Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
Similar a JMSB MBA ICC 2019_Info session_New Judges
Similar a JMSB MBA ICC 2019_Info session_New Judges (20)
Último
Último (20)
JMSB MBA ICC 2019_Info session_New Judges
- 1. Information Session New Judges December 5th 2018
- 2. Welcome to the Executive MBA Sponsored Breakfast Patrick Kelley Executive Director, Corporate Relations Sharon Nelson Assistant Director
- 3. The John Molson Executive MBA • Proud sponsor of the 39th MBA International Case Competition • Many judges are graduates of JMSB’s MBA and EMBA – we welcome you back as our ambassadors! • As involved members of the Montreal business community, you understand the value of graduate business education • Let us briefly introduce the JMSB EMBA
- 4. The John Molson Executive MBA • First EMBA in Quebec – founded in 1985 • Extensive network of 900 EMBA alumni around the world • Boutique EMBA with a carefully selected cohort of 20 participants (on average) from a wide range of industries, encouraging classroom discussions and interactions
- 5. EMBA Curriculum & Schedule • A rigorous academic program • Many hands-on and practical components and complementary features • One day per week schedule (alternate Fridays and Saturdays) • 15 months of class time (over 20 months)
- 6. EMBA: ROI for employers & employees Beyond the business administration curriculum… • Broaden participants’ knowledge beyond their industrial sector • Further develop a wide of range of skills - Problem solving - Communication - Time management • Exposure to leading best practices, weekly • Gain confidence, on a personal & professional level
- 7. Questions? Contact us Andrea Limbardi, EMBA 2016 Vice President Strategic Initiatives at Indigo Rui Lopez, EMBA 2002 Director Business Marketing at Elekta concordia.ca/emba
- 8. JUDGES, CASES & EVENTS JULIA GALBRAITH
- 9. • History of the Competition • Organizing Team • Our Internal Stakeholders • Key Elements of the Competition • Competition Format • Judges’ Roles and Responsibilities • Team Evaluation and Match Scoring • Demonstration of Online Team Evaluation Form • FAQs • Final Words New Judge Information Session Outline
- 10. Ankit Kumar, Marketing 2019 MBA ICC Organizing Team Geneviève Roch, Sustainability & Hospitality Suite Julia Galbraith, Judges, Cases & Events Isabelle Bittar, Judges Evan Baker, Volunteers Juan Perez Rosario, Schools, Volunteers & Sustainability Vikram Vetagiri, Budget, Hotel, IT & Logistics JD Haitsma, Logistics Johane Nouala, Sponsorship
- 11. Ken Brooks, EY Antoine Soszynski, JP Morgan Diane Belliveau, BDC Chris Chandler, Access Cash The Board of Directors Serge Z. Helou, Bombardier Jean Béland, RBC, Retired Regis J. Rehel, Elopack Ron Dahms, Success Finder Dr. Anne-Marie Croteau, JMSB Andrea Polatos, SNC Lavalin Diane Lanctôt, Lanctôt LTD Bill Meder, Advisor Katherine Crew, TEC Canada Anne Beaudry, JMSB Patrick Lauzon, Attraction Group
- 12. • $213,950 raisedSponsors • 36 top MBA programs from 20 countriesCompetitors • 350 local business executivesJudges • 300 students from various faculties and schoolsVolunteers • 5 regular cases, 1 short case, 1 live caseCases Key Elements of the Competition
- 13. Sunday 6-Jan Monday 7-Jan Tuesday 8-Jan Wednesday 9-Jan Thursday 10-Jan Friday 11-Jan Opening Reception/ Cocktail Hockey Game vs Minnesota Wild Mange & Mélange Coaches’ Dinner Networking Cocktail Theme Party: Heroes & Villians Final Banquet After Party Hotel Bell Centre Vargas Hotel Hotel Hotel 2019 EVENTS
- 15. • Not-for-profit organization •Expenses of $312,950 Sponsorship Cash Sponsorhip, $133,250 In-kind, $39,500 Schools Registration Fee, $99,000 Donors, $41,200
- 16. Our Sponsors
- 17. JUAN PEREZ ROSARIO Schools, Volunteers & Sustainability
- 18. Australia Brazil Canada China Dominican Republic Finland Germany Ireland Israel Lebanon Mexico Netherlands Portugal Singapore South Africa South Korea Sweden UK USA Uruguay
