The Active Management Value Ratio: The New Science of Benchmarking Investment...
Darwin
1. Australian Libraries Copyright Committee Training
Darwin 2015
@TrishHepworth
Except where otherwise noted, this presentation is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Licence, Australian Libraries Copyright Committee
2. Copyright – a property right that protects expression
Separate from moral rights
6. Requirements for copyright protection:
Can only be form of expression of information
Expression must be in material form
The work must have an author
The work must be original
originality of expression
not underlying idea
/
7. Works Subject Matter
other than works
• Literary
• Dramatic
• Artistic
• Musical
Films
Films, animations
computer games
Sound recordings
Any recording of sound
Radio & TV broadcasts
Published editions
Layout, typesetting
8. • Score
• Music
• Lyrics
• Background music
• Sound recordings
• Script
• Underlying work
• Screenplay
• Costume design
• Artworks
• Film recording
9. Who is the owner of copyright?
•Generally the “author”
•In sound recordings, the “maker”– can be
performers and record producers
•Films – generally “producer” of the film;
•If made in course of employment the
Employer
10.
11. Copyright gives exclusive rights to:
• Reproduce: copying of a work in any format, including
electronic
• Publication: right to make the work public for the first
time
• Public performance and communication: including
electronic communications
• Adaptation: i.e. translations, TV series
12. Generally, copyright is infringed if the
work, or a “substantial part” of the work,
is used without permission in one of the
ways exclusively reserved by the copyright
owner…
Copyright can also be infringed where
there is:
•Authorisation
•Importation
•Commercial dealings with pirate material
•Allowing the use of a venue for infringing
•performance/screening
13. Authorisation
Section 39A, s49 notices
section 49 – supplying digital copies to library/archive users
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Copyright Regulations 1969
WARNING
This material has been provided to you
pursuant to section 49 of the Copyright Act
1968 (the Act) for the purposes of
research or study. The contents of the
material may be subject to copyright
protection under the Act.
Further dealings by you with this material
may be an infringement of copyright…
14. Circumvention of Technological Protection Measures (TPMs)
Digital ‘locks’ preventing people from using works in certain ways
and/or accessing copyright works.
Exceptions allowing the circumvention of TPMs:
Where the copyright owner permits it
Region coding (DVDs, games)
Interoperability with computer programs
Making of preservation copies
Providing works to users and other libraries under section 49 and 50
15. Duration of copyright
70 years after death
Film and sound recordings –
Depends on which rights!
1955, 1955-1968, 1968+
Television and sound broadcast – 50 years
from end of year in which broadcast made
Photographs – generally, 70 years after the
end of the year of author’s death
Orphan works?
...unpublished works?
toa267
16.
17. Moral rights
Not a ‘copyright right’
Inalienable rights which cannot be assigned
Include:
•Attribution
•Prevention of false attribution
•Ensuring integrity of authorship – right to object to
mutilation, distortion, any act prejudicial to author’s
honour or reputation
22. Exceptions – private copying
Not available to organisations or institutions –
‘private and domestic use’
Time shifting - recording TV programs or radio
to watch or listen to at another time
Format shifting - i.e. scanning photographs to
put on a CD; converting CD to digital files***
Shifting music between devices (‘the iPod
exception’) – ‘space shifting’
23. Exceptions – Fair Dealing
•Criticism or review (s41) – must involve analysis or critique
of the work – cannot be merely illustrative.
•Parody or satire s41A) – must offer comment on the work
•Reporting of news (s42)
•Research or study (s40) – with limits on amount of the work
that can be reproduced
As well as professional legal privilege and judicial proceedings
24. Fair Dealing for research or study (s40)
Certain quantities are ‘deemed’ fair:
Hardcopy = 10% of pages or 1 chapter
Electronic = 10 % of words or 1 chapter
Periodicals = 1 article (more than 1 if it relates to the same
research or course of study)
If you wish to copy more, or are copying an artistic work -
need to consider a number of factors to decide if it’s fair.
