This webinar explains the service, covers what publishers need to participate and answers any questions you may have. This webinar was held on November 10, 2015.
3. A not-for-profit scholarly publishing membership
organization working to make content easy to
find, cite, link, and assess.
Over 5000 diverse members
All disciplines, many business models
77 million DOIs, many content types
4. Funding data at Crossref
A standard way of reporting funding
sources for published scholarly research
5.
6.
7.
8.
9. <fn fn-type="financial-disclosure">
<p>This work was supported in part by NIH
grant R01 GM094800B to G.J.J., a gift to Caltech from
the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and a stipend
from the Bayerische Forschungsstiftung to M.P. The
funders had no role in study design, data collection and
analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the
manuscript.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>
10. <body>
...
<sec>
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by the
<grant-sponsor xlink:href="http://
www.grf.org" id="GS1">Generic
Research Foundation</grant-sponsor>,
the <grant-sponsor
xlink:href="http://www.energy.gov"
id="GS2">Department of Energy</grant-
sponsor> Office of Science grant
number <grant-num rid="GS2">DE-FG02-
04ER63803</grant-num>, and the
<grant-sponsor xlink:href="http://
www.nih.gov" id="GS3">National
Institutes of Health</grant-sponsor>.
</p>
</sec>
</body>
11. National Institutes of Health
NIH
N.I.H.
National Institute of Health
National Institute for Health
Abbreviations, misspellings, translations...
13. Funding bodies cannot easily track the published
output of funding
Why does this matter?
14. Funding bodies cannot easily track the published
output of funding
Publishers cannot easily report which articles result
from research supported by specific funders or grants
Why does this matter?
15. Funding bodies cannot easily track the published
output of funding
Publishers cannot easily report which articles result
from research supported by specific funders or grants
Institutions cannot easily link funding received to
published output
Why does this matter?
16. Funding bodies cannot easily track the published
output of funding
Publishers cannot easily report which articles result
from research supported by specific funders or grants
Institutions cannot easily link funding received to
published output
Lack of standard metadata for funding sources makes
it difficult to analyse or data mine
Why does this matter?
22. Open Funder Registry
11,500 funder names and ID numbers from
curated Elsevier SciVal registry
Hosted by Crossref, available under CC0
23. Open Funder Registry
11,500 funder names and ID numbers from
curated Elsevier SciVal registry
Hosted by Crossref, available under CC0
Updated and extended regularly
24. Open Funder Registry
11,500 funder names and ID numbers from
curated Elsevier SciVal registry
Hosted by Crossref, available under CC0
Updated and extended regularly
Publishers use this list to ensure consistency
25. Open Funder Registry
11,500 funder names and ID numbers from
curated Elsevier SciVal registry
Hosted by Crossref, available under CC0
Updated and extended regularly
Publishers use this list to ensure consistency
www.crossref.org/fundref/fundref_registry.html
40. Implementation
1. Collect funding data using Funder Registry taxonomy
“The information submitted here should match the information
provided in the paper’s acknowledgement section.”
41. Implementation
1. Collect funding data from authors on submission using
Open Funder Registry taxonomy
http://www.crossref.org/fundref
44. Implementation
2. Pass funding data from submission system to production
systems
Publisher
Submission System
Grant Number
Funder
45. Implementation
2. Pass funding data from submission system to production
systems
Publisher
Submission System
Grant Number
Funder
Production
Systems
46. Implementation
3. Deposit funding data with Crossref
CrossMark participants should
deposit funding data within
CrossMark deposits
CrossMark participation
recommended for standard
display of funding information
51. Funder IDs are Critical
Deposits with no funder ID will not be visible in FundRef
Search or API
Crossref will attempt to match deposits with
funder_name only, but this is only picking up 20% of
deposits
The other 80% of funding data deposits with no IDs
remain invisible
Best practices: http://bit.ly/1Qf7R54
64. Crossref’s database is the only central source of standardised
funding acknowledgement metadata from publications
Accuracy of funding metadata is critical
An increasing number of organizations and projects rely on
this funding data to identify content and check compliance
with funder policies
Get involved and make the funding data from your
publications available, accurate and transparent
Summary
65. Publishers: deposit now!
No fees for funding data deposits
Everyone else: no action required!
No need to“join”- querying freely available