step 1. Review the targeted content standard(s).
Step 2. Determine which aspects of the standard(s) can be
best measured by having students “construct” an
extended response to a given prompt, scenario, or
passage.
Step 3. Select and list aspects of the targeted content
standard(s) to be measured.
Step 4. Create a prompt, select a passage, or develop a
scenario for students.

Step 5. Develop a clear statement for each subordinate task
that articulates specific criteria for the test-taker to
provide.
22
QA Checklist: EA Tasks


Presents a prompt, scenario, or passage using content-specific
terminology, along with developmentally appropriate
references.



Aligns the prompt, scenario, passage and test-taker response
requirements with the targeted content standard(s) identified in
the test blueprint.



Uses appropriate verbs to communicate expectation.



Communicates in clear, unambiguous terms the extent of the
expected response.



Ensures non-content specific behaviors (e.g., attitude,
motivational levels, engagement, attendance, etc.) are not
articulated in either the response criteria or scoring rubric.
23
Extended Performance (EP) Task Example
DIRECTIONS FOR TASK 1 of 3: For Task #1, create a mood portrait and collage. You will have
one (1) week to complete this task. This task is worth twelve (12) points towards your overall score.
Task #1-Using what you know about the Elements of Art and the Principles of Design create both a

mood portrait of yourself and a collage. Think about the concepts we studied in class and the different
ways artists have created works of art that have focused on people’s faces. Use paint and color mixing
techniques to create a mood portrait of yourself and construct a collage on which to place your
portrait. Use the scoring rubric to guide your art work development.
CriteriaA.

Create a mood portrait of yourself showing proportional breakdowns of facial features.

B.

Construct a collage using monochromatic or analogous color schemes and transfer your drawing
on to the collage.
24

(0001.VPA.ART5.EP-LV4-1.1 & 1.2)
Procedural Steps: EP Tasks
Step 1. Review the targeted content standard(s).
Step 2. Determine which aspects of the standard(s) can be best
measured by having students “develop” a complex
response, demonstration, or performance over an extend
period of time (e.g., two weeks).
Step 3. Select and list all aspects of the targeted content
standard(s) to be measured.

Step 4. Create a project, portfolio, or demonstration expectation
statement that includes subordinate tasks, which are
aligned to the test blueprint.
Step 5. Develop a clear statement for each subordinate task that
articulates specific criteria for the test-taker to provide.
25
QA Checklist: EP Tasks


Presents project, portfolio, or demonstration using contentspecific terminology, along with developmentally appropriate
references.



Aligns the project, portfolio, or demonstration and test-taker
response requirements with the targeted content standards
identified in the test blueprint.



Uses appropriate verbs to communicate expectation.



Communicates in clear, unambiguous terms the extent of the
expected answer.



Ensures non-content specific behaviors (e.g., attitude,
motivational levels, engagement, attendance, etc.) are not
articulated in either the response criteria or scoring rubric.
26
STEP 5
Scoring Keys and Rubrics

27
Scoring Keys: MC Items
 Ensure that each item has a single, correct
answer.
 Avoid errors by validating answers after the key
is developed.
 Validate answers prior to form review.

 Revalidate answers to any changed item.

28
Scoring Key: MC Example
Scoring Key
Assessment Name

Grade/Course

Administration

Total
Possible
Points

Social Studies Final

Elementary Social
Studies-Grade 4

Post-test

50

Item #

Item Tag

Item Type

Point Value

Answer

1

0001.SOS.GR4.POST.MC-LV1-GEO2.1

MC

1

B

2

0002.SOS.GR4.POST.MC-LV1-GEO2.4

MC

1

A

29
Procedural Steps: MC Items
Step 1. Enter the assessment information at the top of the
Scoring Key.
Step 2. Record the item number, item tag (optional), item
type, and point value.
Step 3. Record the MC answers in the Answer column.

Step 4. Repeat steps 1-4 until all items on the test
blueprint are reflected within the Scoring Key.
Step 5. Validate that each question-to-answer relationship
is recorded correctly.
30
QA Checklist: MC Items


All items articulated on the test specifications are
represented within the Scoring Key.



All items have been validated to ensure only one
correct answer exists among the possible answer
options.



Answers do not create a discernible pattern.



Answers are “balanced” among the possible
options.



Answers are revalidated after the assessment
reviews are complete.
31
Rubric Development
 Assign point values for different levels of

performance.
 Describe the performance continuum using

content-based language.
 Ensure that language is clear and concise.

 Determine the appropriate rubric type:
• Single dimension vs. multi-dimensional
• Holistic vs. analytic
32
Holistic vs. Analytic
Scoring Rubrics
Holistic
• Provides a single score based on
an overall determination of the
test-taker’s performance.
• Assesses the concept in its
totality.
• Difficult to establish scorer
consistency (i.e., inter-rater
agreement).

Analytic
• Identifies and assesses specific
aspects of a response.
• Assigns a score to each
dimension.
• Combines dimension scores to
produce an overall score.

33
Single vs. Multi-dimensional
Scoring Rubrics
Single
• Aligns to a specific content standard.
• Reflects a limited point range of the
performance continuum.
• Best suited for on-demand tasks.
• Easiest to maintain scorer
consistency.

Multi
• Aligns with several content
standards.
• Assigns scores to each dimension.
• Best suited for a culminating event
over time (e.g., science project).
• Hardest to maintain scorer
consistency.

34
Rubric Construction
 Use clear, concise, and objective language so scorers would

assign exact/adjacent scores to the performance being
evaluated.
• Describe whether spelling and/or grammar will impact the final score.
• Avoid using words like “many”, “some”, and “few” without adding numeric
descriptors to quantify these terms.
• Avoid using subjective words such, as “creativity” or “effort”.
• Avoid subjective adjectives such as “excellent” or “inadequate”.

 Create content-based descriptions of the expected answer for

each level of performance on the rubric.
 Provide an example of a complete, correct response.
 Reference the targeted content standards in multi-dimensional

rubrics.

35
Scoring Rubric: SA Single
Dimension-Example
Sample Response for: “In two complete sentences, explain why people should
help save the rainforests.”

2 points

The student’s response is written in complete sentences and contains two valid
reasons for saving the rainforest.
“People must save the rainforest to save the animals’ homes. People need to save
the rainforest because we get ingredients for many medicines from there.”

1 point

The student’s response contains only one reason.
“People should save the rainforest because it is important and because people
and animals need it.”

0 points

There is no response, or the response is completely incorrect or irrelevant.

36
Scoring Rubric: EA Single
Dimension-Example
Sample Response for: “List the steps of the Scientific Method. Briefly explain each one.”

4 points

3 points

2 points

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Ask a Question- Ask a question about something that you observe: How, What, When, Who, Which, Why, or Where?
Do Background Research- Use library and Internet research to help you find the best way to do things.
Construct a Hypothesis- Make an educated guess about how things work.
Test Your Hypothesis- Do an experiment.
Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion- Collect your measurements and analyze them to see if your hypothesis is
true or false.
Communicate Your Results- Publish a final report in a scientific journal or by presenting the results on a poster.
Ask a Question
Do Background Research-Use library and Internet research.
Construct a Hypothesis- An educated guess about how things work.
Test Your Hypothesis- Do an experiment.
Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion
Communicate Your Results
Ask a Question
Do Background Research
Construct a Hypothesis
Test Your Hypothesis
Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion
Communicate Your Results

1 point

Ask a Question, Hypothesis, Do an Experiment, Analyze Your Data

0 points

“I don’t know.”