25. Fair Dealing for research or study (s40)
Factors to consider include:
•the purpose and character of the work
•the nature of the work or adaptation
•the possibility of obtaining the work within a reasonable time at an
ordinary commercial price
•the effect of the dealing upon the potential market for, or value of, the
work or adaptation; and
•in a case where part only of the work or adaptation is reproduced; the
amount and substantiality of the part copied /taken in relation to the
whole work or adaptation.
NOTE : THIS DOES NOT APPLY TO AUDIO VISUAL MATERIAL
AND THERE’S NO GUIDANCE FOR COPYRIGHT IMAGES (ARTISTIC
WORKS) – NEED TO CONSIDER ALL THE FACTORS BEFORE COPYING
26. Part VA: Broadcasts (TV, radio,
cable, satellite). License managed
by Screenrights
Part VB: Works (hard copy &
electronic) License managed by
the Copyright Agency Limited
27. Educational licences
•Allows educational institutions to use
copyright material for educational
purposes only.
•Not exceptions but rather a system for
remuneration for use of copyrighted
material.
•If an exception applies, or if you have
permission from the copyright holder you
do not need to rely on these licenses.
28. Part VB – literary, dramatic, musical works
•Allows educational institutions to make as many copies as
needed BUT the amount is limited:
• 10% of books and published works
•10% (or 1 chapter) of electronic literary, dramatic or musical
works
Insubstantial Portions:
Educational institutions can communicate an ‘insubstantial
portion’ for free, i.e. 1%, without having to use the statutory
licenses.
Does not apply to musical or artistic works, and can’t copy
another insubstantial portion from the same work within 14
days.
Must be done within institutional premises, for educational
29. Part VA – broadcast material
•Allows educational institutions to copy audio-visual off-air broadcast material
which has been made available online by the broadcaster (eg TV programs,
podcasts).
• No limitations on amounts that can be copied
• Labelling requirements for copied items
• If communicated (eg by email), a copyright warning notice required
31. Crown copying exception - section 183
Certain Commonwealth, State and Territory
government bodies can use any copyright materials
provided the purpose is for the service of the
Commonwealth, State or Territory.
Who?
Commonwealth, state and territory departments – it does
not apply to local governments
Some government agencies and statutory bodies (may
need legal advice)
Educational purposes within educational institutions
specifically excluded.
For the services of government
32. Library/archive copying exceptions
User copying (document supply) (s49)
Inter library/archive loan (s50)
Unpublished works (s51 and 110A)
Preservation copying (s51A for works, s110B
for films, sound recordings)
‘Key cultural institutions’ and special
preservation copying exceptions – only
available to libraries with a mandate to
develop and maintain a collection (i.e. NAA,
NFSA, state libraries).
Commercial/corporate libraries?
33. Document supply and interlibrary loan
I. Libraries & archives can reproduce & communicate articles
and works to users for ‘research & study’ (s49)
II. Libraries & archives can reproduce & communicate articles
and works to another library for inclusion in their
collection; or to supply a user under s 49. (s50)
34. What is a reasonable portion?
Same as the “deemed fair” quantities under the fair dealing provision -
Hardcopy = 10% of pages or 1 chapter
Electronic = 10 % of words or 1 chapter
Periodicals = 1 article (more than 1 if it relates to the same course of
research or study
Unless the work is not available in a reasonable time and at an ordinary
commercial price
35. If work is supplied electronically, the library
must attach a copyright warning notice AND
must destroy any electronic copies made
during the process of providing the copy as
soon as practicable
36. Copying works for other libraries and archives (s50)
Libraries & archives can reproduce & communicate articles and works
to another library :
• to supply a user under s 49;
• for inclusion in the other library’s collection; or
• to assist a member of parliament.
37. Points to note
If copying to assist a parliamentarian in their duty, don’t have to worry about
reasonable portion or check if commercially available.
If supplying a document that is originally in electronic form – you must always
ask if it’s commercially available (ie there is no automatic reasonable portion)
38. Copying unpublished works
50 years after the year the creator died:
If library or archives has an unpublished literary, dramatic or
musical work, photograph or engraving, or recording or film
The library can reproduce or communicate the work to a
user for the purpose of research or study
Can be published in limited circumstances - when you don’t
know who the owner is, you must put a notice in the
Government Gazette.
