SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 46
Radiation Pathology Of
Tissues,Tissue Radiosensitivity,
Time, Dose and Fractionation
By Dr. Deepa Gautam
1st yr Resident, Radiotherapy
2070/11/12
Radiation Pathology Of Tissues
 The response of a tissue or organ to radiation depends primarily on
three factors:
1. the inherent sensitivity of the individual cells
2. the kinetics of the population as a whole of which the cells are a part
3. the way in which cells are organized in that tissue
 These factors combine to account for the substantial variation in
response to radiation characteristic of different tissues.
Radiation Pathology Of Tissues
 the amount of radiation needed to destroy the functioning ability of a
matured differentiated cell is far greater than that of a dividing cell.
 sensitivity or resistance of a tissue or organ depends on the extent to
which the tissue involved can continue to function adequately with a
reduced number of cells.
 the time interval between the delivery of the radiation and its expression
in tissue damage is very variable for different populations.
 it is determined by the normal lifespan of the mature functional cells and
the time taken by a cell "born" in the stem cell compartment to mature to
a functional state.
Tissue Radiosentisivity
 Radiosensitivity expresses the response of the tumour to irradiation
 Bergonie andTribondeau’s Law (1906) : tissues will be more
radiosensitive if
1. their cells are undifferentiated
2. they have a greater proliferative capacity
3. they divide more rapidly.
Classification of Tissue Radiosensitivity
 Two systems are typically used to classify tissue radiosensitivity in terms
of:
1. Population kinetics: Casarett’s Classification
2. Tissue architecture: Michalowski’s Classification
Casarett’s Classification
 a classification of mammalian cell radiosensitivity based on histologic
observation of early cell death.
 divided parenchymal cells divided into four major categories
 supporting structures, such as the connective tissue and the endothelial
cells of small blood vessels regarded as intermediate in sensitivity
between groups II and III of the parenchymal cells.
Casarett’s Classification
 Group I:
◦ most sensitive
◦ Cells are rapidly dividing and undifferentiated
◦ eg stem cells, epidermis of the skin and the intestine, primitive cells of
the spermatogesis.
 Group II:
◦ Relatively sensitive
◦ cells that divide regularly but also mature and differentiate inbetween
divisions.
◦ Eg. cells of the hematopoietic series in the intermediate stages of
differentiation, more differentiated spermatogonia and spermatocytes
Casarett’s Classification
 Group III:
◦ the reverting postmitotic cells,
◦ do not undergo mitosis ordinarily but are capable of dividing with the
appropriate stimulus like damage or loss of many of their own kind
◦ relatively resistant
◦ Eg.cells of liver, pancreas, adrenal, thyroid
 Group IV:
◦ the fixed postmitotic cells
◦ most resistant to radiation
◦ Highly differentiated and appear to have lost the ability to divide.
◦ Eg. Nerve cells, muscles cells, granulocytes
Small lymphocyte , an exception
 one of the most sensitive mammalian cells
 does not usually divide
 dies of interphase (apoptotic) death
Michalowski’s Classification
 Classified tissues as
◦ Hierarchical (H) type
◦ Flexible (F)Type
H-Type
 Three distinct types of cells are identified within a tissue
1. Stems cells-capable of uncontrolled proliferation
2. Functional cells-fully differentiated, incapable of further division and
die after finite lifespan
3. Intermediate type- maturing partially differentiated cells which are still
multiplying to complete the process of differentiation
Eg, hematopoietic bone marrow, intestinal epithelium,epidermis
F-Type
 No strict hierarchy
 Tissues are composed of cells that rarely divide under normal
conditions but can be triggered to divide by damage to the tissue
 All cells including functional, enter the cell cycle after the damage
 eg liver, thyroid, dermis
Time , Dose and Fractionation
Time
 It is the overall time to deliver a prescribed dose of radiation
 Biologic effects enormously varies with time
 Longer the overall duration of treatment, greater is the dose
required to produce a particular effect
 Hence dose should always be stated in relation with time
Time
 For curative purpose the overall treatment time is about 5-6wks
 For treatment more than 6 wks , the dose has to be increased
 Short duration of treatment is used in palliative treatment eg. 30Gy/10#,
20Gy/5#
 Overall treatment time has influence on early but not late responding
tissues
Rams Story
 Experiments performed in Paris in the
1920s and 1930s.
 Rams could not be sterilized with a
single dose of x-rays without extensive
skin damage
 If the radiation were delivered in daily
fractions over a period of time,
sterilization was possible without skin
damage.
 The testes as a model of a growing
tumor and skin as dose-limiting normal
tissue.
Fractionation
 The division of total dose into number of separate fractions over a
certain period of time
 Size of each dose per # depends upon the tumour dose as well as
normal tissue tolerance
Radiobiological Rationale for Fractionation
 Repair of sublethal damage (few hrs)
 Reassortment/Redistribution of cells within cell cycle(few hrs)
 Repopulation (5-7 wks)
 Reoxygenation (hrs to few days)
Repair Of Sublethal damage
 Most important rationale for
fractionation
 Sublethal damage are repaired
in between two dose
fractions
 Initial shoulder of the curve
represents the repair of
sublethal damage
Reassortment/Redistribution
 Cells may be in different phases of cell cycle during irradiation
 A small dose of radiation given over a short period will kill a lot of
sensitive cells and less of resistant cells
 Surviving cells continue the cycle and may reach sensitive phase when
second dose of radiation is given
Repopulation
 the process of increase in cell division seen in normal and malignant
cells after irradiation
 time to onset of repopulation after irradiation and the rate at which it
proceeds vary with the tissue
 Acute-responding tissues(stem cells, progenitor cells, GI epithelium,
