SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 24
Breaking Tolerance to Invoke an Immune Response to Cancer (Melanoma)




Introduction:
This paper is dedicated to all the Melanoma Patients that aren’t here today but were
instrumental in this research through all the clinical trials.


I have postulated that the T Regulatory Cells (Treg) may be the major stumbling
block in the whole immunotherapy response rate.

 Recent studies have shown that CD4+CD25high FoxP3+ Treg cells are
overrepresented in human metastatic lymph nodes with a 2-fold increased frequency
compared with both tumor-free lymph nodes and that advanced melanoma is
associated with increased numbers of circulating Treg cells and Dendritic Cells
(DCs) and suggested that melanoma induces immunosuppressive DCs and Treg cells
in the systemic circulation of the patients . Vence et al also showed the presence of
tumor antigen-specific CD4+ Treg cells in the blood of patients with metastatic
melanoma.

This means the host (you) may already have the correct antigen, but the tumor and
microenvironment may be suppressing the immune response by secreting
suppressive cytokines like TGF- beta , IL-10, and IL -6 and or proliferating the
suppressive Tregs.

 Nicholaou et al most recently showed in patients with melanoma that although
strong antibody responses were mounted, the generation of delayed-type
hypersensitivity response was significantly impaired and patients with advanced
melanoma had a significantly higher proportion of circulating CD4+ CD25+


                                                                                    1
FoxP3+ Treg cells compared with those with minimal residual disease. So we now
can blame the tolerance of our immune system to cancer on the T Regulatory Cells
(Tregs).

It has been reported that the large number of different cell types that are claiming
to be directly targeted by FoxP3+ Treg cells are CD4+, CD8+ T cell, dendritic
cells, B cells, macrophages, osteoblasts, mast cells, NK cells, and NKT cells.




If this is the case we must temporality deplete or suppress the T- Regulatory Cells
(Tregs). This can be accomplished in a number of ways. Dr. Steven A Rosenberg uses
Cyclophosamide. This is accomplished by administering the drug prior to ACT
Therapy.
Another way to suppress the Treg function is to block the CTLA-4 receptor with an
antibody. That antibody, known as Anti-CTLA-4, Yervoy (Ipilimumab) that was
FDA approved in March of 2011.


                                                                                       2
Patients treated with Anti-CTLA-4 showed a statistically significant decrease in the
median percentage of Treg cells by Day 28 of therapy (5.8% vs.3.6%) “Biologic and
Immunomodulatory Events after CTLA-4 Blockade with Ticilimumab in Patients
with Advanced Malignant Melanoma” et al Luis H. Camacho 2006.

Also, after treatment the treated patients had a significantly higher median percentage of
resting CD4_CD25_ T cells that coexpressed PD-1 compared with control subjects
(66.4% vs. 25.0%). This mean the Anti-CTLA-4 therapy unregulated the PD-1 on resting
T-cells. This is an unwanted effect, the upregulation PD-1 is known to cause T-cell
exhaustion. This is why the combination of Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 would be a
more synergistic treatment for Melanoma.


<A HREF="https://www.box.net/s/mzxb1b2o0tue44a3z3xo">Breaking Tolerance to
Invoke an Immune Response to Cancer (Melanoma</A> <BR>




                                                                                         3
CTLA-4 blockade therapy can succeed in breaking peripheral immune tolerance in some
patients, but not in others. So what are we missing? We removed the suppressive function
of the Tregs. We believe we have tumor specific antigens. What is the one thing that
happens with most immune responses? The “DANGER SIGNAL”. You get an
inflammatory response.



                                                                                       4
Proflammatory Cytokines and chemoattractants must be induced to produce an immune
response. If not, the immune response doesn’t take hold and it (the response) is
terminated.

Now with this information, we now know that we need Proflammatory Cytokines and
chemoattractants to initiate an immune response. Recently, in a paper by Dr. Thomas F.
Gajewski, “Identifying and Overcoming Immune Resistance Mechanisms in the
Melanoma Tumor Microenvironment” 2006, he states:

"Immunotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of melanoma, such as tumor antigen-
based vaccines, can frequently boost immune responses. However, clinical responses as
measured by tumor shrinkage are seen in only a minority of patients. This observation has
prompted careful analysis of the tumor microenvironment for biologic correlates to
clinical response and also to identify mechanisms of tumor resistance. Patients with
advanced melanoma treated with antigen-specific vaccines had pre-treatment tumor
biopsies analyzed by gene expression profiling. Supervised hierarchical clustering was
performed based on clinical outcome. An expanded bank of tumors was analyzed to
increase the sample size and better understand gene patterns.

Two major categories of melanoma metastases have been observed.

One subgroup of patient has an inflamed phenotype that includes expression of
chemokines, T-cell markers, and other immunoregulatory factors. Clinical responders to
melanoma vaccines appear to fall within this subset. This group also contains the highest
expression of negative regulatory factors, including PD-L1, IDO, and FoxP3, suggesting
that these immunosuppressive mechanisms may dominantly inhibit anti-tumor –cell
function in those patients. In addition, absence of B7 expression supports classical T-cell
anergy. Preclinical experiments have confirmed a critical role for these mechanisms in
limiting anti-tumor T–cell efficacy in vivo, giving candidate treatment strategies for
translation back into the clinic.

A second subset of patients is represented by tumors which are non-inflamed and lack
chemokines for T cell recruitment. Therefore, a major barrier in these cases appears to be
failed T –cell migration into tumor sites. Experimental strategies to augment T-cell
migration can have important anti-tumor effects in preclinical models. The presence of
the "inflamed" gene signature was associated with a type I IFN transcriptional profile,
and murine experimental models have confirmed a critical role for type I IFN signaling in
promoting adaptive immunity."




                                                                                          5
So, in the first subset of Patients, tumors had a suppressive nature that may be over-
ridden by Anti-CTLA-4 (Yervoy) and or Anti-PD-1 Therapy.




The second subset was missing the "danger signal" inflammatory cytokines and
chemoattractants most likely due to STAT3 signaling from the Tumor.




                                                                                         6
Stimulation of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) activates macrophages and results in the
release of TNF-alpha. It is hypothesized that melanoma inhibits macrophage activation
by suppressing TLR-4 signaling.




