A talk from 11 Febrary 2013, part of the University College London “Research Programming in Practice” seminar series. Brian Hole, founder of Ubiquity Press and creator of the Journal of Open Research Software wspeaks about a thorny problem for computationally-focused researchers: how do you best build a publication record and enhance your academic reputation when your primary output as a researcher is software? The Journal of Open Research Software is one potential solution, associating a software entity with a peer-reviewed journal publication.
1. Obtaining Research Credit for Creating software:
The Journal of Open Research Software
Brian Hole (UP & UCL)
Research Programming in Practice , UCL, 11 February 2013
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
2. Overview: why, how, where
1. Why share software?
2. How to share
3. Where: JORS & PRIME
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
3. Two questions to begin
As a research software engineer,
…what motivates you?
…what are your biggest
career challenges?
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
6. The Social Contract
of Science
• Research requires an
effective, efficient
distribution model
• Research funders are now
demanding this – it will
become the main model
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
10. Journal of Open Research Software
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
11. Citation
• Software is already
citable but this is not
something researchers
are familiar with doing.
• Handles, URIs, DataCite
DOIs, etc. cannot
currently be used
for citation tracking.
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
12. What is a software paper?
A software paper…
• … describes the methodology with which
software was created.
• … describes the software itself.
• … details the reuse potential of the software.
• … is often authored by a software engineer.
• … is citable, enabling reuse to be tracked.
A data paper is not…
• … a research paper. A software paper only
describes the software. But it will reference
research papers that rely on the software.
• … simply replication of the information in a
software repository.
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
13. Peer review
1. The paper contents
a. The methods section of the paper must provide
sufficient detail that a reader can understand how
the software was created.
b. The software must be correctly described.
c. The reuse section must provide concrete and useful
suggestions for reuse of the software.
2. The deposited software
a. The repository must be suitable for the software
and have a sustainability model.
b. Open license permits unrestricted access (e.g. GPL).
c. A version in an open, non-proprietary format.
d. code should be documented to a level that enables
others to get started.
e. Where relevant both binary and source code should
be included.
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
14. PRIME
Publisher, Repository and Institutional Metadata Exchange
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES
INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY
2012
75 YEARS OF LEADING GLOBAL ARCHAEOLOGY
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
15. PRIME: Project focus
• Developing a system to exchange metadata between:
• the UCL Discovery EPrints institutional repository
• the Archaeology Data Service subject repository
• the Journal of Open Archaeology Data (JOAD)
• Focusing on archaeology data only to pilot the system
• Building on other successful JISC projects:
• DryadUK
• REWARD
• SWORD-ARM
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
17. PRIME: Use Case #1
• A UCL Researcher deposits data in an external subject repository.
• The subject repository sends the metadata and DOI of the data to the
UCL institutional repository so that it has a record of the output.
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
18. PRIME: Use Case #2
• A UCL Researcher deposits data in their institutional repository.
• The institutional repository sends the metadata and DOI of the data to
the appropriate subject repository so that it has a record of the output.
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
19. PRIME: Use Case #3
• A UCL Researcher submits an article to a journal, and is asked to archive the data
as a precondition of publication.
• The journal sends the metadata to the subject repository so that the author does
not have to re-enter it.
• The subject repository sends the metadata and DOI of the data to the
institutional repository so that it has a record of the output, and the DOI back to
the journal to link the article with the data.
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