oropharyngeal mucosa,skin) begin repopulation early.
 Late-responding tissues(Renal tubular epithelium, oligodendrocytes,
schwann cells, endothelium, fibroblasts) begin repopulation after
completion of conventional course of radiation.
Accelerated Repopulation
 the triggering of surviving cells to divide more rapidly as a tumor
shrinks after irradiation or treatment with any cytotoxic agent
 a marked increase in their growth fraction and doubling time and
decrease in cell cycle time, at 4 - 5 wks.
 Eg. SCC of head and neck(3-4wks), cervix.
 About 0.6 Gy per day is needed to compensate for this repopulation.
 So better to delay initiation of treatment than to introduce delays
during treatment.
Reoxygenation
 the phenomenon by which hypoxic cells become oxygenated after a
dose of radiation.
 Fast component (hrs)
 seen in acute hypoxia
 reoxygenation occurs when temporarily closed vessels reopen
 Slow component(days)
 seen in chronic hypoxia
 reoxygenation occurs when the tumor shrinks in size and the surviving
cells that were previously beyond the range of oxygen diffusion, come
closer to a blood supply
Advantages of Fractionation
 Acute effects of single dose of radiation can be minimized
 Patient’s tolerance improves with fractionated radiation
 Provides time for repair of sublethal damage of normal cells
 Provides time for redistribution and sensitization of tumour cells
 Provides time for reoxygenation of tumour cells
Types of Fractionation
 Conventional Fractionation
 Altered Fractionation
◦ Hyperfractionation
◦ Accelerated fractionation
◦ Hypofractionation
Conventional Fractionation
 Evolved as conventional regimen because:
◦ Convenient( no weekend treatment)
◦ Efficient (treatment every day)
◦ Effective(high doses can be delivered without exceeding acute or
chronic normal tissue tolerance)
◦ Most tried and trusted method
 Most common conventional fractionation for curative radiotherapy is
1.8 to 2.2 Gy /# 5 days a wk for 5-8 wks
Hyperfractionation
 Keeping the same total dose as in conventional regimen in same overall
time but delivering it in twice as many #s as treatment is given twice a day
 But in practice,the total dose must be increased because the dose per
fraction is decreased with or without increase in overall time
 Aim: to decrease late effects ,achieve same or better tumour control with
same or slightly increased early effects
 shown in randomized clinical trials of head and neck cancer to improve
local tumor control and survival with no increase in acute or late effects.
Accelerated Fractionation
 In accelerated treatment, to reduce repopulation in rapidly
proliferating tumors, conventional doses and number of fractions are
used; but because two doses per day are given , the overall treatment
time is halved.
 In practice the dose must be reduced or a rest interval allowed
because acute effects become limiting.
 The time interval between multiple daily fractions should be sufficient
enough for repair of sublethal damage
 RTOG trials suggested that late effects were worse with intervals less
than 4 hrs than those more than 6hrs
 So atleast 6hrs interval is required
Hypofractionation
 the total dose of radiation is divided into large doses and treatments
are given less than once a day.
 an external-beam regimen consisting of a smaller number of larger
dose fractions, or alternatively high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy
delivered in a limited number of fractions
 Eg. ca prostate, ca cervix, palliative RT
The Strandquist Plot
 It is the relation between total
dose and overall treatment time.
 time includes the number of
fractions.
 Fig: Isoeffect curves relating the
total dose to the overall
treatment time for
◦ skin necrosis (A)
◦ cure of skin carcinoma (B)
◦ moist desquamation of skin (C)
◦ dry desquamation of skin (D)
◦ skin erythema (E).
Ellis Nominal Standard Dose System
 total dose for the tolerance of connective tissue is related to the
number of fractions (N) and the overall time (T) by the relation:
 Total dose=(NSD)T0.11 N0.34
 It enables predictions to be made of equivalent dose regimens,
provided that the range of time and number of #s are not too great
and do not exceed the range over which the data are available.
Weakness of NSD
 the system is based on skin-reaction data, it does not predict late effects
 The time correction was a power function (T0.11) that is far from
accurate.
 The extra dose required to counteract proliferation in a normal tissue
irradiated in a fractionated regimen is a sigmoidal function of time and no
extra dose is required until some weeks into a fractionated schedule.
Dose
 It is a measure of the energy absorbed per unit mass of tissue
 Unit is Gray
 1Gy=1J/kg
 It depends upon:
◦ Radiosensitivity of tumour
◦ Size of treatment volume- smaller the volume, greater dose can be
delivered without exceeding normal tissue tolerance
◦ Proximity to dose limiting structure eg. Brainstem, spinal cord, optic
nerve
Using The Linear-Quadratic
Concept To Calculate Effective Dose
 Suggested by Dr. Jack Fowler
 This model emphasizes on:
◦ The difference between early and late responding tissues
◦ The fact that it is never possible to match and differentiate two
fractionation regimens to be equivalent to both
 Linear portion of the curve(α): loge of the cells killed per Gy
 As curve bends, quadratic component of cell killing (β) is the loge of
cells killed per Gy2
 The ratio of α/β has the dimension of dose and is the dose at
which the linear and quadratic components of cell killing are equal
 For a single acute dose D, the biologic effect is given by E=αD+βD2
 For n well separated fraction of dose d, the biologic effect is given by
E=n(αd+βd2)
 May be rewritten as,
 But nd equals D(total dose),so E=α(total dose)(relative effectiveness)
 If this equation is divided by α, we have
 E/α is the biologically effective dose and is the quantity by which different
fractionation regimens are compared
The Final Equation
 Biologically effective dose=total dose X relative effectiveness
Choice of α/β:
 α/β is assumed to be 3 Gy for late-responding tissues and 10 Gy
for early-responding tissues.
 We may substitute other values that seem more appropriate.
Thank you