                                                                                        7
So, if Melanoma suppresses Macrophage Activation, then the tumor microenvironment is
missing IL-6, IL-1b and other cytokines and chemoattractants secreted by the Tumor-
derived Antigen presenting cells (APCs) like the Dendritic Cells and Macrophages.




                                                                                   8
Activated Macrophages secrete the following cytokines under different conditions:


IL-1, IL-12, IL-6, IFN-gamma/alpha/beta and TNF-alpha

IL-6
Interleukin 6 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine and is produced in response to infection and
tissue injury. IL-6 exerts its effects on multiple cell types and can act systemically.

IL-6 stimulates liver secretion of acute phase proteins
IL-6 stimulates B-lymphocytes to produce antibodies
IL-6 in concert with IL-1b causes T-cell activation
IL-6 induces STAT 3 Signaling
IL-6 Plus TGF-b induces the Th17 cell phenotype

IL-1 beta

Interleukin-1b is a pro-inflammatory cytokine which is secreted by macrophages
activated by a number of stimuli including TNF-alpha, bacterial endotoxin and IL-1b


                                                                                        9
itself.
IL-1b exerts its effects on many different cell types locally at the site of production and
systemically (at a distance).

IL-12
Interleukin-12 is a heterodimer consisting of a p35 and a p40 subunit. Both subunits are
required for receptor binding and biological activity.
IL-12 stimulates growth of activated Natural Killer (NK) cells, CD8+ and CD4+ T- cells.
IL-12 increases NK and T-cell g-IFN production which shifts T-cell differentiation
towards a Th1-type response.
IL-12 increases NK production of TNF-alpha which can act synergistically with IFN-
gamma.
IL-12 suppresses IL-4 induced IgE production.

TNF-alpha
Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha is made by many other cells as well as macrophages, which
are major sources, especially after priming by Interferon gamma.
TNF-alpha initiates a cascade of cytokines which mediate an inflammatory response.
TNF-alpha effects are mediated through two types of receptor, a 75kDa TNFR-a receptor
and a 55kDa TNFR-b receptor.
TNF-alpha regulates the expression of many genes in many cell types important for the
host response to infection.

IFN-gamma/beta

Macrophages, and many other cells produce these Type I interferons which act as
immunomodulatory, as well as antiviral cytokines. Distinct receptor from interferon
gamma, mediates overlapping or competing effects on macrophages. Cellular signaling
pathways involve Jak/Stats, and other pathways.

So, if Melanoma suppresses Macrophage Activation, then the tumor’s microenvironment
is missing IL-6, IL-1b and other cytokines. This change in the tumor’s microenvironment
results in the suppression of the T- cell Activation.




                                                                                              10
If you look at the above micrographs, you will see that the two patients that had relapsed
(10710 and 10737) had IL-1b and IL-6 missing. The macrophages were not activated!!!!
The "Danger Signal" known as inflammation was missing! The non-responders most
likely had their macrophages polarized to a M2-like phenotype.




                                                                                        11
12
So what if you introduced a mixture of cytokines that resembles the secretion from the
Tumor derived APCs. Would you induce an immune response? This is just what a small
Biotech company; CEL-SCI Corporation is trying. It is now in Phase 3 clinical trials. It is
used prior to therapy/radiation to enhance the immune system.




                                                                                          13
“As we look at data from Phase I and Phase II clinical trials, we see strong
indication that Multikine simulates the activities of a healthy person’s immune
system, enabling it to use the body’s own anti-tumor immune response.”

What if there was another way to activate the immune system. Recent research
shows that if you use CpG ODNs (TLR9 antogonists) on mature dendritc cells,
immune activation occurs. “Deoxycytidyl-deoxyguanosine [(CpG)3]
oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) signal through TLR9 to induce innate immune responses
and adjuvant effects that promote T cell responses.” et al C. V. Harding and colleagues.
CpG ODNs can be divided into three Classes. Class C, CpG-B&C ODNs stimulate B
cells efficiently to produce IgM and IL-6. This is very important because we want IL-6
produced because IL-6 in concert with IL-1b causes T-cell activation.

TLR9 signaling regulates multiple aspects of antigen processing and APC function. In
mice, TLR9 is widely expressed by APCs, including myeloid DCs (mDCs), pDCs,
macrophages, and B cells. In humans, TLR9 expression is restricted to (pDCs)
plasmacytoid DCs and B cells. CpG ODNs promote maturation of mDCs, which results
in enhanced expression of MHC-I, MHC-II, and costimulatory molecules (i.e., CD40,
CD80, and CD86) B7-1, B7-2 and increased MHC-I and MHC-II antigen-presentation
function.




                                                                                      14
Activation of a T-cell


According to Dr. Slingluff in a paper recently, he broke down the immunohistologic
Characteristics into three immunotypes.

In the research paper “Immunotype and Immunohistologic Characteristics of Tumor
Infiltrating Immune Cells are Associated with Clinical Outcome in Metastatic
Melanoma”1 et al Slingluff 2012, it breaks down the Immunohistologic Characteristics
into three distinct immunotypes:

A) No infiltration of immune cells in the tumor’s microenvironment.
B) Infiltrating Immune cells only in close proximity to the tumor’s vascular system
C) Diffuse immune cell infiltrates throughout a metastatic tumor and its microenvironment.




                                                                                       15
Immunohistologic Characteristics of Tumor Infiltrating Immune Cells

Immunotype            A                      B                     C
Immune cell           None(very Low)         Some                  Throughout
infiltration
Estimated median      15                     23                    130
survival (months)
Metastases (%)        29                     63                    8
B-cells               Low                    Med                   High
Macrophages           High                   Med                   Low
likely M1 or M2       M2                     Mix                   M1
CD8+ T-cells          Low                    Med                   High

Overall, the most predominant immune cells were T cells (53%), followed by the B cell
lineage cells (33%), and then by macrophages (13%), with NK and mature dendritic cells
only hardly present.

