The document discusses strategies used by IITA to address virus threats to food crops in sub-Saharan Africa. It focuses on cassava, describing efforts to characterize cassava mosaic viruses, understand their diversity and epidemiology. This includes tracking the spread of the recombinant EACMV-UG virus across countries. Research is also presented on developing diagnostic tools and investigating host resistance and alternative virus hosts. The approach involves interdisciplinary collaboration between virology, plant breeding, biotechnology and other fields.
Winning against virus threats to African food crops
1. Winning the race against virus threats to
food crops in sub-Saharan Africa:
What we do and how we do it!
A review from August 2007
P Lava Kumar
Contract Review Seminar, 12 April 2010 www.iita.org
2. Outline
1. Introduction: The challenges
2. What we do and how we do it!
• Clonal crops
• Seed crops
• Germplasm health and quarantine
• Diagnostics
• Capacity building
3. Future plan
Stay fit and competitive
4. Conclusions
www.iita.org
4. Food security and poverty reduction
through agriculture development
• 10% increase in agriculture productivity in Africa is associated
with 7.2% decrease in poverty (IFPRI 2004).
N = 327.2 million t
76% IITA crops 6%
35 7% 140
Production, tonnes (x 1 000,000)
1 1 8% 37%
30 2 120
cassava
Area, ha (x 1 000,000)
25 11% 100
musa
20 80
15 2 3
yam
15%
16%
3 60
maize
10
4 5 4 40
4 6 7 6
7
5 20
0 0
Maize Sorghum Cassava Rice Wheat Musa Yams
www.iita.org
5. Virus diseases
•Cause yield and quality loses
•Losses are often insidious.
Frequently less conspicuous and
go unnoticed or untreated.
Direct and indirect losses:
•Reduction in growth
•Reduction in vigor
•Reduction in quality & market value
•Reduction in transboundary trade
•Costs of maintaining health
• MSV: $180 million to $480 million at
5% annual incidence
• CMD: 42% yield reduction in
EACMV-UG affected region
• CBSD: $100 million in 2003
www.iita.org
6. Drivers of virus spread/evolution
Agriculture intensification
• Raising population demand on food production
• Rapid expansion in area
• New crops & varieties, continuous cultivation (absence of breaks)
Effects of Global Warming Effects of climate variability / change
• Distribution of pests and diseases
• Changes in geographical
distribution of hosts and pathogens
• Altering crop yields and losses due
to changes in efficacy of
management strategies
Source: Nature Vol 438, No. 7066
www.iita.org
7. Viruses are built to win?
• Intracellular pathogens, completely dependent on hosts.
• Difficult to eliminate them, without eliminating the host
• Do viruses are there to protect hosts from invasive plants?
• For instance virus resistance in wild relatives / landraces and susceptibility
of introduced species supports this thought.
(new encounter diseases of introduced crops)
CMD in cassava
MSV in maize
CSSV in cocoa
Rosette of groundnut
• New paradigm - Viruses are evolutionary drivers
• There is little choice for host and virus – either they
Source:Wiki
adjust or both will perish Virus
• Why is it important here?
•Viruses have mechanisms to negate preventive tactics
www.iita.org
8. • Diverse crops
• Diverse viruses
• Diverse vectors
• Diverse modes of virus spread &
• Diverse agro-ecologies
www.iita.org
10. Diverse vectors and modes of dissemination
Whiteflies Aphids
Beetles Thrips
Leafhoppers Mealybugs
www.iita.org
11. Ecological diversity:
Clonal and seed crops
Viruses of clonal crops –STATIC Viruses of seed crops - DYNAMIC
• Infected clones retain viruses • Only seed-transmitted viruses are
indefinitely (What goes in stays retained and passed to next
forever!). generation.
• Increase in incidence incrementally • Incidence depends on the vectors
Reduction depends on the and virus sources (seed-borne /
replacement of infected stocks. volunteer plants / alternative hosts).
Conditions favoring insects favor
high incidence
• In general viruses have narrow host
range. • In general, broad host range
• Predictable annual situation. • Unpredictable annual situation.
