5. The bigger picture in water
management
Ø Why planning for water matters
Ø How policy and plans join up
Ø Who is involved
Ø Opportunities to get multiple benefits
through partnerships and innovative
approaches
6. Planning for water: why does it
matter?
Too much, or too little water is bad
for business, the economy and
society:
Ø lost production and sales
Ø disrupted transport
Ø waste of resources
Ø poor quality environment and
social problems
Good planning and urban design
Ø reduces flooding
Ø increases water resilience
Ø improves water quality
Ø creates more liveable places
7. How integrated water management works in practice
Source:
WWT
and
RSPB
-‐
Sustainable
Drainage
Systems,
Maximising
the
Poten?al
for
People
and
Wildlife,
A
guide
for
Local
Authori?es
and
Developers
8. How policy and plans join up
Local
Plans
Surface
Water
Management
Plans
Water
Resource
Management
Plans
River
Basin
Management
Plans
NPPF
WFD
FWMA
Water
Acts
10. Who’s
involved?
Environment
Agency
Lead
Local
Flood
Authori@es
Local
Planning
Authori@es
Water
and
Sewerage
Companies
Highway
Authori@es
Local
wildlife
and
conserva@on
groups
Local
Communi@es
Catchment
partnerships
Natural
England
Farmers
and
land
managers
Local
Enterprise
Partnerships
Local
businesses
and
developers
11. Understand
issues
Develop
collabora?on
Build
capacity
L
P
A
IDB
LLFA
N
E
Business
Sustainable
drainage
Water
efficiency
Local
environment
How
the
Catchment
–based
approach
works:
Partnerships,
process
and
outcomes
Sustainable
development
Opportunities
Multiple benefits
Catchment
Partnership
12. Mul@ple
benefits
Partnership
working
Flood risk
managed &
reduced
Better access
and green
space
urban areas
regenerated
Housing
and
business
growth
More
effective
use of
resources
With good
partnerships you
can have it all!
Biodiversity
enhanced
Improved
water
quality
14. The risks from inaction:
Ø Poorly planned
development reducing
water and environmental
quality and increasing
flood risk
Ø Water supply and waste
water disposal constraints
on development
Ø Missed opportunities for
cost-saving
Ø Poorer quality urban
environments
Urban water management
is important
The benefits of getting it right:
Ø Regenerated towns and cities
Ø Enhanced biodiversity
Ø Improved water availability and
quality
Ø More green space
Ø Improved public realm and
people’s access to it
Ø Enabling new housing
Ø Facilitating business growth
17. Making it happen
Ø Partnerships are crucial
Ø Community engagement is essential
Ø Local Plans are key
Ø Legislation has a role, but
Ø Changing mind-sets is more important
You can’t make them do it, but
you can make them want to do it
21. Mul5ple
Benefits
• Flood
Risk
Management
• Improved
Water
Quality
and
Quan5ty
• Climate
Resilience
• Biodiversity
• Green
(&
Blue)
Spaces
• Community
Health
and
Well-‐being
• Business
Growth
• Urban
re-‐genera5on
29. CaBA Partnerships provide an ideal vehicle to mobilise debate
between flood threatened communities and those
organisations (& individuals) able to enact mitigation action
Influence
of
the
wider
catchment
upon
towns
and
ci5es
33. A
partnership
approach;
Soar
Catchment
Partnership,
City
Council,
EA,
LEP
Flood
Risk
Management
in
the
Soar
underpinned
by
data
and
evidence
34.
35. Catchment
Partnerships
–
the
benefits
of
collabora5ve
working
Rob
Collins
The
Rivers
Trust
rob@theriverstrust.org
36. 1.
What
are
the
opportuni5es
you
see
to
delivering
sustainable
and
collabora5ve
urban
water
management
and
how
can
any
barriers
be
overcome?
2.
What
key
elements
of
urban
water
management
should
be
captured
in
local
plans
and
policies?
3.
