2. Theory
1. Take a 3D model
2. Slice model into
a number of layers
3. Print first 2D slice
4. Increment height
5. Print next layer
6. Repeat until finished
1 2
3
5
4
3. 3D Printing Core Technologies
SLA - Steriolithography Apparatus
Liquid resin cured solid via UV light/laser
SLS/SLM - Selective Laser Sintering / Selective Laser Melting
Powders sintered/fused together via laser
FDM/FFF – Fused Deposition Modeling / Fused Filament Fabrication
Partially melted plastics extruded through a nozzle and cooled
LOM - Laminated Object Manufacturing
Layers of solid material fused together with binder or pressure/heat
Zprinting
Powders combined together with binder via actual printer print heads
Polyjet
Liquid resin jetted out of actual printer print heads and cured with UV light
Many others
4. History
1980
First patents issued for aspects of 3D printing,
Fujitsu Ltd, NEC Corp
1986
Chuck Hull invents Stereolithography (SLA), the
STL file format, and founds 3D Systems
Late 1986
Carl Deckard and the University of Texas patent
Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)
5. History
1989
Stratasys is founded using Fused
Deposition Modeling (FDM) technology
Late 1989
MIT develops new technique called
Zprinting and starts Zcorp
1999
Objet based in Isreal invents PolyJet technology
which leads to multi-material 3D printing
6. History
2005
Some FDM patents about to expire and personal
printers emerge starting with the Open Source
RepRap
2008
Various companies take the
design and create new printers
and sell kits costing between
$500-$2000
2009
MakerBot is founded and
becomes popular with their
“Cupcake CNC”
7. History
2007
Ponoko became one of the first sites where one
could upload a design and have it made
2008
Shapeways is founded upon same principles
Late 2008
Thingiverse becomes the universe of
free things to download which can be
3D printed
8. History
Now
Bigger, faster and cheaper
DIY kits very cheap and popular
Many large acquisitions
Lawsuits against others
Key patents expiring allowing
new players to enter the game
9. Paper Layers
Mcor Technologies
Based in Ireland
Uses plain paper (white or colored)
Now prints in full color (like inkjet printers)
Has partnered with Staples in
Netherlands to provide in
store pickup of 3D prints
10. Plastic Layers
Solido 3D
Based in USA
Uses a roll of plastic and glue sticks
Targeted household buyers but didn’t find
enough buyers
Currently in receivership
11. Sweet Printer
CandyFab
Based in USA
Primarily hobbyist driven
Low resolution
Extremely cheap parts
Hot air melting jet
12. Solar Power
Solar Sinter
Developed by Markus Kayser
while a student at
the Royal College of Art
Uses nothing but the Sun and Sand
13. Selective laser sintering - SLS
3D Systems
Based in USA
Sinters various plastics, primarily Nylon
Really fast build speeds
Parts can be flexible
Can be dyed any colour
14. Selective laser melting - SLM
Realizer GmbH
Based in Germany
Sinters many metals
Aluminum
Titanium
Stainless Steel
Gold
Inconel
Incredibly fine resolution
Fairly slow and costly process
15. Starch Based Powder
ZCorporation
Based in USA
Started with starch based powders and now can
do more types
Able to do full color
Cheap materials result in low cost parts
Now owned by 3D Systems
16. Casting Sand Based Powder
The Ex One Company
Based in Germany
Activated casting sand
Metal parts can then be cast
Can nest multiple parts at a time
18. PolyJet Technology
Objet Ltd.
Based in Israel
Able to print multi-materials including digital
materials
Both soft and hard in the same part
Now owned by Stratasys
19. FDM Machines
Stratasys Inc.
Based in USA
Initially only ABS plastic but now
many high end plastics
Most stable and strong of any
non- metal 3D printing material
20. Cement Extruders
Large scale printers
Primarily for building structures / components
Integrated plumbing and electrical
23. DIY Revolution
Nearing a hundred different kits available,
a new one every week
Several online groups for enthusiasts
Open source hardware and software
33. Home Based Manufacturing
Download, print, use, share
No more going to the store to
buy items
Manufacture right in your
own home
Order a replacement
part and print at home
Lots of development into
multi-material printers
35. 3D Printed Guns
Don’t believe everything you read
Single shot only
More likely to blow your hand off
Much safer ways to create guns than 3D printing
Notas del editor
99.9% of all 3D printers work on the same principle.
Take an existing 3D model and export to a compatible file type (de facto standard is .STL)
Slice that file type into a number of layers using additional software
Print first 2D slice
Increment height a certain amount
Print next layer
Repeat until last layer is finished
All the different types of 3D printers use these steps. Some methods print the final material directly, others combine two technologies to create a solid material.
