See the chapter opener “learning from mistakes.” Introduces the concepts of romantic leadership versus the resource perspective. Even innovative firms struggle in the marketplace if they do not anticipate and respond proactively to changes in the environment. Today’s leaders face a large number of complex challenges in the global marketplace. In considering how much credit (or blame) they deserve, two perspectives of leadership immediately come to mind: the “romantic” and “external control” perspectives.
Romantic view of leadership = situations in which the leader is the key force determining the organization’s success – or lack thereof.
External control view of leadership = situations in which external forces – where the leader has limited influence – determine the organization’s success.
BUT leaders CAN make a difference.
Although many might think that the leader is the most important factor in determining organizational outcomes, external factors may positively (or negatively) affect a firm’s success. For instance, developments in the general environment, such as economic downturns, new technologies, government legislation, or an outbreak of major internal conflict or war, can greatly restrict the strategic choices that are available to a firm’s executives.
The Affordable Care Act is a major piece of legislation with far-reaching consequences for businesses in the United States. The healthcare industry has seen structural changes such as consolidations of hospitals, increases in physicians employed by hospitals, and expanded service lines (e.g., hospitals offering health insurance). Large hospital systems have responded by acquiring other hospitals, improving quality by standardizing processes, and taking steps to become Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) in order to optimize the changes in Medicare. Smaller organizations are faced with constraints due to resource limitations and local environmental issues (e.g., location). If an organization can become an ACO, this will reduce the financial risk, but requires a good understanding of assigned patients’ healthcare status, effective preventive care programs, and information technology systems that monitor patient activities. In addition, new strategies are necessary to ensure success of the new law and achieve projected returns on the large investments made. Executives must acknowledge external environmental forces such as understanding the behavior of healthcare consumers, appreciating the vested interest of health insurers and pharmaceutical companies, investing in information technology to create centers of excellence that can address point of care and delivery site changes for major health care procedures. Obviously, the Affordable Care Act has both positive and negative implications, in both the long- and short-term, for organizations, and leaders, in multiple industries. (See the Extra Example in the Instructor’s Manual of a surgeon’s perspective on this Act.)
Strategic management = the analyses, decisions, and actions an organization undertakes in order to create and sustain competitive advantages. Strategic management is the study of why some firms outperform others. Strategy = the ideas, decisions, and actions that enable a firm to succeed.
Competitive advantage = a firm’s resources and capabilities that enable it to overcome the competitive forces in its industry(ies).
Operational effectiveness = performing similar activities better than rivals; sustainable competitive advantage is possible only by performing different activities from rivals, or performing similar activities in different ways.
Stakeholders = individuals, groups, and organizations who have a stake in the success of the organization, including owners (shareholders in a publicly held corporation), employees, customers, suppliers, and the community at large. Efficiency = performing actions at a low cost relative to a benchmark, or “doing things right.” Effectiveness = tailoring actions to the needs of an organization rather than wasting effort, or “doing the right thing.”
Ambidexterity = the challenge managers face of both aligning resources to take advantage of existing product markets and proactively exploring new opportunities.
Answer: A. See pg. 10-11. Henry Mintzberg, a management scholar at McGill University, argues that viewing the strategic management process as one in which analysis is followed by optimal decisions and their subsequent meticulous implementation neither describes the strategic management process accurately nor prescribes ideal practice. He sees the business environment as far from predictable, thus limiting our ability for analysis. For a variety of reasons, the intended strategy rarely survives in its original form. Unforeseen environmental developments, unanticipated resource constraints, or changes in managerial preferences may result in at least some parts of the intended strategy remaining unrealized. Thus, the final realized strategy of any firm is a combination of deliberate and emergent strategies.
Intended strategy = strategy in which organizational decisions are determined only by analysis. Realized strategy = strategy in which organizational decisions are determined by both analysis and unforeseen environmental developments, unanticipated resource constraints, and/or changes in managerial preferences.
The final realized strategy of any firm is a combination of deliberate and emergent strategies.
The Strategic Management Process involves strategy analysis, strategy formulation, and strategy implementation.
