![ALLA vet ALLT om dig ,[object Object]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/allavetalltomdig2-101209155258-phpapp02/85/Alla-vet-allt-om-dig-1-320.jpg)
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
Destacado
Destacado (20)
Similar a Alla vet allt om dig
Similar a Alla vet allt om dig (20)
Más de Mathias Klang
Más de Mathias Klang (20)
Alla vet allt om dig
- 2. VI “LÄCKER” INFORMATION
- 3. Ibland överför vi det medvetet
- 7. FACKISERING?
- 8. OFTAST INGEN PROBLEM ATT ANDRA VET SAKER OM OSS MEN VI VILL OFTA BEGRÄNSA OLIKA TYPER AV INFORMATION TILL OLIKA GRUPPER…
- 9. Fackisering som strategi är gammalt & beprövat
- 10. MEN…
- 13. TEKNIK kontrollerar hur och vad vi inteagerar, skapar & TÄNKER…
- 15. Lunarstormdecenniet 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2004 2006 Wikipedia Blogger 1999
- 16. 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2004 2006 Wikipedia Linkedin Blogger 1999 Second Life My Space Skype Google c:a 1998
- 17. 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2004 2006 Wikipedia Linkedin Blogger 1999 Second Life My Space Skype Digg Facebook YouTube Flickr Ning Google c:a 1998
- 18. Flickr 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2004 2006 Wikipedia Linkedin Blogger 1999 Second Life My Space Skype Digg Facebook Ning YouTube Twitter Spotify Google c:a 1998
- 19. Flickr 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2004 2006 Wikipedia Linkedin Blogger 1999 Second Life My Space Skype Digg Facebook Ning YouTube Twitter Spotify Google c:a 1998 2008 2007 2009 Farmville iphone Wikileaks
- 21. Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works. Anything that’s invented between when you’re fifteen and thirty-five is new and exciting and revolutionary and you can probably get a career in it. Anything invented after you’re thirty-five is against the natural order of things.
- 22. SÖKBARHET
- 25. 2006 2007
- 26. Lag & annan verklighet…
- 31. autonomi
- 32. Enter the age of FREE
- 33. Flickr 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2004 2006 Wikipedia Linkedin Blogger 1999 Second Life My Space Skype Digg Facebook Ning YouTube Twitter Spotify Google c:a 1998 2008 2007 2009 Farmville iphone Wikileaks
- 36. Från Orwell till Huxley
- 41. NÅGRA EXEMPEL
- 42. FACEBOOK
- 43. TWITTER
- 44. FLICKR
- 45. GEMENSAMT : “BEFRIAD” DATA
- 46. VAD ÄR NYTT MED DETTA?
- 47. du är inte kund: du är produkt
- 50. UPP TILL BEVIS
- 51. STUDENTER!
- 58. & då använde de inte twitter…
- 59. Alternativ?
- 63. TACK!
Notas del editor
- Talk Shows On Mute from Katie Tegtmeyer cc by
- green on green with red from Darwin Bell cc by
- is he talking to me from Leonard John Matthews cc by nc sa
- capítulo 1 by atzu cc by nc sa
- Salt pans from dachalan cc by nc sa
- Always Look on the Bright Side of... from Jon McGovern cc by nc
- 49 pigeonholes by Eva the Weaver cc by nc sa
- Chinese chess from whitecat singapore cc by nc
- Men Sign Outline from cdsessums cc by
- Kodak No. 2 Brownie, Model C by Oldtasty cc by nc sa
- Home Computer (by unknown) from Stijn Vogels cc by nc sa
- Habermas om Informationssystem 24 november 2004 Mathias Klang <klang@informatik.gu.se>
- teknologireglering 29 januari 2008 Mathias Klang <klang@informatik.gu.se>
- Looking for gators..... from katieb50 cc by
- 054-lost-n-found-screen from jeffmikels cc by sa
- goldfish from a_trotskyite cc by nc sa
- Rule of thirds from fd cc by nc
- Protection 4 from Jasmin Cormier cc by nc THIS IMAGE IS USED TWICE ON THE SAME SLIDE
- Pressed into Service from horizontal.integration cc by nc sa
- I Know I Have Lost from Kevan cc by nc
- Wilbur Likes Leaves from mommamia cc by nc sa
- 070_365 -- War Is Peace from matthileo cc by nc sa
- Google automatically scans e-mails to add context-sensitive advertisements to them. Privacy advocates raised concerns that the plan involved scanning their personal, assumed private, e-mails, and that this was a security problem. Allowing e-mail content to be read, even by a computer, raises the risk that the expectation of privacy in e-mail will be reduced. Furthermore, e-mail that non-subscribers choose to send to Gmail accounts is scanned by Gmail as well, even though those senders never agreed to Gmail's terms of service or privacy policy. Google can change its privacy policy unilaterally and Google is technically able to cross-reference cookies across its information-rich product line to make dossiers on individuals. However, most e-mail systems make use of server-side content scanning in order to check for spam . [41] [42] Privacy advocates also regard the lack of disclosed data retention and correlation policies as problematic. Google has the ability to combine information contained in a person's e-mail messages with information from Internet searches. Google has not confirmed how long such information is kept or how it can be used. One of the concerns is that it could be of interest to law enforcement agencies. More than 30 privacy and civil liberties organizations have urged Google to suspend Gmail service until these issues are resolved. [43] Gmail's privacy policy contains the clause: &quot;residual copies of deleted messages and accounts may take up to 60 days to be deleted from our active servers and may remain in our offline backup systems&quot;. Google points out that Gmail adheres to most industry-wide practices. Google has stated that they will &quot;make reasonable efforts to remove deleted information from our systems as quickly as is practical.