How
can
those
plans/polices
be
influenced
39. LOCAL ACTION PROJECT
STRATEGIC DATA, EVIDENCE
+ INFORMATION
Present robust evidence in a clear way to
help build consensus,facilitate local
decision-making & secure funding
VALUINGTHE BENEFITS FROM
NATURAL CAPITAL
Develop a clear understanding of the social,
cultural, environmental and economic
benefits provided by natural capital in urban
landscapes and estimating potential
improvements
LOCAL CHOICES, PRIORITIES
+ AMBITIONS
Talk to the local community and civil
society groups to discover their future
vision and ambition for where they live
FUNDING + RESOURCES
FOR ACTION
Support the formation of effective
stakeholder-led partnerships by increasing
engagement, mobilising local delivery
organisations and tapping into funding
sources
Working with local communities to enhance the value of natural capital in our
towns, cities and other urban spaces to improve people’s lives, the environment &
economic prosperity…
LOCALACTIONPROJECT
44. LOCALACTIONPROJECT
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Area(km²)
Natural Environment
Domestic Garden
Natural Surface
Inland Water
Urban
Other
CURRENT ASSETS
Land-cover Composition
Green Wedges
These areas of land offer a space for recreation and nature
conservation, providing a “green lung into urban areas”. They
have been included in the planning policy for Leicester and
Leicestershire for many years.
River Sence
This is the longest tributary
of the River Soar at around
~28km in length.
This map shows the main areas of natural infrastructure
across Leicester and the surrounding wards. There is a
diverse collection of natural habitats and green/blue
spaces across the area; including the wetlands and
riverine habitats to the north of the city, around
Watermead, and species-rich grassland to the
south at Aylestone Meadows Local Nature Reserve.
45. LOCALACTIONPROJECT
CURRENT ASSETS…continued
These maps illustrate the high level of detail that is available for mapping green and
blue infrastructure, in Leicester. Data is mapped for two example wards; Rushey
Mead Ward and a detailed section of Abbey Park and the surrounding area in
AbbeyWard.
Due to the detailed mapping and high resolution datasets provided
by Leicester City Council, we are able to view features such as outdoor
sports areas, play areas and street trees.
Rushey Mead Ward
Abbey Park in Abbey Ward
NATURAL CAPITAL
47. LOCALACTIONPROJECT
BENEFITS ASSESSMENT
To target and implement interventions that enhance natural capital effectively have
developed a series of metrics that assess the current benefits being
experienced by people and the environment.
Each metric is a measure with the potential to be
enhanced through natural solutions.
Access to Green Space
Percentage of people that meet the criteria outlined in Natural
England’s ANGSt (Accessible Natural Greenspace Standard).
Air Quality (PM10)
Mean concentration of PM10 modelled
for 2016, derived from background
maps from the UK-AIR data archive.
Flood Risk (Rivers and Sea)
Number of buildings that have a
greater than 1 in 100 year chance of
flooding from rivers and/or sea.
WFD Ecological Status
The 2014 Water Framework Directive
ecological status for the surrounding
river waterbody catchment.
Average House Price
Mean price for a two-bedroom
house in December 2015.
Flood Damage Cost (Rivers and Sea)
Estimated costs incurred due to flood damage
from rivers and sea, based on figures used in the
EA National Flood Risk Assessment (NaFRA).
Aesthetic value of landscape
Number of nature-related photos taken in
the area that have been uploaded to Flickr
and tagged accordingly.
Cultural Activity
Number of recreational facilities per 1000 people,
including places such as allotments, sports clubs.
Flood Risk (Surface Water)
Number of buildings that have a
greater than 1 in 100 year chance of
flooding from surface water.
Climate Regulation
Percentage of land area that is carbon
/GHG-sequestering habitats of
woodland, grassland, wetland or scrub.
Priority Habitat
Percentage of ward area that is
described as a priority habitat in
Natural England’s Priority Habitats
Inventory.
BENEFITS
• Ward-scale analysis
• Metrics represent range of
values in Leicester
• White spaces represent
opportunity for improvement
Low Flows
The water availability value of river
waterbody catchments, according to
the EA’s Catchment Abstraction
Management Strategy (CAMS).