(s51, s52 & s110A)
39. Preservation Copying
To preserve manuscripts or original artistic works
against loss, damage, or deterioration or to
provide a copy for research at another library or
archives*
To replace a published work that has been
damaged or deteriorated, lost or stolen*
For ‘administrative purposes’: purposes directly
related to the care or control of the collection
*Subject to the ‘commercial availability’ test
40. Preservation copying for key cultural
institutions
Allows ‘key cultural institutions’ to
make up to 3 copies from the work for
the purpose of preserving against loss
or deterioration.
41. Exceptions – Flexible Dealing (s200AB)
A. Is the use allowed under another section of the
Copyright Act? Fair dealing, library and archival
copying, statutory licence, consumer exceptions,
section 183
B. For the purposes of “maintaining or operating”
the library or archives? Or for “educational
instruction”?
C. Does the use meet the requirements of
s200AB? The use must:
• Not conflict with normal exploitation of the
work;
• Not unreasonably prejudice the copyright
holder; and
• Be a special case.
49. it’s still difficult or illegal to use most of this material without going
through cumbersome processes
Institutions are already sharing – we know the
benefits of being online
50. it’s still difficult and illegal to use most of this material without going
through cumbersome processes
open materials are materials which you can use without asking
permission – permission has already been given
Institutions are already sharing – we know the
benefits of being online
51. • open licensed
material can be
used without
worrying about
copyright laws or
exceptions – by
anyone, anywhere,
with assurance
Lock by AMagill available at http://www.flickr.com/photos/amagill/235453953/ under a Creative Commons Attribution
Licence
52.
53. • Standardisation is good –
• usability, compatibility
• Licences are good –
• international, applied
• Easy to use
• Metadata is key
why CC?
54. Licence Elements
Attribution – credit the author
Noncommercial – no commercial use
No Derivative Works – no remixing
ShareAlike – remix only if you let others
remix
61. Creative
Commons
provides
resources that
you and your
users can
legally copy,
modify and
reuse
myCCstickershavearrived!!!bylaihiuavailableat
http://www.flickr.com/photos/laihiu/290630500/
underaCreativeCommonsAttribution2.0licence
64. • More than 500 million CC
objects on the internet
• Almost 300 million
photos on Flickr alone
65. • It also provides
a tool for
managing your
own copyright
Tooled Flatty by flattop341 available at http://www.flickr.com/photos/flattop341/1085739925/
under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 licence
CRICOS No. 00213J
66. • to allow collaboration and
sharing with other
students, teachers, the
world
Girls Sharing a mp3 Player by terren in Virginia availabl
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8136496@N05/227547565
under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 licence
67. Tropenmuseum
It was an easy way to…engage new audiences…[and] spread the stories from the
collection…In the end I think more people will visit the museum and look online.
– Susanne Ton, Manager of Multimedia Production, Tropenmuseum
http://www.youtube.com/user/wikimedianl#play/all/uploads-all/0/4aPatvL5kvo
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropenmuseum
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_karbala http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ira
n_Battle_of_Karbala_19th_centur
y.jpg
museum of the tropics, Amsterdam
“crowdsourced” open access - invited public to photograph collections and
upload to Wikicommons (under CC BY-SA)
350+ photographs now on Wikicommons for use by museum and on
Wikipedia – with link back
70. (a) research or study;
(b) criticism or review;
(c) parody or satire;
(d) reporting news;
(e) professional advice;
(f) quotation;
(g) non-commercial private use;
(h) incidental or technical use;
(i) library or archive use;
(j) education; and
(k) access for people with disability.
71. (a) the purpose and character of the use;
(b) the nature of the copyright material used;
(c) in a case where part only of the copyright
material is used—the amount and substantiality of
the part used, considered in relation to the whole of
the copyright material; and
(d) the effect of the use upon the potential market
for, or value of, the copyright material.
73. • What are you doing?
• What are you using?
• How much are you using?
• What about the copyright holder?
74.
