1. The evidence obtained abroad and its
incorporation into the Spanish criminal
proceedings. Jurisprudential analysis.
Dr. (C). Mrs. Alicia González Monje
Project JUST/2011/ISEC/DRUGS/AG/3671

2. Differences between European criminal
procedural regulations
Difficulties on judicial cooperation to the
evidence-taking

3. Criterion of the Supreme Court
Spanish courts can not be converted in
custodians of the legality of the actions
carried out in another country of the
European Union, nor subject such evidence
to contrast with the Spanish legislation.

4. Jurisprudential Analysis
Opening packages by foreign authorities.
Controlled delivery.
Collection of evidence within International
Rogatory Commissions.
Intelligence reports.

5. The mutual recognition of evidence
outside the scope of the EU.
SAN 31/2009, of April 30
Intervention and monitoring in real-time of e-mail traffic and
its contents, directly supplied, by police request, from the
own Spanish delegation of Microsoft.
 Information received from the U.S. in compliance with
Rogatory Commission.
 Police Information provided by U.S. foreign intelligence
services.