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

ICRU 89 summary & beyond converted
ICRU 89 summary & beyond convertedICRU 89 summary & beyond converted
ICRU 89 summary & beyond convertedDr. Abhishek Basu
 
Fractionated radiation and dose rate effect
Fractionated radiation and dose rate effectFractionated radiation and dose rate effect
Fractionated radiation and dose rate effectParag Roy
 
Robust Challenges of Bladder Protocol management ,Knowledge & Understanding
Robust Challenges of Bladder Protocol management ,Knowledge & UnderstandingRobust Challenges of Bladder Protocol management ,Knowledge & Understanding
Robust Challenges of Bladder Protocol management ,Knowledge & UnderstandingSubrata Roy
 
Beam Modification in Radiotherapy
Beam Modification in RadiotherapyBeam Modification in Radiotherapy
Beam Modification in RadiotherapySantam Chakraborty
 
Multileaf Collimator
Multileaf CollimatorMultileaf Collimator
Multileaf CollimatorVinay Desai
 
4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiologyDeepaGautam
 
Time , Dose & Fractionationrevised
Time , Dose & FractionationrevisedTime , Dose & Fractionationrevised
Time , Dose & FractionationrevisedPGIMER, AIIMS
 
Radiotherapy techniques for Breast Cancer
Radiotherapy techniques for Breast CancerRadiotherapy techniques for Breast Cancer
Radiotherapy techniques for Breast CancerAnimesh Agrawal
 
Beam Directed Radiotherapy - methods and principles
Beam Directed Radiotherapy - methods and principlesBeam Directed Radiotherapy - methods and principles
Beam Directed Radiotherapy - methods and principlesSantam Chakraborty
 
Principles of beam direction and use of simulators
Principles of beam direction and use of simulators Principles of beam direction and use of simulators
Principles of beam direction and use of simulators Anil Gupta
 
Altered fractionation schedules in radiation oncology
Altered fractionation schedules in radiation oncologyAltered fractionation schedules in radiation oncology
Altered fractionation schedules in radiation oncologyAbhishek Soni
 
LET & RBE and Radioprotectors
LET & RBE and RadioprotectorsLET & RBE and Radioprotectors
LET & RBE and RadioprotectorsDrAyush Garg
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

ICRU 89 summary & beyond converted
ICRU 89 summary & beyond convertedICRU 89 summary & beyond converted
ICRU 89 summary & beyond converted
 
5 rs radiotherapy
5 rs radiotherapy5 rs radiotherapy
5 rs radiotherapy
 
Fractionated radiation and dose rate effect
Fractionated radiation and dose rate effectFractionated radiation and dose rate effect
Fractionated radiation and dose rate effect
 
LET, RBE & OER - dr vandana
LET, RBE & OER - dr vandanaLET, RBE & OER - dr vandana
LET, RBE & OER - dr vandana
 
Cell survival curve
Cell survival curveCell survival curve
Cell survival curve
 
Robust Challenges of Bladder Protocol management ,Knowledge & Understanding
Robust Challenges of Bladder Protocol management ,Knowledge & UnderstandingRobust Challenges of Bladder Protocol management ,Knowledge & Understanding
Robust Challenges of Bladder Protocol management ,Knowledge & Understanding
 
Icru 50
Icru 50Icru 50
Icru 50
 
Beam Modification in Radiotherapy
Beam Modification in RadiotherapyBeam Modification in Radiotherapy
Beam Modification in Radiotherapy
 
ICRU CONCEPT
ICRU CONCEPTICRU CONCEPT
ICRU CONCEPT
 
craniospinal irradiation
craniospinal irradiationcraniospinal irradiation
craniospinal irradiation
 
