The document summarizes the results of the CCI Mainstreaming Challenge, an ideation activity held by CCI from June 8th to 23rd. Over 100 people were invited to participate and generated 22 ideas, 96 comments, and 103 votes on ideas to help advance CCI's work. The top ideas focused on utilizing the NBN, developing web applications and repositories, expanding CCI's consulting services, strengthening academic activities, improving CCI's online presence and media training, and establishing long-term strategic positioning. Next steps discussed forming task forces to further develop the top ideas.

1. CCI Mainstreaming Challenge Overview of results Kate Morrison, Vulture Street July 3rd 2009

3. 112 invited to participate

4. researchers + Advisory Board + 14 externals

5. 31.25% contributed ideas, comments & votes

7. 88% of written contributions (ideas & comments) from internal CCI participants

8. Of participants >50% only commented or voted

9. over 11% only voted, 40% only commented

11. Votes over time Mid-point reminder sent

12. Top 9 ideas by popularity (ascending)

13. Top 9 ideas by popularity (ascending)

14. Top 9 ideas by popularity (ascending)

15. Congratulations Phil

16. Most ‘active’ not necessarily most popular

19. Themes for moving forward House in order: website, media training NBN Consulting Academic: journals/ teaching/ conferences Long term positioning Web applications/ repositories/ tools

22. Australian Culture Online (Brian Fitzgerald)

23. Wikimedia/pedia(John Quiggin)

25. Specialist 1-2 year participant funded forums (John Howkins)

26. Short courses (John Banks)

28. Standardise teaching materials/case studies for business schools (CHP)

31. The next stage of innovation research, thinking and policy (Stuart Cunningham)

32. Inter-disciplinary knowledge advancement (Rachel Parker)

33. Creative Industries ministerial responsibility (Ellissa Nolan)

34. Harnessing the creative arts to the innovation agenda (Lelia Green)

35. Join CSIRO (Jason Potts)

38. Taskforces?

39. Scoping studies?

41. Evidence of ‘group think’?