- 19. LEAD VOLUNTEERS: Work Directly with Organizing Team TEAM HOSTS: Escort Teams & Enforce Rules SUPPORT VOLUNTEERS: Ensure Smooth Running of Assigned Tasks JUDGE COORDINATORS: Escort Judges & Coordinate Presentations 300+ Volunteers HOSPITALITY SUITE SUSTAINABILITY
- 20. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Finals: Winners of each Semi-Final match Prize money of $10,000 for 1st place Teams 1, 4, 7 Teams 2, 5, 8 Teams 3, 6, 9 * Wild card = team with the following highest scores Round Robin 6 divisions of 6 teams each – a team competes once against each team in their division Competition Format Semi-Finals: Total of 9 teams: Winners of Divisions 1 to 6 + three wild cards* (7 to 9)
- 21. The 2019 ICC Theme Disruption Venue Hotel Bonaventure https://mbacasecomp.com/competition/events/ January 7th January 8th January 9th January 10th January 11th 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 Final Networking Cocktail Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Live Case Case 5 Semi-Final Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
- 22. REGULAR CASES Case Writing Competition to select 5 cases plus one backup Unpublished, untested cases dealing with real current business issues 20-pg case + appendices Teams have 3h to prep SHORT CASES Short Case Writing Competition to select one short case 4-pg think-on- your-feet case Teams have 1.5h to prep LIVE CASE Case revolving around a real company’s current challenge Company executives present the case live Identity of the company kept secret until the day of CASES
- 23. It is imperative that business students are cognizant of how disruptive business models are shaping the future. Selection will favour relevant and timely cases that demonstrate the challenges business school graduates will face in the years to come. There are many factors both within a company and the external environment that can have a disruptive effect on a business, a business model or an industry and case writers are encouraged to submit cases where managers/owners are facing the opportunities and challenges of either being “Disrupters” or dealing with the consequences of being “Disrupted.” It is our intention to emphasize the wide range of this theme, as well as its application, and although Technology has been a key element and a prime mover in the disruption of many businesses and business models over time, we do invite case writers to consider a broader definition of the term “Disruption.” Theme: DISRUPTION
- 24. Preparation & Presentation Times For each case, a team has: Regular Case Short Case Preparation Time Presentation Time Q&A 3 hours 25 minutes 15 minutes 1.5 hours 15 minutes 10 minutes
- 26. Based on the scoring criteria: • Position & size of the company • Experience • Education • Respected member of the community • Commitment to judging the week of the competition Judges’ Recruitment – WHO
- 27. BREAKDOWN OF JUDGES 2019 Key Statistics: 360 Judges 47% Women 19% IT Background 122 New Judges 10% 26% 64% Consultant, Professor and other Director, Senior Manager President, VP, C- Level Executive and Executive Directors
- 28. TIME DURATION ACTIVITY 9:00 – 10:50 2 h Arrive at Judges’ Room Sit and Read Case with the Members of Your Panel Discuss with Case Briefer 11:00 - 11:25 25 min Team 1 Presentation (Team 2 is not in room) 11:25 - 11:40 15 min Team 1 Q&A Session 11:50 - 12:15 25 min Team 2 Presentation (Team 1 may stay in room) 12:15 – 12:30 15 min Team 2 Q&A Session 12:30 – 1:30 1 h Judge Deliberation Period A Typical Day for a Judge
- 29. We are Counting on You! • Must arrive on time • No replacements • Judges who no show are not re-invited for future competitions • If anything: Contact Us! Isabelle Bittar Julia Galbraith 514-531-6950 isabelle.bittar@mbacasecomp 416-931-4731 julia.galbraith@mbacasecomp