37
Scoring Rubric: EP Multi-Dimension-Example
Dimension

Advanced (4 pts.)

Proficient (3 pts.)

Basic (2 pts.)

Below Basic (1 pt.)

Art Elements
and Principles
- Sketch a
Face

The drawing of the face shows a
breakdown of the proportions of
the facial features with a lot of
attention paid to details, such as
strands of hair, details in eyes.
The facial expression establishes a
mood.

The drawing of the face shows a
breakdown of the face with facial
features placed in proportion to one
another. The portrait lacks facial
expression, thus no mood is shown in
the drawing.

The drawing of the face shows
some breakdown of the face but
following through with other
visual cues, such as eyebrows
lining up with tops of the ears, are
not evident. No attention is paid
to facial expression to establish
mood.

The drawing of the face is not
broken down into proportional
segments, so the placement of
the facial features is random and
abstracts the realism of the
portrait. No attention is paid to
details, such as strands of hair,
eyebrows, eyelashes, etc.

Art Elements
and Principles
- Color
Scheme

Background collage uses either a
monochromatic or analogous color
scheme with all ends of the
pictures glued down. The
arrangement of the collage is
unique using either space of
transition of color in a planned
way. The color mixing and
transition of the paint in the
portrait shows a broad range of
tones, and the application contours
the shape of the face.
Portrait and background show a
full understanding of
monochromatic and analogous
color schemes. Paint mixing is
gradual using a range of hues that
have more than eight tones, and
the tones are applied enhancing
the contour and roundness of the
face.

Background collage uses either a
monochromatic or analogous color
scheme with some ends of the pictures
sticking up or small portions of the
oak tag showing through. The color
mixing with the paint in the portrait
shows a range of either a
monochromatic or analogous color
scheme, but no awareness of contour
color application.

Background collage has at least
60% of the paper fitting into either
a monochromatic or analogous
color scheme. Color mixing in the
portrait is blotchy and not blended
well; each color is separate with
no attempt to transition one color
to the next.

Background collage and color
mixing show no identification to
either a monochromatic or an
analogous color scheme.

Portrait and background show
understanding of monochromatic and
analogous color schemes. Some
edges of the collage are not glued
down. The color portrait is painted
with a range of six or more hues of a
monochromatic or analogous color
scheme. The transitions of color are
smooth and gradual.

Portrait and background show
some understanding of
monochromatic and analogous
color schemes with only one or
two colors that do not fit into the
selected schemes. Half of the
color mixing with paint shows
38
gradual transitions of color.

Portrait and background show
no knowledge of
monochromatic or analogous
color schemes. There is no
range of color mixing within
either color scheme with no
gradual transitions of color.

Art Elements
and Principles
Point of View
- Original
Work
Procedural Steps: Scoring Rubrics
Step 1.

Review the SA, EA, or EP task and the criteria articulated
in the stem/directions.

Step 2.

Select a “generic” rubric structure (see Template #2:
Building the Assessment) based upon (a) scoring criteria,
and (b) the number of dimensions being measured.

Step 3.

Modify the rubric language using specific criteria expected
in the response to award the maximum number of points.

Step 4.

Determine how much the response can deviate from “fully
correct” in order to earn the next (lower) point value.
[Continue until the full range of possible scores is
described.]

Step 5.

During the review, ensure the response expectation, scoring
rubric, and test blueprint are fully aligned. 39
QA Checklist: Scoring Rubrics


Scoring rubrics must:


reflect a performance continuum;



be clear and concise; and,



include all dimensions (components) of the task.



Sample expectations are used to provide a guide as to
what demonstrates a “fully complete” response.



Avoid including non-cognitive attributes (e.g.,
motivation, timeliness, etc.).
40
STEP 6
Test Forms

41
Test Form


Provides content-based questions and/or tasks.



Displays the sequence of items, prompts, and
tasks the test-taker is to respond to during the
testing period.



Includes administration guidelines.



May also include scoring rubrics for students to
refer to when responding to EP tasks.

42
Test Form Development
Administration Guidelines…


Contain three (3) sets of standardized directions:
•

Preparation: Details the steps required prior to administration (accessing test
materials, make-up process).

•

Administration: Details the steps required during administration (administrator
scripts, test directions).

•

After Testing: Details the steps required after administration (scoring instructions,
test security).



Specify materials, administration procedures, approved test
accommodations, and detailed scoring directions.



Provide directions for maintaining the security of testing
materials.
43
Test Form Development (cont.)
Item/Task Organization…


Place item/tasks in a logical sequence.



Ensure sufficient spacing among items, tasks,
directions, answer options, response areas, etc.



Keep stimuli and questions on the same page.



Maintain similar “style” in how information is
presented to test takers.



For EP tasks, include a timeline for each completion
of each subtask, along with the date the final project
will be scored.
44
Procedural Steps: Administration
Step 1. Create a series of administrative steps for before, during, and
after the assessment window.

Step 2. Explain any requirements or equipment necessary, including
accommodations. State any ancillary materials (e.g.,
calculators needed or allowed by the test-takers.
Step 3. Identify the approximate time afforded to complete the
assessment, including each subtask in an EP task.

Step 4. Include detailed “scripts” articulating exactly what is to be
communicated to the students, especially when administering
performance tasks over a long period of time.
Step 5. Include procedures for scoring, administering make-ups, and
handling completed assessments.
45
QA Checklist: Administration


Guidelines explain administrative steps before, during, and
after the assessment window.



Guidelines articulate the step-by-step procedures during each
phase of administration.



Requirements for completing the performance measure
items/tasks, including accommodations, equipment, and
material are included.



Approximate time needed to complete the overall
performance measure is provided.



Detailed “scripts” articulate the information to be
communicated in a standardized manner.
46
Procedural Steps: Test Form
Step 1. Develop a cover page stating the test form developed and
include any necessary demographic information (e.g.,
section number, student name, date administered, etc.).
Step 2. Organize the items/tasks/prompts in a sequence that will
maximize student engagement.
Step 3. Add item tags and section dividers (optional).
Step 4. Refine the draft form to minimize “blank space”, verify
picture, graph, table, and figure placement in relationship
to the item/task, and ensure MC answer options do not
drift from one page to the next.

Step 5. Add scoring rubric or criteria for constructed response
tasks.
47
QA Checklist: Test Form


Directions state what to do, where and how to
respond, and the point value for items/tasks.



Items/tasks/prompts on the test form reflect the
blueprint.



Form layout minimizes “white space”, “drift”
“crowding of items”, and distance from stem to
response options/placement.



