SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 5
BAY STATE COLLEGE
Warner Music Royalties
Settlement
Is the company the one to blame?
Deborah Chan Studebaker
March 15, 2015
Is a royalties dispute really worth $11.5 Million?
Deborah Chan Studebaker
Law 140
Essay #3
March 15, 2015
1
Warner Music Settlement
Warner Music Group (WMG) is a business that runs many of the music industry’s well-
known record labels. Some of which include Atlantic, Fueled By Ramen, Elektra, Roadrunner,
and Warner Music. Over the years, they have grown into the third-largest recorded music
business and third-largest music publishing business worldwide (Warner Music Group, 2015). In
this case, the musical group called Sister Sledge leads WMG into a class action lawsuit over
royalties from digital music downloads that they never received.
Sister Sledge1 is a group of female singers consisting of four. They have been signed to
several labels run under WMG in the past. Sisters Debra Sledge, Joan Sledge, Kathy Sledge
Lightfoot, and Kim Sledge Allen, along with actress/songwriter Ronee Blakley, filed a lawsuit
against WMG in February of 2012. The suit was over lost revenue from digital download
royalties. WMG is alleged to have cheated the sisters out of millions of dollars in digital music
sales. Sister Sledge claims that WMG’s method of calculating digital downloads as sales instead
of licenses “cheats artists out of money due to them under recording contracts” (Belloni, 2012)
most of which were signed before digital downloading was made available. According to Sister
Sledge, the record deal they signed in the past promised them 25% of revenue from licenses and
less than 25% from sales (Belloni, 2012). This can make a big difference in the group’s total
revenue. Ronee Blakley claims that WMG promised her 50% on licenses which are greatly less
than what they are paying her based on their calculation of sales.
In response to this class action suit, WMG submitted a settlement to all artists who
claimed that they have been affected by this dispute. A decision to be made is whether the artists’
1 Sister Sledge is a group best known for their song called “We Are Family”released in 1979.
Deborah Chan Studebaker
Law 140
Essay #3
March 15, 2015
2
should be paid a royalty rate of 6% to 20% depending on each of their rates or on a licensing
basis. This means that either WMG would be split the revenues with the artist or pays the artists
50% of the company’s net revenue (Christman, 2013). The offer put on the table by WMG
consists of a pool of $11.5 million2 to be dispersed to all artists signed under a WMG label in the
U.S. before the date of January 1, 2002. WMG does not claim any wrongdoing upon making this
settlement offer. This settlement mainly allows them to “sidestep the issue of whether downloads
should be paid as a license” (Christman, 2013).
The settlement made by WMG covers the period of January 1, 2009 through December
31, 20123. Any artists who signed contracts before 2002 made approximately $381 million in
downloads and ringtone sales through the U.S. in that time period. In turn, the settlement for
each of those artists would be a pro-rated portion of that revenue (Christman, 2013). There was a
hearing regarding this dispute on January 23, 2014 to decide whether or not the settlement offer
is justifiable. Upon acceptance of this deal, it will only be a temporary fix to the long-term issue
of how to handle payouts to an artist for digital audio. (Martins, 2014)
The Federal Judge assigned to this case granted his final approval of this $11.5 million
settlement on the date of January 12, 2015. This means that Warner Music Group’s long-running
royalties dispute has finally closed and come to a conclusion. The settlement takes effect on the
date of February 25, 2015. The remaining amount of WMG’s $11.5 million settlement after
lawyer’s fees will be dispersed to 2,0524 artists who have laid claim to their rightful royalties.
The company has advertised in national media the opportunity for artists to receive their portion
2 The $11.5 million will includeWMG’s lawyer’s fees and expenses totaling$3 million.
3 This time period is based upon the statute of limitations.
4 40 artists on top of the 2,052 opted out of receivinga portion of this settlement.
Deborah Chan Studebaker
Law 140
Essay #3
March 15, 2015
3
of what is owed to them in this settlement. They have also created a website to inform any artists
who have a contract dated before 2002 that they are entitled to a portion of this settlement
(Ingham, 2015).
Upon my observations of this case, I believe that the artists are entitled to the money
claimed to be owed to them. In my opinion, their contracts should have been negotiated and
adjusted at the time digital downloading came to be. Whether or not that the company should be
at fault for not negotiating the artists’ contracts is the real question. This responsibility should
fall on both the artists as well as the company. Both parties are at fault here. The company should
have gave the artists an option during the time that digital downloads became popular. The artists
should have also been paying attention to where and how their music is being sold or distributed.
Deborah Chan Studebaker
Law 140
Essay #3
March 15, 2015
4
Works Cited
Belloni,M.(2012, February3).SisterSledge FilesClassActionAgainstWarnerMusicOverDigital
Royalties(Exclusive). TheHollywood Reporter.LosAngeles,CA,USA.RetrievedMarch17, 2015,
fromhttp://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/sister-sledge-files-class-action-286903
Christman,E.(2013, December31). WarnerMusic Group SubmitsClassAction Settlement forDigital
RoyaltiesSuit. (T.Comer,Ed.) RetrievedMarch18, 2015, fromBillboard:
http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/news/5855107/warner-music-group-submits-class-
action-settlement-for-digital-royalties
Ingham,T. (2015, February25). Warner MusicCconcludes$11.5m SettlementCase with Artists.
RetrievedMarch20, 2015, from Music BusinessWorldwide:
http://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/warner-music-to-pay-11-5m-settlement-in-artist-
royalties-dispute/
Martins,C. (2014, January 2). WarnerMusic Closeto Settling with Artists overDigital RoyaltiesDispute.
(S.Blackwell,Ed.) RetrievedMarch19, 2015, fromSpin:http://www.spin.com/articles/warner-
music-group-class-action-settlement-royalties-digital/
Warner Music Group.(2015). WarnerMusic Group Overview.RetrievedMarch16, 2015, from Warner
Music Group WMG: http://www.wmg.com