Different viruses – crops demands different tactics
www.iita.org
13. What we do?
Strategic Objectives
1. Understand the foe
2. Develop tools to monitor them
3. Establish technologies to prevent viruses (win over the virus)
4. Disseminate the technologies
Characterize viruses Develop serological and nucleic acid-
(Biological and biochemical) based diagnostic tools
Fundamental and applied
Study virus-vector interactions and virology research for Ensure germplasm health safety and
disease epidemiology mitigating the impact of virus quarantine monitoring
diseases
Develop disease control options, Knowledge and technology transfer
including resistant varieties to stakeholders
www.iita.org
14. What we do?
Ways to win the race
Plant Health Monitoring Breeding Programs
Virus-free stocks
All All
Exclusion Prevention
(Cassava & banana)
Quarantine & Inspection Cultivation of resistant
varieties
Breeding programs
(From countries)
Planting virus free material Conventionally bread /
IPM / IDM
transgenics
Reduce spread
Methods to reduce Reduce impact
All
Vector control
impact of virus Cultivation of
Physical barriers
tolerant varieties
Seed testing infections
Avoidance by cultural
methods Reduce sources of inoculum
Field isolation Eliminate crop refuge,
Plant spacing / alternative alternate sources
dates
Not effective in SSA www.iita.org
17. Crop specific activities
Cassava
Cassava mosaic begomoviruses & brown streak Maize
•Epidemiology Maize streak virus
•Virus diversity and diagnostics • Host resistance
•Host resistance and seed systems
•Whitefly control Cowpea & soybean
Bean pod mottle virus
Yam Blackeye cowpea mosaic virus
Yam potyvirus & badnavirus complex Cowpea mottle virus
•Epidemiology Cowpea mild mottle virus
•Virus diversity and diagnostics Cowpea yellow mosaic virus
•Host plant resistance Cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus
•Seed systems Cucumber mosaic virus
Southern bean mosaic virus
Banana Cowpea chlorotic mottle
Banana bunchy top Soybean mosaic virus
•Epidemiology Tobacco ringspot virus
•Investigations on management options Tobacco streak virus
Soybean begomoviruses
Cocoa • Host resistance
Cocoa swollen shoot virus • Diversity and distribution
•Distribution and diversity
•Seed systems
www.iita.org
18. Generic activities
Plant health monitoring & quarantine
•Virus indexing
•Establishment of virus-free clonal and seed germplasm
•Facilitation of germplasm distribution
Diagnostics
•PCR and ELISA-based approaches
•Viruses, fungi, bacteria and others
•Mycotoxins
Capacity building
•Graduate and post-graduates (MSc & PhD)
•Training courses & workshops for groups
•Methods manual
•Public database
•Supply of tools and materials
www.iita.org
20. Cassava virology
1. CMD and CBSD diversity
2. Alternative hosts of CMD
3. Improve diagnostics
4. Virus-host interactions and host resistance
5. Whitefly vector: dynamics, host interaction and control
OJ Alabi and RA Naidu (WSU, USA) SA Akinbade & Ope
R Hanna, J Legg, G Melaku, E Kanju, P Ntawuruhunga & P Kulakow
•USAID-linkage grant, GLCI, IFAD, USAID
•IITA Opportunity Grant, Travel Grant & Strategic Grant
www.iita.org
21. Cassava mosaic disease
Caused by a complex of 7 species either alone or in mixed infection
•African cassava mosaic virus (ACMV)
•East African cassava mosaic virus (EACMV)
•South African cassava mosaic virus (SACMV)
•EACMV-Cameroon, EACMV-Malawi, EACMV-Kenya, EACMV-Zanzibar
EACMV-Uganda (Recombinant virus)
www.iita.org
22. CMG Distribution
• Surveys were conducted in 7 countries
• Samples analyzed by differential PCR &
sequencing
80
70
60 ACMV
% incidence
50 Both
40 None
30 EACMV
20 UgV
10
0
9
9
09
8
ia
08
08
89
-0
-0
-0
er
ie
08
e
la
a
a
07
ig
on
or
n
n
go
on
N
ha
ha
n
Iv
Le
An
ni
o
d'
G
G
er
Be
ra
e
am
er
ot
C
Si
C
•Only ACMV was detected in samples in Mali and Niger.
•EACMV-UG was detected in Angola and Cameroon.
www.iita.org
23. Tracking the spread of EACMV-UG
2009
2008
2009
•As of 2005, Spread in 2.6 million sq. km causing an
estimated loss of 47% in affected countries.
