Adapting Web Mapping Curriculum to Open Source Technologies
•Descargar como PPT, PDF•
1 recomendación•1,555 vistas
Presentation given on May 22, 2013 at the FOSS4G North America conference in Minneapolis.
![Adapting Web Mapping Curriculum
to Open Source Technologies
{
Carl M. Sack:
cmsack@wisc.edu,
Robert E. Roth:
reroth@wisc.edu,
Richard G. Donohue:
rgdonohue@wisc.edu,
Timothy R. Wallace:
twallace2@wisc.edu,
Tanya M.A. Buckingham:
tbuckingham@wisc.edu
};
[Interactive map by Chloe Quinn]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/webmappingtechnologiesfoss4g2013-130522130828-phpapp02/85/Adapting-Web-Mapping-Curriculum-to-Open-Source-Technologies-1-320.jpg)
Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
Destacado
Destacado (20)
Similar a Adapting Web Mapping Curriculum to Open Source Technologies
Similar a Adapting Web Mapping Curriculum to Open Source Technologies (20)
Más de Carl Sack
Más de Carl Sack (9)
Último
Último (20)
Adapting Web Mapping Curriculum to Open Source Technologies
- 1. Adapting Web Mapping Curriculum to Open Source Technologies { Carl M. Sack: cmsack@wisc.edu, Robert E. Roth: reroth@wisc.edu, Richard G. Donohue: rgdonohue@wisc.edu, Timothy R. Wallace: twallace2@wisc.edu, Tanya M.A. Buckingham: tbuckingham@wisc.edu }; [Interactive map by Chloe Quinn]
- 2. introductionintroduction we and research design develop teach web maps UW-MADISON CARTOGRAPHY PROGRAM
- 3. introduction
- 5. guiding questions “which technologies or tools should we use for web mapping?” “how do we use these tools to make web maps that are well-designed?” “how do we teach these tools?” “how can we adapt to the rapid pace of change?” var q1 = var q2 = var q3 = var q4 =
- 6. process function 1 { competitive analysis of existing technologies }; function 3 { diary study with representative web mapping scenario }; function 2 { needs assessment survey of UW staff };
- 9. [ Coding Completed Spring 2012]
- 10. [ Coding Completed Spring 2012]
- 11. [ Coding Completed Spring 2012]
- 12. needs assessment survey UW System Geospatial Alliance
- 14. needs assessment survey please rate the importance of the following characteristics of web maps:
- 15. please rate the importance of the following practical considerations of web maps: needs assessment survey
- 16. please rate the importance of the following technical considerations of web maps: needs assessment survey
- 17. diary study MAPPING TASKS 40 work hours + training & journaling
- 18. diary study
- 19. D3 Google Maps API LeafletOpenLayers
- 20. diary study Work Logs = one entry per hour with code, screenshot, emotions OpenLayers Control Participant
- 21. diary study Work Logs = one entry per hour with code, screenshot, emotions Leaflet v0.4 release Leaflet Variable Participant C
- 22. diary study
- 23. d3 Google Maps API Leaflet OpenLayers
- 25. conclusion technologies== [[aesthetic, interactive], [flexible, scalable], [stable, learnable]] design== [extensible, impactable, low-cost] teaching== [collaborative, employable] adaptation== [rapid, ongoing] WHY OPEN SOURCE?
- 26. conclusion Thank you! Carl Sack cmsack@wisc.edu www.northlandia.com Roth RE, RG Donohue, CM Sack, TR Wallace, and TMA Buckingham. 2013. “A process for assessing emergent web mapping technologies.” In: Proceedings of the 26th International Cartographic Conference. Dresden, Germany: August 25-30. www.northlandia.com/pdf/RothEtAl2013.pdf
Notas del editor
- 1. Development—what’s out there? 2) Design—what are people using and what for? 3) Dissemination—how is it learned by novice developers? 4) Adaptation—was the process successful and can we use this process to update our skills base in the future?
- Purpose not to pick a “winner”, but select a technology stack that works given the G575 context.
- 1) Justifies dual interest in representation and interaction in matrix. 2) Flash is animation-focused; wrong tool for the job to begin with?
- Intro classes: industry standards software; advanced: open-source. Curriculum reflects bimodal distribution of access/cost.
- Platform dependency: does it work on IE? Also showing lack of emphasis on mobile, location-aware. How would this change today?
- Technology itself results in different aesthetics (same participant). Everyone emphasized time in solution, one of the requirements.
- Differences in process
- Things we learned about what we’re looking for and how to implement it during the study led to the understanding that open source technology is critical to use and teach at this juncture. But this also means that a robust process for continuous adaptation to change is required.