Multileaf Collimator
Multileaf CollimatorMultileaf Collimator
Multileaf Collimator
 
4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology
 
Treatment plannings i kiran
Treatment plannings i   kiranTreatment plannings i   kiran
Treatment plannings i kiran
 
Time , Dose & Fractionationrevised
Time , Dose & FractionationrevisedTime , Dose & Fractionationrevised
Time , Dose & Fractionationrevised
 
Radiotherapy techniques for Breast Cancer
Radiotherapy techniques for Breast CancerRadiotherapy techniques for Breast Cancer
Radiotherapy techniques for Breast Cancer
 
Beam Directed Radiotherapy - methods and principles
Beam Directed Radiotherapy - methods and principlesBeam Directed Radiotherapy - methods and principles
Beam Directed Radiotherapy - methods and principles
 
EXTERNAL PHOTON BEAMS THERAPY (PART 2)
EXTERNAL PHOTON BEAMS THERAPY (PART 2)EXTERNAL PHOTON BEAMS THERAPY (PART 2)
EXTERNAL PHOTON BEAMS THERAPY (PART 2)
 
Principles of beam direction and use of simulators
Principles of beam direction and use of simulators Principles of beam direction and use of simulators
Principles of beam direction and use of simulators
 
Altered fractionation schedules in radiation oncology
Altered fractionation schedules in radiation oncologyAltered fractionation schedules in radiation oncology
Altered fractionation schedules in radiation oncology
 
LET & RBE and Radioprotectors
LET & RBE and RadioprotectorsLET & RBE and Radioprotectors
LET & RBE and Radioprotectors
 

Destacado

Photoelectric factors affecting
Photoelectric factors affectingPhotoelectric factors affecting
Photoelectric factors affectingAngela Stott
 
Radiosensitivity and cell age in the mitotic cycle
Radiosensitivity and cell age in the mitotic cycleRadiosensitivity and cell age in the mitotic cycle
Radiosensitivity and cell age in the mitotic cycleSneha George
 
Undifferentiated Arthritis - Undifferentiated connective tissue disease (a po...
Undifferentiated Arthritis - Undifferentiated connective tissue disease (a po...Undifferentiated Arthritis - Undifferentiated connective tissue disease (a po...
Undifferentiated Arthritis - Undifferentiated connective tissue disease (a po...Ahmed AL Blasi
 
Effects of Radiation
Effects of RadiationEffects of Radiation
Effects of RadiationSzeMin Chong
 
Biological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiationBiological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiationDR.URVASHI NIKTE
 
Hypoxia in clinical radiotherapy and methods to overcome it
Hypoxia in clinical radiotherapy and methods to overcome it Hypoxia in clinical radiotherapy and methods to overcome it
Hypoxia in clinical radiotherapy and methods to overcome it Pramod Tike
 
Efectul Radiatiilor Asupra Organismelor Vii
Efectul Radiatiilor Asupra Organismelor ViiEfectul Radiatiilor Asupra Organismelor Vii
Efectul Radiatiilor Asupra Organismelor Viiguest004ddb
 
Intra operative radiotherapy (iort)
Intra operative radiotherapy (iort)Intra operative radiotherapy (iort)
Intra operative radiotherapy (iort)umesh V
 
Dental extractions in irradiated patients
Dental extractions in irradiated patientsDental extractions in irradiated patients
Dental extractions in irradiated patientsUjwal Gautam
 
L03 Biological Effects
L03 Biological EffectsL03 Biological Effects
L03 Biological Effectslidgor
 
Ultrasound in diagnostics and therapy
Ultrasound in diagnostics and therapyUltrasound in diagnostics and therapy
Ultrasound in diagnostics and therapyu.surgery
 
Radiosensitivity and the Cell Cycle - Chapter 4 jtl
Radiosensitivity and the Cell Cycle - Chapter 4   jtlRadiosensitivity and the Cell Cycle - Chapter 4   jtl
Radiosensitivity and the Cell Cycle - Chapter 4 jtlJohn Lucas
 
Final presentation: Gammaknife vs. Cyberknife Surgery
Final presentation: Gammaknife vs. Cyberknife SurgeryFinal presentation: Gammaknife vs. Cyberknife Surgery
Final presentation: Gammaknife vs. Cyberknife SurgerySimren Smith
 
Factors affecting Quality and Quantity of X-ray beam
Factors affecting Quality and Quantity of X-ray beamFactors affecting Quality and Quantity of X-ray beam
Factors affecting Quality and Quantity of X-ray beamVinay Desai
 
Complications from radiation therapy to the head and neck by D. Fliss
Complications from radiation therapy to the  head and neck by D. FlissComplications from radiation therapy to the  head and neck by D. Fliss
Complications from radiation therapy to the head and neck by D. FlissEurasian Federation of Oncology
 

Destacado (20)

Gap correction
Gap correctionGap correction
Gap correction
 
Photoelectric factors affecting
Photoelectric factors affectingPhotoelectric factors affecting
Photoelectric factors affecting
 
Radiosensitivity and cell age in the mitotic cycle
Radiosensitivity and cell age in the mitotic cycleRadiosensitivity and cell age in the mitotic cycle
Radiosensitivity and cell age in the mitotic cycle
 
Undifferentiated Arthritis - Undifferentiated connective tissue disease (a po...
Undifferentiated Arthritis - Undifferentiated connective tissue disease (a po...Undifferentiated Arthritis - Undifferentiated connective tissue disease (a po...
Undifferentiated Arthritis - Undifferentiated connective tissue disease (a po...
 