Forms are free from unclear, small, or unnecessary
images, figures, charts, or graphs.
48
Reflection

• Items/Tasks

Step 5

• Test Forms

• Scoring
Keys &
Rubrics

Step 4

Step 6

49
Final Check
Performance Measure Rubric


Strand 2 evaluates six (6) aspects presented within this module.
Each aspect is rated using the following scale:
•

1 – Fully addressed

•

.5 – Partially addressed

•

0 – Not addressed

•

N/A – Not applicable

Note: The Performance Measure Rubric is found within the “Stuff” folder
within this module and in the “Template” folder of the Review module.
50
Final Check
Performance Measure Rubric Strand 2
Task
ID
2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

2.6

Descriptor
Items/tasks and score keys are developed using standardized procedures, including scoring
rubrics for human-scored, open-ended questions (e.g., short constructed response, writing
prompts, performance tasks, etc.).
Item/tasks are created and reviewed in terms of: (a) alignment to the targeted content
standards, (b) content accuracy, (c) developmental appropriateness, (d) cognitive demand, and
(e) bias, sensitivity, and fairness.
Administrative guidelines are developed that contain the step-by-step procedures used to
administer the performance measure in a consistent manner, including scripts to orally
communicate directions to students, day and time constraints, and allowable
accommodations/adaptations.
Scoring guidelines are developed for human-scored items/tasks to promote score consistency
across items/tasks and among different scorers. These guidelines articulate point values for
each item/task used to combine results into an overall score.
Summary scores are reported using both raw score points and performance level.
Performance levels reflect the range of scores possible on the assessment and use terms or
symbols to denote each level.
The total time to administer the performance measure is developmentally appropriate for the
test-taker. Generally, this is 30 minutes or less for young students and up to 60 minutes per
51
session for older students (high school).

Rating
Summary & Next Steps
Summary


Developed items/tasks to measure specific components of the
targeted content standards, objective scoring keys/rubrics, and
the completed assessment form along with Administration
Guidelines.

Next Steps
Module 3: Reviewing the Assessment


Conduct quality reviews of the assessment form including
items/tasks, scoring key/rubrics, and administration guidelines.
52

Más contenido relacionado

Destacado

Samit Malkani_TiE Institute_Social Media Content Strategy_280712
Samit Malkani_TiE Institute_Social Media Content Strategy_280712Samit Malkani_TiE Institute_Social Media Content Strategy_280712
Samit Malkani_TiE Institute_Social Media Content Strategy_280712Samit Malkani
 
On going evaluations
On going evaluationsOn going evaluations
On going evaluationsPJG123
 
Rewardify48dd61368e5b58eeb8a7f09eba7a1b2135fea169
Rewardify48dd61368e5b58eeb8a7f09eba7a1b2135fea169Rewardify48dd61368e5b58eeb8a7f09eba7a1b2135fea169
Rewardify48dd61368e5b58eeb8a7f09eba7a1b2135fea169Anil Rohatgi
 
On going evaluations ask
On going evaluations askOn going evaluations ask
On going evaluations askhndoja
 
Republican Candidate Email Marketing Analysis
Republican Candidate Email Marketing AnalysisRepublican Candidate Email Marketing Analysis
Republican Candidate Email Marketing AnalysisSilverpop
 
Introduction
IntroductionIntroduction
IntroductionAmau Mau
 
Experiments evidence template
Experiments evidence templateExperiments evidence template
Experiments evidence templatekatiesteph5
 
022508 Here And There Metanomics Transcript
022508 Here And There Metanomics Transcript022508 Here And There Metanomics Transcript
022508 Here And There Metanomics TranscriptRemedy Communications
 

Destacado (15)

VIPTV FR
VIPTV FRVIPTV FR
VIPTV FR
 
Samit Malkani_TiE Institute_Social Media Content Strategy_280712
Samit Malkani_TiE Institute_Social Media Content Strategy_280712Samit Malkani_TiE Institute_Social Media Content Strategy_280712
Samit Malkani_TiE Institute_Social Media Content Strategy_280712
 
On going evaluations
On going evaluationsOn going evaluations
On going evaluations
 
Rewardify48dd61368e5b58eeb8a7f09eba7a1b2135fea169
Rewardify48dd61368e5b58eeb8a7f09eba7a1b2135fea169Rewardify48dd61368e5b58eeb8a7f09eba7a1b2135fea169
Rewardify48dd61368e5b58eeb8a7f09eba7a1b2135fea169
 
On going evaluations ask
On going evaluations askOn going evaluations ask
On going evaluations ask
 
My layouts eval
My layouts evalMy layouts eval
My layouts eval
 
Website diary
Website diaryWebsite diary
Website diary
 
Briefs for merge
Briefs   for mergeBriefs   for merge
Briefs for merge
 
Republican Candidate Email Marketing Analysis
Republican Candidate Email Marketing AnalysisRepublican Candidate Email Marketing Analysis
Republican Candidate Email Marketing Analysis
 
Introduction
IntroductionIntroduction
Introduction
 
Experiments evidence template
Experiments evidence templateExperiments evidence template
Experiments evidence template
 
Contact shet
Contact shetContact shet
Contact shet
 
Inflation
InflationInflation
Inflation
 
Content matters
Content mattersContent matters
Content matters
 
022508 Here And There Metanomics Transcript
022508 Here And There Metanomics Transcript022508 Here And There Metanomics Transcript
022508 Here And There Metanomics Transcript
 

Similar a QS M2-Building the Assessment-11FEB14

M2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
M2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINALM2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
M2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINALResearch in Action, Inc.
 
M1-Designing the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
M1-Designing the Assessment-June 2014-FINALM1-Designing the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
M1-Designing the Assessment-June 2014-FINALResearch in Action, Inc.
 
Template #3a performance measure rubric-final-la
Template #3a performance measure rubric-final-laTemplate #3a performance measure rubric-final-la
Template #3a performance measure rubric-final-laResearch in Action, Inc.
 
Template #3-Performance Measure Rubric-June 2014-FINAL
Template #3-Performance Measure Rubric-June 2014-FINALTemplate #3-Performance Measure Rubric-June 2014-FINAL
Template #3-Performance Measure Rubric-June 2014-FINALResearch in Action, Inc.
 
Template #6-Performance Measure Rubric-May 2014-Final
Template #6-Performance Measure Rubric-May 2014-FinalTemplate #6-Performance Measure Rubric-May 2014-Final
Template #6-Performance Measure Rubric-May 2014-FinalResearch in Action, Inc.
 
Test Construction and Specifications....
Test Construction and Specifications....Test Construction and Specifications....
Test Construction and Specifications....jovenilBacatan
 
Parcc public blueprints narrated math 04262013
Parcc public blueprints narrated math 04262013Parcc public blueprints narrated math 04262013
Parcc public blueprints narrated math 04262013Achieve, Inc.
 
TEST DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION (6462)
TEST DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION (6462)TEST DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION (6462)
TEST DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION (6462)HennaAnsari
 
Template #2 Building the Assessment-22JAN14
Template #2 Building the Assessment-22JAN14 Template #2 Building the Assessment-22JAN14
Template #2 Building the Assessment-22JAN14 Research in Action, Inc.
 
Designing Classroom Language Tests
Designing Classroom Language TestsDesigning Classroom Language Tests
Designing Classroom Language TestsYee Bee Choo
 
Constructing-the-Test-Items-for_DepEd.pptx
Constructing-the-Test-Items-for_DepEd.pptxConstructing-the-Test-Items-for_DepEd.pptx
Constructing-the-Test-Items-for_DepEd.pptxmarielouisemiranda1
 
SLO overview power point 2014
SLO overview power point 2014SLO overview power point 2014
SLO overview power point 2014Ann Noonen
 
M3-Reviewing the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
M3-Reviewing the Assessment-June 2014-FINALM3-Reviewing the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
M3-Reviewing the Assessment-June 2014-FINALResearch in Action, Inc.
 