48. LOCALACTIONPROJECT
BENEFITS SUMMARY
13. Beaumont Leys
Pop – 16,480
37. Abbey
Pop – 14,926
6. Western Park
Pop – 10,609
8. Fosse
Pop – 13,072
16. New Parks
Pop – 17,128
21. Westcotes
Pop – 11,644
17. Freemen
Pop – 10,949
44. Castle
Pop – 22,901
12. Charnwood
Pop – 13,291
22. Coleman
Pop – 14,669
23. Belgrave
Pop – 11,558
35. Spinney Hills
Pop – 25,571
43. Stoneygate
Pop – 20,390
45. Latimer
Pop – 12,457
50. LOCALACTIONPROJECT
OPPORTUNITY AREAS
The final step of this assessment is to identify key areas for improvement and
investigate areas of priority, opportunity and feasibility for implementing
measures at these sites.
1. Key areas of opportunity across Leicester, such as potential development
sites (including regeneration and brownfield sites) and proposed
wildlife sites.
Potential Sites for Nature
Potential for expanding local sites for nature in
Leicester. There are a number of proposed Local
Nature Reserves and Local Wildlife Sites, which if
designed effectively could produce a number of
benefits for the wider area.
Ashton Green
Abbey Meadows
Waterside Regeneration
51. LOCALACTIONPROJECT
TARGET AREA IDENTIFICATION
Landscape Priority Area 1
LowerWillowbrookWards
45. Latimer
- Very poor air quality
- High flood risk from rivers and sea
- Very high surface water flood risk (and damage costs)
- Low carbon storage
- Low property values
12. Charnwood
- Very poor air quality
- Very high flood risk from rivers and sea
- Very high surface water flood risk (and damage costs)
- Low provision of cultural activity resources
- Very low habitat provision and low carbon storage
- Very low property values
35. Spinney Hills
- Very poor air quality
- High flood risk from rivers and sea
- Very high surface water flood risk (and damage costs)
- Low provision of cultural activity resources
- Low carbon storage
- Low property values
22. Coleman
- Low access to green space and very poor air quality
- Very high flood risk from rivers and sea and surface water, as well as
very high predicted costs of damages
- Low provision of cultural activity resources
- Low carbon storage
- Very low property values
2. Using the information gathered from the previous sections, we are able to identify wards
that could benefit the most from increased or improved environmental infrastructure
and also what types of interventions are appropriate to meet those needs.
52. LOCALACTIONPROJECT
TARGET AREA IDENTIFICATION
Landscape Priority Area 1
LowerWillowbrookWards
3. Perform high resolution hydrological and suitability analyses to identify candidate sites
for specific interventions – these sites can then be ‘worked-up’ with resource/funding
sought, community consultation,optioneering, design and delivery.
54. LOCALACTIONPROJECT
URBAN TOOLBOX
Splits into FOUR broad approaches -
• Restoration / regeneration of urban environments
• GI or SuDS in new development
• Retrofit or greening actions
• Increased functionality – e.g. increased amenity or
access
• For each intervention we have developed
factsheets including cost and benefits info
AND include opportunity/feasibility criteria to
facilitate mapping/scenario development
55. LOCALACTIONPROJECT
Rain Gardens are usually small vegetated depressions in
the ground created mainly in residential areas to take
surface water run-off from roofs and hard surfaces.
RAIN GARDEN
Infiltration, bio-retention, soakaways
+ They but can vary significantly in size and are sometimes also called
‘bio-retention cells’
+ Aid infiltration by slowing water down and increasing soil permeability
+ Reducing runoff through root uptake of water and transpiration
+ Can act to remove pollutants from water – especially if wetland areas
are incorporated into the design
+ Aesthetically pleasing and can improve QoL and landscape value
IMPLEMENTATION
Rain gardens mimic the natural water retention of undeveloped land and reduce
the volume of water entering drains so they need to be hydrologically connected
Costs: £20-270+/m2 dependent on size and context.
Due to high variability of design and situation.£ £ £
Maintenance: low dependent on context but mainly
litter/sediment removal. Plants need to endure
waterlogged as well as dry conditions.