•Spread into Cameroon in West-Central Africa
•Spread into Angola in Southern Africa
•Also reported from Burkina Faso and Togo in 2009
Kumar et al, 2008; Akinbade et al., 2010
www.iita.org
24. CMG Distribution
Conclusions
•ACMV is predominate, followed by mixed infection of ACMV and EACMV.
•Other viruses found are EACMV and EACMCV, but not SCMV or other EACMV’s
•EACMV-UG was detected only in Angola and Cameroon
•DNA-A segments of ACMV, EACMCV and EACMV-UG sequenced were
96-98% identical to previously reported sequences
g i|1 4 8 8 9 7 7 4 7 || E a s t Afric a
• Evidence of EACMCV (recombinant
g i|2 2 1 3 6 0 4 3 4 |E a s t Afr ic a
g i|8 9 3 3 0 6 1 7 |e E a s t Afr ic a n
species) in Ghana even in 1989, ten 99
g i|8 9 3 3 0 6 7 1 |e E a s t Afric a n
g i|7 2 2 9 2 8 8 | E a s t Afric a n c
years before its discovery. g i|7 2 2 9 2 8 2 | E a s t Afric a n c
g i|1 4 8 8 9 7 7 4 0 || E a s t Afric a
g i|8 9 3 3 0 5 5 5 |E a s t Afr ic a n
• Isolates have same age as the first ever 100
51 g i|8 9 3 3 0 5 8 3 |E a s t Afr ic a n
g i|8 9 3 3 0 9 4 2 |E a s t Afr ic a n
sequences of ACMV published in 1980s. g i|8 9 3 3 0 7 4 8 | E a s t Afric a n
g i|8 9 3 3 0 9 6 3 |E a s t Afr ic a n
74
g i|8 9 3 3 0 9 6 3 E a s t Afr ic a n
g i|3 8 9 2 5 6 9 |E a s t Afr ic a n
• First ever recombinant ACMV 70 g i|7 0 0 8 1 1 3 |S o u th Afric a n
AC M V F N4 3 5 2 7 7
found in in Angola 100 G h a n a 1 9 8 9 AC M V
IC M V AY 7 3 0 0 3 5 .2
100 S L C M V |NC 0 0 3 8 6 1
E AC M C V -T z 1 AY 7 9 5 9 8 3
100
E AC M C V -NG E U6 8 5 3 2 3
100
E AC M C V -Iv o ry AF 2 5 9 8 9 6
G h a n a -1 9 8 9 - E AC M C V
Kumar et al., 2008; Akinbade et al., 2010 www.iita.org
25. Recombinant ACMV
•Two types of ACMV detected: Wild type and Recombinant ACMV
• Entire AV1 and AV2 (ca 1000 bp) in DNA-A segment in recombinant
ACMV has high similarities with EACMV.
• Named as ACMV-ANG. Further studies required to assess its affect on
pathogenicity.
A16.3RecACMV Recombinant ACMV-ANG
A16.3UGMld Potential parent of ACMV
ACMVX17095
ACMVAJ427910
ACMVICAF259894
ACMVSvrAF126802
ACMVMldAF126800
ACMVTZAY795982
EACMZVAJ717562
EACMKVKEAJ71758
0
SACMVNC003803
EACMCVAF112354
EACMCVNG
EACMCVIC
EACMMVAJ006460
EACMVKEAJ717542
EACMVTZ
EACMVUG2Mld Potential parent of
AV1 and AV2
EACMVUG2Svr
EACMVNC004674 www.iita.org
26. Alternative hosts to CMGV
ACMV+EACMV
Senna occidentalis
Leucana leucocephala
Manihot glaziovii
Combretum confertum
Glycine max (soybean)
ACMV only
Ricinus communis Centrosema Sida
Abelmoschus esculentus (Okra)*
Centrosema pubescens
Sida cordifolia*
• ACMV and EACMCV has high
homologies
• Indicates active migration
between cassava and other hosts Leucana Okra
• Risk of novel recombination's
*New record in 2009 Alabi et al., 2008
www.iita.org
27. Cassava brown streak virus
Potyviridae: Ipomovirus
?
Prior to 2005
Post 2005
?