Depending on the method, some require additional supports added to the original 3D model in order to print correctly. Others require a layer material to be deposited before a layer can be printed. Overall though, the steps are all the same.
Just a few of the main technologies companies are developing, each having various pros/cons.
Chuck Hull invented Stereolithography known as SLA (Resin/Laser based printing) as well as and the STL file format and started 3D Systems in 1986. SLS - US Patent 4863538
In 1989, Stratasys was founded and created the Fused Deposition Modeling method known as FDM (Extruder based printing) and by 2007 supplied 44% of the world market in additive fabrication machines. Zprinting - Patent # 5204055
The 1990's saw primarily only corporations and Universities using 3D printers because the cheapest ones available cost at least $20,000. The main companies supplying 3D printers were 3D Systems, Stratasys, and Z-Corp.
By the mid 2000's, more powerful personal computers, and easier to use 3D modelling allowed 3D printing to enter the home/hobbyist market. These hobbyist machines took cues from the large machines these corporations created and made them smaller, cheaper, and more readily available. The first one of these home based systems was RepRap in 2005. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Reprap_Darwin.jpg What made RepRap so popular, is the approach of open source. The design, software, and hardware were all made open to anyone who wanted to use, modify, or copy. This spawned a number of various projects such as the MakerBot Industries Thing-O-Matic, Ultimaker, Shapercube, Mosaic, Prusa and Huxley 3D printers as well as many many more (new ones appear all the time and it's now hard to keep track). All of which are based on the FDM method and quality varies greatly. Kits have cost anywhere from $500-$2000, and have seen improvements in speed, accuracy, and capabilities. New machines are now able to print in two colors or use water soluble support material. One new FDM project, the MakiBox, has created a kit which can be assembled in a few hours and costs only $300 (mine is on it's way).
Recently, other players have come up to offer custom 3D printer services online. This is where you upload your 3D model, tell them what method you want to use, and they provide a quote, and quick turn around on your part. Two of the biggest companies that offer these services are Ponoko and Shapeways. Not only can you have your designs made, but you can sell those designs for others to buy, where you get a commission on the parts you designed that others want to have printed.
In terms of big players in the field, it really has stayed with those who started it. 3D Systems (with Chuck Hull as Executive VP and CTO) has purchased just about every type of 3D printing technology available from small hobbyist companies (like BotMill), to some of the other competing founding technologies like Z-Corp. 3D Systems has FDM, SLA, SLS, SLM (Direct Metal), and ZPrinting. Stratasys has remained dominant in the FDM field purchasing other FDM companies (uPrint, FORTUS, RedEye On Demand, Dimension Printing) while also producing very large envelop printers with the largest one being 36" x 24" x 36".
3D Systems owns Zcorp
Stratasys owns Objet and MakerBot and Thingiverse
Also known as Laminated Object Manufacturing (LOM).
The individual layers of the part start from solid sheets of material which have the final shape cut out of them, with each layer bonded to the next one with some type of adhesive.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=ZJk8O6y6fpM#t=14(1min)
Matrix video start at 14s
Model 1 video start right away and skip through
http://www.mcortechnologies.com/resources/gallery/gallery-videos/
Advantages
Cheap stock material
$0.21/Cu. In.
One of the lowest price per cubic inch for large parts
Parts are easily recyclable
Disadvantages
Build size dependant on paper size
Difficult to remove support material
Cutters wear out and can cause bad prints
Start video at 57s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=kf-zLPuW844#t=57
Advantages
Cheap machine cost
Flexible and transparent parts
Materials get used up at same rate
Relatively cheap material
$1.34/Cu.In
Disadvantages
Build size is dependent on PVC roll
A lot of waste material for small parts
Non-recyclable
Difficult to remove support material
Cutters wear out and can cause bad prints
In Powder based printing, the final part is created from some sort of powder. This powder can be anything including;
sugar
sand
starch
gypsum cement (U.S. Gypsum HYDROPERM)
plastic
glass
ceramic
powdered aluminum
powdered titanium
The type of powder determines the type of print head needed to make it become solid. This is done either chemically or thermally. For thermal fusion, the melting point of the powder determines the level of power needed for the printer. In order to print the first slice, a even layer of powder needs to be deposited onto the print bed. Then the powder becomes fused in the desired pattern using the appropriate method. The print bed lowers a certain amount, a new layer of powder is put down, and the process is repeated.
Sintering methods consist of using heat to melt a material to form a solid. This heat source could come from a jet of hot air, concentrated solar, lasers, or electron beams.
