1. RESULTS
OF THE NATIONAL CONSULTATIONS ON POST-
2015 AGENDA IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC
May 6, 2013
Djunushaliev M.T.
National institute for strategic studies
of the Kyrgyz Republic

2. What are the national consultations?
Period:
• January, 2012 - April, 2013 – in Kyrgyzstan
• Up to 1 year – in the other countries
Purpose
• wide discussion on the "Development
Agenda in Kyrgyzstan after 2015"
• building a global vision of “the future
we want”
• impact on intergovernmental processes
in the development after 2015

3. 2010 -
MDG
Summit
Rio +20
UN System
Task Team
SG's High-
level Panel
of
Eminent
Persons
Working
Group on
Sustainable
Developme
nt Goals
Adoption of
the post-2015
UN
development
agenda
What are the national consultations?

4. The results of the national consultations
Report of the
National
Consultations
• April 2013
Summit of
UN
member-
states
September
2013
Intergovernmental
process and discussions
on the development
agenda post 2015
End of 2013 – 2014

5. UN System Task Team: Proposed integrated framework for realizing the “the future
we want for all" in the post-2015 UN development agenda
Human rights
Equality
Stability
Environmental
Sustainability
Peace
and security
Inclusive
social
development
Inclusive
economic
development

6. The area of the national consultations
Inclusive economic
development
Economic growth
and employment
Food security and
agriculture
Environmental
Sustainability
Energy
Water
Environmental
sustainability
Inclusive
social
development
Demographic
dynamics
Healthcare
Education
Family as an
institution
Inequality
Peace
and security
Governance
Conflicts and
instability
Values

7. Methodology of the national consultations
Government sector
Civil society
Scientific and expert community
Private sector
Average household
Migrants (internal and external)
Families of migrant workers
Small scale traders + small business +
small farmers
Women (heads of households, farms)
Ethnic minorities
Community groups
Older people
Teachers, doctors
International organizations
Youth (14-28 years)
Children (from 5 to 7 years and under 14
years)
Stateless persons
Refugees
Workers in the informal sector
People with disabilities. Families living
people with disabilities
Groups, directly or indirectly affected by
conflict and / or natural disasters + border
communities
Unemployed
Members of PLHIV community and key
populations at higher risk (IDU, SW, LGBT)

8. Base questions of the national
consultations
How do you want to see the future of Kyrgyzstan in 15 years?
Name three areas
Why do you consider these three areas important?
What do you need to do to achieve this? What's stopping you?
Who can help to achieve it?
What can you do for this?
Gathered more than 20.000 responses

9. 1. By selective interviews
2. In focus group discussions
3. Interviewing experts and
individual members of key
groups at higher risk
5. Survey via social networks
653 respondents
382 respondents took part in 27 FGDs
Interviews were included in Nation-wide
Survey, FDGs, on-line Survey
54 respondents
750 respondents, unique respondents –
596 users
4. On-line survey via emails +
web survey tools
Total participants: 1 685 respondents
National Consultation Coverage

10. FGDs Geographical coverage
PLHIV, IDUs, SC, LGBT– 16
Youth under 14 лет – 15
Ethnic groups– 15
Families of migrant workers - 12
Women as the heads of households – 14
Community groups– 17
Cross-boarder population – 13
Affected by conflict - 26
Food insecure population – 10
Children up to 5 years– 15
Small business– 14
Average households
- 20
Aged people – 16
PLHIV, IDUs, SC, LGBT – 17
Trade Unions – 18
Работодатели - 10
Unemployed – 17
refugees– 12
informal sector workers– 16
ethnic groups– 16
migrants - 14
People with disabilities +
their families - 14
Public employees - 17
Youth 12-14 years - 14
Stateless persons– 17
Farmers- 15

11. General characteristics of the respondents
Education Высшее
Более 1 высшего
образования
Среднее
специальное
Полное среднее
Неполное
среднее
Gender
Male (52%)
Female (48%)
Ethnics
Kyrgyz (55%)
Russians (20%)
Uzbeks (12%)
Others (12%)

12. Responses correlation with Areas
1
Economic growth and
employment
2
Food security and
agriculture
3 Energy
4 Water
5
Environmental
sustainability
6 Demographic dynamics
7 Healthcare
8 Education
9 Family as an institution
10 Inequality
11 Governance
12 Conflicts and instability
13 Values0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

13. Responses correlation within
Nation-wide Survey and FGDs
1
Economic growth and
employment
2
Food security and
agriculture
3 Energy
4 Water
5
Environmental
sustainability
6 Demographic dynamics
7 Healthcare
8 Education
9 Family as an institution
10 Inequality
11 Governance
12 Conflicts and instability
13 Values0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

14. Responses correlation
within on-line (e-mail)+ web survey
1
Economic growth and
employment
2
Food security and
agriculture
3 Energy
4 Water
5
Environmental
sustainability
6 Demographic dynamics
7 Healthcare
8 Education
9 Family as an institution
10 Inequality
11 Governance
12 Conflicts and instability
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

15. Responses correlation within
Social Media channels
1
Economic growth and
employment
2
Food security and
agriculture
3 Energy
4 Water
5
Environmental
sustainability
6 Demographic dynamics
7 Healthcare
8 Education
9 Family as an institution
10 Inequality
11 Governance
12 Conflicts and instability
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

16. Thank you for your attention!