• First recognized in 1920s.
• Affecting 1.6 million people in Eastern Africa
• Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Malawi and Mozambique
• Suspected in DRC, Burundi and Rwanda
www.iita.org
29. Improved diagnostics
CBSV and CMBVs are complex and often necessitates multiple tests.
Cassava brown streak virus
•Sequence information points to divergent types (2 species and several strains?)
Cassava mosaic begomoviruses (CMBVs) in SSA
• African cassava mosaic
• East African cassava mosaic
• East African cassava mosaic Cameroon virus
• East African cassava mosaic Zanzibar virus
• East African cassava mosaic Malawi virus
• East African cassava mosaic Kenya virus
• East African cassava mosaic virus-Uganda
• South African cassava mosaic virus
• Indian cassava mosaic
www.iita.org
30. Simultaneous detection of
ACMV and EACMV complex
Primer Sequence (5’ to 3’) Length (nts) Size (bp)
CMBRep/F CRTCAATGACGTTGTACCA 19
ACMVRep/R CAGCGGMAGTAAGTCMG 17 368 for ACMV
EACMVRep/R GGTTTGCAGAGAACTACATC 20 650 for EACMV
• Detects all CMBs reported in SSA, with
exception of EACMZV, SACMV, ICMV, SLCMV
Alabi et al., 2008
www.iita.org
31. Multiplex PCR for simultaneous
ACMV
EACMCV detection of CMBV and CBSV
CBSV-S1/S2 + CMB CBSV-L1/L2 + CMB
Sap DNA&RNA
ACMV & Sap DNA & RNA
M1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 34 5 6 7 M1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 34 5 6 7 M
EACMCV
EACMV
ACMV
CBSV
Lanes 1 to 4: CBSV infected samples
Lane 5: Healthy cassava
Lane 6: CMD afffected cassava
Primer name Sequence (5’ to 3’) Lane 7: CBSD affected cassava
Lane M: Molecular weight marker (100 kb ladder)
CBSVcp-L1 CAGAATAGTGTTGCTGCAGGTAA
CBSVcp-L2 CTACATTATTATCATCTCC
CBSVcp-S1 GCAGGTAAGGCGTTTGTG
CBSVcp-S2 TCTACCAACATTCGCTG
Kumar et al., 2009
www.iita.org
32. Ongoing / future priorities
CBSD
• Improvement in diagnostics – NASH and RT-PCR (GLCI)
• Alternative hosts for CBSV (GLCI)
• Impact of CBSV strains on host resistance (GLCI & USAID)
• Understand the causation of root necrosis (GLCI)
• CBSV evolution and within field and location diversity (USAID)
• ELISA-based assays to CBSV (USAID / GLCI)
• Protocol for the production of CBSV-free tissue culture material (GLCI)
CMD and CBSD
• Whitefly management programs as away to reduce disease incidence (IITA
Strategic grant)
Generic
• Monitoring programs to prevent the spread of CBSD and EACMV-UG spread
CMGV and CBSV diversity and its impact on host resistance
• Development of dual resistant cassava varieties
www.iita.org
33. Maize virology
1. Host plant resistance to Maize streak virus
2. Mechanisms of resistance
3. High-throughput phenotyping for MSV
• MSV is restricted to only Africa
• The most damaging disease of maize in SSA
• Annual losses, $120 – 480 million
• Breeding for MSV resistance is integral in our programs
A Menkir and S Hearne
M Salaudeen, O Taiwo, A Razaq
•DTMA and Core funds
www.iita.org
34. Screening for MSV resistance
6-7 DAS
Material selection
1 0
7
60
54 Days after 10
3
48 sowing
42
36
30
14
9-10 DAS
Inoculation with leaf hoppers
30 to 50 DAS
Symptom scoring
at weekly intervals
13-14 DAS
First symptoms
(most genotypes have 3-4
days incubation period)
www.iita.org
35. High-throughput phenotyping for MSV
Disease evaluation
0 = No infection or escape
1 = Most resistant (less than 10% streaks)
2 = Resistant (10-25% streaks)
