5. Equitable Teachers …
Learn to see, hear, and understand the child
Find out about children’s strengths, experiences,
and prior knowledge
Have many tools for scaffolding understanding
Continually develop culturally responsive practices
Reinforce students’
competence and
confidence
Reach out to children
and families
8. Education Spending is
Unequal and Inadequate
California ADA Expenditures
18,000 16,583
16,000
14,000
11,222
12,000
9,480
10,000 7,863
8,000 6,457 6,360 6,182 5,913 5,741
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
e
J)
)
A)
ills
o
.
.
.
A
ag
em
em
em
sc
(S
(L
(L
H
er
i
El
El
El
nc
y
rk
on
rly
Av
le
a
Pa
o
e
as
ve
in
pt
Fr
id
lit
A
cK
lin
om
Be
a
ds
C
in
n
us
Bo
M
Sa
w
oo
C
Sa
ld
lin
W
Ba
ank
Fr
12. Policy Context
Focusing on teacher effectiveness is seen as
a promising path for education policy
New teacher evaluation systems, and
especially, “Value Added Models” (VAMs) are
promoted as tools to accomplish this goal
Policy needs to be informed by research
about what will actually improve teaching and
student outcomes
13. Professional Consensus
VAM estimates of teacher effectiveness …
should not used to make operational
decisions because such estimates are far
too unstable to be considered fair or
reliable.
– 2009 Letter Report from the
Board on Testing and Assessment,
National Research Council
14. Concerns Raised about
Value-Added Measures
Studies find that teachers’ value-added
“effectiveness” is highly variable & influenced by:
The statistical model used
The measure of achievement used
Class size, curriculum, instructional supports,
and time spent with students
Tutoring and parent supports
Student characteristics and attendance
15. A Teacher’s Measured “Effectiveness”
Can Vary Widely
YEAR 1 10 YEAR 2
10 Same high school
8
6 Same course
4 (English I)
2 1
Not a beginning
0
Decile Rank Y1 Decile Rank Y2 teacher
80
Model controls for:
60
Y1 Prior
40
Y2 achievement
20
Demographics
0
% ELL % Low- %Hispanic School fixed
income effects
16. The Unintended Effects of the EVAAS
System In Houston
Teachers teaching in grades in which English
Language Learners (ELLs) are transitioned into
mainstreamed classrooms are the least likely to show
“added value.”
Teachers teaching larger numbers of special education
students in mainstreamed classrooms are also found
to have lower “value-added” scores.
Teachers teaching students in consecutive years
report receiving bonuses for the first year and nothing
the next, as they “max out” on growth.
Teachers teaching gifted students have small gains
because their students are near the top. 16
19. Teacher Candidates Learn
I think for me the most valuable thing was the
sequencing of the lessons, teaching the
lesson, and evaluating what the kids were
getting, what the kids weren’t getting, and
having that be reflected in my next
lesson...the ‘teach-assess-teach-assess-
teach-assess’ process. And so you’re
constantly changing – you may have a plan
or a framework that you have together, but
knowing that that’s flexible and that it has to
be flexible, based on what the children learn
that day.
Linda Darling-Hammond 2011
20. Teacher Educators Learn
This [scoring] experience…has forced me to
revisit the question of what really matters in
the assessment of teachers, which – in turn –
means revisiting the question of what really
matters in the preparation of teachers.
Linda Darling-Hammond 2011
21. Cooperating Teachers
Learn
[The scoring process] forces you to be clear
about “good teaching;” what it looks like,
sounds like. It enables you to look at your
own practice critically/with new eyes.
Linda Darling-Hammond 2011
22. Teacher Education
Programs Learn …
… And change
Courses
The learning sequence
Clinical practice opportunities
Supports for candidates
23. Predictive Validity of Performance
Assessments
National Board Certification
-- Effect sizes of .04 to .20 (pass/fail)
Connecticut BEST portfolio
-- Effect size of .46 (4 point scale)
California PACT assessment
-- Effect size of .15 (44 point scale)
20 percentile point difference in student
achievement for the highest - and lowest-
scoring teacher Linda Darling-Hammond 2011
29. Personalization
Small Schools and
Learning
Communities
Reduced Pupil
Loads
Long-term
Relationships
Advisory Systems
Close parental
contact
30. Rigorous & Relevant Instruction
College Prep coursework
made relevant,
interdisciplinary, and problem-
oriented
Internships
Project-Based Learning
Performance Assessment &
Portfolios
A Culture of Revision and
Redemption
31. Professional
Collaboration & Learning
Intensive retreats
Shared planning time
Teaching teams
Regular professional
development
Inquiry about student
learning
Leadership focused on
instruction
33. Insisting on Quality Education
as a Civil Right
"On some positions, Cowardice asks the question,
'Is it safe?'
Expediency asks the question, 'Is it politic?'
And Vanity comes along and asks the question,
'Is it popular?'
But Conscience asks the question 'Is it right?'
And there comes a time when one must take a position
that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular,
But he must do it because Conscience tells him
it is right."
-Martin Luther King, Jr., "Remaining Awake Through a
Great Revolution", March 31, 1968
Notas del editor
Value-added models are designed to quantify the amount of achievement “value” teachers add to their students over the course of a school year. There are some old ideas here, but with some new vocabulary and some new statistical twists.
In 2009, the NRC’s Board on Testing and Assessment issued a letter report directed to Education Secretary Arne Duncan, commenting on the Department’s proposal on the Race to the Top Fund. That letter included strong cautions concerning value-added models, and strongly urged further research and pilot studies before mandating any operational use of these models. Since then, the evidence has continued to accumulate that these models have serious problems.
Bullet 1: One teacher noted: “I’m scared to teach in the 4 th grade. I’m scared I might lose my job if I teach in an [ELL] transition grade level, because I’m scared my scores are going to drop, and I’m going to get fired because there’s probably going to be no growth.” Another teacher noted: “When they say nobody wants to do 4 th grade – nobody wants to do 4 th grade! Nobody.” Bullet 3: A teacher noted: “I found out that I [have been] competing with myself.” Bullet 4: A gifted teacher noted: “Every year I have the highest test scores, I have fellow teachers that come up to me when they get their bonuses…One recently came up to me [and] literally cried - ‘I’m so sorry.’… I’m like, don’t be sorry…It’s not your fault. Here I am…with the highest test scores and I’m getting $0 in bonuses. It makes no sense year to year how this works…. How do I, how do I… you know… I don’t know what to do. I don’t know how to get higher than a 100%.” Another gifted teacher noted, “I have students [in a 5 th grade gifted reading class] who score at the 6 th 7 th 8 th -grade levels in reading. But I’m like please babies, score at the 9 th grade level, cause if you don’t score at the 9 th or 10 th grade or higher in 5 th grade with me, I’m going to show negative growth. Even though you, you’re gifted and you’re talented, and you’re high! I can only push you so much higher when you are already so high. I’m scared.”