Template #2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
Template #2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINALTemplate #2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
Template #2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINALResearch in Action, Inc.
 

Similar a QS M2-Building the Assessment-11FEB14 (20)

M2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
M2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINALM2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
M2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
 
QS M1-Designing the Assessment-22JAN14
QS M1-Designing the Assessment-22JAN14QS M1-Designing the Assessment-22JAN14
QS M1-Designing the Assessment-22JAN14
 
M1-Designing the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
M1-Designing the Assessment-June 2014-FINALM1-Designing the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
M1-Designing the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
 
Template #3a performance measure rubric-final-la
Template #3a performance measure rubric-final-laTemplate #3a performance measure rubric-final-la
Template #3a performance measure rubric-final-la
 
Template #3-Performance Measure Rubric-June 2014-FINAL
Template #3-Performance Measure Rubric-June 2014-FINALTemplate #3-Performance Measure Rubric-June 2014-FINAL
Template #3-Performance Measure Rubric-June 2014-FINAL
 
Template #6-Performance Measure Rubric-May 2014-Final
Template #6-Performance Measure Rubric-May 2014-FinalTemplate #6-Performance Measure Rubric-May 2014-Final
Template #6-Performance Measure Rubric-May 2014-Final
 
Test Construction and Specifications....
Test Construction and Specifications....Test Construction and Specifications....
Test Construction and Specifications....
 
Parcc public blueprints narrated math 04262013
Parcc public blueprints narrated math 04262013Parcc public blueprints narrated math 04262013
Parcc public blueprints narrated math 04262013
 
TEST DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION (6462)
TEST DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION (6462)TEST DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION (6462)
TEST DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION (6462)
 
Template #2 Building the Assessment-22JAN14
Template #2 Building the Assessment-22JAN14 Template #2 Building the Assessment-22JAN14
Template #2 Building the Assessment-22JAN14
 
ATP 2012
ATP 2012ATP 2012
ATP 2012
 
Designing Classroom Language Tests
Designing Classroom Language TestsDesigning Classroom Language Tests
Designing Classroom Language Tests
 
QS M3-Reviewing the Assessment-11FEB14
QS M3-Reviewing the Assessment-11FEB14QS M3-Reviewing the Assessment-11FEB14
QS M3-Reviewing the Assessment-11FEB14
 
Performance measure rubric
Performance measure rubricPerformance measure rubric
Performance measure rubric
 
Constructing-the-Test-Items-for_DepEd.pptx
Constructing-the-Test-Items-for_DepEd.pptxConstructing-the-Test-Items-for_DepEd.pptx
Constructing-the-Test-Items-for_DepEd.pptx
 
SLO overview power point 2014
SLO overview power point 2014SLO overview power point 2014
SLO overview power point 2014
 
M3-Reviewing the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
M3-Reviewing the Assessment-June 2014-FINALM3-Reviewing the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
M3-Reviewing the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
 
Designing language test
Designing language testDesigning language test
Designing language test
 
Template #2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
Template #2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINALTemplate #2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
Template #2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
 
Objective tips
Objective tipsObjective tips
Objective tips
 

Más de Research in Action, Inc.

Quick Start Users Guide-June 2014-Working Draft
Quick Start Users Guide-June 2014-Working DraftQuick Start Users Guide-June 2014-Working Draft
Quick Start Users Guide-June 2014-Working DraftResearch in Action, Inc.
 
Performance Task Framework-June 2014-FINAL
Performance Task Framework-June 2014-FINALPerformance Task Framework-June 2014-FINAL
Performance Task Framework-June 2014-FINALResearch in Action, Inc.
 
Assessment Selection Paper-Herman_Heritage_Goldschmidt (2011)
Assessment Selection Paper-Herman_Heritage_Goldschmidt (2011)Assessment Selection Paper-Herman_Heritage_Goldschmidt (2011)
Assessment Selection Paper-Herman_Heritage_Goldschmidt (2011)Research in Action, Inc.
 

Más de Research in Action, Inc. (20)

SLO for teachers
SLO for teachersSLO for teachers
SLO for teachers
 
M3-Reviewing the SLO-SSO-DemoSite
M3-Reviewing the SLO-SSO-DemoSiteM3-Reviewing the SLO-SSO-DemoSite
M3-Reviewing the SLO-SSO-DemoSite
 
M2-Building the SLO-SSO-DemoSite
M2-Building the SLO-SSO-DemoSiteM2-Building the SLO-SSO-DemoSite
M2-Building the SLO-SSO-DemoSite
 
M1 Designing the SLO-SSO-Demo Site
M1 Designing the SLO-SSO-Demo SiteM1 Designing the SLO-SSO-Demo Site
M1 Designing the SLO-SSO-Demo Site
 
M0 School Leader Orientation-Demo Site
M0 School Leader Orientation-Demo SiteM0 School Leader Orientation-Demo Site
M0 School Leader Orientation-Demo Site
 
M0 Orientation to the SLO-SSO-DemoSite
M0 Orientation to the SLO-SSO-DemoSiteM0 Orientation to the SLO-SSO-DemoSite
M0 Orientation to the SLO-SSO-DemoSite
 
Template #3 coherency rubric-final-jp
Template #3 coherency rubric-final-jpTemplate #3 coherency rubric-final-jp
Template #3 coherency rubric-final-jp
 
Template #2c building the sso-final
Template #2c building the sso-finalTemplate #2c building the sso-final
Template #2c building the sso-final
 
Template #2a building the slo-final
Template #2a building the slo-finalTemplate #2a building the slo-final
Template #2a building the slo-final
 
Template #1 designing the slo-sso-final
Template #1 designing the slo-sso-finalTemplate #1 designing the slo-sso-final
Template #1 designing the slo-sso-final
 
M3 reviewing the slo-sso-final
M3 reviewing the slo-sso-finalM3 reviewing the slo-sso-final
M3 reviewing the slo-sso-final
 
M2 building the slo-sso-final
M2 building the slo-sso-finalM2 building the slo-sso-final
M2 building the slo-sso-final
 
M1 designing the slo-sso-final
M1 designing the slo-sso-finalM1 designing the slo-sso-final
M1 designing the slo-sso-final
 
M0 school leader orientation-final
M0 school leader orientation-finalM0 school leader orientation-final
M0 school leader orientation-final
 
M0 orientation to the slo-sso-final
M0 orientation to the slo-sso-finalM0 orientation to the slo-sso-final
M0 orientation to the slo-sso-final
 
Educator evaluation policy overview-final
Educator evaluation policy overview-finalEducator evaluation policy overview-final
Educator evaluation policy overview-final
 
Quick Start Users Guide-June 2014-Working Draft
Quick Start Users Guide-June 2014-Working DraftQuick Start Users Guide-June 2014-Working Draft
Quick Start Users Guide-June 2014-Working Draft
 
Performance Task Framework-June 2014-FINAL
Performance Task Framework-June 2014-FINALPerformance Task Framework-June 2014-FINAL
Performance Task Framework-June 2014-FINAL
 
Depth of Knowledge Chart
Depth of Knowledge ChartDepth of Knowledge Chart
Depth of Knowledge Chart
 