- 30. Preparation • Review sequence of activities & judging procedures with panel Q&A Session • Open Q&A session after each presentation Deliberation Period • Initiate discussion during evaluation period • Manage time given for deliberation • Complete online evaluation form & include feedback for each category Lead Judge’s Role
- 31. Dos and Don’ts in the Presentation Room Role Dos Don’ts Introduction Introduce yourself •Short intro (name, position & company) •Long intro (> 30 sec) Presentation Listen •Listen attentively •Listen passively •Be open minded • Communicate verbally & non- verbally•Write down comments & qs for Q&A Q&A Session Ask questions •Be culturally sensitive •Lead the conversation •Ensure clarity in question formulation •Undermine participants •Demonstrate patience when seeking an answer •Move on too quickly •Initiate a debate Deliberation Period Deliberate •Support decisions with concrete examples •Fixate on one solution based on preconceived notion •Consider the alternatives •Penalize teams who appoint one member to answer questions Evaluation Provide feedback •Provide constructive criticism & detailed comments •Provide short, vague sentences & general comments •Point out development opportunities and how presentation could have been improved •Discuss case with participants
- 32. Category (Assigned Score 1-10) Weight Multiplier Presentation x 1 Analysis & Development of Alternatives x 2 Recommendation(s) x 2.5 Implementation x 3 Question Period x 1.5 Team Evaluation Criteria * A score in the midrange of a category indicates that the team met the judges’ expectations.
- 33. Comparing Cumulative Evaluation Scores 11 Match Point Split 3.4 point or less differential 6 match points to winning team 5 match points to losing team 3.5-10.4 point differential 7 match points to winning team 4 match points to losing team 10.5-20.4 point differential 8 match points to winning team 3 match points to losing team 20.5-35 point differential 9 match points to winning team 2 match points to losing team 35.5 point or more differential 10 match points to winning team 1 match point to losing team Match Scoring – Changes this Year
- 34. Match Example 1 Category Team A Team B Presentation (x1) 8 8 6 6 Analysis & Development of Alternatives (x2) 6 12 7 14 Recommendation (x2.5) 7 17.5 9 22.5 Implementation (x3) 6 18 7 21 Question Period (x1.5) 8 12 6 9 Cumulative Score 67.5 72.5 Score Differential 5 Match Points Awarded 4 7
- 35. Match Example 2 Category Team A Team B Presentation (x1) 8 8 6 6 Analysis & Development of Alternatives (x2) 6 12 7 14 Recommendation (x2.5) 5 12.5 9 22.5 Implementation (x3) 6 18 7 21 Question Period (x1.5) 6 9 8 12 Cumulative Score 59.5 75.5 Score Differential 16 Match Points Awarded 3 8
- 36. Lav Crnobrnja Online Evaluation Form
- 37. Where can I park? Access to indoor parking is located on Mansfield & corner of St-Antoine Is the hotel accessible by metro? Yes. Bonaventure & Square-Victoria What time do I need to be there? Refer to your schedule What is the dress code? Business professional Who should I tell about my food allergy? Julia & Isabelle What to bring with me? Nothing but yourself FAQs
- 38. • Wednesday, January 9 from 6:00 – 9:00pm • Mingle with sponsors, participants, volunteers, and other judges Networking Cocktail
- 39. FOLLOW US! Get the App!
- 40. Questions? See You in January! We’re Counting On You!
Notas del editor
- Today I will be introducing our organizing team and covering the key elements of our competition. Covering the roles and responsibilities, and specifically those of the lead judge. We will then review the scoring and evaluation process.
- Here is the 2017 organizing team. We’re all MBA students from the John Molson School of Business. Please remember these faces, as you will be needing us during the competition.