With the setting of the tumor’s microenvironment evaluated, we will focus the low survival
immunotype A patients. How can we improve the overall survival and the immune response
to Melanoma? We need to push the differentiation of the macrophages towards the M1
phenotype.
Macrophages are important tumor-infiltrating cells and play pivotal roles in tumor growth
and metastasis. Macrophages participate in immune responses to tumors in a polarized
manner: classic M1 macrophages produce interleukin (IL) 12 to promote tumoricidal
responses, whereas M2 macrophages produce IL10 and help tumor progression. The
mechanisms governing macrophage polarization are unclear But in 1990 it was
discovered treatment of M2 macrophages with GM-CSF or IFN-gamma led to
production of M1 phenotypic markers upon LPS stimulation. The research paper “IRF5
promotes inflammatory macrophage 1 polarization and TH1-TH17 response” Et al
Irina A. Udalova explains it in great detail.

One of the hallmarks of M1 macrophage polarisation is acquired antigen presenting
features leading to efficient Th1 response.




                                                                                     16
The M1 macrophage phenotype is induced by Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) followed by
stimulation with bacterial products like lipopolysaccharides (LPS) or by treatment of
monocytes with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Based on
Immunohistologic Characteristics of Tumor Infiltrating Immune Cells presented by Dr.
Slingluff, the macrophages in the A type (Non-responder) must be M2 phenotype. Since the
Macrophage are known to have plasticity, one could in theory change their
microenvironment to shift the macrophages from M2 to M1 phenotype.

We need to somehow combine these immunotherapies with a cancer vaccine to invoke an
immune response using the macrophages as the starter of immunity with memories T-cells so
we can eliminate any reoccurrence.

Oncologists have been working on this for decades.

 I believe they may have discovered the right combination to just that. Dr. Kingston Mills and
colleagues from the Immune Regulation Research Group, School of Biochemistry and
Immunology, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin

Immunotherapy with PI3K Inhibitor and Toll-Like Receptor
Agonist Induces IFN-γ IL-17þ Polyfunctional T Cells That
Mediate Rejection of Murine Tumors



Dr. Mills and colleagues discovered that if you combine a PI3k inhibitor with TRL agonists
(TRL9 and or 5) with DC vaccine/tumor antigen, you invoke a tremendous immune response
along with memory cells. This is because this combination (PI3k inhibitor with TRL


                                                                                       17
agonists) induces IFN gamma which differentiates M2 macrophages into the M1 phenotype
which in turn activates the Th1 effector T-cells.

TLR agonists, including CpG ODNs, have been shown to break tolerance to self-antigens
by inhibiting the function of Treg cells via the production of IL-6 by DC. However, CpG
ODNs have also been shown to stimulate the production of IL-10 by DC, and promote
the induction of Treg cells. Therefore, CpG ODNs can generate effector as well as
suppressive immune responses well as suppressive immune responses.




Immune activation by CpG ODN initiates with specific binding to the TLR9 receptor in
B cells and plasmacytoid DCs. TLR9 ligation in DCs results in secondary activation of
lymphocytes, macrophage, monocyte, NK-cell, and T-cell populations through the
elaboration of cytokines generating a TH1 cytokine milieu. This results in increased NK
activity as well as improved antigen presentation and T cell help that can augment
humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. In addition, TLR ligation results in the
production of IL-6 by DCs, which helps overcome the suppressive effect of CD4 CD25
Treg cells.




                                                                                      18
TLR9 signaling regulates multiple aspects of antigen processing and APC function. In
mice, TLR9 is widely expressed by APCs, including myeloid DCs (mDCs), pDCs,
macrophages, and B cells. In humans, TLR9 expression is restricted to pDCs and B
cellset al H. Wagner. CpG ODNs promote maturation of mDCs, which results in
enhanced expression of MHC-I, MHC-II, and costimulatory molecules (i.e., CD40,
CD80, and CD86) and increased MHC-I and MHC-II antigen-presentation function et al
C.V. Harding.

 With the addition of a PI3K Inhibitor, one can tilt the T-cell Differentiation toward the
Th1 Phenotype and limiting the propagation of Tregs. This is a winning combination. It
not only awakens the innate immune system, but also awakens the Adaptive Immune
System which can mount an immune response with memory. A VACINATION in vivo.
This approach uses the full arsenal of the immune system.




                                                                                             19
One also thinks if you add Yervoy and anti-PD-1 with TRL9 agonist you might also
produce the right immune response. This assumption needs to be tested with Clinical
trials.




                                                                                      20
21
22
22
22

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Cancer Immunotherapy from Bench to Clinic_Mohamed Labib Salem ,ppt
Cancer Immunotherapy from Bench to Clinic_Mohamed Labib Salem ,pptCancer Immunotherapy from Bench to Clinic_Mohamed Labib Salem ,ppt
Cancer Immunotherapy from Bench to Clinic_Mohamed Labib Salem ,pptProf. Mohamed Labib Salem
 
Immunotherapy Web Presentation
Immunotherapy   Web PresentationImmunotherapy   Web Presentation
Immunotherapy Web Presentationanthonymaida
 
July 2015 Cancer immunotherapy update
July 2015 Cancer immunotherapy updateJuly 2015 Cancer immunotherapy update
July 2015 Cancer immunotherapy updateYujia Sun
 
Immunobiology of cancer
Immunobiology of cancerImmunobiology of cancer
Immunobiology of cancerDiana Santos
 
Immunotherapy Update in Oncology
Immunotherapy Update in OncologyImmunotherapy Update in Oncology
Immunotherapy Update in OncologyDee Chaudhary
 
Basics of cancer immunotherapy 2017
Basics of cancer immunotherapy 2017Basics of cancer immunotherapy 2017
Basics of cancer immunotherapy 2017Emad Shash
 
CCO immune checkpoint_inhibitors_in_cancer_care
CCO immune checkpoint_inhibitors_in_cancer_careCCO immune checkpoint_inhibitors_in_cancer_care
CCO immune checkpoint_inhibitors_in_cancer_careAdonis Guancia
 
Pd 1 inhibitors (review and role in lymphoma)
Pd 1 inhibitors (review and role in lymphoma)Pd 1 inhibitors (review and role in lymphoma)
Pd 1 inhibitors (review and role in lymphoma)Mary Ondinee Manalo Igot
 
Cancer immunotherapy boc sciences
Cancer immunotherapy  boc sciencesCancer immunotherapy  boc sciences
Cancer immunotherapy boc sciencesBOC-Sciences
 
