The truth is that every payment method involves risk. Managing payment risks in merchandising transactions is very important. The major risks are fraud and operational risk.
chapter 5.pptx: drainage and irrigation engineering
Merchandising Transactions and Managing Payment Risk
1.
2.
3. Not fully conversant with the financial status of the buyer
To receive payment as early as possible without disturbing his
funds flow
If required, to avail credit facilities with financial institutions at
the cheapest interest rates against the receivables
If it is an export - Not fully aware about the legal formalities
prevailing in buyer’s country
If it is a service provider – delayed settlement of receivables
To receive correct amount - in the desired currency - in his
own place at the right time
4. To receive the same consignment at the right place
Not to pay until the consignment is received at his
end
to defer the payment as far as possible
to avail cheapest credit facility from any financial
institution at concessional rate of interest for the
payables…
5. With all these risks and uncertainties, trade
is continuously growing with no boundaries
Who takes the risk .. the buyer, the seller or
both or the intermediaries ?
How do they manage the receivables and
the outstanding ?
At what cost….
8. Sale / purchase contract is a document
recording the terms of delivery and terms of
payment
Who will bear the expenses / risk factors up to
which stage
Whether transport charges will be for the buyer or
seller’s account
Transit risk will be covered by marine insurance at
whose expense
At which stage transfer of title of the goods will
take place
9. 2
Remitting Bank Collecting bank
1
Submission
of
documents
Documents forwarded
3
Documents
Presented
COMMERCIAL CONTRACT
Seller buyer
10. 2
Remitting Bank Collecting Bank
1
Submission
of
documents
Documents forwarded
3
Documents
Presented
4
Payment
made
5
6
Payment Transferred
Payment
made to
Exporter
SALE CONTRACT
seller Buyer
11. If the buyer refuses to accept the documents and not paying –
Seller
To offer discount
To search for an alternate buyer offering the goods with or
without discount
If alternate buyer not found, goods are to be re-booked
Expenses – transport charges, freight charges, bank
charges….Cost of funds
Or abandon the goods…..
Documents are safe but payment not assured
13. 3
Sellers Bank Buyers Bank
2
Submission
of
Draft /
Bill of
Exchange
Documents forwarded
4
Documents
Presented
Goods consigned directly
1
SALE CONTRACTSeller buyer
14. 3
Sellers Bank Buyers Bank
2
Submission
of
Draft /
Bill of
Exchange
Documents forwarded
4
Documents
Presented
5
Payment
made
6
7
Payment Transferred
Payment
made to
Exporter
Goods consigned directly
1
SALE CONTRACTseller buyer
15. Seller should have absolute faith and
confidence on the buyer… since goods are
directly consigned.
Payment on due date by buyer
If defaulted…. No assurance
Has to resort to legal procedures
17. No control on the goods since it is directly
consigned to buyer
Documents are also forwarded directly to the buyer
… Only if the Seller has absolute confidence on the
buyer’s capacity to pay..this method will be suitable;
Otherwise… this will be more risky
18. Transaction is covered under Indian Contract Act
1872.
Bank is appointed as an agent for collection by the
seller
Bank does not assume any responsibility for credit
protection
Seller has to proceed against the buyer for non-
fulfillment of contractual obligations under civil suit.
In case of exports – no legal support except ICC
Paris guidelines on collection documents
20. Buyer remits the payment in advance
Receiving the consignment or getting back
the payment if shipment never takes place
will be the risk for the buyer
Seller enjoys buyer’s funds
21. To manage the receivables with lesser
risks corporate may opt for any of these
payment methods:
› Letter of Credit / Documentary Credit
Inland / Foreign
› Guarantees / Standby credits
Inland / Foreign
22. Establishing Letter of Credit
SALE CONTRACT
1 2 3
1. LC application submitted by the applicant to the issuing bank
2. LC established by issuing bank through their correspondent
bank with a request to pay on their behalf against submission
of prescribed documents by the beneficiary
3. LC advised- with /without confirmation
ISSUING
BANK
CONFIRMING /
ADVISING
BANK
buyer seller
24. NEGOTIATION OF DOCUMENTS IN
UNCONFIRMED CREDITS
ISSUING
BANK
NEGOTIATING
BANK
1
2
35
6 4
buyer
seller
25. An arrangement whereby a bank acting at the
request and on instructions of a customer i.e.,
the applicant / buyer
To make payment to a third party (the
beneficiary) by themselves or authorize other
bank to pay or negotiate
Against stipulated documents
Provided
Terms and conditions of the credit are complied
with
26. Inland letter of credit - discounting
Issuing bank Sellers Bank
1
2
35
6 4buyer
seller
27. Bill of Exchange
Commercial Invoice
Transport document
Inspection certificate
Insurance
Certificate of origin (in foreign trade)
28. 4
Exporter’s Bank Issuing Bank
2
Submission
of
Draft /
Bill of
Exchange
Documents forwarded
7
Documents
Presented
8
Payment
made
5
6
Payment made
Payment
made to
Exporter
Goods consigned directly
1
Payment demanded on due date and defaulted by
importer
3
Standby credit
seller buyer
29. Promise to honour beneficiary’s presentation
of a document indicating the default of the
applicant
Act as a standby arrangement in case the
obligation is not fulfilled by the applicant
30. MORE USEFUL IN COLLECTION
INSTRUMENTS.