&quot; [44] [45] Google defends its position by citing their use of email-scanning to the user's benefit. Google states that Gmail refrains from displaying ads next to potentially sensitive messages such as those that mention tragedy, catastrophe, or death. [4 Thursday, December 9, 2010 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- Consumer Watchdogs Flog Google's Privacy Policy (2008) http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2008/06/consumer-watchdogs-flog-google.php Google originally placed a cookie on each registered user's computer, which can be used to track that person's search history, and that cookie was not set to expire until 2038 . [12] As of 2007, Google's cookie now expires in two years but renews itself when a Google service is used. [12] There is no evidence that Google turns over information to the FBI or the NSA , though some users remain anxious about the possibility. [12] In response, Google claims cookies are necessary to maintain user preferences between sessions and offer other search features. Other popular search engines, such as Yahoo! Search and Microsoft 's Bing , use cookies with distant expiration dates as well. Privacy International has raised concerns regarding the dangers and privacy implications of having a centrally-located, widely popular data warehouse of millions of Internet users' searches, and how under controversial existing U.S. law, Google can be forced to hand over all such information to the U.S. government [13] . In early 2005, the United States Department of Justice filed a motion in federal court to force Google to comply with a subpoena for, &quot;the text of each search string entered onto Google's search engine over a one-week period (absent any information identifying the person who entered such query).&quot; [14] Google fought the subpoena, due to concerns about users' privacy. [15] In March 2006, the court ruled partially in Google's favor, recognizing the privacy implications of turning over search terms and refusing to grant access. [16] Steve Ballmer [17] , Liz Figueroa [18] , Mark Rasch [19] , and the editors of Google Watch [20] believe the processing of email message content by Google's Gmail service goes beyond proper use. Google claims that mail sent to or from Gmail is never read by a human being beyond the account holder, and is only used to improve relevance of advertisements. [21] Whether Google is the only one doing this or simply the only one who publicly admits it is unknown, since the privacy policies of other popular email services, like Hotmail and Yahoo , allows for collection and utilizing of personal information for ads when using their services, but do not specify precisely what information and which services [22] [23] . Google's online map service, &quot;Street View&quot; has been accused of taking pictures and coming too close inside people's private homes and/or people who walk down the street not knowing they are being watched on Google's service. [24] [25] Aaron and Christine Boring, a Pittsburgh couple, sued Google for &quot;invasion of privacy&quot;. They claimed that Street View made a photo of their home available online, and it diminished the value of their house, which was purchased for its privacy. [26] They lost their case in a Pennsylvania court. &quot;While it is easy to imagine that many whose property appears on Google's virtual maps resent the privacy implications, it is hard to believe that any – other than the most exquisitely sensitive – would suffer shame or humiliation,&quot; Judge Hay ruled. [27] In its 2007 Consultation Report, Privacy International ranked Google as &quot;Hostile to Privacy&quot;, its lowest rating on their report, making Google the only company in the list to receive that ranking. [28] [29] Carl Hewitt noted that intimate personal information is a &quot;toxic asset&quot; in Google datacenters because it will lead to government regulation &quot;analogous to nuclear power plants,&quot; Consequently, he recommended that Google should perform semantic integration in clients' clouds so that client information in Google datacenters could be decrypted only by using a client's private key. [30] [ edit ] European Union European Union (EU) data protection officials (the Article 29 working party who advise the EU on privacy policy) have written to Google asking the company to justify its policy of keeping information on individuals’ internet searches for up to two years. The letter questioned whether Google has “fulfilled all the necessary requirements” on the EU laws concerning data protection. [31] The probe by the EU into the data protection issue, As of 24 May 2007 (2007 -05-24) [update] is continuing. On 1 June Google agreed that its privacy policy is vague, and that they are constantly working at making it clearer to users. [32] The resulting modifications to its privacy policies have been met with praise [33] . [ edit ] Norway The Data Inspectorate of Norway (Norway is not a member of the EU ) has investigated Google (and others) and has stated that the 18- to 24-month period for retaining data proposed by Google was too long. [34] Thursday, December 9, 2010 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- Shop Local from fabbio cc by sa
- Seamour Sheep + MacBook from Andy Woo cc by nc sa
- as train goes by... from atzu cc by nc sa
- secret by MistoAcrilico secret from MistoAcrilico cc by nc
- phre⋅nol⋅o⋅gy 6 by Gobble Monster cc by nc sa
- Who Else Has A Bright Idea? by nhuisman cc by nc sa
- Lost by Stéfan cc by nc sa
- 01 students in anatomy class in lecture hall by blacque_jacques cc by nc sa
- line by Bright Tal cc by nc sa
- Lincoln in the light by mr_mayer cc by nc sa
- Sheep standing in the cold from P!XELTREE cc by nc sa
- we see what we want from richie preiss cc by nc sa
- Rust Off from mtsofan cc by nc sa
- Iceberg from sweart cc by nc sa
- Before you go, can you read my... from YamiPaperDreams!.- cc by nc sa
- I just couldn’t live with myself... from Eric &quot;Claptøn&quot; Nelsøn cc by nc sa