3 = Moderately resistant (25-50% streaks)
4 = Susceptible (50-75% streaks)
5 = Highly susceptible (>75% streaks)
Virus quantification in plants by ELISA
Rep # 1 Rep # 2 Rep # 3 Rep # 4
Control line
Test line
S5 S4 S3 S2 S1
www.iita.org
36. Good recovery Susceptible
Good recovery
www.iita.org
37. Performance of maize genotypes
Group A
High recovery
5.0
MsvS10
Severity score
4.0
MsvS09
3.0
MsvS18
2.0
MsvS08
1.0
Msv S26
0.0
MsvS07
1 2 3 4 5 6
MsvS12
MsvS04 Weeks
Group B
MsvS11
MsvS20
5.0
MsvS03
4.0
MsvS17
3.0
score
Msv S30
2.0
MsvS19
1.0
MsvS02
No recover Group C
0.0 MsvS22
1 2 3 4 5 6 MsvS06 Msv S27
Weeks MsvS01 6.0 MsvS16
MsvS14 5.0 MsvS15
Moderate recovery
Severity
MsvS24 4.0
Msv S28
3.0
MsvS13
2.0
MsvS21
1.0
MsvS23
0.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 Msv S25
Msv S29
Weeks
Pool 6 control
www.iita.org
38. Virus concentration vs Severity score
0.80
0.60
Leaf 1
ODv values
0.40 leaf 2
Leaf 3
0.20
After 6 weeks
0.00
MX10 MX5 MX3 MX4
6.0
5.0 Week 1
4.0 Week 2
score
Week 3
3.0
week 4
2.0
week 5
1.0 week 6
0.0
MX10 MX5 MX3 MX4
Group A B Genotype
C D
www.iita.org
39. Recovery mechanism offers
protection to MSV
6.0
5.0
4.0 Group A
Group B
3.0
Group C
2.0 Pool 6 control
1.0
0.0
1 2 3 4 5 6
• No evidence of resistance to leafhopper feeding.
• Incubation period is 3-4 days in genotypes evaluated so far
• Most genotypes showed recover type resistance (reduction in chlorotic
streaks as well as virus concentration)
• No indication of symptom remission.
• No immunity
www.iita.org
40. MSV resistance in S1 testcrosses
• Field experiment for incidence, severity and agronomic performance
• 6 S1 crosses were highly resistant to MSV and good agronomic performance.
• Resistance is superior to what has been found in MSV transgenics
(Shepherd et al., 2007)
80.0 3.5
67.6
Disease incidence (%)
70.0 3.0 3
58.3
Disease severity
2.8
60.0 2.5
2.5
50.0 45.0 45.2 2.1
2.0 2.02 Incidence
40.0
1.5 Severity
30.0
20.0 1
10.0 0.5
0.0 0
1WPI WPI3WPI WPI5WPI6WPI WPI8WPI WPI
2 4 7 9
Time (week)
Salaudeen et al., 2010
www.iita.org
41. On-going and future plans
• Further characterization of promising lines and release to farmers
• Augment resistance to MSV in other backgrounds
• Identification of association markers for MSV (DTMA)
• Mechanisms of resistance
• Host-MSV interactions
www.iita.org
42. Yam virology
• Diversity and distribution of viruses infecting yams
in West Africa
• Characterization of YBSD
• Development of diagnostic tools
• Symptomology and synergistic interactions
• Host resistance
• Evaluation of mapping population
• Virus-free seed systems
R Asiedu and A Sartie
O Patricia, R Ronke, M Toually and S Asala,
•IFAD and Core funds
www.iita.org
43. Virus reported to infect
Dioscorea yams in West Africa
Virus Distribution Disease importance
Yam mosaic virus Worldwide High
(YMV; Potyvirus)
Yam mild mosaic virus Worldwide High*
(YMMV; Potyvirus)
Cucumber mosaic virus Worldwide High*
(CMV; Cucumovirus)
Dioscorea bacilliform viruses (many Worldwide High*
strains and species) (DBV; Badnavirus)
Dioscorea sansibarensis bacilliform Benin Not known***
virus (DsBV; Badnavirus)
Yam internal brown spot virus Cote d’Ivory, Benin(?), High**
(IBSV; Badnavirus*) The Caribbean
Dioscorea ring mottle virus Togo Not known***
(DaRMV; Potyvirus)
Dioscorea mottle virus Nigeria Not known***
(DMoV; Comovirus?)