See the Sidebar – Learning from Mistakes, at the beginning of the chapter. Might some of Groupon’s performance issues have been avoided if leadership had paid careful attention to the strategic management process, specifically analysis, formulation, and implementation of its initial strategy? Groupon failed to recognize how easy it was for rivals to imitate their business, because of the extremely low entry barriers. In addition to guarding against unrealistic growth expectations, leaders must also make sure appropriate controls are in place; at Groupon that meant establishing accounting practices that would monitor marketing costs against revenue adjusted for refunds. In addition, the business model must be adjusted for industry realities: Groupon’s business was very difficult to scale, given the need to hire extensively in order to solicit new business. Also see http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/13/4079280/greed-is-groupon-can-anyone-save-the-company-from-itself and http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/columnist/shinal/2015/05/06/groupon-ipo-shares-growth-shinal/70892740/ For an interesting comparison story, see Case 15: Zynga, where CEO mis-steps and a questionable business model face extensive competition in a volatile industry.
Strategy Analysis = study of firms’ external and internal environments, and their fit with organizational vision and goals. Consider using Case 1: Robin Hood, or Case 23: QVC to illustrate how the whole strategic management process works, starting with strategy analysis. Case 19: The Casino Industry gives a good overview of the importance of external environmental analysis (addressing concepts covered in Chapter 2.)
Chapter 1 = Analyzing Organizational Goals and Objectives
Chapter 2 = Analyzing the External Environment of the Firm
Chapter 3 = Assessing the Internal Environment of the Firm
Chapter 4 = Assessing a Firm’s Intellectual Assets
Strategy Formulation = decisions made by firms regarding investments, commitments, and other aspects of operations that create and sustain competitive advantage. Involves questions about what businesses to compete in, and how to manage these businesses in order to achieve synergy – how they can create more value by working together than by operating as stand-alone businesses. Requires international strategies and entrepreneurial initiatives that can recognize viable opportunities.
Chapter 7 = Formulating International Strategy
Chapter 8 = Entrepreneurial Strategy and Competitive Dynamics
Strategy Implementation = actions made by firms that carry out the formulated strategy, including strategic controls, organizational design, and leadership.
Chapter 9 = Strategic Control and Corporate Governance
Chapter 11 = Creating a Learning Organization and an Ethical Organization
Chapter 12 = Fostering Corporate Entrepreneurship
Strategic management – the analysis, formulation & implementation of strategy – requires an effective & appropriate organizational design – a STRUCTURE that can allow for these strategic activities to take place. According to economist Milton Friedman, the overall purpose of a public corporation is to maximize the long-term return to the owners (shareholders). But who is really responsible for fulfilling this purpose?
The board of directors (BOD) provides detailed procedures for formal evaluation of directors and the firm’s top officers. Such guidelines serve to ensure that management is acting in the best interests of shareholders. Chapter 9 highlights important internal and external control mechanisms to ensure effective corporate governance.
In addition to shareholders, there are other stakeholders (e.g. suppliers, customers) who must be taken into account in the strategic management process. A stakeholder can be defined as an individual or group, inside or outside the company, that has a stake in and can influence an organization’s performance. Each stakeholder group makes various claims on the company. Stakeholder management = a firm’s strategy for recognizing and responding to the interests of all its salient stakeholders.
Zero-sum view of stakeholder management is rooted, in part, in the traditional conflict between workers and management, leading to the formation of unions and sometimes ending in adversarial union – management negotiations and long bitter strikes. The stakeholder challenges facing Walmart is an example of this. However, organizations can achieve mutual benefit through stakeholder symbiosis. The example given is how P&G considered the needs of consumers, shippers, wholesalers, and environmentalists when developing a liquid concentration for cleaning powder. This product breakthrough led not only to a change in consumer shopping habits, but also a revolution in industry supply chain economics. Leading companies are increasingly realizing that learning to partner with governments and communities, suppliers and customers, and even long-term rivals, is essential for dealing with big, complex problems. Stakeholder groups do not have to be in conflict with each other.
Answer: B. There will always be conflicting demands on organizations. However, organizations can achieve mutual benefit through stakeholder symbiosis, which recognizes that stakeholders are dependent upon each other for their success and well-being.
Social responsibility recognizes that businesses must respond to society’s expectations regarding their obligations to society. Shared value = policies and operating practices that enhance the competitiveness of a company while simultaneously advancing the economic and social conditions in which it operates. Social responsibility is not just an added cost to business. Instead businesses are creators of value that they then share with society in a mutually beneficial relationship. Triple bottom line = assessment of a firm’s financial, social, and environmental performance – accounting for the environmental and social costs of doing business. A sustainable global economy implies an economy that the planet is capable of supporting indefinitely.