- Here behind me you see our board of directors – they provide invaluable experience and guidance to the organizing committee in the lead up to the competition. We couldn’t have done this without their support
- The John Molson MBA International Case Competition is a not-for-profit event organized by a team of nine MBA students from the John Molson School of Business at Concordia University in Montreal. The competition is recognized as the largest competition of its kind and teams from 36 top business schools from around the worlds compete in it annually. Its main purpose is to bridge the gap between the corporate and academic worlds. Bilingual “Olympics of case comps” The event will take place over the first week of January at the Bonaventure Hotel. Our competition consists of 4 main pillars. The first of which are our sponsors, who we partner up with each year to help raise over a ¼ of a million dollars. The second would be the schools, who we handpicked from many of the top MBA programs from around the globe. The third would be you, our judges. We rely heavily on your support and feedback to the students throughout the competition. And finally, the volunteers. Who we recruit from various faculties and schools to offer a helping hand during the fast-paced competition week
- To give you a sense of the multidimensional nature of the competition, I wanted to quickly show you the events schedule. As you can see, the week also includes attending a hockey game, a chance for participants to mix over dinner at the Mange & Melange and a costume party.
- As a non-profit student-run organization, we depend on the support of our sponsors to continue bringing a high quality event. We are almost at our target and need your help in reaching the summit. I would be happy to discuss partnership opportunities with those interested. More information on our website under the Sponsors tab with an online brochure. Donations can easily be completed online on our homepage
- As a non-profit student-run organization, we depend on the support of our sponsors to continue bringing a high quality event. We are almost at our target and need your help in reaching the summit. I would be happy to discuss partnership opportunities with those interested. More information on our website under the Sponsors tab with an online brochure. Donations can easily be completed online on our homepage
- To give you a sense of how the competition is organized: It takes the form of a “Round Robin” – there are 6 divisions composed of 6 teams who each compete once against every other team in the division over the course of 5 different cases We identify the winning team from each division, and three wildcards, who all move on to the semi-final rounds The winners of the semi final matches will then move on to compete for the top prize
- So as you can see, the 5 preliminary cases will take place over the course of 4 days (Monday to Thursday) 9 teams will advance to the semi-finals on Thursday Afternoon And 3 teams will move on to the finals on Friday morning
- As you know, our theme this year is Disruption. Here you see how the theme was communicated to case writers in the call for cases. It was our intention not to limit the concept of disruption in business, but instead to expand writers’ consideration of case topics.
- Depending on the type of case: prep time, presentation length, and the duration of the Q&A period will change Isabelle is going to walk you through the details in a few slides
- We are thrilled to have you at our competition this year. When preparing our pool of judges, we work hard to recruit the best, top leaders in the community that we believe can provide the ultimate experience to our participants. We do have a thorough evaluation process with our Board Members to review each candidate. The following criteria are used to evaluate each potential candidate for the competition. Respected member of the business community = Philantropic work Venture capital Board member Involvement in charity/not-for-profit organization Judge Selection Criteria Weight Job Position 30 C-Level Executive 30 President or Vice-President 30 General Manager or Executive Director 25 Senior Manager or Executive Manager 25 Middle-Manager with decision making authority 20 Supervisor or Team Lead 15 Consultant 15 Analyst 15 SCORE Size of Company 25 Large (> 500 employees) 25 Medium (100 to < 500 employees) 20 Small (< 100 employees) 10 SCORE Years of experience in a relevant field 25 > 15 years 25 10 to < 15 years 20 5 to < 10 years 15 > 40 years 15 SCORE Respected member of the business community 5 Philantropic work 5 Venture capital 5 Board member 5 Involvement in charity/not-for-profit organization 5 SCORE Education 10 MBA, PhD, CFA, CPA, or other Business Graduate Program 10 Bachelor of commerce or relevant business certificate 5 Graduate degree in a non-business related field 5 SCORE Commitment to judging the week of the competition 5 New judge who was referred to us, contacted us to attend, or is eager to attend 5 Judge from Sponsor Company 5 SCORE BONUS: Gender 5 Female 5 SCORE
- This year’s pool of judges has the following break down. We have 360 judges present to cover all our panels of judges throughout the competition. Not to get to much into details, but we have in total 94 panels of 5 judges each to prepare for the case competition. We are proud of our women reprensetation at the competition. 19% of our judges have experience working in the IT industry or has previously occupied an IT role. For our theme. Our pool of judges is very rich in expertises, and covers a high diversity of different industries. As you know, we asked you to submit your availaibilities for the week of the competition. Our role is to make sure to well balance our panels of judges for each case.