75. lost or stolen--for the purpose of replacing the work
if the officer is satisfied that a copy (not being a second-hand copy) of
another edition of the work
"photograph" includes photo-lithograph and a work produced by a
process similar to photography.
3 photographic reproductions of the work
Preservation copying
78. The Copyright Act should be amended to clarify that the statutory licences in pts
VA, VB and VII div 2 do not apply to a use of copyright material which, because of
another provision of the Act, would not infringe copyright. This means that
governments, educational institutions and institutions assisting people with
disability, will be able to rely on unremunerated exceptions, including fair use or
the new fair dealing exception, to the extent that they apply.
79.
80.
81.
82. Balfour Smith, Canuckguy, Badseed. - Original image by Balfour Smith at Duke University
http://www.publicdomainday.org/node/39 CC BY 3.0
83. Heald, Paul J How Copyright Makes Books and Music Disappear (and How Secondary Liability Rules Help Resurrect Old Songs)
LBSS14-07, Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 13-54 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=227781
86. Each Party shall endeavor to
achieve an appropriate
balance in its copyright and
related rights system, inter
alia by means of limitations or
exceptions that are consistent
with Article QQ.G.X, including
those for the digital
environment, giving due
consideration to legitimate
purposes such as, but not
limited to, criticism, comment,
news reporting, teaching,
scholarship, research [CL/MY
propose181
: ,education, ] [CL
propose: and persons with
disabilities]
[US/MY/SG/CA/PE/BN/MX/VN
propose: , as well as
facilitating access to published
works for persons who are
blind, visually impaired, or
otherwise print disabled]182 183
.
With respect to Section G, each Party
shall confine limitations or exceptions
to exclusive rights to certain special
cases that do not conflict with a
normal exploitation of the work,
performance, or phonogram, and do
not unreasonably prejudice the
legitimate interests of the right
holder.
Article QQ.G.X.1 neither reduces nor
extends the scope of applicability of
the limitations and exceptions
permitted by the TRIPS Agreement,
Berne Convention [VN propose:
Rome Convention,] the WIPO
Copyright Treaty, and the WIPO
Performances and Phonograms
Treaty. 180
Originality does not require that the idea or concept underpinning the form of expression is original or inventive, or need an assessment of the artistic merit or quality of the work. Merely that expression ‘originate’ with the author and not be derived or copied from someone else. Copyright does not protect facts!
Shopping list capable of copyright protection? Well, information (i.e. List of ingredients and quantities used in recipe) is not protected. Doesn’t need to be novel, merely skill or labour on the part of the copyright owner. Here, copyright owner would have exclusive right to photocopy, reproduce, etc the list – not copyright protection in information in the list.
Originality does not require that the idea or concept underpinning the form of expression is original or inventive, or need an assessment of the artistic merit or quality of the work. Merely that expression ‘originate’ with the author and not be derived or copied from someone else. Copyright does not protect facts!
Shopping list capable of copyright protection? Well, information (i.e. List of ingredients and quantities used in recipe) is not protected. Doesn’t need to be novel, merely skill or labour on the part of the copyright owner. Here, copyright owner would have exclusive right to photocopy, reproduce, etc the list – not copyright protection in information in the list.
In case anyone asks – definition of ‘archive’ under Copyright Act extends to “bodies, whether incorporated or unincorporated, maintaining a collection of documents or other material of historical significance or public interest for the purpose of conserving and preserving that material (and not to derive a profit)”.
In case anyone asks – definition of ‘archive’ under Copyright Act extends to “bodies, whether incorporated or unincorporated, maintaining a collection of documents or other material of historical significance or public interest for the purpose of conserving and preserving that material (and not to derive a profit)”.
Depends whether the copy has appropriated the expression of the original work – and there must be degree of similarity between the two.
Can be any part that is important, distinctive, essential.
Qualitative question
Ask – is there infringement in an article extract? Newspaper headline?
Examples of names, titles or slogans which courts have held were not protected by copyright
include:
• Exxon, a word invented as the name of a corporation;
• Opportunity Knocks, the title of a television program;
• The Man who Broke the Bank at Monte Carlo, the title of a song; and
• “The resort that offers precious little”, an advertising slogan.