Effects of Radiation
Effects of RadiationEffects of Radiation
Effects of Radiation
 
Biological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiationBiological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiation
 
Fiziologie normala-si-a-final
Fiziologie normala-si-a-finalFiziologie normala-si-a-final
Fiziologie normala-si-a-final
 
Hypoxia in clinical radiotherapy and methods to overcome it
Hypoxia in clinical radiotherapy and methods to overcome it Hypoxia in clinical radiotherapy and methods to overcome it
Hypoxia in clinical radiotherapy and methods to overcome it
 
Efectul Radiatiilor Asupra Organismelor Vii
Efectul Radiatiilor Asupra Organismelor ViiEfectul Radiatiilor Asupra Organismelor Vii
Efectul Radiatiilor Asupra Organismelor Vii
 
Intra operative radiotherapy (iort)
Intra operative radiotherapy (iort)Intra operative radiotherapy (iort)
Intra operative radiotherapy (iort)
 
Dental extractions in irradiated patients
Dental extractions in irradiated patientsDental extractions in irradiated patients
Dental extractions in irradiated patients
 
L03 Biological Effects
L03 Biological EffectsL03 Biological Effects
L03 Biological Effects
 
Ozgehan onay radiotheraphy technician estro school field shaping matching
Ozgehan onay  radiotheraphy technician estro school  field shaping matchingOzgehan onay  radiotheraphy technician estro school  field shaping matching
Ozgehan onay radiotheraphy technician estro school field shaping matching
 
Ultrasound in diagnostics and therapy
Ultrasound in diagnostics and therapyUltrasound in diagnostics and therapy
Ultrasound in diagnostics and therapy
 
X-Ray Radiation Safety
X-Ray Radiation SafetyX-Ray Radiation Safety
X-Ray Radiation Safety
 
Oral Care Of Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy
Oral Care Of Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy and RadiotherapyOral Care Of Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy
Oral Care Of Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy
 
Radiosensitivity and the Cell Cycle - Chapter 4 jtl
Radiosensitivity and the Cell Cycle - Chapter 4   jtlRadiosensitivity and the Cell Cycle - Chapter 4   jtl
Radiosensitivity and the Cell Cycle - Chapter 4 jtl
 
Final presentation: Gammaknife vs. Cyberknife Surgery
Final presentation: Gammaknife vs. Cyberknife SurgeryFinal presentation: Gammaknife vs. Cyberknife Surgery
Final presentation: Gammaknife vs. Cyberknife Surgery
 
Factors affecting Quality and Quantity of X-ray beam
Factors affecting Quality and Quantity of X-ray beamFactors affecting Quality and Quantity of X-ray beam
Factors affecting Quality and Quantity of X-ray beam
 
Complications from radiation therapy to the head and neck by D. Fliss
Complications from radiation therapy to the  head and neck by D. FlissComplications from radiation therapy to the  head and neck by D. Fliss
Complications from radiation therapy to the head and neck by D. Fliss
 

Similar a Tissue radiosensitivity

Fractionation in Radiotherapy
Fractionation in RadiotherapyFractionation in Radiotherapy
Fractionation in Radiotherapyameneh haghbin
 
clinicalresponsetonormaltissuewithradiationparag_160316113748.pdf
clinicalresponsetonormaltissuewithradiationparag_160316113748.pdfclinicalresponsetonormaltissuewithradiationparag_160316113748.pdf
clinicalresponsetonormaltissuewithradiationparag_160316113748.pdfGopireddysaisunayana
 
Fractionation and dose rate effect
Fractionation and dose rate effectFractionation and dose rate effect
Fractionation and dose rate effectVeda Varshne
 
4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects
4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects
4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effectsDr.laxman Pandey
 
Radiotherapy in gynaecology
Radiotherapy in gynaecologyRadiotherapy in gynaecology
Radiotherapy in gynaecologydrmcbansal
 
Late effects of Radiotherapy on Normal Tissues
Late effects of Radiotherapy on Normal TissuesLate effects of Radiotherapy on Normal Tissues
Late effects of Radiotherapy on Normal TissuesPGIMER
 
4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiologyDeepaGautam
 
Radiobiology of Altered Fractionation-1.pptx
Radiobiology of Altered  Fractionation-1.pptxRadiobiology of Altered  Fractionation-1.pptx
Radiobiology of Altered Fractionation-1.pptxGopireddysaisunayana
 
FOUR R’S OF RADIOBIOLOGY.ppt
FOUR R’S OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptFOUR R’S OF RADIOBIOLOGY.ppt
FOUR R’S OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptAsifaAndleeb
 
