Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
Similar a FLOODS&FOSS
Similar a FLOODS&FOSS (20)
Último
Último (20)
FLOODS&FOSS
- 1. FLOOD PLAIN DELINEATION WITH FREE AND OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE Rui D. PINA ruidpina@gmail.com Prof. Alfeu Sá Marques DEC-FCTUC, April 2011 Rui Pina - ruidpina@gmail.com
- 2. WHAT IS FREE AND OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE (FOSS)? Users' freedom: run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. DEC-FCTUC, April 2011 Rui Pina - ruidpina@gmail.com
- 3. WHAT IS FOSS? “It is a gift culture, where the basics are taken care of and social status is gained by giving things away, rather than accumulating.” (Harvey and Han, 2002) DEC-FCTUC, April 2011 Rui Pina - ruidpina@gmail.com
- 4. FOSS4G http://www.osgeo.org/ DEC-FCTUC, April 2011 Rui Pina - ruidpina@gmail.com
- 5. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT MODEL Public Domain project with: •Recognized dynamic rainfall- runoff simulation model •Fast development achieved •Great amount of testers •Care of social issues http://www.epa.gov/ednnrmrl/models/swmm/ DEC-FCTUC, April 2011 Rui Pina - ruidpina@gmail.com
- 6. GOAL FOSS4G SWMM DEC-FCTUC, April 2011 Rui Pina - ruidpina@gmail.com
- 7. inp.PINS Aims of integration GIS & SWMM: • Take advantage on GIS complex functions available • Better characterize the model and analyze modelling results • Data archive, access and manipulation • Visualization http://www.mapwindow.org/ https://sites.google.com/site/inppins/ DEC-FCTUC, April 2011 Rui Pina - ruidpina@gmail.com
- 8. CASE STUDY – RIBEIRA DAS HORTAS DEC-FCTUC, April 2011 Rui Pina - ruidpina@gmail.com
- 9. RIBEIRA DAS HORTAS CATCHMENT Area 13.96 km2 Perimeter 25.5km Maximum Elevation 348 m Minimum Elevation 122 m Average slope 5.7% % impervious area 40% Time of concentration (Kirpich) 110 min DEC-FCTUC, April 2011 Rui Pina - ruidpina@gmail.com
- 10. METHODOLOGY • GIS LINKED WITH SWMM: DEC-FCTUC, April 2011 Rui Pina - ruidpina@gmail.com
- 11. Hy dro Flow coefficients Floodplains Depression storage lo g Infiltration parameters MM ica (Horton method) lc ha SW rac ter i za ti on Physical characterization Area, Length, Width, Slope, %IMP, XS DEC-FCTUC, April 2011 Rui Pina - ruidpina@gmail.com
- 12. GIS EXAMPLES DEC-FCTUC, April 2011 Rui Pina - ruidpina@gmail.com
- 13. inp.PINS DEC-FCTUC, April 2011 Rui Pina - ruidpina@gmail.com
- 14. inp.PINS DEC-FCTUC, April 2011 Rui Pina - ruidpina@gmail.com
- 15. FLOODPLAINS Directive 2007/60/EC “(18) Member States should base their assessments, maps and plans on appropriate ‘best practice’ and ‘best available technologies’ not entailing excessive costs in the field of flood risk management.” DEC-FCTUC, April 2011 Rui Pina - ruidpina@gmail.com
- 16. inp.PINS with 6 months worldwilde https://sites.google.com/site/inppins/ > 300 downloads from http://www.mapwindow.org/ DEC-FCTUC, April 2011 Rui Pina - ruidpina@gmail.com
- 17. CONCLUSIONS • inp.PINS – interoperability between GIS & SWMM • FOSS advantages: – Reduced costs – Tools adapted to users' needs – Standards: interoperability • FUTURE WORK: EPANET • LIMITATIONS: – Dependent on EPA software developments DEC-FCTUC, April 2011 Rui Pina - ruidpina@gmail.com