- New this year: panels will consist of 4-5 judges We ask that you do not look up information on the case company before hearing the competitiors’ presentations. Participants do not have access to this additional information, so having this may inadvertantly create bias in judging. Please note that all judges are expected to stay for both presentations. Judges that interrupt presentations or leave before the deliberaiton period, will not be invited back for future competitions During the deliberation the panel of judges will decide on a winner and provide written feedback for the students **this slide is unique to the new judge deck
- You may think that with 360 judges, it would not have an impact if a few do not show up. But that is wrong. We carefully plan each of our panels of judges and we are counting on you to be present once you will have confirmed the official schedule we will be sending to you. In previous years, we were sometimes forced to reduce our panels due to unplanned no-shows. This has a direct negative impact in the competition
- Each panel of judge is appointed a Lead judge. This person is usual a judges with a lot of experience with the competition. They will be your go-to person if ever you have any questions. Their main role is to open the Q&A session after each presentation and to guide the discussion between judges during the deliberation period. The new evaluation system has had an impact on the role of the lead judge. In the past, split panels were an issue, but these have been virtually eliminated. Principal role is to lead discussion on the evaluation categories and reach consensus on the ratings. The lead judge reviews the sequence of activities and judging procedures with the panel. They also chair the question period, lead the deliberations, prepare the feedback form in a complete and constructive fashion and identify both candidates for lead judge and those who do not appear to be suited to the task.
- Using the comments from our coaches, participants and judges, we have compiled a table of the judges’ roles and responsibilities, along with the dos and don’ts at each point during the judging process. Prior to the presentation, once the team of presenters arrive to the presentation room and you are given the ok from the judge coordinator to begin, please introduce yourselves. Keep the introduction short, provide your name, position and company your work for. During the presentation, I’d like to emphasize that you should be taking notes on how the team is performing, what aspects of the presentation and their analysis are strong or poor. The Q&A session is quite short (15 min), so please ensure that each judge has sufficient time to ask their question. Be culturally sensitive, clear with your question. Do not undermine the students, do not lead the discussion nor initiate a debate. Following the Q&A session, you will have 1 hour to deliberate with your panel of judges and to ensure that you have completed the online feedback form appropriately. Support your decisions with examples and consider alternative solutions. Provide constructive criticism and detailed comments, how they can improve. All participants are required to participate during the presentation portion; however, they are permitted to elect only one individual from their team to answer all the questions during the Q&A session. Once the deliberation is over, you can engage with the students but please do not discuss the case results with them.
- We introduced a new evaluation system last year. This system includes weight multipliers attached to each presentation category.
- Once both teams’ scores are entered into the system, it calculates the differential between the two scores and awards each team match points. There are 11 match points to be split between the two teams. In the past, we tried to avoid awarding 6-5s, but we’ve since relaxed this guideline.
- Judges will be able to go back and adjust scores and comments before making the final submission, but after they click "submit" and the system calculates the score, it will be final. Leads: recognize the effort that has been made to provide good feedback as evidenced by feedback from the coaches and our own review of the forms.
- I will now introduce you to Lav Crnobrnja, of Cloud Horizon, who will review the online evaluation form with you.
- As you know, we also have the networking cocktail on the Wednesday night and we hope you all can make it!