£ £ £
Stress levels
Wellbeing
Exposure to nature
Outdoor Learning
x
Allergy risk
Aesthetic quality can
degrade if not managedFeasibility: Can be used for retrofit in residential, industrial or
urban areas. Hydrological connectivity must exist or be created
56. LOCALACTIONPROJECT
RAIN GARDEN
Infiltration, bio-retention, soakaways
Stakeholder
dialogue
Partnership
working
Benefits/value
assessment
CASESTUDIES
Strategic
targeting
Practical delivery
of measures
The Rain Garden Guide
This guide is intended to help the homeowner or property manager
to create a simple rain garden within their own property.
www.raingardens.info/the-rain-garden-guide
Rain garden: design, construction and maintenance
recommendations based on a review of existing
systems
N. Somes, M. Potter, Joe Crosby and M Pfitzner.
In order to better understand factors that contribute to the
successful implementation of street scale Water Sensitive Urban
Design (WSUD) assessments were undertaken at 22 sites across
Melbourne.
www.eng.warwick.ac.uk/ircsa/pdf/13th/Somes.pdf
Evaluating rain gardens as a method to reduce the
impact of sewer overflows in sources of drinking water
Autixier L, Mailhot A, Bolduc S, Madoux-Humery AS, Galarneau M,
Prévost M, Dorner S.
Science of the Total Environment (2014) 499:238-47
Rain gardens were evaluated for their reduction of volumes of water
entering the drainage network and of CSOs.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25192930
SuDS for Schools -
The SuDS for Schools project is working with ten schools in the
Pymmes Brook catchment in North London to design and build
Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) in the school grounds.
www.sudsforschools.wwt.org.uk/
Ashby Grove residential retrofit rain garden, London
The Ashby Grove rain garden retrofit is designed to remove roof
water from a social housing block in Islington. The aim is to
disconnect one of the roof downpipes and allow water to flow
directly into a newly designed rain garden.
tinyurl.com/zpowlef
Islington Raingarden
The Ashby Grove raingarden in Islington was designed and
constructed as a practical example of what can be done in small
landscape spaces as suggested in the Islington SuDS Design Guide.
robertbrayassociates.co.uk/projects/islington-raingarden
Strutts Centre Rain Garden, Belper
Trent Rivers Trust have just completed this National Demonstration
Sustainable Drainage scheme (SuDS) designed by national expert Bob
Bray, on a grade II listed building.
www.trentriverstrust.org/site/Rain-Gardens
57. LOCALACTIONPROJECT
Trees can perform a number of functions that in turn
provide a number of different benefits to people in urban
landscapes -
TREES
Street trees, tree pits, urban forest
+ Improving air quality by trapping pollutants
+ Intercepting rainfall to slow the rate of water reaching the ground
+ Increasing infiltration by creating permeable surfaces
+ Reducing runoff through root uptake of water and transpiration
+ Trees are also aesthetically pleasing natural features in an urban
landscape and thus provide many less tangible benefits that improve
people’s quality of life, health and wellbeing
IMPLEMENTATION
Trees are very versatile and can be used in a variety of situations. The benefits
produced depend on their size, species, location and style of delivery.
Costs per singular tree: £100-400
(including planting and initial maintenance)£ £ £
Maintenance: mainly pruning
(as part of landscape management)£ £ £
stress levels
exercise frequency
New-born health
exercise frequency
New-born health
Property damage:
roots, litter, shading
x
allergy risk
Can block views
Feasibility: can be planted in pavements large enough to receive
them. Cab planted on existing GI or in new developments
58. LOCALACTIONPROJECT
TREES
Street trees, tree pits, urban forest
Stakeholder
dialogue
Partnership
working
Benefits/value
assessment
CASESTUDIES
Strategic
targeting
Practical delivery
of measures
Urban Forest Effects Model (UFORE) & i-Tree Eco
The Urban Forest Effects Model (UFORE) is a science-based, peer-
reviewed computer model designed to assess and quantify urban
forest ecosystem services, based on field data inputs and external
datasets (e.g. weather and pollution). It was adapted for inclusion
with the i-Tree software suite from the USDA Forest Service, and
was subsequently renamed as i-Tree Eco.
www.itreetools.org
Longitudinal effects on mental health of moving to
greener and less green urban areas.