*Often detected in mixed infection; known to have synergistic effect on symptom expression
**Virus-like disease of unknown etiology
***Limited information on virus characters
www.iita.org
46. Evaluation of mapping population
Virus indexing Following evaluation
Sl. Accession
No. name Genotype details* Tuber Plant
1 TDr 93-2 Resistant to YMV Y ng -
2 TDr 1621 Resistant to YMV Y ng -
3 TDr 1640 Resistant to YMV Y Y Susceptible
4 TDr 89/ 02665 Resistant to YMV Y - -
5 TDr 97/ 00777 Highly susceptible to YMV Y Y, B Susceptible
6 TDr 93-32 Highly susceptible to YMV Y Y Moderately Tolerant (Promising)
7 TDr 95/ 18531 Susceptible to YMV Y Y, B Susceptible
8 TDr 747 Susceptible to YMV Y Y, B Susceptible
9 TDr3661 Susceptible to YMV - Y, B Moderately Tolerant (Promising)
10 TDr 2261 Susceptible to YMV Y Y, B Susceptible
11 TDr 95-127 No information Y Y, B Susceptible
12 TDr 95/ 01932 No information Y ng -
13 TDr 99/ 02789 No information Y Y, B Moderate
14 TDr 98/ 01317 No information Y Y, B Moderately Tolerant (Promising)
15 TDa85/ 00250 Resistant to anthracnose Y,B Y, B Moderately Tolerant (Promising)
16 TDa87/ 01091 Resistant to anthracnose Y Y, B Moderately Tolerant (Promising)
17 TDa95/ 00328 Susceptible to anthracnose Y, B Y, B Tolerant (Recommended
18 TDa95- 310 Susceptible to anthracnose Y, B Y, B Tolerant Recommended
19 TDa92- 2 Susceptible to anthracnose Y, B Y, B Susceptible
20 TDa98/ 01166 No information Y Y, B Tolerant (Recommended)
www.iita.org
50. Studies on IBSD etiology
• Wide spread in Cote d’Ivoire
• Known for about 40 to 60 years
5
3
4
1
2
• Bètè-bètè is highly susceptible
Distribution and severity of necrotic symptoms in tuber
Tubers sections (mean)*
4
No. No. Percent 1 2 (apico- 3 (median-
observed symp* symp* (Top) median) (middle) base) 5 (base)
178 105 60 3.0 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.1
www.iita.org
51. Phenotyping yams for
virus resistance
•D. rotundata accessions were
evaluated in 2008-09 season.
•987 accessions in total (3488
plants)
Score:
1 = highly resistant (no visible symptoms)
2 = resistant (mild mottling/mosaic on few leaves)
3 = moderately resistant (mild mottling/mosaic on most leaves)
4 = susceptible (severe mottling / mosaic on most leaves)
5 = highly susceptible (severe mosaic/mottling, stunting and distortion) www.iita.org
52. Phenotyping yams for
virus resistance
Susceptible 5%
(Score 4)
Resistant 7%
Highly susceptible 5% (Score 2)
(Score 5) •There is no immunity or very
high resistance in these
germplasm.
N = 987
Moderately resistant 83%
(Score 3)
Score:
1 = highly resistant (no visible symptoms)
2 = resistant (mild mottling/mosaic on few leaves)
3 = moderately resistant (mild mottling/mosaic on most leaves)
4 = susceptible (severe mottling / mosaic on most leaves)
5 = highly susceptible (severe mosaic/mottling, stunting and distortion) www.iita.org
53. Next steps
• Determine the diversity of viruses in West Africa and improve diagnostic
tools
• Understand the etiology of YBSD
• Symptomology and yield losses
• Evaluation of mapping population for YMV
• Virus-free seed systems
www.iita.org
54. Soybean virology
• Baseline studies to assess the impact of
virus diseases on soybean
• Evaluation of improved varieties and
breeding lines against
widespread/economically important
viruses.
• Monitor seed stocks and eliminate virus
contaminated seed.