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Car Title Loans Los Angeles
Car Title Loans Los AngelesCar Title Loans Los Angeles
Car Title Loans Los AngelesTitlelo
 
2008 02 13_gm_earnings
2008 02 13_gm_earnings2008 02 13_gm_earnings
2008 02 13_gm_earningsSarah Webster
 
San Diego Citizenship Lawyer
San Diego Citizenship LawyerSan Diego Citizenship Lawyer
San Diego Citizenship LawyerJeffreyMTabor
 
Arbitration Class Action Waivers Presentation 9 13
Arbitration  Class Action Waivers Presentation 9 13Arbitration  Class Action Waivers Presentation 9 13
Arbitration Class Action Waivers Presentation 9 13Dommermuth
 
Columbia List Presentation 97 03
Columbia List Presentation 97 03Columbia List Presentation 97 03
Columbia List Presentation 97 03debraleisten
 

La actualidad más candente (10)

Car Title Loans Los Angeles
Car Title Loans Los AngelesCar Title Loans Los Angeles
Car Title Loans Los Angeles
 
13ways booklet
13ways booklet13ways booklet
13ways booklet
 
2008 02 13_gm_earnings
2008 02 13_gm_earnings2008 02 13_gm_earnings
2008 02 13_gm_earnings
 
Bad Faith Nov2013 Duty to Settle
Bad Faith Nov2013 Duty to SettleBad Faith Nov2013 Duty to Settle
Bad Faith Nov2013 Duty to Settle
 
San Diego Citizenship Lawyer
San Diego Citizenship LawyerSan Diego Citizenship Lawyer
San Diego Citizenship Lawyer
 
Boston DUI lawyer
Boston DUI lawyerBoston DUI lawyer
Boston DUI lawyer
 
Seth Bloom Legal
Seth Bloom LegalSeth Bloom Legal
Seth Bloom Legal
 
Business law part 1
Business law part 1Business law part 1
Business law part 1
 
Arbitration Class Action Waivers Presentation 9 13
Arbitration  Class Action Waivers Presentation 9 13Arbitration  Class Action Waivers Presentation 9 13
Arbitration Class Action Waivers Presentation 9 13
 