Alcock I, White MP, Wheeler BW, Fleming LE, Depledge MH.
Environmental Science & Technology (2014) 21; 48 (2):1247-55.
Moving to greener urban areas was associated with sustained mental
health improvements, suggesting that environmental policies to
increase urban green space may have sustainable public health
benefits.
Torbay's Urban Forest
The study (the first of its kind in the UK) used the i-Tree Eco model
(developed by the US Forest Service, and based on peer reviewed
research) to quantify the structure, and some of the major
environmental benefits delivered by Torbay’s trees.
www.torbay.gov.uk/tuf.pdfitreetools.org
StreetTree London
Street Tree is a non-profit making company founded on the belief
that trees should form an integral part of the urban landscape. Our
aim is to increase London's tree stock, working with Local
Authorities, Fund-holders, and business partners, to promote street
trees and the many benefits they bring.
www.streettree.org
Red Rose Forest – Green Streets Case Studies
Red Rose Forest's Green Streets team is dedicated to making our
towns and cities greener and more attractive places to live, work and
invest. They plant street trees, deliver bespoke street greening
projects, create places to grow food, greenspace improvement, plant
community woodlands and orchards, build green roofs and improve
school grounds.
tinyurl.com/j3vhpxm
Wirral StreetTrees Programme
A tree planting programme that is helping to transform Wirral into a
thriving economic hub. By April this year over 600 trees across 8km
will have been planted in streets and green spaces, as part of a three-
year programme to link residential areas to places of employment
and training.
tinyurl.com/jn5ggpd
68. SuDS
for
Schools
10
schools
–
one
catchment
2000+
students
engaged
Knowledge,
skills
and
confidence
Cleaner
stream,
new
habitats
Healthy,
connected
people
InspiraIonal
places
Transformed
learning
–
not
just
the
students
69.
70.
71.
72. “Love
the
garden.
The
children
sit
at
the
benches
by
the
garden
every
break
and
lunch8me”
Susi
Earnshaw
74. What
a
wonderful
day
we
had!
It
exceeded
all
our
expecta8ons.
Thank
you
so
much
for
everything.
Please
pass
on
our
thanks
to
all
your
colleagues
who
made
it
such
a
successful
event.
Mr
Westmore,
AcIng
Head
Teacher
SuDS
are
now
well
and
truly
in
the
Hollickwood
consciousness,
and
also
of
all
our
community
guests,
(I
see
that
all
the
parents'
Facebook
pages
are
going
crazy
tonight
with
admiring
comments
about
our
SuDS!).
Linden
Groves,
Parent
&
Gardening
CommiQee
75. -‐Transforming
the
Salthill
catchment
in
Slough-‐
mulIple
benefits
–
broader
support
Health
and
well-‐being
strategies
Reduced
(fear
of)
crime
Engagement
-‐
community
cohesion
Skills,
knowledge
–
jobs
Cleaner
streams
(WFD)
Reduced
flood
risk
(SWMP)
CC
adaptaIon
Wetlands
and
wildlife
(GI)
76. Prince
of
Wales
community
wetland
Urban
regeneraIon
–
blue/green
infrastructure
2ha
of
new
urban
wetlands
SuDS
to
clean
road-‐run-‐off
Community
co-‐design
and
management
Skills,
training,
empowerment,
civic
pride
77. • Engage
early
• Build
broad
support
-‐
who
benefits?
• CollaboraIve
design
• Be
prepared
to
adapt
• Community
management
• Planners
and
permissions
hQp://www.wwt.org.uk/uploads/documents/1400927422_
Sustainabledrainagesystemsguide.pdf
hQps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InZKJ6JlCF4
82. ! Main objectives
! Improve water quality and habitat by working
efficiently together
! Community engagement and participation
! Raise awareness
! Mis-connections
! Pollution prevention
! Physical improvements
113. Engagement project
• Upper Mersey tributary
• Catchment Partnership project
• River improvement
• River survey indicates misconnections
• Engaging public to find misconnections
114. Evidence-based
Approach
• Locate the inputs to a local river
• Take water samples at hotspots
• Analyse to establish likely source
• Prioritise
• Deal with each
source accordingly.