Assessment Selection Paper-Herman_Heritage_Goldschmidt (2011)
Assessment Selection Paper-Herman_Heritage_Goldschmidt (2011)Assessment Selection Paper-Herman_Heritage_Goldschmidt (2011)
Assessment Selection Paper-Herman_Heritage_Goldschmidt (2011)
 

Último

ARTERIAL BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS........pptx
ARTERIAL BLOOD  GAS ANALYSIS........pptxARTERIAL BLOOD  GAS ANALYSIS........pptx
ARTERIAL BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS........pptxAneriPatwari
 
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptxmary850239
 
Sulphonamides, mechanisms and their uses
Sulphonamides, mechanisms and their usesSulphonamides, mechanisms and their uses
Sulphonamides, mechanisms and their usesVijayaLaxmi84
 
How to Uninstall a Module in Odoo 17 Using Command Line
How to Uninstall a Module in Odoo 17 Using Command LineHow to Uninstall a Module in Odoo 17 Using Command Line
How to Uninstall a Module in Odoo 17 Using Command LineCeline George
 
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWMythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQuiz Club NITW
 
Comparative Literature in India by Amiya dev.pptx
Comparative Literature in India by Amiya dev.pptxComparative Literature in India by Amiya dev.pptx
Comparative Literature in India by Amiya dev.pptxAvaniJani1
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (GLOB...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (GLOB...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (GLOB...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (GLOB...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Beauty Amidst the Bytes_ Unearthing Unexpected Advantages of the Digital Wast...
Beauty Amidst the Bytes_ Unearthing Unexpected Advantages of the Digital Wast...Beauty Amidst the Bytes_ Unearthing Unexpected Advantages of the Digital Wast...
Beauty Amidst the Bytes_ Unearthing Unexpected Advantages of the Digital Wast...DhatriParmar
 
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQ-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQuiz Club NITW
 
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptxBIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptxSayali Powar
 
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQ-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQuiz Club NITW
 
Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...
Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...
Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...HetalPathak10
 
4.9.24 Social Capital and Social Exclusion.pptx
4.9.24 Social Capital and Social Exclusion.pptx4.9.24 Social Capital and Social Exclusion.pptx
4.9.24 Social Capital and Social Exclusion.pptxmary850239
 
Scientific Writing :Research Discourse
Scientific  Writing :Research  DiscourseScientific  Writing :Research  Discourse
Scientific Writing :Research DiscourseAnita GoswamiGiri
 
ICS 2208 Lecture Slide Notes for Topic 6
ICS 2208 Lecture Slide Notes for Topic 6ICS 2208 Lecture Slide Notes for Topic 6
ICS 2208 Lecture Slide Notes for Topic 6Vanessa Camilleri
 

Último (20)

ARTERIAL BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS........pptx
ARTERIAL BLOOD  GAS ANALYSIS........pptxARTERIAL BLOOD  GAS ANALYSIS........pptx
ARTERIAL BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS........pptx
 
Spearman's correlation,Formula,Advantages,
Spearman's correlation,Formula,Advantages,Spearman's correlation,Formula,Advantages,
Spearman's correlation,Formula,Advantages,
 
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
4.11.24 Poverty and Inequality in America.pptx
 
Sulphonamides, mechanisms and their uses
Sulphonamides, mechanisms and their usesSulphonamides, mechanisms and their uses
Sulphonamides, mechanisms and their uses
 
How to Uninstall a Module in Odoo 17 Using Command Line
How to Uninstall a Module in Odoo 17 Using Command LineHow to Uninstall a Module in Odoo 17 Using Command Line
How to Uninstall a Module in Odoo 17 Using Command Line
 
Faculty Profile prashantha K EEE dept Sri Sairam college of Engineering
Faculty Profile prashantha K EEE dept Sri Sairam college of EngineeringFaculty Profile prashantha K EEE dept Sri Sairam college of Engineering
Faculty Profile prashantha K EEE dept Sri Sairam college of Engineering
 
INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptx
INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptxINCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptx
INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptx
 
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWMythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Mythology Quiz-4th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
 
Comparative Literature in India by Amiya dev.pptx
Comparative Literature in India by Amiya dev.pptxComparative Literature in India by Amiya dev.pptx
Comparative Literature in India by Amiya dev.pptx
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (GLOB...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (GLOB...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (GLOB...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO ĐƠN VỊ BÀI HỌC - CẢ NĂM - CÓ FILE NGHE (GLOB...
 
Beauty Amidst the Bytes_ Unearthing Unexpected Advantages of the Digital Wast...
Beauty Amidst the Bytes_ Unearthing Unexpected Advantages of the Digital Wast...Beauty Amidst the Bytes_ Unearthing Unexpected Advantages of the Digital Wast...
Beauty Amidst the Bytes_ Unearthing Unexpected Advantages of the Digital Wast...
 
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQ-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
 
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptxBIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
 
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQ-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
 
Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...
Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...
Satirical Depths - A Study of Gabriel Okara's Poem - 'You Laughed and Laughed...
 
4.9.24 Social Capital and Social Exclusion.pptx
4.9.24 Social Capital and Social Exclusion.pptx4.9.24 Social Capital and Social Exclusion.pptx
4.9.24 Social Capital and Social Exclusion.pptx
 
Chi-Square Test Non Parametric Test Categorical Variable
Chi-Square Test Non Parametric Test Categorical VariableChi-Square Test Non Parametric Test Categorical Variable
Chi-Square Test Non Parametric Test Categorical Variable
 
Scientific Writing :Research Discourse
Scientific  Writing :Research  DiscourseScientific  Writing :Research  Discourse
Scientific Writing :Research Discourse
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Large Language Models"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Large Language Models"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Large Language Models"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Large Language Models"
 
ICS 2208 Lecture Slide Notes for Topic 6
ICS 2208 Lecture Slide Notes for Topic 6ICS 2208 Lecture Slide Notes for Topic 6
ICS 2208 Lecture Slide Notes for Topic 6
 