Columbia List Presentation 97 03
Columbia List Presentation 97 03Columbia List Presentation 97 03
Columbia List Presentation 97 03
 

Destacado

Record label research
Record label researchRecord label research
Record label researchLeahGibbons
 
Digital revenue streams for sound recordings
Digital revenue streams for sound recordingsDigital revenue streams for sound recordings
Digital revenue streams for sound recordingsKristin Thomson
 
Performance royalties training
Performance royalties trainingPerformance royalties training
Performance royalties trainingNan Wilson
 
How do you music?
How do you music?How do you music?
How do you music?montjoy
 
Pacific Royalties: Introduction
Pacific Royalties: IntroductionPacific Royalties: Introduction
Pacific Royalties: IntroductionMichael North
 
Universal music group
Universal music groupUniversal music group
Universal music groupguest5ed24f6
 
Universal Music Group
Universal Music GroupUniversal Music Group
Universal Music Groupshelbert96
 
Universal music presentation
Universal music presentationUniversal music presentation
Universal music presentationMichal Kitlinski
 
Denver Music Summit: musicians' revenue pies
Denver Music Summit: musicians' revenue piesDenver Music Summit: musicians' revenue pies
Denver Music Summit: musicians' revenue piesKristin Thomson
 
Royalties and tiaras
Royalties and tiarasRoyalties and tiaras
Royalties and tiarasHelga
 
The Digital Music Performance Royalty Apocalypse
The Digital Music Performance Royalty ApocalypseThe Digital Music Performance Royalty Apocalypse
The Digital Music Performance Royalty ApocalypsePaul Fakler
 
MUC109 LEC 1. Overview of the Commercial Music Industry
MUC109 LEC 1. Overview of the Commercial Music IndustryMUC109 LEC 1. Overview of the Commercial Music Industry
MUC109 LEC 1. Overview of the Commercial Music IndustryMUC109
 

Destacado (18)

Universal Music Group
Universal Music GroupUniversal Music Group
Universal Music Group
 
Record label research
Record label researchRecord label research
Record label research
 
Digital revenue streams for sound recordings
Digital revenue streams for sound recordingsDigital revenue streams for sound recordings
Digital revenue streams for sound recordings
 
Panel de fep
Panel de fepPanel de fep
Panel de fep
 
Performance royalties training
Performance royalties trainingPerformance royalties training
Performance royalties training
 
How do you music?
How do you music?How do you music?
How do you music?
 
Universal music group
Universal music groupUniversal music group
Universal music group
 
About The Gilmore’s International Keyboard Festival
About The Gilmore’s International Keyboard FestivalAbout The Gilmore’s International Keyboard Festival
About The Gilmore’s International Keyboard Festival
 
Pacific Royalties: Introduction
Pacific Royalties: IntroductionPacific Royalties: Introduction
Pacific Royalties: Introduction
 
Universal music group
Universal music groupUniversal music group
Universal music group
 
Dela presentatie SBS
Dela presentatie SBSDela presentatie SBS
Dela presentatie SBS
 
Working in the Music Business
Working in the Music BusinessWorking in the Music Business
Working in the Music Business
 
Universal Music Group
Universal Music GroupUniversal Music Group
Universal Music Group
 
Universal music presentation
Universal music presentationUniversal music presentation
Universal music presentation
 
Denver Music Summit: musicians' revenue pies
Denver Music Summit: musicians' revenue piesDenver Music Summit: musicians' revenue pies
Denver Music Summit: musicians' revenue pies
 
Royalties and tiaras
Royalties and tiarasRoyalties and tiaras
Royalties and tiaras
 
The Digital Music Performance Royalty Apocalypse
The Digital Music Performance Royalty ApocalypseThe Digital Music Performance Royalty Apocalypse
The Digital Music Performance Royalty Apocalypse
 
MUC109 LEC 1. Overview of the Commercial Music Industry
MUC109 LEC 1. Overview of the Commercial Music IndustryMUC109 LEC 1. Overview of the Commercial Music Industry
MUC109 LEC 1. Overview of the Commercial Music Industry
 