Immune check point inhibitors and adverse effects
Immune check point inhibitors and adverse effectsImmune check point inhibitors and adverse effects
Immune check point inhibitors and adverse effectsSCGH ED CME
 
Cancer immunotherapy
Cancer immunotherapy Cancer immunotherapy
Cancer immunotherapy Kevin Lin
 
Principles of cancer immunotherapy
Principles of cancer immunotherapyPrinciples of cancer immunotherapy
Principles of cancer immunotherapyIhor Arkhypov
 
ROLE OF IMMUNE CELLS IN CANCER AND TARGETING IMMUNE CELLS FOR CANCER THERAPY
ROLE OF IMMUNE CELLS IN CANCER AND TARGETING IMMUNE CELLS FOR CANCER THERAPYROLE OF IMMUNE CELLS IN CANCER AND TARGETING IMMUNE CELLS FOR CANCER THERAPY
ROLE OF IMMUNE CELLS IN CANCER AND TARGETING IMMUNE CELLS FOR CANCER THERAPYSIVASWAROOP YARASI
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

IMMUNE RESPONSE TO TUMORS
IMMUNE RESPONSE TO TUMORSIMMUNE RESPONSE TO TUMORS
IMMUNE RESPONSE TO TUMORS
 
Cancer Immunotherapy from Bench to Clinic_Mohamed Labib Salem ,ppt
Cancer Immunotherapy from Bench to Clinic_Mohamed Labib Salem ,pptCancer Immunotherapy from Bench to Clinic_Mohamed Labib Salem ,ppt
Cancer Immunotherapy from Bench to Clinic_Mohamed Labib Salem ,ppt
 
Immunotherapy Web Presentation
Immunotherapy   Web PresentationImmunotherapy   Web Presentation
Immunotherapy Web Presentation
 
July 2015 Cancer immunotherapy update
July 2015 Cancer immunotherapy updateJuly 2015 Cancer immunotherapy update
July 2015 Cancer immunotherapy update
 
Immunobiology of cancer
Immunobiology of cancerImmunobiology of cancer
Immunobiology of cancer
 
Immuno-Oncology: A Colloquium on the State of the Science for Oncology Clinic...
Immuno-Oncology: A Colloquium on the State of the Science for Oncology Clinic...Immuno-Oncology: A Colloquium on the State of the Science for Oncology Clinic...
Immuno-Oncology: A Colloquium on the State of the Science for Oncology Clinic...
 
Immunotherapy Update in Oncology
Immunotherapy Update in OncologyImmunotherapy Update in Oncology
Immunotherapy Update in Oncology
 
Immunotherapy
ImmunotherapyImmunotherapy
Immunotherapy
 
Tumourclasss
TumourclasssTumourclasss
Tumourclasss
 
Basics of cancer immunotherapy 2017
Basics of cancer immunotherapy 2017Basics of cancer immunotherapy 2017
Basics of cancer immunotherapy 2017
 
CCO immune checkpoint_inhibitors_in_cancer_care
CCO immune checkpoint_inhibitors_in_cancer_careCCO immune checkpoint_inhibitors_in_cancer_care
CCO immune checkpoint_inhibitors_in_cancer_care
 
Immunotherapy for cancer
Immunotherapy for cancer Immunotherapy for cancer
Immunotherapy for cancer
 
Pd 1 inhibitors (review and role in lymphoma)
Pd 1 inhibitors (review and role in lymphoma)Pd 1 inhibitors (review and role in lymphoma)
Pd 1 inhibitors (review and role in lymphoma)
 
Cancer immunotherapy boc sciences
Cancer immunotherapy  boc sciencesCancer immunotherapy  boc sciences
Cancer immunotherapy boc sciences
 
Immune check point inhibitors and adverse effects
Immune check point inhibitors and adverse effectsImmune check point inhibitors and adverse effects
Immune check point inhibitors and adverse effects
 
Immunosurveillance
ImmunosurveillanceImmunosurveillance
Immunosurveillance
 
Cancer immunotherapy
Cancer immunotherapy Cancer immunotherapy
Cancer immunotherapy
 
Principles of cancer immunotherapy
Principles of cancer immunotherapyPrinciples of cancer immunotherapy
Principles of cancer immunotherapy
 
Tumor antigen
Tumor antigenTumor antigen
Tumor antigen
 
ROLE OF IMMUNE CELLS IN CANCER AND TARGETING IMMUNE CELLS FOR CANCER THERAPY
ROLE OF IMMUNE CELLS IN CANCER AND TARGETING IMMUNE CELLS FOR CANCER THERAPYROLE OF IMMUNE CELLS IN CANCER AND TARGETING IMMUNE CELLS FOR CANCER THERAPY
ROLE OF IMMUNE CELLS IN CANCER AND TARGETING IMMUNE CELLS FOR CANCER THERAPY
 

Destacado

Melanoma and the magic bullet monoclonal antibodies 6-10-09
Melanoma and the magic bullet  monoclonal antibodies 6-10-09Melanoma and the magic bullet  monoclonal antibodies 6-10-09
Melanoma and the magic bullet monoclonal antibodies 6-10-09Retired from EASTMAN KODAK
 
The Missing Link in T-cell activation using a Vaccine, "The Danger Signal" ma...
The Missing Link in T-cell activation using a Vaccine, "The Danger Signal" ma...The Missing Link in T-cell activation using a Vaccine, "The Danger Signal" ma...
The Missing Link in T-cell activation using a Vaccine, "The Danger Signal" ma...Retired from EASTMAN KODAK
 
The magic bullet – tueday talks
The magic bullet – tueday talksThe magic bullet – tueday talks
The magic bullet – tueday talkstuesdaytalks
 
Magic bullet theory (assignment based)
Magic bullet theory (assignment based)Magic bullet theory (assignment based)
Magic bullet theory (assignment based)yumna akhtar
 

Destacado (7)

It takes two tango 2010
It takes two tango 2010It takes two tango 2010
It takes two tango 2010
 
Thailand's Regional Operating Headquarter
Thailand's Regional Operating Headquarter Thailand's Regional Operating Headquarter
Thailand's Regional Operating Headquarter
 
Melanoma and the magic bullet monoclonal antibodies 6-10-09
Melanoma and the magic bullet  monoclonal antibodies 6-10-09Melanoma and the magic bullet  monoclonal antibodies 6-10-09
Melanoma and the magic bullet monoclonal antibodies 6-10-09
 
The Missing Link in T-cell activation using a Vaccine, "The Danger Signal" ma...
The Missing Link in T-cell activation using a Vaccine, "The Danger Signal" ma...The Missing Link in T-cell activation using a Vaccine, "The Danger Signal" ma...
The Missing Link in T-cell activation using a Vaccine, "The Danger Signal" ma...
 