Dose response dr.rekha arya
Dose response dr.rekha aryaDose response dr.rekha arya
Dose response dr.rekha aryaDr Rekha Arya
 
4 R's of radiobiology
 4 R's of radiobiology 4 R's of radiobiology
4 R's of radiobiologySwarnita Sahu
 
Chemotherapy in gynaecological malignancies
Chemotherapy in gynaecological malignanciesChemotherapy in gynaecological malignancies
Chemotherapy in gynaecological malignanciesdrmcbansal
 
Radiation Therapy Radiobiology.pptx
Radiation Therapy Radiobiology.pptxRadiation Therapy Radiobiology.pptx
Radiation Therapy Radiobiology.pptxFrancisKazoba
 

Similar a Tissue radiosensitivity (20)

Gowtham's 3rd radiobiology
Gowtham's  3rd radiobiology Gowtham's  3rd radiobiology
Gowtham's 3rd radiobiology
 
Fractionation in Radiotherapy
Fractionation in RadiotherapyFractionation in Radiotherapy
Fractionation in Radiotherapy
 
4R of Radiobiology.pptx
4R of Radiobiology.pptx4R of Radiobiology.pptx
4R of Radiobiology.pptx
 
5 Rs OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptx
5 Rs OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptx5 Rs OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptx
5 Rs OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptx
 
4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology
 
clinicalresponsetonormaltissuewithradiationparag_160316113748.pdf
clinicalresponsetonormaltissuewithradiationparag_160316113748.pdfclinicalresponsetonormaltissuewithradiationparag_160316113748.pdf
clinicalresponsetonormaltissuewithradiationparag_160316113748.pdf
 
Fractionation and dose rate effect
Fractionation and dose rate effectFractionation and dose rate effect
Fractionation and dose rate effect
 
Altered fractionation kiran
Altered fractionation   kiranAltered fractionation   kiran
Altered fractionation kiran
 
4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects
4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects
4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects
 
Radiotherapy in gynaecology
Radiotherapy in gynaecologyRadiotherapy in gynaecology
Radiotherapy in gynaecology
 
Late effects of Radiotherapy on Normal Tissues
Late effects of Radiotherapy on Normal TissuesLate effects of Radiotherapy on Normal Tissues
Late effects of Radiotherapy on Normal Tissues
 
4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology
 
Radiobiology of Altered Fractionation-1.pptx
Radiobiology of Altered  Fractionation-1.pptxRadiobiology of Altered  Fractionation-1.pptx
Radiobiology of Altered Fractionation-1.pptx
 
FOUR R’S OF RADIOBIOLOGY.ppt
FOUR R’S OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptFOUR R’S OF RADIOBIOLOGY.ppt
FOUR R’S OF RADIOBIOLOGY.ppt
 
Dose response dr.rekha arya
Dose response dr.rekha aryaDose response dr.rekha arya
Dose response dr.rekha arya
 
Dose response
Dose responseDose response
Dose response
 
4 R's of radiobiology
 4 R's of radiobiology 4 R's of radiobiology
4 R's of radiobiology
 
Therapeutic Ratio
Therapeutic RatioTherapeutic Ratio
Therapeutic Ratio
 
Chemotherapy in gynaecological malignancies
Chemotherapy in gynaecological malignanciesChemotherapy in gynaecological malignancies
Chemotherapy in gynaecological malignancies
 
Radiation Therapy Radiobiology.pptx
Radiation Therapy Radiobiology.pptxRadiation Therapy Radiobiology.pptx
Radiation Therapy Radiobiology.pptx
 