In the pursuit of creating large cheap objects, CandyFab was created. Using cheap granulated sugar and a jet of hot air, CandyFab has gone through several iterations to create large edible prints, each one becoming larger and more automated. The largest build envelope was 24" x 13.5" x 9". The resolution is limited not by the gain size of the sugar, but more by the air-flow rate of their hot air jet. They have not pursued using a high powered laser since it would be quite expensive and contrary to the overall desire to make this a low cost machine. http://www.flickr.com/photos/oskay/sets/72157594553416374/
In trying to find even cheaper materials and power sources, this project http://www.markuskayser.com/ ( (Skip to 2:26 then to 4:30) uses a large fresnel lens to concentrate solar energy onto a bed of sand to create prints. Resolution is quite low, but so are the operating costs! Exact specs are not available.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVkUwqzjGJY
Using a CO2 laser and various plastics, the sPro 230 HS from 3D Systems is the largest available at 22" x 22" x 30" with Z-resolution between 0.003"-0.006" and build speed of 300 cu. in. / hr.
Advantages
Extremely fast build speed
Material properties of finished part close to injection molded parts
Powders can be extremely cheap ($1.50/cu.in)
Disadvantages
Expensive machine cost up to $485,000
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YgEOsZ8iJg#t=22
Advantages
Parts made from metal
Extremely fine resolution
Disadvantages
Very expensive machine cost ($600-700k)
Expensive material cost
Expensive consumables such as Argon at 70 L/hr
Huge power consumption around 2.5kW
Systems using a liquid ink-jet type of print head prints a binder onto a powdered layer. This layer will react with the binder due to a chemical reaction with the powder. Binders can range from a simple water/alcohol mixture, to specific resins which react with an activated powder mixture.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7h09dTVkdw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QP73uTJApw#t=171
Advantages
Full color prints
Overall consumable cost can be low
Disadvantages
Low material strength without wicking (can use CA – super glue to add strength)
Can be messy
$60,000 for best machine out there
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgrGhJ5u5oM
Advantages
Can cast directly into printed part
Very large parts
Disadvantages
High machine cost $1.5-1.9 million
Needs a large area for operation
Key is the special UV cured resin. Printers differ only in the way the resin is cured.
One advantage that powder and cutter based technologies have over resin and FDM is that there is no need for support material. Resin and FDM require supports to be printed along side the final part. This is needed, otherwise you could print overhangs in air or liquid and they would fall down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iceiNb_1E0I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keybWPgrjbc
Advantages
Very large parts
High level of accuracy
Parts could weigh up to 330 lbs!
Disadvantages
High material cost
Can be a very slow process
Material cost is high at $5/cu.in
Resin can be toxic and need special handling
Parts need to be post cured to achieve final stability
Parts could change shape over time or change color depending on resin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=pbjcfplk8Ig#t=77s
Advantages
Can print very fine resolution
Can print in different materials at the same time
Can print in color
Can create hybrid (digital) materials
Disadvantages
High material cost
High machine cost
Fairly high amount of waste due to purging the heads before each layer
Recycled plastic from refrigerator
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvRTHynk9KA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlDDKb3_Dog
Advantages
-Materials are stable
-A number of colors
-Materials are common
-Lots of new plastics available including engineering plastics
-Most common type of printer in DIY world
Disadvantages
-Finer details increase the print time
-Requires hot bay temperature which uses lots of power in order to prevent part curling for ABS
Print through either a syringe or a pump (progressive cavity pump) or through sintering
The meat is turkey which was done in honor of US Thanksgiving
http://fabbaloo.com/blog/2014/1/7/developments-in-3d-food-printing.html
http://www.tctmagazine.com/ces-news/worlds-first-kitchen-ready-chefjet-3d-printer-launched-by-3/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euZivv8ySyA
General move towards cheaper machines, cheaper materials
Material costs $2/kg vs. $8.80/kg from Stratasys
Free software and hardware designs are available
Majority are FDM based, but some are SLA or powder
Close to 100 kits are available, most are in the $1000 range, but some cost as low as $100 (Peachy Printer - SLA) to $300 (http://makibox.com/ - FFF) which is the one I’m waiting on.
http://pinterest.com/finklean/diy-3d-printers/
http://fabbaloo.com/blog/2014/1/3/solid-concepts-printed-metal-gun-on-sale.html
1911DMLS will run you $11,900
http://fabbaloo.com/blog/2013/5/10/a-word-on-3d-printed-gun-safety.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL7y3YNUbiY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxe_zMJj5m0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7cn1YIm3nU
http://www.gadgetreview.com/2013/05/another-3d-gun-has-been-printed.html
http://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/forget-3d-printed-guns-dude-makes-working-firearms-stuff-can-buy-airport-terminals/