The magic bullet theory for melanoma
The magic bullet theory for melanomaThe magic bullet theory for melanoma
The magic bullet theory for melanoma
 
The magic bullet – tueday talks
The magic bullet – tueday talksThe magic bullet – tueday talks
The magic bullet – tueday talks
 
Magic bullet theory (assignment based)
Magic bullet theory (assignment based)Magic bullet theory (assignment based)
Magic bullet theory (assignment based)
 

Similar a Breaking tolerance to invoke an immune response to cancer

T cell Immune Pathways Current and Future Implementation in Cancer Immunother...
T cell Immune Pathways Current and Future Implementation in Cancer Immunother...T cell Immune Pathways Current and Future Implementation in Cancer Immunother...
T cell Immune Pathways Current and Future Implementation in Cancer Immunother...CrimsonpublishersCancer
 
Combining Old and New: Sensitising Drugs and Other Vaccines To Augment Effica...
Combining Old and New: Sensitising Drugs and Other Vaccines To Augment Effica...Combining Old and New: Sensitising Drugs and Other Vaccines To Augment Effica...
Combining Old and New: Sensitising Drugs and Other Vaccines To Augment Effica...NeuroAcademy
 
Anticancer immunity 2013
Anticancer immunity 2013Anticancer immunity 2013
Anticancer immunity 2013Elsa von Licy
 
Development of immune checkpoint inhibitors for treating various cancer disea...
Development of immune checkpoint inhibitors for treating various cancer disea...Development of immune checkpoint inhibitors for treating various cancer disea...
Development of immune checkpoint inhibitors for treating various cancer disea...SriramNagarajan16
 
art_10.1007_s00262-015-1719-z (2)
art_10.1007_s00262-015-1719-z (2)art_10.1007_s00262-015-1719-z (2)
art_10.1007_s00262-015-1719-z (2)Lior Lalush
 
Rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatoid arthritisRheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatoid arthritisSanjana
 
Recent advances in immunotherapy
Recent advances in immunotherapyRecent advances in immunotherapy
Recent advances in immunotherapyNidhi Maheshwari
 
Immunotherapy of lung cancer copy
Immunotherapy of lung cancer copyImmunotherapy of lung cancer copy
Immunotherapy of lung cancer copyDrAmbikaGupta
 
2015 11 Inmunoterapia en nsclc
2015 11 Inmunoterapia en nsclc2015 11 Inmunoterapia en nsclc
2015 11 Inmunoterapia en nsclcMartín Lázaro
 
TLR9 agonista en el tratamiento del cancer.pdf
TLR9 agonista en el tratamiento del cancer.pdfTLR9 agonista en el tratamiento del cancer.pdf
TLR9 agonista en el tratamiento del cancer.pdfRamiroJRodriguezGarc
 
Pharm immuno14&15 cancer & transplantpor
Pharm immuno14&15 cancer & transplantporPharm immuno14&15 cancer & transplantpor
Pharm immuno14&15 cancer & transplantpormmoney1
 
Tumor antigens & cancer immunotherapy.pptx
Tumor antigens & cancer immunotherapy.pptxTumor antigens & cancer immunotherapy.pptx
Tumor antigens & cancer immunotherapy.pptxRagavi32
 
Immunotherapy and gene therapy
Immunotherapy and gene therapyImmunotherapy and gene therapy
Immunotherapy and gene therapyashish gupta
 
Tumor immunology dr. ihsan alsaimary
Tumor immunology  dr. ihsan alsaimaryTumor immunology  dr. ihsan alsaimary
Tumor immunology dr. ihsan alsaimarydr.Ihsan alsaimary
 
IDO pathway from bench to clinic
IDO pathway from bench to clinicIDO pathway from bench to clinic
IDO pathway from bench to clinicHoussein A Sater
 
Dendritic Vaccine Laboratory Optimization and Dendritic Cell Maturation
Dendritic Vaccine Laboratory Optimization and Dendritic Cell Maturation Dendritic Vaccine Laboratory Optimization and Dendritic Cell Maturation
Dendritic Vaccine Laboratory Optimization and Dendritic Cell Maturation NeuroAcademy
 
Intra-Tumoral Lymphocytes in Breast Cancer: Real Perspectives?
Intra-Tumoral Lymphocytes in Breast Cancer: Real Perspectives?Intra-Tumoral Lymphocytes in Breast Cancer: Real Perspectives?
Intra-Tumoral Lymphocytes in Breast Cancer: Real Perspectives?Healthcare and Medical Sciences
 

Similar a Breaking tolerance to invoke an immune response to cancer (20)

T cell Immune Pathways Current and Future Implementation in Cancer Immunother...
T cell Immune Pathways Current and Future Implementation in Cancer Immunother...T cell Immune Pathways Current and Future Implementation in Cancer Immunother...
T cell Immune Pathways Current and Future Implementation in Cancer Immunother...
 
Combining Old and New: Sensitising Drugs and Other Vaccines To Augment Effica...
Combining Old and New: Sensitising Drugs and Other Vaccines To Augment Effica...Combining Old and New: Sensitising Drugs and Other Vaccines To Augment Effica...
Combining Old and New: Sensitising Drugs and Other Vaccines To Augment Effica...
 