115. • Primary ground survey of
the waterbody
• Target identified reaches
• Identify points for wet
weather sampling
River Survey
125. Next Steps
• Roll out the methodology to other urban areas
• Already incorporated into three other projects
In Mersey Basin
• Monitor issues
• Simple water tests
• Follow up investigations
Bring in volunteer help locally
• Promoting this technique
• Working with CaBA Urban working group
Nationally
127. To address Urban Diffuse Water Pollution
issues:
• Evidence-based project
• Engaging the public locally
• Targeting issues found in river surveys
• Local scale
• One brook at a time.
More urban surveys
130. Rewilding
Enfield’s
Urban
Rivers
A
partnership
project
between
Thames21
and
London
Borough
of
Enfield
Improving
water
quality
and
restoring
river
systems
back
to
a
natural
state,
giving
nature
back
the
power
to
cleanse
and
maintain
healthy
river
systems.
Contact:
Aimee
Felus,
Thames21
M:
07500
832284
E:
aimee.felus@thames21.org.uk
Ian
Russell,
London
Borough
of
Enfield
T:
0208
379
3499
E:
ian.russell@enfield.gov.uk
131. IdenRfying
Enfield’s
troubled
waters
Le4
(above
and
below):
MisconnecRons
caused
severe
polluRon
issues
in
the
Houndsden
GuVer
and
Glenbrook
Above
right:
River
walls
are
stained
from
oils
and
heavy
metals
washed
from
roads
into
the
Salmons
Brook
Below
right:
Oils
washing
into
the
surface
water
drains,
as
is
frequent
in
Enfield
132. Verifying
the
need
for
acRon
Above
le4:
Invertebrates
sampling
on
the
Salmons
Brook,
June
2014
Below
le4:
E-‐coli
colonies
growing
on
agar
aer
contact
with
sample
taken
from
the
Glenbrook
Right:
TesRng
water
samples
taken
from
the
Enfield’s
waterways
in
the
Thames21
Lab
133. Glenbrook
Wetlands
Top:
Extract
from
concept
plan
for
wetland
chain
Above
le4:
Before
construcRon
works
began
(site
of
basin
six),
June
2014
Above
middle:
Pre-‐planted
coir
maVs
being
secured
by
volunteers
in
basin
6
(drained
for
the
task),
March
2015
Above
right:
Basin
six
planted
with
mixed
wetland
species,
May
2015
134. Grovelands
Park
Wetlands
Above
le4:
Extract
from
concept
plan
for
wetlands
Top
middle:
Natural
woodland
basin
in
Grovelands
Park
aer
scrub
has
been
removed
from
site,
June
2014
Top
right:
Volunteers
plant
sedges
in
the
newly
constructed
wetland
basin,
July
2014
Below
le4:
Wetland
basin
filtering
polluted
run-‐off
which
enters
from
the
surrounding
urban
area,
September
2015
Below
right:
Ouelow
path
from
wetlands
basin
which
takes
filtered
water
under
the
footbridge
and
into
the
newly
deculverted
stream-‐
here
shown
dry
in
low
flow
condiRons,
September
2015
135. DeculverRng
Streams
Above
le4:
Breaking
out
the
culvert
in
Grovelands
Park,
May
2014
Above
right:
The
stream
was
allowed
to
find
its
own
path
through
the
woodland,
meandering
and
fanning
out,
creaRng
a
beauRful
and
popular
feature.
