CloudComputing      Hosting Service
•    –•    –•    –    –
•    –•    –•    –    –
•           クラウドは人生(キリッ    –        •        •        •    –        •        •    –        •
•    –        •    –        •    –        •    –        •            –        •    –        •        •        •
•    –
Cloud
•    –    –•
•                                                            May 1964         “ Barring unforeseen obstacles, an on-line i...
Google先⽣⽈く、G   l 先⽣⽈く
何かが違う…(;^ω^)何かが違う ( ^ ^)
•    –    –•    –
•    –    –•    –
•    –    –•    –
•    –•    –    –
•    –    –•    –    –    –    –
•    –•    –•    –•    –•    –
•    –•    –•    –•    –•    –
•
•
•••••
•    –•    –•    –
•    –•    –•    –
•    –•    –•    –
••    –    –•    –    –•
ガートナー | プレス・リリース | ガートナー、「先進テクノロジのハイプ・サイクル:2008年」を発表http://www.gartner.co.jp/press/html/pr20080827‐01.html より引用
ガートナー | プレス・リリース | ガートナー、「先進テクノロジのハイプ・サイクル:2011年」を発表 市場を変革する可能性のあるテクノロジの成熟度を分析http://www.gartner.co.jp/press/html/pr201109...
•    –•    –    –•    –    –    –
•    –•    –    –•    –    –    –
••••    –
•
•    ••    ••    ••    ••    ••    ••    •
•    ••    ••    ••    •••••    ••
78.0%   78.2%                                                                                       75.3%                 ...
78.0%   78.2%                                                                                       75.3%                 ...
•    –    –•    –        •        •        •        •        •
•    –    –•    –        •        •    –        •        •
•    –    –•    –    –
•    –    –•    –    –
•    –•
••
••
•    –•    –•    –
IaaS•      •••      •••      ••      ••      •
•
•••
•    –    –•    –    –•    –•    –
•    –    –•    –    –    –
•    –    –    –•    –    –
•    –    –•    –    –•    –    –
•    ‐ 会員数10万人(2011年9)    ‐ サイザックス株式会社      http://zzyzx.co.jp/
•    ‐ 会員数10万人(2011年9)    ‐ サイザックス株式会社      http://zzyzx.co.jp/
•    ‐ 会員数10万人(2011年9)    ‐ サイザックス株式会社      http://zzyzx.co.jp/
Throughput   463 287             463.287    MB/sec    1 clients    1   procs   max_latency=3.968                          ...
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client4592 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput /fioa/tmp//clients/cl...
[3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client4592 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput /fioa/tmp//clients/cl...
•    –    –    –•    –    –    –•    –•    –
•••••
•
••••
•    –    –    –•    –•    –    –•    –
•    –    –•    –        •    –        •    –•    –    –
•  2010 11  2010.11        2011 03                 2011.03             09                  11           12                ...
••
•    –•    –    –•    –    –
•    –•    –•    –
•    –•    –•    –
••    –        •        •        ••    –•
•    –    –    –        •        •        •
•    –        •    –    –    –        •        ••
•
•    –•    –•
•••
••••
••    –    –        •        •        •
•••••••••
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution
Próxima SlideShare
Cargando en…5
×

The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution

3.986 visualizaciones

Publicado el

クラウド・コンピューティング時代の 生存戦略 ~ ホスティング・サービスがこの先生きのこるには ~ #osc11tk
1.クラウドコンピューティング
2. ホスティングサービスとは何だったのか
3. 次世代ホスティング。この先生きのこるために。

Publicado en: Tecnología, Empresariales
0 comentarios
3 recomendaciones
Estadísticas
Notas
  • Sé el primero en comentar

Sin descargas
Visualizaciones
Visualizaciones totales
3.986
En SlideShare
0
De insertados
0
Número de insertados
577
Acciones
Compartido
0
Descargas
40
Comentarios
0
Recomendaciones
3
Insertados 0
No insertados

No hay notas en la diapositiva.