Anticancer immunity 2013
Anticancer immunity 2013Anticancer immunity 2013
Anticancer immunity 2013
 
Development of immune checkpoint inhibitors for treating various cancer disea...
Development of immune checkpoint inhibitors for treating various cancer disea...Development of immune checkpoint inhibitors for treating various cancer disea...
Development of immune checkpoint inhibitors for treating various cancer disea...
 
art_10.1007_s00262-015-1719-z (2)
art_10.1007_s00262-015-1719-z (2)art_10.1007_s00262-015-1719-z (2)
art_10.1007_s00262-015-1719-z (2)
 
Rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatoid arthritisRheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatoid arthritis
 
Recent advances in immunotherapy
Recent advances in immunotherapyRecent advances in immunotherapy
Recent advances in immunotherapy
 
Immunotherapy of lung cancer copy
Immunotherapy of lung cancer copyImmunotherapy of lung cancer copy
Immunotherapy of lung cancer copy
 
2015 11 Inmunoterapia en nsclc
2015 11 Inmunoterapia en nsclc2015 11 Inmunoterapia en nsclc
2015 11 Inmunoterapia en nsclc
 
TLR9 agonista en el tratamiento del cancer.pdf
TLR9 agonista en el tratamiento del cancer.pdfTLR9 agonista en el tratamiento del cancer.pdf
TLR9 agonista en el tratamiento del cancer.pdf
 
Pharm immuno14&15 cancer & transplantpor
Pharm immuno14&15 cancer & transplantporPharm immuno14&15 cancer & transplantpor
Pharm immuno14&15 cancer & transplantpor
 
Immunotherapy of Cancer I
Immunotherapy of Cancer IImmunotherapy of Cancer I
Immunotherapy of Cancer I
 
Tumor antigens & cancer immunotherapy.pptx
Tumor antigens & cancer immunotherapy.pptxTumor antigens & cancer immunotherapy.pptx
Tumor antigens & cancer immunotherapy.pptx
 
Immunotherapy and gene therapy
Immunotherapy and gene therapyImmunotherapy and gene therapy
Immunotherapy and gene therapy
 
Tumor immunology dr. ihsan alsaimary
Tumor immunology  dr. ihsan alsaimaryTumor immunology  dr. ihsan alsaimary
Tumor immunology dr. ihsan alsaimary
 
Immune cell therapy
Immune cell therapyImmune cell therapy
Immune cell therapy
 
IDO pathway from bench to clinic
IDO pathway from bench to clinicIDO pathway from bench to clinic
IDO pathway from bench to clinic
 
Car t cell tumor board
Car  t cell tumor boardCar  t cell tumor board
Car t cell tumor board
 
Dendritic Vaccine Laboratory Optimization and Dendritic Cell Maturation
Dendritic Vaccine Laboratory Optimization and Dendritic Cell Maturation Dendritic Vaccine Laboratory Optimization and Dendritic Cell Maturation
Dendritic Vaccine Laboratory Optimization and Dendritic Cell Maturation
 
Intra-Tumoral Lymphocytes in Breast Cancer: Real Perspectives?
Intra-Tumoral Lymphocytes in Breast Cancer: Real Perspectives?Intra-Tumoral Lymphocytes in Breast Cancer: Real Perspectives?
Intra-Tumoral Lymphocytes in Breast Cancer: Real Perspectives?
 