Similar a Essay #3

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Apportioning Copyright Damage...
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Apportioning Copyright Damage...Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Apportioning Copyright Damage...
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Apportioning Copyright Damage...Nevium Intellectual Property Solutions
 
Game Theory In The Music Industry
Game Theory In The Music IndustryGame Theory In The Music Industry
Game Theory In The Music IndustryBen Kilmer
 
Performance Right ? A World in Transition ABATodd
Performance Right ? A World in Transition ABAToddPerformance Right ? A World in Transition ABATodd
Performance Right ? A World in Transition ABAToddtodd brabec
 
Performance Right ? A World in Transition ABATodd
Performance Right ? A World in Transition ABAToddPerformance Right ? A World in Transition ABATodd
Performance Right ? A World in Transition ABAToddtodd brabec
 
Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 14
Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 14Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 14
Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 14Eric Griffin
 
Beastie Boys' vs. Monster Energy lawsuit
Beastie Boys' vs. Monster Energy lawsuitBeastie Boys' vs. Monster Energy lawsuit
Beastie Boys' vs. Monster Energy lawsuitJeremy Slocumb
 

Similar a Essay #3 (9)

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Apportioning Copyright Damage...
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Apportioning Copyright Damage...Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Apportioning Copyright Damage...
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Apportioning Copyright Damage...
 
Game Theory In The Music Industry
Game Theory In The Music IndustryGame Theory In The Music Industry
Game Theory In The Music Industry
 
Velvet Sky
Velvet SkyVelvet Sky
Velvet Sky
 
MEP Final.pptx
MEP Final.pptxMEP Final.pptx
MEP Final.pptx
 
Performance Right ? A World in Transition ABATodd
Performance Right ? A World in Transition ABAToddPerformance Right ? A World in Transition ABATodd
Performance Right ? A World in Transition ABATodd
 
Performance Right ? A World in Transition ABATodd
Performance Right ? A World in Transition ABAToddPerformance Right ? A World in Transition ABATodd
Performance Right ? A World in Transition ABATodd
 
Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 14
Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 14Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 14
Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 14
 
Beastie Boys' vs. Monster Energy lawsuit
Beastie Boys' vs. Monster Energy lawsuitBeastie Boys' vs. Monster Energy lawsuit
Beastie Boys' vs. Monster Energy lawsuit
 