QS M2-Building the Assessment-11FEB14

  • 1. Assessment Literacy Series Quick Start © Module 2 1
  • 2. “Build” Objectives Participants will: 1. Develop items/tasks. 2. Create scoring keys and/or scoring rubrics. 3. Construct assessment forms with Administration Guidelines. 2
  • 3. Helpful Resources Training Material  Modularized into three (3) phases  Organized into four (4) subfolders: • • Guides: Handouts, Rules of Thumb, Models, etc. • Templates: Forms, Spreadsheets, Calculators, etc. •  Videos: PowerPoint Presentations, Videos, etc. Stuff: Research, Technical Papers, Websites, etc. Delivered via online learning platform: Homeroom http://homeroom.ria2001.org/login.php 3
  • 4. Helpful Resources (cont.) Participants may wish to reference the following: Guides ► Handout #2 – Building the Assessment-Examples  Model #1 – Elementary Art Grade 5  Model #2 – Pre-Algebra Grade 8  Model #3 – Nutrition and Culinary, Level III (High School) Templates ► Template #2 – Building the Assessment Other “Stuff” ► Cognitive Demand Guide document ► Research in Action’s “Smart Book” ► Textbooks, teacher manuals, and other supplemental materials ► Performance Task Framework template ► Performance Measure Rubric 4
  • 7. Generic Guidelines  Develop questions and answers at the same time.  Focus on both the content standard and its implied cognitive demand.  Refine by screening for bias, developmental appropriateness, fairness, and sensitive topics. 7
  • 8. Essential Guidelines  Items/tasks are considered secure even in draft form.  Adhere to copyright laws and avoid plagiarism.  Ensure that images, charts, and graphs are clear.  Use scenarios and passages that are: • relatively short; • developmentally appropriate; and, • sensitive to readability. 8
  • 9. Multiple Choice (MC) Guidelines: Stem  Develop a stem (question) and answer options.  Keep the stem concise.  Ensure that vocabulary is developmentally appropriate.  Include as much of the item as possible in the stem.  Avoid irrelevant and misleading information. 9
  • 10. Multiple Choice (MC) Guidelines: Response Options  Use three (3) options for Grades K-1 and four (4) options for Grades 2-12.  Ensure that there is only one (1) correct answer.  Make sure distractors are plausible (realistic).  Avoid “All of the above.”, “None of the above.”, and “Both A and B are Correct.”  Present options in ascending/descending order when possible.  Keep options similar in length, sentence structure, and complexity of thought.  Ensure that all options are grammatically consistent with the stem. 10
  • 11. MC Item-Example 1. Which river runs from north to south and empties into the Gulf of Mexico? Stem A. Columbia B. Mississippi C. Potomac Answer Options Item Tag D. Ohio (0001.SOS.GR4.POST.MC-LV1-GEO2.1) 11
  • 12. Item Tag Codification (optional)  Each item/task requires a unique identifier.  Tags contain information used to identify each item/task.  Item tags consist of: • Item number • Course/content area • Grade-level • Test-type • Item-type • Cognitive-level • Content standard identification number Item # Course Grade Test Type Item Type DoK Standard ID 12 (0001.ART.GR5.POST.MC-LV2-4.1)
  • 13. Procedural Steps: MC Items Step 1. Review the targeted content standard. Step 2. Determine which aspects of the standard can be measured objectively. Step 3. Select the focused aspect and determine the cognitive demand reflected in the standard’s description. Step 4. Create a question (stem), one (1) correct answer, and plausible (realistic) distractors. Step 5. Review the item and answer options for grammatical soundness. 13
  • 14. QA Checklist: MC Items  Presents a definite, explicit, and singular question, which is worded positively.  Contains only one (1) correct answer, with each distractor being plausible and/or representing common misconceptions.  Consists of answer options being of similar length, structure, and format.  Places charts, tables, graphs, and/or images within the item.  Uses consistent grammar among the question (stem) and answer options.  Avoids multiple answer options, such as “All of the above.”, “None of the above.”, and “Both A and B are correct.”  Arranges answer options in logical order when applicable, such as numeric or chronological order.  Avoids repeating the same words or phrases in each of the answer option. 14
  • 15. Constructed Response (CR) -General Guidelines Use developmentally appropriate language for students.  Make student expectations clear. • “Explain” vs. “Discuss” • “Describe” vs. “Comment”  State the extent of the expected answer. • “Give three reasons” vs. “Give some reasons”  Create well developed scoring criteria or a rubric for each task. 15
  • 16. CR Guidelines (cont.) Short Answer (SA) tasks • Solve in one step • Require a brief response (2-5 minutes) • Worth up to three (3) points Extended Answer (EA) items/tasks • Solve using multiple steps • Require 5-10 minutes to answer • Worth four (4) or more points 16
  • 17. CR Guidelines (cont.)  Extended • • • • • Performance (EP) Tasks Align multiple tasks to several content standards. Administer over an extended time period. Serve as a culminating event or project (e.g., final portfolio, performance, or project). Require high levels of cognitive demand (e.g., Level 4). Use in conjunction with “on-demand” items/tasks (e.g., MC, SA, EA) at key phases/milestones. 17
  • 18. SA-Example DIRECTIONS: Read the following information about the rainforest. Use the information to help you answer Question 2 in the space provided. This question is worth two (2) points towards your overall score. In the Rainforest Life in the rainforest is wet and wild. Rainforests are jungle areas that have a large amount of rainfall each year. Rainforests cover a small part of this earth. They are home to over half of the different types of animals and plants. Rainforests are not only beautiful, but also very important to people. We get food from the rainforest such as chocolate and cinnamon. Rainforests also have ingredients for many medicines. Even though rainforests are important, many are being cut down. Many people are working to make sure that the rainforests are saved because we will need them in the future. 2. In two complete sentences, explain why people should help save the rainforests. ________________________________________________________________________ 18 ________________________________________________________________________ (0002.SCI.GR5.POST.SA-LV2-STD2.2A)
  • 19. Procedural Steps: SA Tasks Step 1. Review the targeted content standard(s). Step 2. Determine which aspects of the standard(s) can be best measured by having students “construct” a short response. Step 3. Select and list aspects of the targeted content standard(s) to be measured. Step 4. Create a prompt, select a passage, or develop a scenario for students. Step 5. Develop a clear statement that articulates specific criteria for the test-taker to provide. 19
  • 20. QA Checklist: SA Tasks  Presents a prompt, scenario, or passage using contentspecific terminology, along with developmentally appropriate references.  Ensures the prompt, passage, or scenario is concise, free of jargon, and grammatically correct.  Uses appropriate verbs to communicate expectations.  Articulates response instructions using a clear sentence structure.  Communicates in clear, unambiguous terms the extent of the expected answer. 20
  • 21. EA Task- Example DIRECTIONS: For Question 3, read the following scenario and construct a response to both Parts A and B. Parts A and B are worth four (4) points each, for a total of 8 points towards your overall score. Scenario #1-You are catering a large dinner for 60 people in which chicken and beef will be served along with sautéed green beans in a light cream sauce. Fresh strawberries and ice cream will be offered as desert. There is limited counter space for food preparation and the hot water is only reaching a temperature of 70o F. 3. In a short paragraph (no more than 4 sentences), respond to both Part A and B on a separate piece of paper. Part A: List and explain at least three (3) safety conditions that need to be addressed to prevent food contamination. Part B: Given the cooking area constraints, develop two (2) alternative courses of action that will result in an on-time meal delivery. (0003.FCS.NCIII.EA-LV3-FNW1.4) 21
  • 22. Procedural Steps: EA Tasks Step 1. Review the targeted content standard(s). Step 2. Determine which aspects of the standard(s) can be best measured by having students “construct” an extended response to a given prompt, scenario, or passage. Step 3. Select and list aspects of the targeted content standard(s) to be measured. Step 4. Create a prompt, select a passage, or develop a scenario for students. Step 5. Develop a clear statement for each subordinate task that articulates specific criteria for the test-taker to provide. 22