Breaking tolerance to invoke an immune response to cancer

  • 1. Breaking Tolerance to Invoke an Immune Response to Cancer (Melanoma) Introduction: This paper is dedicated to all the Melanoma Patients that aren’t here today but were instrumental in this research through all the clinical trials. I have postulated that the T Regulatory Cells (Treg) may be the major stumbling block in the whole immunotherapy response rate. Recent studies have shown that CD4+CD25high FoxP3+ Treg cells are overrepresented in human metastatic lymph nodes with a 2-fold increased frequency compared with both tumor-free lymph nodes and that advanced melanoma is associated with increased numbers of circulating Treg cells and Dendritic Cells (DCs) and suggested that melanoma induces immunosuppressive DCs and Treg cells in the systemic circulation of the patients . Vence et al also showed the presence of tumor antigen-specific CD4+ Treg cells in the blood of patients with metastatic melanoma. This means the host (you) may already have the correct antigen, but the tumor and microenvironment may be suppressing the immune response by secreting suppressive cytokines like TGF- beta , IL-10, and IL -6 and or proliferating the suppressive Tregs. Nicholaou et al most recently showed in patients with melanoma that although strong antibody responses were mounted, the generation of delayed-type hypersensitivity response was significantly impaired and patients with advanced melanoma had a significantly higher proportion of circulating CD4+ CD25+ 1
  • 2. FoxP3+ Treg cells compared with those with minimal residual disease. So we now can blame the tolerance of our immune system to cancer on the T Regulatory Cells (Tregs). It has been reported that the large number of different cell types that are claiming to be directly targeted by FoxP3+ Treg cells are CD4+, CD8+ T cell, dendritic cells, B cells, macrophages, osteoblasts, mast cells, NK cells, and NKT cells. If this is the case we must temporality deplete or suppress the T- Regulatory Cells (Tregs). This can be accomplished in a number of ways. Dr. Steven A Rosenberg uses Cyclophosamide. This is accomplished by administering the drug prior to ACT Therapy. Another way to suppress the Treg function is to block the CTLA-4 receptor with an antibody. That antibody, known as Anti-CTLA-4, Yervoy (Ipilimumab) that was FDA approved in March of 2011. 2
  • 3. Patients treated with Anti-CTLA-4 showed a statistically significant decrease in the median percentage of Treg cells by Day 28 of therapy (5.8% vs.3.6%) “Biologic and Immunomodulatory Events after CTLA-4 Blockade with Ticilimumab in Patients with Advanced Malignant Melanoma” et al Luis H. Camacho 2006. Also, after treatment the treated patients had a significantly higher median percentage of resting CD4_CD25_ T cells that coexpressed PD-1 compared with control subjects (66.4% vs. 25.0%). This mean the Anti-CTLA-4 therapy unregulated the PD-1 on resting T-cells. This is an unwanted effect, the upregulation PD-1 is known to cause T-cell exhaustion. This is why the combination of Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 would be a more synergistic treatment for Melanoma. <A HREF="https://www.box.net/s/mzxb1b2o0tue44a3z3xo">Breaking Tolerance to Invoke an Immune Response to Cancer (Melanoma</A> <BR> 3
  • 4. CTLA-4 blockade therapy can succeed in breaking peripheral immune tolerance in some patients, but not in others. So what are we missing? We removed the suppressive function of the Tregs. We believe we have tumor specific antigens. What is the one thing that happens with most immune responses? The “DANGER SIGNAL”. You get an inflammatory response. 4
  • 5. Proflammatory Cytokines and chemoattractants must be induced to produce an immune response. If not, the immune response doesn’t take hold and it (the response) is terminated. Now with this information, we now know that we need Proflammatory Cytokines and chemoattractants to initiate an immune response. Recently, in a paper by Dr. Thomas F. Gajewski, “Identifying and Overcoming Immune Resistance Mechanisms in the Melanoma Tumor Microenvironment” 2006, he states: "Immunotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of melanoma, such as tumor antigen- based vaccines, can frequently boost immune responses. However, clinical responses as measured by tumor shrinkage are seen in only a minority of patients. This observation has prompted careful analysis of the tumor microenvironment for biologic correlates to clinical response and also to identify mechanisms of tumor resistance. Patients with advanced melanoma treated with antigen-specific vaccines had pre-treatment tumor biopsies analyzed by gene expression profiling. Supervised hierarchical clustering was performed based on clinical outcome. An expanded bank of tumors was analyzed to increase the sample size and better understand gene patterns. Two major categories of melanoma metastases have been observed. One subgroup of patient has an inflamed phenotype that includes expression of chemokines, T-cell markers, and other immunoregulatory factors. Clinical responders to melanoma vaccines appear to fall within this subset. This group also contains the highest expression of negative regulatory factors, including PD-L1, IDO, and FoxP3, suggesting that these immunosuppressive mechanisms may dominantly inhibit anti-tumor –cell function in those patients. In addition, absence of B7 expression supports classical T-cell anergy. Preclinical experiments have confirmed a critical role for these mechanisms in limiting anti-tumor T–cell efficacy in vivo, giving candidate treatment strategies for translation back into the clinic. A second subset of patients is represented by tumors which are non-inflamed and lack chemokines for T cell recruitment. Therefore, a major barrier in these cases appears to be failed T –cell migration into tumor sites. Experimental strategies to augment T-cell migration can have important anti-tumor effects in preclinical models. The presence of the "inflamed" gene signature was associated with a type I IFN transcriptional profile, and murine experimental models have confirmed a critical role for type I IFN signaling in promoting adaptive immunity." 5
  • 6. So, in the first subset of Patients, tumors had a suppressive nature that may be over- ridden by Anti-CTLA-4 (Yervoy) and or Anti-PD-1 Therapy. The second subset was missing the "danger signal" inflammatory cytokines and chemoattractants most likely due to STAT3 signaling from the Tumor. 6
  • 7. Stimulation of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) activates macrophages and results in the release of TNF-alpha. It is hypothesized that melanoma inhibits macrophage activation by suppressing TLR-4 signaling. 7
  • 8. So, if Melanoma suppresses Macrophage Activation, then the tumor microenvironment is missing IL-6, IL-1b and other cytokines and chemoattractants secreted by the Tumor- derived Antigen presenting cells (APCs) like the Dendritic Cells and Macrophages. 8
  • 9. Activated Macrophages secrete the following cytokines under different conditions: IL-1, IL-12, IL-6, IFN-gamma/alpha/beta and TNF-alpha IL-6 Interleukin 6 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine and is produced in response to infection and tissue injury. IL-6 exerts its effects on multiple cell types and can act systemically. IL-6 stimulates liver secretion of acute phase proteins IL-6 stimulates B-lymphocytes to produce antibodies IL-6 in concert with IL-1b causes T-cell activation IL-6 induces STAT 3 Signaling IL-6 Plus TGF-b induces the Th17 cell phenotype IL-1 beta Interleukin-1b is a pro-inflammatory cytokine which is secreted by macrophages activated by a number of stimuli including TNF-alpha, bacterial endotoxin and IL-1b 9
  • 10. itself. IL-1b exerts its effects on many different cell types locally at the site of production and systemically (at a distance). IL-12 Interleukin-12 is a heterodimer consisting of a p35 and a p40 subunit. Both subunits are required for receptor binding and biological activity. IL-12 stimulates growth of activated Natural Killer (NK) cells, CD8+ and CD4+ T- cells. IL-12 increases NK and T-cell g-IFN production which shifts T-cell differentiation towards a Th1-type response. IL-12 increases NK production of TNF-alpha which can act synergistically with IFN- gamma. IL-12 suppresses IL-4 induced IgE production. TNF-alpha Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha is made by many other cells as well as macrophages, which are major sources, especially after priming by Interferon gamma. TNF-alpha initiates a cascade of cytokines which mediate an inflammatory response. TNF-alpha effects are mediated through two types of receptor, a 75kDa TNFR-a receptor and a 55kDa TNFR-b receptor. TNF-alpha regulates the expression of many genes in many cell types important for the host response to infection. IFN-gamma/beta Macrophages, and many other cells produce these Type I interferons which act as immunomodulatory, as well as antiviral cytokines. Distinct receptor from interferon gamma, mediates overlapping or competing effects on macrophages. Cellular signaling pathways involve Jak/Stats, and other pathways. So, if Melanoma suppresses Macrophage Activation, then the tumor’s microenvironment is missing IL-6, IL-1b and other cytokines. This change in the tumor’s microenvironment results in the suppression of the T- cell Activation. 10