Mic letter to potus
Mic letter to potusMic letter to potus
Mic letter to potus
 

Essay #3

  • 1. BAY STATE COLLEGE Warner Music Royalties Settlement Is the company the one to blame? Deborah Chan Studebaker March 15, 2015 Is a royalties dispute really worth $11.5 Million?
  • 2. Deborah Chan Studebaker Law 140 Essay #3 March 15, 2015 1 Warner Music Settlement Warner Music Group (WMG) is a business that runs many of the music industry’s well- known record labels. Some of which include Atlantic, Fueled By Ramen, Elektra, Roadrunner, and Warner Music. Over the years, they have grown into the third-largest recorded music business and third-largest music publishing business worldwide (Warner Music Group, 2015). In this case, the musical group called Sister Sledge leads WMG into a class action lawsuit over royalties from digital music downloads that they never received. Sister Sledge1 is a group of female singers consisting of four. They have been signed to several labels run under WMG in the past. Sisters Debra Sledge, Joan Sledge, Kathy Sledge Lightfoot, and Kim Sledge Allen, along with actress/songwriter Ronee Blakley, filed a lawsuit against WMG in February of 2012. The suit was over lost revenue from digital download royalties. WMG is alleged to have cheated the sisters out of millions of dollars in digital music sales. Sister Sledge claims that WMG’s method of calculating digital downloads as sales instead of licenses “cheats artists out of money due to them under recording contracts” (Belloni, 2012) most of which were signed before digital downloading was made available. According to Sister Sledge, the record deal they signed in the past promised them 25% of revenue from licenses and less than 25% from sales (Belloni, 2012). This can make a big difference in the group’s total revenue. Ronee Blakley claims that WMG promised her 50% on licenses which are greatly less than what they are paying her based on their calculation of sales. In response to this class action suit, WMG submitted a settlement to all artists who claimed that they have been affected by this dispute. A decision to be made is whether the artists’ 1 Sister Sledge is a group best known for their song called “We Are Family”released in 1979.
  • 3. Deborah Chan Studebaker Law 140 Essay #3 March 15, 2015 2 should be paid a royalty rate of 6% to 20% depending on each of their rates or on a licensing basis. This means that either WMG would be split the revenues with the artist or pays the artists 50% of the company’s net revenue (Christman, 2013). The offer put on the table by WMG consists of a pool of $11.5 million2 to be dispersed to all artists signed under a WMG label in the U.S. before the date of January 1, 2002. WMG does not claim any wrongdoing upon making this settlement offer. This settlement mainly allows them to “sidestep the issue of whether downloads should be paid as a license” (Christman, 2013). The settlement made by WMG covers the period of January 1, 2009 through December 31, 20123. Any artists who signed contracts before 2002 made approximately $381 million in downloads and ringtone sales through the U.S. in that time period. In turn, the settlement for each of those artists would be a pro-rated portion of that revenue (Christman, 2013). There was a hearing regarding this dispute on January 23, 2014 to decide whether or not the settlement offer is justifiable. Upon acceptance of this deal, it will only be a temporary fix to the long-term issue of how to handle payouts to an artist for digital audio. (Martins, 2014) The Federal Judge assigned to this case granted his final approval of this $11.5 million settlement on the date of January 12, 2015. This means that Warner Music Group’s long-running royalties dispute has finally closed and come to a conclusion. The settlement takes effect on the date of February 25, 2015. The remaining amount of WMG’s $11.5 million settlement after lawyer’s fees will be dispersed to 2,0524 artists who have laid claim to their rightful royalties. The company has advertised in national media the opportunity for artists to receive their portion 2 The $11.5 million will includeWMG’s lawyer’s fees and expenses totaling$3 million. 3 This time period is based upon the statute of limitations. 4 40 artists on top of the 2,052 opted out of receivinga portion of this settlement.
  • 4. Deborah Chan Studebaker Law 140 Essay #3 March 15, 2015 3 of what is owed to them in this settlement. They have also created a website to inform any artists who have a contract dated before 2002 that they are entitled to a portion of this settlement (Ingham, 2015). Upon my observations of this case, I believe that the artists are entitled to the money claimed to be owed to them. In my opinion, their contracts should have been negotiated and adjusted at the time digital downloading came to be. Whether or not that the company should be at fault for not negotiating the artists’ contracts is the real question. This responsibility should fall on both the artists as well as the company. Both parties are at fault here. The company should have gave the artists an option during the time that digital downloads became popular. The artists should have also been paying attention to where and how their music is being sold or distributed.
  • 5. Deborah Chan Studebaker Law 140 Essay #3 March 15, 2015 4 Works Cited Belloni,M.(2012, February3).SisterSledge FilesClassActionAgainstWarnerMusicOverDigital Royalties(Exclusive). TheHollywood Reporter.LosAngeles,CA,USA.RetrievedMarch17, 2015, fromhttp://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/sister-sledge-files-class-action-286903 Christman,E.(2013, December31). WarnerMusic Group SubmitsClassAction Settlement forDigital RoyaltiesSuit. (T.Comer,Ed.) RetrievedMarch18, 2015, fromBillboard: http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/news/5855107/warner-music-group-submits-class- action-settlement-for-digital-royalties Ingham,T. (2015, February25). Warner MusicCconcludes$11.5m SettlementCase with Artists. RetrievedMarch20, 2015, from Music BusinessWorldwide: http://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/warner-music-to-pay-11-5m-settlement-in-artist- royalties-dispute/ Martins,C. (2014, January 2). WarnerMusic Closeto Settling with Artists overDigital RoyaltiesDispute. (S.Blackwell,Ed.) RetrievedMarch19, 2015, fromSpin:http://www.spin.com/articles/warner- music-group-class-action-settlement-royalties-digital/ Warner Music Group.(2015). WarnerMusic Group Overview.RetrievedMarch16, 2015, from Warner Music Group WMG: http://www.wmg.com