H Tefera, C Fatokun,
T Imbor, R Adesida and P Ogunsanya
•TL2 and Core funds
www.iita.org
58. Virus incidence in various states
120
100
% infection
80
60
40
20
0
Ba u
a
A d un a
Ka a
e
yo
hi
o
Ka o
a
er
pl a
as CT
a
gi
ea
b
w
n
aw
nu
rn
in
ar
uc
Ko
ig
O
ra
Ka
ra
F
ts
Bo
Kw
d
Be
at
N
am
Ta
sa
N
State
•Virus incidence exceed 50% in 13 of the 15 states (87%) surveyed
www.iita.org
62. New whitefly-transmitted
begomoviruses in soybean
[Legumoviruses]
•Soybean chlorotic blotch virus (SbCBV)
•Soybean mild mottle virus (SbMMV)
•Begomoviruses (legumogroup)
•Novel types within features of both new
world and old world begomoviruses
Alabi et al., 2010
www.iita.org
63. Novel features
CRA CRB
AC4
(2117…2410)
AV1
(260…1021)
SbCBV
SbCBV
2647 bp BV1
2708 bp AC5 BC1
(373…1158)
AC1 (701…995)
(1219…2310)
(1479…2567)
AC3
(1018…1431)
AC2
(1163…1579)
First bipartite legumoviruses
that lack AV2 gene;
IR
V2
(1…507)
C4
SbMMV
(2198…25)
2768 bp V1
C1
First monopartite legumovirus
(299…1072)
(1563…2612)
C3
(1069…1473)
C2
(1187…1624)
www.iita.org
67. Disease of unknown etiology
• Virus-like disease of
unknown etiology.
• Extreme reduction in
leaf lamina, stunting of
plant and thickening of
stems.
• African soybean dwarf?
www.iita.org
68. New soybean disease in
Southern Africa
•Incidence of soybean phyllody was high in Mozambique (15-25%)
Virus disease incidence was very low in Southern Africa
•Low incidence
•CPMMV and SMV detected in few fields
www.iita.org
69. Next steps
• Evaluation of soybean genotypes for resistance to
abundant viruses (CPMMV, SMV, CMV, BPMV, CABMV)
• Characterization of soybean phyllody
• Diagnostics for common soybean viruses
• Characterization of new soybean infecting viruses
www.iita.org
70. Cowpea virology
Focus:
• Evaluation of germplasm
(landraces / improved varieties)
for resistance to viruses
[adding value to drought and striga
resistance; earliness etc.]
• Breeding for multiple virus
resistance
• Establishment of virus-free cowpea
seed stocks
C Fatokun, B Ousman
K Ogunsola, R Adesida, P Ogunsanya
Core and TL2
www.iita.org
71. Important viruses of
cowpea in West Africa
Virus Abbreviation Genus Vector
1 Blackeye cowpea mosaic BlCMV Potyvirus Aphids
2 Cowpea aphid-borne mosaic CABMV Potyvirus Aphids
3 Cucumber mosaic CMV Cucumovirus Aphids
4 Cowpea mottle CMeV Carmovirus Beetles
5 Cowpea mosaic CPMV Comovirus Beetles
6 Southern bean mosaic SBMV Sobemovirus Beetles
7 Cowpea mild mottle CMMV Carlavirus Whiteflies
*All these viruses are seed transmitted
Viruses of minor importance (sporadic incidence):
Bean pod mottle virus; Peanut mottle; Sunn-hemp mosaic;
Cowpea golden mosaic; Cowpea severe mosaic virus
www.iita.org
73. Cowpea virus diversity and distribution
1978 samples from 166 sites from 5 countries (2008-09)
Ghana and Togo
45
(N=639)
40
Nigeria (N=833)
35
%Infection
30
25
20 Benin and Mali
(N=899)
15
10
5
0
CAbMV
CAbMV
CAbMV
CPMMV
CPMMV
Mixed infect
CPMV
CPMMV
CPMV
BlCMV
BlCMV
CPMV
Mixed infect
SBMV
SBMV
CMV
CMV
CMeV
BlCMV
CMeV
SBMV
CMV
CMeV
Mixed infec
• Present situation is not significantly different from a decade ago.
• Virus equation remains same: CABMV > BlCMV > CPMV > SBMV > CMoV > CMV
www.iita.org
74. Cowpea viruses in
southern Africa
• Severe incidence in
Mozambique
• Detected: BlCMV,
CpSMV, CMV, CABMV,
SBMV
• Evidence of new
strains / species
www.iita.org