  • 11. If you look at the above micrographs, you will see that the two patients that had relapsed (10710 and 10737) had IL-1b and IL-6 missing. The macrophages were not activated!!!! The "Danger Signal" known as inflammation was missing! The non-responders most likely had their macrophages polarized to a M2-like phenotype. 11
  • 12. 12
  • 13. So what if you introduced a mixture of cytokines that resembles the secretion from the Tumor derived APCs. Would you induce an immune response? This is just what a small Biotech company; CEL-SCI Corporation is trying. It is now in Phase 3 clinical trials. It is used prior to therapy/radiation to enhance the immune system. 13
  • 14. “As we look at data from Phase I and Phase II clinical trials, we see strong indication that Multikine simulates the activities of a healthy person’s immune system, enabling it to use the body’s own anti-tumor immune response.” What if there was another way to activate the immune system. Recent research shows that if you use CpG ODNs (TLR9 antogonists) on mature dendritc cells, immune activation occurs. “Deoxycytidyl-deoxyguanosine [(CpG)3] oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) signal through TLR9 to induce innate immune responses and adjuvant effects that promote T cell responses.” et al C. V. Harding and colleagues. CpG ODNs can be divided into three Classes. Class C, CpG-B&C ODNs stimulate B cells efficiently to produce IgM and IL-6. This is very important because we want IL-6 produced because IL-6 in concert with IL-1b causes T-cell activation. TLR9 signaling regulates multiple aspects of antigen processing and APC function. In mice, TLR9 is widely expressed by APCs, including myeloid DCs (mDCs), pDCs, macrophages, and B cells. In humans, TLR9 expression is restricted to (pDCs) plasmacytoid DCs and B cells. CpG ODNs promote maturation of mDCs, which results in enhanced expression of MHC-I, MHC-II, and costimulatory molecules (i.e., CD40, CD80, and CD86) B7-1, B7-2 and increased MHC-I and MHC-II antigen-presentation function. 14
  • 15. Activation of a T-cell According to Dr. Slingluff in a paper recently, he broke down the immunohistologic Characteristics into three immunotypes. In the research paper “Immunotype and Immunohistologic Characteristics of Tumor Infiltrating Immune Cells are Associated with Clinical Outcome in Metastatic Melanoma”1 et al Slingluff 2012, it breaks down the Immunohistologic Characteristics into three distinct immunotypes: A) No infiltration of immune cells in the tumor’s microenvironment. B) Infiltrating Immune cells only in close proximity to the tumor’s vascular system C) Diffuse immune cell infiltrates throughout a metastatic tumor and its microenvironment. 15
  • 16. Immunohistologic Characteristics of Tumor Infiltrating Immune Cells Immunotype A B C Immune cell None(very Low) Some Throughout infiltration Estimated median 15 23 130 survival (months) Metastases (%) 29 63 8 B-cells Low Med High Macrophages High Med Low likely M1 or M2 M2 Mix M1 CD8+ T-cells Low Med High Overall, the most predominant immune cells were T cells (53%), followed by the B cell lineage cells (33%), and then by macrophages (13%), with NK and mature dendritic cells only hardly present. With the setting of the tumor’s microenvironment evaluated, we will focus the low survival immunotype A patients. How can we improve the overall survival and the immune response to Melanoma? We need to push the differentiation of the macrophages towards the M1 phenotype. Macrophages are important tumor-infiltrating cells and play pivotal roles in tumor growth and metastasis. Macrophages participate in immune responses to tumors in a polarized manner: classic M1 macrophages produce interleukin (IL) 12 to promote tumoricidal responses, whereas M2 macrophages produce IL10 and help tumor progression. The mechanisms governing macrophage polarization are unclear But in 1990 it was discovered treatment of M2 macrophages with GM-CSF or IFN-gamma led to production of M1 phenotypic markers upon LPS stimulation. The research paper “IRF5 promotes inflammatory macrophage 1 polarization and TH1-TH17 response” Et al Irina A. Udalova explains it in great detail. One of the hallmarks of M1 macrophage polarisation is acquired antigen presenting features leading to efficient Th1 response. 16
  • 17. The M1 macrophage phenotype is induced by Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) followed by stimulation with bacterial products like lipopolysaccharides (LPS) or by treatment of monocytes with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Based on Immunohistologic Characteristics of Tumor Infiltrating Immune Cells presented by Dr. Slingluff, the macrophages in the A type (Non-responder) must be M2 phenotype. Since the Macrophage are known to have plasticity, one could in theory change their microenvironment to shift the macrophages from M2 to M1 phenotype. We need to somehow combine these immunotherapies with a cancer vaccine to invoke an immune response using the macrophages as the starter of immunity with memories T-cells so we can eliminate any reoccurrence. Oncologists have been working on this for decades. I believe they may have discovered the right combination to just that. Dr. Kingston Mills and colleagues from the Immune Regulation Research Group, School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin Immunotherapy with PI3K Inhibitor and Toll-Like Receptor Agonist Induces IFN-γ IL-17þ Polyfunctional T Cells That Mediate Rejection of Murine Tumors Dr. Mills and colleagues discovered that if you combine a PI3k inhibitor with TRL agonists (TRL9 and or 5) with DC vaccine/tumor antigen, you invoke a tremendous immune response along with memory cells. This is because this combination (PI3k inhibitor with TRL 17
  • 18. agonists) induces IFN gamma which differentiates M2 macrophages into the M1 phenotype which in turn activates the Th1 effector T-cells. TLR agonists, including CpG ODNs, have been shown to break tolerance to self-antigens by inhibiting the function of Treg cells via the production of IL-6 by DC. However, CpG ODNs have also been shown to stimulate the production of IL-10 by DC, and promote the induction of Treg cells. Therefore, CpG ODNs can generate effector as well as suppressive immune responses well as suppressive immune responses. Immune activation by CpG ODN initiates with specific binding to the TLR9 receptor in B cells and plasmacytoid DCs. TLR9 ligation in DCs results in secondary activation of lymphocytes, macrophage, monocyte, NK-cell, and T-cell populations through the elaboration of cytokines generating a TH1 cytokine milieu. This results in increased NK activity as well as improved antigen presentation and T cell help that can augment humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. In addition, TLR ligation results in the production of IL-6 by DCs, which helps overcome the suppressive effect of CD4 CD25 Treg cells. 18
  • 19. TLR9 signaling regulates multiple aspects of antigen processing and APC function. In mice, TLR9 is widely expressed by APCs, including myeloid DCs (mDCs), pDCs, macrophages, and B cells. In humans, TLR9 expression is restricted to pDCs and B cellset al H. Wagner. CpG ODNs promote maturation of mDCs, which results in enhanced expression of MHC-I, MHC-II, and costimulatory molecules (i.e., CD40, CD80, and CD86) and increased MHC-I and MHC-II antigen-presentation function et al C.V. Harding. With the addition of a PI3K Inhibitor, one can tilt the T-cell Differentiation toward the Th1 Phenotype and limiting the propagation of Tregs. This is a winning combination. It not only awakens the innate immune system, but also awakens the Adaptive Immune System which can mount an immune response with memory. A VACINATION in vivo. This approach uses the full arsenal of the immune system. 19
  • 20. One also thinks if you add Yervoy and anti-PD-1 with TRL9 agonist you might also produce the right immune response. This assumption needs to be tested with Clinical trials. 20
  • 21. 21
  • 22. 22
  • 23. 22
  • 24. 22