How to Get Started in Social Media for Art League City
Moyers june8-plenary
1. Be careful what you hear: Increasing motivation for change by influencing client speech Theresa B. Moyers, Ph.D. Department of Psychology Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse and Additions University of New Mexico
14. Does Client Change Talk Mediate MI and Drinking Outcome Relationship? Motivational Interviewing Client Change Talk Drinking Outcome Using Baron & Kinney’s model for mediation
15. Does Client Change Talk Mediate MI and Drinking Outcome Relationship? Motivational Interviewing Client Change Talk Drinking Outcome d=.77 Hettema, Steele & Miller, 2005
16. Evidence of Association Between MI and Client Change Talk Motivational Interviewing Client Change Talk Intervention Test Catley, et al., 2006 Houck & Moyers, 2008
17. Does Client Change Talk Mediate MI and Drinking Outcome Relationship? Client Change Talk Drinking Outcome Mediator and Change Test Aharonovich et al., 2009 Amrhein et al., 2003 Baer, et al., 2008 Gaume, Gmel & Daeppen, 2008 Hodgins et al., 2009 Moyers, et al., 2007 Pollack et al., 2009 Strang & McCambridge, 2008
35. Demographics: Elicit Wave One 38 (36.9%) In recovery 24.37 (9.64) Hours/week treating SA clients 82 (82.0%) White 9 (9.0%) African American 4 (4.0%) Other 1 (1.0%) Asian American 4 (4.0%) American Indian/ Alaska Native Ethnicity 64 (63.4%) Female 37 (36.6%) Male Sex 44.45 (10.01) Age M (SD) / n (%) Variable
These person centered elements of MI can be (and are) hypothesized to be causal mechanisms of this treatment, in and of themselves. Previous work in our lab shows a link between therapist interpersonal skills (including empathy) and client engagement in MI. sessions. New work by Pollack has shown a relationship between the therapist’s adherence to the spirit of MI and the client’s dietary outcomes (Pollack cite).
Aharonovich: cocaine, strength Hodgins: gambling, strength Baer: substance use, frequency Gaume: ER, alcohol and marijuana, frequency
Differences in upper-level variables lead to changes in lower-level variables. Differences in training group will (we hope) lead to changes in variables at the participant level. Differences within participants will lead to changes in MI skill across time. We don’t expect substantial differences based on wave (we hope), but have to include it in the model to detect any effects.
Hope to see something like this at the end of the study
This is ugly, but then it’s demographics…
Changes from post to 3 month probably represent effects of feedback and coaching
Changes from post to 3 month probably represent effects of feedback and coaching
Differences in upper-level variables lead to changes in lower-level variables. Differences in training group will (we hope) lead to changes in variables at the participant level. Differences within participants will lead to changes in MI skill across time. We don’t expect substantial differences based on wave (we hope), but have to include it in the model to detect any effects.