  • 23. QA Checklist: EA Tasks  Presents a prompt, scenario, or passage using content-specific terminology, along with developmentally appropriate references.  Aligns the prompt, scenario, passage and test-taker response requirements with the targeted content standard(s) identified in the test blueprint.  Uses appropriate verbs to communicate expectation.  Communicates in clear, unambiguous terms the extent of the expected response.  Ensures non-content specific behaviors (e.g., attitude, motivational levels, engagement, attendance, etc.) are not articulated in either the response criteria or scoring rubric. 23
  • 24. Extended Performance (EP) Task Example DIRECTIONS FOR TASK 1 of 3: For Task #1, create a mood portrait and collage. You will have one (1) week to complete this task. This task is worth twelve (12) points towards your overall score. Task #1-Using what you know about the Elements of Art and the Principles of Design create both a mood portrait of yourself and a collage. Think about the concepts we studied in class and the different ways artists have created works of art that have focused on people’s faces. Use paint and color mixing techniques to create a mood portrait of yourself and construct a collage on which to place your portrait. Use the scoring rubric to guide your art work development. CriteriaA. Create a mood portrait of yourself showing proportional breakdowns of facial features. B. Construct a collage using monochromatic or analogous color schemes and transfer your drawing on to the collage. 24 (0001.VPA.ART5.EP-LV4-1.1 & 1.2)
  • 25. Procedural Steps: EP Tasks Step 1. Review the targeted content standard(s). Step 2. Determine which aspects of the standard(s) can be best measured by having students “develop” a complex response, demonstration, or performance over an extend period of time (e.g., two weeks). Step 3. Select and list all aspects of the targeted content standard(s) to be measured. Step 4. Create a project, portfolio, or demonstration expectation statement that includes subordinate tasks, which are aligned to the test blueprint. Step 5. Develop a clear statement for each subordinate task that articulates specific criteria for the test-taker to provide. 25
  • 26. QA Checklist: EP Tasks  Presents project, portfolio, or demonstration using contentspecific terminology, along with developmentally appropriate references.  Aligns the project, portfolio, or demonstration and test-taker response requirements with the targeted content standards identified in the test blueprint.  Uses appropriate verbs to communicate expectation.  Communicates in clear, unambiguous terms the extent of the expected answer.  Ensures non-content specific behaviors (e.g., attitude, motivational levels, engagement, attendance, etc.) are not articulated in either the response criteria or scoring rubric. 26
  • 27. STEP 5 Scoring Keys and Rubrics 27
  • 28. Scoring Keys: MC Items  Ensure that each item has a single, correct answer.  Avoid errors by validating answers after the key is developed.  Validate answers prior to form review.  Revalidate answers to any changed item. 28
  • 29. Scoring Key: MC Example Scoring Key Assessment Name Grade/Course Administration Total Possible Points Social Studies Final Elementary Social Studies-Grade 4 Post-test 50 Item # Item Tag Item Type Point Value Answer 1 0001.SOS.GR4.POST.MC-LV1-GEO2.1 MC 1 B 2 0002.SOS.GR4.POST.MC-LV1-GEO2.4 MC 1 A 29
  • 30. Procedural Steps: MC Items Step 1. Enter the assessment information at the top of the Scoring Key. Step 2. Record the item number, item tag (optional), item type, and point value. Step 3. Record the MC answers in the Answer column. Step 4. Repeat steps 1-4 until all items on the test blueprint are reflected within the Scoring Key. Step 5. Validate that each question-to-answer relationship is recorded correctly. 30
  • 31. QA Checklist: MC Items  All items articulated on the test specifications are represented within the Scoring Key.  All items have been validated to ensure only one correct answer exists among the possible answer options.  Answers do not create a discernible pattern.  Answers are “balanced” among the possible options.  Answers are revalidated after the assessment reviews are complete. 31
  • 32. Rubric Development  Assign point values for different levels of performance.  Describe the performance continuum using content-based language.  Ensure that language is clear and concise.  Determine the appropriate rubric type: • Single dimension vs. multi-dimensional • Holistic vs. analytic 32
  • 33. Holistic vs. Analytic Scoring Rubrics Holistic • Provides a single score based on an overall determination of the test-taker’s performance. • Assesses the concept in its totality. • Difficult to establish scorer consistency (i.e., inter-rater agreement). Analytic • Identifies and assesses specific aspects of a response. • Assigns a score to each dimension. • Combines dimension scores to produce an overall score. 33
  • 34. Single vs. Multi-dimensional Scoring Rubrics Single • Aligns to a specific content standard. • Reflects a limited point range of the performance continuum. • Best suited for on-demand tasks. • Easiest to maintain scorer consistency. Multi • Aligns with several content standards. • Assigns scores to each dimension. • Best suited for a culminating event over time (e.g., science project). • Hardest to maintain scorer consistency. 34
  • 35. Rubric Construction  Use clear, concise, and objective language so scorers would assign exact/adjacent scores to the performance being evaluated. • Describe whether spelling and/or grammar will impact the final score. • Avoid using words like “many”, “some”, and “few” without adding numeric descriptors to quantify these terms. • Avoid using subjective words such, as “creativity” or “effort”. • Avoid subjective adjectives such as “excellent” or “inadequate”.  Create content-based descriptions of the expected answer for each level of performance on the rubric.  Provide an example of a complete, correct response.  Reference the targeted content standards in multi-dimensional rubrics. 35
  • 36. Scoring Rubric: SA Single Dimension-Example Sample Response for: “In two complete sentences, explain why people should help save the rainforests.” 2 points The student’s response is written in complete sentences and contains two valid reasons for saving the rainforest. “People must save the rainforest to save the animals’ homes. People need to save the rainforest because we get ingredients for many medicines from there.” 1 point The student’s response contains only one reason. “People should save the rainforest because it is important and because people and animals need it.” 0 points There is no response, or the response is completely incorrect or irrelevant. 36
  • 37. Scoring Rubric: EA Single Dimension-Example Sample Response for: “List the steps of the Scientific Method. Briefly explain each one.” 4 points 3 points 2 points 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Ask a Question- Ask a question about something that you observe: How, What, When, Who, Which, Why, or Where? Do Background Research- Use library and Internet research to help you find the best way to do things. Construct a Hypothesis- Make an educated guess about how things work. Test Your Hypothesis- Do an experiment. Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion- Collect your measurements and analyze them to see if your hypothesis is true or false. Communicate Your Results- Publish a final report in a scientific journal or by presenting the results on a poster. Ask a Question Do Background Research-Use library and Internet research. Construct a Hypothesis- An educated guess about how things work. Test Your Hypothesis- Do an experiment. Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion Communicate Your Results Ask a Question Do Background Research Construct a Hypothesis Test Your Hypothesis Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion Communicate Your Results 1 point Ask a Question, Hypothesis, Do an Experiment, Analyze Your Data 0 points “I don’t know.” 37