The survival strategy of the cloud computing era 2011 1119 zem_distribution

  1. 1. CloudComputing Hosting Service
  2. 2. • –• –• – –
  3. 3. • –• –• – –
  4. 4. • クラウドは人生(キリッ – • • • – • • – •
  5. 5. • – • – • – • – • – • – • • •
  6. 6. • –
  7. 7. Cloud
  8. 8. • – –•
  9. 9. • May 1964 “ Barring unforeseen obstacles, an on-line interactive computer service, provided commercially by an information utility, may be as commonplace by 2000 AD as telephone service i today.” l h i is d ”The Computers of Tomorrow by Martin Greenbergerhttp://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/unbound/flashbks/computer/greenbf.htm
  10. 10. Google先⽣⽈く、G l 先⽣⽈く
  11. 11. 何かが違う…(;^ω^)何かが違う ( ^ ^)
  12. 12. • – –• –
  13. 13. • – –• –
  14. 14. • – –• –
  15. 15. • –• – –
  16. 16. • – –• – – – –
  17. 17. • –• –• –• –• –
  18. 18. • –• –• –• –• –
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21. •••••
  22. 22. • –• –• –
  23. 23. • –• –• –
  24. 24. • –• –• –
  25. 25. •• – –• – –•
  26. 26. ガートナー | プレス・リリース | ガートナー、「先進テクノロジのハイプ・サイクル:2008年」を発表http://www.gartner.co.jp/press/html/pr20080827‐01.html より引用
  27. 27. ガートナー | プレス・リリース | ガートナー、「先進テクノロジのハイプ・サイクル:2011年」を発表 市場を変革する可能性のあるテクノロジの成熟度を分析http://www.gartner.co.jp/press/html/pr20110907‐01.html より引用
  28. 28. • –• – –• – – –
  29. 29. • –• – –• – – –
  30. 30. •••• –
  31. 31.
  32. 32. • •• •• •• •• •• •• •
  33. 33. • •• •• •• ••••• ••
  34. 34. 78.0% 78.2% 75.3% 72.6% 73.0% 70.8% 66.0% 64.3% 57.8% 46.3% 37.1% 21.4% 13.4%9.2%
  35. 35. 78.0% 78.2% 75.3% 72.6% 73.0% 70.8% 66.0% 64.3% 57.8% 46.3% 37.1% 21.4% 13.4%9.2%
  36. 36. • – –• – • • • • •
  37. 37. • – –• – • • – • •
  38. 38. • – –• – –
  39. 39. • – –• – –
  40. 40. • –•
  41. 41. ••
  42. 42. ••
  43. 43. • –• –• –
  44. 44. IaaS• ••• ••• •• •• •
  45. 45.
  46. 46. •••
  47. 47. • – –• – –• –• –
  48. 48. • – –• – – –
  49. 49. • – – –• – –
  50. 50. • – –• – –• – –
  51. 51. • ‐ 会員数10万人(2011年9) ‐ サイザックス株式会社 http://zzyzx.co.jp/
  52. 52. • ‐ 会員数10万人(2011年9) ‐ サイザックス株式会社 http://zzyzx.co.jp/
  53. 53. • ‐ 会員数10万人(2011年9) ‐ サイザックス株式会社 http://zzyzx.co.jp/
  54. 54. Throughput 463 287 463.287 MB/sec 1 clients 1 procs max_latency=3.968 max latency=3 968 msThroughput 789.003 MB/sec 2 clients 2 procs max_latency=4.765 msThroughput 1304.08 MB/sec 4 clients 4 procs max_latency=5.390 msThroughput 1939 43 1939.43 MB/sec 8 clients 8 procs max_latency=4.479 max latency=4 479 msThroughput 2534.71 MB/sec 16 clients 16 procs max_latency=12.107 msThroughput 2541.42 MB/sec 32 clients 32 procs max_latency=10.461 msThroughput 1877.46 MB/sec 64 clients 64 procs max_latency 16.700 max latency=16.700 msThroughput 1716.98 MB/sec 128 clients 128 procs max_latency=278.057 msThroughput 1727.13 MB/sec 256 clients 256 procs max_latency=301.766 ms g pThroughput 1517.07 MB/sec 512 clients 512 / p procs max_latency=376.031 ms yThroughput 1252.7 MB/sec 1024 clients 1024 procs max_latency=907.610 msThroughput 722.169 MB/sec 2048 clients 2048 procs max_latency=14085.365 msThroughput 730.51 MB/sec 4096 clients 4096 procs max_latency=26752.568 ms
  55. 55. [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client4592 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput /fioa/tmp//clients/client6026 failed for handle 16385 (No such file latency=3 968 ms [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6026 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory) [3] open 463 287 MB/sec 463.287 1 clients 1 procs max or directory) max_latency=3.968 [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6482 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput 789.003 MB/sec 2 clients 2 procs max_latency=4.765 ms [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client5040 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput 1304.08 MB/sec 4 clients 4 procs max_latency=5.390 ms [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6965 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput /fi /t 43 li t / li t5044 f clients dl 16385 (N [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client5044 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory) 479 ms [3] 1939 // MB/sec 1939.43 8 il d f h 8 procs max latency=4 max_latency=4.479 h fil di t )Throughput 2534.71 MB/sec 16 clients 16 procs max_latency=12.107 ms [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6055 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput 2541.42 MB/sec 32 clients 32 procs max_latency=10.461 ms [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client4909 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory) p pThroughput 1877.46 MB/sec 64 clients ( max_latency y) [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6713 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory) 64 procs max latency=16.700 