Here
receiving
some
TLC,
September
2015
136. Partnerships:
LBE
&
T21
Site
design,
engineering
Community
engagement,
monitoring
Together
–
works
implementaRon,
sustainability
of
project
(future
funding
and
maintenance)
Steering
group
Planning
and
design,
overcome
issues
Gaining
experRse
Undertake
major
design
Depts:
Parks,
Highways,
Councillors,
Environmental
Health
In
return:
AVracRng
funding
and
investment,
collaboraRons
with
universiRes,
high
quality
analysis,
bringing
community
on-‐board,
maintenance
training
137. Other
key
partners
• Friends
of
Parks
groups
and
local
residents
–
insRgators,
consultaRon,
volunteering,
polluRon
reporRng,
training
for
maintenance
• EA
–
advisory
• Thames
Water
–
polluRon
invesRgaRon,
funding
CiAzens
–
Charity
–
Public
-‐
Private
138. A
catalyst
for
more
intervenRons
-‐
collecRvely
treaRng
473ha
of
urban
catchment
139. Pymmes
Park
Wetlands
Above
le4:
Wetland
cell
aer
construcRon
Above
right:
Volunteers
helping
to
plant
the
wetlands
Below:
Wetland
basins
aer
planRng
140. Firs
Farm
Wetlands
Firs Farm Wetlands 30,000m3 flood storage, 2.4ha habitat
enhancements including 4,000m2 wetlands, 600m long
cycleway
141. Grovelands
Park
Lake
Reed
Bed
Above
le4:
Grovelands
Park
Lake
before
reed
bed
construcRon,
December
2014
Above
right:
Grovelands
Park
Reed
Bed
establishing
well
aer
construcRon,
September
2015
Below
le4:
Sediment
shied
and
faggots
placed
to
create
new
environment
for
reeds
to
propagate,
June
2015
Below
right:
Polluted
water
entering
the
lake
as
a
result
of
misconnecRons
and
road
run-‐off
is
now
treated
by
the
reed
bed,
September
2015
142. Houndsden
Road
Rain
Gardens
Top:
Extract
from
rain
garden
plan
Above
le4:
Low
impact
digger
creaRng
swale
along
the
verge,
March
2015
Above
middle:
Volunteers
planRng
sedges
in
the
newly
created
swale,
March
2015
Below
right:
AddiRonal
rain
garden
treatment
basins
shown
shortly
aer
planRng,
September
2015
143. ConnecRng
people
to
their
rivers
Above
le4:
A
Grandad
and
Grandson
planRng
sedges
together
in
the
Glenbrook
wetlands,
February
2014
Above
right:
Training
a
new
group
of
ciRzen
scienRst
water
quality
testers,
July
2015
Below
le4:
Locals
enjoying
a
clean
up
of
the
newly
deculverted
stream
in
Grovelands
Park,
September
2015
Below
right:
Families
learning
about
their
urban
rivers
and
the
posiRve
impact
of
wetlands,
September
2015
144. Project
in
Progress
-‐
Drain
Marking
Le4:
Drain
marker
and
temporary
lamppost
signage
placed
around
Enfield
to
raise
awareness
that
surface
that
surface
water
drains
here
lead
directly
to
local
rivers
Right:
Volunteers
help
mark
surface
water
drains
with
drain
markers
145. Project
in
Progress
-‐
Bury
Lodge
Wetlands
Above:
Bury
Lodge
Wetlands,
currently
under
construcRon
Below:
Concept
of
Bury
Lodge
Wetlands
aer
planRng
is
finished
and
new
access
has
been
implemented
146. Project
in
Progress
-‐
Alma
Road
Rain
Gardens
Above:
VisualisaRons
of
the
new
Alma
Road
Rain
Gardens,
to
be
constructed
in
March
this
year
Developers
taking
note
–
7ha
Alma
Estate
CiRzens
–
Charity
–
Public
sector
–
Private
sector
147. Benefits
• Water quality – Average reductions of 67% ammonia, 68% nitrate, 55% total nitrogen. Glenbrook wetlands
reduced average phosphate concentrations by 23% and Chemical Oxygen Demand by 61%. Coliform bacteria
reduced.
• Flood risk – flood risk reduced for >100 properties in Moore Brook catchment
• Amenity – diverse landscape with improved access for all users, seating areas and opportunities for natural play,
greening the grey
• Biodiversity – over 3 hectares of habitat improvements, mosaic of different habitat types including woodland,
wetlands, ponds and meadow
• Education – several nearby schools using Pymmes Park and Firs Farm Wetlands as an educational resource,
facilitated by Thames21’s Fixing Broken Rivers project. Wonderful Wetlands schools festival in June
• Transport/Exercise – over 1km of new footpaths for walking/jogging/cycling
• Safety – transforming neglected sites attracting anti-social behaviour to new green oases for the community