Tissue radiosensitivity

  • 1. Radiation Pathology Of Tissues,Tissue Radiosensitivity, Time, Dose and Fractionation By Dr. Deepa Gautam 1st yr Resident, Radiotherapy 2070/11/12
  • 2. Radiation Pathology Of Tissues  The response of a tissue or organ to radiation depends primarily on three factors: 1. the inherent sensitivity of the individual cells 2. the kinetics of the population as a whole of which the cells are a part 3. the way in which cells are organized in that tissue  These factors combine to account for the substantial variation in response to radiation characteristic of different tissues.
  • 3. Radiation Pathology Of Tissues  the amount of radiation needed to destroy the functioning ability of a matured differentiated cell is far greater than that of a dividing cell.  sensitivity or resistance of a tissue or organ depends on the extent to which the tissue involved can continue to function adequately with a reduced number of cells.  the time interval between the delivery of the radiation and its expression in tissue damage is very variable for different populations.  it is determined by the normal lifespan of the mature functional cells and the time taken by a cell "born" in the stem cell compartment to mature to a functional state.
  • 4. Tissue Radiosentisivity  Radiosensitivity expresses the response of the tumour to irradiation  Bergonie andTribondeau’s Law (1906) : tissues will be more radiosensitive if 1. their cells are undifferentiated 2. they have a greater proliferative capacity 3. they divide more rapidly.
  • 5. Classification of Tissue Radiosensitivity  Two systems are typically used to classify tissue radiosensitivity in terms of: 1. Population kinetics: Casarett’s Classification 2. Tissue architecture: Michalowski’s Classification
  • 6. Casarett’s Classification  a classification of mammalian cell radiosensitivity based on histologic observation of early cell death.  divided parenchymal cells divided into four major categories  supporting structures, such as the connective tissue and the endothelial cells of small blood vessels regarded as intermediate in sensitivity between groups II and III of the parenchymal cells.
  • 7. Casarett’s Classification  Group I: ◦ most sensitive ◦ Cells are rapidly dividing and undifferentiated ◦ eg stem cells, epidermis of the skin and the intestine, primitive cells of the spermatogesis.  Group II: ◦ Relatively sensitive ◦ cells that divide regularly but also mature and differentiate inbetween divisions. ◦ Eg. cells of the hematopoietic series in the intermediate stages of differentiation, more differentiated spermatogonia and spermatocytes
  • 8. Casarett’s Classification  Group III: ◦ the reverting postmitotic cells, ◦ do not undergo mitosis ordinarily but are capable of dividing with the appropriate stimulus like damage or loss of many of their own kind ◦ relatively resistant ◦ Eg.cells of liver, pancreas, adrenal, thyroid  Group IV: ◦ the fixed postmitotic cells ◦ most resistant to radiation ◦ Highly differentiated and appear to have lost the ability to divide. ◦ Eg. Nerve cells, muscles cells, granulocytes
  • 9.
  • 10. Small lymphocyte , an exception  one of the most sensitive mammalian cells  does not usually divide  dies of interphase (apoptotic) death
  • 11. Michalowski’s Classification  Classified tissues as ◦ Hierarchical (H) type ◦ Flexible (F)Type
  • 12. H-Type  Three distinct types of cells are identified within a tissue 1. Stems cells-capable of uncontrolled proliferation 2. Functional cells-fully differentiated, incapable of further division and die after finite lifespan 3. Intermediate type- maturing partially differentiated cells which are still multiplying to complete the process of differentiation Eg, hematopoietic bone marrow, intestinal epithelium,epidermis
  • 13. F-Type  No strict hierarchy  Tissues are composed of cells that rarely divide under normal conditions but can be triggered to divide by damage to the tissue  All cells including functional, enter the cell cycle after the damage  eg liver, thyroid, dermis
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17. Time , Dose and Fractionation
  • 18. Time  It is the overall time to deliver a prescribed dose of radiation  Biologic effects enormously varies with time  Longer the overall duration of treatment, greater is the dose required to produce a particular effect  Hence dose should always be stated in relation with time
  • 19. Time  For curative purpose the overall treatment time is about 5-6wks  For treatment more than 6 wks , the dose has to be increased  Short duration of treatment is used in palliative treatment eg. 30Gy/10#, 20Gy/5#  Overall treatment time has influence on early but not late responding tissues
  • 20. Rams Story  Experiments performed in Paris in the 1920s and 1930s.  Rams could not be sterilized with a single dose of x-rays without extensive skin damage  If the radiation were delivered in daily fractions over a period of time, sterilization was possible without skin damage.  The testes as a model of a growing tumor and skin as dose-limiting normal tissue.
  • 21. Fractionation  The division of total dose into number of separate fractions over a certain period of time  Size of each dose per # depends upon the tumour dose as well as normal tissue tolerance
  • 22. Radiobiological Rationale for Fractionation  Repair of sublethal damage (few hrs)  Reassortment/Redistribution of cells within cell cycle(few hrs)  Repopulation (5-7 wks)  Reoxygenation (hrs to few days)
  • 23. Repair Of Sublethal damage  Most important rationale for fractionation  Sublethal damage are repaired in between two dose fractions  Initial shoulder of the curve represents the repair of sublethal damage
  • 24. Reassortment/Redistribution  Cells may be in different phases of cell cycle during irradiation  A small dose of radiation given over a short period will kill a lot of sensitive cells and less of resistant cells  Surviving cells continue the cycle and may reach sensitive phase when second dose of radiation is given
  • 25. Repopulation  the process of increase in cell division seen in normal and malignant cells after irradiation  time to onset of repopulation after irradiation and the rate at which it proceeds vary with the tissue  Acute-responding tissues(stem cells, progenitor cells, GI epithelium, oropharyngeal mucosa,skin) begin repopulation early.  Late-responding tissues(Renal tubular epithelium, oligodendrocytes, schwann cells, endothelium, fibroblasts) begin repopulation after completion of conventional course of radiation.