ms 16.700 [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client5014 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput 1716.98 MB/sec 128 clients 128 procs max_latency=278.057 ms [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client4971 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput 1727.13 MB/sec 256 clients 256 procs max_latency=301.766 ms [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6221 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput /fioa/tmp//clients/client5207 failed for handle 16385 (No such file latency=376.031 ms [3] open 1517.07 MB/sec g p / 512 clients 512 procs max_ or directory) p y [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client5207 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput 1252.7 MB/sec 1024 clients 1024 procs max_latency=907.610 ms [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client4139 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput 722.169 MB/sec 2048 clients 2048 procs max_latency=14085.365 msThroughput 730.51 MB/sec 4096 clients 4096 procs max_latency=26752.568 ms # uptime p 19:24:07 up 7 days,  5:46,  2 users,  load average: 1543.52, 5862.79, 7304.55
  56. 56. [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client4592 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput /fioa/tmp//clients/client6026 failed for handle 16385 (No such file latency=3 968 ms [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6026 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory) [3] open 463 287 MB/sec 463.287 1 clients 1 procs max or directory) max_latency=3.968 [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6482 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput 789.003 MB/sec 2 clients 2 procs max_latency=4.765 ms [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client5040 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput 1304.08 MB/sec 4 clients 4 procs max_latency=5.390 ms [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6965 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput /fi /t 43 li t / li t5044 f clients dl 16385 (N [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client5044 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory) 479 ms [3] 1939 // MB/sec 1939.43 8 il d f h 8 procs max latency=4 max_latency=4.479 h fil di t )Throughput 2534.71 MB/sec 16 clients 16 procs max_latency=12.107 ms [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6055 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput 2541.42 MB/sec 32 clients 32 procs max_latency=10.461 ms [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client4909 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory) p pThroughput 1877.46 MB/sec 64 clients ( max_latency y) [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6713 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory) 64 procs max latency=16.700 ms 16.700 [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client5014 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput 1716.98 MB/sec 128 clients 128 procs max_latency=278.057 ms [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client4971 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput 1727.13 MB/sec 256 clients 256 procs max_latency=301.766 ms [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client6221 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput /fioa/tmp//clients/client5207 failed for handle 16385 (No such file latency=376.031 ms [3] open 1517.07 MB/sec g p / 512 clients 512 procs max_ or directory) p y [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client5207 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput 1252.7 MB/sec 1024 clients 1024 procs max_latency=907.610 ms [3] open /fioa/tmp//clients/client4139 failed for handle 16385 (No such file or directory)Throughput 722.169 MB/sec 2048 clients 2048 procs max_latency=14085.365 msThroughput 730.51 MB/sec 4096 clients 4096 procs max_latency=26752.568 ms # uptime p 19:24:07 up 7 days,  5:46,  2 users,  load average: 1543.52, 5862.79, 7304.55
  57. 57. • – – –• – – –• –• –
  58. 58. •••••
  59. 59.
  60. 60. ••••
  61. 61. • – – –• –• – –• –
  62. 62. • – –• – • – • –• – –
  63. 63. • 2010 11 2010.11 2011 03 2011.03 09 11 12 09                  11           12 ?2010 2011 2012 Service Released Log Storage (KVS) Analytics L St (KVS) HDD Master Store ( Hadoop relation? ) Image Sto rage (KVS)  Image Sto`rage (KVS) Next Generation  Okuyama Memory Cache Function (KVS) Monitoring System ( RTIME ) ( RTIME )
  64. 64. ••
  65. 65. • –• – –• – –
  66. 66. • –• –• –
  67. 67. • –• –• –
  68. 68. •• – • • •• –•
  69. 69. • – – – • • •
  70. 70. • – • – – – • ••
  71. 71.
  72. 72. • –• –•
  73. 73. •••
  74. 74. ••••
  75. 75. •• – – • • •
  76. 76. •••••••••

×