In case anyone asks – definition of ‘archive’ under Copyright Act extends to “bodies, whether incorporated or unincorporated, maintaining a collection of documents or other material of historical significance or public interest for the purpose of conserving and preserving that material (and not to derive a profit)”.
In case anyone asks – definition of ‘archive’ under Copyright Act extends to “bodies, whether incorporated or unincorporated, maintaining a collection of documents or other material of historical significance or public interest for the purpose of conserving and preserving that material (and not to derive a profit)”.
REFER EVERYONE TO RMIT LIST
As a result of the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement, on 1 January 2005 the period of protection for copyright material was extended to 70 years. However, no revival of copyright that expired pre 1 January 2005 (cf. Golan in the US). Prior to AUSFTA, 50 years from end of year in which creator died. I.e. If an author died before 1956, works will be out of copyright.
Published editions – 25 years from end of year of first publication
ACC has good tables for duration of copyright – cannot show them to you though without infringing copyright.
Note – sound recordings pre 1969
Mark Twain, died in 1910, unpublished letters offered for sale on microfilm in 2001, extending copyright duration to 2048 – almost 140 years after his death!
Copyright duration in film works with script, music, etc
Unpublished works with unknown authors and ‘publication’ occurring with deposit - CAL and the State of NSW, the Full Federal Court found that artistic works were published after being deposited in the archives of the Registrar-General of Land Titles to be made available to the public.
The Court took a broad construction of what constitutes an act of publication by interpreting it to include the public being able to access the works by visiting the Registrar-General, their local council, and other methods.
In case anyone asks – definition of ‘archive’ under Copyright Act extends to “bodies, whether incorporated or unincorporated, maintaining a collection of documents or other material of historical significance or public interest for the purpose of conserving and preserving that material (and not to derive a profit)”.
In case anyone asks – definition of ‘archive’ under Copyright Act extends to “bodies, whether incorporated or unincorporated, maintaining a collection of documents or other material of historical significance or public interest for the purpose of conserving and preserving that material (and not to derive a profit)”.
In case anyone asks – definition of ‘archive’ under Copyright Act extends to “bodies, whether incorporated or unincorporated, maintaining a collection of documents or other material of historical significance or public interest for the purpose of conserving and preserving that material (and not to derive a profit)”.
Comment on The Panel– would my use of an image of the panel be an infringement of copyright – consider whether it comes within fair dealing for criticism or review – is my use a critique of the work? Or merely illustrative?
A Current Affair extract showing disguises used to protect identity of persons was not genuine criticism – poking fun cf. Days of Our Lives being a comment on loss of originality and novelty in the show. Sunday Program – drugs in sport – reporting news. Footy Show image of Russian president – for humorous purposes, not parody or satire.
Research or study – broadest of fair dealing exceptions – s40 – rigorous statutory guidelines on amounts that can be reproduced (for an approved course of study by enrolled external student of an educational institution). “reasonable portion” – work of at least 10 pages in a published edition – 10% of the number of pages in the edition; or (if divided into chapters) – a single chapter. In electronic form – 10% of the number of words or a single chapter.
Comment on The Panel– would my use of an image of the panel be an infringement of copyright – consider whether it comes within fair dealing for criticism or review – is my use a critique of the work? Or merely illustrative?
A Current Affair extract showing disguises used to protect identity of persons was not genuine criticism – poking fun cf. Days of Our Lives being a comment on loss of originality and novelty in the show. Sunday Program – drugs in sport – reporting news. Footy Show image of Russian president – for humorous purposes, not parody or satire.
Research or study – broadest of fair dealing exceptions – s40 – rigorous statutory guidelines on amounts that can be reproduced (for an approved course of study by enrolled external student of an educational institution). “reasonable portion” – work of at least 10 pages in a published edition – 10% of the number of pages in the edition; or (if divided into chapters) – a single chapter. In electronic form – 10% of the number of words or a single chapter.
Comment on The Panel– would my use of an image of the panel be an infringement of copyright – consider whether it comes within fair dealing for criticism or review – is my use a critique of the work? Or merely illustrative?
