A conjecture about
How to use Juergen Habermas' criteria for non-dominative discourse to filter dis-educational stuff from public media democratically on the Internet
1. ?? HOW TO LEGITMATELY FILTER OUT AESTHETICALLY TOO-POTENT PATHOGENIC ADDICTION-FORMING MESSAGES IN PUBLIC MEDIA By Gary Boyd and Vladimir Zeman Concordia University, Montreal Canada For IIAS 2009 Baden Baden 08/17/09
2.
3.
4. OVERALL AIM: LONG-TERM PLEASANT HUMAN VIABILITY THROUGH UNIVERSAL PUBLIC EDUCATION for CO-CULTURAL & ECOLOGICAL SYMBIOSES = SYMVIABILITY 08/17/09
5. PROBLEM: - DIS-EDUCATION BY UBIQUITOUS, POTENT S EDUCTIVE, HYPER- CONSUMPTIVE LIFESTYLE PUSHING ADVERTAINMENT MEDIA 08/17/09
6. “ Silencing murderous messages is not as easy as it sounds.” The Economist 25/07/2009
7.
8. 08/17/09 ART as Lovely COLLECTIVE SOUL evolution Versus – hyper-individualistic Crimepetitive Parasitism ? Both ?
9. “ NEWS COVERAGE” THAT AMOUNTS TO overwhelming CENSORSHIP BY NOISE 08/17/09
10. WHAT OTHERS HAVE DONE – BY WAY OF CENSORSHIP, ALAS, HAS NOT WORKED DEMOCRATICALLY , NOR FREQUENTLY RECENTLY EVEN AT ALL! 08/17/09 Nedia of Tehran