  • 38. Scoring Rubric: EP Multi-Dimension-Example Dimension Advanced (4 pts.) Proficient (3 pts.) Basic (2 pts.) Below Basic (1 pt.) Art Elements and Principles - Sketch a Face The drawing of the face shows a breakdown of the proportions of the facial features with a lot of attention paid to details, such as strands of hair, details in eyes. The facial expression establishes a mood. The drawing of the face shows a breakdown of the face with facial features placed in proportion to one another. The portrait lacks facial expression, thus no mood is shown in the drawing. The drawing of the face shows some breakdown of the face but following through with other visual cues, such as eyebrows lining up with tops of the ears, are not evident. No attention is paid to facial expression to establish mood. The drawing of the face is not broken down into proportional segments, so the placement of the facial features is random and abstracts the realism of the portrait. No attention is paid to details, such as strands of hair, eyebrows, eyelashes, etc. Art Elements and Principles - Color Scheme Background collage uses either a monochromatic or analogous color scheme with all ends of the pictures glued down. The arrangement of the collage is unique using either space of transition of color in a planned way. The color mixing and transition of the paint in the portrait shows a broad range of tones, and the application contours the shape of the face. Portrait and background show a full understanding of monochromatic and analogous color schemes. Paint mixing is gradual using a range of hues that have more than eight tones, and the tones are applied enhancing the contour and roundness of the face. Background collage uses either a monochromatic or analogous color scheme with some ends of the pictures sticking up or small portions of the oak tag showing through. The color mixing with the paint in the portrait shows a range of either a monochromatic or analogous color scheme, but no awareness of contour color application. Background collage has at least 60% of the paper fitting into either a monochromatic or analogous color scheme. Color mixing in the portrait is blotchy and not blended well; each color is separate with no attempt to transition one color to the next. Background collage and color mixing show no identification to either a monochromatic or an analogous color scheme. Portrait and background show understanding of monochromatic and analogous color schemes. Some edges of the collage are not glued down. The color portrait is painted with a range of six or more hues of a monochromatic or analogous color scheme. The transitions of color are smooth and gradual. Portrait and background show some understanding of monochromatic and analogous color schemes with only one or two colors that do not fit into the selected schemes. Half of the color mixing with paint shows 38 gradual transitions of color. Portrait and background show no knowledge of monochromatic or analogous color schemes. There is no range of color mixing within either color scheme with no gradual transitions of color. Art Elements and Principles Point of View - Original Work
  • 39. Procedural Steps: Scoring Rubrics Step 1. Review the SA, EA, or EP task and the criteria articulated in the stem/directions. Step 2. Select a “generic” rubric structure (see Template #2: Building the Assessment) based upon (a) scoring criteria, and (b) the number of dimensions being measured. Step 3. Modify the rubric language using specific criteria expected in the response to award the maximum number of points. Step 4. Determine how much the response can deviate from “fully correct” in order to earn the next (lower) point value. [Continue until the full range of possible scores is described.] Step 5. During the review, ensure the response expectation, scoring rubric, and test blueprint are fully aligned. 39
  • 40. QA Checklist: Scoring Rubrics  Scoring rubrics must:  reflect a performance continuum;  be clear and concise; and,  include all dimensions (components) of the task.  Sample expectations are used to provide a guide as to what demonstrates a “fully complete” response.  Avoid including non-cognitive attributes (e.g., motivation, timeliness, etc.). 40
  • 42. Test Form  Provides content-based questions and/or tasks.  Displays the sequence of items, prompts, and tasks the test-taker is to respond to during the testing period.  Includes administration guidelines.  May also include scoring rubrics for students to refer to when responding to EP tasks. 42
  • 43. Test Form Development Administration Guidelines…  Contain three (3) sets of standardized directions: • Preparation: Details the steps required prior to administration (accessing test materials, make-up process). • Administration: Details the steps required during administration (administrator scripts, test directions). • After Testing: Details the steps required after administration (scoring instructions, test security).  Specify materials, administration procedures, approved test accommodations, and detailed scoring directions.  Provide directions for maintaining the security of testing materials. 43
  • 44. Test Form Development (cont.) Item/Task Organization…  Place item/tasks in a logical sequence.  Ensure sufficient spacing among items, tasks, directions, answer options, response areas, etc.  Keep stimuli and questions on the same page.  Maintain similar “style” in how information is presented to test takers.  For EP tasks, include a timeline for each completion of each subtask, along with the date the final project will be scored. 44
  • 45. Procedural Steps: Administration Step 1. Create a series of administrative steps for before, during, and after the assessment window. Step 2. Explain any requirements or equipment necessary, including accommodations. State any ancillary materials (e.g., calculators needed or allowed by the test-takers. Step 3. Identify the approximate time afforded to complete the assessment, including each subtask in an EP task. Step 4. Include detailed “scripts” articulating exactly what is to be communicated to the students, especially when administering performance tasks over a long period of time. Step 5. Include procedures for scoring, administering make-ups, and handling completed assessments. 45
  • 46. QA Checklist: Administration  Guidelines explain administrative steps before, during, and after the assessment window.  Guidelines articulate the step-by-step procedures during each phase of administration.  Requirements for completing the performance measure items/tasks, including accommodations, equipment, and material are included.  Approximate time needed to complete the overall performance measure is provided.  Detailed “scripts” articulate the information to be communicated in a standardized manner. 46
  • 47. Procedural Steps: Test Form Step 1. Develop a cover page stating the test form developed and include any necessary demographic information (e.g., section number, student name, date administered, etc.). Step 2. Organize the items/tasks/prompts in a sequence that will maximize student engagement. Step 3. Add item tags and section dividers (optional). Step 4. Refine the draft form to minimize “blank space”, verify picture, graph, table, and figure placement in relationship to the item/task, and ensure MC answer options do not drift from one page to the next. Step 5. Add scoring rubric or criteria for constructed response tasks. 47
  • 48. QA Checklist: Test Form  Directions state what to do, where and how to respond, and the point value for items/tasks.  Items/tasks/prompts on the test form reflect the blueprint.  Form layout minimizes “white space”, “drift” “crowding of items”, and distance from stem to response options/placement.  Forms are free from unclear, small, or unnecessary images, figures, charts, or graphs. 48
  • 49. Reflection • Items/Tasks Step 5 • Test Forms • Scoring Keys & Rubrics Step 4 Step 6 49
  • 50. Final Check Performance Measure Rubric  Strand 2 evaluates six (6) aspects presented within this module. Each aspect is rated using the following scale: • 1 – Fully addressed • .5 – Partially addressed • 0 – Not addressed • N/A – Not applicable Note: The Performance Measure Rubric is found within the “Stuff” folder within this module and in the “Template” folder of the Review module. 50
  • 51. Final Check Performance Measure Rubric Strand 2 Task ID 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Descriptor Items/tasks and score keys are developed using standardized procedures, including scoring rubrics for human-scored, open-ended questions (e.g., short constructed response, writing prompts, performance tasks, etc.). Item/tasks are created and reviewed in terms of: (a) alignment to the targeted content standards, (b) content accuracy, (c) developmental appropriateness, (d) cognitive demand, and (e) bias, sensitivity, and fairness. Administrative guidelines are developed that contain the step-by-step procedures used to administer the performance measure in a consistent manner, including scripts to orally communicate directions to students, day and time constraints, and allowable accommodations/adaptations. Scoring guidelines are developed for human-scored items/tasks to promote score consistency across items/tasks and among different scorers. These guidelines articulate point values for each item/task used to combine results into an overall score. Summary scores are reported using both raw score points and performance level. Performance levels reflect the range of scores possible on the assessment and use terms or symbols to denote each level. The total time to administer the performance measure is developmentally appropriate for the test-taker. Generally, this is 30 minutes or less for young students and up to 60 minutes per 51 session for older students (high school). Rating
  • 52. Summary & Next Steps Summary  Developed items/tasks to measure specific components of the targeted content standards, objective scoring keys/rubrics, and the completed assessment form along with Administration Guidelines. Next Steps Module 3: Reviewing the Assessment  Conduct quality reviews of the assessment form including items/tasks, scoring key/rubrics, and administration guidelines. 52