The big drawback with economics is it assume people behave like Econs. Econs are not like you an me, they are entirely rational and always act in their own best interest. They are not influenced by how other people behave, they are consistent and not influenced by emotion and are entirely capable to make rational decisions. The great thing about econs is that they work well in economic model, the drawback is they don’t exist. Even economists aren’t econs!
So what does this have to do with marketing?
Although not quite as dogmatic as economists, marketers often assume people behave like econs. Market Research is perhaps the most guilty culprit, researchers often measure what seems like plausible reasons why people do what they do and on this advice marketers. We assume respondents to be truthful, knowledgeable, rational, predictive and with perfect memories
Persuasion marketing: Assumes that we’re good at making trade-offs and rational decisions. That models on human behaviour can be built on rational grounds.
This is supported by MR that is all too happy to uncover lots of triggers and barriers for products to outcompete on. If a product fails it is because people didn’t realise what made it so good in the first place