  • 26.
  • 27. Accelerated Repopulation  the triggering of surviving cells to divide more rapidly as a tumor shrinks after irradiation or treatment with any cytotoxic agent  a marked increase in their growth fraction and doubling time and decrease in cell cycle time, at 4 - 5 wks.  Eg. SCC of head and neck(3-4wks), cervix.  About 0.6 Gy per day is needed to compensate for this repopulation.  So better to delay initiation of treatment than to introduce delays during treatment.
  • 28. Reoxygenation  the phenomenon by which hypoxic cells become oxygenated after a dose of radiation.  Fast component (hrs)  seen in acute hypoxia  reoxygenation occurs when temporarily closed vessels reopen  Slow component(days)  seen in chronic hypoxia  reoxygenation occurs when the tumor shrinks in size and the surviving cells that were previously beyond the range of oxygen diffusion, come closer to a blood supply
  • 29.
  • 30. Advantages of Fractionation  Acute effects of single dose of radiation can be minimized  Patient’s tolerance improves with fractionated radiation  Provides time for repair of sublethal damage of normal cells  Provides time for redistribution and sensitization of tumour cells  Provides time for reoxygenation of tumour cells
  • 31. Types of Fractionation  Conventional Fractionation  Altered Fractionation ◦ Hyperfractionation ◦ Accelerated fractionation ◦ Hypofractionation
  • 32. Conventional Fractionation  Evolved as conventional regimen because: ◦ Convenient( no weekend treatment) ◦ Efficient (treatment every day) ◦ Effective(high doses can be delivered without exceeding acute or chronic normal tissue tolerance) ◦ Most tried and trusted method  Most common conventional fractionation for curative radiotherapy is 1.8 to 2.2 Gy /# 5 days a wk for 5-8 wks
  • 33. Hyperfractionation  Keeping the same total dose as in conventional regimen in same overall time but delivering it in twice as many #s as treatment is given twice a day  But in practice,the total dose must be increased because the dose per fraction is decreased with or without increase in overall time  Aim: to decrease late effects ,achieve same or better tumour control with same or slightly increased early effects  shown in randomized clinical trials of head and neck cancer to improve local tumor control and survival with no increase in acute or late effects.
  • 34. Accelerated Fractionation  In accelerated treatment, to reduce repopulation in rapidly proliferating tumors, conventional doses and number of fractions are used; but because two doses per day are given , the overall treatment time is halved.  In practice the dose must be reduced or a rest interval allowed because acute effects become limiting.
  • 35.  The time interval between multiple daily fractions should be sufficient enough for repair of sublethal damage  RTOG trials suggested that late effects were worse with intervals less than 4 hrs than those more than 6hrs  So atleast 6hrs interval is required
  • 36. Hypofractionation  the total dose of radiation is divided into large doses and treatments are given less than once a day.  an external-beam regimen consisting of a smaller number of larger dose fractions, or alternatively high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy delivered in a limited number of fractions  Eg. ca prostate, ca cervix, palliative RT
  • 37. The Strandquist Plot  It is the relation between total dose and overall treatment time.  time includes the number of fractions.  Fig: Isoeffect curves relating the total dose to the overall treatment time for ◦ skin necrosis (A) ◦ cure of skin carcinoma (B) ◦ moist desquamation of skin (C) ◦ dry desquamation of skin (D) ◦ skin erythema (E).
  • 38. Ellis Nominal Standard Dose System  total dose for the tolerance of connective tissue is related to the number of fractions (N) and the overall time (T) by the relation:  Total dose=(NSD)T0.11 N0.34  It enables predictions to be made of equivalent dose regimens, provided that the range of time and number of #s are not too great and do not exceed the range over which the data are available.
  • 39. Weakness of NSD  the system is based on skin-reaction data, it does not predict late effects  The time correction was a power function (T0.11) that is far from accurate.  The extra dose required to counteract proliferation in a normal tissue irradiated in a fractionated regimen is a sigmoidal function of time and no extra dose is required until some weeks into a fractionated schedule.
  • 40.
  • 41. Dose  It is a measure of the energy absorbed per unit mass of tissue  Unit is Gray  1Gy=1J/kg  It depends upon: ◦ Radiosensitivity of tumour ◦ Size of treatment volume- smaller the volume, greater dose can be delivered without exceeding normal tissue tolerance ◦ Proximity to dose limiting structure eg. Brainstem, spinal cord, optic nerve
  • 42. Using The Linear-Quadratic Concept To Calculate Effective Dose  Suggested by Dr. Jack Fowler  This model emphasizes on: ◦ The difference between early and late responding tissues ◦ The fact that it is never possible to match and differentiate two fractionation regimens to be equivalent to both
  • 43.  Linear portion of the curve(α): loge of the cells killed per Gy  As curve bends, quadratic component of cell killing (β) is the loge of cells killed per Gy2  The ratio of α/β has the dimension of dose and is the dose at which the linear and quadratic components of cell killing are equal
  • 44.  For a single acute dose D, the biologic effect is given by E=αD+βD2  For n well separated fraction of dose d, the biologic effect is given by E=n(αd+βd2)  May be rewritten as,  But nd equals D(total dose),so E=α(total dose)(relative effectiveness)  If this equation is divided by α, we have  E/α is the biologically effective dose and is the quantity by which different fractionation regimens are compared
  • 45. The Final Equation  Biologically effective dose=total dose X relative effectiveness Choice of α/β:  α/β is assumed to be 3 Gy for late-responding tissues and 10 Gy for early-responding tissues.  We may substitute other values that seem more appropriate.