Although sustainability projects are often very difficult to quantify, the story of SEKEM illustrates how visionary leadership plus an awareness of the triple bottom line – economic, environmental and social goals – can pay off in the long term. From “Making Sustainability Profitable,” by Knut Haanaes, David Michael, Jeremy Jurgens, & Subramanian Rangan, Harvard Business Review, March 2013. Executive Summary available at http://hbr.org/2013/03/making-sustainability-profitable/ar/1 “Organic products were a luxury with little market to speak of when Ibrahim Abouleish founded Sekem, Egypt’s first organic farm, in Cairo in 1977. The years Sekem spent honing sustainable cultivation practices paid off, though, in 1990, when it moved into growing organic cotton. Organic produce was entering mainstream Western stores then, and worldwide demand for all things organic began to surge. There were other advantages to the organic approach as well: Sekem’s farming techniques helped reclaim arable land from the Sahara, which had been spreading into the Nile delta. With them, the soil absorbed more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, decreasing greenhouse gases, and cotton crops needed 20% to 40% less water. In the bargain, organic techniques lowered the farm’s costs, improved average yields by almost 30%, and produced a raw cotton that was more elastic than its conventionally grown counterpart. So, far from being an expensive indulgence, organic cotton offered Sekem a business model that was more sustainable—not just environmentally but financially. In recent years that model has generated healthy revenue growth: From 2006 until the disruptions of the Arab Spring in 2011, the business posted 14% annual increases, and Sekem is now one of Egypt’s largest organic food producers.” “Rapidly developing economies are often portrayed as sustainability laggards—focused more on raising their citizens out of poverty than on protecting the environment. It’s true that their regulatory bodies can be weak, hesitant to impose restrictions on newly liberalized markets, or resentful of pressure from industrialized nations. But the developed world has never had a monopoly on visionaries, as Sekem’s story illustrates. And in markets where the pressures of resource depletion are felt most keenly, corporate sustainability efforts have become a wellspring of innovation…. many, like Sekem, took a long view, investing in initially more-expensive methods of sustainable operation that eventually led to dramatically lower costs and higher yields…. Collectively, these companies vividly demonstrate that trade-offs between economic development and environmentalism aren’t necessary. Rather, the pursuit of sustainability can be a powerful path to reinvention for all businesses facing limits on their resources and their customers’ buying power.” SEKEM's goals are to "restore and maintain the vitality of the soil and food as well as the biodiversity of nature" through sustainable, organic agriculture and to support social and cultural development in Egypt. See more at www.sekem.com.
An organization can’t succeed if only the top managers in the organization take an integrative, strategic perspective of issues facing the firm and everyone else “fends for themselves” in their independent, isolated functional areas. Instead, people throughout the organization must strive toward overall goals. No longer can organizations be effective if the top “does the thinking” and the rest of the organization “does the work.” Everyone must be involved in the strategic management process.
Hierarchy of goals = organizational goals ranging from, at the top, those that are less specific yet able to evoke powerful and compelling mental images, to, at the bottom, those that are more specific and measurable. A hierarchy of strategic goals can help an organization achieve coherence in its strategic direction. Vision = organizational goal(s) that evoke(s) powerful and compelling mental images, i.e. “Connecting the world through games” (Zynga), or “To be the happiest place on earth” (Disney) Mission statement = a set of organizational goals that include both the purpose of the organization, its scope of operations, and the basis of its competitive advantage. Strategic Objectives = a set of organizational goals that are used to operationalize the mission statement and that are specific and cover a well-defined time frame.
The hierarchy of goals has a relationship to two attributes: general versus specific (from vision to objectives), and time horizon (long-term to short-term).
Vision = organizational goal(s) that evoke(s) powerful and compelling mental images, i.e. “Connecting the world through games” (Zynga), or “To be the happiest place on earth” (Disney)
Walk doesn’t match the talk = idealistic vision can arouse employee enthusiasm but can be quickly dashed if employees find senior management’s behavior is not consistent with the vision. Irrelevance = vision created in a vacuum unrelated to environmental threats or opportunities, or not a match for organization’s resources & capabilities. Not the holy grail = managers continually search for the ONE elusive solution that will solve their firm’s problems. Too much focus = by directing people & resources toward a grandiose vision, losses can be devastating. Ideal future irreconciled with the present = visions should be anchored in current reality, need to account for the often hostile environment in which the firm competes.
Mission statement = a set of organizational goals that include both the purpose of the organization, its scope of operations, and the basis of its competitive advantage.
Strategic Objectives = a set of organizational goals that are used to operationalize the mission statement and that are specific and cover a well-defined time frame. Short-term objectives can become essential components of a firm’s “action plan,” and therefore can be critical in implementing the firm’s chosen strategy. See Chapter 9 for more details. Also see Case 1: Robin Hood for an example!