TO PRESENT A COPY OF COMMERCIAL
INVOICE & UNPAID BILL OF EXCHANGE
31. In respect of any debt,obligation or any
liability by the overseas party in connection
with bonafide trade transaction
As a back up instrument for collection
ICC 500 & ISP 98 are the governing
guidelines
34. FINANCIAL / PERFORMANCE /DPG
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FIN/PERF
GUARANTEES
TYPES OF GUARANTEES –RECEIVABLES
AND PAYABLES
CHECK POINTS
35. PURPOSE – SPECIFIC
VALIDITY PERIOD
CLAIM PERIOD
VALUE
LIMITATION CLAUSE
REASONS FOR INVOKING – SPECIFIC
HOW TO EXTINGUISH THE LIABLITY
36. TYPE
STATUS OF THE IB
DOCUMENTARY CONDITIONS
DOCUMENTS TO BE SPECIFIED
REINSTATEMENT CLAUSE
CHARGES
INTEREST FACTOR
37. Advantages
Wrongful dishonour
Rightful dishonour
Implications of dishonour
› Criminal
› N I law (Amendment) Act 1988
38. IPC 415 CHEATING
IPC 417 PUNISHMENT FOR CHEATING
IPC 420 CHEATING AND DISHONESTLY
INDUCING FOR DELY OF PROPERTY –
7YEARS
SEC 2 & 11 DEFINES ‘PERSONS’ – CO,
ASSNS, BODY OR PERSONS WHETHER
INCORPORATED OR NOT
39. Sec 138 – dishonour of cheques
› For insufficient balance
› Exceeds arrangement
› Account closed
› Payment stopped by drawer
Issuing notice by the drawer to the payee not to
present the cheque – but the payee presents the
cheque – dishonoured – can the drawer prosecuted?
Modi cements vs Kuchil kumar -1998
Drawer can easily get rid of the consequences.. Hence stop
payment will not preclude action under Sec 138
Non cognizable offence
40. Cheque to be presented within 6 months or expiry date
whichever is earlier
Payee or holder in due course makes a demand to drawer
within 30 days from date of receipt of the returned instrument
Drawer’s failure to pay within 15 days of receipt of notice
Non-payment leads to ‘cause of action’
Complaint to be registered within one month of the ‘cause of
action’
Period of one month should be from the day immediately
following the day on which the period of 15 days from the date of
receipt of the notice by the drawer expired.. Supreme Court
judgement in Prem Chand Vs Yashpal Singh
No court lower to that of Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial
Magistrate of I class will try the offence
41. Complaint in writing
With dishonoured cheque / return memo / copy of notice / evidence
for receipt of notice by the drawer
› Sec 146 conveys ‘Bank’s slip prima facie evidence of certain facts –
court will presume the fact of dishonour of such cheques until such fact
is disproved’
› Sec 147 – every offence punishable under this act is compoundable
To be filed either where cheque is issued / dishonoured
With metropolitan magistrate/ judicial magistrate/ I class magistrate
42. Drawer can be punished only if he could not
pay during the notice period
Not for dishonour of cheque
Punishment
› Twice the cheque value
› Two years imprisonment
43. Sec 141 of NI Act – every person of a company in
charge of and responsible for business shall be
deemed guilty
Recent Supreme Court judgment by Arun Kumai in
› Appeal by SMS Pharmaceuticals
› Only directors responsible for the particular deal would be
liable under NI Act
› No universal rule that a director of a company is in
charge of its every day affairs…
› Depends upon the respective roles assigned to the
officers in a company