A Current Affair extract showing disguises used to protect identity of persons was not genuine criticism – poking fun cf. Days of Our Lives being a comment on loss of originality and novelty in the show. Sunday Program – drugs in sport – reporting news. Footy Show image of Russian president – for humorous purposes, not parody or satire.
Educational institutions are permitted to copy a ‘reasonable portion’ of a works and TV or radio broadcasts for educational purposes – which is typically 10%. These licences are administered by CAL and Screenrights.
Notably, uses of a reasonable portion of works for educational purposes are covered by the fair use exception in the United States and are free.
For purposes that are “governmental” in nature.
Government can authorise anyone (including non government libraries) to deal with copyright material on its behalf. Authorisation in writing, before or after material used
Can take advantage of other exceptions, and not limited to ordinary deeming provisions (10% or 1 chapter)
Traditionally activities of libraries/galleries etc not considered Governmental
Little case law: House of Lords decision in Pfizer v Ministry of Health “supply of medicine to the national health service hospitals for use in the treatment of patients is ‘for the services of the Crown’ (Re Patent law application).
Bowen CJ thought it possible this extends to services provided by the Crown or its servants to members of the public
Library and archival copying provisions only available to libraries whose collections are available to the public (inc. by interlibrary loan).
Under section 52, libraries may also publish an unpublished work where the creator simply is not known, the use will form part of a new work and meets the requirements of section 51. There is no equivalent exception for sound recordings or films. This is not an orphan works exception because it does not apply where the creator or current copyright holder is not locatable and only allows very limited uses.
Preservation copying - Under the preservation copying exceptions in sections 51A for works and 110B for other subject matter, a library may make copies for the following purposes: First, to preserve manuscripts or original artistic works against loss, damage, deterioration or to provide a copy for research at another library. Second, to replace a published work that has been damaged, deteriorated, lost or stolen. Third, for ‘administrative purposes’ directly related to the care or control of the collection. This includes educating and training staff and volunteers on the management of the collection, but does not include a reproduction to add to the collection so as to make more copies available for lending.
To make a perseveration copy, the library must not be able to obtain a copying within a reasonable time at an ordinary commercial price, or must have a good reason to make the copy. This does not include second hand copies of the work, or later editions of the work.
A museum may only make very limited uses of preservation copies – it may not make the work otherwise available to the public.
Key cultural institutions may use special preservation copying exceptions under sections 51B for works and 110BA and 112AA for other subject matter. Key cultural institutions have a legislative function of developing or maintaining a collection.
Unlike the normal preservation exception, key cultural institutions may make up to 3 pre-emptive copies of material for the purpose of preserving against loss or deterioration for manuscripts, original artistic works, published works, first or unpublished copies of sound recordings, and first or unpublished copies of films. An authorised officer must make a declaration that they are satisfied that the work is of historical or cultural significance to Australia.
Does not apply to AV material (s49) – literary, artistic, musical works which have been published
In case anyone asks – definition of ‘archive’ under Copyright Act extends to “bodies, whether incorporated or unincorporated, maintaining a collection of documents or other material of historical significance or public interest for the purpose of conserving and preserving that material (and not to derive a profit)”.
Under section 52, libraries may also publish an unpublished work where the creator simply is not known, the use will form part of a new work and meets the requirements of section 51. There is no equivalent exception for sound recordings or films. This is not an orphan works exception because it does not apply where the creator or current copyright holder is not locatable and only allows very limited uses. – 50 years after the creator’s death, archives can make copies of unpublished works, sound recordings and films for the purposes of research or study or with a view to publication.
s52 – unpublished work where the creator is not known not an orphan works exception
Preservation copying - Under the preservation copying exceptions in sections 51A for works and 110B for other subject matter, a library may make copies for the following purposes: First, to preserve manuscripts or original artistic works against loss, damage, deterioration or to provide a copy for research at another library. Second, to replace a published work that has been damaged, deteriorated, lost or stolen. Third, for ‘administrative purposes’ directly related to the care or control of the collection. This includes educating and training staff and volunteers on the management of the collection, but does not include a reproduction to add to the collection so as to make more copies available for lending.
To make a perseveration copy, the library must not be able to obtain a copying within a reasonable time at an ordinary commercial price, or must have a good reason to make the copy. This does not include second hand copies of the work, or later editions of the work.
A museum may only make very limited uses of preservation copies – it may not make the work otherwise available to the public.
Since 2006, an institution may now make a reproduction of a published work even if a later edition of the work is commercially available (new s 51A(4)) Authorised officer must make a declaration stating:
No new copy of the work can be obtained within a reasonable time at an ordinary commercial price
Providing the reason for reproduction of that particular edition
In case anyone asks – definition of ‘archive’ under Copyright Act extends to “bodies, whether incorporated or unincorporated, maintaining a collection of documents or other material of historical significance or public interest for the purpose of conserving and preserving that material (and not to derive a profit)”.
Nine metre high sculpture, French-American artist Louise Bourgeois – also at Mori Tower, Tokyo
Introduced 2006 – intended to cover uses of material that are for ‘socially useful purposes’ benefiting the broader Australian community
The open access movement is in a better place than its ever been before, as far as gaining ‘mainstream’ acceptance and being adopted by large players
There have, of late, been lots of official statements endorsing open access – from the OECD, from Venturous Australia etc
The open access movement is in a better place than its ever been before, as far as gaining ‘mainstream’ acceptance and being adopted by large players
There have, of late, been lots of official statements endorsing open access – from the OECD, from Venturous Australia etc
The open access movement is in a better place than its ever been before, as far as gaining ‘mainstream’ acceptance and being adopted by large players
There have, of late, been lots of official statements endorsing open access – from the OECD, from Venturous Australia etc
Creative Commons comes in. Hopefully you’ll remember from the last lecture I gave,
The first CC licences were released in 2002
The central to each of the CC licences are the four licence elements – Attribution, noncommercial, no derivative and sharealike
These represent restrictions that copyright owners may want to put on how people can use their material.
As you can see, each of the elements has a symbol that can be used to ‘represent’ each of these elements
this makes the licences easier understand – in theory, once a person is familiar with the CC licences, they should be able to recognise what uses are allowed simply by looking at the symbols
Users can mix and match these elements to set the conditions of use for their material
So, for example, an author may be happy to allow private uses of their work, but may want to limit how it can be used commercially.
They may also want people to remix their work, but only so long as that person attributes them and makes the new work available for others to remix
So they can choose the Attribution-noncommercial-sharealike licence
although my experience working with the literary world, I sometimes suspect they think the world is more like this; FLAT!
although my experience working with the literary world, I sometimes suspect they think the world is more like this; FLAT!
So – looking at how the CC licences are being used
According to the latest statistics from the CC website, there are currently about 140million webpages that use a CC licence
As you can see, almost all of them contain the BY element – that’s because it was made compulsory for all the licences except the public domain licences after the first year, because pretty much everybody was using it anyway
The majority also, unsurprisingly, choose the non-commercial element
Interestingly, next most popular is ShareAlike, not noderivatives – this shows that there is still a strong focus on fostering creativity among CC community, and that, rather than trying to lock their material up, people are happy for it to be remixed, as long as the new work is also sharedEven more interesting is how these statistics are changing over time
Even more interestingly – if you look at how the licences is being used over time, people are gradually moving towards more liberal licences with less restrictions on them
This movement seems to indicate that as people become more familiar with the licences, they are more comfortable allowing greater use
This is supported by anecdotal evidence from CC users who, after initially publishing their material under restrictive licences that don’t allow derivatives, often ‘re-release’ their material to allow new works
Click and flick has turned out to be highly successful, with over 9,000 photos uploaded since January
This may not seem like much on internet scale, but it’s a huge number for a library collection
It’s also significantly raised the profile of the PictureAustralia collection, with the NLA reporting much higher usage, even during traditionally slow periods
The NLA doesn’t have any statistics on how many people are using CC licences, but they say anecdotally that they think it is a large portion, or even the majority.